Wenwen Guo1†
Tianyun Qiao
Tian Li- 1Clinical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
- 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
- 3School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
Hypoxia is a critical feature of solid tumors and is considered to be a key factor in promoting tumorigenesis and progression. Beyond inducing metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells to adapt to the hypoxia tumor microenvironment (TME), hypoxia can also promote tumor growth by affecting the secretion of exosomes. Exosomes are nano-sized (30-150 nm in diameter) extracellular vesicles that can carry numerous substances including lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites. Notably, hypoxia-induced exosomes alterations not only exist in tumor cells, but also in various TME cells including stromal cells and immune cells. Besides promoting tumor invasion, angiogenesis, and drug resistance, the secretion of these altered exosomes has recently been found to negatively regulate anti-tumor immune responses. In this review, we focus on the hypoxia-induced changes in exosome secretion and found it can contributes to immune evasion and cancer progression by recruiting protumor immune cells into TME, as well as inhibiting antitumor immune cells. Next, we also describe the recent advances of exosomes in immunotherapy and future direction. In conclusion, ongoing discoveries in this field have brought new insights into hypoxia exosome-led immunosuppression, enabling the development of exosome-based therapeutics and elucidating their potential in immunotherapy.
Introduction
The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex and highly heterogeneous environment, which is composed of blood vessels, immune cells, fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, signaling molecules (i.e., chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, etc.), and metabolic wastes (e.g., lactic acid) (1). Hypoxia (low oxygen concentration) is a major feature of the TME in most solid tumors and has been reported to be associated with tumor progression, therapy resistance, and poor clinical prognosis (2). Hypoxia is caused by the increased oxygen demand of rapid tumor tissue proliferation and insufficient oxygen supply due to tumor vascular defects. In general, tumors can improve oxygen supply by activating hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) to promote tumor neo-angiogenesis (3). Notably, hypoxia not only regulates tumor angiogenesis and metabolic reprogramming but also mediates tumor immune escape, invasion, and metastasis, as well as therapeutic drug resistance (4). Therefore, in the past decades, hypoxia TMEs have received extensive research attention and are regarded as an important target for tumor therapy. Drugs that improve tumor hypoxia, such as bevacizumab and topotecan, have been widely used in the clinical treatment of various tumors and significantly improve the prognosis of patients (5). Noteworthy, a growing number of new findings indicate that hypoxia can also affect tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis, as well as anti-tumor immunity by regulating the secretion of exosomes in the TME (6). Therefore, targeting hypoxia-induced exosomes may be the next key breakthrough in ameliorating the adverse effects of tumor hypoxia, as well as promoting the effect of tumor immunotherapy.
Exosomes are nanoscale bilayer vesicles released by various cell types (tumor cells, stromal cells, immune cells, etc.) upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane (7). They carry various genetic information from parental cells and are deeply involved in the exchange of information between cells (8, 9). Therefore, the size and cargo of an exosome are directly determined by its cell of origin (10, 11). In addition, the size and cargo variables are also greatly affected by TME, such as hypoxia and acidic microenvironment (12). However, the exact mechanism of the association between exosomes and hypoxia during tumor progression needs further elucidation. Studies have shown that typical exosomes have a diameter of 30-150 nm and are usually cup-shaped (13). They all contain multiple types of proteins (such as Rab GTPases, annexin, heat shock proteins HSP60 and HSP905-7) and lipids (e.g., ceramides, cholesterol, and glycerophospholipids), nucleic acids (i.e., mRNAs, microRNAs, circRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs), and metabolites (14, 15). They are present in almost all body fluids, including blood, sweat, tears, urine, ascites, to cerebrospinal fluid. Exosomes were originally thought to be the “dumpster” of cells (16). This view remained unchanged until 1996 when Raposo et al. found that exosomes can affect the function of immune cells (17). However, subsequent studies on exosome functions have revealed their critical roles in intercellular communication, antigen presentation, cell differentiation, anti-tumor immune response, tumor cell migration, and invasion (15). Therefore, the exact mechanism of the association between exosomes and hypoxia during tumor progression needs further elucidation.
Regulation of Hypoxia on Exosomes
As mentioned above, the hypoxia TME can regulate processes such as exosome formation, loading, and release of cargo, which in turn affects intercellular communication at local and distant sites. Multiple studies have shown that tumor cells regulate the secretion of exosomes, as well as the size and distribution of exosomes through HIF-1 under hypoxia conditions (18). For instance, Li et al. found a marked increase in the number of miRNAs in exosomes secreted by oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells under hypoxia conditions. Further mechanistic studies found that the up-regulation of miRNAs in exosomes, especially miRNA-21, was mediated by HIF-1α and HIF-2α, while closely related to tumor stage and lymph node metastasis in patients with OSCC (19). Similarly, Wang et al. exposed three human breast cancer cell lines to a hypoxia environment (1% O2, 24 h) and examined the changes in exosome secretion. Results showed that the number of exosomes was significantly increased under the regulation of the HIF-1α-dependent small GTPase Rab22A (20). In addition, Huang et al. found that HIF-1α can regulate the expression of miRNA-210 in a variety of tumors through hypoxia response elements (21). Noteworthy, other studies have also reported that miRNA-210 is also up-regulated in multiple tumors and is therefore considered to be the most extensive miRNA in hypoxia-induced exosomes (22, 23). In ovarian cancer, HIF induces the release of exosomes with elevated levels of multiple miRNAs, such as miR-21-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-181d-5p. Further in vivo studies found that these hypoxia-induced exosomes can promote tumor proliferation and migration by inducing M2 polarization of macrophages (24). Notably, hypoxia-induced increased exosome secretion is not a phenomenon unique to tumor cells, as Zhang et al. observed HIF-1-mediated increased exosome production and secretion in renal proximal tubule cells under hypoxia (25). Recent studies have also shown that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can also promote the secretion of miRNA-126 in exosomes through HIF-1α in hypoxia (26).
Increasing evidences have shown that increased/altered exosomal protein content also responsible for tumorigenesis, invasion, and drug resistance. Notably, several studies further reported that exosomes released from hypoxia TME are more likely to cause tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Kore et al. qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed the protein content of exosomes secreted by hypoxia-treated glioblastoma cells. The results showed significantly elevated proteins levels such as thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and protein-lysine 6-oxidase (LOX), which have been well documented to be associated with tumor progression, angiogenesis, and treatment resistance (27). Moreover, Huang et al. found that exosomes secreted by colorectal cancer (CRC) cell under hypoxia conditions can promote the migration and invasion of normoxic CRC cell. Further quantitative analysis found that HIF1α-dependent Wnt4 was significantly elevated in these hypoxia-induced exosomes. Elevated Wnt4 in exosomes is thought to enhance the metastatic ability of normal CRC cell, which may provide a new target for CRC therapy (28). Besides proteins and nucleic acids, lipids and metabolites are also important components of exosomes, although much less information is available on their composition and effects. For instance, Schlaepfer et al. observed markedly elevated palmitic, stearic, and linoleic acids in exosomes secreted by hypoxia-treated prostate cancer cell (29). All these studies suggest that hypoxia can affect the secretion and release of various exosome contents.
HIF has been identified to induce exosome secretion by increasing the expression and activation of cell surface receptors such as glucose transporter and transferrin receptor. Specifically, Luo et al. revealed that HIF-1 promotes aerobic glycolysis of tumor cells by up-regulating the expression of M2-type pyruvate kinase (PKM2) mRNA in the hypoxia TME (30). Furthermore, Wei et al. found that PKM2 regulates exosome release mainly by phosphorylating Ser95 of synaptosomeassociated protein 23 (SNAP-23), which is a major component of the synaptosome/SNARE complex. These finding suggests that PKM2 is not just a key enzyme in the process of aerobic glycolysis but promotes the release of exosomes under hypoxia conditions. Thus, it is not surprising that shikonin was found to reduce exosomes release by inhibiting glycolysis, whereas activation of glycolysis by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) increased the secretion of exosomes (31).
In addition to HIF, other signaling molecules and pathways, such as Rab-GTPase, NF-κB, oxidative stress, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR, are also involved in biogenesis and releasing of exosomes under hypoxia (32). For instance, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) promotes exosome release by down-regulating Rab7 and up-regulating Rab27a in ovarian cancer cells under hypoxia conditions (33). In addition, RAb5 has also been reported to regulate exosome release by regulating the transport of vesicles from the cell membrane to early endosomes and fusion with homotypic early endosomes (34). Moreover, the increase of reactive oxygen species under hypoxia can induce oxidative stress, which in turn promotes the release of exosomes. For example, Jurkat T cells secrete about 15 times more exosomes under oxidative stress conditions, while Raji cells secreted about 32 times more exosomes (35). Collectively, these findings confirm that the hypoxia TME can stimulate tumor cells to secrete more exosomes and thereby affect exosome cargo loading. However, the specific molecular mechanism by which hypoxia regulates exosome release is worth further exploration (Figure 1).
Figure 1 The effect of hypoxia induced exosomes on immune system. Hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment can induce tumor cells to secrete a large number of exosomes, including miRNAs, mRNAs, signaling proteins, nucleotides, and immunomodulatory factors. These hypoxia-induced exosomes can mediate the immune evasion of tumor cells by affecting the activity of immune killer cells and promoting the proliferation and activation of immunosuppressive cells. For example, miR-21 and miR-29a in hypoxia-induced exosomes can inhibit the cytotoxicity of NK cell by downregulating the activating receptor NKG2D. In addition, the proliferation and activation of cytotoxic T cells were also inhibited by exosomes. In contrast, for MDSCs, Treg cells, and TAM, hypoxia-induced exosomes can promote the expansion and transformation of these cells. For example, various miRNAs have been reported to promote the M2 polarization of TAMs and thus promote the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. NK cell, natural killer cell; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Treg, regulatory T cell; TAM, Tumor-associated macrophages.
Regulation of the Immune System by Hypoxia-Induced Exosomes
It is well known that exosomes are responsible for intercellular communication that can influence the development, maturation, and anti-tumor activity of immune cells by regulating their molecular signaling (36, 37). On the one hand, under normoxia, exosome secretions can directly activate immune effector cells in vivo and induce stronger immune responses. For example, HSP70 on the surface of exosomes can stimulate the activation of natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, as well as induce stronger T cell responses (38). The exosomes released by mature dendritic cells (DCs) contain elevated levels of MHC I, MHC II, and co-stimulatory molecules, which showed a stronger effect on antigen presentation and immune stimulation (39). In addition, DC-derived exosomes can also express IL-15Rα and natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) ligands, which can promote the proliferation and activation of CD8+ T and NK cells respectively (40, 41). In view of the DC-derived exosomal immunogenicity and immune activation, numerous exosome-based anti-tumor vaccines have entered phase I and phase II clinical trials. On the other hand, tumor-derived exosomes, especially hypoxia-induced exosomes, are rich in a variety of immunomodulatory proteins and chemokines, including CSF-1, CCL2, FTH, FTL, IL-10, and TGF. These hypoxia-induced exosomes promoted the generation and infiltration of immunosuppressive T regulatory (Treg) cells, promoted the polarization of M2-macrophages, and inhibited the proliferation of T cells, collectively promote the immune evasion of tumors (42). In addition, studies have shown that programmed death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) contained in tumor cell-derived exosomes can bind to programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) receptors on T cells to inhibit T cell activation, thereby promoting immune escape of tumors (43).
In general, recent studies on hypoxia-induced exosomes have found that inhibition of immune cells in the TME may be the main reason for the failure of anti-tumor immunity. Therefore, clarifying the regulatory role of exosomes on various immune cells in the hypoxia TME is particularly important for the development of more effective and precise immunotherapy methods (Table 1).
Table 1 Hypoxia-induced exosomes involved in anti-tumor immunity.
Macrophage
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) can differentiate into either M1-type macrophages with pro-inflammatory effects or M2-type macrophages with anti-inflammatory effects, both of which are regulated by the TME (50). Furthermore, studies have shown that this polarization of macrophages can be affected by exosomes within the hypoxia TME. Specifically, exosomes derived from different parental cells will promote the polarization of macrophages into different subtypes. For example, the exosomes secreted by renal tubular epithelial cells under hypoxia can promote the polarization of M1 macrophages and induce high levels of inflammatory responses (51). On the other hand, hypoxia can alter miRNAs levels in tumor cell-derived exosomes and leading to M2 polarization of macrophages (44). Similarly, Chen et al. found that hypoxia can stimulate M2 phenotype polarization by upregulating miR-940 expression in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)-derived exosomes, while the M2 subtype macrophages can in turn promote the proliferation and migration of EOC cells. In addition, hypoxia can also upregulate the expression of miR-21-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-181d-5p in exosomes via HIF to induce the M2-polarization of macrophages (24). In another study, Qian et al. found that compared with normoxic glioma cell exosomes, hypoxia glioma cell exosomes had a stronger ability to induce macrophage polarization to the M2 type. Meanwhile, the study also indicated that the miR-1246 level was significantly enriched in the exosomes of hypoxia glioma cells, which could activated the STAT3 pathway and inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby promoting the polarization of M2 phenotype (52). Nevertheless, although exosomes secreted by tumor cells under hypoxia stress mostly induce M2 polarization of macrophages, strategies to convert TAMs to a predominantly M1 phenotype have been proposed for novel immunotherapy.
MDSC
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are highly heterogeneous immature cells derived from bone marrow that can inhibit the activation of T cells, promote M2 polarization of macrophages, and inhibit NK cytotoxicity (53). Numerous studies have demonstrated that the activation, expansion, and immunosuppression of MDSCs can be promoted by exosomes. However, whether exosomes under hypoxia conditions would have similar effects on the proliferation and immunosuppression of MDSCs remained to be elucidated. In this regard, researchers found that hypoxia can directly stimulate the expressions of HSP72 and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) in exosomes, which can directly participate in the regulation of MDSCs (54, 55). Specifically, Chalmin et al. found that HSP72 in exosomes can mediate the interaction between tumor cells and MDSCs by triggering STAT3 activation (56). Similarly, Xiang et al. found that exosomes released from cultured B16 tumor cells could induce the activation and expansion of MDSC in a TLR2-dependent manner (57). All these results suggest that hypoxia-induced exosomes play a significant role in suppressing tumor immune surveillance by promoting the suppressive function of MDSC.
Although an immunosuppressive milieu mediated by MDSCs has been demonstrated in patients with glioma, the mechanisms of MDSC development and activation have not been elucidated. Guo et al. found that the expression of miR-10a and miR-21 was increased in glioma cells-derived exosomes under hypoxia conditions compared with normoxia (47). Furthermore, they also found that hypoxia-induced glioma cells can stimulate the differentiation of functional MDSCs by transferring exosomal miR-29a and miR-92a to MDSCs (58). Accumulating evidence supports that hypoxia can induce changes in miRNA expression in tumor-derived exosomes, thereby activating MDSCs and enhancing their function to promote tumor growth. This suggests that blocking the immunosuppressive effect of MDSCs may be an effective way to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. Therefore, clarifying the exact effect of hypoxia on the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs may provide new insights for targeting exosomal secretion and its contents (especially miRNAs and proteins) for anti-tumor immunotherapy.
T Cell
T cells are considered to be the major cell subset in anti-tumor immunity. Treg cells are a specialized population of T cells thought to suppress anti-tumor immune responses (59). Studies have reported that miR-214 expression was significantly increased in tumor cell-derived exosomes under hypoxia TME (60). Yin et al. observed that exosomes from lung cancer cell lines can effectively transport miR-214 to CD4+ T cells, thereby promoting the expansion of Treg cell subsets and the secretion of IL-10 (61). A study by Mrizak et al. found that exosomes released from nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells under hypoxia conditions express the chemokine CCL20, leading to preferential recruitment of Treg cells to tumor sites. In addition, these hypoxia-induced exosomes were also able to induce Treg cell expansion and enhance their immunosuppressive effects (62). Collectively, these results suggest that hypoxia participates in Treg cell-mediated immunosuppression by modulating the cargo of exosomes.
On the other hand, hypoxia-induced exosomes can also promote tumor immune escape by directly inhibiting the activity of T cells. Rong et al. found that TGF-β can be delivered to T cells through breast cancer cell-derived exosomes, thereby inhibiting T cell proliferation, while anti-TGF-β treatment reversed the immunosuppressive effects of the exosomes (48). In addition, HIF can also exert an immunosuppressive effect by upregulating the PD-L1 expression in exosomes. The study by Poggio et al. showed that tumor cells can release PD-L1-carrying exosomes under hypoxia conditions, which can function as an immune checkpoint by binding to PD-1 on the surface of activated T cells (63). In patients with gastric cancer, exosome-carried PD-L1 resulted in decreased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration and activity (64). Similarly, higher levels of PD-L1 were found in exosomes from patients with active disease and poor survival (65). Together, these studies suggest the inhibitory effect of hypoxia-induced exosomes on T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity.
NK Cell
There is ample evidence that hypoxia-induced exosomes can evade immune surveillance by binding to NK cells. According to literature reports, the activation of NK cells in anti-tumor immunity is mediated by surface-active receptors, such as NKG2D and NKp44 (66). However, hypoxia-induced exosomes reportedly suppress host NK cell cytotoxicity by reducing NKG2D expression, thereby disrupting the host immune system and promoting the formation of a tumor-promoting microenvironment (67). For example, hypoxia TME can increase the levels of TGF-β1, miRNA-210, and miRNA-23a in exosomes secreted by tumor cells. Specifically, the uptake of hypoxia exosomes by NK cells can transfer TGF-β1 in exosomes to NK cells and inhibit the expression of its surface-activated receptor NKG2D, thereby inhibiting NK cell function. Subsequent miRNA analysis showed highly expressed miR-23a in hypoxia-induced exosomes, which can target the expression of CD107a in NK cells, thereby inhibiting the activation of NK cells (46). Similarly, Xia et al. also described that clear cell renal cancer triggers NK cell dysfunction in an exosome-dependent manner, and this inhibitory function also activates the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway through TGF-β1 (68). In addition, the researchers found that exosomes isolated from the plasma of patients with melanoma contained a large amount of PD-L1, FasL, and TGF-β. These hypoxia-associated exosomes not only inhibited the activity of CD8+ T cells, but also down-regulated NKG2D expression in NK cells. In contrast, targeting these exosomes with monoclonal antibodies or pharmacological inhibitors can restore immune cell function (69).
Exosome-Based Anti-Tumor Immunotherapy
Tumor immunotherapy is a new anti-cancer strategy that kills tumor cells by activating immune cells or restoring exhausted immune cells. As an important regulator of the TME, exosomes-based therapies are considered a promising approach to promoting tumor immunotherapy. For example, exosomes secreted by tumor cells contain a vast number of tumor-associated antigens, such as MHC I and MHC II, that can be used as a tumor vaccine to promote anti-tumor immune responses (70). Hsu et al. found that dendritic cell (DC)-derived exosomes can be loaded with a variety of polypeptide antigens (such as MHC I, MHC II) and co-stimulatory molecules that contribute to the initiation and activation of T cells, such as CD80, CD83, CD86, etc. (71). In a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, subcutaneous injection of exosome-loaded DC vaccine extended survival in mice, while combination therapy with chemotherapeutics such as of gemcitabine simultaneously reduced tumor MDSCs content and increased the activation of T cells (72). In addition, the use of DC cell-derived ovalbumin exosomes to stimulate CD4+ T cells can inhibit the differentiation and proliferation of Treg cells and promote the formation of memory CD8+ T cells. This represents another attractive exosome-based anti-tumor vaccine option (73). In addition, DC-derived exosomes contain NKG2D ligands. Therefore, Viaud et al. reported that DC vaccines can activate NK cells and release TNF (40). However, due to the cargo complexity of exosomes, exosome-based tumor vaccine strategies may also inhibit anti-tumor immunotherapy by inducing apoptosis of activated CD8+ T cells (74). For example, exosomes can impair the activation of T cells by IL-2 and promote the proliferation of Treg cells for immunosuppressive effects (75). Nevertheless, it is still possible to consider optimizing the use of exosome vaccines by modifying the exosomes and adjusting their dosage. For example, Samuel et al. used IFN-γ to stimulate the secretion of exosomes from mature dendritic cells which increased the expression of co-stimulatory molecules in exosomes to enhance T cell activation (74).
Conclusion
In recent years, anti-tumor immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed the treatment option for various tumor types. As mentioned earlier, the infiltration and activation of immune cells in the TME are closely related to successful immunotherapy. Therefore, understanding the impact of exosomes on the anti-tumor immune system can further enhance the effect of immunotherapy. In fact, hypoxia-induced exosomal features have been extensively studied and consensus has been reached. First, hypoxia-induced exosomes are not vesicles loaded with cellular waste, but key mediators of intercellular communication. Second, in the adverse TME such as hypoxia, high glucose and drug therapy, the cargo carried and delivered in exosomes is significantly altered, which in turn modulates immune cell function (76, 77). Third, exosomes secreted by immune cells such as DCs and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) can inhibit the growth, proliferation, and metastasis of tumor cells (78). Therefore, the preparation of exosome-based tumor vaccines to enhance tumor antigen presentation and modulate immune responses in the TME is a potential avenue for therapeutic development.
Further Perspective
While initial preclinical studies have shown promising results, clinical trials have failed to achieve comparable results. This suggests that there are still unresolved challenges with existing exosome treatments (79). For example, existing exosome therapeutics have low targeting efficiency and are easily engulfed by the immune system. In addition, the current exosome isolation methods are expensive, and large-scale exosome isolation technology still needs to be developed (80). Therefore, these problems would need to be solved before clinical application. Moreover, exosome-based immunotherapy is currently still in early clinical trials, and there are no specific international guidelines for the production and application of this novel therapeutic. Future studies should investigate the effects of hypoxia on the formation, release, and cargo components of exosomes, as well as the mechanism by which the hypoxia TME mediates the regulation of immune cell function by exosomes. These studies would not only provide insight into the poor response of cancer immunotherapy regimens in current clinical trials, but may also serve as a reference for exosome application in anti-cancer drug delivery to improve anti-tumor therapy precision.
Author Contributions
WG and TQ drafted the manuscript and carried out the figures in manuscript.literature research of the review, figures and drafted the manuscript. BD performed literature analysis of the review and editing the final manuscript. TL, QL, and XX provided supervision and contributed to the conceptualization of the review. All authors read and approved the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank Bullet Edits Limited for the linguistic editing and proofreading of the manuscript (Anti-counterfeiting Code: 42868a05acb5ba0dae6b21af3085e8fc).
References
1. Goliwas K, Deshane J, Elmets C, Athar M. Moving Immune Therapy Forward Targeting TME. Physiol Rev (2021) 101:417–25. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2020
2. Singleton D, Macann A, Wilson W. Therapeutic Targeting of the Hypoxic Tumour Microenvironment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2021) 18:751–72. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00539-4
3. LaGory E, Giaccia A. The Ever-Expanding Role of HIF in Tumour and Stromal Biology. Nat Cell Biol (2016) 18:356–65. doi: 10.1038/ncb3330
4. Riera-Domingo C, Audigé A, Granja S, Cheng W, Ho P, Baltazar F, et al. Immunity, Hypoxia, and Metabolism-The Ménage À Trois of Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy. Physiol Rev (2020) 100:1–102. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2019
5. Muhsin M, Graham J, Kirkpatrick P. Bevacizumab. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2004) 3:995–6. doi: 10.1038/nrd1601
6. He G, Peng X, Wei S, Yang S, Li X, Huang M, et al. Exosomes in the Hypoxic TME: From Release, Uptake and Biofunctions to Clinical Applications. Mol Cancer (2022) 21:19. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01440-5
7. Pegtel D, Gould S. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem (2019) 88:487–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111902
8. Rezaie J, Aslan C, Ahmadi M, Zolbanin N, Kashanchi F, Jafari R. The Versatile Role of Exosomes in Human Retroviral Infections: From Immunopathogenesis to Clinical Application. Cell biosci (2021) 11:19. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00537-0
9. Vahabi A, Rezaie J, Hassanpour M, Panahi Y, Nemati M, Rasmi Y, et al. Tumor Cells-Derived Exosomal CircRNAs: Novel Cancer Drivers, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Opportunities. Biochem Pharmacol (2022) 200:115038. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115038
10. Abramowicz A, Łabaj W, Mika J, Szołtysek K, Ślęzak-Prochazka I, Mielańczyk Ł., et al. MicroRNA Profile of Exosomes and Parental Cells is Differently Affected by Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res (2020) 194:133–42. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00007
11. Attaran S, Bissell M. The Role of Tumor Microenvironment and Exosomes in Dormancy and Relapse. Semin Cancer Biol (2022) 78:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.09.008
12. Yaghoubi S, Najminejad H, Dabaghian M, Karimi M, Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M, Rad F, et al. How Hypoxia Regulate Exosomes in Ischemic Diseases and Cancer Microenvironment? IUBMB Life (2020) 72:1286–305. doi: 10.1002/iub.2275
13. Kalluri R, LeBleu V. The Biology Function and Biomedical Applications of Exosomes. Sci (New York N.Y.) (2020) 367:eaau6977. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6977
14. Dai J, Su Y, Zhong S, Cong L, Liu B, Yang J, et al. Exosomes: Key Players in Cancer and Potential Therapeutic Strategy. Signal transduct targeted Ther (2020) 5:145. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00261-0
15. Rezaie J, Ahmadi M, Ravanbakhsh R, Mojarad B, Mahbubfam S, Shaban S, et al. Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: The Metastatic Organotropism Drivers. Life Sci (2022) 289:120216. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120216
16. Riau A, Ong H, Yam G, Mehta J. Sustained Delivery System for Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes. Front Pharmacol (2019) 10:1368. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01368
17. Raposo G, Nijman H, Stoorvogel W, Liejendekker R, Harding C, Melief C, et al. B Lymphocytes Secrete Antigen-Presenting Vesicles. J Exp Med (1996) 183:1161–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.1161
18. Xia X, Wang S, Ni B, Xing S, Cao H, Zhang Z, et al. Hypoxic Gastric Cancer-Derived Exosomes Promote Progression and Metastasis via MiR-301a-3p/PHD3/HIF-1α Positive Feedback Loop. Oncogene (2020) 39:6231–44. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01425-6
19. Li L, Li C, Wang S, Wang Z, Jiang J, Wang W, et al. Exosomes Derived From Hypoxic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Deliver miR-21 to Normoxic Cells to Elicit a Prometastatic Phenotype. Cancer Res (2016) 76:1770–80. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1625
20. Wang T, Gilkes D, Takano N, Xiang L, Luo W, Bishop C, et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors and RAB22A Mediate Formation of Microvesicles That Stimulate Breast Cancer Invasion and Metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America (2014) 111:E3234–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410041111
21. Huang X, Ding L, Bennewith K, Tong R, Welford S, Ang K, et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Mir-210 Regulates Normoxic Gene Expression Involved in Tumor Initiation. Mol Cell (2009) 35:856–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.006
22. Tadokoro H, Umezu T, Ohyashiki K, Hirano T, Ohyashiki J. Exosomes Derived From Hypoxic Leukemia Cells Enhance Tube Formation in Endothelial Cells. J Biol Chem (2013) 288:34343–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.480822
23. Zhang X, Sai B, Wang F, Wang L, Wang Y, Zheng L, et al. Hypoxic BMSC-Derived Exosomal miRNAs Promote Metastasis of Lung Cancer Cells via STAT3-Induced EMT. Mol Cancer (2019) 18:40. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0959-5
24. Chen X, Zhou J, Li X, Wang X, Lin Y, Wang X. Exosomes Derived From Hypoxic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells Deliver microRNAs to Macrophages and Elicit a Tumor-Promoted Phenotype. Cancer Lett (2018) 435:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.08.001
25. Zhang W, Zhou X, Yao Q, Liu Y, Zhang H, Dong Z. HIF-1-Mediated Production of Exosomes During Hypoxia is Protective in Renal Tubular Cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2017) 313:F906–13. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00178.2017
26. Liu W, Li L, Rong Y, Qian D, Chen J, Zhou Z, et al. Hypoxic Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Bone Fracture Healing by the Transfer of miR-126. Acta biomaterialia (2020) 103:196–212. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.020
27. Kore R, Edmondson J, Jenkins S, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Dings R, Reyna N, et al. Hypoxia-Derived Exosomes Induce Putative Altered Pathways in Biosynthesis and Ion Regulatory Channels in Glioblastoma Cells. Biochem biophys Rep (2018) 14:104–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2018.03.008
28. Huang Z, Yang M, Li Y, Yang F, Feng Y. Exosomes Derived From Hypoxic Colorectal Cancer Cells Transfer Wnt4 to Normoxic Cells to Elicit a Prometastatic Phenotype. Int J Biol Sci (2018) 14:2094–102. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.28288
29. Schlaepfer I, Nambiar D, Ramteke A, Kumar R, Dhar D, Agarwal C, et al. Hypoxia Induces Triglycerides Accumulation in Prostate Cancer Cells and Extracellular Vesicles Supporting Growth and Invasiveness Following Reoxygenation. Oncotarget (2015) 6:22836–56. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4479
30. Luo W, Hu H, Chang R, Zhong J, Knabel M, O’Meally R, et al. Pyruvate Kinase M2 is a PHD3-Stimulated Coactivator for Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. Cell (2011) 145:732–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.054
31. Wei Y, Wang D, Jin F, Bian Z, Li L, Liang H, et al. Pyruvate Kinase Type M2 Promotes Tumour Cell Exosome Release via Phosphorylating Synaptosome-Associated Protein 23. Nat Commun (2017) 8:14041. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14041
32. Jafari R, Rahbarghazi R, Ahmadi M, Hassanpour M, Rezaie J. Hypoxic Exosomes Orchestrate Tumorigenesis: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. J Trans Med (2020) 18:474. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02662-9
33. Dorayappan K, Wanner R, Wallbillich J, Saini U, Zingarelli R, Suarez A, et al. Hypoxia-Induced Exosomes Contribute to a More Aggressive and Chemoresistant Ovarian Cancer Phenotype: A Novel Mechanism Linking STAT3/Rab Proteins. Oncogene (2018) 37:3806–21. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0189-0
34. Panigrahi G, Praharaj P, Peak T, Long J, Singh R, Rhim J, et al. Hypoxia-Induced Exosome Secretion Promotes Survival of African-American and Caucasian Prostate Cancer Cells. Sci Rep (2018) 8:3853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22068-4
35. Hedlund M, Nagaeva O, Kargl D, Baranov V, Mincheva-Nilsson L. Thermal- and Oxidative Stress Causes Enhanced Release of NKG2D Ligand-Bearing Immunosuppressive Exosomes in Leukemia/Lymphoma T and B Cells. PLoS One (2011) 6:e16899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016899
36. Yokoi A, Ochiya T. Exosomes and Extracellular Vesicles: Rethinking the Essential Values in Cancer Biology. Semin Cancer Biol (2021) 74:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.032
37. Vergani E, Daveri E, Vallacchi V, Bergamaschi L, Lalli L, Castelli C, et al. Extracellular Vesicles in Anti-Tumor Immunity. Semin Cancer Biol (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.09.004
38. Xie Y, Bai O, Zhang H, Yuan J, Zong S, Chibbar R, et al. Membrane-Bound HSP70-Engineered Myeloma Cell-Derived Exosomes Stimulate More Efficient CD8(+) CTL- and NK-Mediated Antitumour Immunity Than Exosomes Released From Heat-Shocked Tumour Cells Expressing Cytoplasmic HSP70. J Cell Mol Med (2010) 14:2655–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00851.x
39. Wang Y, Xiang Y, Xin V, Wang X, Peng X, Liu X, et al. Dendritic Cell Biology and its Role in Tumor Immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol (2020) 13:107. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00939-6
40. Viaud S, Terme M, Flament C, Taieb J, André F, Novault S, et al. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Natural Killer Cell Activation and Proliferation: A Role for NKG2D Ligands and IL-15ralpha. PLoS One (2009) 4:e4942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004942
41. Hao S, Bai O, Yuan J, Qureshi M, Xiang J. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Stimulate Stronger CD8+ CTL Responses and Antitumor Immunity Than Tumor Cell-Derived Exosomes. Cell Mol Immunol (2006) 3:205–11.
42. Park J, Dutta B, Tse S, Gupta N, Tan C, Low J, et al. Hypoxia-Induced Tumor Exosomes Promote M2-Like Macrophage Polarization of Infiltrating Myeloid Cells and microRNA-Mediated Metabolic Shift. Oncogene (2019) 38:5158–73. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0782-x
43. Sun Y, Guo J, Yu L, Guo T, Wang J, Wang X, et al. PD-L1 Exosomes From Bone Marrow-Derived Cells of Tumor-Bearing Mice Inhibit Antitumor Immunity. Cell Mol Immunol (2021) 18:2402–9. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0487-7
44. Chen X, Ying X, Wang X, Wu X, Zhu Q, Wang X. Exosomes Derived From Hypoxic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Deliver microRNA-940 to Induce Macrophage M2 Polarization. Oncol Rep (2017) 38:522–8. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5697
45. Ye S, Zhang H, Cai T, Liu Y, Ni J, He J, et al. Exosomal miR-24-3p Impedes T-Cell Function by Targeting FGF11 and Serves as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. J Pathol (2016) 240:329–40. doi: 10.1002/path.4781
46. Berchem G, Noman M, Bosseler M, Paggetti J, Baconnais S, Le Cam E, et al. Hypoxic Tumor-Derived Microvesicles Negatively Regulate NK Cell Function by a Mechanism Involving TGF-β and Mir23a Transfer. Oncoimmunology (2016) 5:e1062968. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1062968
47. Guo X, Qiu W, Liu Q, Qian M, Wang S, Zhang Z, et al. Immunosuppressive Effects of Hypoxia-Induced Glioma Exosomes Through Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells via the miR-10a/Rora and miR-21/Pten Pathways. Oncogene (2018) 37:4239–59. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0261-9
48. Rong L, Li R, Li S, Luo R. Immunosuppression of Breast Cancer Cells Mediated by Transforming Growth Factor-β in Exosomes From Cancer Cells. Oncol Lett (2016) 11:500–4. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3841
49. Li L, Cao B, Liang X, Lu S, Luo H, Wang Z, et al. Microenvironmental Oxygen Pressure Orchestrates an Anti- and Pro-Tumoral γδ T Cell Equilibrium via Tumor-Derived Exosomes. Oncogene (2019) 38:2830–43. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0627-z
50. Chamseddine A, Assi T, Mir O, Chouaib S. Modulating Tumor-Associated Macrophages to Enhance the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A TAM-Pting Approach. Pharmacol Ther (2022) 231:107986. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107986
51. Ding C, Zheng J, Wang B, Li Y, Xiang H, Dou M, et al. Exosomal MicroRNA-374b-5p From Tubular Epithelial Cells Promoted M1 Macrophages Activation and Worsened Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020) 8:587693. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.587693
52. Qian M, Wang S, Guo X, Wang J, Zhang Z, Qiu W, et al. Hypoxic Glioma-Derived Exosomes Deliver microRNA-1246 to Induce M2 Macrophage Polarization by Targeting TERF2IP via the STAT3 and NF-κb Pathways. Oncogene (2020) 39:428–42. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0996-y
53. Tian X, Shen H, Li Z, Wang T, Wang S. Tumor-Derived Exosomes, Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, and Tumor Microenvironment. J Hematol Oncol (2019) 12:84. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0772-z
54. Hammerer-Lercher A, Mair J, Bonatti J, Watzka S, Puschendorf B, Dirnhofer S. Hypoxia Induces Heat Shock Protein Expression in Human Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts. Cardiovasc Res (2001) 50:115–24. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00198-5
55. Stridh L, Smith P, Naylor A, Wang X, Mallard C. Regulation of Toll-Like Receptor 1 and -2 in Neonatal Mice Brains After Hypoxia-Ischemia. J Neuroinflamm (2011) 8:45. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-45
56. Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Mignot G, Vincent J, Bruchard M, Remy-Martin J, et al. Membrane-Associated Hsp72 From Tumor-Derived Exosomes Mediates STAT3-Dependent Immunosuppressive Function of Mouse and Human Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. J Clin Invest (2010) 120:457–71. doi: 10.1172/JCI40483
57. Xiang X, Liu Y, Zhuang X, Zhang S, Michalek S, Taylor D, et al. TLR2-Mediated Expansion of MDSCs is Dependent on the Source of Tumor Exosomes. Am J Pathol (2010) 177:1606–10. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100245
58. Guo X, Qiu W, Wang J, Liu Q, Qian M, Wang S, et al. Glioma Exosomes Mediate the Expansion and Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Through microRNA-29a/Hbp1 and microRNA-92a/Prkar1a Pathways. Int J Cancer (2019) 144:3111–26. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32052
59. Sharabi A, Tsokos M, Ding Y, Malek T, Klatzmann D, Tsokos G. Regulatory T Cells in the Treatment of Disease. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2018) 17:823–44. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.148
60. Yang K, Zhang J, Bao C. Exosomal Circeif3k From Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Promotes Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Progression via miR-214/PD-L1 Axis. BMC Cancer (2021) 21:933. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08669-9
61. Yin Y, Cai X, Chen X, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Tumor-Secreted miR-214 Induces Regulatory T Cells: A Major Link Between Immune Evasion and Tumor Growth. Cell Res (2014) 24:1164–80. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.121
62. Mrizak D, Martin N, Barjon C, Jimenez-Pailhes A, Mustapha R, Niki T, et al. Effect of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-Derived Exosomes on Human Regulatory T Cells. J Natl Cancer Inst (2015) 107:363. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju363
63. Poggio M, Hu T, Pai C, Chu B, Belair C, Chang A, et al. Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 Induces Systemic Anti-Tumor Immunity and Memory. Cell (2019) 177:414–27.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.016
64. Ricklefs F, Alayo Q, Krenzlin H, Mahmoud A, Speranza M, Nakashima H, et al. Immune Evasion Mediated by PD-L1 on Glioblastoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Sci Adv (2018) 4:eaar2766. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar2766
65. Theodoraki M, Yerneni S, Hoffmann T, Gooding W, Whiteside T. Clinical Significance of PD-L1 Exosomes in Plasma of Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer research: an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res (2018) 24:896–905. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2664
66. Guo A, Jiao Y, Zhao Q, Huang H, Deng J, Zhang C, et al. Implications of the Accumulation of CXCR5 NK Cells in Lymph Nodes of HIV-1 Infected Patients. EBioMedicine (2022) 75:103794. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103794
67. Mincheva-Nilsson L, Baranov V. Cancer Exosomes and NKG2D Receptor-Ligand Interactions: Impairing NKG2D-Mediated Cytotoxicity and Anti-Tumour Immune Surveillance. Semin Cancer Biol (2014) 28:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.02.010
68. Xia Y, Zhang Q, Zhen Q, Zhao Y, Liu N, Li T, et al. Negative Regulation of Tumor-Infiltrating NK Cell in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Through the Exosomal Pathway. Oncotarget (2017) 8:37783–95. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16354
69. Sharma P, Diergaarde B, Ferrone S, Kirkwood J, Whiteside T. Melanoma Cell-Derived Exosomes in Plasma of Melanoma Patients Suppress Functions of Immune Effector Cells. Sci Rep (2020) 10:92. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56542-4
70. Naseri M, Bozorgmehr M, Zöller M, Ranaei Pirmardan E, Madjd Z. Tumor-Derived Exosomes: The Next Generation of Promising Cell-Free Vaccines in Cancer Immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology (2020) 9:1779991. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1779991
71. Hsu D, Paz P, Villaflor G, Rivas A, Mehta-Damani A, Angevin E, et al. Exosomes as a Tumor Vaccine: Enhancing Potency Through Direct Loading of Antigenic Peptides. J immunother (Hagerstown Md.: 1997) (2003) 26:440–50. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200309000-00007
72. Xiao L, Erb U, Zhao K, Hackert T, Zöller M. Efficacy of Vaccination With Tumor-Exosome Loaded Dendritic Cells Combined With Cytotoxic Drug Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer. Oncoimmunology (2017) 6:e1319044. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1319044
73. Xie Y, Wang L, Freywald A, Qureshi M, Chen Y, Xiang J. A Novel T Cell-Based Vaccine Capable of Stimulating Long-Term Functional CTL Memory Against B16 Melanoma via CD40L Signaling. Cell Mol Immunol (2013) 10:72–7. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2012.37
74. Samuel M, Gabrielsson S. Personalized Medicine and Back-Allogeneic Exosomes for Cancer Immunotherapy. J Internal Med (2021) 289:138–46. doi: 10.1111/joim.12963
75. Lu Z, Zuo B, Jing R, Gao X, Rao Q, Liu Z, et al. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Elicit Tumor Regression in Autochthonous Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mouse Models. J Hepatol (2017) 67:739–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.05.019
76. Khaksar M, Sayyari M, Rezaie J, Pouyafar A, Montazersaheb S, Rahbarghazi R. High Glucose Condition Limited the Angiogenic/Cardiogenic Capacity of Murine Cardiac Progenitor Cells in In Vitro and In Vivo Milieu. Cell Biochem Funct (2018) 36:346–56. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3354
77. Soraya H, Sani N, Jabbari N, Rezaie J. Metformin Increases Exosome Biogenesis and Secretion in U87 MG Human Glioblastoma Cells: A Possible Mechanism of Therapeutic Resistance. Arch Med Res (2021) 52:151–62. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.10.007
78. Nikfarjam S, Rezaie J, Kashanchi F, Jafari R. Dexosomes as a Cell-Free Vaccine for Cancer Immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer research: CR (2020) 39:258. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01781-x
79. Cappello F, Fais S. Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Pros and Cons: The Importance of the Evidence-Based Medicine. Semin Cancer Biol (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.01.011
Keywords: hypoxia, exosomes, immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, anti-tumor immunity
Citation: Guo W, Qiao T, Dong B, Li T, Liu Q and Xu X (2022) The Effect of Hypoxia-Induced Exosomes on Anti-Tumor Immunity and Its Implication for Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13:915985. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.915985
Received: 08 April 2022; Accepted: 30 May 2022;
Published: 22 June 2022.
Edited by:
Dianwen Ju, Fudan University, ChinaReviewed by:
Jafar Rezaie, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, IranJessy Deshane, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
Copyright © 2022 Guo, Qiao, Dong, Li, Liu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaofeng Xu, 1536238305@qq.com; Qiang Liu, drliuqiang1978@163.com; Tian Li, tian@fmmu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work