Zheng Yan
Shuna Yao1
Zhizhong Wang
Zhihua Yao
Yanyan Liu- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
- 2Department of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is the most common subtype of T/NK-cell lymphoma in Asia and Latin America, but very rare in North American and Europe. Patient survival has improved significantly over the past two decades. However, standard treatment has not yet been established, although dozens of prospective trials have been conducted. To help understand how the treatment of ENKTCL has evolved in the past and what trends lie ahead, we have comprehensively reviewed the treatment of this aggressive malignancy, with a particular focus on neglected or unanswered issues, such as the optimal staging method, the best partner of asparaginase (Asp), the individualized administration of Asp, the preferred sequence of CT and RT and so on. Overall, the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with Ann Arbor stage I/II disease increased from < 50% in the early 20th century to > 80% in recent years, and the median OS of patients with Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease increased from < 1 year to more than 3 years. The improvement in patient survival is largely attributable to advances in radiation technology and the introduction of Asp and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy into practice. Radiotherapy is essential for patients with early-stage disease, while Asp-based chemotherapy (CT) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage disease. ENKTCL management is trending toward simpler regimens, less toxicity, and higher efficacy. Novel drugs, such as manufactured T cells, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecule inhibitors, are being intensively investigated. Based on the fact that ENKTCL is highly resistant to cytotoxic drugs except Asp, and aggressive CT leads to higher toxicity rather than better outcomes, we recommend it is unnecessary to expend additional resources to compare different combinations of Asp with cytotoxic agents. Instead, more efforts should be made to optimize the use of Asp and immunotherapy to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity, explore ways to overcome resistance to Asp and immunotherapy, identify novel treatment targets, and define subpopulations who may benefit more from specific treatments.
1 Introduction
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is a unique hematological malignant entity characterized by universal extranodal involvement and invariable Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The disease has a distinctive ethnic and geographic distribution. It is more common in East Asia and Latin America, but remarkably rare in other regions. ENKTCL is the most common T/NK-cell lymphoma subtype in Asia and Latin America. According to the latest data reported by the International Cooperative Non-Hodgkin T-cell Lymphoma Prospective Registry study (ICT study), ENKTCL accounted for 28.6% of T/NK-cell lymphomas in Asia during 2016-2019 (1). Relatively, the frequency is as high as 40-50% in Mexico (2, 3) and 8% in Europe and the United States (4).
ENKTCL most commonly originates from the mucosa of nasal cavity and adjacent structures, namely the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) including the nasopharynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, and hypopharynx, resulting in destructive facial lesions. Other organs and tissues, such as skin, bones, digestive tract, lungs, liver, and reproductive organs, may also be involved in a small number of newly diagnosed cases and a large number of relapsed/refractory (R/R) cases. At presentation, most cases (70-90%) have UAT involvement and Ann Arbor stage I/II disease (1, 5–7).
Survival of patients with ENKTCL has improved significantly over the past two decades, and there is a consensus that for early-stage disease, radiotherapy (RT) is essential; for advanced-stage disease, Asp-based chemotherapy (CT) is superior to Asp-absent CT. Despite better patient outcomes and dozens of prospective studies, standard treatment has not been established. The reason is that most of these clinical trials had small sample sizes and focused on the efficacy evaluation of Asp in combination with different CT regimens. Further, many important questions remain unanswered, such as what is the best way to stage the disease? How to select patients with early-stage disease who do not require CT? How to optimize the efficacy of Asp-based CT? Which drug works best in combination with Asp? What is the optimal order for RT and CT? How many courses of CT are required for patients with early-stage disease? How to identify patients more likely to benefit from personalized treatment?
To help understand how treatments for ENKTCL have evolved in the past and where they may go in the future, and to help conduct well-designed clinical trials to accelerate the establishment of standard care, we comprehensively reviewed progress in the treatment of this disease over the past two decades. In particular, we mainly focused on several neglected or unanswered issues in the treatment of ENKTCL, including the optimal staging method, the best partner of Asp, the individualized administration of Asp, the preferred sequence of CT and RT and so on. The pathologic and genetic features of this disease have recently been well reviewed by others (8–10). When analyzing the outcomes of patients treated with different approaches or modalities, we visualized the data using figures, as most data are from retrospective studies with small cohorts and heterogenous treatments, which are difficult to compare directly.
2 Milestones in ENKTCL recognition and treatment
The condition of progressive necrotizing granuloma of the nasal cavity was first described in 1897, causing rapid invasion of the nose and face (midline) (11, 12). The disease was named in early literature as “malignant granuloma of nose”, “progressive lethal granulomatous ulceration of the nose”, “lethal midline granuloma”, and “granuloma gangraenescens” based on clinical characteristics (13), or “polymorphic reticulosis” and “angiocentric lymphoma” based on pathological characteristics (14). In 1982, it was recognized as a type of T-cell lymphoma (15). The association of this disease with EBV was first reported in 1985 (16). In 1987, The disease was identified as originating from NK cells (17). The revised European-American Lymphoma (REAL) classification, published in 1994, first presented this disease as a distinct subtype of malignant lymphoma called “angiocentric lymphoma” (18). A workshop in the same year comparing T-cell lymphoma in Asian and Western countries concluded that nasal T-/NK cell lymphoma, also called angiocentric lymphoma, is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. The workshop proposed nasal T-/NK cell lymphoma for midline facial lesions and nasal-type T-/NK cell lymphoma for tumors in other anatomic sites (19). The 2001 WHO classification named this entity as “extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type” (20) and later, in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of haematolymphoid tumors in 2022, “extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type” was renamed “extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma”.
Before the 1920s, surgery, antibiotics, and steroids had been used to treat ENKTCL, but all had failed. Durable responses were not observed until the use of RT (radium implantation in 1921 and X-rays in 1925) (12, 21, 22). Since then, RT has been increasingly used in practice. For CT, responses were anecdotally observed in patients treated with the antimetabolite methotrexate in 1964 (23). However, CT has been an adjuvant therapy for a long time due to its low response rate and rapid development of drug resistance. This state persisted until the introduction of L-asparaginase (L-Asp). The first case of L-Asp-induced complete response (CR) in refractory ENKTCL was reported in 1986 (24). In 2005, ENKTCL cells were found to be selectively sensitive to L-Asp (25), but long-term survivors were still rare in patients with advanced-stage disease until the introduction of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) blockade immunotherapy in recent years. PD-1 blockade was reported to be highly active in relapsed/refractory (R/R) ENKTCL patients in 2017 (26) and later used to treat newly diagnosed early-stage disease in 2022 (27). The milestones in the recognition and treatment of ENKTCL are summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Milestones in the recognition (shown in yellow below the timeline) and treatment (shown in green above the timeline) of ENKTCL.
3 Survival trend of patients with ENKTCL in the past two decades
ENKTCL is one of the tumors with the most dramatic change in survival over the past 20 years. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with Ann Arbor stage I/II disease has increased from < 50% in the early 2000s to > 80% in recent years. Survival data for early-stage disease published since 2000 are summarized in Figure 2. Here, we included only patients treated with RT or RT plus CT because RT is essential for early-stage disease. The improved survival can be attributed to several factors: the accumulation of knowledge about the biological behavior of the disease, accurate staging with modern photographic techniques, advances in RT techniques, and the introduction of Asp-based CT. Significant changes in survival were also seen in patients with advanced-stage disease. The median OS for advanced-stage disease has increased from a few months to more than 3 years. The better prognosis in advanced-stage disease is largely attributable to the introduction of Asp and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy. Data of advanced-stage disease published since 2000 are summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 2 Survival trends of patients with Ann Arbor stage I/II ENKTCL over the past two decades. Only data from patients treated with RT or RT plus CT are included. The area of each marker in the figure indicates the sample size of the study. Data are cited from (27–97).
Figure 3 Complete response (CR) rate and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with Ann Arbor stage III/IV or relapsed/refractory ENKTCL treated with different drug types. Asp, asparaginase; Asp-R, asparaginase-resistant; Anth, anthracycline; Anth-R, anthracycline-resistant; CT, chemotherapy; TN, treatment naïve; OS, overall survival (when PFS is not available, OS is displayed); y, year; H, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The area of each marker in the figure indicates the sample size of the study. Data are cited from (35, 68, 69, 72, 73, 82, 84, 94, 98–114).
4 The role of Asp in ENKTCL treatment
4.1 Asp is a game changer
ENKTCL is known to be resistant to conventional CT. In most reports, the CR rate in patients treated with anthracycline (Anth)-based CT was around 30% (29, 43, 46, 93). The resistance of ENKTCL to multiple cytotoxic drugs was initially attributed to the expression of P-glycoproteins (P-gp) on tumor cells (115). However, ENKTCL is also extremely resistant to P-gp independent agents such as methotrexate and cytarabine (25), and the response and survival of patients treated with P-gp independent agents are disappointing. In Anth-resistant ENKTCL patients treated with gemcitabine-based CT, the CR rate and median progression-free survival (PFS) were only 20% and 2.3 months, respectively (116). Further, in two prospective studies, the CR rates in patients with stage III/IV or Anth-resistant disease treated with the IMEP regimen (ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisone) were 8% and 32%, respectively (35, 99). The absolute efficacy of CT is clearly demonstrated in patients with advanced-stage disease (Figure 3). We can see that the efficacy of non-Anth/Asp-based CT is as poor as the efficacy of Anth-based CT.
However, CR rates with Asp-based CT range from 40% to 70% in most reports, both in early-stage or advanced-stage disease, and in treatment naive or Anth-resistant disease (Figure 3). A multicenter retrospective study from the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group analyzed data from 286 newly diagnosed advanced-stage ENKTCL cases and found that patients treated with Asp-containing CT had a significantly higher CR rate (45.5% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.006), 5-year PFS (34.2% vs. 17.1%, P < 0.001), and OS (45.3% vs. 27.8%, P < 0.001) than those treated with Asp-absent CT (110). The superiority of Asp-based CT over non-Asp-based CT is convincing enough through historical comparison, despite the lack of randomized controlled trials (Figure 3). This conclusion is also supported by systemic reviews and meta-analyses (117).
4.2 Anti-lymphoma mechanism of Asp
The excellent anti-ENKTCL activity of Asp is attributed to its unique anti-tumor mechanism and the natural weakness of ENKTCL cells. Asparagine is a non-essential amino acid that can be synthesized enzymatically from aspartic acid and ammonia in all normal cells of our body in the presence of asparagine synthetase (AsnS). L-Asp, in contrast to AsnS, is an enzyme that selectively hydrolyzes the extracellular amino acid L-asparagine to L-aspartate and ammonia. L-Asp has been introduced for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) since the 1960s because ALL cells lack AsnS expression and depend on extracellular asparagine uptake for survival. When plasma asparagine is depleted by systemic L-Asp administration, intracellular protein biosynthesis ceases and ALL cells die. The low expression of AsnS in ALL cells is due to hypermethylation of the AsnS gene. The CpG island methylation status of the AsnS gene promoter is associated with Asp sensitivity and its hypomethylation status correlates with Asp resistance and is an adverse prognosticator of patient survival (118). ENKTCL cells are even more sensitive to L-Asp than ALL cells (25). L-Asp was first used in combination treatment of ENKTCL by Murase et al. in 1986 (24). Around 2000, several case reports showed that L-Asp monotherapy induced durable CR in patients with R/R ENKTCL (119–121). Yong et al. reported a cohort of 18 (7 early-stage and 11 advanced-stage) Anth-resistant ENKTCL patients treated with L-Asp, vincristine, and dexamethasone followed by RT (if applicable). The CR rate after CT was 55.6%, and the 5-year OS rate of the whole cohort was 55.6% (122). Subsequent in vivo studies by Ando et al. showed that NK-cell leukemia/lymphoma cell lines were selectively sensitive to L-Asp among multiple tested anti-cancer agents. Further examination of tumor samples revealed that AsnS mRNA expression levels in lymphoma cells were inversely corelated with clinical responses to L-Asp treatment (25). These findings were subsequently confirmed by other studies (123, 124). Obviously, ENKTCL has the similar biological property to ALL (Figure 4). Likewise, the low expression of AsnS gene in ENKTCL cells may be due to genome-wide DNA hypermethylation (125).
Figure 4 Overview of the mechanism of action of asparaginase (Asp) against NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL). Due to the lack of asparagine synthetase (AsnS), NKTCL cells depend on the uptake of extracellular L-asparagine from the circulation (pathway ①) for protein synthesis. Administration of Asp hydrolyzes serum asparagine to aspartic acid and ammonia (NH3), thereby inhibiting tumor cell protein synthesis and ultimately leading to tumor cell death. In contrast, all normal cells in the body have two pathways to obtain L-asparagine for protein synthesis: taking extracellular L-asparagine from the circulation (pathway ①) and synthesizing their own L-asparagine from aspartic acid and NH3 via AsnS (pathway ②). When pathway ① is blocked, normal cells can still obtain adequate L-asparagine via pathway ② to meet their metabolic needs.
4.3 L-Asp and pegaspargase
The use of Asp in the treatment of ALL has been intensively studied. Its optimal therapeutic effect depends on complete and sustained depletion of serum asparagine (126). The serum half-life (t1/2) of native E. coli L-Asp is 1.25 days (127). When using native Asp, daily administration is unnecessary. Instead, it can be administered at 2- to 3-day intervals. It is crucial, however, that the drug should be administered throughout the treatment period to achieve a complete and sustained depletion of serum asparagine (126). If L-Asp is administered for 4 or 7 days at 3-week intervals, starved cancer cells may be revived by regaining asparagine during the Asp-absent intervals. This may explain, at least in part, the unsatisfactory outcomes in some studies using L-Asp. Currently, L-Asp is largely replaced by polyethylene glycol-conjugated Asp (pegaspargase, PEG-Asp). The serum t1/2 of PEG-Asp is 5.73 days, making it a 2-week dosing interval (127). The incidence of hypersensitivity to PEG-Asp is lower than that to native L-Asp (128).
Theoretically, both forms of Asp have similar anticancer activity, but in practice, L-Asp is inferior to PEG-Asp (Figure 5). Part of solid evidence comes from two prospective studies comparing L-Asp with PEG-Asp in patients with ENKTCL. One study by Kim et al. compared L-Asp vs. PEG-Asp in combination with the IMEP regimen in 41 newly diagnosed stage IV or Anth-resistant ENKTCL patients. L-Asp was delivered on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 of each cycle of CT, and PEG-Asp was given every 3 weeks. The results showed that the CR rate was higher in the PEG-Asp group (73.7% vs. 45.5%; P = 0.067) (129). In another recent randomized controlled study, 80 newly diagnosed ENKTCL patients were assigned to the DDGP (dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and PEG-Asp, repeated at 3-week intervals) arm or the SMILE (dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, etoposide, and L-Asp, L-Asp given at 3-week intervals on days 3 to 9) arm. The results showed that the 3-year PFS (56.6% vs. 41.8%, P = 0.004) and 5-year OS (74.3% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.02) in the DDGP arm were significantly higher than those in the SMILE arm (130). L-Asp-based CT was inferior to PEG-Asp-based CT, at least in part due to the long L-Asp dosing interval between two courses of CT. Besides, higher toxicity-related mortality in the second study was also responsible for the poorer outcome in the SMILE arm (17.5% in the SMILE arm vs. 2.5% in the DDGP arm).
Figure 5 OS trends in early-stage ENKTCL patients treated with different modalities. CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; Anth, anthracycline; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; Asp, asparaginase; PEG-Asp, pegaspargase; OS, overall survival. Data cited from (4, 27–32, 34–37, 39, 40, 42–46, 48–82, 84–97).
4.4 Individualized administration of Asp
The efficacy of Asp-based CT will be further enhanced if individualized treatment is given. The main disadvantages of Asp are hypersensitivity and silent inactivation, both of which are attributed to the production of neutralizing anti-Asp antibodies, occurring in 30-70% of patients during L-Asp treatment (131). Silent inactivation refers to the phenomenon of neutralizing antibodies being present in the absence of any clinical signs of allergy. Anti-Asp antibodies may result in faster Asp clearance, lower serum Asp concentrations, and higher risk of relapse (132, 133). PEG-Asp should not be given to patients who develop anti-E. coli Asp antibodies. Instead, Erwinia L-Asp which has different antigenic epitope to E. coli Asp is an alternative (134). For PEG-Asp, in addition to anti-Asp antibodies, there is another problem. Anti-PEG antibodies produced after PEG-Asp treatment can also lead to rapid Asp clearance and reduced efficacy (135). Moreover, Asp is essentially a protein that may have significantly different pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients of different races and ages. For example, the t1/2 of PEG-Asp is 7.1 days in South American adults and 5.73 days in Caucasian children (127, 136). Therefore, it is better to monitor the efficiency of asparagine depletion during treatment to achieve optimal efficacy and avoid ineffective medication.
Asp depletion efficiency can be evaluated by serum Asp concentration, presence of anti-Asp antibodies, and Asp activity. Relatively, Asp activity assay remains the best option in practice due to the lack of an anti-Asp antibody test that differentiates between inactivating or non-inactivating antibodies and the rapid ex vivo metabolism of asparagine in the presence of Asp (131). Currently, in the absence of detailed data on Asp metabolism in adult ENKTCL patients, the PEG-Asp activity monitoring algorithm proposed by Archie et al. can be adopted to optimize PEG-Asp dosing (137). Briefly, the algorithm consists of two steps: the first Asp activity monitoring is performed 4 - 7 days after PEG-Asp administration. Asp activity < 0.05 IU/mL indicates the presence of neutralizing antibodies, so treatment should be switched to Erwinia Asp. On the other hand, if Asp activity is ≥ 0.05 IU/mL, a second Asp activity monitoring should be performed 2 weeks after PEG-Asp administration. A second test result of < 0.025 IU/mL and a first test result of < 1.0 IU/mL indicate the presence of accelerated clearance, so the treatment should be switched to Erwinia Asp. If the second test result is < 0.025 IU/mL and the first test result is ≥ 1.0 IU/mL, or the second test level is between 0.025 and 0.1 IU/mL, there are three options: monitoring Asp activity after next dose, increasing PEG-Asp frequency, or switching to Erwinia Asp. If the second test level is ≥ 0.1 IU/mL, the scheduled PEG-Asp administration can be continued (Figure 6). For ENKTCL, if silent inactivation or hypersensitivity occurs and Erwinia L-Asp is not available, RT (for early-stage disease) or second-line treatment (for advance-stage disease) should be moved forward.
Figure 6 PEG-Asp activity monitoring algorithm for assessing possible silent inactivation by neutralizing antibodies and/or accelerated clearance (137).
In addition, the dose of PEG-Asp used in current practice may not be optimal. As Asp is an enzyme, when the substrate (asparagine) is saturated, the pharmacological effects (both efficacy and toxicity) of Asp do not change with increasing dose. This has been confirmed in practice. Kloons et al. conducted a trial to evaluate individualized dosing of PEG-Asp in pediatric ALL patients. They demonstrated that a median dose of 450 IU/m2 PEG-Asp was enough to achieve adequate Asp activity levels and sufficient asparagine depletion, and that the reduced dose of PEG-Asp had similar toxicity to the standard dose of PEG-Asp (138). More importantly, the frequency of Asp treatment matters. As noted above, optimal therapeutic efficacy of Asp depends on complete and sustained depletion of serum asparagine. When used in combination with other cytotoxic agents, PEG-Asp is usually repeated every 3 weeks. However, approximately 20% of patients are unable to maintain adequate levels of Asp activity in the third week of each 3-week interval (136), so PEG-Asp should be repeated every two weeks if Asp activity levels are not monitored (139).
4.5 Best partner of Asp
It seems that it does not matter which drugs are combined with Asp in combination therapy. On the one hand, ENKTCL is intrinsically resistant to cytotoxic agents other than Asp. On the other hand, there is no evidence that one combination is more favorable than the other, regardless of toxicity. To date, two randomized controlled studies have comparatively evaluated PEG-Asp-based regimens for ENKTCL, and both obtained similar efficacy across treatment arms (Table 1). Huang et al. reported preliminary results of P-GemOx (PEG-Asp, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin) + thalidomide vs. AspMetDex (PEG-Asp, methotrexate, and dexamethasone) at the 2019 ASH conference. They observed similar CR rates (60.0% vs. 55.0%), 3-year PFS and OS (detailed data not reported) between the two arms of 165 patients with newly diagnosed or R/R disease (143). Wei et al. compared SVILE (ifosfamide, PEG-Asp, vindesine, etoposide, and dexamethasone) with P-GemOx in 103 treatment-naïve patients. The CR rates after three cycles of CT (38.9% vs. 39.4% for early-stage disease, P = 0.789; 6.2% vs. 11.1% for advanced-stage disease, P = 1.000), 3-year PFS (88.3% vs. 93.9% for early-stage disease, P = 0.469; 46.2% vs. 65.7% for advanced-stage disease, P = 0.703), and 3-year OS (88.8% vs. 97.0% for early-stage disease, P = 0.130; 68.8% vs. 72.2% for advanced-stage disease, P = 0.729) were all similar between the two arms (69). In addition, Wang et al. treated 30 patients with PEG-Asp alone in a prospective phase 2 study. Two cycles of PEG-Asp were delivered concurrently with RT and 4 more cycles after RT. The results were excellent, with 2-year PFS of 90.9% and OS of 92.8% (67). Obviously, a more simplified regimen is more favorable when drug toxicity is considered. While this does not mean that those partners of the Asp scheme are of no values. A positive thought about Asp partners is that ENKTCL cells become sensitive to these partners when they are starved for asparagine deficiency following Asp administration. Based on the fact that aggressive chemotherapies result in higher toxicities rather than better efficacy, we can conclude that the highly toxic partners are unnecessary when combined with Asp. We suggest that more resource-consuming comparisons of Asp combination with different cytotoxic agents are unnecessary without the introduction of innovative concepts.
Table 1 Staging systems for ENKTCL.
5 Staging methods for ENKTCL
Staging is very important for ENKTCL because of its solid cancer features: the majority of patients present with early-stage disease and RT is a curative treatment; the extent of local tumor invasiveness (LTI) is the strongest prognosticator in patients with early-stage disease (7, 31, 144). It is believed that RT alone is sufficient for patients with very early-stage disease. However, there is no consensus on how to define very early-stage disease. Future randomized controlled trials may answer this question, but an appropriate staging method is a prerequisite.
The Ann Arbor system is by far the conventional and most widely used staging method. This staging method was originally designed for Hodgkin lymphoma with predominantly lymph node involvement and does not take into account the extent of LTI. However, ENKTCL is exclusively an extranodal lymphoma. When used to assess localized ENKTCL, the Ann Arbor system fails to indicate the extent of LTI to guide treatment decisions. To compensate for the shortcomings of the Ann Arbor system, three ENKTCL-specified staging systems have been proposed.
Kim et al. proposed a Korea staging system in 2009 to classify ENKTCL into limited disease and extensive disease (141). However, for extensive disease, the prognosis and treatment strategies for Ann Arbor stage I/II disease with LTI and disseminated disease are obviously different. Further, for limited disease, the prognosis of Ann Arbor stage I disease is obviously different from that of Ann Arbor stage II disease. Given the solid cancer features of ENKTCL, we previously proposed a TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) staging system (7). Obviously, locoregional disease is better stratified because this staging system is based solely on the extent of anatomical structures involved by the lymphoma. However, due to the complex anatomy of the UAT, this TNM staging system is too complex and inconvenient to use. Recently, the Chinese Southwest Oncology Group and the Asia Lymphoma Study Group (CA) proposed a staging method called the CA system. This method classifies Ann Arbor stage I disease into stage I or II based on the presence or absence of LTI, while stage III in CA system was identical to stage II in Ann Arbor system (142). A retrospective study comparing the CA system and the Ann Arbor system in 205 patients found that the CA system had better prognostic value than the Ann Arbor system (145). The CA system fully considers the prognostic value of both LTI and regional lymph node metastasis. Also, it is easy to use. However, CA stage II still includes a group of heterogeneous disease, as the extent of TLI varies greatly between patients, ranging from minimal to extensive infiltration around the UAT. Overall, among these staging methods (Table 2), the CA system is currently preferable, but the optimal staging method remains to be determined.
Table 2 Prospective randomized controlled studies in ENKTCL.
6 Treatment of early-stage ENKTCL
6.1 RT
The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for fit patients and RT alone for unfit patients with early-stage nasal ENKTCL. RT has an essential role in improved OS and PFS in patients with early-stage nasal ENKTCL (88, 146, 147). The 5-year OS rate in patients with early-stage disease treated with CT alone is only 12% to 45% (Figure 4) (4, 31, 32, 51, 59, 88, 91, 148). Emphatically, RT can’t be omitted in patients who have achieved CR after induction CT. According to a multicenter study by the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group (CLCG), for Ann Arbor stage I/II ENKTCL patients who reached CR after Asp-based CT, the 5-year OS was 84.9% and 58.9% in patients with and without RT, respectively (149).
During the early decades, patients receiving RT often had unsatisfactory outcomes due to the use of suboptimal radiation doses (34, 88). Patient outcomes did not improve significantly until the 1970s with the use of a higher dose of 50 Gy, which is recognized necessary to achieve long-term survival (88, 150). Modern RT for ENKTCL (including risk-adapted therapy, target volume, and dose guidelines) has been elaborately described by Qi et al. (151).
6.2 CT
In the Anth era, the 5-year OS was 47.3-83% in Ann Arbor stage I/II patients receiving RT alone (31–34, 37, 152–154) and 37.9-76% in those receiving combined CRT (29, 30, 32, 33, 37, 40, 46). There was no convincing evidence that adding CT to RT resulted in additional survival benefit (28, 30, 32, 33, 37, 40, 44, 152, 155, 156). However, this status has changed after the introduction of Asp. A randomized controlled study and a large cohort retrospective study both demonstrated the benefits of adding Asp-based CT. Zhang et al. randomized 65 patients with early-stage ENKTCL into RT alone group or DDGP (cisplatin, dexamethasone, PEG-Asp, and gemcitabine) followed by RT group. The 5-year PFS (56.5% vs. 82.9%, P = 0.023) and OS (60.4% vs. 85.7%, P = 0.040) were significant higher in the combined CRT group (Table 1) (77). Nevertheless, not all patients with early-stage disease can benefit from the addition of Asp-based CT. Zheng et al. evaluated the survival benefit of Asp-based vs. non-Asp-based CT plus RT in a retrospective cohort of 376 patients with early-stage ENKTCL. They stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups based on 5 clinical parameters (age > 60 years, stage II, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, poor performance status, and LTI), and found that Asp-based CT significantly improved 5-year OS in intermediate- and high-risk patients (84.4% vs. 74.5%, P = 0.014) (157). How to select patients who can benefit from the addition of Asp-based CT needs to be defined in randomized controlled studies. The survival trends in patient with early-stage ENKTCL treated with different types of CT are showed in Figure 5.
Another unanswered issue about CT is that how many CT courses are needed for early-stage ENKTCL. As shown in Table 3, most studies used 3 to 6 cycles of CT, and there is no evidence that short-course CT is inferior to long-course CT. A short-course of two cycles of modified SMILE CT and sequential RT in 18 cases with early-stage ENKTCL at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center showed a post-CT CR rate of 67% and a 5-year OS of 83.3% (162). The outcomes were similar to studies with long-course CT. The optimal number of CT courses needs to be determined in randomized controlled studies.
Table 3 Single arm prospective studies in NKTCL.
6.3 Combined modality treatment of CT and RT
There are 3 combined modalities of CT and RT for early-stage ENKTCL: sequential method (CT followed by RT, or RT followed by CT), sandwich method (CT before and after RT), and concurrent method (CT during the period of RT). There is no available evidence showing which modality is more preferable at the moment. The sequential and sandwich methods are mainly used in China, while concurrent method is mainly used in Japan and Korea. The development of sequential and sandwich modalities in the early days was based on the understanding that this aggressive tumor requires aggressive CT, which would not be tolerated when administered concurrently with RT.
In the Anth era, early disease progression frequently occurred in patients treated with induction CT due to resistance, so the importance of upfront RT was emphasized (57, 80, 163). However, increased risk of systemic relapse was also observed in patients receiving upfront RT (59). In the current Asp era, early disease progression is not a big concern as most patients are sensitive to Asp-based treatment. Two multicenter retrospective studies of large cohorts evaluated how the sequence of CT and RT affects outcomes of patients treated primarily with Asp-based CT. Based on data from 1,360 patients, the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group Study found that patients treated with CT followed by RT had similar survival to those treated with RT followed by CT (164). Kwong et al. compared sequential CRT vs. concurrent CRT in 303 cases and observed similar survival as well (165). The optimal sequence of CT and RT needs to be defined in randomized controlled studies.
In today’s view, aggressive CT is unnecessary for ENKTCL. Mild regimens, such as P-GemOx (GELOX) and DDGP, have equal or better efficacy and a more favorable safety profile than aggressive regimens (50, 69, 70, 130, 143). Given the trend towards more simplified CT, the feasibility of concurrent CRT should be reevaluated. Recent studies have showed that Asp alone or Asp combined with immunotherapy also yielded excellent efficacy in patients with early-stage ENKTCL when combined with RT (27, 67). These studies, although using small sample sizes, suggest that more simplified, more effective, and less toxic regimens are feasible.
6.4 Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy
Given the high activity in advanced-stage ENKTCL, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is being tried in early-stage disease. Sun et al. recently reported the results of a retrospective study of early-stage ENKTCL treated with PEG-Asp combined with a PD-1 inhibitor, anlotinib (a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China for lung cancer), and sequential RT. Patient outcomes were excellent, with 100% 3-year PFS and OS, but a limitation of the study was that only 8 patients were included (27). The role of anlotinib in this combination was unknown, but the combination of the two most powerful ENKTCL drugs (PEG-Asp and PD-1 inhibitor) deserves further investigation in more patients. A phase 2 trial of this regimen is pending (NCT03936452), and a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of PEG-Asp-based CRT with or without PD-1 blockade therapy in early-stage ENKTCL is ongoing (NCT04365036). Several studies are currently underway to examine the efficacy of more simplified immunotherapy-based treatment approaches in patients with early-stage ENKTCL: PD-1 inhibitor and PEG-Asp combined with RT (NCT04676789), PD-1 inhibitor, PEG-Asp, and chidamide combined with RT (NCT04414969), PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (NCT03728972), and PD-1 inhibitor concurrently with RT (NCT04417166, NCT05477264, and NCT05149170).
7 Treatment of advanced-stage and R/R ENKTCL
7.1 CT
The survival of patients with advanced-stage ENKTCL is extremely poor. The current NCCN guidelines recommend Asp-based CT for advanced-staged disease. As shown in Figure 3, the CR rate of patients treated with Asp-absent CT (including Anth- and non-Anth-based CT) ranged from 13.0% to 37.5%, and the 5-year OS ranged from 16.7% to 30.0%. The efficacy of Asp-based CT is better than that of Asp-absent CT, but it is still unsatisfactory. In a prospective cohort study of the International T-cell Project, including 166 patients from 40 centers in 14 countries across four continents (Asia, Europe, North America, and South America), the median OS was only 10 months (4). As in early-stage disease, aggressive CT in advanced-stage disease may result in greater toxicity rather than greater efficacy (166). The median OS was several months as well in patients treated with SMILE or modified SMILE regimen and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (162, 167). Patients with relapsed disease after front-line treatment had even worse survival. A multicenter retrospective study analyzing 179 patients with R/R ENKTCL from four countries found a median second OS of 6.4 months after relapse (168). Patients with extranasal ENKTCL had similar survival to those with advanced-stage nasal ENKTCL. The median OS was 2.83 to 9 months for gastrointestinal ENKTCL (169–172), 9.5 months for testicular disease (173), and 15.5 to 29 months for cutaneous ENKTCL (174, 175). These data indicate that extranasal ENKTCL should be managed like advanced-stage nasal ENKTCL.
7.2 HSCT
The role of HSCT in the treatment of ENKTCL is controversial. Auto-HSCT did not lead to better outcomes compared to Asp-based CT (176, 177). Several small cohort retrospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of allo-HSCT in patients with advanced-stage ENKTCL. A Japanese study of 28 patients (22 with NKTCL, 3 with blastic NK-cell lymphoma, and 3 with aggressive NK-cell leukemia) concluded that 2-year PFS and OS were 34% and 40%, respectively (178). In another study of 12 patients, 7 cases survived in remission with a median follow-up of 13 months (179). After investigating 18 patients with advanced-stage or R/R ENKTCL who underwent allo-HSCT, a multicenter study by the Asia Lymphoma Study Group observed 5-year PFS and OS of 51% and 57%, respectively (180). In a non-Asian cohort with 27 patients undergoing HSCT (14 with auto-HSCT and 13 with allo-HSCT), the 3-year OS was 64% for consolidative auto-HSCT in first-line treatment and 39% for allo-HSCT in salvage treatment (181). These data seem encouraging, but there was patient selection bias in these studies, as patients who received HSCT generally had favorable performance status and good response to previous treatment. Besides, it may not be better than Asp-based CT (Figure 3). There is no doubt that HSCT will move to late-line treatment with the increasing number of novel drugs today.
7.3 RT
Given the sensitivity of ENKTCL to RT, RT is used in selected patients with advanced-stage disease. According to the International T-cell Project, patients with advanced-stage disease receiving combined CRT had significantly better survival than those receiving CT alone (3-year OS, 66% vs. 24%; 5-year OS, 58% vs. 24%; both Ps < 0.001) (4). However, there was clearly a selection bias. Patients who received RT inevitably had lower tumor burden and better response to induction CT than those who did not receive RT. Nevertheless, it is suggested that RT can be delivered to selected patients with oligometastases.
7.4 Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy
The positive rate of PD-L1 in ENKTCL cells is 39-100% (8). Overexpression of PD-L1 induced by EBV infection, on the one hand, is a potential mechanism by which ENKTCL avoids immune surveillance (182, 183), on the other hand, is a predictor of favorable response to PD-1 blockade treatment (159, 160). Kwong et al. first reported that PD-1 blockade was highly active in R/R ENKTCL in a series of 7 cases (26). Its outstanding efficacy was subsequently confirmed in clinical trials. In a phase 2 study, 28 patients with Asp-resistant ENKTCL were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab. The CR rate and objective response rate (ORR) were 21.4% and 75%, respectively, and the 2-year OS was 78.6% (111). In another phase 2 trial of 78 cases with Asp-resistant ENKTCL treated with the anti-PD-L1 antibody sugemalimab, the CR was 37.2% and the 2-year OS was 54.6% (98). Clearly, the median second OS was > 2 years in both trials. The current NCCN guidelines recommend anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for Asp-resistant R/R ENKTCL. Promising results have also been observed in patients treated with immunotherapy combined with small molecule targeted drugs, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) (160, 184, 185). The combination of PD-1 inhibitor and HDACi chidamide was evaluated in a prospective phase Ib/II study in patients with Asp-resistant ENKTCL. The preliminary analysis of 37 cases showed that the CR rate, 1-year PFS, and OS was 44.4%, 66.0%, and 79.1%, respectively (160). The combined treatment showed activity even in patients with immunotherapy-resistant lymphoma, as HDACi also has immunomodulatory effects beyond anticancer effect (185, 186). Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of PD-1 blockade combined with a DNA demethylating inhibitor (DNMTi) (NCT04279379) or anti-CD38 antibody (NCT04763616) in R/R ENKTCL are ongoing.
Due to its high activity, immunotherapy has recently been used in the front-line treatment of advanced-stage disease. Cai et al. treated 9 newly diagnosed stage III/IV ENKTCL cases using a PD-1 inhibitor in combination with the P-GemOx regimen. The CR rate, 1-year PFS, and OS was 77.8%, 66.7%, and 100%, respectively (109). Although a small cohort retrospective study, it suggests that the combination of the two most powerful drugs (PEG-Asp and PD-1 blockade) may be a good option for front-line therapy of advanced-stage ENKTCL, and that aggressive CT may not be necessary in the modern era. Additional results of a prospective study (NCT04127227) of this combination treatment are pending. A more simplified regimen combing PD-1 blockade and PEG-Asp is currently being tested in prospective trials (NCT04096690 and NCT04004572) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage ENKTCL.
7.5 Other immunotherapies
ENKTCL patients are universally EBV positive, making the viral protein latent membrane proteins (LMP) interesting treatment targets. LMP-targeted therapy has shown encouraging activity in several studies. In a phase 2 study, Kim et al. created autologous EBV-specific T cells in 47 patients with advanced-stage or R/R ENKTCL. The CR rate was 30% in 10 R/R patients receiving the cell therapy (187). Bollard et al. treated 29 patients with EBV-related lymphoma using LMP-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The results showed that 11 of 21 patients with R/R disease achieved CR at the time of CTL infusion (188). Cho et al. treated 13 patients (11 early-stage patients and 2 advanced-stage patients) with EBV LMP-specific CTL cells when CR was achieved following CT, RT, and/or HSCT. The 4-year OS and PFS were 100% and 90%, respectively (189). Ando et al. developed an EBV-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived LMP-specific CTL that exhibited robust ENKTCL suppressive effects in vitro and in vivo (190). More clinical trials of EBV-targeted T cell therapy are underway (NCT03789617 and NCT03671850).
A subset of ENKTCL cells express CD30 and CD38, both of which have available targeted drugs. The anti-CD30 antibody conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been reported to be effective in individual cases (191, 192). In a BV phase 2 study of 33 patients with R/R CD30-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 7 had ENKTCL. One ENKTCL patient achieved CR and another ENKTCL patient achieved partial response (PR) (193). The current NCCN guidelines recommend BV monotherapy for Asp-resistant R/R ENKTCL. The combination of BV with PD-1 inhibition (NCT05316246) and anti-CD30 CAR-T therapy (NCT04952584, NCT04008394, and NCT04526834) are currently under investigation in patients with CD30+ R/R lymphocyte malignancies. The anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab has been examined in a phase 2 study in patients with R/R ENKTCL with an ORR of 25% and a median PFS of 53 days (161) (Table 3). Zhang et al. screened a panel of biomarkers (B7-H3, CD70, TIM-3, VISTA, ICAM-1, and PD-1) in NKTCL cell lines and found that B7-H3 (CD276) was highly and homogeneously expressed in these cells. Therefore, they constructed a novel anti-B7-H3/CD3 bispecific T-cell engaging antibody and B7-H3-redirected CAR-T cells, both of which showed antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo (194). CD7 is positive in 84.8% of patients with ENKTCL. In a recently reported phase 1 stage study of 20 cases with CD7-positive R/R T-ALL or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, 19 patients achieved bone marrow CR and 5 achieved extramedullary CR (195). A prospective trial of anti-CD7 CAR-T cell therapy in CD7-positive T-cell lymphoma (including ENKTCL) is ongoing (NCT04004637). ENKTCL is an IL-2-dependent cancer (196). The binding of IL-2 to IL2α (CD25) exerts pro-inflammatory effects and promotes lymphomagenesis and drug resistance (197, 198). Therefore, blocking IL2-CD25 binding is a potential therapeutic strategy. Wang et al. have launched a prospective trial after reporting a R/R ENKTCL patient who responded well to anti-CD25 antibody therapy (NCT04337593).
Among these immunotherapies under investigation, anti-LMP CAR-T therapy or EBV-specific T cell therapy might be the most promising treatment.
7.6 Small molecule drugs
Epigenetic modifiers, including MLL2, MLL3, BCOR, TET2, EP300, and ARID1A, are mutated in about 24.8% of cases with ENKTCL (9). Accordingly, epigenetic regulation is an important treatment strategy for this disease. The HDACi chidamide has been approved in China for the treatment of R/R PTCL, including ENKTCL. In a phase 2 study of chidamide in patients with R/R PTCL, the CR rate was 6% in 16 patients with ENKTCL (158). When two additional real world studies were included, the pooled CR rate was 16% (ORR 38%), involving a total of 115 R/R ENKTCL patients (158, 199, 200). Romidepsin and belinostat are HDAC inhibitors used in western countries. The current NCCN guidelines recommend HDACi for Asp-resistant R/R ENKTCL. The DNMTi azacytidine and decitabine are being actively tested in combination treatment in patients with R/R ENKTCL (NCT04899414 and NCT04279379). Moreover, common genetic aberrations (18.2%) in ENKTCL involve genes related to the JAK-STAT pathway (JAK3, JAK2, STAT3, STAT5B, SOCS1, and PTPRK). JAK or STAT activating mutations lead to constitutive activation of the JAK-SATAT pathway, which plays a major role in ENKTCL cell growth and survival (9, 201). These findings make JAK an interesting target for the treatment of ENKTC. The efficacy of JAK inhibitor in R/R T- and NK-cell lymphoma is currently under investigation (NCT02974647). Mutations in genes associated with the RAS-MAPK pathway (MAP3Ks, BRAF, and EPH1A) occur in 14.4% of ENKTCL cases (9). Alisertib, which targets aurora kinase A, a downstream molecule of MAPK, has been used in 5 cases of R/R ENKTCL as part of two studies, but only one patient achieved PR (202, 203). XPO1 is a promising target for the treatment of both hematological and non-hematological cancers (204, 205). Preliminary results from a phase Ib study of the XPO1 inhibitor ATG-010 plus CT in heavily pretreated patients with R/R PTCL and ENKTCL have been reported at the 2021 ASH meeting. ORR and CR were observed in 3 and 2 of the 5 ENKTCL cases analyzed, respectively (206). The final results of this trial are pending (NCT04425070). PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki) have demonstrated encouraging activity in R/R PTCL patients in multiple trials (207–209). Currently, several trials are assessing the efficacy and safety of PI3Ki combined with HDACi or other agents in patient with R/R PTCL, including ENKTCL (NCT05083208, NCT04774068, and NCT04639843). The above-mentioned targeted therapies are illustrated in Figure 7. In addition, deregulation of apoptosis through TP53 mutations provides a further growth advantage for this disease (210). Targeting the TP53-MDM2 interaction is also a potential treatment approach. MDM2 inhibitors are currently being tested intensely in various cancers, including lymphomas (211). To date, small molecule drugs, including HDACi, JAK inhibitor, aurora kinase A inhibitor, only demonstrated mild efficacy in T/NK-cell lymphomas. PI3Ki showed higher response rates than these drugs, but only limited data exist and long-term efficacy still need to be observed. At present and in the near future, these drugs might be choices in late line treatment or as partner drugs in combined treatment for ENKTCL.
Figure 7 Schematic illustration of targeted therapies in ENKTCL. Green indicates that the targeted therapies have been widely used in practice; cyan indicates that the therapies are being investigated in early-stage clinical trials; orange indicates that the therapies have shown activity in animal models; and red indicates that the therapies are currently under investigation in clinical trials.
8 Biomarkers for treatment decision making
8.1 Predictive markers
Biomarker-driven individualized and precision treatment is the way toward better efficacy, lower toxicity, and higher cost-performance. The genetic landscapes of ENKTCL have been described in several studies with relatively large sample sizes in recent years. DDX3X, TP53, BCOR, STAT3, and MLL2 are the most commonly mutated genes that act as tumor suppressors or epigenetic modifiers or participate in signaling pathways (JAK-STAT, NF-κB, and RAS-MAPK) (8, 212–215). TP53 mutation was identified as an adverse prognosticator in two studies (212, 214) and DDX3X in one study (212), but the predictive value of these genes was inconsistently reported in others (213, 215).
PD-L1 rearrangement is a marker of response to PD-1 blockade treatment. Lim et al. sequenced tumor samples from 19 R/R ENKTCL patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab. All 4 cases with complete and durable responses harbored PD-L1 rearrangement, while all 10 non-responders were wild-type PD-L1. Clearly, PD-L1 rearrangement is 100% specific in identifying responders to immunotherapy. In this study, PD-L1 expression levels were not associated with clinical response (216). However, higher PD-L1 expression levels did correlate with better immunotherapy response in two prospective studies (159, 160). The predictive value of PD-L1 rearrangement on clinical response needs to be verified in more patients.
8.2 Molecular subtypes of ENKTCL
Molecular subtyping may help identify patients more likely to benefit from a specific treatment. The following three studies explored the molecular subtyping of ENKTCL and are summarized in Table 4. Xiong et al. proposed a molecular subtyping scheme based on an integrated analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic features of ENKTCL. Patients were classified into three subtypes: HEA subtype, enriched in T cell gene expression and mutations in epigenetic regulators (EP300, HDAC9, and ARID1A); TSIM subtype, characterized by aberrations in tumor suppressors (TP53 mutation and del6q21) and immune modulators (JAK-STAT mutation/amplification and amp9p24.1/PD-L1/L2 locus); and MB subtype, enriched in MYC-associated aberrations, mainly MGA mutations, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the BRDT locus. This subtyping scheme has prognostic value in patients with advanced-stage disease and may have value in individualized treatment decision-making (213). Dong et al. classified ENKTCL as C1 to C7 based on genome-wide mutation and genomic copy number alteration analysis. According to this classification, patients in C5 and C7 have a good prognosis, while patients in C6 have the worst prognosis (214). Lim et al. generated a genomic prognostic model (GPM) based on next-generation sequence of 260 ENKTCL tumors in which mutations in 13 genes (BCOR, JAK3, KRAS, MYH11, DCC, ITK, NOTCH1, FAS, RET, BIRC3, MLLT1, LRP1B, and NRG1) were associated with poorer survival. The representative genomic alterations and prognostic values of subtypes vary largely among these studies. This discrepancy is at least partially attributable to the inclusion of patients with heterogeneous disease status (mixed early-stage and advanced-stage disease) and treatments. Future subtyping studies should be conducted in patients receiving homogeneous treatment.
Table 4 Molecular subtyping schemes of ENKTCL published in recent years.
In addition, Cho et al. developed an immune subtyping model that classifies ENKTCL into four tumor immune microenvironment subgroups using three immunohistochemical markers, FOXP3, PD-L1, and CD68. The four subgroups were named immune tolerance, immune evasion-A, immune evasion-B, and immune silenced. The response rate to pembrolizumab was 100% (1/1) in the immune tolerance group, 60% (3/5) in the immune evasion group, and 0 (0/5) in the immune-silenced group (217). This subtyping method may guide immunotherapy but needs to be verified in more patients.
9 Conclusions
Survival of ENKTCL patients has improved significantly in the past two decades, mainly due to the great advances in RT technology and the introduction of Asp and anti-PD-/PD-L1 immunotherapy. RT is essential for early-stage disease. Asp-based CT benefits a proportion of patients with early-stage disease. Asp and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are milestones in advanced-stage disease treatment. Their combination can further improve patient outcomes. The efficacy of Asp could be optimized by individualized administration. In the treatment of both early-stage and advanced-stage diseases, there is a trend toward more simplified regimens, less toxicity, and higher efficacy. Relevant clinical trials are currently underway. Small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and manufactured T cell therapies are under intensive investigation. EBV-targeted T cell therapies might be the most promising new treatment in the near future. In the future, there is no need to spend more resources comparing different combinations of Asp with cytotoxic agents. Instead, more efforts should be made to optimize the use of Asp and immunotherapy to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity, explore ways to overcome resistance to Asp and immunotherapy, determine the optimal combination therapy of CT and RT, identify novel treatment targets, and define subpopulations who may benefit more from specific treatments.
Author contributions
ZY, ZHY and YL: conceptualization and methodology. ZY and SY: data curation and formal analysis. ZW and WZ: software and visualization. ZY: original draft. YL and ZHY: supervision, project administration, review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Yoon SE, Song Y, Kim SJ, Yoon DH, Chen TY, Koh Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma in Asian patients: A multinational, multicenter, prospective registry study in Asia. Lancet Reg Health West Pac (2021) 10:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100126
2. Aviles A. Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. a comparative analysis of a Mexican population with the other populations of Latin-America. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis (2015) 7(1):e2015052. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2015.052
3. Hernandez-Ruiz E, Alvarado-Ibarra M, Juan Lien-Chang LE, Banda-Garcia L, Aquino-Salgado JL, Barragan-Ibanez G, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Mexico. World J Oncol (2021) 12(1):28–33. doi: 10.14740/wjon1351
4. Fox CP, Civallero M, Ko YH, Manni M, Skrypets T, Pileri S, et al. Survival outcomes of patients with extranodal natural-killer T-cell lymphoma: a prospective cohort study from the international T-cell project. Lancet Haematol (2020) 7(4):e284–e94. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30283-2
5. Yang Y, Wang Y, Liu X, He X, Zhang LL, Wu G, et al. Progression-free survival at 24 months and subsequent survival of patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a China lymphoma collaborative group (CLCG) study. Leukemia (2021) 35(6):1671–82. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01042-y
6. Kim TM, Lee SY, Jeon YK, Ryoo BY, Cho GJ, Hong YS, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a national survey of the Korean cancer study group. Ann Oncol (2008) 19(8):1477–84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn147
7. Yan Z, Huang HQ, Wang XX, Gao Y, Zhang YJ, Bai B, et al. A TNM staging system for nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. PloS One (2015) 10(6):e0130984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130984
8. Sun KM, Wong YH, Cheung KC, Yuen CM, Chan YT, Lai WJ, et al. Update on molecular diagnosis in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and its role in the era of personalized medicine. Diagnostics (Basel) (2022) 12(2). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020409
9. Kim H, Ko YH. The pathologic and genetic characteristics of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Life (Basel) (2022) 12(1). doi: 10.3390/life12010073
10. Montes-Mojarro IA, Fend F, Quintanilla-Martinez L. EBV and the pathogenesis of NK/T cell lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(6). doi: 10.3390/cancers13061414
11. McBride P. Photographs of a case of rapid destruction of the nose and face. 1897. J Laryngol Otol (1991) 105(12):1120. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100118407
12. Hargrove SW, Fodden JH, Rhodes AJ. Malignant granuloma of the nose. Lancet (1946) 2(6426):596–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(46)91056-2
13. Singh MM, Stokes JF, Drury RA, Walshe JM. The natural history of malignant granuloma of the nose. Lancet (1958) 1(7017):401–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(58)90717-7
14. Takahara M, Kumai T, Kishibe K, Nagato T, Harabuchi Y. Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: Genetic, biologic, and clinical aspects with a central focus on Epstein-Barr virus relation. Microorganisms (2021) 9(7). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071381
15. Ishii Y, Yamanaka N, Ogawa K, Yoshida Y, Takami T, Matsuura A, et al. Nasal T-cell lymphoma as a type of so-called "lethal midline granuloma". Cancer (1982) 50(11):2336–44. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821201)50:11<2336::AID-CNCR2820501120>3.0.CO;2-C
16. Vilde JL, Perronne C, Huchon A, Leport C, Gehanno P, Marche C, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus with lethal midline granuloma. N Engl J Med (1985) 313(18):1161. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198510313131816
17. Ng CS, Chan JK, Lo ST. Expression of natural killer cell markers in non-hodgkin's lymphomas. Hum Pathol (1987) 18(12):1257–62. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80410-0
18. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML, et al. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: A proposal from the international lymphoma study group. Blood (1994) 84(5):1361–92. doi: 10.1182/blood.V84.5.1361.1361
19. Jaffe ES, Chan JK, Su IJ, Frizzera G, Mori S, Feller AC, et al. Report of the workshop on nasal and related extranodal angiocentric T/Natural killer cell lymphomas. Definitions differential diagnosis Epidemiol Am J Surg Pathol (1996) 20(1):103–11. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199601000-00012
20. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman J. WHO classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 3rd ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press (2001).
21. McArthur GAD, Dew HR. Malignant granuloma of the nose. J Laryngol Otol (1925) 40:378–80. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100027481
22. Woods R. Observations ON MALIGNANT GRANULOMA OF THE NOSE. Br Med J (1921) 2(3159):65–6 1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.3159.65
23. Vonleden H, Schiff M. Antimetabolite therapy in midline lethal granuloma. Arch Otolaryngol (1964) 80:460–8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1964.00750040472016
24. Murase T, Suzuki M, Toyama K. [Complete remission obtained by sequential chemotherapy of l-asparaginase and continuous infusion of bleomycin (ABLE protocol) in a case of refractory diffuse large cell lymphoma of a paranasal origin]. Rinsho Ketsueki (1986) 27(2):252–6.
25. Ando M, Sugimoto K, Kitoh T, Sasaki M, Mukai K, Ando J, et al. Selective apoptosis of natural killer-cell tumours by l-asparaginase. Br J Haematol (2005) 130(6):860–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05694.x
26. Kwong YL, Chan TSY, Tan D, Kim SJ, Poon LM, Mow B, et al. PD1 blockade with pembrolizumab is highly effective in relapsed or refractory NK/T-cell lymphoma failing l-asparaginase. Blood (2017) 129(17):2437–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-12-756841
27. Sun P, Wang Y, Yang H, Chen C, Nie M, Sun XQ, et al. Combination of anti-PD-1 antibody, anlotinib and pegaspargase "Sandwich" with radiotherapy in localized natural Killer/T cell lymphoma. Front Immunol (2022) 13:766200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.766200
28. Kim GE, Lee SW, Chang SK, Park HC, Pyo HR, Kim JH, et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiation versus radiation alone in the management of localized angiocentric lymphoma of the head and neck. Radiother Oncol (2001) 61(3):261–9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00428-5
29. Kim WS, Song SY, Ahn YC, Ko YH, Baek CH, Kim DY, et al. CHOP followed by involved field radiation: is it optimal for localized nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma? Ann Oncol (2001) 12(3):349–52. doi: 10.1023/a:1011144911781
30. Cheung MM, Chan JK, Lau WH, Ngan RK, Foo WW. Early stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and the effect of treatment modality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2002) 54(1):182–90. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02916-4
31. You JY, Chi KH, Yang MH, Chen CC, Ho CH, Chau WK, et al. Radiation therapy versus chemotherapy as initial treatment for localized nasal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma: a single institute survey in Taiwan. Ann Oncol (2004) 15(4):618–25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh143
32. Li CC, Tien HF, Tang JL, Yao M, Chen YC, Su IJ, et al. Treatment outcome and pattern of failure in 77 patients with sinonasal natural killer/T-cell or T-cell lymphoma. Cancer (2004) 100(2):366–75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11908
33. Kim K, Chie EK, Kim CW, Kim IH, Park CI. Treatment outcome of angiocentric T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2005) 35(1):1–5. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi006
34. Isobe K, Uno T, Tamaru J, Kawakami H, Ueno N, Wakita H, et al. Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: the significance of radiotherapeutic parameters. Cancer (2006) 106(3):609–15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21656
35. Lee KW, Yun T, Kim DW, Im SA, Kim TY, Yoon SS, et al. First-line ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide and prednisolone chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy is active in stage I/II extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma (2006) 47(7):1274–82. doi: 10.1080/10428190600562823
36. Lee SH, Ahn YC, Kim WS, Ko YH, Kim K, Park K. The effect of pre-irradiation dose intense CHOP on anthracyline resistance in localized nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Haematologica (2006) 91(3):427–8.
37. Li YX, Yao B, Jin J, Wang WH, Liu YP, Song YW, et al. Radiotherapy as primary treatment for stage IE and IIE nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol (2006) 24(1):181–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2573
38. Lee J, Suh C, Park YH, Ko YH, Bang SM, Lee JH, et al. Extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type: a prognostic model from a retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol (2006) 24(4):612–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1384
39. Wang B, Lu JJ, Ma X, Guo Y, Lu H, Hong X, et al. Combined chemotherapy and external beam radiation for stage IE and IIE natural killer T-cell lymphoma of nasal cavity. Leuk Lymphoma (2007) 48(2):396–402. doi: 10.1080/10428190601059795
40. Ma HH, Qian LT, Pan HF, Yang L, Zhang HY, Wang ZH, et al. Treatment outcome of radiotherapy alone versus radiochemotherapy in early stage nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Med Oncol (2010) 27(3):798–806. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9288-7
41. Yamaguchi M, Suzuki R, Kwong YL, Kim WS, Hasegawa Y, Izutsu K, et al. Phase I study of dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, l-asparaginase, and etoposide (SMILE) chemotherapy for advanced-stage, relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma and leukemia. Cancer Sci (2008) 99(5):1016–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00768.x
42. Kim SJ, Kim K, Kim BS, Kim CY, Suh C, Huh J, et al. Phase II trial of concurrent radiation and weekly cisplatin followed by VIPD chemotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE, nasal, extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Consortium for improving survival of lymphoma study. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27(35):6027–32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8592
43. Huang H, Lin Z, Lin X, Cai Q, Xia Z, Jiang W. Long-term outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma treated by etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin regimen: a single-institution experience. Leuk Lymphoma (2011) 52(6):1041–8. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.561388
44. Li YX, Liu QF, Wang WH, Jin J, Song YW, Wang SL, et al. Failure patterns and clinical implications in early stage nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma treated with primary radiotherapy. Cancer (2011) 117(22):5203–11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26167
45. Jiang M, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Yang Q, Xie L, Liu W, et al. Phase 2 trial of "sandwich" l-asparaginase, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy with radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer (2012) 118(13):3294–301. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26629
46. Wang L, Xia ZJ, Huang HQ, Lu Y, Zhang YJ. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in the treatment of stage IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type: 13-year follow-up in 135 patients. Int J Hematol (2012) 96(5):617–23. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1174-y
47. Lee J, Cho SG, Chung SM, Ryu MR, Kim SH, Jang HS, et al. Retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKL), nasal type, stage I-IIE: single institute experience of combined modality treatment for early localized nasal extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKL). Ann Hematol (2013) 92(3):333–43. doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1630-z
48. Lee J, Kim CY, Park YJ, Lee NK. Sequential chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage I/II extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Blood Res (2013) 48(4):274–81. doi: 10.5045/br.2013.48.4.274
49. Lin N, Song Y, Zheng W, Tu M, Xie Y, Wang X, et al. A prospective phase II study of l-asparaginase- CHOP plus radiation in newly diagnosed extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. J Hematol Oncol (2013) 6:44. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-44
50. Wang L, Wang ZH, Chen XQ, Li YJ, Wang KF, Xia YF, et al. First-line combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and l-asparaginase (GELOX) followed by involved-field radiation therapy for patients with stage IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer (2013) 119(2):348–55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27752
51. Aviles A, Neri N, Fernandez R, Huerta-Guzman J, Nambo MJ. Combined therapy in untreated patients improves outcome in nasal NK/T lymphoma: results of a clinical trial. Med Oncol (2013) 30(3):637. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0637-1
52. Ke QH, Zhou SQ, Du W, Liang G, Lei Y, Luo F, et al. Concurrent IMRT and weekly cisplatin followed by GDP chemotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE Nasal, extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Blood Cancer J (2014) 4:e267. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.88
53. Kim SJ, Yang DH, Kim JS, Kwak JY, Eom HS, Hong DS, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by l-asparaginase-containing chemotherapy, VIDL, for localized nasal extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma: CISL08-01 phase II study. Ann Hematol (2014) 93(11):1895–901. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2137-6
54. Kim TM, Kim DW, Kang YK, Chung J, Song HS, Kim HJ, et al. A phase II study of ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone for previously untreated stage I/II extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a multicenter trial of the Korean cancer study group. Oncologist (2014) 19(11):1129–30. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0305
55. Tsai HJ, Lin SF, Chen CC, Chen TY, Su WC, Hwang WL, et al. Long-term results of a phase II trial with frontline concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for localized nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol (2015) 94(2):130–7. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12405
56. Wang H, Wuxiao ZJ, Zhu J, Wang Z, Wang KF, Li S, et al. Comparison of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and l-asparaginase and etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and prednisone as first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IE to IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective study. Leuk Lymphoma (2015) 56(4):971–7. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.939964
57. Zang J, Li C, Luo SQ, Wang JH, Xu M, Zhao LN, et al. Early radiotherapy has an essential role for improving survival in patients with stage I-II nasal-type of NK/T cell lymphoma treated with l-asparaginase-containing chemotherapy–a single institution experience. Ann Hematol (2015) 94(4):583–91. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2244-4
58. Michot JM, Mazeron R, Danu A, Lazarovici J, Ghez D, Antosikova A, et al. Concurrent etoposide, steroid, high-dose ara-c and platinum chemotherapy with radiation therapy in localised extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Eur J Cancer (2015) 51(16):2386–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.009
59. Moon JH, Lee BH, Kim JA, Lee YJ, Chae YS, Yhim HY, et al. Clinical impact of induction treatment modalities and optimal timing of radiotherapy for the treatment of limited-stage NK/T cell lymphoma. Leuk Res (2016) 49:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.08.015
60. Dong LH, Zhang LJ, Wang WJ, Lei W, Sun X, Du JW, et al. Sequential DICE combined with l-asparaginase chemotherapy followed by involved field radiation in newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE, nasal and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma (2016) 57(7):1600–6. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1108415
61. Yoon DH, Kim SJ, Jeong SH, Shin DY, Bae SH, Hong J, et al. Phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with l-asparaginase and MIDLE chemotherapy for newly diagnosed stage I/II extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (CISL-1008). Oncotarget (2016) 7(51):85584–91. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11319
62. Jiang M, Zhang L, Xie L, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Liu WP, et al. A phase II prospective study of the "Sandwich" protocol, l-asparaginase, cisplatin, dexamethasone and etoposide chemotherapy combined with concurrent radiation and cisplatin, in newly diagnosed, I/II stage, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget (2017) 8(30):50155–63. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16334
63. Xu PP, Xiong J, Cheng S, Zhao X, Wang CF, Cai G, et al. A phase II study of methotrexate, etoposide, dexamethasone and pegaspargase sandwiched with radiotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE extranodal natural-Killer/T-Cell lymphoma, nasal-type. EBioMedicine (2017) 25:41–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.10.011
64. Qi F, Wang WH, He XH, Chen B, Gui L, Fang H, et al. Phase 2 study of first-line intensity modulated radiation therapy followed by gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin for high-risk, early stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: The GREEN study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2018) 102(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.046
65. Zheng W, Gao Y, Ke X, Zhang W, Su L, Ren H, et al. PEG-L-CHOP treatment is safe and effective in adult extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma with a low rate of clinical hypersensitivity. BMC Cancer (2018) 18(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4782-y
66. Liu Y, Xue K, Xia Z, Jin J, Wang J, Sun H, et al. Radiotherapy followed by DICEP regimen in treatment of newly diagnosed, stage IE/IIE, extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma patients. Cancer Med (2020) 9(15):5400–5. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3207
67. Wang H, Wang L, Li C, Wuxiao Z, Chen G, Luo W, et al. Pegaspargase combined with concurrent radiotherapy for early-stage extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: A two-center phase II study. Oncologist (2020) 25(11):e1725–e31. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0144
68. Wei C, Cao X, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Wang W, Zhang L, et al. Combined gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and pegaspargase (GDP-ML) for patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type: a single arm, single center, prospective phase 2 study. Ann Hematol (2020) 99(12):2801–9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04036-z
69. Wei L, Yang L, Ye J, Cong J, Li X, Yao N, et al. Outcomes of patients treated with SVILE vs. p-GemOx for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Cancer Biol Med (2020) 17(3):795–804. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0160
70. Zhu F, Liu T, Pan H, Xiao Y, Li Q, Liu X, et al. Long-term outcomes of upfront concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by p-GDP regimen in newly diagnosed early stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma: A prospective single-center phase II study. Med (Baltimore) (2020) 99(33):e21705. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021705
71. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Xia Z, Jin J, Xue K, Wang J, et al. Phase II study of sequential chemoradiotherapy with l-asparaginase, dexamethasone, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide (DICE-l) in the early stage of extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma. Ann Transl Med (2021) 9(14):1178. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3525
72. Hu S, Lin N, Liu J, Sun Y, Liu W, Wang X, et al. A prospective phase II study of pegaspargase-COEP plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed extra-nodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Front Oncol (2022) 12:839252. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.839252
73. Wang Y, Wang CQ, Sun P, Liu PP, Yang H, Wang HY, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, peg-asparaginase, dexamethasone and methotrexate regimen for newly diagnosed extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: Final analysis with long-term follow-up and rational research for the combination. Front Oncol (2022) 12:796738. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.796738
74. Zhu Y, Tian S, Xu L, Ma Y, Zhang W, Wang L, et al. GELAD chemotherapy with sandwiched radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage IE/IIE natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Haematol (2022) 196(4):939–46. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17960
75. Chai Y, Chen B, Qi F, Fang H, Qi SN, Guo RY, et al. First-line chemoradiation with or without chidamide (tucidinostat) in patients with early stage intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a randomized phase 2 study in China. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2022) 113(4):833–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.001
76. Zhang Y, Ma S, Cai J, Yang Y, Jing H, Shuang Y, et al. Sequential p-GEMOX and radiotherapy for early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study. Am J Hematol (2021) 96(11):1481–90. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26335
77. Zhang L, Wang Y, Li X, Li L, Wang X, Sun Z, et al. Radiotherapy vs sequential pegaspargase, gemcitabine, cisplatin and dexamethasone and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed early natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study. Int J Cancer (2021) 148(6):1470–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33329
78. Hu Y, Chen M, Song Y, Liu X, Gou F, Zhang J, et al. Study of l-asparaginase, vincristine, and dexamethasone combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Oncol (2020) 43(4):257–62. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000647
79. Tian S, Li R, Wang T, Wang S, Tao R, Hu X, et al. Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy with sandwiched radiotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed stage IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Cancer Med (2019) 8(7):3349–58. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2214
80. Qi F, Chen B, Wang J, Lin X, Qi S, Yang J, et al. Upfront radiation is essential for high-risk early-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: comparison of two sequential treatment modalities combining radiotherapy and GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) in the modern era. Leuk Lymphoma (2019) 60(11):2679–88. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1599111
81. Su C, Nguyen KA, Bai HX, Balaji D, Cao Y, Karakousis G, et al. Comparison of chemoradiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in elderly patients. Leuk Lymphoma (2018) 59(6):1406–12. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1379078
82. Liu T, Zhu F, Xiao Y, Li Q, Liu X, Yang K, et al. Pegaspargase, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (P-GDP) combined chemotherapy is effective for newly diagnosed extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Cancer Manag Res (2018) 10:5061–9. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S179567
83. Bennani NN, Tun AM, Carson KR, Geiger JL, Maeda LS, Savage KJ, et al. Characteristics and outcome of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma in north America: A retrospective multi-institutional experience. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk (2021) 22(5):e300–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.018
84. Li JW, Li YJ, Zhong MZ, Liu XL, Li J, Li KL, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of GELOXD/P-GEMOXD in newly diagnosed nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Haematol (2018) 100(3):247–56. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13004
85. Li J, Li Y, Zhong M, Liu W, Liu X, Li J, et al. A multicenter retrospective comparison of sequential versus sandwich chemoradiotherapy for stage IE-IIE extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. J Cancer (2018) 9(9):1598–606. doi: 10.7150/jca.24310
86. Yamaguchi M, Suzuki R, Oguchi M, Asano N, Amaki J, Akiba T, et al. Treatments and outcomes of patients with extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2013: A cooperative study in Japan. J Clin Oncol (2017) 35(1):32–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1619
87. Wei W, Wu P, Li L, Zhang ZH. Effectiveness of pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (P-GEMOX) chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE Nasal-type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Hematology (2017) 22(6):320–9. doi: 10.1080/10245332.2016.1264163
88. Vargo JA, Patel A, Glaser SM, Balasubramani GK, Farah RJ, Marks SM, et al. The impact of the omission or inadequate dosing of radiotherapy in extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, in the united states. Cancer (2017) 123(16):3176–85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30697
89. Qian M, Tao H, Xu W, Ji H. A systematic comparison of treatment modalities for nasal extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma in early stages between concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemotherapy. Onco Targets Ther (2017) 10:3617–23. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S136386
90. Huang Y, Yang J, Liu P, Zhou S, Gui L, He X, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy followed by GDP chemotherapy for newly diagnosed stage I/II extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type. Ann Hematol (2017) 96(9):1477–83. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3046-2
91. Cao J, Lan S, Shen L, Si H, Zhang N, Li H, et al. A comparison of treatment modalities for nasal extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma in early stages: The efficacy of CHOP regimen based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Oncotarget (2017) 8(12):20362–70. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13614
92. Kim TH, Kim JS, Suh YG, Cho J, Yang WI, Suh CO. The roles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the era of multimodal treatment for early-stage nasal-type extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma. Yonsei Med J (2016) 57(4):846–54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.846
93. Ma X, Guo Y, Pang Z, Wang B, Lu H, Gu YJ, et al. A randomized phase II study of CEOP with or without semustine as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IE/IIE extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in the upper aerodigestive tract. Radiother Oncol (2009) 93(3):492–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.045
94. Wei L, Wang J, Ye J, Yang L, Cong J, Li X, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients treated with an EPOCHL regimen as first-line chemotherapy for newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective single-center study. Leuk Lymphoma (2020) 61(2):337–43. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1663421
95. Yamaguchi M, Tobinai K, Oguchi M, Ishizuka N, Kobayashi Y, Isobe Y, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for localized nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: An updated analysis of the Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0211. J Clin Oncol (2012) 30(32):4044–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6541
96. Yamaguchi M, Tobinai K, Oguchi M, Ishizuka N, Kobayashi Y, Isobe Y, et al. Phase I/II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for localized nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0211. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27(33):5594–600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8295
97. Zhang L, Jiang M, Xie L, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Yang QP, et al. Five-year analysis from phase 2 trial of "sandwich" chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med (2016) 5(1):33–40. doi: 10.1002/cam4.569
98. Huang H, Tao R, Yang Y, Cen H, Zhou H, Guo Y, et al. GEMSTONE-201: Preplanned primary analysis of a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study of sugemalimab (suge) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (R/R ENKTL). J Clin Oncol (2022) 40(16_suppl):7501. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7501
99. Kim BS, Kim DW, Im SA, Kim CW, Kim TY, Yoon SS, et al. Effective second-line chemotherapy for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and prednisolone. Ann Oncol (2009) 20(1):121–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn551
100. Jaccard A, Gachard N, Marin B, Rogez S, Audrain M, Suarez F, et al. Efficacy of l-asparaginase with methotrexate and dexamethasone (AspaMetDex regimen) in patients with refractory or relapsing extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, a phase 2 study. Blood (2011) 117(6):1834–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307454
101. Yamaguchi M, Kwong YL, Kim WS, Maeda Y, Hashimoto C, Suh C, et al. Phase II study of SMILE chemotherapy for newly diagnosed stage IV, relapsed, or refractory extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: the NK-cell tumor study group study. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29(33):4410–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6287
102. Ji J, Liu T, Xiang B, Liu W, He C, Chen X, et al. A study of gemcitabine, l-asparaginase, ifosfamide, dexamethasone and etoposide chemotherapy for newly diagnosed stage IV, relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Leuk Lymphoma (2014) 55(12):2955–7. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.907894
103. Wang YQ, Yang Y, Zhuo HY, Zou LQ, Jiang Y, Jiang M. Trial of LVDP regimen (L-asparaginase, etoposide, dexamethasone, and cisplatin, followed by radiotherapy) as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed, stage III/IV extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma. Med Oncol (2015) 32(2):435. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0435-4
104. Kim M, Kim TM, Kim KH, Keam B, Lee SH, Kim DW, et al. Ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone (IMEP) plus l-asparaginase as a first-line therapy improves outcomes in stage III/IV NK/T cell-lymphoma, nasal type (NTCL). Ann Hematol (2015) 94(3):437–44. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2228-4
105. Ding H, Chang J, Liu LG, Hu D, Zhang WH, Yan Y, et al. High-dose methotrexate, etoposide, dexamethasone and pegaspargase (MEDA) combination chemotherapy is effective for advanced and relapsed/refractory extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Int J Hematol (2015) 102(2):181–7. doi: 10.1007/s12185-015-1809-x
106. Zhou Z, Li X, Chen C, Li X, Zhang L, Li L, et al. Effectiveness of gemcitabine, pegaspargase, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (DDGP) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma: a retrospective study of 17 patients. Ann Hematol (2014) 93(11):1889–94. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2136-7
107. Wang JH, Wang L, Liu CC, Xia ZJ, Huang HQ, Lin TY, et al. Efficacy of combined gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and pegaspargase (P-gemox regimen) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage or relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget (2016) 7(20):29092–101. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8647
108. Liang JH, Wang L, Peter Gale R, Wu W, Xia Y, Fan L, et al. Efficacy of pegaspargase, etoposide, methotrexate and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed advanced-stage extra-nodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma with the analysis of the prognosis of whole blood EBV-DNA. Blood Cancer J (2017) 7(9):e608. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.88
109. Cai J, Liu P, Huang H, Li Y, Ma S, Zhou H, et al. Combination of anti-PD-1 antibody with p-GEMOX as a potentially effective immunochemotherapy for advanced natural killer/T cell lymphoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5(1):289. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00331-3
110. Liu W, Yang Y, Qi S, Wang Y, He X, Zhang L, et al. Treatment, survival, and prognosis of advanced-stage natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma: An analysis from the China lymphoma collaborative group. Front Oncol (2020) 10:583050. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583050
111. Tao R, Fan L, Song Y, Hu Y, Zhang W, Wang Y, et al. Sintilimab for relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (ORIENT-4). Signal Transduct Target Ther (2021) 6(1):365. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00768-0
112. Li J, Li J, Zhong M, Zhou H, Yu B. The clinical features and survival outcome of 107 newly diagnosed advanced stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma cases: A triple-center study. Cancer Manag Res (2021) 13:1541–9. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S292293
113. Wang X, Hu J, Dong M, Ding M, Zhu L, Wu J, et al. DDGP vs. SMILE in Relapsed/Refractory extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: A retrospective study of 54 patients. Clin Transl Sci (2021) 14(1):405–11. doi: 10.1111/cts.12893
114. Song GY, Yoon DH, Suh C, Moon JH, Baek DW, Kim JS, et al. Open-label, single arm, multicenter phase II study of VIDL induction chemotherapy followed by upfront autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant (2021) 56(5):1205–8. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01160-2
115. Yamaguchi M, Kita K, Miwa H, Nishii K, Oka K, Ohno T, et al. Frequent expression of p-glycoprotein/MDR1 by nasal T-cell lymphoma cells. Cancer (1995) 76(11):2351–6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2351::AID-CNCR2820761125>3.0.CO;2-1
116. Ahn HK, Kim SJ, Hwang DW, Ko YH, Tang T, Lim ST, et al. Gemcitabine alone and/or containing chemotherapy is efficient in refractory or relapsed NK/T-cell lymphoma. Invest New Drugs (2013) 31(2):469–72. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9889-4
117. Pokrovsky VS, Vinnikov D. L-asparaginase for newly diagnosed extra-nodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther (2017) 17(8):759–68. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1344100
118. Akahane K, Kimura S, Miyake K, Watanabe A, Kagami K, Yoshimura K, et al. Association of allele-specific methylation of the ASNS gene with asparaginase sensitivity and prognosis in T-ALL. Blood Adv (2022) 6(1):212–24. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004271
119. Obama K, Tara M, Niina K. L-asparaginase induced complete remission in Epstein-Barr virus positive, multidrug resistant, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Int J Hematol (1999) 69(4):260–2.
120. Nagafuji K, Fujisaki T, Arima F, Ohshima K. L-asparaginase induced durable remission of relapsed nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol (2001) 74(4):447–50. doi: 10.1007/BF02982090
121. Obama K, Tara M, Niina K. L-asparaginase-Based induction therapy for advanced extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Int J Hematol (2003) 78(3):248–50. doi: 10.1007/BF02983802
122. Yong W, Zheng W, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Wei Y, Zhu D, et al. L-asparaginase-based regimen in the treatment of refractory midline nasal/nasal-type T/NK-cell lymphoma. Int J Hematol (2003) 78(2):163–7. doi: 10.1007/bf02983387
123. Liu WJ, Wang H, Peng XW, Wang WD, Liu NW, Wang Y, et al Asparagine synthetase expression is associated with the sensitivity to asparaginase in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma in vivo and in vitro. Onco Targets Ther (2018) 11:6605–15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S155930
124. Li Y, Zhang X, Hu T, Han L, Li R, Wen J, et al. Asparagine synthetase expression and its potential prognostic value in patients with NK/T cell lymphoma. Oncol Rep (2014) 32(2):853–9. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3237
125. Mundy-Bosse BL, Weigel C, Wu YZ, Abdelbaky S, Youssef Y, Casas SB, et al. Identification and targeting of the developmental blockade in extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma. Blood Cancer Discovery (2022) 3(2):154–69. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-21-0098
126. Asselin B, Rizzari C. Asparaginase pharmacokinetics and implications of therapeutic drug monitoring. Leuk Lymphoma (2015) 56(8):2273–80. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.1003056
127. Asselin BL, Whitin JC, Coppola DJ, Rupp IP, Sallan SE, Cohen HJ. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of three asparaginase preparations. J Clin Oncol (1993) 11(9):1780–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.9.1780
128. Chen SH. Asparaginase therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A focus on the mode of drug resistance. Pediatr Neonatol (2015) 56(5):287–93. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.10.006
129. Kim HJ, Ock CY, Kim TM, Lee SH, Lee JY, Jung SH, et al. Comparison of native escherichia coli l-asparaginase versus pegylated asparaginase, in combination with ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone, in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Cancer Res Treat (2018) 50(3):670–80. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.051
130. Wang X, Zhang L, Liu X, Li X, Li L, Fu X, et al. Efficacy and safety of a pegasparaginase-based chemotherapy regimen vs an l-asparaginase–based chemotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed advanced extranodal natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Oncol (2022) 8(7):1035–41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1968
131. Van Trimpont M, Peeters E, De Visser Y, Schalk AM, Mondelaers V, De Moerloose B, et al. Novel insights on the use of l-asparaginase as an efficient and safe anti-cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel) (2022) 14(4). doi: 10.3390/cancers14040902
132. Kawedia JD, Liu C, Pei D, Cheng C, Fernandez CA, Howard SC, et al. Dexamethasone exposure and asparaginase antibodies affect relapse risk in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood (2012) 119(7):1658–64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-381731
133. Liu C, Kawedia JD, Cheng C, Pei D, Fernandez CA, Cai X, et al. Clinical utility and implications of asparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia (2012) 26(11):2303–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.102
134. Hak LJ, Relling MV, Cheng C, Pei D, Wang B, Sandlund JT, et al. Asparaginase pharmacodynamics differ by formulation among children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia (2004) 18(6):1072–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403351
135. Armstrong JK, Hempel G, Koling S, Chan LS, Fisher T, Meiselman HJ, et al. Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer (2007) 110(1):103–11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22739
136. Douer D, Yampolsky H, Cohen LJ, Watkins K, Levine AM, Periclou AP, et al. Pharmacodynamics and safety of intravenous pegaspargase during remission induction in adults aged 55 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood (2007) 109(7):2744–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035006
137. Bleyer A, Asselin BL, Koontz SE, Hunger SP. Clinical application of asparaginase activity levels following treatment with pegaspargase. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2015) 62(6):1102–5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25299
138. Kloos RQH, Pieters R, Jumelet FMV, Jumelet FMV, van den Bos C. Individualized asparaginase dosing in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Ocol (2020) 38(7):715–24. doi: 10.1200/jco.19.02292
139. Rizzari C, Citterio M, Zucchetti M, Conter V, Chiesa R, Colombini A, et al. A pharmacological study on pegylated asparaginase used in front-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica (2006) 91(1):24–31.
140. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol (2014) 32(27):3059–68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800
141. Kim TM, Heo DS. Extranodal NK / T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: new staging system and treatment strategies. Cancer Sci (2009) 100(12):2242–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01319.x
142. Hong H, Li Y, Lim ST, Liang C, Huang H, Yi P, et al. A proposal for a new staging system for extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma: a multicenter study from China and Asia lymphoma study group. Leukemia (2020) 34(8):2243–8. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0740-1
143. Huang H-q, Yan G, Su H, Huang Y, Gao Y, Xiaoxiao W, et al. Clinical outcome of an multicentre, randomized, phase II clinical trial for patients with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma treated by p-gemox or aspametdex. Blood (2019) 134(Supplement_1):1569. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-123478
144. Kim TM, Park YH, Lee SY, Kim JH, Kim DW, Im SA, et al. Local tumor invasiveness is more predictive of survival than international prognostic index in stage I(E)/II(E) extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Blood (2005) 106(12):3785–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2056
145. Wu W, Ren K, Li N, Luo Q, Xu C, Zou L. Evaluation of different staging systems and prognostic analysis of nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma based on consistent LVDP chemotherapy regimen. Transl Oncol (2022) 21:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101437
146. Li YY, Feng LL, Niu SQ, Wang HY, Zhang LL, Wang L, et al. Radiotherapy improves survival in early stage extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma patients receiving asparaginase-based chemotherapy. Oncotarget (2017) 8(7):11480–8. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14006
147. Yang Y, Zhu Y, Cao JZ, Zhang YJ, Xu LM, Yuan ZY, et al. Risk-adapted therapy for early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: Analysis from a multicenter study. Blood (2015) 126(12):1424–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-639336
148. Sakata K, Hareyama M, Ohuchi A, Sido M, Nagakura H, Morita K, et al. Treatment of lethal midline granuloma type nasal T-cell lymphoma. Acta Oncol (1997) 36(3):307–11. doi: 10.3109/02841869709001268
149. Deng XW, Wu JX, Wu T, Zhu SY, Shi M, Su H, et al. Radiotherapy is essential after complete response to asparaginase-containing chemotherapy in early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study from the China lymphoma collaborative group (CLCG). Radiother Oncol (2018) 129(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.026
150. Fauci AS, Johnson RE, Wolff SM. Radiation therapy of midline granuloma. Ann Intern Med (1976) 84(2):140–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-2-140
151. Qi SN, Li YX, Specht L, Oguchi M, Tsang R, Ng A, et al. Modern radiation therapy for extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: Risk-adapted therapy, target volume, and dose guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2021) 110(4):1064–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.011
152. Chen HH, Fong L, Su IJ, Ting LL, Hong RL, Leung HW, et al. Experience of radiotherapy in lethal midline granuloma with special emphasis on centrofacial T-cell lymphoma: A retrospective analysis covering a 34-year period. Radiother Oncol (1996) 38(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01668-6
153. Smalley SR, Cupps RE, Anderson JA, Ilstrup DM, McDonald TJ, Weiland LH, et al. Polymorphic reticulosis limited to the upper aerodigestive tract–natural history and radiotherapeutic considerations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1988) 15(3):599–605. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90300-8
154. Liang R, Todd D, Chan TK, Chiu E, Choy D, Loke SL, et al. Nasal lymphoma. A retrospective analysis of 60 cases. Cancer (1990) 66(10):2205–9.
155. Kim BS, Kim TY, Kim CW, Kim JY, Heo DS, Bang YJ, et al. Therapeutic outcome of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma initially treated with chemotherapy–result of chemotherapy in NK/T-cell lymphoma. Acta Oncol (2003) 42(7):779–83. doi: 10.1080/02841860310010682
156. Barrionuevo C, Zaharia M, Martinez MT, Taxa L, Misad O, Moscol A, et al. Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: Study of clinicopathologic and prognosis factors in a series of 78 cases from Peru. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol (2007) 15(1):38–44. doi: 10.1097/01.pai.0000205062.27174.56
157. Zheng X, He X, Yang Y, Liu X, Zhang LL, Qu BL, et al. Association of improved overall survival with decreased distant metastasis following asparaginase-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: A CLCG study. ESMO Open (2021) 6(4):100206. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100206
158. Shi Y, Dong M, Hong X, Zhang W, Feng J, Zhu J, et al. Results from a multicenter, open-label, pivotal phase II study of chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol (2015) 26(8):1766–71. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv237
159. Kim SJ, Lim JQ, Laurensia Y, Cho J, Yoon SE, Lee JY, et al. Avelumab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: An open-label phase 2 study. Blood (2020) 136(24):2754–63. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007247
160. Gao Y, Huang H, Wang X, Bai B, Zhang L, Xiao Y, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody (Sintilimab) plus histone deacetylase inhibitor (Chidamide) for the treatment of refractory or relapsed extranodal natural Killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (r/r-ENKTL): Preliminary results from a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial (SCENT). Blood (2020) 136(Supplement 1):39–40. doi: 10.1182/blood-2020-134665
161. Huang H, Zhu J, Yao M, Kim TM, Yoon DH, Cho SG, et al. Daratumumab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study. J Hematol Oncol (2021) 14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-01020-y
162. Ghione P, Qi S, Imber BS, Seshan V, Moskowitz A, Galasso N, et al. (mSMILE) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for extranodal NK-T lymphoma nasal type in a single-center population. Leuk Lymphoma (2020) 61(14):3331–41. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1811864
163. Cui Y, Yao Y, Chen M, Jiang Y, Ren Q. The optimal timing of radiotherapy in the combination treatment of limited-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: An updated meta-analysis. Ann Hematol (2021) 100(12):2889–900. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04700-y
164. Qi SN, Yang Y, Zhang YJ, Huang HQ, Wang Y, He X, et al. Risk-based, response-adapted therapy for early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma in the modern chemotherapy era: A China lymphoma collaborative group study. Am J Hematol (2020) 95(9):1047–56. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25878
165. Kwong YL, Kim SJ, Tse E, Oh SY, Kwak JY, Eom HS, et al. Sequential chemotherapy/radiotherapy was comparable with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage I/II NK/T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol (2018) 29(1):256–63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx684
166. Pokrovsky VS, Vinnikov D. Defining the toxicity of current regimens for extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma: a systematic review and metaproportion. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther (2019) 19(1):93–104. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1549992
167. Kim SJ, Park S, Kang ES, Choi JY, Lim DH, Ko YH, et al. Induction treatment with SMILE and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed stage IV extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma patients. Ann Hematol (2015) 94(1):71–8. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2171-4
168. Lim SH, Hong JY, Lim ST, Hong H, Arnoud J, Zhao W, et al. Beyond first-line non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Clinical outcome and current perspectives on salvage therapy for patients after first relapse and progression of disease. Ann Oncol (2017) 28(9):2199–205. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx316
169. Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee J, Oh SO, Chang DK, Rhee PL, et al. Primary NK-/T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: clinical characteristics and endoscopic findings. Endoscopy (2007) 39(2):156–60. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945114
170. Zheng S, Ouyang Q, Li G, Xu H, Jiang M, Cui D, et al. Primary intestinal NK/T cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 25 Chinese cases. Arch Iran Med (2012) 15(1):36–42. doi: 012151/AIM.0011
171. Jiang M, Chen X, Yi Z, Zhang X, Zhang B, Luo F, et al. Prognostic characteristics of gastrointestinal tract NK/T-cell lymphoma: an analysis of 47 patients in China. J Clin Gastroenterol (2013) 47(8):e74–9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829e444f
172. Au WY, Weisenburger DD, Intragumtornchai T, Nakamura S, Kim WS, Sng I, et al. Clinical differences between nasal and extranasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A study of 136 cases from the international peripheral T-cell lymphoma project. Blood (2009) 113(17):3931–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-185256
173. Huang Y, Shi X, Zhong P, Wang Y, Xiao H, Zhou X, et al. De novo testicular extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A clinicopathologic study of 21 cases with review of additional 18 cases in the literature. Am J Surg Pathol (2019) 43(4):549–58. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001210
174. Lee WJ, Jung JM, Won CH, Chang SE, Choi JH, Chan Moon K, et al. Cutaneous extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a comparative clinicohistopathologic and survival outcome analysis of 45 cases according to the primary tumor site. J Am Acad Dermatol (2014) 70(6):1002–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.023
175. Jiang L, Li P, Quan Q, Chen P, Qiu H, Zhang B. Cutaneous extranodal natural killer (NK) / T - cell lymphoma: A comprehensive clinical features and outcomes analysis of 71 cases. Leuk Res (2020) 88:106284. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106284
176. Kwong YL. High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic SCT in the management of natural killer-cell malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant (2009) 44(11):709–14. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.239
177. Tse E, Zhao WL, Xiong J, Kwong YL. How we treat NK/T-cell lymphomas. J Hematol Oncol (2022) 15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01293-5
178. Murashige N, Kami M, Kishi Y, Kim SW, Takeuchi M, Matsue K, et al. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a promising treatment for natural killer-cell neoplasms. Br J Haematol (2005) 130(4):561–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05651.x
179. Ennishi D, Maeda Y, Fujii N, Kondo E, Shinagawa K, Ikeda K, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Leuk Lymphoma (2011) 52(7):1255–61. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.572322
180. Tse E, Chan TS, Koh LP, Chng WJ, Kim WS, Tang T, et al. Allogeneic haematopoietic SCT for natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a multicentre analysis from the Asia lymphoma study group. Bone Marrow Transplant (2014) 49(7):902–6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.65
181. Brammer JE, Chihara D, Poon LM, Caimi P, de Lima M, Ledesma C, et al. Management of advanced and Relapsed/Refractory extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma: An analysis of stem cell transplantation and chemotherapy outcomes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk (2018) 18(1):e41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.10.001
182. Bi XW, Wang H, Zhang WW, Wang JH, Liu WJ, Xia ZJ, et al. PD-L1 is upregulated by EBV-driven LMP1 through NF-kappaB pathway and correlates with poor prognosis in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. J Hematol Oncol (2016) 9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0341-7
183. Chen BJ, Chapuy B, Ouyang J, Sun HH, Roemer MG, Xu ML, et al. PD-L1 expression is characteristic of a subset of aggressive b-cell lymphomas and virus-associated malignancies. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19(13):3462–73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0855
184. Wang J, Gao YS, Xu K, Li XD. Combination of atezolizumab and chidamide to maintain long-term remission in refractory metastatic extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A case report. World J Clin cases (2022) 10(5):1609–16. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1609
185. Yan Z, Yao S, Liu Y, Zhang J, Li P, Wang H, et al. Durable response to sintilimab and chidamide in a patient with pegaspargase- and immunotherapy-resistant NK/T-cell lymphoma: Case report and literature review. Front Oncol (2020) 10:608304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.608304
186. Wang C, Liu Y, Dong L, Li X, Yang Q, Brock MV, et al. Efficacy of decitabine plus anti-PD-1 camrelizumab in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who progressed or relapsed after PD-1 blockade monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res (2021) 27(10):2782–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0133
187. Kim WS, Oki Y, Kim SJ, Yoon SE, Ardeshna KM, Lin Y, et al. Autologous EBV-specific T cell treatment results in sustained responses in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T lymphoma: results of a multicenter study. Ann Hematol (2021) 100(10):2529–39. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04558-0
188. Bollard CM, Gottschalk S, Torrano V, Diouf O, Ku S, Hazrat Y, et al. Sustained complete responses in patients with lymphoma receiving autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes targeting Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane proteins. J Clin Oncol (2014) 32(8):798–808. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.5304
189. Cho SG, Kim N, Sohn HJ, Lee SK, Oh ST, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term outcome of extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma patients treated with postremission therapy using EBV LMP1 and LMP2a-specific CTLs. Mol Ther (2015) 23(8):1401–9. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.91
190. Ando M, Ando J, Yamazaki S, Ishii M, Sakiyama Y, Harada S, et al. Long-term eradication of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, by induced pluripotent stem cell-derived Epstein-Barr virus-specific rejuvenated T cells in vivo. Haematologica (2020) 105(3):796–807. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.223511
191. Poon LM, Kwong YL. Complete remission of refractory disseminated NK/T cell lymphoma with brentuximab vedotin and bendamustine. Ann Hematol (2016) 95(5):847–9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2627-9
192. Kim HK, Moon SM, Moon JH, Park JE, Byeon S, Kim WS. Complete remission in CD30-positive refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma with brentuximab vedotin. Blood Res (2015) 50(4):254–6. doi: 10.5045/br.2015.50.4.254
193. Kim SJ, Yoon DH, Kim JS, Kang HJ, Lee HW, Eom HS, et al. Efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in relapsed or refractory high-CD30-Expressing non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Results of a multicenter, open-labeled phase II trial. Cancer Res Treat (2020) 52(2):374–87. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.198
194. Zheng M, Yu L, Hu J, Zhang Z, Wang H, Lu D, et al. Efficacy of B7-H3-Redirected BiTE and CAR-T immunotherapies against extranodal nasal natural Killer/T cell lymphoma. Transl Oncol (2020) 13(5):100770. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100770
195. Lu P, Liu Y, Yang J, Zhang X, Yang X, Wang H, et al. Naturally selected CD7 CAR-T therapy without genetic manipulations for T-ALL/LBL: first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. Blood (2022) 140(4):321–34. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014498
196. Kagami Y, Nakamura S, Suzuki R, Iida S, Yatabe Y, Okada Y, et al. Establishment of an IL-2-dependent cell line derived from 'nasal-type' NK/T-cell lymphoma of CD2+, sCD3-, CD3epsilon+, CD56+ phenotype and associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. Br J Haematol (1998) 103(3):669–77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.01029.x
197. Wang L, Li LR, Zhang L, Wang JW. The landscape of new drugs in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Treat Rev (2020) 89:102065. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102065
198. Wang L, Bi XW, Zhu YJ, He YZ, Lai QY, Xia ZJ, et al. IL-2Ralpha up-regulation is mediated by latent membrane protein 1 and promotes lymphomagenesis and chemotherapy resistance in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Commun (Lond) (2018) 38(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0334-8
199. Liu W, Zhao D, Liu T, Niu T, Song Y, Xu W, et al. A multi-center, real-world study of chidamide for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas in China. Front Oncol (2021) 11:750323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.750323
200. Shi Y, Jia B, Xu W, Li W, Liu T, Liu P, et al. Chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma: A multicenter real-world study in China. J Hematol Oncol (2017) 10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0439-6
201. Picod A, Martino S, Cervera P, Manuceau G, Arca M, Wittner M, et al. Deregulated JAK3 mediates growth advantage and hemophagocytosis in extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Haematologica (2022) 107(9):2218–25. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280349
202. Venkatakrishnan K, Kim TM, Lin CC, Thye LS, Chng WJ, Ma B, et al. Phase 1 study of the investigational aurora a kinase inhibitor alisertib (MLN8237) in East Asian cancer patients: pharmacokinetics and recommended phase 2 dose. Invest New Drugs (2015) 33(4):942–53. doi: 10.1007/s10637-015-0258-y
203. Barr PM, Li H, Spier C, Mahadevan D, LeBlanc M, Ul Haq M, et al. Phase II intergroup trial of alisertib in relapsed and refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma and transformed mycosis fungoides: SWOG 1108. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33(21):2399–404. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.6327
204. Landes JR, Moore SA, Bartley BR, Doan HQ, Rady PL, Tyring SK. The efficacy of selinexor (KPT-330), an XPO1 inhibitor, on non-hematologic cancers: A comprehensive review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2022). doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04247-z
205. Azmi AS, Uddin MH, Mohammad RM. The nuclear export protein XPO1 - from biology to targeted therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2021) 18(3):152–69. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00442-4
206. Huang H, Gao Y, Zhang H, Zhou K, Wu J, Cai Z, et al. XPO1 inhibitor (ATG-010) plus chemotherapy per investigator's choice for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL):Preliminary results from a multicenter, single-arm, phase ib study (TOUCH trial). Blood (2021) 138(Supplement 1):2452. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-147100
207. Jin J, Cen H, Zhou K, Xu X, Li F, Wu T, et al. A phase ib study of a PI3Kδ inhibitor linperlisib in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Hematological Oncology (2021) 39(S2 supplement abstract):300–1. doi: 10.1002/hon.128_2880
208. Horwitz SM, Koch R, Porcu P, Oki Y, Moskowitz A, Perez M, et al. Activity of the PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor duvelisib in a phase 1 trial and preclinical models of T-cell lymphoma. Blood (2018) 131(8):888–98. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-08-802470
209. Huen A, Haverkos BM, Zain J, Radhakrishnan R, Lechowicz MJ, Devata S, et al. Phase I/Ib study of tenalisib (RP6530), a dual PI3K delta/gamma inhibitor in patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-cell lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(8). doi: 10.3390/cancers12082293
210. de Mel S, Hue SS, Jeyasekharan AD, Chng WJ, Ng SB. Molecular pathogenic pathways in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. J Hematol Oncol (2019) 12(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0716-7
211. Zhu H, Gao H, Ji Y, Zhou Q, Du Z, Tian L, et al. Targeting p53-MDM2 interaction by small-molecule inhibitors: Learning from MDM2 inhibitors in clinical trials. J Hematol Oncol (2022) 15(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01314-3
212. Jiang L, Gu ZH, Yan ZX, Zhao X, Xie YY, Zhang ZG, et al. Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DDX3X in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Nat Genet (2015) 47(9):1061–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.3358
213. Xiong J, Cui BW, Wang N, Dai YT, Zhang H, Wang CF, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic characterization of natural killer T cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell (2020) 37(3):403–19 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.02.005
214. Dong G, Liu X, Wang L, Yin W, Bouska A, Gong Q, et al. Genomic profiling identifies distinct genetic subtypes in extra-nodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia (2022) 36(8):2064–75. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01623-z
215. Lim JQ, Huang D, Chan JY, Laurensia Y, Wong EKY, Cheah DMZ, et al. A genomic-augmented multivariate prognostic model for the survival of natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma patients from an international cohort. Am J Hematol (2022) 97(9):1159–69. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26636
216. Lim JQ, Huang D, Tang T, Tan D, Laurensia Y, Peng RJ, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies responders to pembrolizumab in relapse/refractory natural-killer/T cell lymphoma. Leukemia (2020) 34(12):3413–9. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-1000-0
Keywords: extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, asparaginase, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, immunotherapy, treatment, novel drug, review
Citation: Yan Z, Yao S, Wang Z, Zhou W, Yao Z and Liu Y (2023) Treatment of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: From past to future. Front. Immunol. 14:1088685. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1088685
Received: 03 November 2022; Accepted: 27 January 2023;
Published: 07 February 2023.
Edited by:
Mohammad Azhar Aziz, Aligarh Muslim University, IndiaReviewed by:
Minoru Kanaya, Aiiku Hospital, JapanJiajia Zhou, University of Michigan, United States
Abdulaziz Alfahed, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Copyright © 2023 Yan, Yao, Wang, Zhou, Yao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yanyan Liu, yyliu@zzu.edu.cn; Zhihua Yao, zlyyyaozhihua1260@zzu.edu.cn