Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 31 March 2022
Sec. T Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Revisiting the Thymus: The Origin of T cells View all 14 articles

Transcriptional Regulation of Early T-Lymphocyte Development in Thymus

  • 1Department of Pathogenic Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Shanghai Immune Therapy Institute, Renji Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 3Institute of Immunology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

T-lymphocytes play crucial roles for maintaining immune homeostasis by fighting against various pathogenic microorganisms and establishing self-antigen tolerance. They will go through several stages and checkpoints in the thymus from progenitors to mature T cells, from CD4-CD8- double negative (DN) cells to CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) cells, finally become CD4+ or CD8+ single positive (SP) cells. The mature SP cells then emigrate out of the thymus and further differentiate into distinct subsets under different environment signals to perform specific functions. Each step is regulated by various transcriptional regulators downstream of T cell receptors (TCRs) that have been extensively studied both in vivo and vitro via multiple mouse models and advanced techniques, such as single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq). This review will summarize the transcriptional regulators participating in the early stage of T cell development reported in the past decade, trying to figure out cascade networks in each process and provide possible research directions in the future.

Introduction

T cells widely participate in the innate and adaptive immune responses throughout the lifetime. T cell development is tightly regulated by numerous factors including transcriptional and epigenetic regulators. The proper development and differentiation of thymocytes is the foundation for the function of the immune system.

There is no doubt that the thymus is the fundamental place of thymocytes development that is highly organized, where thymocytes go through several stages and checkpoints before maturation and under-control of a network of multiple players (1, 2). Thymocyte development is driven by TCR activation and can be disrupted by defects in signaling components involved in the TCR signaling pathways (3, 4).

The early thymic precursor (ETPs) that come from bone marrow will go through different thymocyte developmental stages including CD4-CD8- double negative (DN), CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) and CD4+CD8- or CD4-CD8+ single positive (SP). Then, mature SP cells will migrate to the periphery. Particularly, the DN population can be divided into four stages according to the expression of CD25 and CD44, starting from DN1 (CD44+CD25-), followed by DN2 (CD44+CD25+), DN3 (CD44-CD25+) and DN4 (CD44-CD25-) (5). In addition, the DN1 cells are known as ETPs. There are several check points during T cell development. β-selection is the first major checkpoint occurs at the DN3 stage. At this stage, a properly rearranged TCRβ chain will be produced that mediated by recombinant activating genes 1 and 2 (RAG1 and RAG2). Cells with successful β-selection downregulate the expression of CD25 and become DN4 cells, which then progress to the DP cells through the immature CD8 single positive (ISP) stage. In contrast, unsuccessful β-selection of DN3 cells will undergo apoptosis.

At the DP stage, TCRα gene rearrangements initiate and mature αβ-TCR will be produced. Subsequently, thymocytes must pass through both positive and negative selections to become mature T cells. Thymocytes with functional TCRs interact with the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on cortical epithelial cells (cTECs) presenting foreign antigens will survive (6). Thus, positive selection is vital for MHC restrictions. During negative selection, thymocytes respond to self-antigens presented by mTECs (medullary epithelial cells) will be eliminated. Finally, the selected thymocytes differentiate into mature SP cells, emigrate out of thymus to periphery, and then differentiate into distinct functional subsets such as regulatory T cells (Treg), helper T cells (Th) and cytotoxic T cells. Less than 5% DP thymocytes will survive during all the checkpoints.

Each developmental step requires the participants of transcriptional regulators that have been elucidated through advanced genomic techniques to identify the binding sites (79). The transcription factors bind to regulatory elements of target genes, such as promoters, enhancers or silencers, to regulate the gene expression. In this review, we will briefly summarize the critical transcriptional factors and related epigenetic regulators during the T-lymphocyte development reported in the past decade and provide a comprehensive understanding of the thymocytes regulation.

DN Stages

Notch signaling is one of the most important pathways to initiate the transcriptional program of the progenitor cells (10). Firstly, Notch signaling induces T cell-specific transcription factor TCF-1 (T cell factor 1, encoded by Tcf7 gene) expression at the ETP stage. Then lead to the activation of two major target genes, Gata3 and Bcl11b (B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 11B) (11). Three waves of chromatin remodeling were observed at the ETP, DN2b and SP stage respectively. TCF-1 is enriched at recognition sites and regulatory regions that become accessible during the ETP and DN2b wave and persist until maturation in both humans and mice (12, 13). TCF-1 deficiency at distinct phases redirects bifurcation among divergent cell fates and subdivide the DN cells to different clusters via scRNA-seq. In addition, TCF-1 directly binds and mediates chromatin accessibility contributing to tumorigenesis (14). Moreover, TCF-1 is also found to directly interact with actin-nucleating factor WASp by ChIP-seq to promote T cell development (15). Most recently, Notch1 target genes HES1 and HES4 have been reported to be upregulated in a Notch-dependent manner promoting early T-cell development (16). Collectively, these studies emphasize the essential role of TCF-1 and Notch signaling in regulating T cell development.

Gata3 and Bcl11b are the major targets of TCF-1. Gata3 is a member of the Gata transcription factor family, plays multiple roles in the transcriptional network of thymocyte development. Gata3 deficiency will affect T-cell survival, growth, commitment and progression into mature cells. Gata3 has been proved to be additionally required at the earliest stage of thymopoiesis for the development of ETP population and DN2 to DN4 stages, since the mRNA levels of Gata3 are gradually increased between the ETP and DN3 stages and slightly diminish again in DN4 cells (7, 17). In mouse DN4 cells, Gata3 is bound by F-box protein Fbw7 and augmented in Fbw7-deficient thymocytes (18), while it is negatively regulated by E-box binding protein HEB via Notch1 (19). Furthermore, Gata3 positively regulates Bcl11b at the transition stage of T cell commitment. Over 10 years ago, the important roles of Bcl11b in the differentiation and survival of DN cells have been revealed (2022). It is stimulated not only by Notch signaling but also by MAP kinase-and Gsk3-dependent signaling. The kinetic modifications of Bcl11b in DN cells are somewhat different from the patterns observed in DP cells, suggesting the essential function of Bcl11b in DN to DP transition (23). In addition, the expression of Bcl11b is impaired in CD147 deficient mice which results in failed T cell identity determination (24). More interestingly, the intraepithelial lymphocytes are decreased when Bcl11b is deficient (25). Cooperating with Bcl protein, transcription factor NFATc1 also plays a critical role in DN thymocytes survival and differentiation (26). It is activated by IL-7-Jak3 signals during the DN1 to DN3 stages (27, 28).

The function of each RUNT-related transcription factors (Runx) family member is still poorly understood based on current studies. Nevertheless, it is well known that Runx family members, including Runx1, Runx2 and Runx3 are another crucial transcription factors facilitating early T cell development. The activity of Runx1 has been highlighted in the relationship with other key transcription factors such as Bcl11b and Pu.1, which regulate the dynamic changes of transcriptional signatures before and after T cell commitment respectively. In addition, enforced expression of Runx2 affects β-selection resulting in an expansion of DN cells (29). The intronic silencer (S4) of Cd4 gene cooperates with RUNX which is involved in T-helper inducing POZ-Kruppel factor (ThPOK) pathway (30). Herein, Runx family members are involved in various stages such as β-selection of double-negative thymocytes (22). The hypomorphic mutation of Runx component core-binding factor β (Cbfβ) results in a consecutive differentiation block within the DN population, as evidenced by a decrease of ETP followed by an inefficient ETP-to-DN2 transition as well as DN2-to-DN3 transition (22, 31).

DN-to-DP Transition

T cells that have formed a functional pre-TCR complex, consisting of CD3, TCRβ, and pre-TCRα, can develop into DP cells. As a consequence, pre-TCR signaling is required for thymocyte development from DN to DP cells, following by dozens of transcriptional responses to pre-TCR signaling (32, 33). Moreover, pre-TCR signaling leads to increased expression of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6 which is required for differentiation to DP cells (34). Another member of the Bcl family is the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl2, whose down regulation induces enhanced apoptosis during the transition from the DN3 to the DN4 stage and contribute to DN4 cell number reduction. While the proliferation of ISP thymocytes is compensated, the number of ISP cells is normal eventually (35, 36). The successful assembly of pre-TCR promotes rapid self-renewal of DN3b cells and sequentially differentiate into cycling DN4, CD8 ISP and early DP (eDP) blast cells, then stop proliferating to become quiescent late DP (lDP) cells (37). TCR has multiple gene segments as alpha, beta, gamma and delta (Tcra, Tcrb, Tcrg and Tcrd). Murine Tcra and Tcrd are organized into a single genetic locus (Tcra/Tcrd locus) that undergoes V(D)J recombination in DN thymocytes to assemble the Tcrd gene and in DP thymocytes to assemble Tcra gene, to generate diverse TCR repertoires (38, 39). In addition, the formation of a functional VDJ join signals is required for robust proliferation of DN thymocytes and their differentiation into DP cells, whereas Tcrb recombination is suppressed by allelic exclusion (40).

Subsequently, pre-TCR complexes activate Notch1, whose activation is essential for generating the huge pool of DP thymocytes as physiological Notch1 signals are highest expressed in DN3 cells and decreased in DP cells. Thus, Notch1 signaling is crucial and transiently upregulated in DN-to-DP transition. There are two types of Notch1 related transcriptional regulators which are activators and repressors. Notch1 can be activated by Delta-like Notch ligands such as DL4, which is critically regulated by Lunatic Fringe (Lfng) (41, 42). Another activator is Zmiz1, which is a stage-specific cofactor of Notch1. Withdrawal of Zmiz1 at the later pre-T cell stage impairs the DN-to-DP transition by inhibiting proliferation. Furthermore, the Zmiz1-deficient DN-to-DP defect can be rescued by enforced activation of Notch1 or its target gene (43). However, DN4 and DP cells will be oncogenic when Notch1 is activated inappropriately (44). The repressors of Notch1 are vital for homeostasis. It is confirmed that Notch1 signaling can be attenuated by Bcl6 (34), NKAP (45) and Early growth response 2 (Egr-2) (46) in ISP thymocytes. Forced expression of these repressors may result in a severe reduction of DP cells in the thymus. Furthermore, downstream transcriptional factors of Notch1 also influence DN-to-DP transition. Induced TCF-1 form complex with β-catenin that will lead to transcriptional activation of cell-fate specific target genes in the transition and DP thymocytes survival via canonical Wnt pathway. On the contrary, TCF-1 interacts with co-repressors such as Groucho/Transducin-like enhancer (GRG/TLE) and turns off-target gene expression in the absence of Wnt signals. In the absence of TCF-1, ISP thymocyte development is blocked which contributes to DP thymocytes reduction (47).

As we mentioned in the previous section, Runx1 binds to the CD4 silencer and represses transcription factors in immature DN thymocytes followed by CD8 expression to promote DN-to-DP transition, then down regulate in DP stage (48). The growth rate of DN4 cells and the transition of DN4 to the DP stage are impaired by overexpressed Runx1, resulting in the substantial reduction of DP thymocytes (49). Coincidentally, a sequence-specific transcription factor Ets1 specifically associates with Runx1 in DN and TCF-1 in DP cells by binding distal nucleosome-occupied and depleted regions respectively (50). Another critical transcription factors family is Ikaros which transiently increased from DN to DP developmental stage (51). Nevertheless, Ikaros maybe not a conventional activator or repressor according to defined sets of genes (52). As a tumor suppressor, Ikaros directly repress most Notch target genes through genome-wide analyses, such as ChIP-seq (53). Furthermore, a newly reported transcriptional regulator, Zinc finger protein Yin Yang 1 (YY1), is functional in DN thymocytes survival and apoptosis by suppressing the expression of p53, which can eliminate thymocytes that fail to pass β-selection. Early ablation of YY1 caused severely impaired development to DP cells due to increased apoptosis of DN thymocytes that prevented the expansion of post-β-selection thymocytes (54). Nevertheless, the comprehensive mechanism of YY1 in thymocyte development remains unclear though it is essential for iNKT cell development by ChIP-seq analysis (55).

DP-to-SP Transition

DP Survival

Appropriate TCR signaling is crucial for the survival of DP thymocytes and determines positive or negative selection (56). Without proper selective signaling, DP cells will be eliminated by apoptosis within 3~4 days during this pre-selection period.

RORγt is one of the most important survival transcription factors in pre-selective DP cells that activates the gene encoding the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL. It is well-known that the γc cytokine receptor subunit provides critical signals for T cell survival and differentiation. Recently, it is found that RORγt is abundant in immature DP thymocytes and act through Bcl-xL to reduce the surface expression of γc. More importantly, Ligons et al. demonstrate that loss of RORγt in mouse DP thymocytes is associated with increased γc surface abundance and this phenomenon can be restored by forced expression of Bcl-xL in RORγt-deficient thymocytes (57). Moreover, RORγt can be upregulated by TCF-1. Both TCF-1 and RORγt-knockout DP thymocytes undergo similarly accelerated apoptosis, while only in the presence of RORγt, the activation of TCF-1 by stabilized β-catenin can enhance DP thymocyte survival. Specifically, RORγt overexpression could rescue TCF-1 deficient DP thymocytes from apoptosis but overexpressed TCF-1 in RORγt-/- DP thymocytes doesn’t show any rescue, which indicate that RORγt acts downstream of TCF-1. In addition, TCF-1 directly interacts with the promoter region of RORγt and induces its activity (58, 59). According to the most recent studies, TCF-1 may cooperate with transcription factors Zeb family member Zeb1 to participate in the cell cycle and TCR signaling by transcriptomic analysis (60).

Both Bim (Bcl2l11) and Nur77 are TCR-induced proteins with pro-apoptotic function. Bim is important for clonal deletion whereas Nur77 is often dispensable but able to influence late DP thymocytes apoptosis (61, 62).

Interestingly, nuclear speckle-related protein 70 (NSrp70) is selectively expressed on developing thymocytes and highest at DP stage. NSrp70 could regulate cell cycle and survival of thymocytes by governing the alternative processing of various RNA splicing factors, such as oncogenic serine/arginine-rich splicing factor SRSF1 (63). This finding may provide a new angle to dig up larger scale of transcription network in DP survival.

Positive Selection

The DP thymocytes will undergo positive selection in the cortex of the thymus by recognizing antigen-MHC complex presented by cTECs and transducing intra-thymic TCR signals, then become CD4+ or CD8+ expressing SP cells. Calcium flux signaling is required for positive selection of T cells. Our results demonstrate a newly discovered adaptor named Tespa1 (Thymocyte-expressed, positive selection-associated 1) is essential for positive selection by modulating the interaction with a Ca2+ release channel - inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) which express on ER membranes (6466).

The positive selection is also induced by forkhead box (Fox) family. In a way, the pioneer transcription factors Foxa1 and Foxa2 (forkhead box protein A) regulate alternative RNA splicing during thymocyte positive selection. Another Fox protein Foxo1 may induce the selection and maturation of DP thymocytes that can be accelerated in the deficiency of transcription repressor Gfi1(Growth factor independent 1). Thus, the Gfi1-Foxo1 axis shapes the proper generation of SP cells (67, 68). Additionally, Egr-2 also regulates the survival of stage-specific thymocytes and enhanced the maturation of DP cells into SP cells in thymus (46, 69).

Lastly, the achievement of positive selection is inseparable from epigenetic regulation which cross-work with transcriptional signals. HDAC7 (Histone deacetylase 7) has been reported exporting from the cell nucleus during positive selection in mouse thymocytes and modifying genes to mediate the coupling between TCR engagement and downstream events that determine cell survival including MAPK activity (70).

Negative Selection

Negative selection is critical to delete highly self-reactive thymocytes to prevent autoimmunity. The thymocytes who pass the negative selection will become mature T cells with low self-reactivity and export to periphery immune organs.

The proceed of negative selection depends on functional mTECs, whose development is powerfully promoted by transcription factors Foxn1 (forkhead box family N1) and Aire (autoimmune regulator), which control the differentiation and maturation repectively (71). Conditional Foxn1 knockout results in defective negative selection contribute to less clonal deletion of autoreactive thymocytes (72), which possibly attribute to abnormal mTECs. Therefore, the Foxn1-TEC axis has been considered to repair negative selection and rejuvenation of thymic involution which is critical for counteracting inflammaging (73). Foxn1 is also the downstream target of Wnts which are a large family to secret glycoproteins and participate in cell fate determination, migration, proliferation, polarity and death in TECs. Existing evidences show Wnt4 and Wnt5b regulate Foxn1 expression in TECs through TCF-4 and LEF-1 by both autocrine and paracrine manners (74).

On the other hand, the function of mTECs is highly dependent on their characteristic features such as ectopic expression of tissue-restricted antigens (TRAs) and their master regulator Aire, whose expression is restricted to a mature subset of mTECs. Aire induces tissue-specific antigens to ensure negative selection by directly binding the promoter of the target gene within the medulla (75, 76). The transcriptional function of Aire in the process of mTECs adhesion is reconfirmed by CRISPR/Cas9 technology (77). Subsequently, it is shown that Aire targets 5’-URR (5’-untranslated regulatory region) of immune checkpoint HLA-G lead to increased intracellular HLA-G protein expression in TECs (78). Surprisingly, Aire can bind to sequence-independent epigenetic tags, such as unmethylated histone 3, and be recruited to a locus. After demethylation and Aire binding, Aire either directly enhances transcription or recruits other transcriptional activators (75).

In addition to the promoters, the transcriptional repressors of negative selection are indispensable. NCoR1 is a nuclear receptor co-repressor to connect repressive chromatin-modifying enzymes to gene-specific transcription factors. NCoR1 restrains negative selection by repressing pro-apoptotic factor Bim expression, which is expressed elevated in the absence of NCoR1. NCoR1-null thymocytes show excessive negative selection and reduced mature SP thymocytes (7981). NCoR1 interacts with a predominant member of the HDAC family named HDAC3 which is a major and specific molecular switch that is crucial for mTECs differentiation and highly specific to histone deacetylases (82). Capicua (CIC) (83) and Sphingomyelin microdomains (SM) (84) also work as repressive factors together to ensure the proper negative selection and prevent autoimmunity.

Discussion

We conclude the map of T-lymphocyte development in the thymus and related transcriptional regulators that have been reported in the past decade (Figure 1), hoping to give some clues or inspiration to the future research. These selected regulators may have redundant or opposite functions in the thymocyte’s maintenance, proliferation, differentiation and maturation. Indeed, our understanding of the early stage of T lymphocytes development is still limited yet, the modulators we reviewed here are still poorly understood. Surprisingly, in recent years, more and more advanced techniques including various sequencing are invented or improved in order to elucidate the function of transcription factors involved in T cell development. However, the regulatory network among them and the precise mechanism still need further investigation both in vivo and vitro using ingenious animal models and molecular biological approaches.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Transcriptional regulators in thymocyte development. T-lymphocytes go through several distinct stages according to expressed TCRs or surface markers in the thymus. The developing cells will pass checkpoints (β-selection, positive selection and negative selection) to become mature SP thymocytes, then emigrate to the periphery to differentiate to functional subsets. Most of the transcriptional regulators play roles in specific stages via small networks involving signaling in italics. Some interaction between factors remains unclear that displayed in the dotted line. The participants of a few transcriptional factors in grey are also poorly understood.

Author Contributions

XB and YQ prepared the initial draft. LL and MZ revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (82171717 to MZ and 32100712 to YQ).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cosway EJ, James KD, Lucas B, Anderson G, White AJ. The Thymus Medulla and its Control of alphabetaT Cell Development. Semin Immunopathol (2021) 43:15–27. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00830-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lopez-Rodriguez C, Aramburu J, Berga-Bolanos R. Transcription Factors and Target Genes of Pre-TCR Signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci (2015) 72:2305–21. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1864-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gascoigne NR, Rybakin V, Acuto O, Brzostek J. TCR Signal Strength and T Cell Development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol (2016) 32:327–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Fu G, Rybakin V, Brzostek J, Paster W, Acuto O, Gascoigne NR. Fine-Tuning T Cell Receptor Signaling to Control T Cell Development. Trends Immunol (2014) 35:311–8. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Barnett JB. Consequences of Blocking the Choreography of Double Negative Thymocyte Maturation. In: Soboloff J, Kappes DJ, editors. Signaling Mechanisms Regulating T Cell Diversity and Function. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis (2018). p. 1–16. doi: 10.1201/9781315371689-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Perez AR, de Meis J, Rodriguez-Galan MC, Savino W. The Thymus in Chagas Disease: Molecular Interactions Involved in Abnormal T-Cell Migration and Differentiation. Front Immunol (2020) 11:1838. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hosoya T, D'Oliveira Albanus R, Hensley J, Myers G, Kyono Y, Kitzma J, et al. Global Dynamics of Stage-Specific Transcription Factor Binding During Thymocyte Development. Sci Rep (2018) 8:5605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23774-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lavaert M, Liang KL, Vandamme N, Park JE, Roels J, Kowalczyk MS, et al. Integrated scRNA-Seq Identifies Human Postnatal Thymus Seeding Progenitors and Regulatory Dynamics of Differentiating Immature Thymocytes. Immunity (2020) 52:1088–1104 e1086. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Karimi MM, Guo Y, Cui X, Pallikonda HA, Horkova V, Wang YF, et al. The Order and Logic of CD4 Versus CD8 Lineage Choice and Differentiation in Mouse Thymus. Nat Commun (2021) 12:99. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20306-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hosokawa H, Rothenberg EV. How Transcription Factors Drive Choice of the T Cell Fate. Nat Rev Immunol (2021) 21:162–76. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00426-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Garcia-Perez L, Famili F, Cordes M, Brugman M, van Eggermond M, Wu H, et al. Functional Definition of a Transcription Factor Hierarchy Regulating T Cell Lineage Commitment. Sci Adv (2020) 6:1–14. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw7313

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Visan I. Establishing T Cell Lineage Identity. Nat Immunol (2018) 19:316. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0077-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Johnson JL, Georgakilas G, Petrovic J, Kurachi M, Cai S, Harly C, et al. Lineage-Determining Transcription Factor TCF-1 Initiates the Epigenetic Identity of T Cells. Immunity (2018) 48:243–257 e210. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wang F, Qi ZH, Yao YP, Yu GT, Feng T, Zhao TY, et al. Exploring the Stage-Specific Roles of Tcf-1 in T Cell Development and Malignancy at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Mol Immunol (2021) 18:644–59. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00527-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kuznetsov NV, Almuzzaini B, Kritikou JS, Baptista MAP, Oliveira MMS, Keszei M, et al. Nuclear Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Co-Regulates T Cell Factor 1-Mediated Transcription in T Cells. Genome Med (2017) 9:91. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0481-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. De Decker M, Lavaert M, Roels J, Tilleman L, Vandekerckhove B, Leclercq G, et al. HES1 and HES4 Have Non-Redundant Roles Downstream of Notch During Early Human T-Cell Development. Haematologica (2021) 106:130–41. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.226126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hosoya T, Maillard I, Engel JD. From the Cradle to the Grave: Activities of GATA-3 Throughout T-Cell Development and Differentiation. Immunol Rev (2010) 238:110–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00954.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kitagawa K, Shibata K, Matsumoto A, Matsumoto M, Ohhata T, Nakayama KI, et al. Fbw7 Targets GATA3 Through Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2-Dependent Proteolysis and Contributes to Regulation of T-Cell Development. Mol Cell Biol (2014) 34:2732–44. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01549-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Braunstein M, Anderson MK. HEB-Deficient T-Cell Precursors Lose T-Cell Potential and Adopt an Alternative Pathway of Differentiation. Mol Cell Biol (2011) 31:971–82. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01034-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wakabayashi Y, Watanabe H, Inoue J, Takeda N, Sakata J, Mishima Y, et al. Bcl11b is Required for Differentiation and Survival of αβ T Lymphocytes. Nat Immunol (2003) 4:533–9. doi: 10.1038/ni927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Inoue J, Kanefuji T, Okazuka K, Watanabe H, Mishima Y, Kominami R. Expression of TCR Alpha Beta Partly Rescues Developmental Arrest and Apoptosis of Alpha Beta T Cells in Bcl11b-/- Mice. J Immunol (2006) 176:5871–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.5871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Naito T, Tanaka H, Naoe Y, Taniuchi I. Transcriptional Control of T-Cell Development. Int Immunol (2011) 23:661–8. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxr078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Selman WH, Esfandiari E, Filtz TM. Alteration of Bcl11b Upon Stimulation of Both the MAP Kinase- and Gsk3-Dependent Signaling Pathways in Double-Negative Thymocytes. Biochem Cell Biol (2019) 97:201–13. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2018-0132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Treanor LM, Zhou S, Janke L, Churchman ML, Ma Z, Lu T, et al. Interleukin-7 Receptor Mutants Initiate Early T Cell Precursor Leukemia in Murine Thymocyte Progenitors With Multipotent Potential. J Exp Med (2014) 211:701–13. doi: 10.1084/jem.20122727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Mondoon S, Shibata K, Yoshikai Y. In Vivo Blockade of T Cell Development Reveals Alternative Pathways for Generation of Intraepithelial Lymphocytes in Mice. Immunol Lett (2017) 191:40–6. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Klein-Hessling S, Rudolf R, Muhammad K, Knobeloch KP, Maqbool MA, Cauchy P, et al. A Threshold Level of NFATc1 Activity Facilitates Thymocyte Differentiation and Opposes Notch-Driven Leukaemia Development. Nat Commun (2016) 7:11841. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Macian F. Noncanonical NFATc1 Activation in DN Thymocytes. Nat Immunol (2013) 14:116–7. doi: 10.1038/ni.2522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Patra AK, Avots A, Zahedi RP, Schuler T, Sickmann A, Bommhardt U, et al. An Alternative NFAT-Activation Pathway Mediated by IL-7 is Critical for Early Thymocyte Development. Nat Immunol (2013) 14:127–35. doi: 10.1038/ni.2507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Vaillant F, Blyth K, Andrew L, Neil JC, Cameron ER. Enforced Expression of Runx2 Perturbs T Cell Development at a Stage Coincident With Beta-Selection. J Immunol (2002) 169:2866–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.2866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chong MM, Simpson N, Ciofani M, Chen G, Collins A, Littman DR. Epigenetic Propagation of CD4 Expression is Established by the Cd4 Proximal Enhancer in Helper T Cells. Genes Dev (2010) 24:659–69. doi: 10.1101/gad.1901610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Talebian L, Li Z, Guo Y, Gaudet J, Speck ME, Sugiyama D, et al. T-Lymphoid, Megakaryocyte, and Granulocyte Development are Sensitive to Decreases in CBFbeta Dosage. Blood (2007) 109:11–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sahni H, Ross S, Barbarulo A, Solanki A, Lau C, Furmanski A, et al. A Genome Wide Transcriptional Model of the Complex Response to Pre-TCR Signalling During Thymocyte Differentiation. Oncotarget (2015) 6:28646–60. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5796

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Harker N, Garefalaki A, Menzel U, Ktistaki E, Naito T, Georgopoulos K, et al. Pre-TCR Signaling and CD8 Gene Bivalent Chromatin Resolution During Thymocyte Development. J Immunol (2011) 186:6368–77. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Solanki A, Yanez DC, Lau CI, Rowell J, Barbarulo A, Ross S, et al. The Transcriptional Repressor Bcl6 Promotes Pre-TCR-Induced Thymocyte Differentiation and Attenuates Notch1 Activation. Development (2020) 147:dev192203. doi: 10.1242/dev.192203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lauritsen JP, Boding L, Buus TB, Kongsbak M, Levring TB, Rode AK, et al. Fine-Tuning of T-Cell Development by the CD3gamma Di-Leucine-Based TCR-Sorting Motif. Int Immunol (2015) 27:393–404. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Sionov RV, Kfir-Erenfeld S, Spokoini R, Yefenof E. A Role for Bcl-2 in Notch1-Dependent Transcription in Thymic Lymphoma Cells. Adv Hematol (2012) 2012:435241. doi: 10.1155/2012/435241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Boudil A, Matei IR, Shih HY, Bogdanoski G, Yuan JS, Chang SG, et al. IL-7 Coordinates Proliferation, Differentiation and Tcra Recombination During Thymocyte Beta-Selection. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:397–405. doi: 10.1038/ni.3122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Hao B, Krangel MS. Long-Distance Regulation of Fetal Vδ Gene Segment TRDV4 by the Tcrd Enhancer. J Immunol (2011) 187:2484–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Chen L, Carico Z, Shih HY, Krangel MS. A Discrete Chromatin Loop in the Mouse Tcra-Tcrd Locus Shapes the TCRdelta and TCRalpha Repertoires. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:1085–93. doi: 10.1038/ni.3232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Majumder K, Rupp LJ, Yang-Iott KS, Koues OI, Kyle KE, Bassing CH, et al. Domain-Specific and Stage-Intrinsic Changes in Tcrb Conformation During Thymocyte Development. J Immunol (2015) 195:1262–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yuan JS, Tan JB, Visan I, Matei IR, Urbanellis P, Xu K, et al. Lunatic Fringe Prolongs Delta/Notch-Induced Self-Renewal of Committed Alphabeta T-Cell Progenitors. Blood (2011) 117:1184–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-296616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Visan I, Yuan JS, Liu Y, Stanley P, Guidos CJ. Lunatic Fringe Enhances Competition for Delta-Like Notch Ligands But Does Not Overcome Defective Pre-TCR Signaling During Thymocyte Beta-Selection In Vivo. J Immunol (2010) 185:4609–17. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Wang Q, Yan R, Pinnell N, McCarter AC, Oh Y, Liu Y, et al. Stage-Specific Roles for Zmiz1 in Notch-Dependent Steps of Early T-Cell Development. Blood (2018) 132:1279–92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-02-835850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Gerby B, Tremblay CS, Tremblay M, Rojas-Sutterlin S, Herblot S, Hebert J, et al. SCL, LMO1 and Notch1 Reprogram Thymocytes Into Self-Renewing Cells. PloS Genet (2014) 10:e1004768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhang X, Dong X, Wang H, Li J, Yang B, Zhang J, et al. FADD Regulates Thymocyte Development at the Beta-Selection Checkpoint by Modulating Notch Signaling. Cell Death Dis (2014) 5:e1273. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Li S, Symonds AL, Zhu B, Liu M, Raymond MV, Miao T, et al. Early Growth Response Gene-2 (Egr-2) Regulates the Development of B and T Cells. PloS One (2011) 6:e18498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Tiemessen MM, Baert MR, Schonewille T, Brugman MH, Famili F, Salvatori DC, et al. The Nuclear Effector of Wnt-Signaling, Tcf1, Functions as a T-Cell-Specific Tumor Suppressor for Development of Lymphomas. PloS Biol (2012) 10:e1001430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Egawa T, Tillman RE, Naoe Y, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. The Role of the Runx Transcription Factors in Thymocyte Differentiation and in Homeostasis of Naive T Cells. J Exp Med (2007) 204:1945–57. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wong WF, Nakazato M, Watanabe T, Kohu K, Ogata T, Yoshida N, et al. Over-Expression of Runx1 Transcription Factor Impairs the Development of Thymocytes From the Double-Negative to Double-Positive Stages. Immunology (2010) 130:243–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03230.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Cauchy P, Maqbool MA, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Vanhille L, Koch F, Fenouil R, et al. Dynamic Recruitment of Ets1 to Both Nucleosome-Occupied and -Depleted Enhancer Regions Mediates a Transcriptional Program Switch During Early T-Cell Differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res (2016) 44:3567–85. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Mitchell JL, Seng A, Yankee TM. Expression and Splicing of Ikaros Family Members in Murine and Human Thymocytes. Mol Immunol (2017) 87:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.03.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Arenzana TL, Schjerven H, Smale ST. Regulation of Gene Expression Dynamics During Developmental Transitions by the Ikaros Transcription Factor. Genes Dev (2015) 29:1801–16. doi: 10.1101/gad.266999.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Geimer Le Lay AS, Oravecz A, Mastio J, Jung C, Marchal P, Ebel C, et al. The Tumor Suppressor Ikaros Shapes the Repertoire of Notch Target Genes in T Cells. Sci Signal (2014) 7:ra28. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Chen L, Foreman DP, Sant’Angelo DB, Krangel MS. Yin Yang 1 Promotes Thymocyte Survival by Downregulating P53. J Immunol (2016) 196:2572–82. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Ou X, Huo J, Huang Y, Li YF, Xu S, Lam KP. Transcription Factor YY1 is Essential for iNKT Cell Development. Cell Mol Immunol (2019) 16:547–56. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0002-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Overgaard NH, Jung JW, Steptoe RJ, Wells JW. CD4+/CD8+ Double-Positive T Cells: More Than Just a Developmental Stage? J Leukoc Biol (2015) 97:31–8. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1RU0814-382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Ligons DL, Hwang S, Waickman AT, Park JY, Luckey MA, Park JH. RORgammat Limits the Amount of the Cytokine Receptor Gammac Through the Prosurvival Factor Bcl-xL in Developing Thymocytes. Sci Signal (2018) 11:eaam8939. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam8939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wang R, Xie H, Huang Z, Ma J, Fang X, Ding Y, et al. T Cell Factor 1 Regulates Thymocyte Survival via a Rorγt-Dependent Pathway. J Immunol (2011) 187:5964–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Alberola-Ila J, Sharma A, Berga-Bolaños R, Sen JM. T Cell Factor-1 Controls the Lifetime of CD4+ CD8+ Thymocytes In Vivo and Distal T Cell Receptor α-Chain Rearrangement Required for NKT Cell Development. PloS One (2014) 9:e115803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhang J, Wencker M, Marliac Q, Berton A, Hasan U, Schneider R, et al. Zeb1 Represses TCR Signaling, Promotes the Proliferation of T Cell Progenitors and is Essential for NK1.1(+) T Cell Development. Cell Mol Immunol (2021) 18:2140–52. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0459-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Hu QN, Suen AYW, Henao Caviedes LM, Baldwin TA. Nur77 Regulates Nondeletional Mechanisms of Tolerance in T Cells. J Immunol (2017) 199:3147–57. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Stritesky GL, Xing Y, Erickson JR, Kalekar LA, Wang X, Mueller DL, et al. Murine Thymic Selection Quantified Using a Unique Method to Capture Deleted T Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110:4679–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217532110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kim C-H, Park S-M, Lee S-j, Kim Y-D, Jang S-H, Woo S-M, et al. NSrp70 is a Lymphocyte-Essential Splicing Factor That Controls Thymocyte Development. Nucleic Acids Res (2021) 49:5760–78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab389

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Wang D, Zheng M, Lei L, Ji J, Yao Y, Qiu Y, et al. Tespa1 is Involved in Late Thymocyte Development Through the Regulation of TCR-Mediated Signaling. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:560–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.2301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Liang J, Lyu J, Zhao M, Li D, Zheng M, Fang Y, et al. Tespa1 Regulates T Cell Receptor-Induced Calcium Signals by Recruiting Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15732. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Lyu J, Wang P, Xu T, Shen Y, Cui Z, Zheng M, et al. Thymic-Specific Regulation of TCR Signaling by Tespa1. Cell Mol Immunol (2019) 16:897–907. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0259-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Lau CI, Rowell J, Yanez DC, Solanki A, Ross S, Ono M, et al. The Pioneer Transcription Factors Foxa1 and Foxa2 Regulate Alternative RNA Splicing During Thymocyte Positive Selection. Development (2021) 148:dev199754. doi: 10.1242/dev.199754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Shi LZ, Saravia J, Zeng H, Kalupahana NS, Guy CS, Neale G, et al. Gfi1-Foxo1 Axis Controls the Fidelity of Effector Gene Expression and Developmental Maturation of Thymocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2017) 114:E67–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617669114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Lawson VJ, Weston K, Maurice D. Early Growth Response 2 Regulates the Survival of Thymocytes During Positive Selection. Eur J Immunol (2010) 40:232–41. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kasler HG, Young BD, Mottet D, Lim HW, Collins AM, Olson EN, et al. Histone Deacetylase 7 Regulates Cell Survival and TCR Signaling in CD4/CD8 Double-Positive Thymocytes. J Immunol (2011) 186:4782–93. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Michel C, Miller CN, Kuchler R, Brors B, Anderson MS, Kyewski B, et al. Revisiting the Road Map of Medullary Thymic Epithelial Cell Differentiation. J Immunol (2017) 199:3488–503. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Coder BD, Wang H, Ruan L, Su DM. Thymic Involution Perturbs Negative Selection Leading to Autoreactive T Cells That Induce Chronic Inflammation. J Immunol (2015) 194:5825–37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Oh J, Wang W, Thomas R, Su DM. Thymic Rejuvenation via FOXN1-Reprogrammed Embryonic Fibroblasts (FREFs) to Counteract Age-Related Inflammation. JCI Insight (2020) 5:e140313. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140313

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Sun L, Luo H, Li H, Zhao Y. Thymic Epithelial Cell Development and Differentiation: Cellular and Molecular Regulation. Protein Cell (2013) 4:342–55. doi: 10.1007/s13238-013-3014-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Danso-Abeam D, Humblet-Baron S, Dooley J, Liston A. Models of Aire-Dependent Gene Regulation for Thymic Negative Selection. Front Immunol (2011) 2:14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Yamaguchi Y, Takayanagi A, Chen J, Sakai K, Kudoh J, Shimizu N. Mouse Thymic Epithelial Cell Lines Expressing "Aire" and Peripheral Tissue-Specific Antigens Reproduce In Vitro Negative Selection of T Cells. Exp Cell Res (2011) 317:2019–30. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Speck-Hernandez CA, Assis AF, Felicio RF, Cotrim-Sousa L, Pezzi N, Lopes GS, et al. Aire Disruption Influences the Medullary Thymic Epithelial Cell Transcriptome and Interaction With Thymocytes. Front Immunol (2018) 9:964. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Melo-Lima BL, Poras I, Passos GA, Carosella ED, Donadi EA, Moreau P. The Autoimmune Regulator (Aire) Transactivates HLA-G Gene Expression in Thymic Epithelial Cells. Immunology (2019) 158:121–35. doi: 10.1111/imm.13099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Wang J, He N, Zhang N, Quan D, Zhang S, Zhang C, et al. NCoR1 Restrains Thymic Negative Selection by Repressing Bim Expression to Spare Thymocytes Undergoing Positive Selection. Nat Commun (2017) 8:959. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00931-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Muller L, Hainberger D, Stolz V, Hamminger P, Hassan H, Preglej T, et al. The Corepressor NCOR1 Regulates the Survival of Single-Positive Thymocytes. Sci Rep (2017) 7:15928. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15918-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Muller L, Hainberger D, Stolz V, Ellmeier W. NCOR1-A New Player on the Field of T Cell Development. J Leukoc Biol (2018) 104:1061–8. doi: 10.1002/JLB.1RI0418-168R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Goldfarb Y, Kadouri N, Levi B, Sela A, Herzig Y, Cohen RN, et al. HDAC3 Is a Master Regulator of mTEC Development. Cell Rep (2016) 15:651–65. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Park GY, Park JS, Park J, Hong HYL. Regulation of Positive and Negative Selection and TCR Signaling During Thymic T Cell Development by Capicua. Elife (2021) 10:e71769. doi: 10.1101/2021.07.11.451936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Toshima K, Nagafuku M, Okazaki T, Kobayashi T, Inokuchi JI. Plasma Membrane Sphingomyelin Modulates Thymocyte Development by Inhibiting TCR-Induced Apoptosis. Int Immunol (2019) 31:211–23. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxy082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: transcriptional regulators, T-lymphocytes, double negative (DN) cells, double positive (DP) cells, single positive (SP) cells, T cell receptor (TCR)

Citation: Bao X, Qin Y, Lu L and Zheng M (2022) Transcriptional Regulation of Early T-Lymphocyte Development in Thymus. Front. Immunol. 13:884569. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.884569

Received: 26 February 2022; Accepted: 09 March 2022;
Published: 31 March 2022.

Edited by:

Bin Zhao, Central South University, China

Reviewed by:

Guo Fu, Xiamen University, China

Copyright © 2022 Bao, Qin, Lu and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Linrong Lu, bHVfbGlucm9uZ0B6anUuZWR1LmNu; Mingzhu Zheng, emhlbmdtekBzZXUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.