Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 11 July 2022
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) View all 20 articles

Plasma Complement 3 and Complement 4 Are Promising Biomarkers for Distinguishing NMOSD From MOGAD and Are Associated With the Blood-Brain-Barrier Disruption in NMOSD

Liuyu  LinLiuyu LinYuqing WuYuqing WuHailun  HangHailun HangJie Lu*Jie Lu*Yuanliang DingYuanliang Ding
  • Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Background and Objective: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-IgG) associated disease (MOGAD) are autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). As the clinical features of NMOSD are similar to MOGAD, diagnostic confusion exists between the two diseases. To better discriminate NMOSD from MOGAD, we investigated whether the plasma levels of complement 3 (C3) and complement 4 (C4) are different in NMOSD and MOGAD during the acute attacks of the diseases. We sought to determine whether C3 or C4 has an influence on the features of NMOSD.

Methods: In this observational study, data from 73 aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG) positive NMOSD patients and 22 MOG-IgG positive MOGAD patients were collected retrospectively. Demographics, clinical characteristics, plasma parameters, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings will be analyzed for comparability between the two groups. Immunoglobulin-G (IgG) and albumin were measured in both plasma and CSF. Plasma levels of C3 and C4 were measured and compared between the NMOSD, MOGAD, and 42 healthy controls (HC). The correlations between plasma C3, C4, and NMOSD clinical parameters were analyzed.

Results: The ages of onset were later in the AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD group and females predominated, which differed from the MOGAD group, whose ages were younger and with a slight male preponderance. The AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD patients presented with the clinical symptoms of optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM), whereas encephalitis symptoms were more prevalent in MOGAD patients. CSF analysis shows that slight but not significantly higher white cell count (WCC) and protein were observed in the MOGAD group than in the AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD group. The plasma levels of IgG in MOGAD patients are significantly lower (p = 0.027) than in NMOSD patients. On the contrary, the plasma levels of albumin in MOGAD were higher than in NMOSD, which reached statistical significance (p = 0.039). Both the plasma C3 and C4 levels in the NMOSD group were significantly lower than in MOGAD and HC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the prediction model comprises C3 and C4 to distinguish NMOSD from MOGAD [area under the curve (AUC): 0.731, 0.645], which are considered to have discriminatory values. The results of Spearman’s analysis revealed that there was a significant positive correlation between the plasma C3 and the CSF WCC (r = 0.383, p = 0.040). There was an inverse correlation between plasma C4 and plasma IgG (r = -0.244, p = 0.038). Plasma C3 or C4 was significantly positively correlated with CSF albumin and Q-Alb, which is considered a measure of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption.

Conclusion: During the acute phase of NMOSD and MOGAD, plasma C3 and C4 may become potential biomarkers for distinguishing the two diseases and reflecting the NMOSD BBB damage.

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is a chronic, severe autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with the optic nerves and the spinal cord as primary target sites (1). It is widely accepted that the antibody target for the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is a pathogenic marker of NMOSD (2). Most NMOSD patients are seropositive for AQP4-IgG, but a proportion of NMOSD patients remain negative despite the use of cell-based assays (CBA) (3). In AQP4-IgG seronegative NMOSD, approximately 15% to 40% of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody (MOG-IgG) are present (4, 5). Using the CBA, MOG-IgG was also detected in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), encephalitis, optic neuritis (ON), and myelitis (6). MOG-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) has distinct biomarker, clinical, and radiologic characteristics from NMOSD and is considered an independent disease entity.

Experimental studies have indicated that AQP4-IgG primarily attacks the water channels of the astrocytes through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (7) or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) (8). The pathogenic mechanisms mediated by the complement system in MOGAD may be distinct from those in NMOSD (9). Since the activation of complement 3 (C3) and complement 4 (C4) is the core of complement activation, C3 and C4 are indispensable parts of the complement system (10). Previous studies showed plasma C3 (11) or C4 (12) was significantly lower in NMOSD compared to multiple sclerosis. Less focus has been given to the different levels of C3 and C4 in NMOSD and MOGAD. Therefore, the plasma C3, C4 levels be measured in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD, MOGAD, and healthy controls (HC) to determine if there are any differences in AQP4-IgG or MOG-IgG associated effector mechanisms. Our study is also required to determine if there is a relationship between C3, C4 and the clinical features of NMOSD.

Methods

Samples

Patients who were recruited from the affiliated brain hospital of Nanjing Medical University between 2012 and 2021 were included in this single-center, retrospective observational study. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) be 18 years of age or older, and (2) be seropositive for AQP4-IgG by commercial CBA, meeting the IPND 2015 criteria (1) for NMOSD; (3) be seropositive for MOG-IgG by commercial CBA, meeting the Jarius et al. criteria (6) for MOGAD; (4) all plasma and CSF samples from NMOSD and MOGAD patients were in the acute phase of the diseases. Exclusion criteria included being seronegative for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG, having a disease that affects the complement system, or having missing clinical data. Overall, 73 NMOSD patients and 22 MOGAD patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this study. 42 healthy controls (HC) were recruited from the surrounding community. HC subjects suffering from neurological diseases or systemic autoimmune diseases were excluded. All patients will be included in this study after signing the informed consent. The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the affiliated Brain hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Data Collection

The demographic information, including gender and age at onset, was recorded. The clinical and paraclinical data were obtained from the electronic medical records and were compared between NMOSD and MOGAD. The clinical data included annual relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at sampling, clinical symptoms, and pharmacological treatments. The paraclinical data recorded included IgG and albumin, both in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF white cell count (WCC), CSF protein, oligoclonal bands, IgG index, CSF/plasma albumin ratio (Q-Alb), and plasma levels of C3, C4 were collected and analyzed. To assess the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the CSF/plasma albumin ratio (Q-Alb) was considered a marker, and the detection of the IgG index was used as an indicator of intrathecal IgG synthesis. Plasma and CSF samples were obtained from NMOSD and MOGAD patients at the time of disease attack before hormone shock therapy. AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG are also important indicators to distinguish NMOSD from MOGAD. The serum AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG were all detected by a standardized immunohistochemical cell-based assay (CBA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Euroimmun, Germany) and using HEK293 cells transfected with human AQP4-M23 as a target to determine the titers. Plasma C3 and C4 were measured by immunofluorescence. Plasma levels of C3 (reference range, 0.90-1.80g/L) and C4 (reference range, 0.10-0.40g/L) were compared between AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, MOGAD and HC.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS (version 24) software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in quantitative variables were compared using the student t statistics or Mann-Whitney U tests, while the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability methods were used for comparison of categorical variables. Comparisons between three groups (NMOSD group, MOGAD group, and HC group) were performed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis-test. The corrected p-values using the Bonferroni correction to avoid type I errors. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma C3, C4 for differentiating NMOSD from MOGAD. To analyze correlations between plasma C3, C4 and EDSS, CSF findings, albumin and IgG both in plasma and CSF, IgG index, and Q-Alb, the Spearman correlation was used for correlation analysis.

Results

Demographic, Clinical Features, and Treatment in NMOSD and MOGAD Patients

A total of 73 AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD patients, 22 MOG-IgG positive MOGAD patients, and 42 HC were enrolled in this study. Table 1 shows the demographics, ARR, disease duration, EDSS, clinical symptoms, and immunotherapy treatment in the NMOSD and MOGAD groups. Compared to MOGAD, there was a female gender dominance of the NMOSD participants (94.52% vs. 27.27%, p<0.001). The age at onset in the NMOSD group is slightly older than in the MOGAD group, but has not reached statistical significance. There was no significant difference between NMOSD and MOGAD regarding ARR, disease duration, or EDSS. Significance differences were found between the NMOSD and MOGAD groups regarding the clinical symptoms. In summary, more optic neuritis (ON, 57.53% vs. 31.82%, p = 0.034) and transverse myelitis (TM, 75.34% vs. 31.82%, p<0.001) present in NMOSD, whereas acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM, 9.59% vs. 50%, p<0.001) is common in MOGAD.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 The detailed findings of Demographic, clinical features, and treatment in NMOSD and MOGAD patients.

In our cohort, receipt of a high dose of corticoid medication was found in all NMOSD and MOGAD patients during the acute-phase. Most NMOSD (97.21%) and MOGAD (95.45%) patients were started at a dose of 500mg/d and gradually tapered, maintaining a dose of 10–15 mg/d in remission. In addition to hormone shock therapy, some patients use intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) or plasma exchange (PLEX) during the acute phase to improve treatment efficacy. The use of immunosuppressants is associated with slow disease progression and reduced relapse in patients who have had CNS demyelinating diseases. In our cohort, mycophenolate mofetil was the most frequently used immunosuppressant in remission, followed by azathioprine. Eleven NMOSD patients and one MOGAD patient had been treated with Azathioprine. The other two NMOSD patients in the study had received cyclosporine and rituximab, respectively.

Comparison of Plasma and CSF Detailed Findings Among Patients With NMOSD and MOGAD Patients

Detection of antibodies by the CBA test allowed quantitative measurements of AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG serum titers. The median AQP4-IgG titer is 1:100 (IQR: 1:32-1:320) and the MOG-IgG titer is 1:10 (IQR: 1:10-1:100). Table 2 summarizes the plasma and CSF detailed findings of the study subjects. In this study, the CSF samples of 29 NMOSD and 17 MOGAD patients were collected and analyzed before any treatment. In terms of findings of WCC, protein, and oligoclonal bands positivity in CSF, no significant difference could be detected between patients with NMOSD and MOGAD groups. Significant differences were also not observed in the comparison of the two groups regarding Q-Alb and the IgG index. Regardless of the slight differences in levels of IgG and albumin in CSF, there were significant differences in plasma (p = 0.027 and p = 0.039, respectively). The NMOSD group plasma level of C3, C4 was lower in the HC and MODAD groups, where the difference reached statistical significance. There were no significant differences in plasma levels of C3, C4 in MOGAD and HC. The differences in levels of plasma C3, C4 in HC, NMOSD, and MOGAD groups were presented as scatter dot plots, which had medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) (Figure 1A, B). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that plasma C3, C4 dramatically distinguished NMOSD from MOGAD (Figure 2). The models to differentiate between NMOSD and MOGAD were evaluated by area under curve (AUC). Plasma C3 and C4 had AUCs of 0.731 and 0.645, respectively, which was considered moderately predictive.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Plasma and CSF detailed findings among patients with NMOSD and MOGAD patients.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Plasma levels of C3 (A) and C4 (B) in heathy control, AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD, and MOGAD. Results are presented as scatter plots with the median and interquartile range (IQR). The statistically significant differences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis-test and the corrected p-values using the Bonferroni. C3, complement 3; C4, complement 4; HC, healthy control; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; MOGAD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 The ROC curve is used to assess the discriminating ability of plasma C3, C4 in NMOSD and MOGAD. The AUC values showed the predictive power of the C3 (0.731) and C4 (0.645). ROC, receiver-operating characteristic; AUC, area under curve; C3, complement 3; C4, complement 4.

Correlations Between Plasma C3, C4 and Clinical Features of NMOSD Patients

Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the correlation between plasma C3, C4, and EDSS, the plasma level of IgG, and albumin. The correlation between the plasma C3, C4, and CSF findings (WCC, protein, IgG, and albumin), Q-Alb, and IgG index were also examined by Spearman correlation analysis. Negative correlations were much less common than positive correlations. The results of the Spearman correlation analysis are shown in Table 3. Plasma C3 and C4 do not correlate with EDSS (Figures 3A, J, respectively), CSF-protein (Figures 3C, L, respectively), CSF-IgG (Figures 3D, M, respectively), plasma albumin (Figures 3G, P, respectively), and IgG index (Figures 3I, R, respectively). Similar unmeaningful results were attained when the correlation between Plasma C4 and CSF-WCC was examined (Figure 3K). A significant association between plasma C3 and CSF-WCC was found (r = 0.383, p = 0.040, Figure 3B). However, no significant association was found between plasma C3 and plasma-IgG (Figure 3F). The results of the analysis show a correlation between plasma C4 and plasma IgG (r = -0.244, p = 0.038, Figure 3O). Plasma C3 significantly correlates with CSF albumin (r = 0.448, p = 0.015, Figure 3E), and Q-Alb (r = 0.500, p = 0.006, Figure 3H). Similarly, it was found that good correlations exist between plasma C4 and CSF albumin (r = 0.412, p = 0.026, Figure 3N), and Q-Alb (r = 0.377, p = 0.043, Figure 3Q).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Correlations between plasma C3, C4, and EDSS, immunological findings of NMOSD patients.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 The association between plasma C3, C4 and NMOSD features was analysed by Spearman’s correlation. C3, complement 3; C4, complement 4; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; WCC, white cell count; IgG: immunoglobulin-G; Q-Alb, CSF/plasma albumin ratio. The (A–I) shows the Spearman results of serum complement C3 and EDSS (A), CSF WCC (B), CSF protein (C), CSF-IgG (D), CSF albumin (E), plasma IgG (F), plasma albumin (G), Q-Alb (H), and IgG index (I), respectively. There is a significant association between plasma CSF WCC, CSF albumin, and Q-Alb. The (J–R) shows the Spearman results of serum complement C4 and EDSS (J), CSF WCC (K), CSF protein (L), CSF-IgG (M), CSF albumin (N), plasma IgG (O), plasma albumin (P), Q-Alb (Q), and IgG index (R), respectively. Positive associations exist between plasma C4 and CSF albumin, and Q-Alb respectively. A negative association exists between plasma C4 and plasma IgG.

Discussion

Our study also provides evidence that NMOSD and MOGAD are two distinct diseases, as reflected by demographic, clinical, and molecular data. In our cohort, female patients account for 94.5% of all NMOSD patients, while female patients only account for 27.3% of all MOGAD. Discrepancies in the male to female incidence ratio in the MOGAD group from the previous study are likely due to the low sample size (13). The age onset was not compatible among the NMOSD and MOGAD groups. We saw a preference for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD in the ON and TM, while ADEM was more likely observed in MOGAD, which is in line with previous research (14).

Compared to the plasma median of the MOG-IgG titer, the AQP4-IgG titer is higher, these discrepancies could be due to different sensitivity of assay methods. In a multicenter study, although the CBA detect the MOG-IgG showed excellent agreement with other assays for both highly positive and negative samples, the low positive remained (15). NMOSD patients show significantly higher plasma immunoglobulin (IgG) than MOGAD patients (p = 0.027), which may reflect the different molecular mechanisms that exist in the two diseases. In vitro in vivo findings have shown that when reaching serum AQP4-IgG titers in experimental animals comparable with NMOSD patients, they are sufficient to trigger immune cascade reactions (16), while only the affinity-purified MOG-IgG extracted from MOGAD has the potential to cause pathogenicity (17). Therefore, we speculated that the CNS is more susceptible to inflammatory attack by AQP4-IgG than MOG-IgG. In our cohort study, plasma levels of albumin in NMOSD were significantly lower than in MOGAD. Yao et al. (18) reported that the low level of plasma albumin is associated with more disease severity in NMOSD. A possible explanation for our result as follows: Albumin has the potential to regulate immunology, anti-inflammatory function, and its decrease has also been described as associated with increased systemic inflammatory load (19). This implies a more vigorous inflammatory load produced by NMOSD.

Compelling evidence also shows that different underlying autoimmune-driven mechanisms exist in the NMOSD and MOGAD, in which the complement system plays an important role (20, 21). There is substantial evidence that complement analytes have been proved to distinguish MS from NMOSD (22). However, there are comparatively few studies on whether the levels of the complement components are different in NMOSD and MOGAD. C3, C4 are the central component of complement, and C3 is the convergent point of all the complement activation pathways (classical pathway, lectin pathway, or alternative pathway). C3,C4 are key complement factor in the complement activation pathway and reacts with C5, C6, C7, C8, and C9, participate in the formation of membrane attack complex (MAC, C5b-9), which acts as a permeability pore to cause astrocyte injury, followed by the BBB disruption, myelin loss, gliosis, and neuronal death in NMOSD (23). Our results indicated that the plasma levels of C3, C4 in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD patients were lower than MOGAD and reached statistical significance, these results tallied with previous studies (12, 24). No statistical difference was observed in the C3, C4 between the MOGAD and HC. From the ROC curve analysis, conclusions can be drawn regarding C3, C4, which can become discriminating factors for NMOSD and MOGAD. Perhaps our findings can be explained by the subtle consumption of C3, C4 in NMOSD rather than MOGAD. MOG-IgG targeted the oligodendrocytes (MOG expressed on the myelin sheath) to activate the complement system, resulting in myelin loss but relative axonal and astrocyte preservation (9). The specific mechanism of complement system mediated-injury in MOGAD needs to be studied and further elucidated.

Our results show that plasma C4 is negatively correlated with plasma-IgG, maybe the more IgG is produced, in particular AQP4-IgG, the more plasma C4 consumption. The negative correlation between C3 and plasma IgG may indicate that C3 was consumed in the synthesis of IgG (maybe AQP4-IgG). However, the relationship between C3-the convergent point of all the complement activation pathways and plasma IgG is not simply linear or nonlinear. When C3 is cleaved, it releases C3a, C3b and C3d and binds to CR1 and CR2, which are expressed in the B cells. CR1 binds C3b with high affinity to inhibit B cell receptors (BCR), which mediate B cell activation, proliferation, and antibody production. The inhibitory effects of CR2 and C3d binding on the initial steps of peripheral B cell activation play a significant role in the maintenance of peripheral B cells (25). This suggests that C3 may have a natural feedback mechanism to keep activated B cells from producing too many antibodies. Most NMOSD are seropositive for IgG1 autoantibodies against AQP4 (26), followed by the binding of AQP4 to activate CDC and ADCC mediated astrocyte injury (27). In NMOSD, there may be IgG subclass that is similar to MOGAD (MOG-IgG 1,2,3,4) (28). The IgG4 subclass in NMOSD may have limited ability to mobilize CDC and ADCC and blocks the ligand-receptor interaction of the target antigen (29). Therefore, the relationship between C3 and plasma IgG in NMOSD is complicated, and further experiments will be necessary to clarify the mechanisms involved.

Both C3 and C4 significantly correlate with CSF albumin and Q-Alb. The Q-Alb is considered a common indicator for the evaluation of the destruction of the BBB. Abundant evidence supports a pathogenesis mechanism for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD in which AQP4-IgG binds to the astrocyte endfoot of AQP4 to activate CDC via the classical pathway by binding to C1q, which is followed by C3 convertase enzymes converting C3 into C3a and C3b (20). Once cleaved, C3a sends signals and binding to its receptor C3aR, which is expressed by the vascular endothelial cells in the brain (30), resulting in the altered vascular morphology and increased BBB permeability (31). Therefore, we propose that C3 indirectly affects the BBB through the C3aR binding to C3a, which is elevated in the plasma of NMOSD (32). Increased permeability of the BBB caused by complement activation can also explain the massive infiltration of leucocytes in CSF (33). There is also evidence from a recent study that C3 is elevated in NMOSD CSF compared to controls (22), implying blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction, which leads to C3 entering into CSF and then affecting the immune environment and leukocytes in CSF. Plasma C3 positively correlates with the CSF-WCC, proposing the view that C3 has an impact on the CSF-WCC through increased blood-cerebrospinal fluid and BBB permeability. The regulation mechanism of C4 in the BBB of NMOSD patients remains elusive. C4a, is released from complement component C4 upon activation of the complement system’s classical and lectin pathways. C4a-induced activation of the protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 (PAR1, PAR4) has an impact on the stability of endothelial cells, thereby increasing the BBB permeability (34). Although the elevated C4 in CSF of NMOSD (22), it may be that the levels of plasma C4 entering the CNS through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier and the plasma C4 are not enough to cause the change in WCC.

It is important to note that there are differences in the effects of C3, and C4 in SLE. In SLE, low complement (C3, C4) is an important serological manifestation. According to a previous study, C3 has a negative relationship with IFN- and IL-18, which have the highest positive likelihood ratios for active SLE (35). Durcan et al. (36) found there is a strong relationship between low C3 and lupus nephriand that is associated with poor renal outcomes (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <50 and chronic proteinuria). C4 did not seem to affect disease activity and lupus nephritis. The discrepancy between C3 and C4 is, we propose, a more important marker due to the C3’s central role in the complement cascade, and the fact that complement components or complement activator molecules are released and play different roles in autoimmune diseases.

The present study suffers from several limitations. The MOGAD group sample size was small compared to the NMOSD group, which might have yielded statistical bias. In addition, they may be prone to recall bias because of the retrospective nature of the study. Moreover, all the participants are ethnically Chinese, so our results may yield different results and may not apply to other countries. Although the plasma levels of C3, C4 are found to be lower in NMOSD than in MOGAD, the mechanics of these factors were explored less deeply during the study. Further studies about the complement system in the pathogenesis of mediated tissue injury in CNS inflammatory demyelinating disorders need to be performed and to elaborate on the specific mechanisms more deeply and accurately.

Conclusion

Our study reveals that there seems to be more plasma C3, C4 consumption in the NMOSD, further implying that the plasma C3, C4 can be able to distinguish the NMOSD from MOGAD. Plasma C3 or C4 may become potential biomarkers reflecting BBB disruption in NMOSD.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

LL participated in the conceptualization, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the original manuscript. YW proofread the data and analyzed the data again. HH visualized the data. JL and YD reviewed and suggested the manuscript and provided financial support. All authors approved the final manuscript before submission.

Funding

The research is financially sponsored by the National Natural Science Research Foundation of China (81500969).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Neurology (2015) 85:177–89. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jarius S, Wildemann B. AQP4 Antibodies in Neuromyelitis Optica: Diagnostic and Pathogenetic Relevance. Nat Rev Neurol (2010) 6:383–92. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jarius S, Probst C, Borowski K, Franciotta D, Wildemann B, Stoecker W, et al. Standardized Method for the Detection of Antibodies to Aquaporin-4 Based on a Highly Sensitive Immunofluorescence Assay Employing Recombinant Target Antigen. J Neurological Sci (2010) 291:52–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.01.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hamid SHM, Whittam D, Mutch K, Linaker S, Solomon T, Das K, et al. What Proportion of AQP4-Igg-Negative NMO Spectrum Disorder Patients are MOG-Igg Positive? A Cross Sectional Stud 132 Patients J Neurol (2017) 264:2088–94. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8596-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mao Z, Lu Z, Hu X. Distinction Between MOG Antibody-Positive and AQP4 Antibody-Positive NMO Spectrum Disorders. Neurology (2014) 83:1122. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000830

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Jarius S, Paul F, Aktas O, Asgari N, Dale RC, de Seze J, et al. MOG Encephalomyelitis: International Recommendations on Diagnosis and Antibody Testing. J Neuroinflamm (2018) 15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ratelade J, Asavapanumas N, Ritchie AM, Wemlinger S, Bennett JL, Verkman AS. Involvement of Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity in Inflammatory Demyelination in a Mouse Model of Neuromyelitis Optica. Acta neuropathologica (2013) 126:699–709. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1172-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yick LW, Ma OK, Ng RC, Kwan JS, Chan KH. Aquaporin-4 Autoantibodies From Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Patients Induce Complement-Independent Immunopathologies in Mice. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1438. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Fang L, Kang X, Wang Z, Wang S, Wang J, Zhou Y, et al. Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-Igg Contributes to Oligodendrocytopathy in the Presence of Complement, Distinct From Astrocytopathy Induced by AQP4-Igg. Neurosci Bull (2019) 35:853–66. doi: 10.1007/s12264-019-00375-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Romano R, Giardino G, Cirillo E, Prencipe R, Pignata C. Complement System Network in Cell Physiology and in Human Diseases. Int Rev Immunol (2021) 40:159–70. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2020.1833877

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hakobyan S, Luppe S, Evans DR, Harding K, Loveless S, Robertson NP, et al. Plasma Complement Biomarkers Distinguish Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills Basingstoke England) (2017) 23:946–55. doi: 10.1177/1352458516669002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Pache F, Ringelstein M, Aktas O, Kleiter I, Jarius S, Siebert N, et al. C3 and C4 Complement Levels in AQP4-Igg-Positive NMOSD and in MOGAD. J Neuroimmunol (2021) 360:577699. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577699

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chen JJ, Bhatti MT. Clinical Phenotype, Radiological Features, and Treatment of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-Immunoglobulin G (MOG-Igg) Optic Neuritis. Curr Opin Neurol (2020) 33:47–54. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shahriari M, Sotirchos ES, Newsome SD, Yousem DM. MOGAD: How it Differs From and Resembles Other Neuroinflammatory Disorders. AJR. Am J Roentgenol (2021) 216:1031–9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Reindl M, Schanda K, Woodhall M, Tea F, Ramanathan S, Sagen J, et al. International Multicenter Examination of MOG Antibody Assays. Neurology(R) Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 7 (2020). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000674

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bradl M, Misu T, Takahashi T, Watanabe M, Mader S, Reindl M, et al. Neuromyelitis Optica: Pathogenicity of Patient Immunoglobulin In Vivo. Ann Neurol (2009) 66:630–43. doi: 10.1002/ana.21837

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Spadaro M, Winklmeier S, Beltrán E, Macrini C, Höftberger R, Schuh E, et al. Pathogenicity of Human Antibodies Against Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein. Ann Neurol (2018) 84:315–28. doi: 10.1002/ana.25291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yao XY, Wu YF, Gao MC, Hong RH, Ding J, Hao Y, et al. Serum Albumin Level is Associated With the Severity of Neurological Dysfunction of NMOSD Patients. Multiple Sclerosis Related Disord (2020) 43:102130. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102130

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Xu M, Cen M, Chen X, Chen H, Liu X, Cao Q. Correlation Between Serological Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. BioMed Res Int (2019) 2019:6517549. doi: 10.1155/2019/6517549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Asavapanumas N, Tradtrantip L, Verkman AS. Targeting the Complement System in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Expert Opin Biol Ther (2021) 21:1073–86. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1884223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Carpanini SM, Torvell M, Morgan BP. Therapeutic Inhibition of the Complement System in Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Front Immunol (2019) 10:362. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zelek WM, Fathalla D, Morgan A, Touchard S, Loveless S, Tallantyre E, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Complement System Biomarkers in Demyelinating Disease. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills Basingstoke England) (2020) 26:1929–37. doi: 10.1177/1352458519887905

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dalakas MC, Alexopoulos H, Spaeth PJ. Complement in Neurological Disorders and Emerging Complement-Targeted Therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol (2020) 16:601–17. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0400-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Qin C, Chen B, Tao R, Chen M, Ma X, Shang K, et al. The Clinical Value of Complement Proteins in Differentiating AQP4-Igg-Positive From MOG-Igg-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Multiple Sclerosis Related Disord (2019) 35:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.06.035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Erdei A, Kovacs KG, Nagy-Balo Z, Lukacsi S, Macsik-Valent B, Kurucz I, et al. New Aspects in the Regulation of Human B Cell Functions by Complement Receptors CR1, CR2, CR3 and CR4. Immunol Lett (2021) 237:42–57. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2021.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR. Igg Marker of Optic-Spinal Multiple Sclerosis Binds to the Aquaporin-4 Water Channel. J Exp Med (2005) 202:473–7. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wu Y, Zhong L, Geng J. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Experimental Models. Multiple Sclerosis Related Disord (2019) 27:412–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.12.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mariotto S, Ferrari S, Monaco S, Benedetti MD, Schanda K, Alberti D, et al. Clinical Spectrum and Igg Subclass Analysis of Anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Syndromes: A Multicenter Study. J Neurol (2017) 264:2420–30. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8635-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zografou C, Vakrakou AG, Stathopoulos P. Short- and Long-Lived Autoantibody-Secreting Cells in Autoimmune Neurological Disorders. Front Immunol (2021) 12:686466. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Schraufstatter IU, Trieu K, Sikora L, Sriramarao P, DiScipio R. Complement C3a and C5a Induce Different Signal Transduction Cascades in Endothelial Cells. J Immunol (Baltimore Md: 1950) (2002) 169:2102–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.4.2102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Propson NE, Roy ER, Litvinchuk A, Köhl J, Zheng H. Endothelial C3a Receptor Mediates Vascular Inflammation and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability During Aging. J Clin Invest 131 (2021). doi: 10.1172/JCI140966

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Nytrova P, Potlukova E, Kemlink D, Woodhall M, Horakova D, Waters P, et al. Complement Activation in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica. J Neuroimmunol (2014) 274:185–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The Spectrum of Neuromyelitis Optica. Lancet Neurol (2007) 6:805–15. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wang H, Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement-Activation Fragment C4a Mediates Effector Functions by Binding as Untethered Agonist to Protease-Activated Receptors 1 and 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America (2017) 114:10948–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707364114

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ruchakorn N, Ngamjanyaporn P, Suangtamai T, Kafaksom T, Polpanumas C, Petpisit V, et al. Performance of Cytokine Models in Predicting SLE Activity. Arthritis Res Ther (2019) 21:287. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2029-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Durcan L, Petri M. The Clinical and Serological Associations of Hypocomplementemia in a Longitudinal Sle Cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheumatism (2020) 50:1081–6. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, complement 3, complement 4, blood brain barrier (BBB)

Citation: Lin L, Wu Y, Hang H, Lu J and Ding Y (2022) Plasma Complement 3 and Complement 4 Are Promising Biomarkers for Distinguishing NMOSD From MOGAD and Are Associated With the Blood-Brain-Barrier Disruption in NMOSD. Front. Immunol. 13:853891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.853891

Received: 13 January 2022; Accepted: 14 June 2022;
Published: 11 July 2022.

Edited by:

Yu Cai, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Shuhei Nishiyama, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Petra Nytrová, Charles University, Czechia

Copyright © 2022 Lin, Wu, Hang, Lu and Ding. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jie Lu, lujieyx@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.