Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Immunol., 17 February 2022
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders

A Hypothesis Regarding Neurosecretory Inhibition of Stress Mediators by Colchicine in Preventing Stress-Induced Familial Mediterranean Fever Attacks

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Kutahya Health Science University, Kutahya, Turkey

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterized by recurrent episodes of fever and serositis. Colchicine (Col) has a crucial role in the prevention of amyloidosis and FMF attacks. The effect of Col on innate immune cells is based on the inhibition of the microtubule system. The microtubule system is also very important for neurosecretory functions. The inhibitory effect of Col on neurosecretory functions is an overlooked issue. Considering that the neuroimmune cross-talk process plays a role in the development of inflammatory diseases, the effect of Col on the neuronal system becomes important. FMF attacks are related to emotional stress. Therefore, the effect of Col on stress mediators is taken into consideration. In this hypothetical review, we discuss the possible effects of Col on the central nervous systems (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS) in light of mostly experimental study findings using animal models. Studies to be carried out on this subject will shed light on the pathogenesis of FMF attacks and the other possible mechanisms of action of Col apart from the anti-inflammatory features.

Introduction

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a common, Mendelian-inherited monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterized by irregular attacks of paroxysmal fever and serositis (1). AA amyloidosis is a dreadful complication of FMF. Colchicine (Col) has been shown to prevent attacks and the development of amyloidosis (2), but when given during FMF attacks, Col cannot end the attacks (2, 3). We do not know the exact reason for this situation. However, it is interesting to note that Col has been shown to alleviate gout arthritis attacks within a short time (3). It is well known that gout, similar to FMF, is a disease that develops due to inflammasome activation and benefits from interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist drugs (4). Why does Col not act immediately in FMF attacks as it does in gout attacks? Some researchers have tried to explain why Col does not act immediately in FMF attacks. Ben Chetrit et al. suggested that the immediate anti-inflammatory effect of Col requires interaction with tubulins, which occurs at a low dose of Col. However, the inhibition of genes involved in inflammation at the transcriptional level occurs at higher doses and is observed after 12-24 hours. They suggested that these reasons might explain why Col is not effective when given during the occurrence of an FMF attack (5). However, we do not know exactly whether these inflammatory genes, apart from caspase-1 (CASP-1), have a specific role in the development of FMF attacks. Furthermore, in this study, the authors used human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to study the effects of Col on global gene expression. Although neutrophils and HUVECs may have similar repertoires of expressed genes, their behaviour towards an inflammatory stimulus is different. For instance, exposure to epinephrine (EPI) in vitro increases IL-8 expression and CD11b (alpha M integrin) levels in human neutrophils (6). On the other hand, EPI facilitates the downmodulation of adhesion molecule expression in HUVECs, reducing neutrophil adhesion (7). Moreover, in contrast to the abovementioned study, Col increased proinflammatory gene expression in vitro in neutrophils and showed its anti-inflammatory effect only through the inhibition of CASP-1 activation (8). These observations suggest the requirement of another explanation of why Col is ineffective when given during an FMF attack.

We believe that it would be more appropriate to look at this mystery in the context of triggers that initiate FMF attacks, and the effect of Col should be evaluated within this context. Approximately two-thirds of patients with FMF reported that their attacks were triggered by emotional stress or other psychological causes (917). Interestingly, years ago, the triggering of FMF attacks with the synthetic sympathomimetic drug metaraminol, which was used as a diagnostic test (18), suggested that there might be a relationship between inborn error of catecholamine metabolism and FMF attacks. In one study, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors reduced the attack frequency in patients with colchicine-unresponsive FMF who also had depression (13). The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) stated that periods of physical or emotional stress can trigger FMF attacks, and it may be appropriate to increase the dose of Col temporarily (19). The most important question to be asked here is that if emotional stress is a factor in the emergence of FMF attacks, is the prophylactic effect of Col due to its effect on the sympathoadrenal system in addition to its anti-inflammatory effects?

The role of Col at this stage is its connection with the microtubule system. Microtubules are key parts of cellular functions, including the maintenance of cell shape, cell migration, and cytokine release and transport (20). Microtubules are indispensable in the axonal transport of catecholamines and other amines in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS) (21). The effects of Col have been explained by its action on tubulin disruption, which causes the downregulation of multiple inflammatory pathways and the modulation of innate immunity (22). This review outlines the role of Col in the CNS and PNS in terms of its neurosecretory inhibitor role and discusses the prophylactic effect of Col on stress-induced FMF attacks through this mechanism, in addition to its anti-inflammatory properties.

Stress as a Stimulator of Neuroimmune Cross-Talk Process

Stress, in an ‘integrated definition’, is ‘a group of events, consisting of a stimulus (stressor), that triggers a reaction in the brain (stress perception), that activates the physiologic fight or flight system in the body’ (23). Following exposure to emotional stress, the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is activated and releases EPI and norepinephrine (NE) into the circulation. These stress-responsive hormones affect the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neuroendocrine and immune systems to elicit ‘fight or flight’ action (23). It is well known that there is neural-immune cross-talk in inflammatory diseases. Neuroanatomic and neurochemical studies have shown that primary and secondary lymphoid organs such as the bone marrow, thymus, spleen, lymph nodes, and gut are innervated by sympathetic nerve fibres (24). The activation of postganglionic splenic sympathetic nerve fibres leads to the release of NE at the neuroimmune junction (25). The stress hormones EPI and NE released from both the CNS and PNS can activate inflammatory pathways, including the pyrin inflammasome, by binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) on inflammatory cells. GPCRs belong to the largest cell surface receptor family and regulate intracellular signalling cascades in response to neurotransmitters and hormones (26). Ras homologous protein guanosine triphosphate (RhoA) modification is one of the most important roles of GPCRs in FMF (27). As mentioned below, RhoA alteration can activate or inhibit the pyrin inflammasome (28).

What evidence exists that stress causes inflammation in healthy people? Laboratory studies showed that acute stress was associated with significant increases in IL-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-6, and TNF-α (29). Bierhaus et al. looked into the mechanisms that turn psychosocial stress into mononuclear cell activation (30). NF-kB was immediately elicited by stress exposure in 17 of 19 individuals, along with higher levels of catecholamines and cortisol, and recovered to baseline within 60 minutes. In two patients who did not have an increase in catecholamines and cortisol, there was no increase in NF-kB binding activity. Another study found that acute psychologic stress elevated circulating levels of IL-6 and IL-1β, and that β blockers could attenuate this reaction (31).

However, we can’t say for sure that stress mediators EPI and NE produce inflammation in all tissues and under all circumstances. These effects are influenced by both tissue and environmental factors. In an experimental arthritic animal model, EPI can lower the expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1β, and IL-6 (32). However, alpha adrenergic receptors are important in neutrophil migration and peritoneal tissue inflammation caused by monosodium urate crystals (33). These examples demonstrate that catecholamines can have a variety of tissue- and condition-specific effects.

Various studies have looked into the impact of the immune system on the neural system, which is the opposite side of neuroimmune cross-talk. Immune system activation is accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic, autonomic, and endocrine systems. IL-1 has been identified as a key cytokine that transports immune activation to the brain in several studies (34, 35). Il-1 has been shown to influence hypothalamic neurosecretory activity and enhance the turnover of NE in the hypothalamus (3638). Il-1 also has an effect on the hypothalamus’s synthesis of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH). CRH can then influence the HPA axis, causing stress hormone levels to rise (39, 40). In the CNS, IL-1 can activate a number of downstream pathways, including the MAPK and NF-kB pathways (41, 42). IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α all regulate HPA axis activation, which is influenced by glucocorticoid release (43).

The Effect of Colchicine on the Central Nervous System

It is well known that the SNS and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis are two major pathways that mediate a close relationship between the CNS and immune system (IS) (24). Both pathways are controlled by limbic and autonomic tracks known to mediate the effects of stressors on body functions (24). Sympathetic activation either pharmacologically or through physical or psychosocial stressors can significantly alter immune function (44). Stimulating or blocking the activity of autonomic/limbic brain regions/nuclei known to regulate autonomic/neuroendocrine outflow also alters measures of immune function (45). The inhibitory effects of Col on axonal flow and various types of secretion are well known. In light of this information, it would be reasonable to examine whether the effect of Col may play a preventive role in stress-related FMF attacks.

Although Col has a lipophilic structure, its brain-blood barrier (BBB) penetration is very low (46). A pump protein located on the luminal side of the BBB called P-170 glycoprotein (P-GP) limits the transport of Col across the BBB (47). In a post-mortem study of patients who died due to Col toxicity, Col was detected at 5 ng/g in brain tissue, 396 ng/g in the kidney, and 347 ng/g in the liver (48). On the other hand, a toxicokinetic study reported that the Col level was greater than 600 ng g-1 in bone marrow, 400 ng g-1 in the testicles, 250 ng g-1 in the spleen, and 200 ng g-1 in the kidneys. Col was also found in the brain at 125 ng g-1 (49). As a result, the transport of Col to brain tissue is less than that to other tissues. However, despite this low transportation, Col may be useful in some intracranial inflammatory conditions. For example, Col may have a beneficial effect in patients with FMF with recurrent meningitis called Mollaret’s meningitis (50, 51). This example demonstrates that Col, even at therapeutic doses, may be beneficial in FMF-related intracerebral inflammatory conditions.

Neurosecretory functions in the brain occur through axonal transport, and brain functions are dependent on this process. The microtubule system plays an important role in these neurosecretory functions. It is known that the paraventricular nuclei (PVN) receive dense catecholaminergic innervation originating from noradrenergic and adrenergic cell groups in the lower brain stem (52, 53). The functional effects of Col on the entire neurosecretory tract and various hypothalamic nuclei have been studied. One of the actions of Col is the inhibition of the proximo-distal transport of catecholamine-containing dense-core vesicles. The perturbation in axonal flow was shown by the accumulation of neurosecretory material (53). It is well known that reserpine is an adrenergic blocking agent used to treat mild-to-moderate hypertension via the disruption of NE vesicular storage. The antihypertensive action of reserpine is a result of its ability to deplete catecholamines from peripheral sympathetic nerve endings. Similar to reserpine, Col also inhibits central catecholamine release. However, this occurs later with Col than with reserpine (54). There are experimental studies in the literature that strengthen this view (5557). Abdelmalek et al. reported a decrease in blood pressure by injecting Col into the “anterior forebrain” of rats. They argued that this developed through an inhibition of the central component of the SNS by Col (55). Col achieves these effects by disrupting the transport of NE in central noradrenergic neurons (56). Intrahypothalamic administration of Col may cause behavioural changes in rats. The reason for this is the disruption of catecholamine transport by Col (57). In conscious rats, the administration of Col into the diagonal band of Broca, which has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of hydromineral balance, and in particular, in the regulation of arterial pressure, decreases the arterial pressure responses to both alpha-2 (α-2) and β-adrenergic agonists. The authors have explained this situation by a deterioration of the neural information process by Col (58). In conclusion, Col may limit catecholamine discharge by disrupting the neurosecretory transport process through its effect on the microtubule system in the CNS.

The Effect of Colchicine on the Peripheral Nervous System and Adrenal Glands

Under stress, NE is released from the sympathetic ganglia, while EPI and dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) are secreted from the adrenal medulla. Col prevents the release of neurotransmitters, particularly noradrenaline, from stimulated sympathetic fibres (59) and similarly inhibits catecholamine release from the adrenal medulla (60). It has been reported that electrical stimulation of the hypogastric nerve increases the release of both dopamine beta-hydroxylase and NE (59). However, when the test was repeated after Col was given to the experimental animals, the release of both mediators was completely inhibited. Such an inhibitory effect of Col has been reported in various types of secretions: insulin (61), histamine from mast cells (62), and collagen from osteoblasts (63, 64). As a result, these kinds of studies at the molecular level have led to the use of Col in various diseases. For instance, Col can be used as an antifibrotic or antiurticarial drug due to these kinds of effects in clinical practice (65, 66).

Balanced function of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems is very important in cardiac electrophysiology. Cardiac autonomic functions can be evaluated with the heart rate recovery index (HRRI), heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate turbulence (HRT), and QT dynamics (67). Tochinai et al. showed that the RR and QRS intervals were prolonged on electrocardiography (ECG) in rats exposed to Col. They also found an increase in the high-frequency component as evidence of an increase in parasympathetic tone (68). No studies have directly evaluated the effect of Col on the autonomic nervous system in humans. However, some studies have evaluated cardiac autonomic status in patients with FMF using Col. Rosenbaum et al. showed that some of the patients with FMF had autonomic dysfunction in the form of postural tachycardia syndrome and cardioinhibitory and orthostatic hypotension due to dysautonomia independent of amyloidosis. The authors did not comment on whether Col played a role in these results (69). In another study, delayed recovery of heart rate and abnormal HRV and HRT parameters were found in attack-free patients with FMF. Although the authors attributed these changes to the inflammatory feature of the disease, they did not discuss whether Col would affect these results (67). However, contrary to these studies, some studies did not detect a problem related to dysautonomia in FMF patients (70, 71). The results in the clinical studies are inconsistent with each other because of the heterogeneity of demographic characteristics, differences in Col dose, and other disease characteristics of FMF patients. Therefore, studies that directly evaluate the effect of Col on cardiac autonomic functions by eliminating all other confounding factors are needed.

On the other hand, examples found in Col-related toxicity reports can provide some clues. For example, patients with Col toxicity may experience hypotension due to a decrease in vascular resistance. One of the cardiac effects of Col is bradycardia, and this side effect has been explained by the predominance of the parasympathetic system (72, 73). However, arrhythmias and tachycardia were also detected in some patients.

Barakat et al. were the first researchers to mention the role of catecholamines in the pathogenesis of FMF and to show that Col changes catecholamine levels in FMF patients. They found lower plasma EPI and NE levels in FMF patients using Col than in those not using Col (74). Moreover, urinary metanephrine levels were also lower in patients using Col. Again, the same investigators found that dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH) activity was higher in untreated attack-free patients and patients with attacks than in healthy controls. They have also shown that Col reduced DBH activity (75). These results suggest that the sympathoadrenal system may have a role in the pathogenesis of FMF and that Col interferes with this process.

The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Colchicine on FMF-Related Inflammation

The Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV), which encodes the pyrin protein, is linked to FMF. Although the mechanisms of pyrin inflammasome activation are not completely understood, one of the most compelling explanations for pyrin regulation is one involving changes in host Rho GTPase activity. PKN1 and PKN2, which are RhoA-dependent serine/threonine protein kinases, directly phosphorylate pyrin at Ser208 and Ser242. Pyrin comes into touch with the chaperone proteins 14-3-3ϵ and 14-3-3 τ as a result of this. This interaction keeps pyrin in an inactive state. When RhoA is inactivated by bacterial toxins or stress mediators, PKN1 and PKN2 activity decreases, resulting in lower amounts of phosphorylated pyrin. This freed pyrin from the inhibitory 14-3-3 proteins, allowing an active pyrin inflammasome to develop faster (28) (Figure 1). This will lead to caspase-1 activation and release of IL-1β and IL-18. Col either stimulates RhoA directly or reverses the C3 toxin-induced suppression of RhoA activity (28). It accomplishes this by enhancing the release and activation of guanine-nucleotide-excange factor (GEF)-H1 from depolymerized microtubules (76). Col also controls the innate inflammatory response by inhibiting intracellular signaling pathways such as NF-kB and caspase-1 (77). Col inhibits rolling, adhesion, motility, phagocytic, and some cytokine secretory capabilities of leukocytes, as well as modifies adhesion protein expression (e.g., E-selectin, L-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) (78, 79). Furthermore, Col blocks pro-inflammatory cascades by inhibiting the activation of purinergic receptors P2X2 and P2X7 (80) (Table 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the effects of colchicine on the sympathoadrenal medullar axis and postneuronal inflammatory pathways. Paraventricular nuclei (PVN) and the locus coeruleus (LC) receive dense catecholaminergic innervation originating from noradrenergic and adrenergic cell groups in the lower brain stem. Following exposure to stress, the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and sympathoadrenal medullar axis (SAM) are activated. In the SAM axis, preganglionic sympathetic neurons secrete acetylcholine in the adrenal medulla, which stimulates the release of catecholamines, predominantly epinephrine (EPI) and, to a much lesser extent, norepinephrine (NE), into the circulation. Postganglionic sympathetic neurons also predominantly secrete NE. It is well known that sympathetic noradrenergic nerves innervate primary and secondary lymphoid organs. Circulating NE/EPI can potentiate the actions of sympathetic nerves acting at adrenergic receptors in immune organs. These stress mediators may activate the inflammasome and other inflammation pathways by binding to adrenergic receptors expressed on immune cells in a synapse-like fashion or following diffusion through the parenchyma of the innervated tissue. Colchicine (Col), at the neuronal level, inhibits catecholamine transportation through the CNS and PNS and prevents the release of EPI from the adrenal glands (neuronal effect). At the postneuronal level, Col keeps the pyrin inflammasome in an inactive form by activating RhoA. Thus, it inhibits caspase-1 activation and IL-1β release. Col inhibits the NF-kB inflammation pathway and neutrophil adhesion, extravasation, and recruitment by altering neutrophil L-selectin expression and endothelial cell E-selectin distribution. Hypothalamic-hypophyseal-adrenal axis response to stress and its mediators are not presented in this figure. GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; CNS, Central nervous system; PNS, Peripheral nervous system. Created with BioRender.com.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 The effects of colchicine on neuronal and post neuronal levels.

Discussion and Future Perspectives

Neuronal regulation of immunity and inflammation is a rapidly growing field, with significant opportunities for new discoveries. It is reasonable that the future will bring new ways of neuromodulator therapy to target diseases currently treated with drugs (81). The abovementioned data suggest that Col can affect the neurosecretory functions of neurons without damaging the neuronal structure. Influencing catecholamine release is one of these effects. In line with this information, the role of Col in preventing stress-induced FMF attacks may be due to its effect on the neural system in addition to anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 1).

The fact that Col does not act immediately during an attack may be related to the fact that previously released catecholamines activate inflammation mechanisms until Col penetrates neural tissue. In stressful situations, catecholamines enter the circulation in a very short time. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of Col on neuronal tissue may be delayed for up to 20-24 hours (82).

Col peaks in plasma 1 hour after oral intake, and a second peak occurs at 6 hours due to enterohepatic circulation (83). The concentration of Col in neutrophils is 60-600 times higher than that in plasma (84), which is because the P-glycoprotein efflux pump system is absent in the neutrophil membrane. The biological effect of a single dose of 1 mg Col appears at 47 hours (85). The late emergence of the biological effect of Col can be suggested as a reason why Col does not show an immediate impact when given during FMF attacks. However, this suggestion seems to be open to question because Col shows its effect quickly in gout attacks. It seems difficult to explain this paradoxical situation with the late emergence of the biological effect of Col in neutrophils. This may be related to the direct effect of Col on the inflammation pathways activated by uric acid. Gout is an IL-1-mediated autoinflammatory disease caused by the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and NF-kB pathway (86). Col prevents neutrophil chemotaxis by binding to tubulin and inhibits the initial phase of crystal induced inflammation in gout (87). This feature may provide an advantage to Col to heal gout attacks in a short time. However, a wide variety of neuroendocrine and neuroimmune events develop during stress, and these events affect inflammation pathways through a wide variety of mechanisms (88). Therefore, stress mediators may have multiple roles in activating the inflammasome and other inflammation pathways in FMF rather than a few pathways (89).

It can be speculated that Col may not be equally effective on all pathways; therefore, it cannot end attacks within a short time. Based on the fact that colchicine is effective when given before attacks, not during attacks, Col acts through stress mediators in preventing stress-related FMF attacks.

Our hypothesis regarding the inhibition of the neurosecretory transportation of catecholamines may be an alternative explanation for the prevention of FMF attacks. One of the questions to be asked here is, does this neurosecretory inhibitory effect of Col not affect physiological functions? Interestingly, while this effect of Col is not observed in basal physiological conditions, it is more apparent when the basic secretory activity of the cells is more marked (90).

Given the effect of Col on the CNS and PNS, it is necessary to seek answers to some questions. How do catecholamine levels progress in stress and nonstress periods in FMF patients using or not using Col? Is there a difference in catecholamine levels between Col-resistant FMF patients and Col-responsive FMF patients? Could there be a problem with the neural tissue penetration of Col in Col-resistant patients? How important are MEFV variant differences in the stress response?

In conclusion, in addition to its anti-inflammatory properties at the post neuronal level, Col can prevent the occurrence of stress-related attacks by reducing the transport/release of stress mediators at the neuronal level (Table 1). While studies with stress mediators will increase the knowledge on this subject, answering the abovementioned questions will both shed light on the pathogenesis of FMF and lead to new treatment options.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

CK conceived the idea, formulated the theory, wrote the manuscript. DÜC and GBC contributed original data, discussed the data, and drew the illustrations, and critically revised it. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study has been partially funded by The Turkish Society of Rheumatology.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sonmez HE, Batu ED, Ozen S. Familial Mediterranean Fever: Current Perspectives. J Inflamm Res (2016) 9:13–20. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S91352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ben-Chetrit E, Levy M. Colchicine: 1998 Update. Semin Arthritis Rheum (1998) 28(1):48–59. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(98)80028-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ozturk MA, Kanbay M, Kasapoglu B, Onat AM, Guz G, Furst DE, et al. Therapeutic Approach to Familial Mediterranean Fever: A Review Update. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2011) 29(4 Suppl 67):S77–86.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

4. So A, De Smedt T, Revaz S, Tschopp J. A Pilot Study of IL-1 Inhibition by Anakinra in Acute Gout. Arthritis Res Ther (2007) 9(2):R28. doi: 10.1186/ar2143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ben-Chetrit E, Bergmann S, Sood R. Mechanism of the Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Colchicine in Rheumatic Diseases: A Possible New Outlook Through Microarray Analysis. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2006) 45(3):274–82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei140

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Margaryan S, Hyusyan A, Martirosyan A, Sargsian S, Manukyan G. Differential Modulation of Innate Immune Response by Epinephrine and Estradiol. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig (2017) 30(3):1-6. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2016-0046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Trabold B, Lunz D, Gruber M, Frohlich D, Graf B. Immunomodulation of Neutrophil-Endothelial Interaction by Inotropes. Injury (2010) 41(10):1079–83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Manukyan G, Petrek M, Tomankova T, Martirosyan A, Tatyan M, Navratilova Z, et al. Colchicine Modulates Expression of Pro-Inflammatory Genes in Neutrophils From Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever and Healthy Subjects. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2013) 27(2):329–36.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

9. Schwabe AD, Peters RS. Familial Mediterranean Fever in Armenians. Analysis of 100 Cases. Med (Baltimore) (1974) 53(6):453–62. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197411000-00005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Karadag O, Tufan A, Yazisiz V, Ureten K, Yilmaz S, Cinar M, et al. The Factors Considered as Trigger for the Attacks in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever. Rheumatol Int (2013) 33(4):893–7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2453-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gidron Y, Berkovitch M, Press J. Psychosocial Correlates of Incidence of Attacks in Children With Familial Mediterranean Fever. J Behav Med (2003) 26(2):95–104. doi: 10.1023/a:1023038504481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Makay B, Emiroglu N, Unsal E. Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents With Familial Mediterranean Fever. Clin Rheumatol (2010) 29(4):375–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1330-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Onat AM, Ozturk MA, Ozcakar L, Ureten K, Kaymak SU, Kiraz S, et al. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Reduce the Attack Frequency in Familial Mediterranean Fever. Tohoku J Exp Med (2007) 211(1):9–14. doi: 10.1620/tjem.211.9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yenokyan G, Armenian HK. Triggers for Attacks in Familial Mediterranean Fever: Application of the Case-Crossover Design. Am J Epidemiol (2012) 175(10):1054–61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cebicci H, Sahan M, Gurbuz S, Karaca B, Karakus A, Tomruk Sutbeyaz S, et al. Triggers for Attacks in Familial Mediterranean Fever: Are There Any Regional or Ethnic Differences? Acta Med Mediterr (2014) 30:1349–53.

Google Scholar

16. Avagyan T, Budumyan A, Hayrapetyan A, Tadevosyan A. Influence of Some Environmental Factors on the Manifestation of Familial Mediterranean Fever in Children: Clinical and Genetic Aspects. Caucasus J Health Sci Public Health (2018) 2:1–5.

Google Scholar

17. Siegal S. Familial Paroxysmal Polyserositis. Analysis of Fifty Cases. Am J Med (1964) 36:893–918. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(64)90119-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Barakat MH, El-Khawad AO, Gumaa KA, El-Sobki NI, Fenech FF. Metaraminol Provocative Test: A Specific Diagnostic Test for Familial Mediterranean Fever. Lancet (1984) 1(8378):656–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92172-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, Livneh A, Ben-Chetrit E, Giancane G, et al. EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Familial Mediterranean Fever. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75(4):644–51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gelfand VI, Bershadsky AD. Microtubule Dynamics: Mechanism, Regulation, and Function. Annu Rev Cell Biol (1991) 7:93–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.000521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Dalbeth N, Lauterio TJ, Wolfe HR. Mechanism of Action of Colchicine in the Treatment of Gout. Clin Ther (2014) 36(10):1465–79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Slobodnick A, Shah B, Krasnokutsky S, Pillinger MH. Update on Colchicine, 2017. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2018) 57(suppl_1):i4–i11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex453

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dhabhar FS. The Power of Positive Stress - a Complementary Commentary. Stress (2019) 22(5):526–9. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2019.1634049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bellinger DL, Lorton D. Autonomic Regulation of Cellular Immune Function. Auton Neurosci (2014) 182:15–41. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2014.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Pernow J, Schwieler J, Kahan T, Hjemdahl P, Oberle J, Wallin BG, et al. Influence of Sympathetic Discharge Pattern on Norepinephrine and Neuropeptide Y Release. Am J Physiol (1989) 257(3 Pt 2):H866–72. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.3.H866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hilger D, Masureel M, Kobilka BK. Structure and Dynamics of GPCR Signaling Complexes. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2018) 25(1):4–12. doi: 10.1038/s41594-017-0011-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Yu OM, Brown JH. G Protein-Coupled Receptor and RhoA-Stimulated Transcriptional Responses: Links to Inflammation, Differentiation, and Cell Proliferation. Mol Pharmacol (2015) 88(1):171–80. doi: 10.1124/mol.115.097857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Park YH, Wood G, Kastner DL, Chae JJ. Pyrin Inflammasome Activation and RhoA Signaling in the Autoinflammatory Diseases FMF and HIDS. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(8):914–21. doi: 10.1038/ni.3457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Maydych V, Claus M, Dychus N, Ebel M, Damaschke J, Diestel S, et al. Impact of Chronic and Acute Academic Stress on Lymphocyte Subsets and Monocyte Function. PloS One (2017) 12(11):e0188108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bierhaus A, Wolf J, Andrassy M, Rohleder N, Humpert PM, Petrov D, et al. A Mechanism Converting Psychosocial Stress Into Mononuclear Cell Activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100(4):1920–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0438019100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Steptoe A, Hamer M, Chida Y. The Effects of Acute Psychological Stress on Circulating Inflammatory Factors in Humans: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Behav Immun (2007) 21(7):901–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ahsan H, Irfan HM, Alamgeer, Jahan S, Shahzad M, Asim MH. Potential of Ephedrine to Suppress the Gene Expression of TNF-Alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6 and PGE2: A Novel Approach Towards Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Life Sci (2021) 282:119825. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Duan L, Chen J, Razavi M, Wei Y, Tao Y, Rao X, et al. Alpha2B-Adrenergic Receptor Regulates Neutrophil Recruitment in MSU-Induced Peritoneal Inflammation. Front Immunol (2019) 10:501. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Besedovsky H, del Rey A, Sorkin E, Dinarello CA. Immunoregulatory Feedback Between Interleukin-1 and Glucocorticoid Hormones. Science (1986) 233(4764):652–4. doi: 10.1126/science.3014662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Schettini G. Interleukin 1 in the Neuroendocrine System: From Gene to Function. Prog Neuroendocrinimmunol (1990) 3:157–66.

Google Scholar

36. Berkenbosch F, Van Oers J, Del Rey A, Tilders F, Besedovsky H. Corticotropin-Releasing Factor-Producing Neurons in the Rat Activated by Interleukin-1. Science (1987) 238(4826):524–6. doi: 10.1126/science.2443979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Sapolsky R, Rivier C, Yamamoto G, Plotsky P, Vale W. Interleukin-1 Stimulates the Secretion of Hypothalamic Corticotropin-Releasing Factor. Science (1987) 238(4826):522–4. doi: 10.1126/science.2821621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Dunn AJ. Systematic Interleukin-1 Administration Stimulates Hypothalamic Norepinephrine Metabolism Parallelling the Increased Plasma Corticosterone. Life Sci (1988) 43(5):429–35. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(88)90522-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Dunn AJ, Wang J, Ando T. Effects of Cytokines on Cerebral Neurotransmission. Cytokines stress Depression (1999) 461:117–27. doi: 10.1007/978-0-585-37970-8_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. McEwen BS, Biron CA, Brunson KW, Bulloch K, Chambers WH, Dhabhar FS, et al. The Role of Adrenocorticoids as Modulators of Immune Function in Health and Disease: Neural, Endocrine and Immune Interactions. Brain Res Rev (1997) 23(1-2):79–133. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(96)00012-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Srinivasan D, Yen JH, Joseph DJ, Friedman W. Cell Type-Specific Interleukin-1beta Signaling in the CNS. J Neurosci (2004) 24(29):6482–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5712-03.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Miggin SM, Pålsson-McDermott E, Dunne A, Jefferies C, Pinteaux E, Banahan K, et al. NF-κb Activation by the Toll-IL-1 Receptor Domain Protein MyD88 Adapter-Like is Regulated by Caspase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2007) 104(9):3372–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608100104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sternberg E. Eurosterone Meeting. Neuroendocrine Regulation of Autoimmune/Inflammatory Disease. J Endocrinol (2001) 169:429–35. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1690429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kemeny ME, Schedlowski M. Understanding the Interaction Between Psychosocial Stress and Immune-Related Diseases: A Stepwise Progression. Brain Behav Immun (2007) 21(8):1009–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.07.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Felten DL. Neurotransmitter Signaling of Cells of the Immune System: Important Progress, Major Gaps. Brain Behav Immun (1991) 5(1):2–8. doi: 10.1016/0889-1591(91)90003-s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Matsuyama SS, Braun LD, Oldendorf WH, Fu T-k, Jarvik LF. Colchicine and the Blood Brain Barrier: Implications for Alzheimer Patients. Age (1989) 12(3):107–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02432374

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Begley DJ, Lechardeur D, Chen ZD, Rollinson C, Bardoul M, Roux F, et al. Functional Expression of P-Glycoprotein in an Immortalised Cell Line of Rat Brain Endothelial Cells, RBE4. J Neurochem (1996) 67(3):988–95. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67030988.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Dehon B, Chagnon JL, Vinner E, Pommery J, Mathieu D, Lhermitte M. Colchicine Poisoning: Report of a Fatal Case With Body Fluid and Post-Mortem Tissue Analysis by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. BioMed Chromatogr (1999) 13(3):235–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0801(199905)13:3<235::AID-BMC827>3.0.CO;2-N

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Rochdi M, Sabouraud A, Baud FJ, Bismuth C, Scherrmann JM. Toxicokinetics of Colchicine in Humans: Analysis of Tissue, Plasma and Urine Data in Ten Cases. Hum Exp Toxicol (1992) 11(6):510–6. doi: 10.1177/096032719201100612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Vilaseca J, Tor J, Guardia J, Bacardi R. Periodic Meningitis and Familial Mediterranean Fever. Arch Intern Med (1982) 142(2):378–9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1982.00340150178031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Mora JS, Gimeno A. Mollaret Meningitis: Report of a Case With Recovery After Colchicine. Ann Neurol (1980) 8(6):631–3. doi: 10.1002/ana.410080616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Cunningham ET Jr, Bohn MC, Sawchenko PE. Organization of Adrenergic Inputs to the Paraventricular and Supraoptic Nuclei of the Hypothalamus in the Rat. J Comp Neurol (1990) 292(4):651–67. doi: 10.1002/cne.902920413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Hokfelt T, Fuxe K, Goldstein M, Johansson O. Evidence for Adrenaline Neurons in the Rat Brain. Acta Physiol Scand (1973) 89(2):286–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05522.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ceccatelli S, Cortes R, Hokfelt T. Effect of Reserpine and Colchicine on Neuropeptide mRNA Levels in the Rat Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res (1991) 9(1-2):57–69. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(91)90130-p

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Abdelmalek A, Forsling ML, Thornton SN. Colchicine Injected Into the Anterior Forebrain in Rats Decreases Blood Pressure Without Changing the Responses to Haemorrhage. Brain Res Bull (1994) 34(3):313–7. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90069-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sorimachi M, Hino O, Tsunekawa K. Colchicine may Interfere With the Axonal Transport of Noradrenaline in the Central Noradrenergic Neurons. Experientia (1977) 33(5):649–50. doi: 10.1007/BF01946553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Willis GL, Smith GC. Short-Term Effects of Intrahypothalamic Colchicine. Brain Res (1983) 276(1):119–25. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90553-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Abdelmalek A, Ayad G, Thornton SN. Cardiovascular Effects of Catecholamines Injected Into the DBB of Rats, Influence of Urethane Anaesthesia and Local Colchicine. Brain Res (1999) 821(1):50–9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01057-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Thoa NB, Wooten GF, Axelrod J, Kopin IJ. Inhibition of Release of Dopamine- -Hydroxylase and Norepinephrine From Sympathetic Nerves by Colchicine, Vinblastine, or Cytochalasin-B (Hypogastric Nerve Stimulation-Exocytosis-Microtubules-Microfilaments-Guinea Pig). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1972) 69(2):520–2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Poisner AM, Bernstein J. A Possible Role of Microtubules in Catecholamine Release From the Adrenal Medulla: Effect of Colchicine, Vinca Alkaloids and Deuterium Oxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1971) 177(1):102–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

61. Lacy PE, Howell SL, Young DA, Fink CJ. New Hypothesis of Insulin Secretion. Nature (1968) 219(5159):1177–9. doi: 10.1038/2191177a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Gillespie E, Levine RJ, Malawista SE. Histamine Release From Rat Peritoneal Mast Cells: Inhibition by Colchicine and Potentiation by Deuterium Oxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1968) 164(1):158–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

63. Ehrlich HP, Bornstein P. Microtubules in Transcellular Movement of Procollagen. Nat New Biol (1972) 238(87):257–60. doi: 10.1038/newbio238257a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Scherft JP, Heersche JN. Accumulation of Collagen-Containing Vacuoles in Osteoblasts After Administration of Colchicine. Cell Tissue Res (1975) 157(3):353–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00225526

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Kershenobich D, Vargas F, Garcia-Tsao G, Perez Tamayo R, Gent M, Rojkind M. Colchicine in the Treatment of Cirrhosis of the Liver. N Engl J Med (1988) 318(26):1709–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806303182602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Nabavizadeh SH, Babaeian M, Esmaeilzadeh H, Mortazavifar N, Alyasin S. Efficacy of the Colchicine Add-on Therapy in Patients With Autoimmune Chronic Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (2021) 34(6):e15119. doi: 10.1111/dth.15119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Canpolat U, Dural M, Aytemir K, Akdogan A, Kaya EB, Sahiner L, et al. Evaluation of Various Cardiac Autonomic Indices in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever on Colchicine Treatment. Auton Neurosci (2012) 167(1-2):70–4. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Tochinai R, Suzuki K, Nagata Y, Ando M, Hata C, Komatsu K, et al. Cardiotoxic Changes of Colchicine Intoxication in Rats: Electrocardiographic, Histopathological and Blood Chemical Analysis. J Toxicol Pathol (2014) 27(3-4):223–30. doi: 10.1293/tox.2014-0013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Rozenbaum M, Naschitz JE, Yudashkin M, Sabo E, Shaviv N, Gaitini L, et al. Cardiovascular Reactivity Score for the Assessment of Dysautonomia in Familial Mediterranean Fever. Rheumatol Int (2004) 24(3):147–52. doi: 10.1007/s00296-003-0344-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Nussinovitch N, Esev K, Lidar M, Nussinovitch U, Livneh A. Normal Heart Rate Variability in Colchicine-Resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever Patients. Isr Med Assoc J (2015) 17(5):306–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

71. Kaya H, Suner A, Koroglu S, Akcay A, Turkbeyler IH, Koleoglu M. Heart Rate Variability in Familial Mediterranean Fever Patients. Eur J Rheumatol (2014) 1(2):58–61. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheumatol.2014.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Mubayed L, Muller BA, Jacobson JL, Hast HA, Nguyen HH. Acute Pediatric Colchicine Toxicity is Associated With Marked Bradydysrhythmias. J Emerg Med (2018) 55(3):e65–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Aghabiklooei A, Zamani N, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Nasouhi S, Mashayekhian M. Acute Colchicine Overdose: Report of Three Cases. Reumatismo (2014) 65(6):307–11. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2013.720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Barakat MH, Malhas LN, Gumaa KK. Catecholamine Metabolism in Recurrent Hereditary Polyserositis. Pathogenesis of Acute Inflammation: The Retention-Leakage Hypothesis. BioMed Pharmacother (1989) 43(10):763–9. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(89)90165-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Barakat MH, Gumaa KA, Malhas LN, el-Sobki NI, Moussa MA, Fenech FF. Plasma Dopamine Beta-Hydroxylase: Rapid Diagnostic Test for Recurrent Hereditary Polyserositis. Lancet (1988) 2(8623):1280–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92893-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Krendel M, Zenke FT, Bokoch GM. Nucleotide Exchange Factor GEF-H1 Mediates Cross-Talk Between Microtubules and the Actin Cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol (2002) 4(4):294–301. doi: 10.1038/ncb773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Chae JJ, Wood G, Richard K, Jaffe H, Colburn NT, Masters SL, et al. The Familial Mediterranean Fever Protein, Pyrin, is Cleaved by Caspase-1 and Activates NF-kappaB Through its N-Terminal Fragment. Blood (2008) 112(5):1794–803. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Cronstein BN, Molad Y, Reibman J, Balakhane E, Levin RI, Weissmann G. Colchicine Alters the Quantitative and Qualitative Display of Selectins on Endothelial Cells and Neutrophils. J Clin Invest (1995) 96(2):994–1002. doi: 10.1172/JCI118147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Niel E, Scherrmann JM. Colchicine Today. Joint Bone Spine (2006) 73(6):672–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Marques-da-Silva C, Chaves MM, Castro NG, Coutinho-Silva R, Guimaraes MZ. Colchicine Inhibits Cationic Dye Uptake Induced by ATP in P2X2 and P2X7 Receptor-Expressing Cells: Implications for its Therapeutic Action. Br J Pharmacol (2011) 163(5):912–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01254.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural Regulation of Immunity: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Translation. Nat Neurosci (2017) 20(2):156–66. doi: 10.1038/nn.4477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Pilar G, Landmesser L. Axotomy Mimicked by Localized Colchicine Application. Science (1972) 177(4054):1116–8. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4054.1116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Ferron GM, Rochdi M, Jusko WJ, Scherrmann JM. Oral Absorption Characteristics and Pharmacokinetics of Colchicine in Healthy Volunteers After Single and Multiple Doses. J Clin Pharmacol (1996) 36(10):874–83. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04753.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Chappey O, Niel E, Dervichian M, Wautier JL, Scherrmann JM, Cattan D. Colchicine Concentration in Leukocytes of Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1994) 38(1):87–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04328.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Chappey ON, Niel E, Wautier JL, Hung PP, Dervichian M, Cattan D, et al. Colchicine Disposition in Human Leukocytes After Single and Multiple Oral Administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1993) 54(4):360–7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1993.161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Wu M, Tian Y, Wang Q, Guo C. Gout: A Disease Involved With Complicated Immunoinflammatory Responses: A Narrative Review. Clin Rheumatol (2020) 39(10):2849–59. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05090-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Martinon F, Petrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-Associated Uric Acid Crystals Activate the NALP3 Inflammasome. Nature (2006) 440(7081):237–41. doi: 10.1038/nature04516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Schiller M, Ben-Shaanan TL, Rolls A. Neuronal Regulation of Immunity: Why, How and Where? Nat Rev Immunol (2021) 21(1):20–36. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0387-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Korkmaz C, Cansu DU, Cansu GB. Familial Mediterranean Fever: The Molecular Pathways From Stress Exposure to Attacks. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2020) 59(12):3611–21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa450

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Hindelang-Gertner C, Stoeckel ME, Porte A, Stutinsky F. Colchicine Effects on Neurosecretory Neurons and Other Hypothalamic and Hypophysial Cells, With Special Reference to Changes in the Cytoplasmic Membranes. Cell Tissue Res (1976) 170(1):17–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00220108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: familial Mediterranean fever, stress, catecholamines, microtubule system, axonal transport, norepinephrine, epinephrine

Citation: Korkmaz C, Cansu DÜ and Cansu GB (2022) A Hypothesis Regarding Neurosecretory Inhibition of Stress Mediators by Colchicine in Preventing Stress-Induced Familial Mediterranean Fever Attacks. Front. Immunol. 13:834769. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.834769

Received: 13 December 2021; Accepted: 31 January 2022;
Published: 17 February 2022.

Edited by:

Ozgur Kasapcopur, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Turkey

Reviewed by:

Abdurrahman Tufan, Gazi University, Turkey
Hakan Babaoglu, Gazi University, Turkey

Copyright © 2022 Korkmaz, Cansu and Cansu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cengiz Korkmaz, Y2tvcmttYXpAb2d1LmVkdS50cg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.