Networks of CD8+ T Cell Response Activation in Melanoma and Vitiligo

Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer derived from melanocyte, which shows high response rate to cancer immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin disease resulting from the destruction of melanocytes by autoreactive CD8⁺ T cells. Vitiligo induced by cancer immunotherapy is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with melanoma, and growing evidence supports the fact that melanocyte/melanoma-shared antigen (MSA)-specific CD8⁺ T cells infiltrated in the tumor (melanoma) and skin (vitiligo) microenvironment play pivotal roles in the prognosis of both diseases. Thus, cellular communications that promote MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells recruitment, proliferation, and effector functions are now seen as key targets to enhance the efficacy of current therapies for both diseases. Here, we discussed recent advancements in illustrating immune signaling pathways and immune cell types that regulate migration, proliferation, and function of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells in melanoma and vitiligo; and future immunotherapeutic approaches that may enhance clinical outcomes of both diseases.

Introduction

Melanoma is a highly aggressive skin cancer that is particularly immunogenic, evident by its ability to undergo spontaneous and cancer immunotherapy-induced regression. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as the anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab) has improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, 5-year overall survival rate for patients with stage IV melanoma is limited to 40% of patients (1). Thus, new treatments with the ability to enhance the efficacy and durability of current cancer immunotherapies are needed.

Vitiligo is caused by the destruction of melanocytes by CD8⁺ T cells and can be induced by administering ICIs (also called vitiligo-like depigmentation) to patients with melanoma. Vitiligo and antitumor responses in melanoma reportedly depend on CD8⁺ T cells that recognize identical antigens, so-called melanocyte/melanoma-shared antigens (MSA), including Melan-A, tyrosinase, and premelanosome (PMEL), and can reduce melanoma mass and prevent tumor recurrence (2). Indeed, vitiligo induced by immunotherapy is strongly associated with response to ICI therapy and patient survival (3). These results suggest that MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses promote vitiligo progression and can suppress melanoma progression and vice versa.

Several studies have demonstrated that the vitiligo disease activity and prognosis of cancer immunotherapy for melanoma correlate with the number and effector function of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the skin and melanoma, respectively (4–7). Furthermore, infiltration and proliferation of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells are associated with the number of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells. These factors and the effector function of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells are regulated by cellular communications in the skin and melanoma microenvironment. Thus, understanding networks of CD8⁺ T cell response provides opportunities for a new treatment strategy for vitiligo and melanoma.

MSA-Specific Cd8⁺ T Cell Recruitment in Melanoma and Vitiligo

ICIs have limited efficacy for patients who have insufficient tumor antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cell infiltration of their tumor, a characteristic known as “cold tumor” (8). In contrast, a melanoma infiltrated by a large number of MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells, referred to as a “hot tumor,” responds well to ICIs. Thus, converting “cold tumor” to “hot tumor” by inducing MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell infiltration would provide a valuable adjunctive therapy to improve ICIs efficacy.

Translational research using hot tumors revealed that the spontaneous MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell infiltration into tumors is facilitated by the recognition of tumor-derived DNA by the cytosolic cGAS-STING signaling pathway in tumor-infiltrating conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1 TIDCs) (9–11). This leads to type I interferon (IFN) production by cDC1 TIDCs and promotes their migration to the tumor-draining lymph node, thereby priming MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells and promoting their migration to the tumor via CXCL10 (11). In this setting, STING agonists are now being injected intratumorally in clinical trials to increase the efficacy of anti-PD-1 Ab treatment in patients with advanced melanoma (12, 13). However, 48% of cold tumor-type melanoma have aberrant activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling and lack cDC1 TIDCs (14). Therefore STING agonists, which stimulate the function of cDC1 TIDC, may not be effective in cold tumor-type melanoma. Thus, a treatment strategy that activates the STING-type I IFN pathway and increases cDC1 TIDCs would be optimal for combined therapy with ICIs.

Studies of human melanoma and melanoma mouse model revealed that NK cells contribute to the recruitment of cDC1 DCs into tumors, through the production of FLT3L, CCL5, and XCL1 (15, 16). In addition, the melanoma mouse model demonstrated that mobilization of cDC1 alone is insufficient in generating anti-tumor T cell response in tumors and that addition of the TLR3 agonist, which activates type I IFN signaling in cDC1, is necessary to enhance response to anti-PD-1 Ab (17). A randomized clinical trial that conducted FLT3L pre-treatment enhancement of responses to the DC vaccine in combination with the TLR3 agonist for metastatic melanoma found that the addition of FLT3L increased peripheral cDC1, cDC2, and plasmacytoid DCs. Furthermore, the increase of humoral and T-cell responses and activation of DCs, NK cells, and T cells was observed (18). These results suggest that anti-PD-1 Ab in combination with FLT3L and TLR3 agonist might be an effective treatment for cold tumor-type melanoma (19).

Similar to the STING signaling pathway, which is absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) is a cytosolic double-stranded DNA sensor, activated by cytosolic DNA. AIM2 signaling leads to the production of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, eliciting a form of cell death called pyroptosis. Additionally, we found that DC expression of AIM2 within human melanoma correlates with poor prognosis, and AIM2 exerts an immunosuppressive effect within the melanoma (20). Therefore, vaccination with AIM2-deficient DCs improves the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy and anti-PD-1 Ab for “cold tumors.” This effect depends on STING activation and IFN-β production, leading to CXCL10-mediated recruitment of T cells into the tumor. Additionally, regulatory T cell (Treg) tumor infiltration was reduced, which was due to the loss of AIM2-dependent production of IL-1β and IL-18. These results suggest that Aim2-deficient DC vaccination not only enhances immune responses to the tumor by activating STING, but also modulates IL-1β and IL-18 production, resulting in synergistic therapeutic responses. Thus, anti-PD-1 Ab in combination with Aim2-suppressed DC vaccine (intravenous or intra-tumoral injection) or Aim2 siRNA (intra-tumoral injection) will be a new treatment strategy for melanoma.

Gene expression analysis of both human vitiligo skin and vitiligo mouse model skin revealed the upregulation of IFN-γ-specific signature, including chemokines CXCL10 and CXCL9, and their receptor CXCR3, which is expressed on T cells (21). In the vitiligo mouse model, blockade of IFN-γ, IFNGR (receptor of IFN-γ), JAK1/2 (downstream intracellular signal transducer of IFNGR), CXCL10, and CXCR3 suppressed the MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell skin infiltration, thereby not only preventing vitiligo progression but also reversing vitiligo, indicating that the IFN-γ-chemokine axis is a potential therapeutic target (22). Functional studies in the CXCL10 reporter vitiligo model mice and single-cell RNA sequence of the human vitiligo skin revealed that antigen-presenting cells, including DCs and macrophages, upregulated CXCL10 to the greatest extent on a per-cell basis, which was similar to melanoma (4, 11, 23). However, since keratinocytes are abundant in the skin, they produced the bulk of CXCL10, and were predominantly responsible for MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell recruitment in vitiligo. These results indicated that targeting IFN-γ signaling in keratinocytes, which can be done by topical treatment, could be effective for treating vitiligo.

The Role of IFN-γ Signaling and JAK Inhibitor in Melanoma and Vitiligo

Given that IFN-γ-JAK1/2-CXCL10 signaling in keratinocytes plays a major role in MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cell recruitment in vitiligo, the efficacy of a topical JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib cream, was evaluated by a prospective randomized phase 2 trial (24). After 24 weeks of treatment, those who received ruxolitinib cream at 1.5% twice daily showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving a 50% or higher improvement from baseline in the facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50) than those receiving placebo (45% vs. 3%, p = 0.0001). These results suggest that topical JAK inhibitors might be new effective treatment for vitiligo, and phase 2 or 3 studies of several topical JAK inhibitors are ongoing based on these results (25).

In cancer, IFN-γ is known to promote tumor-antigen specific CD8⁺ T cell responses by upregulating the MHC class I on tumor cells, thereby increasing their antigen recognition (26). However, at the same time in the tumor microenvironment, where the persistence of antigen and inflammation occurs, IFN-γ can upregulate immune checkpoint ligands, such as PD-L1 on cancer cells that leads CD8⁺ T cells to enter a state called “T cell exhaustion.” Exhausted CD8⁺ T cells increase the expression of immune checkpoint receptors, such as PD-1, LAG3, and TIM3, as well as loss of cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, production in a hierarchical manner and lose their effector function by time (27). Based on this notion, a study demonstrated that anti-PD-1 Ab lose their efficacy over time because of the expression of other immune checkpoint receptors like TIM-3 (28). This suggests that inhibiting multiple immune checkpoint receptors would be required for durable, long-term responses in ICIs.

Recently, the single-cell RNA-seq analysis of melanoma demonstrated that expression of the IFN-γ hallmark gene set (IFNG.GS) is predominantly expressed in T cells, NK cells, and macrophages, whereas IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) resistance signature (ISG.RS) is predominantly expressed in melanoma cells (29, 30). Furthermore, functional assays using mice with melanoma that are resistant to anti-CTLA-4 Ab plus radiation therapy revealed that inhibition of tumor IFN-γ signaling decreases ISGs in cancer cells, while it increases the number and IFN-γ production of CD8⁺ T cells and activates NK cells in melanoma. Thus, ISGs expressed by cancer and immune cells oppose each other, and IFNG.GS (immune cell)/ISG.RS (cancer cell) ratio correlates with the response of ICIs (30, 31). Furthermore, delayed administration of the JAK inhibitor after starting the anti-CTLA-4 Ab improved its antitumor response by decreasing expression of multiple immune checkpoint ligands on melanoma cells. In contrast, co-administration of the JAK inhibitor and the anti-CTLA-4 Ab did not improve antitumor response compared to anti-CTLA-4 Ab monotherapy (31). Therefore, these results suggest that ICI lead-in before JAK inhibitor combination extends the response of ICI in melanoma.

PD-1/PD-L1 in Melanoma and Vitiligo

Melanoma can be classified into four groups by PD-L1 expression on melanoma cells and the presence or absence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Among the four groups, 38% of melanoma express PD-L1 and exhibit TIL infiltration, and this type of melanoma is most likely to respond to the anti-PD-1 Ab since many CD8⁺ TILs in this melanoma express PD-1 and are in an exhausted T cell state (32). PD-1/PD-L1 ligation suppresses the proliferation and effector function of CD8⁺ TILs (33), and anti-PD-1 Ab could partially reinvigorate the antitumor immune response of MSA-specific CD8⁺ TILs by upregulating the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α, thereby increasing its proliferation rate (34, 35). However, approximately 25% of patients with melanoma treated with the anti-PD-1 Ab relapse after long-standing objective response by acquired resistance (36). Whole-exome sequencing of human melanoma tissues and the human melanoma cell line revealed that acquired resistance can result from loss-of-function mutations of IFNGR1, IFNGR2, JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, and IRF3 from the IFN-γ signaling pathway and β2M from antigen presentation pathway (37, 38). Since the IFN-γ signaling pathway in melanoma cells induces tumor growth arrest and death, mutations of IFNGR1, IFNGR2, JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, and IRF3 lead to insensitivity to anti-tumor IFN-γ activity (37, 38). In addition, JAK1 mutants are insensitive to type I IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β), since JAK1 plays a role in downstream signaling of both type I and II IFN receptors (39). Furthermore, functional studies of human melanoma cell lines and tissues revealed that the IFN-γ-IFNGR1/2-JAK1/JAK2-STAT1/STAT2/STAT3-IRF1 axis promotes PD-L1 expression (40). Thus, mutations of the IFN-γ signaling pathway in melanoma cells lead to downregulation of PD-L1, thereby evolving into CD8⁺ T cell resistant-PD-L1 negative lesions. In contrast, β2M mutants are sensitive to IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-γ on cell growth inhibition and PD-L1 expression but lose MHC class I expression, thereby impairing antigen presentation (39). Moreover, it was demonstrated that melanoma with JAK1/2 mutants also block MHC class I upregulation by IFN-γ, similar to that of β2M mutants (38, 39). Thus, melanoma escapes antitumor immune response of anti PD-1 Ab by altering IFN signaling and/or the antigen presentation machinery.

Recent studies using the melanoma mouse model demonstrated that JAK1/2 knockout resistance could be overcome with anti-PD-1 Ab in combination with the TLR9 agonist, which activates TLR9-type IFN signaling, thereby increasing infiltration of T cells and NK cells in the tumor (39). β2M knockout resistance was able to overcome by anti-PD-1 Ab in combination with bempegaldesleukin (CD122 preferential IL-2 agonist) by activating cytotoxicity of NK cells and CD4⁺ TILs (39). Based on these results, clinical trials evaluating the TLR9 agonist or CD122 preferential IL-2 agonist in combination with anti-PD-1 Ab, for melanoma, are now ongoing (41, 42).

In contrast to melanoma, immunohistochemical analysis of human vitiligo tissues and in vitro experiments using human melanocytes showed that melanocytes derived from non-lesional vitiligo skin showed no PD-L1 upregulation upon IFN-γ exposure, while other skin cells displayed significant PD-L1 expression after exposure (43). These results suggest that melanocytes in vitiligo have low protection against MSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells and that manipulating PD-1/PD-L1 signaling might have therapeutic potential in vitiligo. In corroboration with the hypothesis, a report demonstrated that i.p. injection of PD-L1 fusion protein reversed hair depigmentation via increased Tregs in PMEL mouse, whose CD8⁺ T cells are all specific for PMEL and spontaneously developed hair depigmentation by perifollicular infiltration of PMEL-specific CD8⁺ T cells (44). Based on these findings, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be effective as a treatment strategy for vitiligo.

Survival Of MSA-Specific Cd8⁺ T Cell In Melanoma And Vitiligo

Although vitiligo is reversible by treatment, 40% of the patients experience relapse within the first year after treatment stops (45). Vitiligo typically recurs at the same location, indicating that MSA-specific memory CD8⁺ persists in the skin and permits disease reactivation after treatment terminates. Indeed, several groups reported that MSA-specific memory CD8⁺ T cells are highly enriched in the vitiligo lesion compared to blood, and the majority of these cells expressed CD69 and CD103, which are both markers of skin resident memory T cells (T_RM) (46–48). Furthermore, T_RM cells in vitiligo was reported to express CD49a and CD49a⁺ CD8⁺ T_RM cells upregulate cytotoxic molecules, such as IFN-γ, perforin, and granzyme B when exposed to IL-15 (49). Reports demonstrated that IL-15 signaling mediates proliferation and survival of CD8⁺ T_RM, and the number of CD8⁺ T_RM in the epidermis significantly reduced in IL-15-deficient mice compared to wild-type mice (50). Collectively, these results suggest that MSA-specific CD8⁺ T_RM is responsible for vitiligo homeostasis and IL-15 signaling is a potential therapeutic target.

The IL-15 receptor is composed of CD122 (which can be shared by the IL-2 receptor when paired with CD25), CD215, and CD132 (the common γ chain) and form a trimeric receptor (51). In vitiligo lesions, CD122 and CD132 are expressed on MSA-specific CD8⁺ T_RM, whereas CD215 is expressed on keratinocytes with an ability to present IL-15 to T cells in trans (48). Based on this notion, a study using the vitiligo mouse model demonstrated that anti-CD122 Ab depletes CD8⁺ T_RM from vitiligo, thereby achieving durable repigmentation when administered either systemically or locally in the skin. Notably, both human and mouse MSA-specific CD8⁺ T_RM in vitiligo lesion showed higher expression of CD122 on a per cell basis and a higher proportion of CD122 expressing MSA-specific CD8⁺ T_RM compared to host CD8⁺ T_RM, suggesting that targeting CD122 preferentially affects autoreactive T cells while leaving most endogenous T cell populations intact (48). Since systemic JAK inhibitors did not deplete MSA-specific CD8⁺ T_RM in the vitiligo mouse model (52), the anti-CD122 Ab could be a more durable and safer treatment strategy for vitiligo.

In contrast to T_RM, recirculating central memory T cells (T_CM) can migrate back and forth through circulation to tissues, such as the skin. T_CM expresses sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor; thus, FTY720, a S1P receptor modulator prevents T_CM to egress from lymph nodes, thereby inhibiting T_CM recruitment to the skin. Interestingly, FTY720 treatment achieved repigmentation in a vitiligo mouse model. These results indicated that CD8⁺ T_RM cooperates with CD8⁺ T_CM to maintain vitiligo lesions, and the S1P1 modulator can be a new treatment strategy for vitiligo (53).

Like vitiligo, the role of CD8⁺ T_RM and CD8⁺ T_CM in melanoma has been investigated by many reports. Treating a melanoma-expressing OVA-bearing mouse by i.p. vaccination of recombinant vaccinia virus expressing OVA (rVACV-OVA) to generate CD8⁺ T_RM and CD8⁺ T_CM, or only CD8⁺ T_RM by i.p. vaccination of rVACV-OVA with i.p. injection of FTY720, it was shown that both CD8⁺ T_RM and CD8⁺ T_CM infiltrated in melanoma are sufficient to mediate anti-tumor immunity, and they can synergize with each other (54). Another study revealed that approximately 40% of mice transplanted with melanoma in the epidermis remained free of macroscopic skin lesions for more than five months; however, intravital imaging revealed that these mice frequently harbored melanoma cells, and these cells were dynamically surveyed by CD8⁺ T_RM. Depletion CD8⁺ T_RM triggered tumor outgrowth in a proportion (~20%) of mice with occult melanomas. These results suggest that CD8⁺ T_RM promotes a durable melanoma–immune equilibrium and suppresses melanoma progression (55).

Since CD8⁺ T_RM proliferation depends on IL-15 signaling, bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214), an engineered IL-2 cytokine prodrug that provides sustained activation of the IL-2 pathway with a bias to the CD122, which works as a CD122 agonist, can promote proliferation of CD8+ T_RM. Functional assay using the melanoma mouse model and the human melanoma tissues revealed that NKTR-214 expands, maintaining effector CD8⁺ T cells and depleting Tregs by effector CD8⁺ T cell-derived IFN-γ and TNF-α (39, 56). This CD122 agonist is now being injected intravenously in clinical trials to increase the efficacy of anti-PD-1 Ab treatment in patients with advanced melanoma and showing promising results (42).

Conclusion

Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer with a poor prognosis. Since, durable responses to cancer immunotherapies are limited to 40% of patients, improving clinical outcomes is imperative. Translational research to date has provided an insight into the networks that activate CD8⁺ T cell immune response in melanoma, providing a potential treatment strategy that enhance anti-tumor immunity of anti-PD-1 Ab, such as STING agonist, AIM2 siRNA, and combination therapy of FLT3L and TLR3 agonist that target TIDCs, JAK inhibitor for exhausted CD8⁺ T cells, and CD122 agonist for CD8+ TRM and NK cells in tumor (Table 1). Since melanoma and vitiligo are in a ying–yang relationship, opposite treatments to melanoma, such as anti-CD122 Ab and PD-L1 fusion protein are now focused as a new treatment strategy for vitiligo (Table 1). However, JAK inhibitor was both beneficial to both melanoma and vitiligo. Seemingly, these slight differences in cellular communications and responses in melanoma and vitiligo are partially attributable to the ratio of melanoma cells to immune cells is much higher than the ratio of melanocyte to immune cells in vitiligo (Figures 1A, B). However, it should still be noted understanding multiple aspects of CD8+ T cell immune response involved in melanoma and vitiligo would lead to better treatments and contribute toward a better prognosis in both diseases.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Future Approaches for Targeting CD8+ T cell Immune Response in Melanoma and Vitiligo.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Signaling pathways involved in CD8⁺ T cell response activation and future therapeutic approaches in melanoma (A) and vitiligo (B). (A) The interaction of (i) CD8⁺ T cell (CD8⁺ T_RM and recirculating CD8⁺ T_CM) with cDC1 and plasmacytoid DC through type I IFN-CXCL10 signaling (ii) NK cell with cDC1 through FLT3, CCL5, and XCL1. (B) The interaction of CD8⁺ T cell (CD8⁺ T_RM and recirculating CD8⁺ T_CM) with keratinocytes through IFN-γ-JAK signaling and IL-15 (CD122) signaling.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grants 21K08356 (to KF) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Conflict of Interest

KF has filed a patent that covers AIM2 siRNAs and their use to treat melanoma.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Betof Warner A, Palmer JS, Shoushtari AN, Goldman DA, Panageas KS, Hayes SA, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Responses to Retreatment in Patients With Melanoma Treated With PD-1 Blockade. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38(15):1655–63. doi: 10.1200/jco.19.01464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Teulings HE, Limpens J, Jansen SN, Zwinderman AH, Reitsma JB, Spuls PI, et al. Vitiligo-Like Depigmentation in Patients With Stage III-IV Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy and its Association With Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33(7):773–81. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.4756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tang K, Seo J, Tiu BC, Le TK, Pahalyants V, Raval NS, et al. Association of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events With Increased Survival in Patients Treated With Anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 and Anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Therapy. JAMA Dermatol (2022) 158(2):189–93. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.5476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Richmond JM, Bangari DS, Essien KI, Currimbhoy SD, Groom JR, Pandya AG, et al. Keratinocyte-Derived Chemokines Orchestrate T-Cell Positioning in the Epidermis During Vitiligo and May Serve as Biomarkers of Disease. J Invest Dermatol (2017) 137(2):350–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.09.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Strassner JP, Rashighi M, Refat MA, Richmond JM, Harris JE. Suction Blistering the Lesional Skin of Vitiligo Patients Reveals Useful Biomarkers of Disease Activity. J Am Acad Dermatol (2017) 76(5):847–55.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Larsabal M, Marti A, Jacquemin C, Rambert J, Thiolat D, Dousset L, et al. Vitiligo-Like Lesions Occurring in Patients Receiving Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 Therapies are Clinically and Biologically Distinct From Vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol (2017) 76(5):863–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Fukuda K, Harris JE. Vitiligo-Like Depigmentation in Patients Receiving Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Reflects Active Vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol (2018) 78(1):e15–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 Blockade Induces Responses by Inhibiting Adaptive Immune Resistance. Nature (2014) 515(7528):568–71. doi: 10.1038/nature13954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Deng L, Liang H, Xu M, Yang X, Burnette B, Arina A, et al. STING-Dependent Cytosolic DNA Sensing Promotes Radiation-Induced Type I Interferon-Dependent Antitumor Immunity in Immunogenic Tumors. Immunity (2014) 41(5):843–52. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Woo SR, Fuertes MB, Corrales L, Spranger S, Furdyna MJ, Leung MY, et al. STING-Dependent Cytosolic DNA Sensing Mediates Innate Immune Recognition of Immunogenic Tumors. Immunity (2014) 41(5):830–42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Spranger S, Dai D, Horton B, Gajewski TF. Tumor-Residing Batf3 Dendritic Cells Are Required for Effector T Cell Trafficking and Adoptive T Cell Therapy. Cancer Cell (2017) 31(5):711–23.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li K, Qu S, Chen X, Wu Q, Shi M. Promising Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy: TLRs, RLRs, and STING-Mediated Innate Immune Pathways. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18(2):404. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020404

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Gajewski TF, Higgs EF. Immunotherapy With a Sting. Science (2020) 369(6506):921–2. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6622

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Spranger S, Bao R, Gajewski TF. Melanoma-Intrinsic β-Catenin Signalling Prevents Anti-Tumour Immunity. Nature (2015) 523(7559):231–5. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Barry KC, Hsu J, Broz ML, Cueto FJ, Binnewies M, Combes AJ, et al. A Natural Killer-Dendritic Cell Axis Defines Checkpoint Therapy-Responsive Tumor Microenvironments. Nat Med (2018) 24(8):1178–91. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0085-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Böttcher JP, Bonavita E, Chakravarty P, Blees H, Cabeza-Cabrerizo M, Sammicheli S, et al. NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of Cdc1 Into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell (2018) 172(5):1022–37.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Salmon H, Idoyaga J, Rahman A, Leboeuf M, Remark R, Jordan S, et al. Expansion and Activation of CD103(+) Dendritic Cell Progenitors at the Tumor Site Enhances Tumor Responses to Therapeutic PD-L1 and BRAF Inhibition. Immunity (2016) 44(4):924–38. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Bhardwaj N, Friedlander PA, Pavlick AC, Ernstoff MS, Gastman BR, Hanks BA, et al. Flt3 Ligand Augments Immune Responses to Anti-DEC-205-NY-ESO-1 Vaccine Through Expansion of Dendritic Cell Subsets. Nat Cancer (2020) 1(12):1204–17. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00143-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Saxena M, van der Burg SH, Melief CJM, Bhardwaj N. Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines. Nat Rev Cancer (2021) 21(6):360–78. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00346-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Fukuda K, Okamura K, Riding RL, Fan X, Afshari K, Haddadi NS, et al. AIM2 Regulates Anti-Tumor Immunity and is a Viable Therapeutic Target for Melanoma. J Exp Med (2021) 218(9):e20200962. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rashighi M, Agarwal P, Richmond JM, Harris TH, Dresser K, Su MW, et al. CXCL10 is Critical for the Progression and Maintenance of Depigmentation in a Mouse Model of Vitiligo. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6:223ra23. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Frisoli ML, Harris JE. Vitiligo: Mechanistic Insights Lead to Novel Treatments. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2017) 140:654–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Gellatly KJ, Strassner JP, Essien K, Refat MA, Murphy RL, Coffin-Schmitt A, et al. scRNA-Seq of Human Vitiligo Reveals Complex Networks of Subclinical Immune Activation and a Role for CCR5 in T(reg) Function. Sci Transl Med (2021) 13(610):eabd8995. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd8995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Rosmarin D, Pandya AG, Lebwohl M, Grimes P, Hamzavi I, Gottlieb AB, et al. Ruxolitinib Cream for Treatment of Vitiligo: A Randomised, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet (2020) 396(10244):110–20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30609-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Qi F, Liu F, Gao L. Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Vitiligo: A Review. Front Immunol (2021) 12:790125. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.790125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pfirschke C, Engblom C, Rickelt S, Cortez-Retamozo V, Garris C, Pucci F, et al. Immunogenic Chemotherapy Sensitizes Tumors to Checkpoint Blockade Therapy. Immunity (2016) 44(2):343–54. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and Cellular Insights Into T Cell Exhaustion. Nat Rev Immunol (2015) 15(8):486–99. doi: 10.1038/nri3862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Koyama S, Akbay EA, Li YY, Herter-Sprie GS, Buczkowski KA, Richards WG, et al. Adaptive Resistance to Therapeutic PD-1 Blockade is Associated With Upregulation of Alternative Immune Checkpoints. Nat Commun (2016) 7:10501. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Treacy D, Trombetta JJ, et al. Dissecting the Multicellular Ecosystem of Metastatic Melanoma by Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Science (2016) 352(6282):189–96. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Benci JL, Johnson LR, Choa R, Xu Y, Qiu J, Zhou Z, et al. Opposing Functions of Interferon Coordinate Adaptive and Innate Immune Responses to Cancer Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cell (2019) 178(4):933–48.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Benci JL, Xu B, Qiu Y, Wu TJ, Dada H, Twyman-Saint Victor C, et al. Tumor Interferon Signaling Regulates a Multigenic Resistance Program to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cell (2016) 167(6):1540–54.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ. Classifying Cancers Based on T-Cell Infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res (2015) 75(11):2139–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-15-0255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, et al. Tumor-Associated B7-H1 Promotes T-Cell Apoptosis: A Potential Mechanism of Immune Evasion. Nat Med (2002) 8(8):793–800. doi: 10.1038/nm730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 Ligands, and Other Features of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment With Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 20(19):5064–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-13-3271

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Huang AC, Orlowski RJ, Xu X, Mick R, George SM, Yan PK, et al. A Single Dose of Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Resectable Melanoma. Nat Med (2019) 25(3):454–61. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0357-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ribas A, Hamid O, Daud A, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Kefford R, et al. Association of Pembrolizumab With Tumor Response and Survival Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma. Jama (2016) 315(15):1600–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zaretsky JM, Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, Escuin-Ordinas H, Hugo W, Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Mutations Associated With Acquired Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Melanoma. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(9):819–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sucker A, Zhao F, Pieper N, Heeke C, Maltaner R, Stadtler N, et al. Acquired Ifnγ Resistance Impairs Anti-Tumor Immunity and Gives Rise to T-Cell-Resistant Melanoma Lesions. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15440. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Torrejon DY, Abril-Rodriguez G, Champhekar AS, Tsoi J, Campbell KM, Kalbasi A, et al. Overcoming Genetically Based Resistance Mechanisms to PD-1 Blockade. Cancer Discovery (2020) 10(8):1140–57. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-19-1409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, Moreno BH, Saco J, Escuin-Ordinas H, Rodriguez GA, et al. Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression. Cell Rep (2017) 19(6):1189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ribas A, Medina T, Kirkwood JM, Zakharia Y, Gonzalez R, Davar D, et al. Overcoming PD-1 Blockade Resistance With CpG-A Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Vidutolimod in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. Cancer Discovery (2021) 11(12):2998–3007. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-21-04

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Diab A, Tykodi SS, Daniels GA, Maio M, Curti BD, Lewis KD, et al. Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab in First-Line Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39(26):2914–25. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.00675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Willemsen M, Krebbers G, Tjin EPM, Willemsen KJ, Louis A, Konijn VAL, et al. IFN-γ-Induced PD-L1 Expression on Human Melanocytes is Impaired in Vitiligo. Exp Dermatol (2021). doi: 10.1111/exd.14500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Miao X, Xu R, Fan B, Chen J, Li X, Mao W, et al. PD-L1 Reverses Depigmentation in Pmel-1 Vitiligo Mice by Increasing the Abundance of Tregs in the Skin. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):1605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19407-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Cavalié M, Ezzedine K, Fontas E, Montaudié H, Castela E, Bahadoran P, et al. Maintenance Therapy of Adult Vitiligo With 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Invest Dermatol (2015) 135(4):970–4. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Malik BT, Byrne KT, Vella JL, Zhang P, Shabaneh TB, Steinberg SM, et al. Resident Memory T Cells in the Skin Mediate Durable Immunity to Melanoma. Sci Immunol (2017) 2(10):eaam6346. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aam6346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Boniface K, Jacquemin C, Darrigade AS, Dessarthe B, Martins C, Boukhedouni N, et al. Vitiligo Skin Is Imprinted With Resident Memory CD8 T Cells Expressing Cxcr3. J Invest Dermatol (2018) 138(2):355–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.08.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Zapata L Jr., Garg M, Riding RL, Refat MA, et al. Antibody Blockade of IL-15 Signaling has the Potential to Durably Reverse Vitiligo. Sci Transl Med (2018) 10(450):eaam7710. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Cheuk S, Schlums H, Gallais Sérézal I, Martini E, Chiang SC, Marquardt N, et al. CD49a Expression Defines Tissue-Resident CD8(+) T Cells Poised for Cytotoxic Function in Human Skin. Immunity (2017) 46(2):287–300. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Adachi T, Kobayashi T, Sugihara E, Yamada T, Ikuta K, Pittaluga S, et al. Hair Follicle-Derived IL-7 and IL-15 Mediate Skin-Resident Memory T Cell Homeostasis and Lymphoma. Nat Med (2015) 21(11):1272–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. Interleukin 15: Biology and Relevance to Human Disease. Blood (2001) 97(1):14–32. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Azzolino V, Zapata L Jr., Garg M, Gjoni M, Riding RL, Strassner JP, et al. Jak Inhibitors Reverse Vitiligo in Mice But Do Not Deplete Skin Resident Memory T Cells. J Invest Dermatol (2021) 141(1):182–4.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.04.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Rashighi M, Agarwal P, Garg M, Essien KI, et al. Resident Memory and Recirculating Memory T Cells Cooperate to Maintain Disease in a Mouse Model of Vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol (2019) 139(4):769–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Enamorado M, Iborra S, Priego E, Cueto FJ, Quintana JA, Martínez-Cano S, et al. Enhanced Anti-Tumour Immunity Requires the Interplay Between Resident and Circulating Memory CD8(+) T Cells. Nat Commun (2017) 8:16073. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Park SL, Buzzai A, Rautela J, Hor JL, Hochheiser K, Effern M, et al. Tissue-Resident Memory CD8(+) T Cells Promote Melanoma-Immune Equilibrium in Skin. Nature (2019) 565(7739):366–71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0812-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sharma M, Khong H, Fa’ak F, Bentebibel SE, Janssen LME, Chesson BC, et al. Bempegaldesleukin Selectively Depletes Intratumoral Tregs and Potentiates T Cell-Mediated Cancer Therapy. Nat Commun (2020) 11:661. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14471-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar