How to Model Rheumatoid Arthritis in Animals: From Rodents to Non-Human Primates

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. At present, rodent models are primarily used to study the pathogenesis and treatment of RA. However, the genetic divergences between rodents and humans determine differences in the development of RA, which makes it necessary to explore the establishment of new models. Compared to rodents, non-human primates (NHPs) are much more closely related to humans in terms of the immune system, metabolic conditions, and genetic make-up. NHPs model provides a powerful tool to study the development of RA and potential complications, as well as preclinical studies in drug development. This review provides a brief overview of the RA animal models, emphasizes the replication methods, pros and cons, as well as evaluates the validity of the rodent and NHPs models.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling, joint tenderness, and destruction of synovial joints, leading to severe disability. Worldwide, the prevalence of RA ranges from 0.5% to 1% (1–3). Despite advances in our understanding of RA pathogenesis and improvements in RA treatment, some RA patients remain refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (4). Therefore, we urgently need to deeply explore the pathogenesis of RA and further search for new therapeutic strategies. Currently, rodents are usually used to study the progression and pathogenesis of RA (5). However, the genetic divergences between rodents and humans determine differences in the development of RA. There is a growing awareness that the evolutionary gap between inbred rodents and outbred humans is too wide for direct translation from rodents to humans.

Crucially, differences in metabolic pathways between rodents and humans further hamper the direct translation of new therapeutic strategies into the clinic. Some biotherapeutic drugs are ineffective in rodent models. In addition, any beneficial effects proven in rodent models do not guarantee the same or similar therapeutic effects in RA patients. Therefore, RA can be modeled using another specie more closely related to humans, such as non-human primates (NHPs) (6). Recently, significant progress has been made in the study of using NHPs to establish RA models.

This mini review provides a brief overview of the RA animal models, emphasizes the replication methods, pros and cons, as well as evaluates the validity of the rodent and NHPs models.

Rodent Animal Models Used in the Study of RA

Induced Arthritis Models

A variety of rodent models have been established to study the etiology and pathogenesis of RA. Rodent RA models mainly include collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), adjuvant arthritis (AA), delayed-type hypersensitivity arthritis (DTHA), anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA)-mediated arthritis, etc.

Collagen-Induced Arthritis

The CIA model is one of the most widely used rodent models of RA, mainly characterized by the destruction of self-collagen tolerance and the production of autoantibodies (7). In 1980, Courtenay et al. proposed using type II collagen (CII) to induce a mouse model of arthritis (8). In mice, bovine CII and complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) were emulsified and injected into the base of the tail to replicate human RA. Rats were modeled by intradermal injection of CII and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) at multiple sites, as well as boosted by intraperitoneal injection one week later (9). The CIA model has become an essential element for testing and developing new biological-based therapies (10, 11). It was once recognized as the best model for RA, but only under certain experimental conditions can it be modeled successfully. Furthermore, the CIA model cannot show RA fluctuations and recurrences, vasculitis symptoms, subcutaneous nodules, or serositis.

Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis

AA is an earlier classical RA animal model, which is widely used in the study of the pathogenesis of RA and the evaluation of anti-arthritis drugs. The bacteriologist Freund created the adjuvant-induced arthritis model in the 1950s, also called Freund’s adjuvant arthritis (12). The CFA-induced arthritis model was established through unilateral subcutaneous injections of 0.1 mL CFA into the hindfoot or tail root (13). It is suitable for studying molecular mechanisms between T cells and subpopulations (14). However, this model lacks the chronic progressive nature of RA, and the pathological changes are self-limiting.

Other Induced models

The DTHA model is a pharmacologically relevant monoarthritis model. It is highly reproducible and has a high incidence rate (15). However, DTHA is self-limiting and inconsistent with the chronic progressive characteristics of RA. A study has shown that a citrullinated fibrinogen-specific T cell line enhances autoimmune arthritis in a mouse model of RA (16). The ACPA-induced arthritis murine model is significant for the in-depth study of citrullinated protein antibody-positive RA pathogenesis and the development of new drugs (17–19). The CAIA model is induced by administering a cocktail of endotoxin and monoclonal antibodies, which is widely used to study the pathogenesis of RA and evaluate therapeutic effects (20). A pristane-induced arthritis model is an essential tool for understanding the mechanism of inflammatory joint disease, especially those depending on T-cell signaling pathways (21, 22). Moreover, antigen-induced arthritis (23), proteoglycan-induced arthritis (24, 25), streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis (26), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase-induced arthritis (27), and other RA animal models have all contributed to the research of RA to a certain extent (28, 29), see Table 1 for more details.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Animal models of RA.

Spontaneous Transgenic Model

In addition to induced arthritis models, the spontaneous RA can also be modeled using transgenic rodents. K/BxN mice have a rapid onset of disease in a short period, which is crucial for the rapid screening of anti-arthritis drugs and new targets (30, 31). The SKG mouse transgenic model belongs to T cell-mediated chronic autoimmune polyarthritis with slow progression (32). IL-1ra gene deficiency causes autoimmunity and joint-specific inflammation. IL-1ra -/- transgenic mice often present clinical features such as inflammatory infiltration and pannus formation (33). The phenotype of the TNF-α transgenic model is stable, and the progression of the disease presents chronic inflammation, which is conducive to the development of drugs and the improvement of diagnosis and treatment technology (34). Most of these models lack or are genetically modified with one specific gene. Considering RA’s polygenic traits, one targeted gene makes the simulation of spontaneous disease models narrower and simpler. These models are used to study the role of a specific gene in RA. The models are hereditary and can be continuously expressed in offspring. Therefore, they are used as tools to study the therapeutic effects for mice that are prone to develop joint inflammation spontaneously.

NHPs Model for RA

Induced Arthritis Models

There are currently few NHPs models to study RA’s etiology and pathogenesis and guide the evaluation of RA therapeutic drugs. NHPs RA models mainly include CIA and citrullinated peptide-induced arthritis (Table 1).

Collagen-Induced Arthritis

CIA can be elicited in susceptible strains of NHPs by immunization with CII, making it a valuable model to better assess the efficacy of novel therapeutic targets and aid their transition through the primary stages of preclinical development (4). An emulsion containing CII and complete Freund’s adjuvant was injected into 10 to 20 sites on the base and back of each macaque’s tail. Three weeks later, macaques were again injected with CII in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant. CII can induce autoimmune polyarthritis with certain RA clinical and immunological features in macaques and marmosets. Like the rodent models, the CIA induction in macaques depends on the synergy of delayed hypersensitivity and immune complex-mediated inflammation (35). Both macaque and marmoset RA models have found that collagen-specific antibodies, especially IgM isotype collagen-specific antibodies, play an essential role in developing CIA models. In about 60% of the monkeys, CIA could be induced, whereas the remaining 40% appeared completely asymptomatic, even after repetitive booster immunizations with CII in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (6, 36). A study found that rhesus monkeys immunized with collagen exhibit varying degrees of RA symptoms, including joint swelling and stiffness, increased proliferation of anti-type II collagen antibodies, and damage to articular cartilage tissues, consistent with observation in the murine system (37). At the same time, mononuclear granulocytes and C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly and remained at a high level. The X-ray images of CIA rhesus monkeys are similar to the results of clinical RA. They both show swelling of soft tissue around the affected joints, localized osteoporosis, joint space narrowing, and bone erosion (38). Compared with rhesus monkeys, the bones and cartilage of common marmosets are less damaged, showing unique extra-articular manifestations of inflammation at the periosteum and subcutaneous tissues (39). The common marmosets are closer to the chronic RA with respect to the chronic disease course and pathomorphological presentation than the more acute monophasic and destructive CIA model in macaques (40, 41). It can serve as a suitable model to bridge the gap between rodents and primates.

Citrullinated Peptides-Induced Arthritis

In the late 1990s, researchers discovered a new autoantibody ACPA in serum samples of RA patients, which has reasonable clinical diagnostic specificity for RA. ACPA antibodies are present in 75% of RA patients, and the specificity of diagnosis is as high as 98% (42). The target antigen of ACPA is a type of citrullinated antigen produced by post-translational modification of protein (protein citrullination). Usually, protein citrullination is catalyzed by protein arginine deiminase (46). ACPA stimulates mononuclear macrophages to produce TNF-α and other pro-inflammatory cytokines to promote inflammatory progress. Studies have found that a short peptide of cyclic citrullinated vimentin conjugated to hemocyanin induces arthritis, which symptoms more similar to the development of human RA in rhesus monkeys (43). The emulsion of cyclic citrullinated vimentin conjugated to hemocyanin was injected subcutaneously into the back of macaques (10 sites, a total of 2 mg) and the macaques received the same dose of booster injection on the fourth and eighth weeks after the first immunization. The prominent presentation was slowly developing joint deformation until the functional impairment of typical joint deformity appeared in the later period of experimental observation, which is similar to the clinical joint swelling and pain of some RA patients. Consistently, the joint deformation is not apparent and is significant in the later stage of the disease. A recent study developed an ACPA-mediated arthritis macaque model based on immunization against citrullinated peptides (42). Macaques can display the symptoms of chronic persistent joint synovitis and persistent bone destruction, reflecting the chronic erosion effect of human RA.

Spontaneous Model

Spontaneous arthritis has been found in NHPs models, mainly macaques (approximately 20%). The IL-7 and IL-15 genes of rhesus macaques have high similarity (96%) and functional homology with humans. There is three MHC class I loci and 3 MHC class II loci (HLA DP, DQ, and DR) in human beings, and macaques have 2 MHC-I loci and 3 MHC class II loci (DP, DQ, DR). Unlike humans, macaques may have several MHC-I alleles on each chromosome and may have a significant cross, which is expected to increase haplotype diversity (47). It was previously shown that cynomolgus monkeys from China (5 years old) can spontaneously develop polyarthritis, local inflammation, significant joint swelling, elevated neutrophils, monocytes, and serum CRP (44). Recent studies have revealed that the heart function of rhesus monkeys with spontaneous RA showed progressive deterioration, and the receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 that binds to the voltage-dependent anion-selective channel 1 is upregulated (45). The innate NHPs animal model of RA can simulate the entire development process of RA from early stage to late stage without external intervention, avoiding artificial injury. Moreover, the pathogenesis and pathological injury are very similar to primary human RA, which can meet the needs of RA at different stages. This model is suitable for studying the effect of specific treatments on the whole course of RA and determining the long-term effects of certain medicines. Some studies have sequenced the macaques’ genome and obtained transgenic macaques (48). We speculate that the genetic engineering model of NHPs may become a new direction of medical research in the future and provide vital information for RA research.

It is worth noting that NHPs should be used following the Four Rs tenet, including replacement, reduction, refinement and rehabilitation. Replacement refers to methods which avoid or replace the use of NHPs with lower animals such as rodents. Reduction means reducing the number of NHPs to a minimum to obtain information from fewer numbers. Refinement is the way experiments are carried out in order to make sure NHPs suffer as little as possible (e.g., improvement in experimental conditions, anesthesia and analgesia for pain relief). Rehabilitation refers to necessary after-care and/or rehabilitation of NHPs post-experimentation. It is also strongly recommended to use humane endpoints to prevent, alleviate, or reduce pain and distress of NHPs. When experiments are completed, animals with untreatable conditions should not experience undue pain or distress and are euthanized in a timely fashion.

Assessing Validity in Animal Models of RA

Developing effective animal models for complex autoimmune diseases, including RA, has proved very challenging, and the various symptoms of RA are challenging to model in any non-human species. There are many possible approaches to create RA animal models, and each animal model should be evaluated based on face, construct, and predictive validity to determine their potential values as a valid model for RA. Face validity is meant by similarities between the model’s outcome measures and the phenotypes of the human RA. The construct validity is understood to be the correlation between the method of modeling and the etiology of human RA. The predictive validity refers to the model’s response to a therapeutic drug used to treat human RA disease (49).

Face Validity

An animal model with high face validity will produce symptoms similar to human diseases. Animal models are mainly determined by general morphological observation, imaging examination, pain threshold, arthritis score index, and laboratory biomarkers like human RA diagnosis. The primary goal of a valid animal model of RA is to exhibit pain, inflammation, joint destruction, and various antibodies.

Pain

Persistent joint pain and tenderness are the main clinical manifestations of RA. Evaluation of potential analgesic therapeutics and elaboration of the neurobiology of pain have heavily relied on pain models developed in rodents. In rodents, hyperalgesia is typically manifested by decreased mechanical withdrawal threshold, thermal withdrawal latency, and expression of pain-related factors (50). In addition, methods to induce chronic pain-like states and quantify changes in nociception that have been developed in rodents could be adapted to NHPs (51). NHPs make better responses to pain than rodents through various facial expressions, vocalizations, and body positions, just like in humans. This suggests that NHPs have higher face validity compared to rodents.

Inflammation

The serum level of CRP is a handy marker for systemic inflammation. Serum CRP concentration can directly reflect the intensity of the RA pathological process and can be used as an early marker for disease onset (52). The serum level of CRP is closely related to IL-6. It can induce the production of autoantibodies, and its consistency with the treatment response is more significant than the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (53). In a rhesus monkey CIA model, serum IL-6 levels were also related to clinical and laboratory parameters such as CRP, MMP3, anti-CII antibodies, STS score, and creatinine (37). In addition, interferon γ is a potent pro-inflammatory factor, which is widely involved in inflammatory reactions and may play an essential role in the pathogenesis of RA (54).

Joint destruction

Urinary excretion rates of hydroxylysylpyridinoline (HP) and lysylpyridinoline (LP) can serve as biomarkers for joint destruction. About 95% of the cross-links in the joint cartilage of the rhesus monkey consist of HP, while the HP/LP ratio in bone is 3.8% (55). The excretion rate of HP and LP can increase during the active period of the CIA. Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is an effective index of bone metabolism, which is mainly produced in the liver and osteoblasts and is related to RA (56). Changes in ALP may indicate increased bone metabolism. MMP-3 is one of the most significant degradation enzymes of the cartilage matrix. It can be used as a laboratory indicator to evaluate joint damage status and treatment effect, proving superior to other traditional and conventional laboratory indicators (57).

Antibodies

RA markers with clinical significance include various autoantibodies, rheumatoid factors, and ACPA. Among them, ACPA plays a vital role in diagnosing and treating RA. Commonly used citrullinated protein-related antibodies include anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), anti-keratin (aka), and anti-perinuclear factor (APF) (58). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP are also associated with RA. Combined with different markers, the comprehensive diagnosis of RA has more clinical significance, which is helpful to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of RA animal model diagnosis.

Construct Validity

Construct validity is very important in assessing the validity of animal models of RA. Early efforts to develop animal models of RA were hampered by a lack of understanding of the underlying causes of RA. Animal model experiments are now permitted to assess risk factors (environmental factors, genetic susceptibility, and immune system disorders) identified through RA patient studies. It is worth noting that RA rodent models are all established under certain experimental conditions, focusing on one or several factors, and cannot fully reflect all the characteristics of human RA. However, the macaques can spontaneously develop RA with the increase of age (45). Therefore, compared with rodents, NHPs may demonstrate better construct validity.

Predictive Validity

Predictive validity refers to treatments that alleviate human disease symptoms and reverse pathological features in animal models. With the development of new drugs for RA, the predictive validity of animal models for RA may specifically target pivotal cytokines in the inflammatory cascade in RA and its complications, such as dyslipidemia and anemia (59). Although rodent models developed over the past few decades have helped to identify new therapeutic targets for RA, NHPs are more closely related to humans in genetic evolution and immunological responses, and therefore represent a model with good predictive validity for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new therapies.

In conclusion, evaluating the validity of RA animal models will help us further understand RA’s pathogenesis and develop safe and effective therapeutic strategies. However, an ideal animal model of RA must balance biological feasibility and practical considerations. NHPs are often expensive and difficult to reproduce. In rodent models, up to 10 mice per analysis are used to see significant treatment effects, whereas the minimum number of NHPs is around 3. Despite some limitations, NHPs have substantial advantages in the face, construct, and predictive validity, which are more suited to pre-clinical drug development studies for RA.

Conclusion and Perspectives

The cornerstone of RA research is the development of animal models to mimic human autoimmune system disorder and test novel pharmacologic targets. Preclinical and clinical studies are required to develop and demonstrate the efficacy of new drugs for RA patients. As far as animal model research is concerned, there is no animal model with all the characteristics of human RA. Each model has its own features.

Statistics indicated that approximately 90% of the animals applied in the research were mice, rats, and other rodents (60). However, the genetic divergences between rodents and humans determine differences in the development of RA. More than 70 million years ago, rodents and humans diverged from each other (61). Although RA can be modeled in rodents, their immune response may differ from NHPs or humans. The joint structure of rodents is too small, which is not conducive to implementing various imaging methods. A unique feature of NHPs is the possibility of obtaining complete clinical chemistry and hematological analysis, giving additional insights into the disease status and the general physical condition of the animal (62). Compared with rodents, NHPs biology is most phenotypically comparable to humans biology, including genetics, immunities, metabolomics, and pathologies (63). For example, the expression of toll-like receptors (TLRs) among different dendritic cells (DC) subsets is identical between humans and macaques but differs from murine DCs (64). In 2007, the cynomolgus macaque genome was sequenced, and it is 93% similar to the human genome, making them valuable animal models compared to rodents for the study of human diseases, e.g., RA (65). It can better simulate the common parts of human RA that produce symptoms. Moreover, the characterization of RA models in NHPs will provide insights into mechanisms and new therapies that cannot be addressed by other animal models.

Therefore, NHPs may be an ideal natural model for clinical RA, or they will become an excellent resource for studying the pathogenesis of RA and guiding the search for new therapeutic targets.

Author Contributions

LL, ZL and DQ raised the idea and supervised the work. TZ, ZX and YX performed the literature search and data analysis. TZ, LL, ZL and DQ wrote the manuscript. LL, ZL and DQ revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31960178, 81960863, 81960870, 82160901); Construction Project of National Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base (2018 No. 131); Yunnan Provincial Fund for Medical Research Center: Clinical Evaluation and Basic Research on the Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and gout by Traditional Chinese medicine (202102AA310006); Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Warming yang and Smoothening Meridians (201507001-07, registration number: ChiCTR-INR-16010290); Clinical Cooperative Project of Chinese and Western Medicine for Major and Knotty Diseases; Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory Construction Project Funding; Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Rheumatology and Immunology; Yunnan Provincial “Ten Thousands Program” Famous Doctor Special; Yunnan Province Qingguo Wang Expert Workstation Construction Project (202005AF150017); Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects-Union Foundation (2019FF002(-031)); Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Yunnan Province (2019FA007); Scientific Research Fund Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education (2021Y461).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Alamanos Y, Drosos AA. Epidemiology of Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis. Autoimmun Rev (2005) 4(3):130–6. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2004.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Otón T, Carmona L. The Epidemiology of Established Rheumatoid Arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2019) 33(5):101477. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review. Jama (2018) 320(13):1360–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Na HS, Lee SY, Min HK, Park WJ, Lee JH, Cho KH, et al. The Establishment of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Primate Model in Macaca Fascicularis. J Trans Med (2020) 18(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02402-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Choudhary N, Bhatt LK, Prabhavalkar KS. Experimental Animal Models for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol (2018) 40(3):193–200. doi: 10.1080/08923973.2018.1434793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Vierboom MP, Jonker M, Tak PP, t Hart BA. Preclinical Models of Arthritic Disease in Non-Human Primates. Drug Discov Today (2007) 12(7-8):327–35. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Brand DD, Latham KA, Rosloniec EF. Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Nat Protoc (2007) 2(5):1269–75. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Courtenay JS, Dallman MJ, Dayan AD, Martin A, Mosedale B. Immunisation Against Heterologous Type II Collagen Induces Arthritis in Mice. Nature (1980) 283(5748):666–8. doi: 10.1038/283666a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Seeuws S, Jacques P, Van Praet J, Drennan M, Coudenys J, Decruy T, et al. A Multiparameter Approach to Monitor Disease Activity in Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2010) 12(4):R160–R. doi: 10.1186/ar3119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Pei B, Chen K, Zhou S, Min D, Xiao W. IL-38 Restrains Inflammatory Response of Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Rats via SIRT1/HIF-1α Signaling Pathway. Biosci Rep (2020) 40(5):BSR20182431. doi: 10.1042/bsr20182431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen M, You G, Xie C, Yang R, Hu W, Zheng Z, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Metformin in Collagen-Induced Arthritis Rats. Biochem Pharmacol (2021) 185:114413. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Pearson CM. Development of Arthritis, Periarthritis and Periostitis in Rats Given Adjuvants. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med Soc Exp Biol Med (1956) 91(1):95–101. doi: 10.3181/00379727-91-22179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Shen CH, Liu CT, Song XJ, Zeng WY, Lu XY, Zheng ZL, et al. Evaluation of Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Rubia Cordifolia L. By Spectrum-Effect Relationships. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci (2018) 1090:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.05.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. van Eden W, Thole JE, van der Zee R, Noordzij A, van Embden JD, Hensen EJ, et al. Cloning of the Mycobacterial Epitope Recognized by T Lymphocytes in Adjuvant Arthritis. Nature (1988) 331(6152):171–3. doi: 10.1038/331171a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Atkinson SM, Usher PA, Kvist PH, Markholst H, Haase C, Nansen A. Establishment and Characterization of a Sustained Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Model With Arthritic Manifestations in C57BL/6J Mice. Arthritis Res Ther (2012) 14(3):R134. doi: 10.1186/ar3867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cordova KN, Willis VC, Haskins K, Holers VM. A Citrullinated Fibrinogen-Specific T Cell Line Enhances Autoimmune Arthritis in a Mouse Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Immunol (2013) 190(4):1457–65. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kuhn KA, Kulik L, Tomooka B, Braschler KJ, Arend WP, Robinson WH, et al. Antibodies Against Citrullinated Proteins Enhance Tissue Injury in Experimental Autoimmune Arthritis. J Clin Invest (2006) 116(4):961–73. doi: 10.1172/jci25422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dusad A, Duryee MJ, Shaw AT, Klassen LW, Anderson DR, Wang D, et al. Induction of Bone Loss in DBA/1J Mice Immunized With Citrullinated Autologous Mouse Type II Collagen in the Absence of Adjuvant. Immunol Res (2014) 58(1):51–60. doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8479-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wigerblad G, Bas DB, Fernades-Cerqueira C, Krishnamurthy A, Nandakumar KS, Rogoz K, et al. Autoantibodies to Citrullinated Proteins Induce Joint Pain Independent of Inflammation via a Chemokine-Dependent Mechanism. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75(4):730–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nandakumar KS, Holmdahl R. Collagen Antibody Induced Arthritis. Methods Mol Med (2007) 136:215–23. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-402-5_16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Li X, Gao F, Zhu W, Jiang C, Xu J, Zhang J, et al. Pristane Promotes Anaerobic Glycolysis to Facilitate Proinflammatory Activation of Macrophages and Development of Arthritis. Exp Cell Res (2021) 398(1):112404. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Holmdahl R, Lorentzen JC, Lu S, Olofsson P, Wester L, Holmberg J, et al. Arthritis Induced in Rats With Nonimmunogenic Adjuvants as Models for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunol Rev (2001) 184:184–202. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1840117.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. van den Berg WB, Joosten LA, van Lent PL. Murine Antigen-Induced Arthritis. Methods Mol Med (2007) 136:243–53. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-402-5_18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ishikawa LL, Colavite PM, da Rosa LC, Balbino B, França TG, Zorzella-Pezavento SF, et al. Commercial Bovine Proteoglycan Is Highly Arthritogenic and Can Be Used as an Alternative Antigen Source for PGIA Model. BioMed Res Int (2014) 2014:148594. doi: 10.1155/2014/148594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hanyecz A, Berlo SE, Szántó S, Broeren CP, Mikecz K, Glant TT. Achievement of a Synergistic Adjuvant Effect on Arthritis Induction by Activation of Innate Immunity and Forcing the Immune Response Toward the Th1 Phenotype. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50(5):1665–76. doi: 10.1002/art.20180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kimpel D, Dayton T, Kannan K, Wolf RE. Streptococcal Cell Wall Arthritis: Kinetics of Immune Cell Activation in Inflammatory Arthritis. Clin Immunol (Orlando Fla) (2002) 105(3):351–62. doi: 10.1006/clim.2002.5305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bockermann R, Schubert D, Kamradt T, Holmdahl R. Induction of a B-Cell-Dependent Chronic Arthritis With Glucose-6-Phosphate Isomerase. Arthritis Res Ther (2005) 7(6):R1316–24. doi: 10.1186/ar1829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Carlsen S, Nandakumar KS, Bäcklund J, Holmberg J, Hultqvist M, Vestberg M, et al. Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Induction of Chronic Arthritis in Mice. Arthritis Rheum (2008) 58(7):2000–11. doi: 10.1002/art.23554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhao Y, Urbonaviciute V, Xu B, Cai W, Sener Z, Ge C, et al. Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Induced Arthritis-A New Model for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the C57BL/6 Mouse. Front Immunol (2021) 12:631249. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.631249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kouskoff V, Korganow AS, Duchatelle V, Degott C, Benoist C, Mathis D. Organ-Specific Disease Provoked by Systemic Autoimmunity. Cell (1996) 87(5):811–22. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81989-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Korganow AS, Ji H, Mangialaio S, Duchatelle V, Pelanda R, Martin T, et al. From Systemic T Cell Self-Reactivity to Organ-Specific Autoimmune Disease via Immunoglobulins. Immunity (1999) 10(4):451–61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80045-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sakaguchi N, Takahashi T, Hata H, Nomura T, Tagami T, Yamazaki S, et al. Altered Thymic T-Cell Selection Due to a Mutation of the ZAP-70 Gene Causes Autoimmune Arthritis in Mice. Nature (2003) 426(6965):454–60. doi: 10.1038/nature02119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Horai R, Saijo S, Tanioka H, Nakae S, Sudo K, Okahara A, et al. Development of Chronic Inflammatory Arthropathy Resembling Rheumatoid Arthritis in Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist-Deficient Mice. J Exp Med (2000) 191(2):313–20. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.2.313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H, Georgopoulos S, Kaslaris E, Kioussis D, et al. Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Tumour Necrosis Factor: A Predictive Genetic Model of Arthritis. EMBO J (1991) 10(13):4025–31. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04978.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Vierboom MP, Jonker M, Bontrop RE, t Hart B. Modeling Human Arthritic Diseases in Nonhuman Primates. Arthritis Res Ther (2005) 7(4):145–54. doi: 10.1186/ar1773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Vierboom M, Breedveld E, Kondova I, t Hart BA. The Significance of Non-Human Primates as Preclinical Models of Human Arthritic Disease. Expert Opin Drug Discovery (2008) 3(3):299–310. doi: 10.1517/17460441.3.3.299

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Choi EW, Kim S. Relationships Between Cytokine Levels and Disease Parameters During the Development of a Collagen-Induced Arthritis Model in Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca Fascicularis). Comp Med (2019) 69(3):228–39. doi: 10.30802/aalas-cm-18-000058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Shichang H, Zeng W, Pan L, Li D, Gong L. Pharmacodynamic Study of Adalimumab on the Rhesus Monkey Arthritis Induced by Collagen. West China J Pharm Sci (2017) 32(01):43–6. doi: 10.13375/j.cnki.wcjps.2017.01.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jagessar SA, Vierboom M, Blezer EL, Bauer J, Hart BA, Kap YS. Overview of Models, Methods, and Reagents Developed for Translational Autoimmunity Research in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix Jacchus). Exp Anim (2013) 62(3):159–71. doi: 10.1538/expanim.62.159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Prins NW, Pohlmeyer EA, Debnath S, Mylavarapu R, Geng S, Sanchez JC, et al. Common Marmoset (Callithrix Jacchus) as a Primate Model for Behavioral Neuroscience Studies. J Neurosci Methods (2017) 284:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Vierboom MP, Breedveld E, Kondova I, t Hart BA. Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Common Marmosets: A New Nonhuman Primate Model for Chronic Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2010) 12(5):R200. doi: 10.1186/ar3172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Bitoun S, Roques P, Larcher T, Nocturne G, Serguera C, Chrétien P, et al. Both Systemic and Intra-Articular Immunization With Citrullinated Peptides Are Needed to Induce Arthritis in the Macaque. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1816. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Li C, Beijia Y, Yannan B, Yanyan C, Yong C, Xiaowen G, et al. Study on Rhesus Monkeys' Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis Induced by a Synthetic Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide. Chin J Immunol (2019) 35(16):1937–43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2019.16.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Takei S. A Case Report of Spontaneous Polyarthritis in Cynomolgus Monkeys. J Vet Med Sci (2013) 75(4):531–4. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zeng F, Wen W, Cui W, Zheng W, Liu Y, Sun X, et al. Central Role of RIPK1-VDAC1 Pathway on Cardiac Impairment in a Non-Human Primate Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Mol Cell Cardiol (2018) 125:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.10.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Szekanecz Z, Soós L, Szabó Z, Fekete A, Kapitány A, Végvári A, et al. Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: As Good as It Gets? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol (2008) 34(1):26–31. doi: 10.1007/s12016-007-8022-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Maufort JP, Israel JS, Brown ME, Kempton SJ, Albano NJ, Zeng W, et al. Major Histocompatibility Complex-Matched Arteries Have Similar Patency to Autologous Arteries in a Mauritian Cynomolgus Macaque Major Histocompatibility Complex-Defined Transplant Model. J Am Heart Assoc (2019) 8(15):e012135. doi: 10.1161/jaha.119.012135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Liu Z, Li X, Zhang JT, Cai YJ, Cheng TL, Cheng C, et al. Autism-Like Behaviours and Germline Transmission in Transgenic Monkeys Overexpressing Mecp2. Nature (2016) 530(7588):98–102. doi: 10.1038/nature16533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Qin D, Wu S, Chen Y, Hu X. Behavioral Screening Tools for Identifying Autism in Macaques: Existing and Promising Tests. Brain Res Bull (2019) 146:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.12.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Zhou LL, Zhu YM, Qian FY, Yuan CC, Yuan DP, Zhou XP. MicroRNA−143−3p Contributes to the Regulation of Pain Responses in Collagen−Induced Arthritis. Mol Med Rep (2018) 18(3):3219–28. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Hama AT, Toide K, Takamatsu H. Beyond Rodent Models of Pain: non-Human Primate Models for Evaluating Novel Analgesic Therapeutics and Elaborating Pain Mechanisms. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets (2013) 12(8):1257–70. doi: 10.2174/18715273113129990111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Fang Z, Lv J, Wang J, Qin Q, He J, Wang M, et al. C-Reactive Protein Promotes the Activation of Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Immunol (2020) 11:958. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Narazaki M, Tanaka T, Kishimoto T. The Role and Therapeutic Targeting of IL-6 in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol (2017) 13(6):535–51. doi: 10.1080/1744666x.2017.1295850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Kato M. New Insights Into IFN-γ in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Role in the Era of JAK Inhibitors. Immunol Med (2020) 43(2):72–8. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2020.1751908

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hart BA, Bank RA, De Roos JA, Brok H, Jonker M, Theuns HM, et al. Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Rhesus Monkeys: Evaluation of Markers for Inflammation and Joint Degradation. Br J Rheumatol (1998) 37(3):314–23. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.3.314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Chandrupatla D, Molthoff CFM, Ritsema W, Vos R, Elshof E, Matsuyama T, et al. Prophylactic and Therapeutic Activity of Alkaline Phosphatase in Arthritic Rats: Single-Agent Effects of Alkaline Phosphatase and Synergistic Effects in Combination With Methotrexate. Trans Res J Lab Clin Med (2018) 199:24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2018.04.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Lerner A, Neidhöfer S, Reuter S, Matthias T. MMP3 is a Reliable Marker for Disease Activity, Radiological Monitoring, Disease Outcome Predictability, and Therapeutic Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2018) 32(4):550–62. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Goldbach-Mansky R, Lee J, McCoy A, Hoxworth J, Yarboro C, Smolen JS, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated Autoantibodies in Patients With Synovitis of Recent Onset. Arthritis Res (2000) 2(3):236–43. doi: 10.1186/ar93

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Vierboom M, Breedveld E, t Hart BA. New Drug Discovery Strategies for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Niche for Nonhuman Primate Models to Address Systemic Complications in Inflammatory Arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Discov (2012) 7(4):315–25. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2012.666523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Phillips KA, Bales KL, Capitanio JP, Conley A, Czoty PW, t Hart BA, et al. Why Primate Models Matter. Am J Primatol (2014) 76(9):801–27. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Sodergren EJ, Scherer S, et al. Genome Sequence of the Brown Norway Rat Yields Insights Into Mammalian Evolution. Nature (2004) 428(6982):493–521. doi: 10.1038/nature02426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Croll L, Szabo CA, Abou-Madi N, Devinsky O. Epilepsy in Nonhuman Primates. Epilepsia (2019) 60(8):1526–38. doi: 10.1111/epi.16089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Lane MA. Nonhuman Primate Models in Biogerontology. Exp Gerontol (2000) 35(5):533–41. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00102-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Chung E, Amrute SB, Abel K, Gupta G, Wang Y, Miller CJ, et al. Characterization of Virus-Responsive Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in the Rhesus Macaque. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2005) 12(3):426–35. doi: 10.1128/cdli.12.3.426-435.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Roodgar M, Babveyh A, Nguyen LH, Zhou W, Sinha R, Lee H, et al. Chromosome-Level De Novo Assembly of the Pig-Tailed Macaque Genome Using Linked-Read Sequencing and HiC Proximity Scaffolding. Gigascience (2020) 9(7):giaa069. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar