Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 23 May 2023
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Immunomodulatory Factors, Conversion, and Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Hepatobiliary Tumors Based on Immunotherapy View all 5 articles

Editorial: Immunomodulatory factors, conversion, and postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatobiliary tumors based on immunotherapy

  • Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the second leading cause of cancer death in China and worldwide (1). Surgical resection remains the most effective radical treatment method, but the resection rate is as low as 20%-30% in clinical practice due to late diagnosis and delayed treatment in most HCC patients, which contributes to the poor prognosis of HCC. Even with radical resection for early-stage HCC, the recurrence rate is still high, especially for those with microvascular invasion. How to prevent HCC recurrence is more important for long-term outcomes (2). Notably, improving HCC prognosis though surgical technique is unrealistic nowadays. Immunotherapy has ushered in a new era in the systemic treatment of advanced HCC in the past few years (3). Immunotherapy may manipulate the immune system to recognize and attack tumor cells and has displayed promising clinical effects in the treatment of advanced HCC. However, the low objective response rate and therapy resistance still represent major challenges for immunotherapy. There is an urgent need to find biomarkers to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy and to screen out the sensitive population. Furthermore, conversion therapies are advocated to facilitate subsequent resection for selected patients with technically unresectable BCLC stage A HCC or technically resectable BCLC stage C HCC in China (4). The current Research Topic mainly focuses on the critical role of immunotherapy in the treatment of HCC and investigates the therapeutic predictors of immunotherapy. In addition, it also elucidates the immunomodulatory effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on immunotherapy and identifies the appropriate patients, which may provide promising strategies in targeted therapy and immunotherapy of HCC.

HCC recurs in 70–80% of cases following potentially curative treatments, and the immune microenvironment of the liver plays a key role in tumor recurrence. There is no proven postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC after curative resection. The time to HCC recurrence after curative resection is an important prognostic factor; early recurrence appears to be associated with poorer prognosis compared with those with late recurrence. Therefore, how to reduce early recurrence is of great importance for prolonging the overall survival time for HCC patients following curative resection. Previous studies indicated that microvascular invasion (MVI) is an independent risk factor for early recurrence (5). A recent randomized, open-label, multicenter trial indicated that postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) significantly improved the disease-free survival (DFS) benefits with acceptable toxicities in HCC patients with MVI (the median DFS was 20.3 months in the treatment group versus 10.0 months in the control group) (6). An ongoing phase III trial (IMbrave 050) evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in high-risk HCC after curative resection or ablation, and the preliminary results are positive (7). More evidence is needed on the strategies of postoperative adjuvant treatments in the future in order to shed new light on ways to improve the surgical prognosis of HCC patients.

More than half of HCC patients are diagnosed with advanced stages in China, of which macrovascular invasion (MaVI) is one of the most common signs. The main type of MVI is portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and the incidence in HCC patients is 44%–62.2% (8). Nearly all the international guidelines recommend non-surgical treatments, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapy, as the first-line treatment for HCC patients with PVTT (BCLC stage C and CNLC stage IIIa). However, quite a few HCC patients with MaVI can undergo surgical resection and achieve superior survival results compared with non-surgical treatments. Under the circumstances, the Chinese HCC guideline recommends that surgical resection should be considered if the PVTT can be completely removed during the operation, followed by postoperative local or systemic therapy to prevent recurrence (4). Systemic therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and locoregional treatments including TACE, HAIC, and radiation have been widely recommended for the treatment of those HCC patients with advanced stages to achieve survival benefit. These comforting results of survival benefit have been associated with relatively satisfactory objective response rates reflecting a significant reduction in tumor burden. Due to these advances in systemic treatments,a hot discussion has been prompted regarding their role in conversion therapy prior to liver resection. HAIC, TACE, and radiation therapy are also candidates for conversion therapy in advanced HCC or unresectable HCC and are currently gaining increasing attention as good combination methods with immunotherapy due to their role in modulating the tumor microenvironment. Previous studies reported that the conversion resection rate based on these combination therapies ranged from 20% to 50% (4). Nonetheless, the long-term survival benefit for liver resection after conversion therapy remains to be further evaluated in the future.

Not all HCC patients can benefit from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. A considerable number of HCC patients displays primary resistance to immunotherapy and might benefit from antiangiogenics, either alone or in combination with immunotherapy. The reported objective response rates based on immunotherapy range from 30% to 50% for HCC patients (4). Therefore, more and more studies are focusing on looking for predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy (9, 10). Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in HCC cells received the most attention in previous studies. However, PD-L1 expression alone has limited predictive value for immunotherapy in HCC. Thus, subsequent studies indicated that tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor characteristics, and microsatellite status were independent predictive biomarkers (10). Despite tumor tissue being the preferred source in evaluating these characteristics, liquid biopsy may overcome the matter of unrepeatable nature for tissue assessment and track tumor changes, which is applied in some medical centers. Recently, tumor genetic phenotypes, tumor microenvironment features, gut microbiome, and systemic inflammation have all been potential predictors of response to immunotherapy, and they are awaiting further validation in the clinical setting.

Moreover, the immunomodulatory mechanisms of TKIs and local treatments on various immune cells and their synergistic effects for HCC treatment remain to be further elucidated. Identification of the effective predictors response to immunotherapy and reasonable selection of a combination therapy base on immunotherapy will facilitate treatment allocation at each stage of HCC. Perhaps in the near future, palliative liver resection for advanced HCC could become a reality.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for all the contributors.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Li J, Yang F, Li J, Huang ZY, Cheng Q, Zhang EL. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion. World J Gastrointest Surg (2023) 15:19–31. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fabrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado A, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol (2022) 76:681–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xie DY, Zhu K, Ren ZG, Zhou J, Fan J, Gao Q. A review of 2022 Chinese clinical guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr (2023) 12:216–28. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang EL, Cheng Q, Huang ZY, Dong W. Revisiting surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion. Front Oncol (2021) 11:691354. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.691354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li SH, Mei J, Cheng Y, Li Q, Wang QX, Fang CK, et al. Randomized study. J Clin Oncol (2023) 41:1898–908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hack SP, Spahn J, Chen M, Cheng AL, Kaseb A, Kudo M, et al. IMbrave 050: a phase III trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection or ablation. Future Oncol (2020) 16:975–89. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lu J, Zhang XP, Zhong BY, Lau WY, Madoff DC, Davidson JC, et al. Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis: comparing east and west. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol (2019) 4:721–30. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30178-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cammarota A, Zanuso V, Manfredi GF, Murphy R, Pinato DJ, Rimassa L. Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: how will it reshape treatment sequencing? Ther Adv Med Oncol (2023) 15:17588359221148029. doi: 10.1177/17588359221148029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhu AX, Abbas AR, de Galarreta MR, Guan Y, Lu S, Koeppen H, et al. Molecular correlates of clinical response and resistance to atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Med (2022) 28:1599–611. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01868-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, conversion therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy

Citation: Zhang E-l (2023) Editorial: Immunomodulatory factors, conversion, and postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatobiliary tumors based on immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 14:1218845. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1218845

Received: 08 May 2023; Accepted: 15 May 2023;
Published: 23 May 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Zong Sheng Guo, University at Buffalo, United Sates

Copyright © 2023 Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Er-lei Zhang, baiyu19861104@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.