The Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Tumorigenesis is a complicated process caused by successive genetic and epigenetic alterations. The past decades demonstrated that the immune system affects tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis. Although increasing immunotherapies are revealed, only a tiny proportion of them are effective. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of single-stranded RNA molecules larger than 200 nucleotides and are essential in the molecular network of oncology and immunology. Increasing researches have focused on the connection between lncRNAs and cancer immunotherapy. However, the in-depth mechanisms are still elusive. In this review, we outline the latest studies on the functions of lncRNAs in the tumor immune microenvironment. Via participating in various biological processes such as neutrophil recruitment, macrophage polarization, NK cells cytotoxicity, and T cells functions, lncRNAs regulate tumorigenesis, tumor invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and angiogenesis. In addition, we reviewed the current understanding of the relevant strategies for targeting lncRNAs. LncRNAs-based therapeutics may represent promising approaches in serving as prognostic biomarkers or potential therapeutic targets in cancer, providing ideas for future research and clinical application on cancer diagnosis and therapies.

1 Introduction

The immune system and cancer progression are tightly connected. When immune cells recognize exogenous threats or endogenous mutations, they respond to changes in the microenvironment, from a static sentinel role to an active responder. For example, the cancer antigens are presented to T-cells via antigen-presenting cells (APCs). T-cells are activated after recognizing cancer cells and allow effector T-cells, other endogenous immune cells, and antibodies to eliminate cancer cells (1–3). However, the limited antigen recognition, pro-tumor phenotype differentiation, immune suppression, and impaired immune cell functions are all contributors to cancer development (4–6). Therefore, it is indispensable to improve the understanding of tumor immunology.

LncRNAs have revealed the diverse regulatory roles in immune responses and cancer progression. Different from mRNAs, the biogenesis of lncRNAs is associated with their specific subcellular localizations and functions. Depending on their localization and their specific interactions with DNA, RNA, and proteins, lncRNAs can modulate chromatin function, regulate the stability and translation of cytoplasmic mRNAs and interfere with signaling pathways. LncRNAs participated in immune activities such as antigen presentation, immune cells activation, and immune responses (7–10).

Cancer immunotherapy has aroused increasing interest. Unlike conventional systemic therapies that are directly cytotoxic to tumor cells, cancer immunotherapy depends on the immune system to set antitumor effects. Therefore, various factors that may affect host tumor immunity should be considered for proper design (11). LncRNAs are encouraged to be incorporated into cancer immunotherapy investigations, given their critical involvement in shaping immune responses. Targeting lncRNAs represents an attractive approach for potential biomarkers and therapeutical strategies, owning to its condition-specific expression pattern (12). A better understanding of lncRNAs-mediated approaches will provide new insights into the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.

In this review, we summarized functions and regulating mechanisms of lncRNAs in in tumor immune microenvironment from various perspectives. In addition, we reviewed the current understanding of the relevant strategies for targeting lncRNAs. This review highlighted the essential roles of these lncRNAs-mediated approaches, which have great potential in immunotherapies to facilitate future cancer diagnosis and treatment.

2 Biogenesis and Functions of LncRNA

Non-coding RNA refers to a functional RNA molecule that can hardly be translated into protein. A large number of researches have shown that non-coding RNA plays an increasingly important role in the regulation of epigenetics. Common non-coding RNAs with regulatory effects include small interfering RNA, miRNA, piRNA, and lncRNA. LncRNA is a kind of non-coding RNA with a length greater than 200 nucleotides. The origin of lncRNA is still not clear, and the possible origins have been demonstrated: (a) Mutations of protein-coding genes; (b) Chromosomal rearrangement: lncRNA can be produced by recombination of separated gene sequences; (c) Duplications: The adjacent structural units in the lncRNA sequence are repeated, increasing the length of the transcript; (d) Transposon insertion: Inserting transposable elements containing transcription initiation sites into the genome to produce functional lncRNA sequences (13–16). According to the relative position of lncRNA coding sequence and protein-coding gene, it can be divided into several categories: sense lncRNA, antisense lncRNA, bidirectional lncRNA, intronic lncRNA and intergenic lncRNA (9, 17, 18).

Although lncRNA was initially thought to be a by-product of RNA polymerase II transcription, a kind of “noise” without biological function. Although lncRNA generally has no protein-coding ability actually, some of them can encode some short peptides. In recent years, lncRNA has become a research hotspot. LncRNA has a similar structure to mRNA. After splicing, it has a poly-A tail and promoter structure. There are dynamic expressions and different splicing methods during the differentiation process to form different lncRNA. Moreover, the conservation of lncRNA is low. The expression of lncRNA has tissue specificity and spatiotemporal characteristics. LncRNA expression varies from different tissues, different growth stages, and different locations (19–24). The features of lncRNAs have been studied and shown that lncRNAs play a vital role in many life activities such as dosage compensation effect, epigenetic regulation, cell cycle regulation, and cell differentiation (17, 25).

LncRNAs participate in regulating various processes in the nucleus and cytoplasm, having a powerful regulatory effect in gene expression, and exerting cellular effects through various mechanisms. LncRNAs elicit functional outcomes through modular domains to interact with DNA, RNA, various regulatory proteins, and signaling (Figure 1A) (26, 27): (a) Transcription level. Local lncRNAs regulate the expression of adjacent protein-coding genes through transcription programs. The lncRNA transcript can regulate the act of transcription or splicing of the lncRNA can generate a chromatin state or steric impediment that influences the expression of nearby genes (10, 28). (b) Epigenetic modification level. Epigenetic modification includes histone and DNA methylation, histone acetylation and ubiquitin-like. Both cis-acting and trans-acting nuclear lncRNAs establish interactions with DNA to alter the chromatin environment or binding DNA in a sequence-specific manner (10). (c) Post-transcriptional level. LncRNAs can regulate post-transcriptional mRNA functions by complementary base pairing with target mRNA. The formation of RNA duplexes between complementary lncRNA and mRNA may conceal essential mRNA required for binding reaction factors, potentially affecting post-transcriptional gene expression, including mRNA precursor processing, transport, translation, and degradation (29). MicroRNA (miRNA) can directly bind to mRNAs by specific identification in a base-pairing manner, and thus inducing mRNA degradation at the post-transcriptional level by forming RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with related proteins such as Argonaute 2 (AGO2). LncRNAs act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to harbor the miRNA response elements (MREs) with complementary miRNA binding sites, sponging miRNA or keeping miRNAs away from mRNAs (30); (d) LncRNA–protein. LncRNAs interact with proteins, serving as molecular scaffolds, guides, or decoys to modulate protein function and interactions (31–34).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Mechanisms of lncRNA function and tumor immune microenvironment. (A) LncRNA regulate their targets via various mechanisms, including both the transcriptional and post transcriptional levels. (1) MicroRNA sponge; (2) interaction with protein; (3) interaction with mRNA; (4) peptide formation; (5) lncRNA in MVBs; (6) Chromatin modification; (7) DNA interaction. (B) Components of the tumor immune microenvironment. The tumor immune microenvironment is a complex ecosystem, consist of cancer cells, immune cells, and vascular network, etc. Induced by the cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, tumor-infiltrating immune cells of both the myeloid and lymphoid lineages are recruited and activated. Created with BioRender.com.

Based on these characteristics, lncRNAs can be used as a critical regulator in many aspects of biological activities, such as regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The regulatory roles of lncRNAs on immune cells and tumor cells have become a new direction for studying cancer immunology.

3 Tumor Immune Microenvironment

The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has received significant attention in recent years. TIME comprises tumor cells, immune cells, tumor-related fibroblasts, surround micro-vessels, various cytokines, and extracellular matrix (ECM) (Figure 1B) (6). TIME is a complex integrated system. If tumor cells are considered as seeds, then the microenvironment would act as soil. Tumor cells and their microenvironment interact and evolve together, affecting the generation and progression of tumors (35).

The tumor microenvironment presents the characteristics of hypoxia. Due to insufficient oxygen supply, tumor cells mainly undergo anaerobic glycolysis, leading to lactic acid accumulation (36). Meanwhile, ion-exchange proteins on the tumor cell membrane also continuously transport H+ outside the cells. These cellular responses cause the pH of the tumor microenvironment to decrease. In the hypoxic and acidic microenvironment, tumor tissues and peripheral tissue cells will undergo apoptosis, releasing cell debris and chemokines, leading to infiltration of inflammatory cells and secretion of inflammatory factors. In addition, the tumor itself can also trigger an immune response, causing inflammatory cells to accumulate in this area, triggering the inflammatory response (37, 38).

Tumor cells and tumor microenvironment complement each other. The tumor immune microenvironment is closely related to the efficacy of immunotherapy. Tumors can affect their microenvironment by releasing signaling molecules, promoting tumor angiogenesis and immune tolerance. Immune cells and other components in the microenvironment can affect the growth and development of cancer cells (35). For example, the infiltrated immune cells participate in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment formation to facilitate immune escape and malignant development. Among them, regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a significant role. Macrophages have different subtypes in the tumor microenvironment. Studies have shown that M1-type macrophages mainly inhibit tumors, promoting inflammation and immune activity. In contrast, M2-type macrophages play a role in tissue repair, immune escape, and promote tumor progression (39, 40). In addition to immune cells, many non-immune components constitute the tumor microenvironment, such as fibroblasts, vascular endothelial cells, and other stromal cells. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) can release stromal cell-derived factors and pro-angiogenesis factors to promote tumor cell growth and metastasis. Vascular endothelial cells mainly mediate tumor angiogenesis (41, 42). By learning tumor immune microenvironment, clinical diagnosis and treatment can be better guided, and precision medicine can be realized.

4 Tumor Immune Escape

The host’s immune system has the function of immune surveillance to recognize and specifically eliminate these “non-self” cells through the immune mechanism to resist tumorigenesis and tumor development (43). However, in some cases, malignant cells can evade the body’s immune surveillance, escape the recognition and attack of the body’s immune system through various mechanisms (43, 44). The in-depth study of tumor immune escape mechanisms provides new ideas for the exploration of tumor immunotherapy (5, 44). Mechanisms resulting in immune escape include the selection of tumor variants resistant to immune effectors and the tumor immune-suppressive environment (45).

Immune escape can be achieved through intrinsic tumor properties or the tumor microenvironment, that include (1) Low expression of tumor-associated antigens. Tumor-specific CD8+ T cells are activated by recognizing tumor antigens, depending on the specific recognition and binding of TCR to MHC-I-peptide complexes. Decreased expression of tumor-associated antigens affects the recognition of MHC molecule antigen peptide complexes by TCR (46, 47). (2) Low expression of MHC molecules. The lack of presentation of MHC-I molecules is often one of the main reasons for tumor immune escape (48). (3) Tumor cells lack costimulatory molecules. Even though tumor cells can directly present tumor antigens to T cells through the MHC molecules, they cannot activate T cells due to the lack of costimulatory signals, resulting in T cell immune response and even tolerance induction (49). (4) Tumor apoptosis is suppressed. The Fas/FasL system is of great significance in immune escape. Fas belongs to the TNF receptor family, and its ligand FasL can mediate cell apoptosis. On the one hand, the tumor cells themselves only express a little or no Fas to be protected from attack by themselves or immune cells. On the other hand, the tumor cells actively express FasL to kill the infiltrating Fas-positive effector cells (50, 51).

Tumor-related immunosuppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment are the contributors to immune escape. Immune checkpoint molecules are inhibitory regulatory molecules expressed on immune cells, suppressing the effective anti-tumor immune response. Under physiological conditions, immune checkpoint molecules regulate the immune system, dampening the immune response after mitigating an infection or other threats (52). However, these immune checkpoint interactions may also be engaged in the development of cancer (53, 54). The immune checkpoint molecules related to tumors mainly include PD1, CTLA4, Tim3, LAG3, etc. Currently, PD1 and CTLA4 are mainly studied. Programmed death molecule 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) are a pair of negative immunostimulatory molecules (55). Under normal circumstances, after PD-L1 is combined with PD-1 on the surface of lymphocytes, it can inhibit lymphocyte function and induce apoptosis of activated lymphocytes, thereby exerting autoimmune tolerance. However, PD-L1 is also expressed on the surface of many tumor cells. PD-L1 expressed by tumor cells can bind to PD-1 on the surface of corresponding lymphocytes, inhibit the function of lymphocytes and the release of cytokines, lead to lymphocyte apoptosis and immune escape of tumor cells (56). In recent years, immunotherapy has been considered a promising treatment strategy, which utilizes the host’s immune system to combat malignant cells by inhibiting the immune checkpoint pathway. Therefore, blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can enhance the activity of lymphocytes to achieve the effect of tumor immunotherapy (57). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), also known as CD152, is a leukocyte differentiation antigen, a transmembrane receptor on T cells, and it shares B7 with CD28 Molecular ligands. The binding of CTLA-4 and B7 molecules induces T cell anergy, which participates in the negative regulation of immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are some monoclonal antibodies developed for corresponding immune checkpoints. Their primary function is to block the interaction between tumor cells expressing immune checkpoints and immune cells, thereby blocking the effect of tumor cells on immune cells (58, 59).

In the tumor microenvironment, there are many tumor-related immunosuppressive cells, including regulatory T cells (Treg), tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSC), etc. The chemokines in the tumor microenvironment recruit the Tregs in the thymus, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and the periphery to the tumor through the Treg receptor CCR4, thereby suppressing immunity. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in tumor tissues actively inhibit the immune response and plays a role in tumor development. They also facilitate the expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TGF-B, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), directly promoting tumor progression. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) can express a variety of pro-angiogenic factors, directly promote tumor angiogenesis. Also, MDSC can inhibit T cell-mediated adaptive anti-tumor immunity through the high expression of ARG1, iNOS, and ROS (60, 61).

5 LncRNAs Regulate Tumor Immune Microenvironment

5.1 LncRNAs and Innate Immune Cells in TIME

The innate immune system is the first defense line, relying on a surveillance system of neutrophils, macrophages, natural killers, and dendritic cells, which recognize and act on pathogens non-specifically. In addition, they also activate the adaptive immune system through antigen presentation (62). Recently, lncRNAs have been documented to be associated with innate immune cell development, differentiation, and immune responses (Figure 2). LncRNAs have emerged to act functionally through modular domains, regulating gene expression and modulating pathogen response pathways via interactions with chromatin, RNA, and proteins (18). Taken together, considering the critical roles of lncRNAs, it makes sense to explore the lncRNAs-mediated regulation in the TIME.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 LncRNA and innate immune cells in TIME. LncRNA is central player in cancer biology and they play a pivotal role in mediating the network communication between tumor cells and their microenvironment. Innate immune effectors including neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells, DCs, and MDSCs. LncRNA can interact with tumor-infiltrating innate immune cells to modulate their recruitment, development and function in tumor microenvironment. Created with BioRender.com.

5.1.1 LncRNAs and Neutrophils

Neutrophils derived from myeloid progenitor cells participate in natural immunity and regulate adaptive immunity (63, 64). Affected by the tumor microenvironment, neutrophils have different polarization states. Different polarization states have different effects on tumors, which can promote or inhibit tumor growth. Anti-tumor N1 type and tumor-promoting N2 type are the two main polarization types of neutrophils. The polarization of N1 neutrophils is usually induced by IFNs, IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α. While N2 neutrophils are induced by TGF-β, IL-8, IL-6, and IL-17 (65, 66). The anti-tumor mechanisms of neutrophils include: (a) N1 neutrophils directly kill tumor cells by releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen (RNS); (b) As antigen-presenting cells, neutrophils can directly stimulate T cell activation, and simultaneously release a variety of chemokines such as TNF-α, and cathepsin G to activate DCs, macrophages, NK cells, and T cells. Neutrophils have a synergistic effect with CD8+ T cells in the anti-tumor process, while Tregs limit the infiltration of neutrophils; (c) After the adaptive immune response is initiated, N1 neutrophils kill tumor cells through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity ADCC (67, 68). The pro-tumor mechanisms include: (a) N2 neutrophils secrete cytokines such as VEGF and TNF to promote tumor angiogenesis; (b) Neutrophils secrete matrix metalloprotein 9 (MMP-9) to degrade type IV collagen of the basement membrane, promoting the infiltration of tumor cells. In addition, MMPs also participate in the reconstruction of tumor extracellular matrix and promote tumor progression; (c) Granule colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and TGFβ can induce neutrophils to express arginase 1 (ARG1), ROS and nitric oxide (NO), to inhibit T cell activation; (d) Recruit anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages (67, 69, 70).

It has been demonstrated that lncRNAs participated in neutrophil recruitment, lifespan, and function. Knockdown of LINC01116 affected the secretion of IL-1β, thereby promoting the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN). The accumulation of TAN produced a large number of cytokines to promote tumor proliferation (71). Moreover, neutrophils are short-lived immune cells with a half-life of 7-10 hours in human circulation. Regulation of neutrophil lifespan is critical in the tumor immune microenvironment. LncRNAs have also been revealed to regulate the neutrophils’ lifespan (65). LncRNA Morrbid was evidenced to regulate the survival status of neutrophils. Morrbid regulated the transcription of the neighboring pro-apoptotic gene Bcl2l11 by promoting the enrichment of the PRC2 complex at the Bcl2l11 promoter to maintain a poised state. Thus, regulating Morrbid allowed rapid control of apoptosis in response to extracellular pro-survival signals, representing a potential therapeutic target (72). Besides, regulatory role was also achieved via PD1/PD-L1 pathway. LncRNA HOXA transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP) enhanced IL-6 expression to potentiate immune escape of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of PD-L1 in neutrophils. HOTTIP was noted to promote the expression of IL-6 by binding to c-jun, which resulted in a promoted PD-L1 expression in neutrophils and immune escape. Meanwhile, T cell proliferation and efficiency of tumor immunotherapy were inhibited (73). The infiltration of neutrophils in patients with gastric cancer was significantly increased, showing an activated CD54+ phenotype and expressing high levels of immunosuppressive molecule PD-L1. A significant correlation was found between the levels of PD-L1 and CD54 on tumor-infiltrating neutrophils. Tumor-derived GM-CSF activates neutrophils and induces PD-L1 expression in neutrophils through the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of the transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway. The binding of PD-1 to its ligand PD-L1 is essential for the physiological regulation of the immune system. Activated PD-L1+ neutrophils effectively inhibit normal T cell immunity in vitro and promote tumor growth and progression (74, 75).

5.1.2 LncRNAs and Macrophages

Macrophages residing in tissues can differentiate from circulating monocytes or from the fetal liver and yolk sac during embryonic development. Macrophages are the critical effector cells of innate immunity, having powerful phagocytosis. In addition, they can also release cytokines and chemokines to recruit antigen-presenting cells or T cells to initiate an adaptive immune response (76–79). Depending on microenvironmental stimuli, macrophages are able to have different phenotypes. M1 phenotype and M2 phenotype are two principal polarizations. M1-type macrophages can kill tumor cells and resist pathogen invasion, and M2-type macrophages mainly promote tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Macrophages in tumor tissues mostly have the M2 phenotype and function. Therefore, the specific M2 morphological macrophages that exert immunosuppressive and tumor-promoting effects are narrowly defined as tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) (80, 81). LPS and IFN-γ signals are M1 stimulation to induce the activation of NF-κB (p65 and p50), AP-1, IRF3, and STAT1 through the TLR4, IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-γ receptor pathways, triggering M1 polarization (82–84). IL-4 and IL-13 are M2 stimulation to activate STAT6 through IL-4Rα signal; IL-10 activates STAT3 through IL-10R signals to trigger M2 polarization (84). M1 macrophages have pro-inflammatory properties and inhibit tumor growth: (a) Direct killing effect; (b) Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC): Macrophages expressing IgGFc receptors can kill the target cells by binding to the Fc segment of IgG antibodies on the surface of tumor cells; (c) Induce specific immune response: Macrophages present antigens to promote Th1 immune response (85, 86). M2 macrophages have anti-inflammatory properties and promote tumor growth: (a) Promote tumor cell proliferation; (b) Promote angiogenesis; (c) Participate in tumor cell infiltration, and metastasis; (d) Suppress immune function; (e) Chemotherapy resistance (87–89). Understanding the regulatory role and function of lncRNAs in macrophages activities and cancer immunity will help to explore potential diagnosis and treatment methods.

Recently, there have been increasing studies about lncRNAs in macrophage differentiation, recruitment, polarization, and functions. Activin A receptor type 1B (ACVR1B) plays an essential role in the monocyte and macrophage differentiation process. Lnc-MC was reported to participate in macrophage differentiation via regulating ACVR1B expression. Mechanistically, lnc-MC as a competing endogenous RNA can interact with microRNA 199a-5p. Then the repression of ACVR1B expression was alleviated. Consequently, the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signal pathway was activated, and monocyte/macrophage differentiation was facilitated (90, 91). In addition, there were reports about lncRNAs in macrophage recruitment. Calcium (Ca2+) flux and Ca2+-dependent signaling play key roles in tumor growth and progression. A study revealed that lncRNA calcium-dependent kinase activation (lncRNA CamK-A) was highly expressed in cancer and participated in macrophage recruitment and microenvironment regulation by activating Ca2+-triggered signal transduction. In terms of mechanism, CamK-A activated Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase PNCK, which in turn phosphorylated IκBα and activated calcium-dependent nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). The expression of CamK-A was coordinated with the activation of the CaMK-NF-κB axis. This pathway led to the recruitment of macrophages and angiogenesis. Moreover, CamK-A can affect cancer development. Clinically, the high expression of CamK-A was associated with poor prognosis, indicating that it can be used as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target (92).

Considering M1-type macrophages inhibit tumor growth, the roles of lncRNAs in M1 polarization have been appreciated. FOX protein is a transcription factor with a highly conserved sequence, which can facilitate macrophages to release inflammatory factors, cause M1 polarization, and achieve the anti-tumor effect. In one study, lncRNA ANCR was reported to target FoxO1 and inhibit the expression of FoxO1 by promoting ubiquitination and degradation of FoxO1. The overexpression of lncRNA ANCR can inhibit the polarization of M1 type, thereby further promoting the invasion and migration of cancer cells (93). Furthermore, in another study, lncRNA fetal-lethal non-coding developmental regulatory RNA (FENDRR) was associated with M1 macrophages. Overexpression of FENDRR facilitated M1 macrophage polarization, while knockdown of FENDRR down-regulated M1 type (94).

TAM has an M2-like effect and can promote tumor development and angiogenesis. Studies have revealed the connection between lncRNAs and M2 polarization. Previous studies have reported that lncRNAs can act as ceRNA to protect the target mRNAs expression, keep miRNAs away from mRNAs, or via extracellular vesicles (EVs) pathways to regulate M2-like polarization (18, 95). For example, cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4 (CPEB4) has been identified as related to M2-Like polarization. LncRNA RP11-361F15.2 acted as ceRNA to sponge miR-30c-5p, thereby binding and activating CPEB4, increasing osteosarcoma progression and metastasis (96). Also, in another study, LINC00662 competitively bound to miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-107 to upregulated WNT3A expression thus activated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in macrophages and further promoted M2 polarization and tumor progression (97). Exosomes are small membrane-bound vesicular particles participating in intercellular communication and regulation (98). LncRNAs can be packaged into the vesicles. Studies have found that the exosome derived from macrophages can influence the development of disease by carrying lncRNAs. LncRNA RPPH1 overexpression was associated with promoting colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis. CRC cell-derived exosomes can transport RPPH1 to macrophages, thereby mediating M2 polarization (99). Furthermore, M2 macrophages is also involved in the angiogenesis, aggressiveness, and metastasis of cancer. For example, the upregulation of prostate cancer-related transcript 6 (PCAT6) accelerated angiogenesis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PCAT6 upregulated the expression of VEGFR2 through the ceRNA model and then promoted angiogenesis through the VEGFR/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. In addition, PCAT6 combined with the deubiquitinating enzyme USP14 to induce deubiquitination of VEGFR2, which also promoted angiogenesis (100). The long non-coding RNA H19 induced by macrophages activated the miR-193b/MAPK1 pathway, thereby promoting the aggressiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma (101). Besides the above, M2 macrophages can secrete epidermal growth factor (EGF) to suppress lncRNA inhibiting metastasis (LIMT) expression through the EGFR-ERK axis, thus promoting ovarian cancer metastasis (102).

M1-M2 conversion is another hot spot of concern. LncRNA X inactivation specific transcript (XIST) was reported associated with M1-M2 polarization. The absence of XIST increased the secretion of exosomes miRNA-503, which can induce M1-M2 polarization of microglia, thereby upregulating immunosuppressive cytokines, inhibiting T cell proliferation, then accelerating primary tumor growth and metastasis (103). In another study, the knockdown of XIST induced the conversion of M1 to M2 by inhibiting the expression of enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) α and Kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF6), thereby promoting the proliferation and migration of tumor cells (104).

All these studies have shown a close connection between lncRNAs and the differentiation, recruitment, and polarization of macrophages. At the same time, their interaction may affect the occurrence, development, invasion, metastasis, and vascularization of tumors. A deep understanding of these relationships is significant for exploring the biomarkers, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.

5.1.3 LncRNAs and Natural Killer Cells

NK cells are the body’s first line of defense against cancer cells and virus infections. They can directly kill tumor cells non-specifically. This natural killing activity does not require antigen sensitization nor antibody participation, and there is no MHC restriction. In addition to having a powerful killing function, it also has immune regulation function, interacting with other immune cells in the body and regulating their immune state and immune function. Clinical studies have found that NK cell adoptive immunotherapy has good application prospects for malignant tumors (105–108). At present, it is believed that NK cells mainly exert their killing effect through the following ways. Firstly, NK cells directly release cytotoxic particles such as perforin and granzyme through exocytosis and activate the caspase pathway to induce target cell apoptosis (109). Cells express a series of stimulating and inhibiting receptors, and subsequent reactions occur after being combined with specific ligands (such as PD1-PDL1, NKG2-HLA, CD28H-B7H7, and DNAM1-CD155). The expression levels of tumor ligands and NK cell receptors determine whether NK cells will kill tumor cells (110). Also, the cytokine-mediated killing effect is essential. NK cells can synthesize and secrete various cytokines, such as IFNγ, TNFα, IL1, IL5, IL8, IL10, and GCSF (109). For example, secreted interferon-γ (IFNγ) can increase the expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I in tumor cells, thereby enhancing the presentation of tumor antigens to T cells and exerting the killing effect of T cells (105). The NK cells infiltration in the TME is related to a good prognosis, showing the potential in malignancies treatment (111). However, an accumulation of tumor-derived inhibitory molecules such as adenosine and lactate may limit NK cell functionality in the immunosuppressive TME (112).

Nowadays, increasing studies have focused on the role of lncRNAs in NK cells development, differentiation stages, and the relevance in regulating cancer immunity (113). Lnc-CD56 was reported to regulate CD56 and affect NK cells’ maturity positively. Lnc-CD56 can interact with the transcription factors such as TBX21, IRF2, IKZF2, ELF4, and EOMES of the NK cells. Then the CD56 expression and NK cell development were promoted. While knockdown lnc-CD56 down-regulated CD56 transcription and reduced mature CD56+ NK cells (114–116).

In addition, the cytotoxic activity of NK cells can also be regulated by long non-coding RNA. Death receptors (DRs) DR5 is an essential inhibitor of immune tolerance and able to enhance the cytotoxicity of NK cells. Increasing expression of DR5 can be achieved by overexpression of RUNX3 (117). Furthermore, the up-regulation of RUNX3 can be achieved by LINC00657 down-regulating miR-20a-5p. Therefore, LINC00657 can enhance the cytotoxicity of NK cells to cervical cancer cells through miR-20a-5p/RUNX3/DR5 axis to inhibit tumor proliferation and metastasis (118). Moreover, lncRNAs can regulate cytokines secretion, which also contributes to the killing effect of NK cells (119). IFN-γ secretion was associated with the increased cytotoxicity of NK cells. In a study, overexpression of lncGAS5 can increase IFN-γ secretion through the miR-544/RUNX3 axis. LncRNA GAS5 up-regulated the expression of RUNX3 by negatively regulating miR-544, thereby promoting the secretion of IFN-γ and enhancing the killing effect of NK (120). Similar in another study, GAS5 promoted the secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α by regulating miR-18a, thereby enhancing the killing effect of NK cells on gastric cancer (GC) (121). NK cells are essential in enhancing immune function and inhibiting immune escape. Taking full advantage of the immune function of NK cells to kill tumors is a hot research area. Considering the critical impact of lncRNAs on the function of NK cells, strategies based on lncRNAs may guide anti-tumor therapies.

5.1.4 LncRNAs and Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells are the body’s most potent antigen-presenting cells, derived from Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSC). Dendritic cells are responsible for recognizing danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). They can efficiently ingest, process, and present antigens. DCs are the central link of initiating and regulating immune response (122, 123). The main task of dendritic cells is to carry tumor antigens and present them to T cells to activate the anti-tumor function (124). In addition, dendritic cells can also stimulate the proliferation and maturation of B lymphocytes, stimulate the activation of Th cells and NK cells, and activate the immune functions in various ways. After dendritic cells take up tumor antigens, they are delivered to CTLs (cytotoxic T lymphocytes) via MHC-I or MHC-II pathways. At the same time, a set of costimulatory signals are provided, such as B7/CD28, IFA-3/CD2, ICAM-1/IFA-1, which fully activate CTL and produce an anti-tumor immune response (125–127). Moreover, DC can induce the differentiation and maturation of NK cells. And also, NK cells can induce the maturation of immature DCs. Activated NK cells are the first line of defense for human immunity (128). DC cells act as the commander-in-chief during the entire immune process. DCs mobilize other immune cells in the body to perform tumor-killing functions, which is conducive to tumor clearance. LncRNAs have been reported to participate in the antigen presentation and pathogen-response pathways, playing a role in DCs differentiation, migration, and function.

LncRNAs have been reported to be related to the differentiation of DCs. Knockout of lnc-DC interfered with DC differentiation and affected the activation and function of T cells. Lnc-DC regulated this series of responses by activating the transcription factor STAT3. Lnc-DC directly interacted with STAT3 to promote phosphorylation of STAT3 on Tyrosine 705, by preventing STAT3 from binding to SHP1 and dephosphorylation of SHP1 (129). Moreover, as another research announced, the overexpression of lnc-DCs led to the over-maturation of dendritic cells and increased activation of Th1 cells. What’s more, lncRNAs regulated monocyte/dendritic cell differentiation (130). LncRNA HOTAIRM1 and miR-3960 affected the expression of myeloid differentiation-related HOXA genes. It formed a ceRNA network, which acted as a negative regulator of DC differentiation, enabling cells to maintain the monocyte phenotype without transforming into DCs (131).

The glycolytic metabolism and migration ability of DCs were also regulated by lncRNAs. The lnc-Dpf3 directly interacted with HIF-1α and inhibited the transcription of the HIF-1α-dependent glycolytic gene Ldha. Thereby DC glycolytic metabolism and migration ability were suppressed (132). In another study, LINC00665 overexpression was reported to correlate with a low infiltration level of DCs (133).

Moreover, previous results showed that lncRNAs could regulate DCs immune tolerance. Tolerogenic dendritic cells (tol-DCs) played an indispensable role in immune tolerance. LncRNA NEAT1 regulated the tolerogenic phenotype expression of DCs via the NEAT1/miR-3076-3p axis. Mechanistically, as a ceRNA, NEAT1 sponged miR-3076-3p to modulate the inflammasome NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3). NLRP3 was a key player in inflammation and associated with the activation of tol-DCs (134). These works have identified the roles of lncRNAs in regulating antigen presentation and DCs. Broadening the mechanisms of lncRNAs action and functions may provide new targets in novel strategies.

5.1.5 LncRNAs and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a type of heterogeneous cell derived from bone marrow precursor cells and immature myeloid cells (IMCs). Accumulation of MDSCs can promote tumorigenesis and tumor progression. They mediate tumor immune escape and promote tumor growth by inhibiting the function of effector T cells. Under normal circumstances, MDSCs are the precursors of DCs, macrophages, and granulocytes, quickly differentiating and entering the corresponding organs and tissues to exert normal immunity function. In tumor patients, immature precursor cells proliferate after MDSCs are stimulated by tumor-derived factors (TDFs). Then they inhibit the tumor-immune system and further promote the tumor development (135, 136). The main functional characteristic of MDSCs cells is their potent ability to suppress various types of immune responses (61). MDSCs have different differentiation potential and immunosuppressive abilities. MDSCs are mainly divided into two subgroups: monocytic-MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and granulocytic-MDSCs (G-MDSCs). M-MDSCs express ARG1 and iNOS to inhibit T cell effects by producing high nitric oxide. G-MDSCs mainly suppress the immune response in an antigen-specific manner and generate ROS (137, 138). Factors secreted by tumor cells and inflammatory cytokines produced by tumor stroma are the main signals leading to the accumulation of MDSCs. For example, stem cell factor (SCF), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), etc., stimulate the production and proliferation of MDSCs through the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Transcription factors such as STAT3, STAT5, and NOTCH are involved in this process. Moreover, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6, IL-1β, and CXCL1 mainly induce the inhibitory activity of MDSCs through NF-κB, STAT1, and STAT6 (139, 140). The roles of lncRNAs in the maturation, differentiation and function of MDSC have been studied.

LncRNAs can regulate the development of MDSC. Ficolin B (Fcnb) expression can be evaluated as a surrogate for the development of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) and is a predicted target gene of lncRNA F730016J06Rik (AK036396). Knockout of lncRNA AK036396 reduced the stability of Fcnb protein, which depended on the ubiquitin-proteasome system. LncRNA AK036396 inhibited the maturation of PMN-MDSCs and accelerated their immunosuppression by enhancing the stability of Fcnb protein (141).

LncRNAs can regulate the differentiation of MDSCs. Interleukin 4 induced gene 1 (IL4i1) played a vital role in the differentiation of monocytes/macrophages. Lnc-C/EBPβ interacted with C/EBPβ LIP and WDR5 to down-regulate IL4il, thereby affecting the differentiation of MDSCs (140). LncRNA RNCR3 acted as a competitive endogenous RNA to promote the differentiation of MDSCs and suppressive function through the RNCR3/miR-185-5p/Chop pathway (142).

In addition, lncRNAs also regulated the immunosuppressive ability of MDSCs. Studies have shown that knockdown of lncRNA Pvt1 reduced the levels of Arg1 and ROS in G-MDSC and partially restored the anti-tumor T cell response. LncRNA Pvt1 may be a potential therapeutic target for regulating the inhibitory function of G-MDSCs (143). LncRNA Olfr29-ps1 promoted the immunosuppressive function and differentiation of Mo-MDSCs by sponging miR-214-3p after modification with N6-methyladenosine (m6A). Moreover, lncRNA Olfr29-ps1 can be upregulated by IL6, which can be a potential anti-tumor target (144).

In short, MDSCs are critical immunosuppressive cells in the tumor immune microenvironment. MDSCs suppress the body’s immune cells through various channels, weaken the body’s killing effect on tumor cells, and contribute to the occurrence and development of tumors. Therefore, in-depth research and corresponding clinical practice of the interactions between lncRNAs and MDSCs still require more remarkable progress in the prevention of tumor immune escape.

5.2 LncRNAs and Adoptive Immune Cells in TIME

5.2.1 LncRNAs and T Cells

T lymphocytes are the main components of lymphocytes involved in adaptive immunity (Figure 3) (145). T cells have various subgroups and play different immunomodulatory effects. Cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) secrete perforin and granzyme to kill infected and mutant cells (146). T-helper (Th) cells have many classifications and various functions. For example, Th1 cells secrete IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, and LN-α, which mediate the activation of macrophages and kill intracellular pathogens. Th1 cells play a crucial role in the anti-tumor immune response, while Th2 cells play an anti-Th1 cells role and promote tumor cell proliferation (147–149). Regulatory T cells (Treg) are an immunosuppressive subgroup of CD4+ T cells, which impair the immune monitoring against cancer and lead to tumor progression (39). Central memory T cells (Tcm) and effector memory T cells (Tem) are two main subtypes of memory T cells (Tm). Tcm can proliferate and differentiate into effector T cells when stimulated by antigens; the Tem can produce cytokines when stimulated by antigens (150). Activated natural killer T cell (NKT) is a T cell subgroup with T cell receptor (TCR) and NK cell receptor on the cell surface. They can quickly respond to antigen stimulation, produce multiple cytokines and chemokines, and have cytotoxic activity (151). LncRNAs have been revealed to participate in T cells’ development, activation, differentiation, function, and cancer immunology.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 LncRNA and adaptive immune cells in TIME. In the TIME, lncRNA can regulate adaptive immune cells to interact with tumor cells. T cells and B cells are the main adaptive immune cells. T cells play different immunomodulatory effects depending the various subgroups. Cytotoxic T cells have the tumor killing abilities and Treg cells play an immunosuppressive role. LncRNA has been revealed to participate in adaptive immune cells’ development, activation, differentiation, function, and cancer immunology. Created with BioRender.com.

Cytotoxic T cells can specifically kill tumor cells and play an essential role in anti-tumor immunity. However, the tumor microenvironment can induce CD8+ T cells to increase the expression of the inhibitory receptor PD-1. After binding to the ligand PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells, it significantly inhibits the ability of CD8+ CTL to eliminate tumor cells. Numerous basic investigations and clinical experiments have proved that anti-PD-1 or anti-PDL-1 methods can significantly enhance the body’s efficiency in removing tumors (53, 152, 153). For example, the expression of PD-L1 was upregulated by tumor IFN signals so that the immune surveillance function mediated by T cells was suppressed. Silencing long non-coding RNA IFN-stimulated non-coding RNA 1 (INCR1) controlled IFNγ by reducing the expression of PD-L1, JAK2, and several other IFNγ-stimulating genes. INCR1 knockdown made tumor cells more sensitive to cytotoxic T cell-mediated killing (154). TIM-3 (T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3) is a type of T cell surface inhibitory molecule that can cause T cell death during cancer infection (155). Lnc-Tim3 has shown a regulatory role in CD8 T exhaustion. Mechanistically, lnc-Tim3 specifically interacted with Tim3 to suppress Tim-3–Bat3 signaling and downstream signaling pathway NFAT1 and AP-1 in CD8 T cells, leading to CD8+ T exhaustion (156, 157). In another study, the regulatory role of lncRNA NEAT1 in T cell function was also reported. Via the miR-155/Tim-3 pathway, repression of NEAT1 down-regulated the CD8+T cell apoptosis and enhanced the anti-tumor effects of T cells (158). Activation-induced cell death (AICD) is another major type of programmed death of T lymphocytes. After normal T lymphocytes are stimulated by invading antigens, T lymphocytes are activated and induce a series of immune responses. In order to prevent excessive immune response or prevent this immune response from developing indefinitely, AICD is used to control the lifespan of activated T cells. AICD can be used by cancer to avoid immune destruction. The association between lncRNA and AICD of T lymphocytes has also been reported. CTLs and TH1 were sensitive to AICD in breast and lung cancer. LncRNA NKILA regulated T cell sensitivity to AICD by inhibiting NF-κB activity. Knockdown of NKILA increased CTL infiltration and suppressed breast cancer progression (159).

The differentiation of Th cells can be regulated by lncRNAs. MALAT1 interacted with miR-155 as ceRNA and down-regulated the expression of miR-155 in CD4+ T cells. The ratio of Th1/Th 2 was adjusted through this pathway. Up-regulation of MALAT1 produced more Th2-type cytokines while inhibiting the release of Th1-type cytokines (160). Th17 cells are a newly discovered CD4+T cell subgroup associated with anti-tumor activities. The Th17 cell subgroup can theoretically make up for the deficiency of the Th1/Th2 mediated immune response mechanism in the human body. Treg cells that mediate immune tolerance and Th17 cells that mediate inflammatory response are in a state of resistance in function and differentiation (161). The process of CD4+ T cell differentiation into Th17 cells can be affected by lncRNA NEAT1. Knockdown of NEAT1 inhibited Th17/CD4+ T cell differentiation by reducing the level of STAT3 protein (162).

In the tumor microenvironment, T cells can induce and differentiate into regulatory T cells (Tregs). Different from Th17 cells, Tregs have an immunosuppressive function. They can inhibit the anti-tumor immunity of immune effector cells such as CD4+ T cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, NK cells, DC, and other immune cells through various mechanisms to promote tumorigenesis and tumor development. Tregs are a critical factor in tumor immune escape and play a vital role in tumor immune regulation (163). Long non-coding RNAs have been involved in regulating the differentiation and function of Tregs. Lnc-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), specifically bound to EGFR, blocked its interaction with c-CBL and c-CBL ubiquitination, upregulated its downstream AP-1/NF-AT1 axis, and then triggered EGFR Expression to promote Treg differentiation and HCC progression (164). In another report, exosomes (TDEs) derived from breast tumor cells can induce CD73+γδ1 Treg cells through the SNHG16/miR-16-5p/SMAD5 regulatory axis. LncRNA SNHG16 sponged miR-16-5p, suppressed the target gene SMAD5, and enhanced the TGF-β1/SMAD5 pathway, thereby upregulating the expression of CD73 in Vδ1 T cells (165). LncRNA fetal-lethal non-coding developmental regulatory RNA (FENDRR) upregulated growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible beta protein (GADD45B) through sponge miR-423-5p to inhibit Treg-mediated immune escape of HCC cells (166). Although removing Treg cells can enhance the anti-tumor immune response, it may also trigger autoimmunity at the same time. A vital issue of cancer immunotherapy for Treg is to specifically deplete Treg cells infiltrating into tumor tissues while suppressing auto-immunity without affecting the anti-tumor effect of immune cells. Also, the functional balance between Th17 cells and Tregs is critical and can be an essential part of regulating immunity and cancer (39, 167).

The activation of NKT cells was also related to lncRNAs. LINC00240 overexpression inhibited the cytotoxic activity of NKT cells by the miR-124-3p/STAT3/MICA axis and enhanced the growth, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer cells (168). In summary, T cells play a critical part in immune responses and cancer development. T cells have a big family, and their functions vary from one to another. LncRNAs participate in the development and biological process of T cells. Therefore, exploring the intercommunications between the T cells and lncRNAs facilitate the regulation of cancer immunity and investigates the potential therapies of cancer.

5.2.2 LncRNAs and B Cells

In the past research, the roles of T cells in tumor immunity have been extensively studied, while the research on B cells is relatively rare. B lymphocytes are derived from pluripotent stem cells. Stimulated by the antigens, B cells can differentiate into plasma cells. The plasma cells infiltrate the tumor site and produce various cytokines and antibodies, which participate in anti-tumor immunity via ADCC, phagocytosis, and complement activation. In addition, B cells can also drive antigens to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to facilitate antigen-specific immune response (169, 170). In recent years, the role of lncRNAs in B cells development and differentiation, as well as B cell-derived malignant tumors such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B lymphocytic leukemia, have been discussed (171). Some lncRNAs have shown potential as therapeutic targets (Figure 3).

LncRNAs are related to B cells development. Mitotic cell cycle-related genes of B cells such as KIF23, PLK4, and CENPE associated with the lncRNAs OIP5-AS, MME-AS1, and the bidirectional lncRNA CRNDE (172–174). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a type of tumor composed of medium to large B lymphoid cells. LncRNAs were reported to regulate the immune evasion of the tumor. Small nucleolar RNA host gene 14 (SNHG14) acted as a ceRNA to sponge miR-5590-3p, then increased the expression of Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and induced PD1/PD-L1 activities. The SNHG14/miR-5590-3p/ZEB1 pathway facilitated the immune evasion of DLBCL cells and the progression of DLBCL. This study indicated that targeting lncRNAs may be potential immunotherapy in DLBCL (175). There were also examples of lncRNAs and DLBCL related to MYC. MYC proto-oncogene was upstream of lncRNA functional intergenic repeating RNA element (FIRRE). The lncRNA FIRRE promoted cell proliferation and reduced cell apoptosis in DLBCL via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, promoting DLBCL development (176). The balance between the B-cell precursors’ proliferation and apoptosis contributed to B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Although the specific mechanism has not been clarified, lncRNAs were reported to affect tumor development. Long non-coding RNA colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (LncRNA CRNDE) increased the expression of cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) via sponging miR-345-5p. Then the BCP-ALL cell proliferation was promoted, and cell apoptosis was downregulated (177). In another study, the anti-tumor roles of lncRNAs were revealed. LncRNA GAS5 overexpression sponged miR222. B lymphocytic leukemia cells were arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, the cell proliferation and invasion of B lymphocytic leukemia was inhabited, and cell apoptosis was promoted (178). These studies showed that lncRNA expression was related to B cells and B cell-derived tumors development. The function of lncRNAs deserve further studies and may become potential clinical therapies.

5.3 LncRNAs and Stromal Cells in TIME

5.3.1 LncRNAs and Cancer Stem Cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) refer to cancer cells with the properties of stem cells, which have the ability to self-renewal and differentiate. As for the origin, it has not yet been elucidated. Some normal tissue stem cells or progenitor cells may undergo oncogenic transformation to produce CSCs (179). The current view believes that CSCs have the following characteristics: (a) exist in the primary tumor; (b) can maintain self-renewal through asymmetric cell division; (c) can continuously proliferate and differentiate. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CSC allows cancer cells to spread and metastasize from the primary tumor; (d) resistance to therapy (180, 181). In addition, increasing researches have confirmed the associations between CSCs and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, including TAMs, DCs, T cells, and MDSCs. For example, CSCs secrete cytokines and chemokines, including CCL2, CCL5, CSF1, GDF15, IL-13, TGFβ, and Wnt-induced signaling protein 1 (WISP1), to recruit and polarize TAMs (182–184). CSCs can also reduce the anti-tumor effects of DCs by restricting their transport, preventing their maturation, and inducing the differentiation of tolerance subtypes (184, 185). Moreover, CSCs can directly interact with T cells. CSC partly reduces AKT and ERK signal transduction by releasing related extracellular vesicles or free tenascin C (TNC) to escape from anti-tumor T cells but induce tumor-promoting regulatory Tregs (184, 186). In addition, the interaction between CSCs and MDSCs in TME was also reported. CSCs can secrete soluble factors and exosomes to promote the MDSCs infiltration, expansion, and activation (184, 187). LncRNAs are involved in regulating the self-renewal and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CSC.

LncRNAs can modulate the CSC self-renewal function. For example, lncRNA HAND2-AS1 has reported high expression in liver CSCs. Mechanistically, HAND2-AS1 recruited the INO80 chromatin-remodeling complex to the promoter of BMPR1A to induce the expression of BMP signaling. Thereby the self-renewal of CSCs and tumorigenesis were promoted. Knockdown of lncRNA HAND2-AS1 provided a potential target for HCC therapy (188). In another study, the role of lncTCF7 in promoting CSCs self-renewal has also been reported. Different from the above mechanism, lncTCF7 recruited the SWI/SNF complex to the promoter of TCF7 to induce Wnt signaling expression (189). Moreover, lncRNAs participate in the EMT of CSCs, which promotes tumor metastasis. Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP was associated with the EMT of pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSCs), suggesting a potential therapeutic target. Mechanistically, via HOTTIP/WDR5/HOXA9/Wnt axis, HOTTIP affected stemness, including sphericity, tumorigenesis, stem factors (LIN28, NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2), and markers (ALDH1, CD44, and CD133) (190). In another study, lncRNA H19 and miR-675 participated in enriching the CSC pool, facilitating stemness properties of breast cancer cells and tumor migration (191). HCC-associated mesenchymal stem cells (HCC-MSC) have contributed to EMT, and lncRNAs have participated in these processes. LncRNA-MUF was an MSC-upregulated factor, and the overexpression lncRNA-MUF could accelerate EMT and malignant capacity. Mechanistically, lncRNA-MUF interacted with Annexin A2 (ANXA2) to induce Wnt/β-catenin signaling expression and EMT process. Moreover, lncRNA-MUF also acted as a ceRNA for miR-34a to upregulate Snail1 and promote EMT. Depleting lncRNA-MUF suppressed EMT, and this lncRNA-mediated process was a potential method for therapeutic targeting (192).

5.3.2 LncRNAs and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the core components of TME, playing an essential role in the occurrence and development of tumors. CAFs are mainly derived from fibroblasts or stellate cells in the pancreas and liver tissues (193). Stimulation including TGF-β family ligands, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), IL-1, and IL-6 can activate fibroblasts to become CAFs (194). The role of CAF is mainly to promote tumors, but in some cases, also to inhibit tumors (195, 196). CAFs can regulate blood vessel formation, immune response, tumor progression, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy via remodeling of ECM and secreting growth factors. They can reshape the ECM structure through the application of cross-linking enzymes, proteases, and forces. This may lead to the tracking of collagen, which can accelerate the migration of cancer cells. Another situation of changing ECM is that CAFs can generate high pressure and interstitial pressure to prevent treatment delivery, thereby hindering the effect of cancer treatment and compressing blood vessels. Besides, CAFs can also resist treatment by secreting soluble mediators. VEGF and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) can regulate angiogenesis (193, 197). Moreover, by cytokine production and surface molecules, CAF can regulate immunity, including macrophage recruitment, T cells immune response, and DCs anti-tumor immunity (198). LncRNAs can regulate CAF activation, tumor progression, and chemoresistance.

LncRNAs participated in the reprogramming process of normal fibroblasts (NFs) into CAFs. LncRNA Gm26809 was delivered by melanoma cell B16F0-derived exosomes into NIH/3T3 cells to reprogram fibroblast NIH/3T3 into tumor-promoting CAFs. The proliferation and migration of melanoma cells were promoted. Moreover, the knockdown of Gm26809 reduced pro-tumor effect (199). In another study, lnc-CAF facilitated squamous cell carcinoma progression by reprogramming NFs into CAFs through lnc-CAF/IL-33 pathway. In this process, lnc-CAF increased the expression of IL-33 and inhabited p62-dependent autophagy-lysosome degradation of IL-33. A high level of lnc-CAF was related to tumor development. While lnc-CAF knockdown downregulated Ki-67 and α-SMA+ CAF expression, limited the tumor growth (200).

The long noncoding RNAs have been regarded as nodal drivers of metastatic progression mediated by CAFs. The role of LINC00092 in ovarian cancer aggressiveness has been demonstrated. LINC00092 interacted with a glycolytic enzyme named 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 2 (PFKFB2) to modulate glycolysis levels and supportive function of CAFs, thereby facilitating ovarian cancer metastasis (201). In addition, the exosomal LINC00659 transferred from CAFs were revealed to bind miR-342-3p and then upregulate ANXA2 expression. The proliferation, EMT, and migration of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells have been promoted (202).

The crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells was associated with chemoresistance and lncRNAs participated in some of the processes. CAFs delivered exosomal lncRNA H19 to act as a ceRNA sponging miR-141 and then activated the β-catenin pathway. MiR-141 had an inhibitory effect on the stemness of CRC cells. Through the lncRNA H19 pathway, the stemness and chemoresistance of CRC were facilitated (203). Also, in another study, lncRNA CCAL was demonstrated to contribute to tumor chemoresistance. Exosomes delivered lncRNA CCAL from CAFs to the cancer cells. Then it bound to mRNA stabilizing protein HuR (human antigen R) to increase β-catenin mRNA and protein levels. The CRC cell apoptosis was suppressed, and the oxaliplatin (Oxa) resistance was promoted (204). These findings indicated that lncRNAs were involved the biological activities of CAFs. Moreover, lncRNAs have the potential to be the target for chemoresistance.

5.3.3 LncRNAs and Endothelial Cells

Vascular endothelial cells (EC) can complete the metabolic exchange of plasma and tissue fluid, synthesize various biologically active substances for tissue development, and act as antigen-presenting cells to participate in immune activities (205, 206). The newly formed blood vessels can supply nutrients for the growing primary tumor. Meanwhile, the tumor cells synthesize and release various substances to accelerate angiogenesis, facilitating tumor progression (207, 208). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) acts as a mitogen and pro-angiogenic factor, promoting endothelial cell proliferation, increasing vascular permeability, and promoting endothelial cells to express PA, PAI, interstitial collagenase, and thrombin activity. Tumor angiogenesis, development, and metastases can be facilitated (209–211). LncRNAs can regulate angiogenesis by directly regulating endothelial cells’ development, differentiation, proliferation, migration, autophagy, and apoptosis. Also, the VEGF can be regulated to manage angiogenesis.

Long noncoding RNA SENCR contributed to the differentiation from pluripotent cells to the endothelial. The proliferation, angiogenic capacity, and migration ability of human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) were associated with the expression of SENCR (212). In another study, the regulatory role of lncRNA MALAT1 in endothelial function and vessel growth has been demonstrated. Inhibiting lncRNA MALAT1 facilitated endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (213). In another study, lncRNA was revealed to protect endothelial function via DNA damage response (DDR). LncRNA maternally expressed gene 3 (Meg3) interacted with the RNA binding protein polypyrimidine tract binding protein 3 (PTBP3) and activated p53 signaling. This pathway played a vital role in the cell apoptosis and cell proliferation triggered by the DDR. Endothelial homeostasis can be regulated through this pathway, which could be targeted in future therapies (214). What is more, lncRNA TGFB2-OT1 (TGFB2 overlapping transcript 1) derived from the 3’UTR of TGFB2 can regulate autophagy of ECs. As a ceRNA, TGFB2-OT1 sponged MIR3960, MIR4488 and MIR4459, to affect the miRNA targets CERS1 (ceramide synthase 1), NAT8L (N-acetyltransferase 8-like [GCN5-related, putative]), and LARP1 (La ribonucleoprotein domain family, member 1). CERS1 and NAT8L were involved in autophagy via regulating mitochondrial function. TGFB2-OT1 upregulated the expression of LARP1, which increased the SQSTM1 (sequestosome 1) level, NFKB RELA and CASP1 functions, and the secretion of IL6, IL8, and IL1B in VECs (215). Moreover, VEGFA expression can be upregulated by lncRNA LINC00173.v1 in squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) tissues. Suppression LINC00173.v1 downregulated the vascular endothelial cells proliferation and the SQC tumorigenesis. Mechanistically, LINC00173.v1 upregulated the VEGFA level via interacting with miR-511-5p. Adopting the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) method to inhabit LINC00173.v1 was a potential strategy to limit SQC progression and upregulated the therapeutic sensitivity of SQC (216).

5.3.4 LncRNAs and Cytokines in TIME

Cytokines are small molecular proteins synthesized and secreted by immune cells (such as monocytes, macrophages, T cells, B cells, NK cells, etc.) and specific non-immune cells (endothelial cells, epidermal cells, fibroblasts, etc.). Cytokines can be divided into transforming growth factor-β family (TGF-β), interleukin (IL), interferon (IFN), chemokine family, etc. They can mediate the interaction between cells and have a variety of biological functions in regulating the tumor microenvironment (217, 218).

TGF-β is a crucial immunosuppressive cytokine. TGF-β can regulate the production and function of a variety of immune cells. It controls the innate immune system by inhibiting NK cells and regulating macrophages and neutrophils to form a negative immune input. It also promotes the expansion of Treg cells, inhibits the generation and function of antigen-presenting dendritic cells and effector T cells, and directly regulates adaptive immunity (219, 220). The TGF-β signaling pathway and lncRNA network play a vital role in EMT cancer development (221). In one study, TGF-β activated the Smad pathway to participate in EMT. LncRNA EMT-associated lncRNA induced by TGFβ1 (ELIT-1) increased the TGFβ/Smad3 signaling and TGFβ target genes expression, including Snail (a transcription factor critical for EMT), via developing a positive feedback loop. Eventually, lncRNA ELIT-1 facilitated EMT and cancer progression (222). In another study, TGF-β interacted with LncRNA-ATB to promote EMT and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. LncRNA-ATB sponged miR-200 family to increase expression of ZEB1 and ZEB2. In addition, lncRNA-ATB supported organ colonization of tumor cells by autocrine induction of IL-11 and activating STAT3 signaling. These findings suggested that lncRNA-ATB had the potential to be the target for cancer therapy (223). Another study recognized that TGF-β induced lncRNA AC026904.1 and UCA1 were closely correlated to poor prognosis. AC026904.1 was an enhancer RNA in the nucleus, and UCA1 acted as ceRNA in the cytoplasm. These two lncRNAs cooperated to increase the level of Slug, playing critical roles in TGF-β-induced EMT (224). Moreover, accumulating evidence suggested that TGF-β-induced EMT is NF-κB-dependent. Repression of NF-κB signaling downregulated TGF-β-induced EMT. LncRNA NKILA was upregulated by TGF-β and participated in the negative feedback loop of the NF-κB pathway. Overexpression of NKILA suppressed EMT and tumor metastasis, which may serve as a therapeutic target (225).

IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine expressed and distributed in a variety of cells. It regulates inflammation and cellular immune response and plays a role in tumor metabolism by activating various carcinogenic pathways (217). IL-6 is overexpressed in a variety of cancer cells, and cancer cells rely extensively on IL-6 signal transduction. IL-6 activates signal transducers and activators of transduction-3 (STAT3) to affect tumor-infiltrating immune cells, stimulate downstream target genes to protect tumor cells from apoptosis, facilitate tumor cell proliferation, upregulate tumor angiogenesis and drug resistance (226). For example, the oncogenic roles of IL-6/STAT3 signaling and lncRNAs have been demonstrated. Patients were exhibiting unsatisfying responses to sorafenib therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. LncRNA-SRLR (sorafenib resistance-associated lncRNA in RCC) was found upregulated in sorafenib-resistant RCCs. Mechanistically, lncRNA-SRLR interacted with NF-κB and enhanced IL-6 transcription, activating STAT3 and promoting sorafenib tolerance (227). However, there were anti-tumor lncRNAs negatively regulating IL-6/STAT3 signaling. Long noncoding RNA on chromosome 8p12 (termed TSLNC8) was frequently deleted in HCC. TSLNC8 was able to competitively bind with transketolase and STAT3, regulate the STAT3-Tyr705 and STAT3-Ser727 phosphorylation expression, repressing the IL-6-STAT3 signaling pathway and suppressing HCC progression and metastasis (228). Lnc-DILC also inhibited IL-6/STAT3 signaling. Mechanistically, lnc-DILC mediates the crosstalk between TNF-α/NF-κB signaling and autocrine IL-6/STAT3 cascade and connects hepatic inflammation with LCSC expansion, suggesting that lnc-DILC could be a potential prognostic biomarker and possible therapeutic target against LCSCs (229).

Interferons (IFNs) have an excellent inhibitory effect on the growth of a variety of tumors. The anti-tumor mechanism of interferon-alpha is to exert its cellular activity by binding to specific membrane receptors. Once the IFN is attached to the cell membrane, it conducts signal transduction through IFNAR1, and IFNAR2, triggering a series of intracellular processes, such as activating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, to inhibit cancer cell proliferation, and regulate the function of the immune system (230). LncRNA IRF1-AS (Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 Antisense RNA) was an IFN-inducible nuclear lncRNA reported to repressed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) progression by promoting IFN response through a positive regulatory loop with IRF1 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 1). Mechanistically, IFNs upregulated IRF1-AS via the JAK-STAT pathway. IRF1-AS activates IRF1 transcription through interacting with ILF3 (Interleukin Enhancer Binding Factor 3) and DHX9 (DExH-Box Helicase 9) (231). Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is essential for the innate immune response. Mechanistically, Sros1 blocked the binding of Stat1 mRNA to the RBP CAPRIN1, stabilizing the Stat1 mRNA and promoting IFN-γ-mediated activation of innate immune responses (232). Mineo et al. found that tumor IFN signal upregulated PD-L1 level to suppress T cell-mediated immune surveillance. Silencing lncRNA INCR1 reduced the function of PD-L1, JAK2, and IFNγ-stimulated genes. In addition, knocking out INCR1 made tumor cells susceptible to the killing effect of T cells, thereby making improvements in CAR-T (154).

CCL18 is mainly produced by innate immune cells, including dendritic cells, monocytes, and macrophages. CCL18 attracts naive T cells, regulatory T cells, Th2 cells, immunosuppressive and immature dendritic cells, and effector B cells. The expression of CCL18 was positively associated with HOTAIR and promoted tumor progression. Mechanistically, HOTAIR acted as a ceRNA for miR-130a-5p to derepress ZEB1, promoting EMT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). CCL18 facilitated cancer development by upregulating HOTAIR expression, providing a potential new therapeutic target for cancer diagnosis and treatment (233).

6 Potential Applications for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

LncRNAs have the characteristics of tissue-specific expression, and the differentially expressed lncRNAs can be used as cancer biomarkers. Moreover, lncRNAs remain relatively stable in circulating body fluids, which makes non-invasive detection possible. The detection of lncRNAs is also expected to bring more information than DNA detection. In addition, from a pharmaceutical perspective, long non-coding RNAs are also attractive targets because they can directly regulate disease-related gene expression. All in all, lncRNAs are closely related to tumorigenesis, tumor development, and metastasis. It is promising as a potential biomarker for tumor diagnosis and novel target for tumor treatment (Figure 4) (234, 235).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Potential applications for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Various findings demonstrated the importance and value of long non-coding RNAs. Studies highlighted the potential of lncRNA in biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and targets for cancer therapy. Created with BioRender.com.

Biomarker includes various objective indications or medical signs which can be measured accurately and reproducibly. A prognostic biomarker influences the clinical outcome (236). Recent studies have shown that the abnormal expression of MALAT1 in tumor tissues and body fluids can be used as a biomarker for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. MALAT1 regulates various molecular signaling pathways, such as MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, WNT/β-catenin, and NF-kB, to participate in immune response, angiogenesis and tumor progression (237). SNHG15 serves as an oncogenic regulator in cancer progression. The expression of SNHG15 was significantly related to the poor prognosis. SNHG15 functions as a ceRNA sponging miRNA in cancer, meditating oncogenic factors, thus ruling malignant phenotype and EMT. Studies have shown that SNHG15 participated in various signaling pathways essential for cancer, including EMT, WNT/β-catenin, NF-kb, and YAP-Hippo signaling pathways. SNHG15 may be a prospective and effective biomarker for cancer diagnosis (238).

LncRNAs-related immunotherapy has many advantages. Firstly, lncRNAs can regulate a series of downstream target genes by participating in various cell signaling pathways to regulate cancer treatment. In addition, the multiple regulatory sites of lncRNAs can interact with other molecules, which helps to develop new structure-based anticancer drugs (30). More importantly, as discussed before, lncRNAs played a crucial role in cancer immunology. They influenced many biological processes, including neutrophil recruitment, macrophage polarization, NK cells cytotoxicity, T cells functions, etc. The potential therapeutic applications of lncRNAs have attracted more and more attention.

Although various regulatory functions of lncRNAs have been revealed, one primary concern is how we can effectively and safely target these lncRNAs. Recently, studies have discussed the new technologies in lncRNA biology. According to the information from human genome sequencing and the base-pairing rules of Watson and Crick, it is possible to design therapeutic oligonucleotides (239–243). Arun et al. used antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) to systematically knock down Malat1, which slowed down tumor development in the mouse cancer model (244). RNA interference (RNAi) can silence lncRNA. Pichler et al. found that lncRNA FLANC induced angiogenesis through the STAT3/VEGFA pathway. Using nanoparticles that carry small interfering RNA to target FLANC can reduce angiogenesis. This may be a potential new type of cancer treatment (245). In addition, CRISPR/Cas9, as a newly discovered genome editing tool, Cas9 nuclease can delete the lncRNA gene or introduce RNA unstable elements into its locus (246). Zhu et al. introduced a method based on CRISPR/Cas9 utilizing paired-gRNAs (pgRNAs) to produce large-fragment deletions, which allowed the identification of functional lncRNAs in tumor cells (247). In another study, a CRISPR/Cas9 technology system named CERTIS (CRISPR-mediated Endogenous lncRNA Tracking and Immunoprecipitation System) was developed to visualize and separate endogenous lncRNA by precisely inserting an MS2 tag into the distal end of the lncRNA locus. By this method, lncRNA NEAT1 was effectively labeled and monitored for its endogenous expression variation (248).

In addition, recent advances revealed that regulation of the immune system and combined immunotherapies might be effective strategies (249, 250). For example, Li et al. identified a cancer immunogenic lncRNA named lncRNA inducing MHC-I, and immunogenicity of tumor (LIMIT) was involved in the MHC-I expression and T cells responses via LIMIT-GBP-HSF1 axis. LIMIT cis-activated the guanylate-binding protein (GBP) gene cluster, and GBPs disrupted the association between HSP90 and heat shock factor-1 (HSF1), thereby resulting in HSF1 activation and transcription of MHC-I (107). Immunotherapies such as Immune Checkpoint Blocking (ICB) and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy (CAR-T) have been gradually applied to tumor treatment (30, 251). In recent years, immune checkpoint-targeting drugs, such as CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 have been utilized for cancer immunotherapy (44). In one study, H3K27 acetylation activated two immune checkpoint molecules, PD-L1 and galectin-9. LncMX1–215 worked as a tumor suppressor molecule in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), showing its negative function in immunosuppression. Mechanistically, lncMX1–215 was bound to GCN5, a known H3K27 acetylase, to interference with the interaction with H3K27 acetylation (252). However, the application of (CAR)-T cells is limited due to poor tumor invasion, progression of failure, and insufficient antigen.

Another concern lies in the efficient delivery of lncRNAs. Although lncRNAs are attractive therapeutic targets, there are still some limitations. For example, the molecules can be rapidly degraded and cleared from circulation. Besides, the large size makes it difficult to pass through the cell membrane (253). Nowadays, various materials and approaches, including biomaterials, controlled release systems, and nanoparticles (254, 255). They also show the potential to deliver lncRNAs and target cells. For example, implantable biomaterials construct a structure to attract and reprogram DCs for immunotherapy. Ali et al. revealed that polymers had the potential to be structured for releasing cytokine, presenting cancer antigens, recruiting immune cells, and promoting immune responses (256, 257). There are also injectable biomaterials such as hydrogels, gelatin, and mesoporous silica micro rods. These materials are highly deformable and self-assembled without surgical implantation, creating a local immunogenic environment to recruit and activate immune cells. Ji et al. explored a hydrogel patch harboring LSD1 inhibitor and chemotherapy agent, which enhanced tumor immunogenicity and increased T-cell infiltration via epigenetic activation of innate immunity (258). This study revealed the broad applicability of epigenetic remodeling hydrogel patches, which also inspired the lncRNA-related strategies. Hori et al. developed a kind of alginate with rapid self-gelling property in vivo. This material was fabricated by the mixture of calcium-loaded alginate microspheres with soluble alginate solution and DCs. When the constructed material was injected into mice, the activated DCs in the alginate facilitated the recruit and immune responses of the T cells (259, 260). Nanoparticles have been adopted for the delivery of lncRNAs and targeting desired cells (261). Amita M Vaidya et al. developed RGD-PEG-ECO/siDANCR nanoparticles to facilitate delivery of siDANCR and then silence lncRNA DANCR, which was a therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The results showed prolonged DANCR silencing and suppressing TNBC proliferation in mice with no overt side-effects (262). In another study, due to the biocompatibility and biodegradability of poly (lactic acid/glycolic) (PLGA), PLGA-based nanoparticles were applied to develop a drug delivery and controlled release system. LINC00958 was associated with lipogenesis that exacerbated HCC. Based on PLGA, a nanoplatform was fabricated to deliver si-LINC00958 for HCC suppression (263). Besides, there was a study about protein-mimicking nanoparticles, which was reported to modulate a cellular homeostasis without displaying a general toxicity (264), which may act as potential nanomedicines to combination lncRNA-based therapy in cancer treatment. Nucleic acids are not allowed to transfer biological membranes directly. However, the polymorphic lipid phase can temporarily compromise the permeability barrier and allow nucleic acids to enter the cell. Extracellular vesicles as therapeutic vehicles have stoked lots of interest (265, 266). Via EVs, lncRNAs were delivered between immune and tumor cells to play a regulatory role in cancer development. A previous study demonstrated that TAMs enhanced breast cancer cells’ aerobic glycolysis and apoptotic resistance by the EV delivery of HIF-1α-stabilizing long noncoding RNA (HISLA). Mechanistically, HISLA interrupted the reaction between PHD2 and HIF-1α, thereby suppressing the hydroxylation and degradation of HIF-1α (267).

7 Conclusions

The interactions between the immune system and tumor microenvironment are complex. LncRNAs have been demonstrated to participate in various cellular metabolic, immune cell activations, and immune responses. Moreover, they play a crucial role in regulating tumorigenesis, tumor progression, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression. Therefore, understanding the regulatory role of lncRNAs in the TIME can broaden the field of antitumor immunity. Targeting lncRNAs could be a promising clinical approach in cancer therapy. Herein, we critically reviewed various characters and regulatory roles of lncRNAs. Potential strategies include increasing infiltration of antitumor immune cells, enhancing the work efficiency of antigen-presenting cells, improving the toxicity of effector cells, and reprogramming immunosuppressive cells.

There are perspectives on the awaiting challenges and future directions of immunotherapies based on lncRNAs. So far, the proportion of patients who respond well to immunotherapy is still deficient. Only a few measures have been able to enter human clinical research. Therefore, understanding the molecular and cellular drivers of immune escape is significant. Besides, optimizing long-term survival with multi-agent cancer immunotherapy can be promising. The combination of immunotherapy and lncRNAs have the potential to promote tumor treatment. Moreover, it is expected to enhance the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy and reduce side effects.

Author Contributions

YL designed this study. YG and YX drafted the manuscript. YL, YG, and YX revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31771102, 82003262), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019TQ0221, 2019M663517), and Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. 2019HXBH059).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental Regulation of Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Nat Med (2013) 19(11):1423–37. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hu G, Tang Q, Sharma S, Yu F, Escobar TM, Muljo SA, et al. Expression and Regulation of Intergenic Long Noncoding RNAs During T Cell Development and Differentiation. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(11):1190–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.2712

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jhunjhunwala S, Hammer C, Delamarre L. Antigen Presentation in Cancer: Insights Into Tumour Immunogenicity and Immune Evasion. Nat Rev Cancer (2021) 21(5):298–312. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00339-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. O’Sullivan D, Sanin DE, Pearce EJ, Pearce EL. Metabolic Interventions in the Immune Response to Cancer. Nat Rev Immunol (2019) 19(5):324–35. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0140-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hiam-Galvez K, Allen B, Spitzer M. Systemic Immunity in Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2021) 21(6):345–59. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00347-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kaymak I, Williams K, Cantor J, Jones R. Immunometabolic Interplay in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Cell (2021) 39(1):28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hu QS, Ye YQ, Chan LC, Li YJ, Liang K, Lin AF, et al. Oncogenic lncRNA Downregulates Cancer Cell Antigen Presentation and Intrinsic Tumor Suppression. Nat Immunol (2019) 20(7):835–51. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0400-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Liu S, Dang H, Lim D, Feng F, Maher C. Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer Metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer (2021) 21(7):446–60. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00353-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Heward JA, Lindsay MA. Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Regulation of the Immune Response. Trends Immunol (2014) 35(9):408–19. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Statello L, Guo C, Chen L, Huarte M. Gene Regulation by Long Non-Coding RNAs and its Biological Functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2021) 22(2):96–118. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jiang W, Wang Y, Wargo J, Lang F, Kim B. Considerations for Designing Preclinical Cancer Immune Nanomedicine Studies. Nat Nanotechnol (2021) 16(1):6–15. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-00817-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Winkle M, El-Daly S, Fabbri M, Calin G. Noncoding RNA Therapeutics - Challenges and Potential Solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2021) 20(8):629–51. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Duret L, Chureau C, Samain S, Weissenbach J, Avner P. The Xist RNA Gene Evolved in Eutherians by Pseudogenization of a Protein-Coding Gene. Science (2006) 312(5780):1653–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1126316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cao X, Yeo G, Muotri AR, Kuwabara T, Gage FH. Noncoding RNAs in the Mammalian Central Nervous System. Annu Rev Neurosci (2006) 29:77–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Conley AB, Miller WJ, Jordan IK. Human Cis Natural Antisense Transcripts Initiated by Transposable Elements. Trends Genet (2008) 24(2):53–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and Functions of Long Noncoding RNAs. Cell (2009) 136(4):629–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Mattick JS, Rinn JL. Discovery and Annotation of Long Noncoding RNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2015) 22(1):5–7. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chen YG, Satpathy AT, Chang HY. Gene Regulation in the Immune System by Long Noncoding RNAs. Nat Immunol (2017) 18(9):962–72. doi: 10.1038/ni.3771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Huarte M. The Emerging Role of lncRNAs in Cancer. Nat Med (2015) 21(11):1253–61. doi: 10.1038/nm.3981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Batista PJ, Chang HY. Long Noncoding RNAs: Cellular Address Codes in Development and Disease. Cell (2013) 152(6):1298–307. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rinn JL, Chang HY. Genome Regulation by Long Noncoding RNAs. Annu Rev Biochem (2012) 81:145–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051410-092902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Prasanth KV, Prasanth SG, Xuan Z, Hearn S, Freier SM, Bennett CF, et al. Regulating Gene Expression Through RNA Nuclear Retention. Cell (2005) 123(2):249–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Quinn JJ, Chang HY. Unique Features of Long Non-Coding RNA Biogenesis and Function. Nat Rev Genet (2016) 17(1):47–62. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Delebecque CJ, Lindner AB, Silver PA, Aldaye FA. Organization of Intracellular Reactions With Rationally Designed RNA Assemblies. Science (2011) 333(6041):470–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1206938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Beermann J, Piccoli MT, Viereck J, Thum T. Non-Coding RNAs in Development and Disease: Background, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches. Physiol Rev (2016) 96(4):1297–325. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cruz JA, Westhof E. The Dynamic Landscapes of RNA Architecture. Cell (2009) 136(4):604–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Pi Y-N, Qi W-C, Xia B-R, Lou G, Jin W-L. Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment: Biological Properties and Therapeutic Potential. Front Immunol (2021) 12:697083. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.697083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Li Y, Syed J, Sugiyama H. RNA-DNA Triplex Formation by Long Noncoding RNAs. Cell Chem Biol (2016) 23(11):1325–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ebert M, Neilson J, Sharp P. MicroRNA Sponges: Competitive Inhibitors of Small RNAs in Mammalian Cells. Nat Methods (2007) 4(9):721–6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhang Y, Liu Q, Liao Q. Long Noncoding RNA: A Dazzling Dancer in Tumor Immune Microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2020) 39(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01727-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Geisler S, Coller J. RNA in Unexpected Places: Long Non-Coding RNA Functions in Diverse Cellular Contexts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2013) 14(11):699–712. doi: 10.1038/nrm3679

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Schmitt A, Chang H. Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer Pathways. Cancer Cell (2016) 29(4):452–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Militello G, Weirick T, John D, Döring C, Dimmeler S, Uchida S. Screening and Validation of lncRNAs and circRNAs as miRNA Sponges. Brief Bioinform (2017) 18(5):780–8. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lin C, Yang L. Long Noncoding RNA in Cancer: Wiring Signaling Circuitry. Trends Cell Biol (2018) 28(4):287–301. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu Y-X. Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(10):1014–22. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kumar A, Deep G. Hypoxia in Tumor Microenvironment Regulates Exosome Biogenesis: Molecular Mechanisms and Translational Opportunities. Cancer Lett (2020) 479:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.03.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Galdiero MR, Marone G, Mantovani A. Cancer Inflammation and Cytokines. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2018) 10(8):a028662. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Crusz SM, Balkwill FR. Inflammation and Cancer: Advances and New Agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2015) 12(10):584–96. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tanaka A, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell Res (2017) 27(1):109–18. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ngambenjawong C, Gustafson HH, Pun SH. Progress in Tumor-Associated Macrophage (TAM)-Targeted Therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2017) 114:206–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chen X, Song E. Turning Foes to Friends: Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2019) 18(2):99–115. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0004-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Cheng HW, Chen YF, Wong JM, Weng CW, Chen HY, Yu SL, et al. Cancer Cells Increase Endothelial Cell Tube Formation and Survival by Activating the PI3K/Akt Signalling Pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2017) 36(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13046-017-0495-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Marin-Acevedo JA, Kimbrough EO, Lou YY. Next Generation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Beyond. J Hematol Oncol (2021) 14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01056-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Tang T, Huang X, Zhang G, Hong Z, Bai X, Liang T. Advantages of Targeting the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Over Blocking Immune Checkpoint in Cancer Immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2021) 6(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00449-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Vinay DS, Ryan EP, Pawelec G, Talib WH, Stagg J, Elkord E, et al. Immune Evasion in Cancer: Mechanistic Basis and Therapeutic Strategies. Semin Cancer Biol (2015) 35 Suppl:S185–s98. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Tumor Antigen Escape From CAR T-Cell Therapy. Cancer Discov (2018) 8(10):1219–26. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Jiang T, Shi T, Zhang H, Hu J, Song Y, Wei J, et al. Tumor Neoantigens: From Basic Research to Clinical Applications. J Hematol Oncol (2019) 12(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0787-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Garrido F, Aptsiauri N, Doorduijn EM, Garcia Lora AM, van Hall T. The Urgent Need to Recover MHC Class I in Cancers for Effective Immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol (2016) 39:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Ma J, Liu F, Sheu WC, Meng Z, Xie Y, Xu H, et al. Copresentation of Tumor Antigens and Costimulatory Molecules via Biomimetic Nanoparticles for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy. Nano Lett (2020) 20(6):4084–94. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Villa-Morales M, Fernandez-Piqueras J. Targeting the Fas/FasL Signaling Pathway in Cancer Therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2012) 16(1):85–101. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.628937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Upadhyay R, Boiarsky JA, Pantsulaia G, Svensson-Arvelund J, Lin MJ, Wroblewska A, et al. A Critical Role for Fas-Mediated Off-Target Tumor Killing in T-Cell Immunotherapy. Cancer Discov (2021) 11(3):599–613. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kalbasi A, Ribas A. Tumour-Intrinsic Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(1):25–39. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0218-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pardoll DM. The Blockade of Immune Checkpoints in Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):252–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Morad G, Helmink BA, Sharma P, Wargo JA. Hallmarks of Response, Resistance, and Toxicity to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cell (2021) 184(21):5309–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Yi M, Jiao D, Xu H, Liu Q, Zhao W, Han X, et al. Biomarkers for Predicting Efficacy of Pd-1/Pd-L1 Inhibitors. Mol Cancer (2018) 17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0864-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 Blockade Induces Responses by Inhibiting Adaptive Immune Resistance. Nature (2014) 515(7528):568–71. doi: 10.1038/nature13954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Wang Y, Wang H, Yao H, Li C, Fang J-Y, Xu J. Regulation of PD-L1: Emerging Routes for Targeting Tumor Immune Evasion. Front Pharmacol (2018) 9:536. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33(17):1974–U161. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.4358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ott PA, Hodi FS, Robert C. CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: New Immunotherapeutic Modalities With Durable Clinical Benefit in Melanoma Patients. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19(19):5300–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, Allavena P. Tumour-Associated Macrophages as Treatment Targets in Oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2017) 14(7):399–416. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Immunol Res (2017) 5(1):3–8. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wang Z, Zheng Y. lncRNAs Regulate Innate Immune Responses and Their Roles in Macrophage Polarization. Mediators Inflamm (2018) 2018:8050956. doi: 10.1155/2018/8050956

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil Recruitment and Function in Health and Inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13(3):159–75. doi: 10.1038/nri3399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the Activation and Regulation of Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(8):519–31. doi: 10.1038/nri3024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Coffelt SB, Wellenstein MD, de Visser KE. Neutrophils in Cancer: Neutral No More. Nat Rev Cancer (2016) 16(7):431–46. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.52

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG. Tumour-Associated Neutrophils in Patients With Cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2019) 16(10):601–20. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0222-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Jaillon S, Ponzetta A, Di Mitri D, Santoni A, Bonecchi R, Mantovani A. Neutrophil Diversity and Plasticity in Tumour Progression and Therapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2020) 20(9):485–503. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0281-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Souto JC, Vila L, Brú A. Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils and Cancer: Intense and Sustained Neutrophilia as a Treatment Against Solid Tumors. Med Res Rev (2011) 31(3):311–63. doi: 10.1002/med.20185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Giese MA, Hind LE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil Plasticity in the Tumor Microenvironment. Blood (2019) 133(20):2159–67. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Mollinedo F. Neutrophil Degranulation, Plasticity, and Cancer Metastasis. Trends Immunol (2019) 40(3):228–42. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2019.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Wang T, Cao L, Dong X, Wu F, De W, Huang L, et al. LINC01116 Promotes Tumor Proliferation and Neutrophil Recruitment via DDX5-Mediated Regulation of IL-1β in Glioma Cell. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11(5):302–. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2506-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kotzin J, Spencer S, McCright S, Kumar D, Collet M, Mowel W, et al. The Long Non-Coding RNA Morrbid Regulates Bim and Short-Lived Myeloid Cell Lifespan. Nature (2016) 537(7619):239–43. doi: 10.1038/nature19346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Shang AQ, Wang WW, Gu CZ, Chen C, Zeng BJ, Yang YB, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA HOTTIP Enhances IL-6 Expression to Potentiate Immune Escape of Ovarian Cancer Cells by Upregulating the Expression of PD-L1 in Neutrophils. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2019) 38(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1394-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Nallasamy P, Chava S, Verma SS, Mishra S, Gorantla S, Coulter DW, et al. PD-L1, Inflammation, Non-Coding RNAs, and Neuroblastoma: Immuno-Oncology Perspective. Semin Cancer Biol (2018) 52(Pt 2):53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Wang TT, Zhao YL, Peng LS, Chen N, Chen W, Lv YP, et al. Tumour-Activated Neutrophils in Gastric Cancer Foster Immune Suppression and Disease Progression Through GM-CSF-PD-L1 Pathway. Gut (2017) 66(11):1900–11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Ginhoux F, Guilliams M. Tissue-Resident Macrophage Ontogeny and Homeostasis. Immunity (2016) 44(3):439–49. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Mass E, Ballesteros I, Farlik M, Halbritter F, Günther P, Crozet L, et al. Specification of Tissue-Resident Macrophages During Organogenesis. Science (2016) 353(6304):aaf4238. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Hoeffel G, Chen J, Lavin Y, Low D, Almeida FF, See P, et al. C-Myb(+) Erythro-Myeloid Progenitor-Derived Fetal Monocytes Give Rise to Adult Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Immunity (2015) 42(4):665–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Loyher PL, Hamon P, Laviron M, Meghraoui-Kheddar A, Goncalves E, Deng Z, et al. Macrophages of Distinct Origins Contribute to Tumor Development in the Lung. J Exp Med (2018) 215(10):2536–53. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. DeNardo DG, Ruffell B. Macrophages as Regulators of Tumour Immunity and Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol (2019) 19(6):369–82. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0127-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Ruffell B, Affara NI, Coussens LM. Differential Macrophage Programming in the Tumor Microenvironment. Trends Immunol (2012) 33(3):119–26. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-Like Receptors and Their Crosstalk With Other Innate Receptors in Infection and Immunity. Immunity (2011) 34(5):637–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Kagan J, Su T, Horng T, Chow A, Akira S, Medzhitov R. TRAM Couples Endocytosis of Toll-Like Receptor 4 to the Induction of Interferon-Beta. Nat Immunol (2008) 9(4):361–8. doi: 10.1038/ni1569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage Plasticity and Interaction With Lymphocyte Subsets: Cancer as a Paradigm. Nat Immunol (2010) 11(10):889–96. doi: 10.1038/ni.1937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Xia Y, Rao L, Yao H, Wang Z, Ning P, Chen X. Engineering Macrophages for Cancer Immunotherapy and Drug Delivery. Adv Mater (2020) 32(40):e2002054. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Murray P, Wynn T. Protective and Pathogenic Functions of Macrophage Subsets. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(11):723–37. doi: 10.1038/nri3073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. De Palma M, Lewis CE. Macrophage Regulation of Tumor Responses to Anticancer Therapies. Cancer Cell (2013) 23(3):277–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Shu Y, Cheng P. Targeting Tumor-Associated Macrophages for Cancer Immunotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer (2020) 1874(2):188434. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE. The Role of Myeloid Cells in the Promotion of Tumour Angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer (2008) 8(8):618–31. doi: 10.1038/nrc2444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Chen MT, Lin HS, Shen C, Ma YN, Wang F, Zhao HL, et al. PU.1-Regulated Long Noncoding RNA lnc-MC Controls Human Monocyte/Macrophage Differentiation Through Interaction With MicroRNA 199a-5p. Mol Cell Biol (2015) 35(18):3212–24. doi: 10.1128/mcb.00429-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Lin HS, Gong JN, Su R, Chen MT, Song L, Shen C, et al. miR-199a-5p Inhibits Monocyte/Macrophage Differentiation by Targeting the Activin A Type 1B Receptor Gene and Finally Reducing C/Ebpα Expression. J Leukoc Biol (2014) 96(6):1023–35. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1A0514-240R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Sang LJ, Ju HQ, Liu GP, Tian T, Ma GL, Lu YX, et al. LncRNA CamK-A Regulates Ca2+-Signaling-Mediated Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling. Mol Cell (2018) 72(1):71–83.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Xie C, Guo Y, Lou S. LncRNA ANCR Promotes Invasion and Migration of Gastric Cancer by Regulating FoxO1 Expression to Inhibit Macrophage M1 Polarization. Dig Dis Sci (2020) 65(10):2863–72. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-06019-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Munteanu MC, Huang C, Liang Y, Sathiaseelan R, Zeng X, Liu L. Long Non-Coding RNA FENDRR Regulates Ifnγ-Induced M1 Phenotype in Macrophages. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):13672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70633-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Wang M, Mao C, Ouyang L, Liu Y, Lai W, Liu N, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00336 Inhibits Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer by Functioning as a Competing Endogenous RNA. Cell Death Differ (2019) 26(11):2329–43. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0304-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Yang D, Liu KY, Fan L, Liang WQ, Xu TY, Jiang WW, et al. LncRNA RP11-361F15.2 Promotes Osteosarcoma Tumorigenesis by Inhibiting M2-Like Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages of CPEB4. Cancer Lett (2020) 473:33–49. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.12.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Tian XH, Wu YY, Yang YT, Wang JX, Niu ML, Gao SJ, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00662 Promotes M2 Macrophage Polarization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via Activating Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling. Mol Oncol (2020) 14(2):462–83. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Xue M, Chen W, Xiang A, Wang R, Chen H, Pan J, et al. Hypoxic Exosomes Facilitate Bladder Tumor Growth and Development Through Transferring Long Non-Coding RNA-Uca1. Mol Cancer (2017) 16(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0714-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Liang Z-X, Liu H-S, Wang F-W, Xiong L, Zhou C, Hu T, et al. LncRNA RPPH1 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Interacting With TUBB3 and by Promoting Exosomes-Mediated Macrophage M2 Polarization. Cell Death Dis (2019) 10(11):829. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2077-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Dong F, Ruan S, Wang J, Xia Y, Le K, Xiao X, et al. M2 Macrophage-Induced lncRNA PCAT6 Facilitates Tumorigenesis and Angiogenesis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Through Modulation of VEGFR2. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11(9):728. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02926-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Ye Y, Guo J, Xiao P, Ning J, Zhang R, Liu P, et al. Macrophages-Induced Long Noncoding RNA H19 Up-Regulation Triggers and Activates the miR-193b/MAPK1 Axis and Promotes Cell Aggressiveness in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Lett (2020) 469:310–22. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Zeng XY, Xie H, Yuan J, Jiang XY, Yong JH, Zeng D, et al. M2-Like Tumor-Associated Macrophages-Secreted EGF Promotes Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Metastasis via Activating EGFR-ERK Signaling and Suppressing lncRNA LIMT Expression. Cancer Biol Ther (2019) 20(7):956–66. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1564567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Xing F, Liu Y, Wu S-Y, Wu K, Sharma S, Mo Y-Y, et al. Loss of XIST in Breast Cancer Activates MSN-C-Met and Reprograms Microglia via Exosomal miRNA to Promote Brain Metastasis. Cancer Res (2018) 78(15):4316–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-1102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Zhao Y, Yu Z, Ma R, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Yan Y, et al. lncRNA-Xist/miR-101-3p/KLF6/C/Ebpα Axis Promotes TAM Polarization to Regulate Cancer Cell Proliferation and Migration. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2021) 23:536–51. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Shimasaki N, Jain A, Campana D. NK Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2020) 19(3):200–18. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0052-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Raulet DH, Guerra N. Oncogenic Stress Sensed by the Immune System: Role of Natural Killer Cell Receptors. Nat Rev Immunol (2009) 9(8):568–80. doi: 10.1038/nri2604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Li G, Kryczek I, Nam J, Li X, Li S, Li J, et al. LIMIT Is an Immunogenic lncRNA in Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy. Nat Cell Biol (2021) 23(5):526–37. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00672-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Sade-Feldman M, Jiao YJ, Chen JH, Rooney MS, Barzily-Rokni M, Eliane JP, et al. Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade Therapy Through Inactivation of Antigen Presentation. Nat Commun (2017) 8(1):1136. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01062-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M, Walzer T, Ugolini S. Functions of Natural Killer Cells. Nat Immunol (2008) 9(5):503–10. doi: 10.1038/ni1582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Huntington ND, Cursons J, Rautela J. The Cancer–Natural Killer Cell Immunity Cycle. Nat Rev Cancer (2020) 20(8):437–54. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0272-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Cózar B, Greppi M, Carpentier S, Narni-Mancinelli E, Chiossone L, Vivier E. Tumor-Infiltrating Natural Killer Cells. Cancer Discov (2021) 11(1):34–44. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-20-0655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Terrén I, Orrantia A, Vitallé J, Zenarruzabeitia O, Borrego F. NK Cell Metabolism and Tumor Microenvironment. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2278. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Beaulieu AM, Bezman NA, Lee JE, Matloubian M, Sun JC, Lanier LL. MicroRNA Function in NK-Cell Biology. Immunol Rev (2013) 253(1):40–52. doi: 10.1111/imr.12045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Caligiuri MA. Human Natural Killer Cells. Blood (2008) 112(3):461–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-077438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Gunesch JT, Dixon AL, Ebrahim TA, Berrien-Elliott MM, Tatineni S, Kumar T, et al. CD56 Regulates Human NK Cell Cytotoxicity Through Pyk2. Elife (2020) 9:e57346. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Zhang R, Ni F, Fu B, Wu Y, Sun R, Tian Z, et al. A Long Noncoding RNA Positively Regulates CD56 in Human Natural Killer Cells. Oncotarget (2016) 7(45):72546–58. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Kim BR, Park SH, Jeong YA, Na YJ, Kim JL, Jo MJ, et al. RUNX3 Enhances TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis by Upregulating DR5 in Colorectal Cancer. Oncogene (2019) 38(20):3903–18. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0693-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Qin X, Zhou M, Lv H, Mao X, Li X, Guo H, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00657 Inhibits Cervical Cancer Development by Sponging miR-20a-5p and Targeting RUNX3. Cancer Lett (2021) 498:130–41. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Shankaran V, Ikeda H, Bruce AT, White JM, Swanson PE, Old LJ, et al. IFNgamma and Lymphocytes Prevent Primary Tumour Development and Shape Tumour Immunogenicity. Nature (2001) 410(6832):1107–11. doi: 10.1038/35074122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Fang P, Xiang L, Chen W, Li S, Huang S, Li J, et al. LncRNA GAS5 Enhanced the Killing Effect of NK Cell on Liver Cancer Through Regulating miR-544/Runx3. Innate Immun (2019) 25(2):99–109. doi: 10.1177/1753425919827632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Wei MF, Gu ZS, Zheng LL, Zhao MX, Wang XJ. Long Non-Coding RNA GAS5 Promotes Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity Against Gastric Cancer by Regulating miR-18a. Neoplasma (2020) 67(5):1085–93. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_191014N1034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Giovanelli P, Sandoval TA, Cubillos-Ruiz JR. Dendritic Cell Metabolism and Function in Tumors. Trends Immunol (2019) 40(8):699–718. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2019.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Worbs T, Hammerschmidt SI, Förster R. Dendritic Cell Migration in Health and Disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2017) 17(1):30–48. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Pitt JM, André F, Amigorena S, Soria J-C, Eggermont A, Kroemer G, et al. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes for Cancer Therapy. J Clin Invest (2016) 126(4):1224–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI81137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Tiberio L, Del Prete A, Schioppa T, Sozio F, Bosisio D, Sozzani S. Chemokine and Chemotactic Signals in Dendritic Cell Migration. Cell Mol Immunol (2018) 15(4):346–52. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0005-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Shortman K, Liu Y-J. Mouse and Human Dendritic Cell Subtypes. Nat Rev Immunol (2002) 2(3):151–61. doi: 10.1038/nri746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Burbage M, Amigorena S. A Dendritic Cell Multitasks to Tackle Cancer. Nature (2020) 584(7822):533–4. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02339-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Gardner A, Ruffell B. Dendritic Cells and Cancer Immunity. Trends Immunol (2016) 37(12):855–65. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Wang P, Xue Y, Han Y, Lin L, Wu C, Xu S, et al. The STAT3-Binding Long Noncoding RNA lnc-DC Controls Human Dendritic Cell Differentiation. Science (2014) 344(6181):310–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1251456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Zhang W, Zhou Y, Ding Y. Lnc-DC Mediates the Over-Maturation of Decidual Dendritic Cells and Induces the Increase in Th1 Cells in Preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol (2017) 77(6):e12647. doi: 10.1111/aji.12647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Xin J, Li J, Feng Y, Wang L, Zhang Y, Yang R. Downregulation of Long Noncoding RNA HOTAIRM1 Promotes Monocyte/Dendritic Cell Differentiation Through Competitively Binding to Endogenous miR-3960. Onco Targets Ther (2017) 10:1307–15. doi: 10.2147/ott.s124201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Liu J, Zhang X, Chen K, Cheng Y, Liu S, Xia M, et al. CCR7 Chemokine Receptor-Inducible lnc-Dpf3 Restrains Dendritic Cell Migration by Inhibiting HIF-1α-Mediated Glycolysis. Immunity (2019) 50(3):600–15.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Wu M, Shang X, Sun Y, Wu J, Liu G. Integrated Analysis of Lymphocyte Infiltration-Associated lncRNA for Ovarian Cancer via TCGA, GTEx and GEO Datasets. PeerJ (2020) 8:e8961–e. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8961

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Zhang M, Zheng Y, Sun Y, Li S, Chen L, Jin X, et al. Knockdown of NEAT1 Induces Tolerogenic Phenotype in Dendritic Cells by Inhibiting Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome. Theranostics (2019) 9(12):3425–42. doi: 10.7150/thno.33178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells as Regulators of the Immune System. Nat Rev Immunol (2009) 9(3):162–74. doi: 10.1038/nri2506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. De Cicco P, Ercolano G, Ianaro A. The New Era of Cancer Immunotherapy: Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells to Overcome Immune Evasion. Front Immunol (2020) 11:1680. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Movahedi K, Guilliams M, Van den Bossche J, Van den Bergh R, Gysemans C, Beschin A, et al. Identification of Discrete Tumor-Induced Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subpopulations With Distinct T Cell-Suppressive Activity. Blood (2008) 111(8):4233–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-099226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Zhao Y, Wu T, Shao S, Shi B, Zhao Y. Phenotype, Development, and Biological Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Oncoimmunology (2016) 5(2):e1004983. doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2015.1004983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated Regulation of Myeloid Cells by Tumours. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12(4):253–68. doi: 10.1038/nri3175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Gao Y, Shang W, Zhang D, Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Lnc-C/Ebpβ Modulates Differentiation of MDSCs Through Downregulating IL4i1 With C/Ebpβ LIP and WDR5. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1661. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Tian X, Zheng Y, Yin K, Ma J, Tian J, Zhang Y, et al. LncRNA AK036396 Inhibits Maturation and Accelerates Immunosuppression of Polymorphonuclear Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells by Enhancing the Stability of Ficolin B. Cancer Immunol Res (2020) 8(4):565–77. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-19-0595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Shang W, Tang Z, Gao Y, Qi H, Su X, Zhang Y, et al. LncRNA RNCR3 Promotes Chop Expression by Sponging miR-185-5p During MDSC Differentiation. Oncotarget (2017) 8(67):111754–69. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Zheng Y, Tian X, Wang T, Xia X, Cao F, Tian J, et al. Long Noncoding RNA Pvt1 Regulates the Immunosuppression Activity of Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Tumor-Bearing Mice. Mol Cancer (2019) 18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0978-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Shang W, Gao Y, Tang Z, Zhang Y, Yang R. The Pseudogene Olfr29-Ps1 Promotes the Suppressive Function and Differentiation of Monocytic MDSCs. Cancer Immunol Res (2019) 7(5):813–27. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL. Human T Cell Development, Localization, and Function Throughout Life. Immunity (2018) 48(2):202–13. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. van der Leun AM, Thommen DS, Schumacher TN. CD8(+) T Cell States in Human Cancer: Insights From Single-Cell Analysis. Nat Rev Cancer (2020) 20(4):218–32. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0235-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Balkwill F, Charles KA, Mantovani A. Smoldering and Polarized Inflammation in the Initiation and Promotion of Malignant Disease. Cancer Cell (2005) 7(3):211–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Medzhitov R, Horng T. Transcriptional Control of the Inflammatory Response. Nat Rev Immunol (2009) 9(10):692–703. doi: 10.1038/nri2634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Zhu J. T Helper Cell Differentiation, Heterogeneity, and Plasticity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2018) 10(10):a030338. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Busch DH, Fräßle SP, Sommermeyer D, Buchholz VR, Riddell SR. Role of Memory T Cell Subsets for Adoptive Immunotherapy. Semin Immunol (2016) 28(1):28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2016.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Nair S, Dhodapkar MV. Natural Killer T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1178. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Chen L. Co-Inhibitory Molecules of the B7-CD28 Family in the Control of T-Cell Immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2004) 4(5):336–47. doi: 10.1038/nri1349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Lesterhuis WJ, Steer H, Lake RA. PD-L2 Is Predominantly Expressed by Th2 Cells. Mol Immunol (2011) 49(1-2):1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.09.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Mineo M, Lyons SM, Zdioruk M, von Spreckelsen N, Ferrer-Luna R, Ito H, et al. Tumor Interferon Signaling Is Regulated by a lncRNA INCR1 Transcribed From the PD-L1 Locus. Mol Cell (2020) 78(6):1207–23.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Toor SM, Nair VS, Decock J, Elkord E. Immune Checkpoints in the Tumor Microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol (2020) 65:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Anderson AC. Tim-3: An Emerging Target in the Cancer Immunotherapy Landscape. Cancer Immunol Res (2014) 2(5):393. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Ji J, Yin Y, Ju H, Xu X, Liu W, Fu Q, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA Lnc-Tim3 Exacerbates CD8 T Cell Exhaustion via Binding to Tim-3 and Inducing Nuclear Translocation of Bat3 in HCC. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(5):478. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0528-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Yan K, Fu Y, Zhu N, Wang Z, Hong J-L, Li Y, et al. Repression of lncRNA NEAT1 Enhances the Antitumor Activity of CD8+T Cells Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Regulating miR-155/Tim-3. Int J Biochem Cell Biol (2019) 110:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Huang D, Chen J, Yang L, Ouyang Q, Li J, Lao L, et al. NKILA lncRNA Promotes Tumor Immune Evasion by Sensitizing T Cells to Activation-Induced Cell Death. Nat Immunol (2018) 19(10):1112–25. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0207-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Liang Z, Tang F. The Potency of lncRNA MALAT1/miR-155/CTLA4 Axis in Altering Th1/Th2 Balance of Asthma. Biosci Rep (2020) 40(2):BSR20190397. doi: 10.1042/bsr20190397

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Knochelmann HM, Dwyer CJ, Bailey SR, Amaya SM, Elston DM, Mazza-McCrann JM, et al. When Worlds Collide: Th17 and Treg Cells in Cancer and Autoimmunity. Cell Mol Immunol (2018) 15(5):458–69. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0004-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Shui X, Chen S, Lin J, Kong J, Zhou C, Wu J. Knockdown of lncRNA NEAT1 Inhibits Th17/CD4(+) T Cell Differentiation Through Reducing the STAT3 Protein Level. J Cell Physiol (2019) 234(12):22477–84. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Wang Y, Su MA, Wan YY. An Essential Role of the Transcription Factor GATA-3 for the Function of Regulatory T Cells. Immunity (2011) 35(3):337–48. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Jiang R, Tang J, Chen Y, Deng L, Ji J, Xie Y, et al. The Long Noncoding RNA lnc-EGFR Stimulates T-Regulatory Cells Differentiation Thus Promoting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Evasion. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15129. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Ni C, Fang QQ, Chen WZ, Jiang JX, Jiang Z, Ye J, et al. Breast Cancer-Derived Exosomes Transmit lncRNA SNHG16 to Induce CD73+γδ1 Treg Cells. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0129-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Yu Z, Zhao H, Feng X, Li H, Qiu C, Yi X, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA FENDRR Acts as a miR-423-5p Sponge to Suppress the Treg-Mediated Immune Escape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2019) 17:516–29. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Facciabene A, Motz GT, Coukos G. T-Regulatory Cells: Key Players in Tumor Immune Escape and Angiogenesis. Cancer Res (2012) 72(9):2162–71. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3687

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang J, Liang H. Natural Killer T Cell Cytotoxic Activity in Cervical Cancer Is Facilitated by the LINC00240/microRNA-124-3p/STAT3/MICA Axis. Cancer Lett (2020) 474:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.12.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Martin F, Chan AC. B Cell Immunobiology in Disease: Evolving Concepts From the Clinic. Annu Rev Immunol (2006) 24:467–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Franchina DG, Grusdat M, Brenner D. B-Cell Metabolic Remodeling and Cancer. Trends Cancer (2018) 4(2):138–50. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Brazão TF, Johnson JS, Müller J, Heger A, Ponting CP, Tybulewicz VL. Long Noncoding RNAs in B-Cell Development and Activation. Blood (2016) 128(7):e10–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-680843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Esposti DD, Hernandez-Vargas H, Voegele C, Fernandez-Jimenez N, Forey N, Bancel B, et al. Identification of Novel Long Non-Coding RNAs Deregulated in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using RNA-Sequencing. Oncotarget (2016) 7(22):31862–77. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Song H, Han LM, Gao Q, Sun Y. Long Non-Coding RNA CRNDE Promotes Tumor Growth in Medulloblastoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2016) 20(12):2588–97.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

174. Winkle M, Kluiver JL, Diepstra A, van den Berg A. Emerging Roles for Long Noncoding RNAs in B-Cell Development and Malignancy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2017) 120:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Zhao L, Liu Y, Zhang J, Liu Y, Qi Q. LncRNA SNHG14/miR-5590-3p/ZEB1 Positive Feedback Loop Promoted Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Progression and Immune Evasion Through Regulating PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint. Cell Death Dis (2019) 10(10):731. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1886-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Shi X, Cui Z, Liu X, Wu S, Wu Y, Fang F, et al. LncRNA FIRRE Is Activated by MYC and Promotes the Development of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma via Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2019) 510(4):594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Wang W, Wu F, Ma P, Gan S, Li X, Chen L, et al. LncRNA CRNDE Promotes the Progression of B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by Targeting the miR-345-5p/CREB Axis. Mol Cells (2020) 43(8):718–27. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2020.0065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

178. Jing Z, Gao L, Wang H, Chen J, Nie B, Hong Q. Long Non-Coding RNA GAS5 Regulates Human B Lymphocytic Leukaemia Tumourigenesis and Metastasis by Sponging miR-222. Cancer Biomark (2019) 26(3):385–92. doi: 10.3233/cbm-190246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Shackleton M, Quintana E, Fearon ER, Morrison SJ. Heterogeneity in Cancer: Cancer Stem Cells Versus Clonal Evolution. Cell (2009) 138(5):822–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Nassar D, Blanpain C. Cancer Stem Cells: Basic Concepts and Therapeutic Implications. Annu Rev Pathol (2016) 11:47–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, et al. The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells With Properties of Stem Cells. Cell (2008) 133(4):704–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. Tao W, Chu C, Zhou W, Huang Z, Zhai K, Fang X, et al. Dual Role of WISP1 in Maintaining Glioma Stem Cells and Tumor-Supportive Macrophages in Glioblastoma. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):3015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16827-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Wu A, Wei J, Kong LY, Wang Y, Priebe W, Qiao W, et al. Glioma Cancer Stem Cells Induce Immunosuppressive Macrophages/Microglia. Neuro Oncol (2010) 12(11):1113–25. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Bayik D, Lathia JD. Cancer Stem Cell-Immune Cell Crosstalk in Tumour Progression. Nat Rev Cancer (2021) 21(8):526–36. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00366-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

185. Liang S, Ristich V, Arase H, Dausset J, Carosella ED, Horuzsko A. Modulation of Dendritic Cell Differentiation by HLA-G and ILT4 Requires the IL-6–STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2008) 105(24):8357–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803341105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

186. Quaglino E, Conti L, Cavallo F. Breast Cancer Stem Cell Antigens as Targets for Immunotherapy. Semin Immunol (2020) 47:101386. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

187. Otvos B, Silver DJ, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Alvarado AG, Turaga SM, Sorensen MD, et al. Cancer Stem Cell-Secreted Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Stimulates Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cell Function and Facilitates Glioblastoma Immune Evasion. Stem Cells (Dayton Ohio) (2016) 34(8):2026–39. doi: 10.1002/stem.2393

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

188. Wang Y, Zhu P, Luo J, Wang J, Liu Z, Wu W, et al. LncRNA HAND2-AS1 Promotes Liver Cancer Stem Cell Self-Renewal via BMP Signaling. EMBO J (2019) 38(17):e101110. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018101110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

189. Wang Y, He L, Du Y, Zhu P, Huang G, Luo J, et al. The Long Noncoding RNA Lnctcf7 Promotes Self-Renewal of Human Liver Cancer Stem Cells Through Activation of Wnt Signaling. Cell Stem Cell (2015) 16(4):413–25. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

190. Fu Z, Chen C, Zhou Q, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Zhao X, et al. LncRNA HOTTIP Modulates Cancer Stem Cell Properties in Human Pancreatic Cancer by Regulating HOXA9. Cancer Lett (2017) 410:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

191. Peperstraete E, Lecerf C, Collette J, Vennin C, Raby L, Völkel P, et al. Enhancement of Breast Cancer Cell Aggressiveness by lncRNA H19 and Its Mir-675 Derivative: Insight Into Shared and Different Actions. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(7):1730. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

192. Yan X, Zhang D, Wu W, Wu S, Qian J, Hao Y, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Hepatocarcinogenesis via lncRNA-MUF Interaction With ANXA2 and miR-34a. Cancer Res (2017) 77(23):6704–16. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

193. Park D, Sahai E, Rullan A. SnapShot: Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Cell (2020) 181(2):486–.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

194. Biffi G, Oni TE, Spielman B, Hao Y, Elyada E, Park Y, et al. IL1-Induced JAK/STAT Signaling Is Antagonized by Tgfβ to Shape CAF Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov (2019) 9(2):282–301. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

195. Özdemir BC, Pentcheva-Hoang T, Carstens JL, Zheng X, Wu CC, Simpson TR, et al. Depletion of Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts and Fibrosis Induces Immunosuppression and Accelerates Pancreas Cancer With Reduced Survival. Cancer Cell (2014) 25(6):719–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

196. Rhim AD, Oberstein PE, Thomas DH, Mirek ET, Palermo CF, Sastra SA, et al. Stromal Elements Act to Restrain, Rather Than Support, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell (2014) 25(6):735–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

197. Straussman R, Morikawa T, Shee K, Barzily-Rokni M, Qian ZR, Du J, et al. Tumour Micro-Environment Elicits Innate Resistance to RAF Inhibitors Through HGF Secretion. Nature (2012) 487(7408):500–4. doi: 10.1038/nature11183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

198. Huang TX, Tan XY, Huang HS, Li YT, Liu BL, Liu KS, et al. Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Secreted WNT2 Restores Dendritic Cell-Mediated Antitumour Immunity. Gut (2021) 71(2):333–44. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

199. Hu T, Hu J. Melanoma-Derived Exosomes Induce Reprogramming Fibroblasts Into Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts via Gm26809 Delivery. Cell Cycle (Georgetown Tex) (2019) 18(22):3085–94. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1669380

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

200. Ding L, Ren J, Zhang D, Li Y, Huang X, Hu Q, et al. A Novel Stromal lncRNA Signature Reprograms Fibroblasts to Promote the Growth of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma via LncRNA-CAF/interleukin-33. Carcinogenesis (2018) 39(3):397–406. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

201. Zhao L, Ji G, Le X, Wang C, Xu L, Feng M, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00092 Acts in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Drive Glycolysis and Progression of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res (2017) 77(6):1369–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

202. Zhou L, Li J, Tang Y, Yang M. Exosomal LncRNA LINC00659 Transferred From Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Progression via miR-342-3p/ANXA2 Axis. J Transl Med (2021) 19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02648-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

203. Ren J, Ding L, Zhang D, Shi G, Xu Q, Shen S, et al. Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts Promote the Stemness and Chemoresistance of Colorectal Cancer by Transferring Exosomal lncRNA H19. Theranostics (2018) 8(14):3932–48. doi: 10.7150/thno.25541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

204. Deng X, Ruan H, Zhang X, Xu X, Zhu Y, Peng H, et al. Long Noncoding RNA CCAL Transferred From Fibroblasts by Exosomes Promotes Chemoresistance of Colorectal Cancer Cells. Int J Cancer (2020) 146(6):1700–16. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

205. Ramasamy SK, Kusumbe AP, Adams RH. Regulation of Tissue Morphogenesis by Endothelial Cell-Derived Signals. Trends Cell Biol (2015) 25(3):148–57. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

206. Potente M, Mäkinen T. Vascular Heterogeneity and Specialization in Development and Disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2017) 18(8):477–94. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.36

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

207. Jiang X, Wang J, Deng X, Xiong F, Zhang S, Gong Z, et al. The Role of Microenvironment in Tumor Angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2020) 39(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01709-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

208. De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV. Microenvironmental Regulation of Tumour Angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer (2017) 17(8):457–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

209. Viallard C, Larrivée B. Tumor Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization: Alternative Therapeutic Targets. Angiogenesis (2017) 20(4):409–26. doi: 10.1007/s10456-017-9562-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

210. Ribatti D, Tamma R. Hematopoietic Growth Factors and Tumor Angiogenesis. Cancer Lett (2019) 440-441:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

211. Shao Y, Saredy J, Yang WY, Sun Y, Lu Y, Saaoud F, et al. Vascular Endothelial Cells and Innate Immunity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2020) 40(6):e138–e52. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.120.314330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

212. Boulberdaa M, Scott E, Ballantyne M, Garcia R, Descamps B, Angelini G, et al. A Role for the Long Noncoding RNA SENCR in Commitment and Function of Endothelial Cells. Mol Ther (2016) 24(5):978–90. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

213. Zhang SH, Zhang SG, Zhou P, Wei X, Mao XD, Lin SG, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 Affects High Glucose-Induced Endothelial Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis, Migration and Angiogenesis by Regulating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2019) 23(19):8551–9. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201910_19170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

214. Shihabudeen Haider Ali M, Cheng X, Moran M, Haemmig S, Naldrett M, Alvarez S, et al. LncRNA Meg3 Protects Endothelial Function by Regulating the DNA Damage Response. Nucleic Acids Res (2019) 47(3)::1505–22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

215. Huang S, Lu W, Ge D, Meng N, Li Y, Su L, et al. A New microRNA Signal Pathway Regulated by Long Noncoding RNA TGFB2-OT1 in Autophagy and Inflammation of Vascular Endothelial Cells. Autophagy (2015) ;11(12):2172–83. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1106663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

216. Chen J, Liu A, Wang Z, Wang B, Chai X, Lu W, et al. LINC00173.v1 Promotes Angiogenesis and Progression of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Sponging miR-511-5p to Regulate VEGFA Expression. Mol Cancer (2020) 19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01217-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

217. Jones SA, Jenkins BJ. Recent Insights Into Targeting the IL-6 Cytokine Family in Inflammatory Diseases and Cancer. Nat Rev Immunol (2018) 18(12):773–89. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0066-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

218. Bhat AA, Nisar S, Maacha S, Carneiro-Lobo TC, Akhtar S, Siveen KS, et al. Cytokine-Chemokine Network Driven Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer; Promising Avenue for Targeted Therapy. Mol Cancer (2021) 20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01294-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

219. Batlle E, Massagué J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling in Immunity and Cancer. Immunity (2019) 50(4):924–40. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

220. Carpenter S, Fitzgerald KA. Cytokines and Long Noncoding RNAs. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2018) 10(6):a028589. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

221. Wang J, Shao N, Ding X, Tan B, Song Q, Wang N, et al. Crosstalk Between Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Pathway and Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer. Cancer Lett (2016) 370(2):296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

222. Sakai S, Ohhata T, Kitagawa K, Uchida C, Aoshima T, Niida H, et al. ELIT-1long Noncoding RNA Acts as a Smad3 Cofactor to Facilitate Tgfβ/Smad Signaling and Promote Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cancer Res (2019) 79(11):2821–38. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-3210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

223. Yuan J, Yang F, Wang F, Ma J, Guo Y, Tao Q, et al. A Long Noncoding RNA Activated by TGF-β Promotes the Invasion-Metastasis Cascade in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Cell (2014) 25(5):666–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

224. Li G, Wang W, Sun J, Xin B, Zhang X, Wang T, et al. Long Non-Coding RNAs AC026904.1 and UCA1: A "One-Two Punch" for TGF-β-Induced SNAI2 Activation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer. Theranostics (2018) 8(10):2846–61. doi: 10.7150/thno.23463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

225. Wu W, Chen F, Cui X, Yang L, Chen J, Zhao J, et al. LncRNA NKILA Suppresses TGF-β-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Blocking NF-κb Signaling in Breast Cancer. Int J Cancer (2018) 143(9):2213–24. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

226. Lin Y, He Z, Ye J, Liu Z, She X, Gao X, et al. Progress in Understanding the IL-6/STAT3 Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Onco Targets Ther (2020) 13:13023–32. doi: 10.2147/ott.s278013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

227. Xu Z, Yang F, Wei D, Liu B, Chen C, Bao Y, et al. Long Noncoding RNA-SRLR Elicits Intrinsic Sorafenib Resistance via Evoking IL-6/STAT3 Axis in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncogene (2017) 36(14):1965–77. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

228. Zhang J, Li Z, Liu L, Wang Q, Li S, Chen D, et al. Long Noncoding RNA TSLNC8 Is a Tumor Suppressor That Inactivates the Interleukin-6/STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Hepatology (2018) 67(1):171–87. doi: 10.1002/hep.29405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

229. Wang X, Sun W, Shen W, Xia M, Chen C, Xiang D, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA DILC Regulates Liver Cancer Stem Cells via IL-6/STAT3 Axis. J Hepatol (2016) 64(6):1283–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

230. Negishi H, Taniguchi T, Yanai H. The Interferon (IFN) Class of Cytokines and the IFN Regulatory Factor (IRF) Transcription Factor Family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2018) 10(11):a028423. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

231. Huang J, Li J, Li Y, Lu Z, Che Y, Mao S, et al. Interferon-Inducible lncRNA IRF1-AS Represses Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Promoting Interferon Response. Cancer Lett (2019) 459:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

232. Xu H, Jiang Y, Xu X, Su X, Liu Y, Ma Y, et al. Inducible Degradation of lncRNA Sros1 Promotes IFN-γ-Mediated Activation of Innate Immune Responses by Stabilizing Stat1 mRNA. Nat Immunol (2019) 20(12):1621–30. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0542-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

233. Wang W, Wu D, He X, Hu X, Hu C, Shen Z, et al. CCL18-Induced HOTAIR Upregulation Promotes Malignant Progression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through the miR-130a-5p-ZEB1 Axis. Cancer Lett (2019) 460:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

234. Bhan A, Soleimani M, Mandal SS. Long Noncoding RNA and Cancer: A New Paradigm. Cancer Res (2017) 77(15):3965–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

235. Esposito R, Bosch N, Lanzós A, Polidori T, Pulido-Quetglas C, Johnson R. Hacking the Cancer Genome: Profiling Therapeutically Actionable Long Non-Coding RNAs Using CRISPR-Cas9 Screening. Cancer Cell (2019) 35(4):545–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

236. Bruni D, Angell HK, Galon J. The Immune Contexture and Immunoscore in Cancer Prognosis and Therapeutic Efficacy. Nat Rev Cancer (2020) 20(11):662–80. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0285-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

237. Li Z-X, Zhu Q-N, Zhang H-B, Hu Y, Wang G, Zhu Y-S. MALAT1: A Potential Biomarker in Cancer. Cancer Manag Res (2018) 10:6757–68. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S169406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

238. Shuai Y, Ma Z, Lu J, Feng J. LncRNA SNHG15: A New Budding Star in Human Cancers. Cell Prolif (2020) 53(1):e12716. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

239. Arun G, Diermeier SD, Spector DL. Therapeutic Targeting of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer. Trends Mol Med (2018) 24(3):257–77. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

240. Kotikam V, Rozners E. Amide-Modified RNA: Using Protein Backbone to Modulate Function of Short Interfering RNAs. Acc Chem Res (2020) 53(9):1782–90. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

241. Amodio N, Stamato MA, Juli G, Morelli E, Fulciniti M, Manzoni M, et al. Drugging the lncRNA MALAT1 via LNA gapmeR ASO Inhibits Gene Expression of Proteasome Subunits and Triggers Anti-Multiple Myeloma Activity. Leukemia (2018) 32(9):1948–57. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0067-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

242. Levin AA. Treating Disease at the RNA Level With Oligonucleotides. N Engl J Med (2019) 380(1):57–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1705346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

243. Roberts TC, Langer R, Wood MJA. Advances in Oligonucleotide Drug Delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2020) 19(10):673–94. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0075-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

244. Arun G, Diermeier S, Akerman M, Chang KC, Wilkinson JE, Hearn S, et al. Differentiation of Mammary Tumors and Reduction in Metastasis Upon Malat1 lncRNA Loss. Genes Dev (2016) 30(1):34–51. doi: 10.1101/gad.270959.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

245. Pichler M, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Nam SY, Dragomir MP, Bayraktar R, Anfossi S, et al. Therapeutic Potential of FLANC, a Novel Primate-Specific Long Non-Coding RNA in Colorectal Cancer. Gut (2020) 69(10):1818–31. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

246. Goyal A, Myacheva K, Groß M, Klingenberg M, Duran Arqué B, Diederichs S. Challenges of CRISPR/Cas9 Applications for Long Non-Coding RNA Genes. Nucleic Acids Res (2017) 45(3):e12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

247. Zhu S, Li W, Liu J, Chen CH, Liao Q, Xu P, et al. Genome-Scale Deletion Screening of Human Long Non-Coding RNAs Using a Paired-Guide RNA CRISPR-Cas9 Library. Nat Biotechnol (2016) 34(12):1279–86. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

248. Chen B, Deng S, Ge T, Ye M, Yu J, Lin S, et al. Live Cell Imaging and Proteomic Profiling of Endogenous NEAT1 lncRNA by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knock-in. Protein Cell (2020) 11(9):641–60. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00706-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

249. Jiang W, von Roemeling CA, Chen Y, Qie Y, Liu X, Chen J, et al. Designing Nanomedicine for Immuno-Oncology. Nat BioMed Eng (2017) 1(2):29. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

250. Nam J, Son S, Park KS, Zou W, Shea LD, Moon JJ. Cancer Nanomedicine for Combination Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Mater (2019) 4(6):398–414. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0108-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

251. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer Immunotherapy Using Checkpoint Blockade. Science (2018) 359(6382):1350–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

252. Ma H, Chang H, Yang W, Lu Y, Hu J, Jin S. A Novel Ifnα-Induced Long Noncoding RNA Negatively Regulates Immunosuppression by Interrupting H3K27 Acetylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol Cancer (2020) 19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1123-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

253. Dammes N, Peer D. Paving the Road for RNA Therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2020) 41(10):755–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

254. Liu C, Zhou Y, Ji X, Xie H, Song H. Nanobooster-Encapsulated Hybrid RNA as Anti-Tumor Viral Mimicry. Nano Today (2021) 38:101211. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

255. Riley RS, June CH, Langer R, Mitchell MJ. Delivery Technologies for Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2019) 18(3):175–96. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0006-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

256. Ali OA, Huebsch N, Cao L, Dranoff G, Mooney DJ. Infection-Mimicking Materials to Program Dendritic Cells in Situ. Nat Mater (2009) 8(2):151–8. doi: 10.1038/nmat2357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

257. Ali OA, Emerich D, Dranoff G, Mooney DJ. In Situ Regulation of DC Subsets and T Cells Mediates Tumor Regression in Mice. Sci Transl Med (2009) 1(8):8ra19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

258. Ji X, Guo D, Ma J, Yin M, Yu Y, Liu C, et al. Epigenetic Remodeling Hydrogel Patches for Multidrug-Resistant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Adv Mater (2021) 33(18):e2100949. doi: 10.1002/adma.202100949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

259. Kim J, Li WA, Choi Y, Lewin SA, Verbeke CS, Dranoff G, et al. Injectable, Spontaneously Assembling, Inorganic Scaffolds Modulate Immune Cells In Vivo and Increase Vaccine Efficacy. Nat Biotechnol (2015) 33(1):64–72. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

260. Hori Y, Winans AM, Huang CC, Horrigan EM, Irvine DJ. Injectable Dendritic Cell-Carrying Alginate Gels for Immunization and Immunotherapy. Biomaterials (2008) 29(27):3671–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

261. Irvine DJ, Dane EL. Enhancing Cancer Immunotherapy With Nanomedicine. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(5):321–34. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0269-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

262. Vaidya AM, Sun Z, Ayat N, Schilb A, Liu X, Jiang H, et al. Systemic Delivery of Tumor-Targeting siRNA Nanoparticles Against an Oncogenic LncRNA Facilitates Effective Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy. Bioconjug Chem (2019) 30(3):907–19. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

263. Zuo X, Chen Z, Gao W, Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang J, et al. M6A-Mediated Upregulation of LINC00958 Increases Lipogenesis and Acts as a Nanotherapeutic Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol (2020) 13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0839-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

264. Ji X, Zhou Y, Li Q, Song H, Fan C. Protein-Mimicking Nanoparticles for a Cellular Regulation of Homeostasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces (2021) 13(27):31331–6. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c09281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

265. Kulkarni JA, Witzigmann D, Thomson SB, Chen S, Leavitt BR, Cullis PR, et al. The Current Landscape of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics. Nat Nanotechnol (2021) 16(6):630–43. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00898-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

266. O'Brien K, Breyne K, Ughetto S, Laurent LC, Breakefield XO. RNA Delivery by Extracellular Vesicles in Mammalian Cells and its Applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2020) 21(10):585–606. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0251-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

267. Chen F, Chen J, Yang L, Liu J, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Extracellular Vesicle-Packaged HIF-1α-Stabilizing lncRNA From Tumour-Associated Macrophages Regulates Aerobic Glycolysis of Breast Cancer Cells. Nat Cell Biol (2019) 21(4):498–510. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0299-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar