Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 04 October 2023
Sec. Inflammation
This article is part of the Research Topic The Molecular Basis of Programmed Cell Death and Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases View all 10 articles

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: interplay between the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor and neuroinflammation

Fanshi Zhang&#x;Fanshi Zhang1†Mei Liu&#x;Mei Liu1†Jinmei TuoJinmei Tuo1Li ZhangLi Zhang1Jun Zhang*Jun Zhang1*Changyin Yu*Changyin Yu1*Zucai Xu,*Zucai Xu1,2*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
  • 2The Collaborative Innovation Center of Tissue Damage Repair and Regeneration Medicine of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder of middle-aged and elderly people, clinically characterized by resting tremor, myotonia, reduced movement, and impaired postural balance. Clinically, patients with PD are often administered levodopa (L-DOPA) to improve their symptoms. However, after years of L-DOPA treatment, most patients experience complications of varying severity, including the “on-off phenomenon”, decreased efficacy, and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). The development of LID can seriously affect the quality of life of patients, but its pathogenesis is unclear and effective treatments are lacking. Glutamic acid (Glu)-mediated changes in synaptic plasticity play a major role in LID. The N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR), an ionotropic glutamate receptor, is closely associated with synaptic plasticity, and neuroinflammation can modulate NMDAR activation or expression; in addition, neuroinflammation may be involved in the development of LID. However, it is not clear whether NMDA receptors are co-regulated with neuroinflammation during LID formation. Here we review how neuroinflammation mediates the development of LID through the regulation of NMDA receptors, and assess whether common anti-inflammatory drugs and NMDA receptor antagonists may be able to mitigate the development of LID through the regulation of central neuroinflammation, thereby providing a new theoretical basis for finding new therapeutic targets for LID.

1 Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that affects middle-aged and elderly populations and is characterized by an insidious onset and slow progression. Its main clinical manifestations are resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural gait disorders (1). The main pathological change underlying PD is the degenerative death of dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain substantia nigra, which results in a significant decrease in striatal dopamine and thereby causes disease (2, 3). The exact etiology of this pathological change remains unclear, but genetic factors, environmental factors, aging, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction have all been suggested to be involved in the degenerative death of dopaminergic neurons in PD (2, 4, 5). Drug therapy is the primary treatment for patients with PD, and levodopa (L-DOPA) is still the most effective drug (5), despite its side effects(6). Most patients with PD undergoing long-term dopamine drug treatment develop motor complications after an average of 6.5 years, the most common of which is L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) (7, 8, 9). LID manifests in abnormal movements such as stereotypic, choreiform, and throwing movements as well as in dystonia that mainly involves the head, face, limbs, and trunk and greatly affects the quality of life of patients with PD (9). The exploration of non-dopaminergic causative factors and the question of how L-DOPA drugs can be combined with other drugs that reduce these side effects have therefore attracted the attention of many scientists. The role of the neuroimmune inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of LID has also become the focus of research in recent years. In experimental work in animal models, we have identified that the release of neuroinflammatory factors, the activation and subtype transformation of microglia, and the activation of astrocytes all lead to the degenerative death and loss of dopaminergic neurons (1012). The loss of dopaminergic neurons causes PD, and the mechanisms by which neuroinflammation may be involved in PD and LID are unknown and may be different (13, 14). Current preclinical studies support a role for neuroinflammation in LID, and it is not possible to determine whether exacerbation of neuroinflammation may contribute to the development of LID in patients with PD (15, 16). As patients with PD are often treated with L-DOPA in the later stages of the disease, it cannot be ruled out that this treatment may be related to neuroinflammation (17, 18). The mechanism of how L-DOPA therapy may augment the neuroinflammatory response, and how this may affect LID outcomes, remains to be studied (14, 16). A link between neuroinflammation and the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) has been found (19, 20), namely the activation of glial cells and the release of inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), inducible nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and chemokines, which regulate the release of glutamic acid (Glu) from presynaptic neurons and the expression of Glu receptors in postsynaptic neurons (21, 22). NMDARs are common ionotropic Glu receptor channels, and expression and phosphorylation of their subunits GluN1 and GluN2 can contribute to the development of LID by regulating synaptic plasticity (23, 24), suggesting that the interaction between neuroinflammation and NMDARs may have an important role in the progression of LID. Synaptic plasticity refers to the regulation of the strength of synaptic connections (25, 26), by means of formation, elimination, enhancement, and weakening (25, 27). L-DOPA can lead to the development of LID through alterations in synaptic plasticity at the neurobiological level in the context of the pathologic changes underlying PD (25, 28). The corticostriatal synapses physiologically can undergo long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD) and depotentiation (“de-enhancement”) (27, 28). Normally, signals from the cortex reach the striatum, where they are filtered and integrated via LTP and LTD, and appropriate signals are exported from the basal ganglia to regulate movement and learning (27). In rodent models of PD, the cortex still sends signals to the striatum, but the striatum loses LTP and LTD, hence the ability to screen and integrate these signals and thus failing to appropriately regulate the output signals from the basal ganglia (26). In long-term L-DOPA-treated rodent models of PD, striatal synapses lose their ability to “de-enhance,” leading to uncontrolled enhancement in the pathway, which further contributes to the development of LID (26, 27). In this article, we review the possible mechanisms through which the interplay of NMDARs and neuroinflammation is involved in LID (29).

2 Overview of LID

As populations are aging, the global numbers of people with PD are increasing, placing a heavy financial and emotional burden on individuals, families, and society at large (30, 31). L-DOPA is currently recognized as a drug that offers good symptom control in patients with PD, but most patients will develop LID after long-term application, with mechanisms that are complex and not yet understood. LID is characterized by choreiform movements, dystonia, tardive dyskinesia, or simple repetitive involuntary movements, the severity of which often correlates with the degree of degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. In recent years, new research on presynaptic mechanisms, changes in postsynaptic plasticity, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic and glutamatergic neurons, and non-dopaminergic regulatory factors, as well as microvascular permeability, have provided new ideas and directions for the study of LID (32, 33). The pathogenesis of LID is complex and unclear. In this article, we mainly chose to review the effects of the interaction between neuroinflammation and NMDARs on the synaptic plasticity of neurons and to explore the mechanism and treatment of its role in LID.

3 Role of NMDARs in LID

In patients with PD, dopamine depletion and long-term treatment with L-DOPA trigger adaptive changes in glutamatergic transmission from the cortex to the striatum, leading to abnormalities in striatal NMDAR function(34). NMDARs are voltage- and ligand-gated cation channels, and their intracellular subunit composition, distribution, and phosphorylation level are related to their function. In particular, phosphorylation is an important mechanism for regulating the transport and channel properties of NMDARs(35, 36). In the brain, GluN1 and GluN2 (GluN2A, GluN2B, GluN2C, GluN2D) are the predominant NMDAR subunits (37, 38). As a calcium channel, it is mainly located in the postsynaptic membrane and recognizes the neurotransmitter Glu, the binding of which causes the excitation of postsynaptic neurons (3941). Over-stimulation of NMDARs leads to a large inflow of extracellular Ca2+, which in turn activates Ca2+-dependent enzymes involved in protein, nucleic acid, and phospholipid catabolism, and NO synthesis. This leads to cell membrane rupture and cytoskeletal changes in dopaminergic neurons in brain tissue, thereby causing dopaminergic neurons to die (42).

Abnormal NMDAR expression alters the synaptic plasticity of neurons in the striatal region and further imbalances the basal ganglia circuit, thereby inducing motor complications, most commonly LID (4345). In experimental work on animal models, NMDAR signaling via the extracellular regulatory protein kinase (ERK1/2) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways regulates neuronal development and refinement of synaptic connections to regulate the progression of LID (46, 47). Phosphorylation levels of several NMDAR subunits are involved in changes in synaptic plasticity, such as the induction of LTP, and play a role in learning and memory formation (48). LTP responds to the storage of various types of information at the synaptic level and is inextricably linked to aspects of learning and memory formation (48). LTP can also be reversed to normal levels by low-frequency stimulation, a phenomenon known as synaptic de-enhancement. This bidirectional regulation of synaptic plasticity is important in regulating motor information storage in the basal ganglia (49). The bidirectional regulation and plasticity of striatal synapses in rats with LID are more severely impaired and the loss of this de-enhancement leads to the storage of abnormal redundant motor information, which triggers the production of redundant movements, a process that is largely dependent on NMDAR-mediated over-activation of LTP (27, 50, 51). Phosphorylation levels of the GluN1 subunit and its carboxy-terminal 890, 896, and 897 serine sites were found to be elevated in the striatum of rats with LID (52). The GluN2 subunit also has an important role in LID. Individuals with PD and LID induced by long-term treatment with L-DOPA exhibit increased expression of GluN2B compared to individuals without LID (53, 54). On the other hand, since the occurrence of LID is related to GluN2A expression and the phosphorylation of ERK/MAPK, the probability of LID in PD rats was reduced by a peptide penetrating the cell membrane and cutting off nine amino acids from the C-terminus of GluN2A, thus inhibiting the expression and phosphorylation of GluN2A (55). In addition, the massive release of Glu upon activation of NMDAR increases excitatory postsynaptic calcium currents, induces LTP, exacerbates abnormal behavior, and promotes the development of LID (56, 57).

Among the NMDAR subunit types expressed by striatal projection neurons, GluN1, GluN2A, and GluN2B are most commonly regulated by phosphorylation modifications; however, GluN2C and GluN2D expression have recently been found to be associated with the development of LID as well (58). The synaptic abundance of GluN2D subunits is selectively increased in the rat striatum, allowing for a dramatic increase in the binding of the postsynaptic protein scaffold PSD-95. PSD-95 expression controls LID via dopamine D1 receptor trafficking (59, 60). Aberrant levels of NMDAR expression and phosphorylation thus play an important role in LID progression and act primarily through the induction of LTP following NMDAR activation, which alters synaptic plasticity between neurons.

4 Role of microglia in LID

Microglia are the main immune cells in brain tissue and are an important component of neuroinflammation when activated. In the resting state, microglia are characterized by small cell bodies and elongated protrusions and are important in immune surveillance (61). Microglia are particularly susceptible to activation during brain injury or in response to inflammatory stimuli, which trigger the development of a neuroinflammatory response in brain tissue. Two main types of activated microglia have been identified: M1 and M2 (62, 63, 64). In basic experiments, M1 microglia release various neurotoxic mediators, including inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS, chemokines, NO, and oxygen radicals (62). These toxic mediators activate surrounding microglia and astrocytes in an autocrine or paracrine manner, creating a positive feedback loop that promotes the development of a neuroinflammatory response. These processes damage dopaminergic neurons and accelerate the progression of LID. M2 microglia are referred to as “anti-inflammatory” cells and mainly release anti-inflammatory mediators, including IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and neuroprotective factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], nerve growth factor [NGF], epidermal growth factor [EGF], glial-cell line-derived neurotrophic factor [GDNF]), which inhibit neuroinflammatory responses in brain tissue and promote tissue repair, thereby slowing disease progression (62). These phenomena are considered evidence for the activation of microglia in response to different environmental stimuli, through a series of organismic responses(64). Figure 1 depicts the mechanism of microglia-mediated damage to dopaminergic neurons. Since microglia can switch between pro-inflammatory neurotoxic and anti-inflammatory neuroprotective phenotypes, this switch has been suggested to play a very important role in the development of LID (65, 66).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Mechanisms of damage to DA neurons by activated microglia. Microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and neuroprotective mechanisms in the pathogenesis of PD. Microglia turns into an activated M1 phenotype when exposed to stimuli such as infection, trauma, and intoxication. M1 phenotype microglia secrete pro-inflammatory factors, which further induce neuroinflammatory and neurotoxic mechanisms in the human brain through processes such as enhanced phagocytic activity and increased IL-1β, TNF-α, and ROS generation, damaging DAergic neurons. On the other hand, the presence and stimulation of anti-inflammatory factors can lead to an activated M2 phenotype. The neuroprotective mechanism of M2 microglia against PD involves the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines into the brain and the upregulation of neuroprotective trophic factors. The anti-inflammatory cytokines include IL-4, IL-10, and so on, which inhibit persistent neuroinflammation and consequently protect the DAergic neurons. Disease occurs when this balance in the organism is disrupted.

Microglia plays an important role in the regulation of synaptic plasticity. Recent and growing evidence suggests that changes in synaptic plasticity, particularly in LTP and LTD, may manifest through microglia (67). Although synaptic plasticity can manifest in many forms, the most carefully studied process with respect to learning and memory is LTP. LTP can be induced by the activation of NMDA-type Glu receptors, usually through the activity of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. Activated glial cells promote the development of LID by releasing inflammatory factors such as IL-1β as well as by upregulating NMDAR expression, which induces LTP and alters the plasticity of synapses between neurons. Current basic research has revealed that inflammatory factors released from microglia in brain tissue activate GluN2B, increase the levels of phosphorylated GluN2B subunit, and activate the downstream PKC/MEK/ERK signaling pathways, thus exacerbating the development of LID (16). The administration of continuous chronic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation to the rats with LID and analysis of the various NMDAR subtypes in their hippocampal and cortical regions revealed that chronic inflammatory stimulation further increases the release of inflammatory factors, resulting in increased expression of striatal GluN2B (16). It has therefore been speculated that the activation of microglia and astrocytes and the release of inflammatory factors in the striatum could influence the development of LID by affecting the activation or expression of this NMDAR. The release of inflammatory factors in an inflammatory rat model drove the activation of GluN2B, thereby allowing the Glu neurotransmitter to bind to GluN2B receptors, which leads to the opening of GluN2B receptor channels and the inward flow of Ca2+ ions (68, 69). These processes increase intracellular Ca2+ concentrations and subsequently trigger a series of biochemical reactions: G protein mediates the activation of phospholipase C (PLC), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol (PI) to inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacetylglycerol (DAG), which in turn activates protein kinase C (PKC) in the presence of Ca2+ (7072). PKC not only enhances Ca2+-dependent Glu release and increases the sensitivity of the postsynaptic membrane to the transmitter, but also further enhances the Ca2+ influx into the cell via voltage-dependent channels. PKC phosphorylates MEK, which in turn affects the phosphorylation of ERK (7375). In addition, there is evidence of enhanced phosphorylation of GluN1 in NMDARs in rats with inflammation, but there is a lack of definitive experimental results and literature on the specific signaling pathways involved in GluN1 phosphorylation (76). Thus, the neuroinflammatory response may have a further effect on LID by increasing the expression of subunits of striatal NMDARs (GluN1, GluN2) or by activating their function. In other words, whether neuroinflammation promotes and exacerbates LID by affecting the expression of GluN1 and GluN2 remains an open question. Only one basic experiment exploring these processes has ever been reported (6), and further studies are needed to elucidate the relationships between neuroinflammation, NMDARs, and LID and to provide a basis for finding therapeutic targets for LID.

5 Role of astrocytes in LID

Activated astrocytes are an important component of the neuroinflammatory response in brain tissue and can be classified into A1 and A2 phenotypes, similar to microglia (77, 78, 64). A1-reactive astrocytes are widely seen in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and PD and exhibit neurotoxic effects (77, 78). In contrast, the A2 phenotype has neuroprotective effects. A2-reactive astrocytes upregulate the expression of many neurotrophic factors to promote neuronal survival, growth, and differentiation (77, 79). A2-reactive astrocytes also upregulate the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), which are involved in synapse formation. However, the mechanism of conversion between the two phenotypes is currently unknown (77, 79). Activated astrocytes, the most abundant neuronal support cells in the human body, can also produce inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α, while aggravating the damage to dopaminergic neurons and promoting the progression of LID (80). In mice, microglia can also promote the activation of astrocytes. Upon activation, the astrocyte nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) signaling pathway releases large amounts of TNF-α and IL-1β, which amplify the neuroinflammatory response and exacerbate dopaminergic neuronal damage (81). At the same time, high expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and iNOS increase TNF-α and IL-1β in cellular experiments and animal models (82), which can then activate astrocytes and microglia and trigger a neuroinflammatory response (83, 84). It is evident that astrocytes and inflammatory cytokines are closely related, and inflammatory cytokines have been shown to regulate the activation of astrocytes and microglia through positive feedback in animal models and in patients (85, 86). The morphology and spatial localization of mitochondria in astrocytes are affected by neuroinflammatory stimuli, which may result in excitotoxicity by interfering with the uptake of Ca2+-coupled Glu, affecting dopaminergic neuron survival and promoting the onset of LID. Figure 2 depicts the mechanism of astrocyte damage to dopaminergic neurons.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Mechanisms of damage to DA neurons by activated astrocytes. Astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation and neuroprotective mechanisms in the pathogenesis of PD. Upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli, astrocytes become activated A1 phenotype. A1 phenotype astrocytes secrete pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and other inflammatory factors, which further induce neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity mechanisms in the human brain, damaging DAergic neurons. A1 phenotype astrocytes secrete pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and other inflammatory factors. On the other hand, the neuroprotective mechanism of activated A2 phenotype astrocytes against PD includes the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines into the brain as well as the upregulation of neuroprotective trophic factors, anti-inflammatory cytokines including TGF-β, which inhibit persistent neuroinflammation and thus protect DAergic neurons. Disease occurs when this balance in the organism is disrupted.

Astrocytes can regulate intersynaptic D-type serine content, thereby regulating NMDAR activity and neurosynaptic plasticity (87, 88). Astrocyte proliferation via NMDAR signaling in neurons may play an important role in learning memory functions, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychiatric disorders (89, 90). Basic research has shown that astrocytes can sense the synaptic activity of neurons through membrane surface receptors and respond to information from neurons by altering intracellular Ca2+ concentrations and releasing gliotransmitters, Glu, ATP, and D-type serine, which regulate adjacent neurons and synaptic plasticity (91). There is also evidence that microglia affect astrocyte activity through ATP release (67). These findings from both in vitro and in vivo models suggest that astrocytes play a proactive role in the transmission of information between neurons (91, 92). D-type serine released from astrocytes had an active effect on NMDARs in cellular and animal experiments, especially on the GluN2A and GluN2B subunits (93). D-type serine released by astrocytes functions as a co-transmitter or co-agonist of NMDARs in mice (93). In addition, changes in Ca2+ concentration in astrocytes may also play an important role in the regulation of NMDAR activity in adjacent neurons (94). Glu enhances TNF-α secretion and GFAP expression in astrocytes and promotes the expression of ionized Ca2+-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba-1) in microglia (95, 14). In experimental work on animal models, activated astrocytes release TNF-α, possibly through a self-reinforcing mechanism, which enhances the excitability and maintains astrocytes in an activated state, thus promoting LID (14, 95, 96). Therefore, astrocytes act on the development of LID through modulating NMDAR activation and expression, which in turn acts on synaptic plasticity in neurons.

6 Role of NMDARs and microglia-astrocyte interactions in LID

Neuronmicrogliaastrocyte interactions play a major role in synaptic plasticity in the neuronal response of postsynaptic neurons to L-DOPA (94, 97). Microglia and astrocytes are major players in the neuroinflammatory response, taking on a dual role between the immune and neuroinflammatory responses (98). The clinical development of LID relies on a cascade of altered pre- and postsynaptic messaging steps, leading to abnormalities in cortical neuronal messaging and abnormal changes in striatal projection neurons. In recent years, the inflammatory response induced by L-DOPA has been further explored. Both microglia and astrocytes express a variety of neurotransmitter receptors and regulate synaptic function at pre- and postsynaptic level by releasing a variety of soluble molecules. L-DOPA can over-activate glial cells, and the long-term presence of abnormally activated microglia and astrocytes leads to abnormal neuron–glia communication, which affects synaptic activity and neuroplasticity and exacerbates LID (14, 99). In response to external stimuli, such as aggregation of α-synuclein or LPS, microglia will rapidly transform into an activated state while releasing large amounts of inflammatory factors which, under inflammatory conditions at the site of injury, will further act on another type of glial cell—the astroglia (100). Stimulated astrocytes can activate and release inflammatory factors. These factors, as well as those released by microglia, act simultaneously on dopaminergic neurons and thereby lead to degeneration. Meanwhile, diseased neurons can release large amounts of toxic factors that continuously activate microglia, leaving the body in a state of marked inflammation. This positive feedback process ultimately exacerbates the development of LID both in vivo and in vitro (100, 101). In brain tissue of mouse models, it has been suggested that there are two main signals for microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: Glu and TNF-α (102). When Toll-like receptors (TLRs) stimulate microglia, they trigger pro-inflammatory programming, TNF-α production, and glutaminase expression, leading to increased Glu secretion (81, 103, 104). High levels of TNF-α and Glu can in turn induce neuronal death by stimulating NMDAR expression in neurons (105, 106). Thus, TNF-α and Glu act as two synergistic inflammatory mediators produced by microglia. TNF-α may also act on astrocytes to induce further production of TNF-α and other inflammatory molecules such as IL-6 and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) (107). In addition, TNF-α inhibits the uptake of Glu by astrocytes, while astrocytes are the main mediators of Glu clearance in steady-state conditions (108). Abnormally increased Glu in the synaptic gap exacerbates LID by promoting NMDAR overexpression and altering synaptic plasticity (109, 110). Figure 3 depicts the interaction of microglia and astrocytes and the mechanism of damage to dopaminergic neurons.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Interactions between microglia and astrocytes and mechanisms of damage to DA neurons. Both microglia and astrocytes have differentiated pro-inflammatory phenotypes that are neurotoxic and injurious to DAergic neurons, whereas the neuroprotective phenotypes are neuroprotective and protective of DAergic neurons. Under certain specific circumstances, the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory phenotypes of microglia can be switched. Pro-inflammatory microglia secrete IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, and complement component 1q (C1q), which can convert astrocytes to a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Pro-inflammatory astrocytes secrete IL-1β, TNF-α, Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and chemokine C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2), which in turn activate pro-inflammatory microglia. The phenotypic transition of astrocytes remains to be clarified. Dashed lines with question marks indicate possible relationships, but evidence of a direct association is lacking.

7 Role of NMDARs and cytokines in LID

Several studies have shown that fluctuating stimulation by L-DOPA will exacerbate inflammation in the striatum when dopamine is in a depleted state (3). The development of LID is accompanied by increased levels of IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS, chemokines, NO, COX-2, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the dorsolateral striatum (97). Notably, IL-4, IL-10, and neuroprotective factors produced by glial cells are anti-inflammatory and play a very important role in maintaining glial cell and neuronal homeostasis (111). There is evidence that IL-4 and IL-10 can downregulate TNF-α and other pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, which may reduce the occurrence of LID (14). Therefore, promoting the release of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors in vivo will be a key research direction for the treatment of LID in the future. As mentioned above, there is increasing evidence that cytokines play a key role in the pathologic process of LID (12), and inhibition of neuroinflammation can downregulate NMDAR and thereby modulate the development of LID. The development of LID is inextricably linked to the activation of glial cells in the striatum and the release of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) (112). The development of neuroinflammation and the release of cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS, chemokines, NO, COX-2, and ROS) in brain tissues accelerate the development and progression of LID by activating the Glu2/PKC/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and the NF-κB signaling pathway (16).

The accumulation of inflammatory factors in brain tissue exacerbates the activation of microglia and astrocytes, releasing more inflammatory factors and neurotransmitters, forming a vicious cycle. Microglia are essentially resident immune cells of the brain and nervous system (113). The release of Glu from microglia is a key component of neuronal damage (114, 115). Cytokines released by microglia, such as TNF-α, promote the release of Glu from astrocytes, which enhances excitotoxicity in neurons (116, 117). Once free Glu is increased in the brain, Glu receptors, such as NMDARs, are overstimulated, and large amounts of Ca2+ flow into the cells, thus leading to neuronal injury and death. The increased activity of Glu is thought to play an important role in the development of LID (118). LID may be attenuated by a decrease in glutamatergic function (118). Figure 4 shows interactions of neuroinflammation and NMDARs and the possible sequence of events leading to LID.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Correlations between neuroinflammation, NMDAR, and LID. Mutual activation of microglia and astrocytes and the release of inflammatory factors such as TNF-α and IL-1β. The release of inflammatory factors promotes the expression of the GluN1 and GluN2 subunits of the NMDAR in postsynaptic neurons, allowing the binding of excitatory neuronal Glu and NMDAR released from presynaptic neurons and the inward flow of Ga2+ to act on neuronal synaptic plasticity by regulating the LTP and MAPK/ERK phosphorylation pathways through calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). The release of inflammatory factors, on the other hand, directly promotes the development of neuroinflammation in the brain, secondary to the death of DA neurons, which leads to the development of PD and the development of LID in patients with PD after years of L-DOPA administration by exacerbating the inflammatory response in the brain tissue and thus creating a vicious circle.

8 Role of anti-inflammatory drugs and NMDAR antagonists in anti-LID

Thalidomide and 3,6’-dithiodide have anti-inflammatory effects and are thus able to reduce the neuroinflammatory response in the striatal region of the brain to a certain extent, including reducing abnormal involuntary movement (AIM) behavior in LID rats (11, 119). To date, no studies have confirmed that drugs with anti-inflammatory effects have a direct or indirect effect on NMDAR expression, and the only drug that shows a general clinical improvement in LID and is approved for clinical use is amantadine (120). Amantadine is a low-affinity, non-selective NMDAR antagonist that inhibits striatal NMDAR expression by reducing microglia proliferation, astrocyte GFAP expression, and cytokine release, thereby alleviating the onset of LID (121). Another NMDAR antagonist, ketamine, has recently been found to have a stronger binding affinity than amantadine (122, 123). Ketamine can regulate synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity by inhibiting NMDAR activity, thereby restoring synaptic function in cortical and hippocampal regions caused by chronic stress. It also exhibits a neuroprotective effect during treatment, accompanied by increased microglia phagocytosis and increased anti-inflammatory factor IL-6 in the striatum, which suggests low-dose ketamine as a potential treatment for LID (124, 125, 126, 123). In addition, the treatment of simvastatin improves cognitive function, anxiety, and depression in MPTP-treated LID mice, restores nerve growth factor IB (Nur77) downstream by reversing the increase in GluN2B expression, and reduces COX-2 and TNF-α (127, 128). A new experimental drug, agmatine, can improve the behavior and AIM scores of LID rats by inhibiting NMDAR expression in the substantia nigra, thereby suppressing the inflammatory and oxidative stress cascades, activating erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), and inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway to improve the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties of LID (129, 130).

Except for amantadine, there is no medical evidence to suggest that drugs like ketamine, simvastatin, or guanfacine can induce further improvement in neuroinflammation and LID after NMDAR antagonization. Amantadine is therefore the only drug currently used for the clinical treatment of LID. A clinical cohort might help explore the selective use of the aforementioned anti-LID drugs and provide more clinical evidence of their efficacy against LID. Further drugs that can antagonize NMDAR need to be identified, and the mechanisms underlying the relationships between NMDAR, neuroinflammation, and LID need to be examined to optimize the treatment of patients with LID. Table 1 showcases the main references and findings that demonstrate the connection between LID, NMDARs, and neuroinflammation.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Study characteristics. It showcases the main references and findings that demonstrate the connection between LID-NMDAR-neuroinflammation.

9 Summary and outlook

The regular release of dopamine in brain tissue starts fluctuating after long-term administration of L-DOPA to patients with PD. These fluctuations lead to changes in receptors on a variety of neurons in the striatum involved in intracellular information transmission, synaptic plasticity, and other processes, which further disrupt the already unbalanced basal ganglia system. This results in a progressive impairment of motor control and, ultimately, the development of LID. There is a lack of research into the mechanisms underlying LID and associated potential treatment approaches. Excessive Glu, exerting neurotoxic effects, has been found to be closely related to LID, and NMDAR plays a major role in the pathogenesis of LID due to its high Ca2+ permeability, abnormal subunit expression, and phosphorylation levels. In recent years, neuroinflammation has emerged as a hot topic in the study of the pathogenesis of LID. In response to external stimuli, glial cells can be activated into pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes, and pro-inflammatory microglia and astrocytes play an important role in neuroinflammation, which in turn increases the expression of striatal NMDAR GluN1 or GluN2 subunits and activates phosphorylation pathways, thereby exacerbating LID. Anti-inflammatory microglia and astrocytes, on the other hand, release anti-inflammatory cytokines and neuroprotective factors that slow down the progression of LID, and the conversion of the two may be a new direction of research for the treatment of LID in the future. The activation of microglia and astrocytes, the interconversion of the two, and the release of neuroinflammatory factors such as TNF-α and IL-1β can directly promote dopaminergic neuronal death as well as stimulate the release of Glu. Both microglia and astrocytes contribute to NMDAR overexpression in postsynaptic neurons and exacerbate LID by mediating LTP and the MEK/ERK/MAPK phosphorylation pathways and altering synaptic neuronal plasticity.

Currently, the most common anti-LID drug is amantadine. While ketamine, simvastatin, guanfacine, and other drugs still have a certain effect on LID, there is a lack of relevant clinical evidence. The development of new drugs and clinical translational applications targeting inflammatory factors, NMDARs, and LID will benefit patients who develop AIM after clinical treatment with L-DOPA drugs, improve their quality of life, and reduce the burden on society.

Author contributions

FZ and ML contributed to the conception and design of this study and collected and reviewed the relevant literature. FZ and ML designed the article structure. FZ wrote the first draft of this manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Ministry of Education (No: 2020-39), the Guizhou provincial “hundred” level innovative talents funds (No: GCC-2022-038-1) and the Zunyi city science and technology bureau support foundation(no: ZSKHZ-2022-267).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank ZX for his critical reading of the manuscript and all the members of our laboratory for contributing to this review. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. Jama (2020) 323:548–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cramb KML, Beccano-Kelly D, Cragg SJ, Wade-Martins R. Impaired dopamine release in Parkinson’s disease. Brain (2023) 146:3117–32. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Channer B, Matt SM, Nickoloff-Bybel EA, Pappa V, Agarwal Y, Wickman J, et al. Dopamine, immunity, and disease. Pharmacol Rev (2023) 75:62–158. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zheng Z, Lv Y, Rong S, Sun T, Chen L. Physical frailty, genetic predisposition, and incident Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol (2023) 80(5):455–61. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Reich SG, Savitt JM. Parkinson’s disease. Med Clin North Am (2019) 103:337–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.10.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Yan AJ, Song L, Zhang Y, Wang XJ, Liu ZG. Systemic inflammation increases the susceptibility to levodopa-induced dyskinesia in 6-OHDA lesioned rats by targeting the NR2B-medicated PKC/MEK/ERK pathway. Front Aging Neurosci (2021) 12. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.625166

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Roland KP, Jakobi JM, Powell C, Jones GR. Factors related to functional independence in females with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Maturitas (2011) 69:304–11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gerschlager W, Münchau A, Katzenschlager R, Brown P, Rothwell JC, Quinn N, et al. Natural history and syndromic associations of orthostatic tremor: a review of 41 patients. Mov Disord (2004) 19:788–95. doi: 10.1002/mds.20132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tran TN, Vo TNN, Frei K, Truong DD. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: clinical features, incidence, and risk factors. J Neural Transm (Vienna) (2018) 125:1109–17. doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-1900-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Bishop C. Neuroinflammation: fanning the fire of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia. Movement Disord (2019) 34:1758–60. doi: 10.1002/mds.27900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Boi L, Pisanu A, Greig NH, Scerba MT, Tweedie D, Mulas G, et al. Immunomodulatory drugs alleviate l-dopa-induced dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord (2019) 34:1818–30. doi: 10.1002/mds.27799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lanza K, Perkins AE, Deak T, Bishop C. Late aging-associated increases in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia are accompanied by heightened neuroinflammation in the hemi-parkinsonian rat. Neurobiol Aging (2019) 81:190–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.05.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Zheng CQ, Fan HX, Li XX, Li JJ, Sheng S, Zhang F. Resveratrol alleviates levodopa-induced dyskinesia in rats. Front Immunol (2021) 12:683577. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683577

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Carta AR, Mulas G, Bortolanza M, Duarte T, Pillai E, Fisone G, et al. l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and neuroinflammation: do microglia and astrocytes play a role? Eur J Neurosci (2017) 45:73–91. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ferrari DP, Bortolanza M, Del Bel EA. Interferon-γ Involvement in the neuroinflammation associated with parkinson’s disease and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Neurotox Res (2021) 39:705–19. doi: 10.1007/s12640-021-00345-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yan A, Song L, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liu Z. Systemic inflammation increases the susceptibility to levodopa-induced dyskinesia in 6-OHDA lesioned rats by targeting the NR2B-medicated PKC/MEK/ERK pathway. Front Aging Neurosci (2020) 12:625166. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.625166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lindholm D, Mäkelä J, Di Liberto V, Mudò G, Belluardo N, Eriksson O, et al. Current disease modifying approaches to treat Parkinson’s disease. Cell Mol Life Sci (2016) 73:1365–79. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2101-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Bandopadhyay R, Mishra N, Rana R, Kaur G, Ghoneim MM, Alshehri S, et al. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A perspective through preclinical and clinical evidence. Front Pharmacol (2022) 13:805388. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.805388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chen B, Qin G, Xiao J, Deng X, Lin A, Liu H. Transient neuroinflammation following surgery contributes to long-lasting cognitive decline in elderly rats via dysfunction of synaptic NMDA receptor. J Neuroinflamm (2022) 19:181. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02528-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zhang Y, Chu JM, Wong GT. Cerebral glutamate regulation and receptor changes in perioperative neuroinflammation and cognitive dysfunction. Biomolecules (2022) 12(4):597. doi: 10.3390/biom12040597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Angelopoulou E, Paudel YN, Julian T, Shaikh MF, Piperi C. Pivotal role of Fyn kinase in Parkinson’s disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia: a novel therapeutic target? Mol Neurobiol (2021) 58:1372–91. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-02201-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rahman T, Purves-Tyson T, Geddes AE, Huang XF, Newell KA, Weickert CS. N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor and inflammation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res (2022) 240:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Flores AJ, Bartlett MJ, Root BK, Parent KL, Heien ML, Porreca F, et al. The combination of the opioid glycopeptide MMP-2200 and a NMDA receptor antagonist reduced l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and MMP-2200 by itself reduced dopamine receptor 2-like agonist-induced dyskinesia. Neuropharmacology (2018) 141:260–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Dupre KB, Eskow KL, Steiniger A, Klioueva A, Negron GE, Lormand L, et al. Effects of coincident 5-HT1A receptor stimulation and NMDA receptor antagonism on L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and rotational behaviors in the hemi-parkinsonian rat. Psychopharmacol (Berl) (2008) 199:99–108. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1135-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Borgkvist A, Lieberman OJ, Sulzer D. Synaptic plasticity may underlie l-DOPA induced dyskinesia. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2018) 48:71–8. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang Q, Zhang W. Maladaptive synaptic plasticity in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Front Neural Circuits (2016) 10:105. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Picconi B, Centonze D, Håkansson K, Bernardi G, Greengard P, Fisone G, et al. Loss of bidirectional striatal synaptic plasticity in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Nat Neurosci (2003) 6:501–6. doi: 10.1038/nn1040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Prescott IA, Dostrovsky JO, Moro E, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Hutchison WD. Levodopa enhances synaptic plasticity in the substantia nigra pars reticulata of Parkinson’s disease patients. Brain (2009) 132:309–18. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Varley JA, Webb AJS, Balint B, Fung VSC, Sethi KD, Tijssen MAJ, et al. The Movement disorder associated with NMDAR antibody-encephalitis is complex and characteristic: an expert video-rating study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2019) 90:724–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Culberson JW, Kopel J, Sehar U, Reddy PH. Urgent needs of caregiving in ageing populations with Alzheimer’s disease and other chronic conditions: Support our loved ones. Ageing Res Rev (2023) 90:102001. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Leal TP, Rao SC, French-Kwawu JN, Gouveia MH, Borda V, Bandres-Ciga S, et al. X-chromosome association study in latin american cohorts identifies new loci in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord (2023) 38(9):1625–35. doi: 10.1002/mds.29508

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chung SJ, Yoo HS, Shin NY, Park YW, Lee HS, Hong JM, et al. Perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia and long-term motor prognosis in newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology (2021) 96:e2121–31. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011797

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Scarduzio M, Hess EJ, Standaert DG, Eskow Jaunarajs KL. Striatal synaptic dysfunction in dystonia and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Neurobiol Dis (2022) 166:105650. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Calon F, Rajput AH, Hornykiewicz O, Bédard PJ, Di Paolo T. Levodopa-induced motor complications are associated with alterations of glutamate receptors in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis (2003) 14:404–16. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Perszyk RE, Zheng ZS, Banke TG, Zhang J, Xie LL, Mcdaniel MJ, et al. The negative allosteric modulator EU1794-4 reduces single-channel conductance and Ca2+ Permeability of GluN1/GluN2A N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Mol Pharmacol (2021) 99:399–411. doi: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Pokkula S, Thakur SR. Icariin ameliorates partial sciatic nerve ligation induced neuropathic pain in rats: an evidence of in silico and in vivo studies. J Pharm Pharmacol (2021) 73:874–80. doi: 10.1093/jpp/rgab021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Loureiro CM, Shuhama R, Fachim HA, Menezes PR, Del-Ben CM, Louzada P. Low plasma concentrations of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits as a possible biomarker for psychosis. Schizophr Res (2018) 202:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Lee J, Kim C, Yeom HD, Nguyen KVA, Eom S, Lee S, et al. Subunit-specific effects of poricoic acid A on NMDA receptors. Pharmacol Rep (2020) 72:472–80. doi: 10.1007/s43440-019-00036-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Xiong L, Sun CF, Zhang J, Gao YB, Wang LF, Zuo HY, et al. Microwave exposure impairs synaptic plasticity in the rat hippocampus and PC12 cells through over-activation of the NMDA receptor signaling pathway. Biomed Environ Sci (2015) 28:13–24. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fouad IA, Sharaf NM, Abdelghany RM, El Sayed NSE. Neuromodulatory effect of thymoquinone in attenuating glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity targeting the amyloidogenic and apoptotic pathway. Front Neurol (2018) 9. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Swaminathan M, Hill-Yardin EL, Bornstein JC, Foong JPP. Endogenous glutamate excites myenteric calbindin neurons by activating group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in the mouse colon. Front Neurosci (2019) 13. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Verma M, Lizama BN, Chu CT. Excitotoxicity, calcium and mitochondria: a triad in synaptic neurodegeneration. Transl Neurodegener (2022) 11:3. doi: 10.1186/s40035-021-00278-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bagetta V, Ghiglieri V, Sgobio C, Calabresi P, Picconi B. Synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Biochem Soc Trans (2010) 38:493–7. doi: 10.1042/BST0380493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Finlay C, Duty S. Therapeutic potential of targeting glutamate receptors in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) (2014) 121:861–80. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1176-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Morin N, Di Paolo T. Pharmacological treatments inhibiting levodopa-induced dyskinesias in MPTP-lesioned monkeys: brain glutamate biochemical correlates. Front Neurol (2014) 5:144. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Manasian Y, Ivanov A, Tyzio R, Pellegrino C, et al. The NMDA receptor is coupled to the ERK pathway by a direct interaction between NR2B and RasGRF1. Neuron (2003) 40:775–84. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00645-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Morin N, Morissette M, Grégoire L, Di Paolo T. mGlu5, dopamine D2 and adenosine A2A receptors in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias. Curr Neuropharmacol (2016) 14:481–93. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666151201185652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lee H-K, Barbarosie M, Kameyama K, Bear MF, Huganir RL. Regulation of distinct AMPA receptor phosphorylation sites during bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Nature (2000) 405:955–9. doi: 10.1038/35016089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Calabrese V, Di Maio A, Marino G, Cardinale A, Natale G, De Rosa A, et al. Rapamycin, by inhibiting mTORC1 signaling, prevents the loss of striatal bidirectional synaptic plasticity in a rat model of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Front Aging Neurosci (2020) 12. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Thiele SL, Chen B, Lo C, Gertler TS, Warre R, Surmeier JD, et al. Selective loss of bi-directional synaptic plasticity in the direct and indirect striatal output pathways accompanies generation of parkinsonism and l-DOPA induced dyskinesia in mouse models. Neurobiol Dis (2014) 71:334–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Cerovic M, Bagetta V, Pendolino V, Ghiglieri V, Fasano S, Morella I, et al. Derangement of Ras-guanine nucleotide-releasing factor 1 (Ras-GRF1) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) dependent striatal plasticity in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Biol Psychiatry (2015) 77:106–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ba M, Kong M, Yang H, Ma G, Lu G, Chen S, et al. Changes in subcellular distribution and phosphorylation of GluR1 in lesioned striatum of 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned and l-dopa-treated rats. Neurochem Res (2006) 31:1337–47. doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9177-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Quintana A, Melon C, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Salin P, Savasta M, Sgambato-Faure V. Forelimb dyskinesia mediated by high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is linked to rapid activation of the NR2B subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Eur J Neurosci (2010) 32:423–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07290.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Quintana A, Sgambato-Faure V, Savasta M. Effects of L-DOPA and STN-HFS dyskinesiogenic treatments on NR2B regulation in basal ganglia in the rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis (2012) 48:379–90. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Jindal A, Rajagopal S, Winter L, Miller JW, Jacobsen DW, Brigman J, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia leads to exacerbation of ischemic brain damage: Role of GluN2A NMDA receptors. Neurobiol Dis (2019) 127:287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Shen W, Plotkin JL, Francardo V, Ko WK, Xie Z, Li Q, et al. M4 muscarinic receptor signaling ameliorates striatal plasticity deficits in models of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Neuron (2015) 88:762–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Shen W, Plotkin JL, Francardo V, Ko WK, Xie Z, Li Q, et al. M4 muscarinic receptor signaling ameliorates striatal plasticity deficits in models of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Neuron (2016) 90:1139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Mellone M, Zianni E, Stanic J, Campanelli F, Marino G, Ghiglieri V, et al. NMDA receptor GluN2D subunit participates to levodopa-induced dyskinesia pathophysiology. Neurobiol Dis (2019) 121:338–49. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.09.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Amani M, Zolghadrnasab M, Salari AA. NMDA receptor in the hippocampus alters neurobehavioral phenotypes through inflammatory cytokines in rats with sporadic Alzheimer-like disease. Physiol Behav (2019) 202:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Porras G, Berthet A, Dehay B, Li Q, Ladepeche L, Normand E, et al. PSD-95 expression controls L-DOPA dyskinesia through dopamine D1 receptor trafficking. J Clin Invest (2012) 122:3977–89. doi: 10.1172/JCI59426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Schramm E, Waisman A. Microglia as central protagonists in the chronic stress response. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2022) 9(6):e200023. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Paolicelli RC, Sierra A, Stevens B, Tremblay ME, Aguzzi A, Ajami B, et al. Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron (2022) 110:3458–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Caffarel MM, Braza MS. Microglia and metastases to the central nervous system: victim, ravager, or something else? J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2022) 41:327. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02535-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Xu J, Farsad HL, Hou Y, Barclay K, Lopez BA, Yamada S, et al. Human striatal glia differentially contribute to AD- and PD-specific neurodegeneration. Nat Aging (2023) 3:346–65. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00363-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Nascimento GC, Santos BM, Pedrazzi JF, Silva-Amaral D, Bortolanza M, Harris GT, et al. Effects of hydrogen gas inhalation on L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Brain Behav Immun Health (2023) 30:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2023.100623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Lecours C, St-Pierre MK, Picard K, Bordeleau M, Bourque M, Awogbindin IO, et al. Levodopa partially rescues microglial numerical, morphological, and phagolysosomal alterations in a monkey model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav Immun (2020) 90:81–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Innes S, Pariante CM, Borsini A. Microglial-driven changes in synaptic plasticity: A possible role in major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2019) 102:236–47. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Vikman KS, Rycroft BK, Christie MJ. Switch to Ca2+-permeable AMPA and reduced NR2B NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission at dorsal horn nociceptive synapses during inflammatory pain in the rat. J Physiol (2008) 586:515–27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145581

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Dedek A, Xu J, Kandegedara CM, Lorenzo L, Godin AG, De Koninck Y, et al. Loss of STEP61 couples disinhibition to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor potentiation in rodent and human spinal pain processing. Brain (2019) 142:1535–46. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Guo W, Wei F, Zou S, Robbins MT, Sugiyo S, Ikeda T, et al. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor NMDA receptor coupling and signaling cascade mediate spinal dorsal horn NMDA receptor 2B tyrosine phosphorylation associated with inflammatory hyperalgesia. J Neurosci (2004) 24:9161–73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3422-04.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Bu F, Tian H, Gong S, Zhu Q, Xu GY, Tao J, et al. Phosphorylation of NR2B NMDA subunits by protein kinase C in arcuate nucleus contributes to inflammatory pain in rats. Sci Rep (2015) 5:15945. doi: 10.1038/srep15945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Litosch I. Regulating G protein activity by lipase-independent functions of phospholipase C. Life Sci (2015) 137:116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Park ES, Kim SY, Youn DH. NMDA receptor, PKC and ERK prevent fos expression induced by the activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in the spinal trigeminal subnucleus oralis. Mol Cells (2010) 30:461–6. doi: 10.1007/s10059-010-0140-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Liu Y, Zhao N, Li C, Chang Q, Liu X, Liao Y, et al. Longistyline C acts antidepressant in vivo and neuroprotection in vitro against glutamate-induced cytotoxicity by regulating NMDAR/NR2B-ERK pathway in PC12 cells. PloS One (2017) 12:e0183702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Jiang S, Li X, Jin W, Duan X, Bo L, Wu J, et al. Ketamine-induced neurotoxicity blocked by N-Methyl-d-aspartate is mediated through activation of PKC/ERK pathway in developing hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett (2018) 673:122–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Peng JM, Xu LS, Zhu Q, Gong S, Yu XM, Guo SY, et al. Enhanced NMDA receptor NR1 phosphorylation and neuronal activity in the arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus following peripheral inflammation. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2011) 32:160–6. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Kwon HS, Koh SH. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener (2020) 9:42. doi: 10.1186/s40035-020-00221-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Qiu YM, Zhang CL, Chen AQ, Wang HL, Zhou YF, Li YN, et al. Immune cells in the BBB disruption after acute ischemic stroke: targets for immune therapy? Front Immunol (2021) 12:678744. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678744

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Li T, Chen X, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Yao W. An update on reactive astrocytes in chronic pain. J Neuroinflamm (2019) 16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1524-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Fonteles AA, Neves JCS, Menezes APF, Pereira JF, Silva ATA, Cunha RA, et al. ATP signaling controlling dyskinesia through P2X7 receptors. Front Mol Neurosci (2020) 13:111. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Wang Y, Li L, Wu Y, Zhang S, Ju Q, Yang Y, et al. CD44 deficiency represses neuroinflammation and rescues dopaminergic neurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacol Res (2022) 177:106133. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Pereira MD, Abreu GHD, Rocca J, Hamadat S, Raisman-Vozari R, Michel PP, et al. Contributive role of TNF-alpha to L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion model of Parkinson’s disease. Front Pharmacol (2021) 11. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.617085

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Russ K, Teku G, Bousset L, Redeker V, Piel S, Savchenko E, et al. TNF-α and α-synuclein fibrils differently regulate human astrocyte immune reactivity and impair mitochondrial respiration. Cell Rep (2021) 34:108895. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Liu Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Li W, Wang M, Song N, et al. Impeding the combination of astrocytic ASCT2 and NLRP3 by talniflumate alleviates neuroinflammation in experimental models of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Pharm Sin B (2023) 13(2):662–77. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Lee Y, Lee S, Chang SC, Lee J. Significant roles of neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: therapeutic targets for PD prevention. Arch Pharm Res (2019) 42:416–25. doi: 10.1007/s12272-019-01133-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Zhang W, Xiao D, Mao Q, Xia H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2023) 8:267. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01486-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Trudler D, Sanz-Blasco S, Eisele YS, Ghatak S, Bodhinathan K, Akhtar MW, et al. α-synuclein oligomers induce glutamate release from astrocytes and excessive extrasynaptic NMDAR activity in neurons, thus contributing to synapse loss. J Neurosci (2021) 41:2264–73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1871-20.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Baier MP, Nagaraja RY, Yarbrough HP, Owen DB, Masingale AM, Ranjit R, et al. Selective ablation of Sod2 in astrocytes induces sex-specific effects on cognitive function, d-serine availability, and astrogliosis. J Neurosci (2022) 42:5992–6006. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2543-21.2022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Lavaur J, Le Nogue D, Lemaire M, Pype J, Farjot G, Hirsch EC, et al. The noble gas xenon provides protection and trophic stimulation to midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurochem (2017) 142:14–28. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zhou J, Geng Y, Su T, Wang Q, Ren Y, Zhao J, et al. NMDA receptor-dependent prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 induction in neurons promotes glial proliferation during brain development and injury. Cell Rep (2022) 38:110557. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Koh W, Park M, Chun YE, Lee J, Shim HS, Park MG, et al. Astrocytes render memory flexible by releasing D-serine and regulating NMDA receptor tone in the hippocampus. Biol Psychiatry (2022) 91:740–52. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Park A, Croset V, Otto N, Agarwal D, Treiber CD, Meschi E, et al. Gliotransmission of D-serine promotes thirst-directed behaviors in Drosophila. Curr Biol (2022) 32:3952–3970.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Bodner O, Radzishevsky I, Foltyn VN, Touitou A, Valenta AC, Rangel IF, et al. D-serine signaling and NMDAR-mediated synaptic plasticity are regulated by system A-type of glutamine/D-serine dual transporters. J Neurosci (2020) 40:6489–502. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0801-20.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Lalo U, Bogdanov A, Pankratov Y. Diversity of astroglial effects on aging- and experience-related cortical metaplasticity. Front Mol Neurosci (2018) 11:239. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Bortolanza M, Cavalcanti-Kiwiatkoski R, Padovan-Neto FE, Da-Silva CA, Mitkovski M, Raisman-Vozari R, et al. Glial activation is associated with l-DOPA induced dyskinesia and blocked by a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis (2015) 73:377–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Ohlin KE, Francardo V, Lindgren HS, Sillivan SE, O’sullivan SS, Luksik AS, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is upregulated by L-dopa in the parkinsonian brain: implications for the development of dyskinesia. Brain (2011) 134:2339–57. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Hanslik KL, Marino KM, Ulland TK. Modulation of glial function in health, aging, and neurodegenerative disease. Front Cell Neurosci (2021) 15:718324. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.718324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Stevenson R, Samokhina E, Rossetti I, Morley JW, Buskila Y. Neuromodulation of glial function during neurodegeneration. Front Cell Neurosci (2020) 14:278. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Yuan Y, Zhang X, Wu Y, Lian P, Cao X, Xu Y. ONO-2506 can delay levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the early stage. Neuroscience (2023) 523:61–79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Saijo K, Winner B, Carson CT, Collier JG, Boyer L, Rosenfeld MG, et al. A Nurr1/CoREST pathway in microglia and astrocytes protects dopaminergic neurons from inflammation-induced death. Cell (2009) 137:47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Absinta M, Maric D, Gharagozloo M, Garton T, Smith MD, Jin J, et al. A lymphocyte-microglia-astrocyte axis in chronic active multiple sclerosis. Nature (2021) 597:709–14. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03892-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Keaney J, Gasser J, Gillet G, Scholz D, Kadiu I. Inhibition of bruton’s tyrosine kinase modulates microglial phagocytosis: therapeutic implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2019) 14:448–61. doi: 10.1007/s11481-019-09839-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Takeuchi H, Mizuno T, Zhang G, Wang J, Kawanokuchi J, Kuno R, et al. Neuritic beading induced by activated microglia is an early feature of neuronal dysfunction toward neuronal death by inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and axonal transport. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:10444–54. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413863200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Takeuchi H, Jin S, Wang J, Zhang G, Kawanokuchi J, Kuno R, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces neurotoxicity via glutamate release from hemichannels of activated microglia in an autocrine manner. J Biol Chem (2006) 281:21362–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600504200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Choi DW. Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system. Neuron (1988) 1:623–34. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Sriram K, Matheson JM, Benkovic SA, Miller DB, Luster MI, O’callaghan JP. Mice deficient in TNF receptors are protected against dopaminergic neurotoxicity: implications for Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J (2002) 16:1474–6. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0216fje

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Kaushal V, Schlichter LC. Mechanisms of microglia-mediated neurotoxicity in a new model of the stroke Penumbra. J Neurosci (2008) 28:2221–30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5643-07.2008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Triviño JJ, Von Bernhardi R. The effect of aged microglia on synaptic impairment and its relevance in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem Int (2021) 144:104982. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.104982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Wang XS, Zhang ZR, Zhang XR, Chen SY, Shao B, Xie CL. Modulation of CaMKIIa-GluN2B interaction in levodopa-induced dyskinesia in 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinson’s rats. BioMed Pharmacother (2018) 107:769–76. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Shen W, Ren W, Zhai S, Yang B, Vanoye CG, Mitra A, et al. Striatal Kir2 K+ channel inhibition mediates the antidyskinetic effects of amantadine. J Clin Invest (2020) 130:2593–601. doi: 10.1172/JCI133398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Calvello R, Cianciulli A, Nicolardi G, De Nuccio F, Giannotti L, Salvatore R, et al. Vitamin D treatment attenuates neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease, shifting M1 to M2 microglia responses. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2017) 12:327–39. doi: 10.1007/s11481-016-9720-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Lane EL, Soulet D, Vercammen L, Cenci MA, Brundin P. Neuroinflammation in the generation of post-transplantation dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis (2008) 32:220–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.06.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Kim YS, Joh TH. Microglia, major player in the brain inflammation: their roles in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Mol Med (2006) 38:333–47. doi: 10.1038/emm.2006.40

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Takaki J, Fujimori K, Miura M, Suzuki T, Sekino Y, Sato K. L-glutamate released from activated microglia downregulates astrocytic L-glutamate transporter expression in neuroinflammation: the ‘collusion’ hypothesis for increased extracellular L-glutamate concentration in neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflamm (2012) 9:275. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-275

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Beppu K, Kosai Y, Kido MA, Akimoto N, Mori Y, Kojima Y, et al. Expression, subunit composition, and function of AMPA-type glutamate receptors are changed in activated microglia; possible contribution of GluA2 (GluR-B)-deficiency under pathological conditions. Glia (2013) 61:881–91. doi: 10.1002/glia.22481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Shi P, Li Z, He T, Li N, Xu X, Yu P, et al. Astrocyte-selective STAT3 knockdown rescues methamphetamine withdrawal-disrupted spatial memory in mice via restoring the astrocytic capacity of glutamate clearance in dCA1. Glia (2021) 69:2404–18. doi: 10.1002/glia.24046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Morales I, Rodriguez M. Self-induced accumulation of glutamate in striatal astrocytes and basal ganglia excitotoxicity. Glia (2012) 60:1481–94. doi: 10.1002/glia.22368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Shi H, Yang X, Zhao H, Zhang S, Zu J, Zhang W, et al. Ranitidine reduced levodopa-induced dyskinesia by remodeling neurochemical changes in hemiparkinsonian model of rats. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat (2015) 11:1331–7. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S80174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Paz RM, Tubert C, Stahl A, Díaz AL, Etchenique R, Murer MG, et al. Inhibition of striatal cholinergic interneuron activity by the Kv7 opener retigabine and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. Neuropharmacology (2018) 137:309–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Cesaroni V, Blandini F, Cerri S. Dyskinesia and Parkinson’s disease: animal model, drug targets, and agents in preclinical testing. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2022) 26:837–51. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2022.2153036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Rentsch P, Stayte S, Egan T, Clark I, Vissel B. Targeting the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in a mouse model of l-dopa induced dyskinesia. Neurobiol Dis (2020) 134:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104646

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Bresink I, Danysz W, Parsons CG, Mutschler E. Different binding affinities of NMDA receptor channel blockers in various brain regions–indication of NMDA receptor heterogeneity. Neuropharmacology (1995) 34:533–40. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00017-Z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Bartlett MJ, Flores AJ, Ye T, Smidt SI, Dollish HK, Stancati JA, et al. Preclinical evidence in support of repurposing sub-anesthetic ketamine as a treatment for L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Exp Neurol (2020) 333:113413. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Bresink I, Danysz W, Parsons CG, Mutschler E. Different binding affinities of NMDA receptor channel blockers in various brain regions—Indication of NMDA receptor heterogeneity. Neuropharmacology (1995) 34:533–40. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00017-Z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Sherman SJ, Estevez M, Magill AB, Falk T. Case reports showing a long-term effect of subanesthetic ketamine infusion in reducing L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias. Case Rep Neurol (2016) 8:53–8. doi: 10.1159/000444278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Pottenger AE, Bartlett MJ, Sherman SJ, Falk T, Morrison HW. Evaluation of microglia in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease primed with L-DOPA after sub-anesthetic ketamine treatment. Neurosci Lett (2021) 765:136251. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Delamarre A, Tison F, Li Q, Galitzky M, Rascol O, Bezard E, et al. Assessment of plasma creatine kinase as biomarker for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) (2019) 126:789–93. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02015-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Yan J, Xu Y, Zhu C, Zhang L, Wu A, Yang Y, et al. Simvastatin prevents dopaminergic neurodegeneration in experimental parkinsonian models: the association with anti-inflammatory responses. PloS One (2011) 6:e20945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Azar YO, Badawi GA, Zaki HF, Ibrahim SM. Agmatine-mediated inhibition of NMDA receptor expression and amelioration of dyskinesia via activation of Nrf2 and suppression of HMGB1/RAGE/TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB signaling cascade in rotenone lesioned rats. Life Sci (2022) 311:121049. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.121049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Li X, Zhu J, Tian L, Ma X, Fan X, Luo L, et al. Agmatine protects against the progression of sepsis through the imidazoline I2 receptor-ribosomal S6 kinase 2-nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway. Crit Care Med (2020) 48:e40–7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, neuroinflammation, Parkinson’s disease, levodopa, levodopa-induced dyskinesia

Citation: Zhang F, Liu M, Tuo J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Yu C and Xu Z (2023) Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: interplay between the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor and neuroinflammation. Front. Immunol. 14:1253273. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1253273

Received: 05 July 2023; Accepted: 22 September 2023;
Published: 04 October 2023.

Edited by:

Ramkumar Mathur, University of North Dakota, United States

Reviewed by:

Paola Bonsi, Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
Francisney Pinto Nascimento, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Liu, Tuo, Zhang, Zhang, Yu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jun Zhang, 2352332385@qq.com; Changyin Yu, yuchangyin6812@126.com; Zucai Xu, docxzc@126.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.