Single-Domain Antibodies Efficiently Neutralize SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern

Virus-neutralizing antibodies are one of the few treatment options for COVID-19. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to the emergence of virus variants with reduced sensitivity to some antibody-based therapies. The development of potent antibodies with a broad spectrum of neutralizing activity is urgently needed. Here we isolated a panel of single-domain antibodies that specifically bind to the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein. Three of the selected antibodies exhibiting most robust neutralization potency were used to generate dimeric molecules. We observed that these modifications resulted in up to a 200-fold increase in neutralizing activity. The most potent heterodimeric molecule efficiently neutralized each of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants. This heterodimeric molecule could be a promising drug candidate for a treatment for COVID-19 caused by virus variants of concern.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in over 340 million of infections and over 5 million deaths worldwide (January 2022, WHO). These numbers are still rising and COVID-19 disease remains a great challenge to public health system. The development of safe and effective treatment together with vaccination is a highly important goal for scientists and health care professionals over the world.

One of the approaches to the development of an effective therapeutic agent is the isolation of monoclonal antibodies that efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 virus. Currently, several monoclonal antibodies already received emergency use authorization for COVID-19 treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis. These antibodies are bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, casirivimab plus imdevimab, sotrovimab and regdanvimab (1–4).

Along with conventional antibodies, camelid single-domain antibodies (also called nanobodies or VHHs) are promising candidates for the development of antibody-based therapies (5, 6). Camelids have unique heavy-chain antibodies that are devoid of light chains (7). Nanobodies are the minimal antigen-binding domains of these heavy-chain antibodies. They have several advantages, including the ability to recognize epitopes that are not accessible to conventional antibodies, increased stability of nanobodies, simplicity of generation of multivalent forms and low cost bacterial production (8). Currently, several nanobodies to SARS-COV-2 have been isolated showing neutralizing activity in in vitro and in vivo studies, which confirms their promising potential as therapeutic agents (9–15).

The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in emergence of virus variants that have become more transmissible and less sensitive to neutralizing antibodies. The spread of these new virus variants has reduced the efficacy of vaccines and some therapeutic antibodies. The list of these variants of concern (VOCs) consist of B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), B.1.1.28/P.1 (Gamma), B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants (January 2022, WHO). The reduction of neutralization by antibodies is caused by mutations in S glycoprotein, including K417N/T, L452R, T478K, E484K and N501Y substitutions (16, 17). Recently appeared Omicron variant has more than 30 mutations in S glycoprotein that provide considerable escape from neutralization by antibodies (18, 19). In this regard, it became necessary to isolate antibodies, the neutralizing activity of which will not be affected due to observed mutations, therefore, these antibodies or their cocktails will retain activity against each of VOCs.

Here we identified and characterized a panel of single-domain antibodies isolated from immune VHH library that specifically bind RBD of S glycoprotein. We assessed the neutralizing activity of the isolated antibodies in a microneutralization assay with live SARS-CoV-2 and selected three most potent antibodies. To increase the therapeutic potential, these clones were modified to homodimeric and heterodimeric forms, and the neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs was investigated. The most potent heterodimeric form, P2C5-P5F8, exhibited activity against all tested virus variants at low concentration. These results indicate that P2C5-P5F8 heterodimer is a promising candidate for further research to develop COVID-19 antibody-based therapy.

Results

To identify SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing single-domain antibodies we immunized one Bactrian camel with SARS-CoV-2 RBD. The recombinant RBD protein was previously produced in CHO-S cells and purified. Immunization was performed using five sequential injections (Figure 1A). Blood was collected 5 days after final immunization and the serum RBD-specific antibodies titer was detected by ELISA. Post-immunization serum demonstrated potent binding to SARS-CoV-2 RBD with titer more than 1/200 000 (Figure 1B). The neutralizing activity of antibodies in the immunized serum was measured by the microneutralization assay using live SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.1, the neutralizing antibodies titer was 1/1280.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Isolation of RBD-specific nanobodies. (A) Immunization schedule. Bactrian camel was immunized with 100 μg RBD subcutaneously (with complete Freund`s adjuvant), followed by four consecutive immunization with 100 μg RBD subcutaneously (with incomplete Freund`s adjuvant). Blood samples were collected before immunization and five days after the last immunization. (B) RBD-specific antibodies in camel serum before and after immunization, detected by ELISA. The assay reveals a strong positive RBD-specific serological activity 5 days after the last immunization. (C) ELISA-based RBD-binders screening. A total of 212 individual clones with a strong positive ELISA signal were selected for sequencing. (D) Phylogenetic tree showing sequence diversity of 39 unique VHH clones from this study and four previously described single-domain antibodies of C. bactrianus (20), blue squares –previously described single-domain antibodies of C. bactrianus, green squares – the clones selected for further analysis.

To isolate monoclonal RBD-specific nanobodies, we constructed a VHH phage display library by cloning VHH sequences from B cells of immunized camel into a phagmid vector. We performed one round of phage display followed by ELISA-based screening of individual clones to identify RBD-specific binders.

We used monoclonal phage-ELISA together with monoclonal ELISA to identify RBD binders with high expression levels and high solubility. A total of 212 clones showing positive phage-ELISA and ELISA signals were selected for sequencing (Figure 1C), which lead to the identification of 39 unique clones of nanobodies. After sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis we selected 16 antibodies with highly diverse sequences for further research (Figure 1D). These nanobodies were expressed and purified, and the RBD binding activity of each antibody was analyzed by ELISA. We confirmed the binding of 14 clones with ELISA EC50 values ranged from 1.1 to 313.3 nM (Figure 2A). Most of the antibodies (13 out of 14) displayed strong positive signals with EC50 below 22 nM.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Characterization of the selected nanobodies. (A) RBD-binding activity of nanobodies by ELISA and neutralization activity of nanobodies by microneutralization assay using live SARS-CoV-2 virus. The minimal neutralizing concentration was defined as the lowest antibody concentration (highest antibody dilution) that completely inhibited the cytopathic effect of the virus in two or three from the three replicable wells. (B) Kinetic parameters of nanobodies interaction with RBD by SPR. Association (k_on), dissociation (k_off), maximal analyte binding capacity (R_max), equilibrium association constants (K_A), equilibrium dissociation constants (K_D) and Chi² for VHHs binding to RBD. (C) SPR-based epitope binning experiments, in-tandem format. The first saturating antibody indicated on the top row, the second competing antibody indicated on the left column. (D) Blocking of ACE2-RBD interaction measured by competitive ELISA.

To examine the capacity of selected RBD binders to neutralize live SARS-CoV-2 virus we performed a microneutralization assay with inhibition of the cytopathic effect of virus as a marker of neutralization. We found that 10 of 14 nanobodies efficiently neutralized SARS-CoV-2 virus (B.1.1.1) at concentrations ranging from 12 nM to 1540 nM (Figure 2A). The three most potent antibodies were P2C5, P2G1 and P5F8, which completely inhibited the cytopathic effect of the virus at 24 nM, 12 nM and 48 nM, respectively.

We investigated the binding kinetics of P2C5, P2G1 and P5F8 neutralizing nanobodies via surface plasmon resonance (SPR). All antibodies tested bound RBD with high affinity, dissociation constants (K_D) were 3.97 nM, 5.36 nM and 1.94 nM for P2C5, P2G1 and P5F8, respectively (Figure 2B).

To explore whether the isolated antibodies bound to distinct epitopes we performed epitope binning immunoassay using SPR. Two groups of nanobodies were identified; antibodies from the first group have overlapping or competing epitopes with P2C5, and antibodies from the second group with P2G1 (Figure 2C). We also revealed that P2C5 competes with class I anti-RBD antibody casirivimab and P2G1 competes with class III antibody imdevimab.

Since the capacity of an antibody to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 virus is frequently associated with blocking the interaction between S glycoprotein and ACE2 receptor, we analyzed the ability of isolated nanobodies to block the RBD binding to ACE2 by competitive ELISA (Figure 2D). We revealed a decrease in ELISA signal for most of neutralizing nanobodies indicating antibodies competition with ACE2 for RBD binding. We observed that one of the most potent neutralizing antibodies, P2C5, blocked the ACE2-RBD interaction with an inhibition rate greater than 90% at 0.5 μg/ml.

In order to improve the antiviral property of antibodies we produced homodimer and heterodimer forms of P2C5, P2G1 and P5F8 clones. Monomers were fused using a flexible GS-linker (Gly4Ser)₄ for dimerization. The binding of generated dimeric molecules to the recombinant RBD protein was confirmed by ELISA. Analysis of the neutralization capacity in the microneutralization assay revealed a pronounced improvement in the neutralizing activity of several dimeric forms (Table 1). Notable, P2C5 homodimer inhibited cytopathic effect of the virus at 89 pM, thus the homodimer activity increased more than 200-fold compared to the monomer activity. We also observed that P2C5-P5F8 heterodimer form was up to 100 times more active than the monomeric forms, this molecule exhibited neutralization activity at 178 pM.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Neutralizing activity of the most potent monomers of nanobodies, homodimeric and heterodimeric forms of nanobodies in a microneutralization assay against live SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

With the emergence and spread of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 with increased transmissibility and reduced neutralization by antibodies it became necessary to isolate antibodies with a broad spectrum of neutralizing activity. We assessed the neutralizing activity of isolated antibodies against variants of concern (VOCs), including B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), B.1.1.28/P.1 (Gamma), B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants (Table 1). P2C5 monomer neutralized B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1 and B.1.1.529 but was unable to neutralize B.1.617.2. P5F8 and P2G1 monomeric forms remained active against all tested VOCs (inhibited CPE at 12-96 nM) except Omicron variant. P5F8 monomer showed a 2-fold decrease in activity against B.1.351 and B.1.1.28/P.1. P2G1 showed a 2-4-fold decrease against VOCs. The most potent heterodimeric molecule P2C5-P5F8 exhibited activity against all VOCs neutralizing B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.1.529 variants at 89 pM, 356 pM, 356 pM, 2.85 nM and 709 pM, respectively. The most active P2C5 homodimer neutralized each of VOC except B.1.617.2 at a concentration 356 pM and lower, depending on the virus variant. Overall, P2C5-P5F8 heterodimer showed neutralizing activity against each of the tested VOCs and was a promising candidate for further investigations as a potential therapeutic agent.

Discussion

The SARS-CoV-2 virus gave rise to ongoing pandemic, which continues to claim lives and poses a threat to public health. Along with vaccination to prevent COVID-19, therapeutic antiviral agents are urgently needed to treat the infection.

One of the promising approaches for the viral infection treatment is an antibody-based therapy. Antibodies administration approved for immunoprophylaxis and treatment of viral infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus and ebolavirus (21, 22). Today, several monoclonal antibodies are already in use for COVID-19 treatment (bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, casirivimab plus imdevimab and sotrovimab). It was shown that the administration of these antibodies to nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and risk factors for disease progression reduced the risk of hospitalization and death (1–4).

In addition to conventional antibodies, single-domain antibodies or nanobodies from camelid heavy-chain antibodies are being actively investigated as a potential therapeutic agent with a number of advantages. The small size and single-domain nature of nanobodies allow them to bind epitopes that are not available for conventional antibodies, in particular concave epitopes such as grooves and clefts (23–25). Nanobodies show strong binding affinities and also are highly stable across wide range of temperatures and pH (26). The production of nanobodies in bacteria is less expensive than classical antibody production. All this allows the use of single-domain antibodies for many of applications, including research, diagnostics and therapy (6, 8).

The main mechanism of virus-neutralizing activity of antibodies is associated with the prevention of viral entry into host cells. The entry of SARS-CoV-2 virus occurs after the interaction of S glycoprotein with cell receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Therefore, S glycoprotein, in particular its receptor-binding domain (RBD), is an attractive target for the development of neutralizing antibodies.

In our work, we immunized a Bactrian camel with the recombinant RBD protein for following isolation of effective neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus. We generated a VHH phage display library and selected a panel of RBD-specific nanobodies. Using an in vitro microneutralization assay we identified three clones (P2C5, P5F8 and P2G1) of the most potent antibodies that completely inhibited the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 virus at minimal concentrations from 12 nM to 48 nM.

At the next stage, to enhance the neutralization potential of isolated nanobodies we generated homodimeric and heterodimeric forms of the most active antibodies. It was previously shown that multivalent forms of nanobodies are characterized by increased functionality by improving antigen-binding through avidity effect (27). For example, the dimeric form of anti-TNF VHH was up to 500 times more active than the monovalent form in rheumatoid arthritis model in vivo (28), homotrimeric molecule of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nanobody Nb21₃ were 30-fold more potent in pseudovirus neutralization (14), dimeric forms of nanobodies to botulinum neurotoxin showed a higher protective activity in vivo (29). In our study, we revealed a 200-fold improvement of neutralization potential after dimerization of P2C5 nanobody. The bivalent molecule effectively neutralized SARS-CoV-2 virus at 89 pM. We also observed a pronounced increase in neutralizing activity in the case of P2C5-P5F8 heterodimeric form, which inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus at 178 pM. In the case of the bivalent form of P5F8 we observed only a slight increase in activity. We assume that this may be due to the monovalent binding of P5F8 dimer to the S glycoprotein, for example as a result of the insufficient linker length to span the distance between epitopes in the trimeric S glycoprotein.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with mutations in their RBD epitopes leads to the viral escape from neutralizing antibodies. It was shown that the virus-neutralization activity of sera samples obtained from individuals vaccinated with Pfizer/BNT162b2, Moderna/mRNA-1273 or Sputnik V decreased in the case of the B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1 and B.1.617.2 variants compared to wild-type virus (30–33). The most pronounced decrease of the virus-neutralization activity of sera observed in case of the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant (34–36). Escape mutations are also a challenge for antibody-based therapy development. Some therapeutic antibodies have become ineffective against VOCs, for example, the activity of bamlanivimab against Delta is reduced, the activity of etesevimab and casivimab against Beta variant is reduced (37). The activity of most neutralizing antibodies is escaped by the Omicron variant. Several monoclonal antibodies completely lost inhibitory activity against Omicron, including bamlanivimab, etesevimab, casirivimab, imdevimab and regdanvimab (18, 38). The activity of some previously isolated nanobodies also altered by escape mutations. The Beta strain drastically reduced the efficacy of the high-affinity nanobodies Nb20 and Nb21 (39). Thereby, it is urgently needed to identify nanobodies or their combinations that retain activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

We investigated the activity of isolated potent nanobodies and their dimeric forms using a microneutralization assay against live SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. We found that P2C5-P5F8 heterodimer effectively neutralized all tested virus variants at low concentration, including Delta and Omicron VOCs. In particular it was observed that this dimeric molecule completely inhibited the cytopathic effect of the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants at concentrations 89 pM, 356 pM, 356 pM, 2.85 nM and 709 pM, respectively.

For the improvement of antiviral efficacy of obtained P2C5-P5F8 molecule further modifications may include the fusion of the heterodimer to human IgG1 Fc domain. Fc modifications are often used to increase serum half-life of nanobodies, as well as to involve Fc-mediated effector functions (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, etc.) (29, 40).

Overall, we produced heterodimeric form of nanobodies that possess a broad spectrum of activity, overcoming escape mutations in VOCs. This heterodimeric molecule is a promising candidate for the further development of an effective antiviral agent for COVID-19 treatment especially for patients with risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Cell Lines and Viruses

CHO-S cells were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA), cat. no. R80007. Vero E6 cells (ATCC CRL 1586) was obtained from Russian collection of vertebrate cell lines.

SARS-CoV-2 strains B.1.1.1 (hCoV-19/Russia/Moscow_PMVL-1/2020), B.1.351 (hCoV-19/Russia/SPE-RII-27029S/2021), B.1.617.2 (hCoV-19/Russia/SPE-RII-32758S/2021) and B.1.1.529 (hCoV-19/Russia/MOW-Moscow_PMVL-O16/2021) were isolated from nasopharyngeal swabs.

SARS-CoV-2 strains B.1.1.7 (hCoV-19/Netherlands/NoordHolland_20432/2020) and B.1.1.28/P.1 (hCoV-19/Netherlands/NoordHolland_10915/2021) were obtained from European Virus Archive Global.

Cloning, Expression and Purification of Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD Protein

The RBD nucleotide sequence of SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 isolate (Genbank accession number MN908947, from 319 to 545 aa) was synthesized (Evrogen, Russia) and cloned into the pCEP4 mammalian expression vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The signal peptide of alkaline phosphatase SEAP was inserted before RBD coding sequence, the His tag was fused to the end of the sequence. The obtained recombinant vector was transfected into CHO-S cells using CHOgro High Yield Expression System (Mirus Bio, USA). The culture supernatant containing the RBD protein was harvested after 10 days, the recombinant RBD protein was purified by IMAC using an AKTA start system (Cytiva, USA) and a HisTrap column (Cytiva, USA). The protein expression and purity was confirmed with SDS-PAGE.

Bactrian Camel Immunization

Bactrian camel was immunized with recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein at a dose of 100 μg with complete Freund`s adjuvant subcutaneously followed by four booster immunizations with 100 μg RBD with incomplete Freund`s adjuvant. The interval between the first and second injections was 14 days; the intervals between all subsequent injections were 10 days. Before immunization, a small blood sample (5 ml) was collected as a control. 50 ml blood was collected 5 days after the last immunization and was used for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolation and VHH phage display library construction.

Phage Display Library Construction

The library construction was performed as described earlier (29). Briefly, total RNA was isolated from PBMCs and then reverse transcribed to cDNA. VHHs coding sequences were PCR amplified and cloned into a pHEN1 phagmid vector (41). Recombinant phagmids were electroporated into TG1 cells (Lucigen, USA). A VHH library of 7.3 x 10⁶ individual clones was obtained. 98% of the clones harbored the vector with the right insert size.

Phage Preparation and Biopanning

Phage preparation was performed according to the previous description (29). To select RBD-specific nanobodies one round of biopanning was performed. 5 μg of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein were immobilized in the well of microtiter plate. After rinsing three times with PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (TPBS), the well was blocked with blocking buffer (5% non-fat dried milk in TPBS) at 37°C for 1 h. A total of ~10¹¹ phage particles in blocking buffer were added to the well and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Unbound phages were removed by washing with TPBS. The bound phages were eluted by trypsin (1 mg/ml). The eluted phage particles were used for infection of TG1 cells.

ELISA

Screening for RBD-specific binders was performed using monoclonal phage ELISA and monoclonal ELISA. For monoclonal phage ELISA, individual clones were inoculated in 1 ml of 2xYT (Sigma, USA) containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin in 96-deep-well plates. Bacterial cells were infected with KM13 helper phage and incubated overnight at 30°C. The plates were centrifuged, 50 μl of the supernatant were used for phage ELISA. For monoclonal ELISA, individual clones were cultured in 96-deep-well plates at 30°C overnight. The next day, the cells were lysed by the freeze-thaw method, and then the plates were centrifuged. 50 μl of the supernatant were used for monoclonal ELISA. Immunoplates (Nunc MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were coated with recombinant RBD protein (100 ng per well) at 4°C overnight. The plates were rinsed three times with TPBS and the wells were blocked with blocking buffer at 37°C for 1 h. 50 μl of bacterial supernatants containing monoclonal recombinant phages (monoclonal phage ELISA) or monoclonal nanobodies (monoclonal ELISA) were added to the wells. After 1 h incubation at 37°C, the wells were rinsed five times with TPBS. Bound phages were detected by HRP-conjugated anti-M13 antibody (Sino Biological, China), bound VHH were detected by HRP-conjugated anti-Myc-tag antibody (Abcam, UK) followed by the addition of 3,3`5,5`-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Bio-Rad, USA) as a substrate. The reaction was stopped by 1M H₂SO₄, the absorbance at 450 nm was read using a Varioskan LUX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

To confirm RBD-specific binding of the selected nanobodies immunoplates (Nunc MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were coated with RBD (100 ng per well). Serial two-fold dilutions of antibodies were made, starting from 10 μg/ml to 0.6 ng/ml. 100 μl of each concentration was added to the wells. Bound VHHs were detected by HRP-conjugated anti-Myc-tag antibody and TMB substrate. EC50 values were calculated using four-parameter logistic regression using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA).

For competitive ELISA recombinant hACE2 protein were immobilized (400 ng per well) on immunoplates (Nunc MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). RBD-specific nanobodies were mixed with HRP-conjugated recombinant RBD protein (0.2 μg/ml) to two final concentrations of antibodies (0.5 μg/ml and 0.1 μg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Nanobody to C. difficile Toxin B was used as a negative control. After incubation samples (100 μl) were transferred to hACE2 coated plates and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The TMB solution was added for 15 min, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 1M H₂SO₄. The inhibition rate of ACE2-RBD binding was calculated by comparing the signals in the sample and the negative control wells.

Expression and Purification of Nanobodies

Phagmids encoding the sequences of the selected nanobodies were transformed into BL21 cells (NEB, USA) for expression and purification. The cells were cultured in 100 ml 2xYT (containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin) overnight at 30°CC. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed by a BugBuster Protein Extraction Reagent (Novagen, USA). Nanobodies were purified by IMAC using an AKTA start system and a HisTrap column, dialyzed against PBS and sterile filtered. Protein expression and purity was confirmed with SDS-PAGE.

Microneutralization Assay With Live SARS-CoV-2

Nanobodies were two-fold serially diluted starting from 20 μg/ml to 1.2 ng/ml in complete Dulbecco`s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI-FBS). Triplicates of each dilution were mixed with 100 TCID50 (median tissue culture infectious doses) of SARS-CoV-2 and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After incubation samples were added to a monolayer of Vero E6 cells and incubated in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C for 96-120 h. The cytopathic effect (CPE) of the virus was assessed visually. The minimal neutralizing concentration was defined as the lowest antibody concentration (highest antibody dilution) that completely inhibited CPE of the virus in two or three of the three replicable wells.

The following SARS-CoV-2 strains were used in the assay: B.1.1.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.1.529.

All experiments were performed in a Biosafety Level 3 facility (BSL-3).

Binding Kinetics Measurements and Epitope Binning Assay

The affinity of nanobodies was measured by surface plasmon resonance (Biacore 3000, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Sweden). Recombinant RBD protein at a concentration 20 μg/ml in 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 4.5) was immobilized on the surface of a CM5 sensor chip using a Amine Coupling Kit (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Sweden). VHHs were serial 4-fold diluted from 417 nM to 0 nM and flowed over the captured RBD surface at 15 μl/min for 3 minutes. Dissociation time was 10 minutes. Working buffer was HBS-EP (0.01 M HEPES pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.005% v/v Surfactant P20). After each injection, the chip surface was regenerated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 1.5 for 40 s at a flow rate 30 μl/min. Calculations were performed using the BIAEvaluation software (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Sweden).

For epitope binning recombinant RBD protein was immobilized on CM5 sensor chip as described above. The first antibody (10 μg/ml in working buffer) was flowed over the captured RBD surface at 15 μl/min for 2 minutes to achieve saturation. Then the injection of second antibody at the same concentration and conditions was performed. After each experiment, the chip surface was regenerated.

Generation of Homodimeric and Heterodimeric Forms of Nanobodies

Homodimeric and heterodimeric forms of nanobodies were generated using two rounds of PCR followed by cloning PCR products into a pHEN1 vector. VHHs in dimeric forms were fused by GS-linker (Gly4Ser)₄. In the first round of PCR, VHH monomers were amplified using Q5 High-fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, UK) and the primers listed in Table 2. In the second round PCR nanobodies sequences were assembled together and amplified using pHEN1-F and pHEN1-R primers. PCR products and the pHEN1 vector were digested with SfiI and NotI restriction enzymes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and ligated using T4 ligase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Recombinant vectors were used for TG1 cells transformation.

TABLE 2

Table 2 Primers used for generation of dimeric molecules.

DNA Isolation and Sequencing

Phagemid DNA was isolated from bacterial cells using the Plasmid miniprep kit (Evrogen, Russia). VHH-coding sequences were sequenced with Lac-prom (5’-CTTTATGCTTCCGGCTCGTATG-3’) and pIII-R (5` CTTTCCAGACGTTAGTAAATG 3`) primers according to the protocol of the BigDyeTerminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit for the Genetic Analyzer 3500 Applied Biosystems (Waltham, MA, USA). The electrophoretic DNA separation was performed in 50-cm capillaries with POP7 polymer. MEGA X was used for the generation of the single consensus sequences by assembling of the forward and reverse sequences (42).

Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

A phylogenetic tree of isolated VHHs was constructed to display the sequence diversity of single-domain antibodies. The analysis comprised the following traditional steps: alignment, phylogeny and tree rendering. Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE (v3.8.31) (43). The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the PhyML program (v3.1/3.0 aLRT) (44). The WAG substitution model was selected assuming an estimated proportion of invariant sites (of 0.000) and 4 gamma-distributed rate categories to account for rate heterogeneity across sites. The gamma shape parameter was estimated directly from the data (gamma=0.448). Reliability for internal branch was assessed using the aLRT test (SH-Like) (45). Graphical representation and edition of the phylogenetic tree were performed with MEGA X (42).

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: This article utilizes proprietary sequencing data. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov, sdmitryv@yahoo.com.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Bioethics Committee of FSBI National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology named after the honorary academician N. F. Gamaleya of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Author Contributions

Conception and design of the experiments: IF, DS, IE, and ID. Library construction, phage display, cloning, production, purification and characterization of VHH and their dimeric forms: IF, IA, AIK, IE, ER, AD, and OZ. Production and purification of recombinant proteins: IE, ER, AD. SARS-CoV-2 culture and microneutralization assay: ID, AVK, AI, and AB. SRP kinetic measurements: DV. Camel immunization and blood collection: DE. DNA sequencing, phylogenetic tree construction: OV, NR, EA, and MK. Data analysis and interpretation, figures preparation: IF and DS. Drafting the manuscript: IF. Revision the manuscript: DS, IE, ID, and OV. Approval of the final version for submission: DS, DL, BN, and AG. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work received funding from Sberbank Charitable Foundation “Investment to the Future”, donation agreement no. BM-03/2020.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Y.S. Lebedin who kindly provided us with the recombinant hACE2 protein and the HRP conjugated recombinant RBD protein.

References

1. Dougan M, Nirula A, Azizad M, Mocherla B, Gottlieb RL, Chen P, et al. Bamlanivimab Plus Etesevimab in Mild or Moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med (2021) 385:1382–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gupta A, Gonzalez-Rojas Y, Juarez E, Crespo Casal M, Moya J, Falci DR, et al. Early Treatment for Covid-19 With SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab. N Engl J Med (2021). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107934

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, et al. REGEN-COV Antibody Combination and Outcomes in Outpatients With Covid-19. N Engl J Med (2021). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108163

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lee JY, Lee JY, Ko JH, Hyun M, Kim HA, Cho S, et al. Effectiveness of Regdanvimab Treatment in High-Risk COVID-19 Patients to Prevent Progression to Severe Disease. Front Immunol (2021). doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.772320

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bessalah S, Jebahi S, Mejri N, Salhi I, Khorchani T, Hammadi M. Perspective on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Potential of Camel Nanobodies for Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19). 3 Biotech (2021) 11:89. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02647-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Jovčevska I, Muyldermans S. The Therapeutic Potential of Nanobodies. BioDrugs (2020) 34:11–26. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00392-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Muyldermans S. Single Domain Camel Antibodies: Current Status. J Biotechnol (2001) 74:277–302. doi: 10.1016/s1389-0352(01)00021-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Muyldermans S. Nanobodies: Natural Single-Domain Antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem (2013) 82:775–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Dong J, Huang B, Wang B, Titong A, Gallolu Kankanamalage S, Jia Z, et al. Development of Humanized Tri-Specific Nanobodies With Potent Neutralization for SARS-CoV-2. Sci Rep (2020) 10:17806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74761-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Huo J, Mikolajek H, Le Bas A, Clark JJ, Sharma P, Kipar A, et al. A Potent SARS-CoV-2 Neutralising Nanobody Shows Therapeutic Efficacy in the Syrian Golden Hamster Model of COVID-19. Nat Commun (2021) 12:5469. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25480-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lu Q, Zhang Z, Li H, Zhong K, Zhao Q, Wang Z, et al. Development of Multivalent Nanobodies Blocking SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Targeting RBD of Spike Protein. J Nanobiotechnol (2021) 19:33. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00768-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Pymm P, Adair A, Chan L-J, Cooney JP, Mordant FL, Allison CC, et al. Nanobody Cocktails Potently Neutralize SARS-CoV-2 D614G N501Y Variant and Protect Mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2021) 118(19):e2101918118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101918118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Schoof M, Faust B, Saunders RA, Sangwan S, Rezelj V, Hoppe N, et al. An Ultrapotent Synthetic Nanobody Neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by Stabilizing Inactive Spike. Science (2020) 370:1473–9. doi: 10.1126/science.abe3255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Xiang Y, Nambulli S, Xiao Z, Liu H, Sang Z, Duprex WP, et al. Versatile and Multivalent Nanobodies Efficiently Neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Science (2020) 370:1479–84. doi: 10.1126/science.abe4747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xu J, Xu K, Jung S, Conte A, Lieberman J, Muecksch F, et al. Multimeric Nanobodies From Camelid Engineered Mice and Llamas Potently Neutralize SARS-CoV-2 Variants. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.03.04.433768

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Harvey WT, Carabelli AM, Jackson B, Gupta RK, Thomson EC, Harrison EM, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Spike Mutations and Immune Escape. Nat Rev Microbiol (2021) 19:409–24. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hastie KM, Li H, Bedinger D, Schendel SL, Dennison SM, Li K, et al. Defining Variant-Resistant Epitopes Targeted by SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Global Consortium Study. Science (2021) 374:472–8. doi: 10.1126/science.abh2315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Planas D, Saunders N, Maes P, Guivel-Benhassine F, Planchais C, Buchrieser J, et al. Considerable Escape of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Omicron to Antibody Neutralization. Biorxiv: Preprint Server Biol (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.14.472630

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Cao Y, Wang J, Jian F, Xiao T, Song W, Yisimayi A, et al. B.1.1.529 Escapes the Majority of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies of Diverse Epitopes. Biorxiv: Preprint Server Biol (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.07.470392

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Tillib SV, Vyatchanin AS, Muyldermans S. Molecular Analysis of Heavy Chain-Only Antibodies of Camelus Bactrianus. Biochem (Mosc) (2014) 79:1382–90. doi: 10.1134/S000629791412013X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Markham A. REGN-EB3: First Approval. Drugs (2021) 81:175–8. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01452-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rocca A, Biagi C, Scarpini S, Dondi A, Vandini S, Pierantoni L, et al. Passive Immunoprophylaxis Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Children: Where Are We Now? Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22:3703. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. de Genst E, Silence K, Decanniere K, Conrath K, Loris R, Kinne J, et al. Molecular Basis for the Preferential Cleft Recognition by Dromedary Heavy-Chain Antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2006) 103:4586–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505379103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Muyldermans S. Applications of Nanobodies. Annu Rev Anim Biosci (2021) 9:401–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zavrtanik U, Lukan J, Loris R, Lah J, Hadži S. Structural Basis of Epitope Recognition by Heavy-Chain Camelid Antibodies. J Mol Biol (2018) 430:4369–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. van der Linden RH, Frenken LG, de Geus B, Harmsen MM, Ruuls RC, Stok W, et al. Comparison of Physical Chemical Properties of Llama VHH Antibody Fragments and Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies. Biochim Biophys Acta (1999) 1431:37–46. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(99)00030-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Saerens D, Ghassabeh GH, Muyldermans S. Single-Domain Antibodies as Building Blocks for Novel Therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol (2008) 8:600–8. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Coppieters K, Dreier T, Silence K, de Haard H, Lauwereys M, Casteels P, et al. Formatted Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha VHH Proteins Derived From Camelids Show Superior Potency and Targeting to Inflamed Joints in a Murine Model of Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2006) 54:1856–66. doi: 10.1002/art.21827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Godakova SA, Noskov AN, Vinogradova ID, Ugriumova GA, Solovyev AI, Esmagambetov IB, et al. Camelid VHHs Fused to Human Fc Fragments Provide Long Term Protection Against Botulinum Neurotoxin A in Mice. Toxins (Basel) (2019) 11. doi: 10.3390/toxins11080464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Choi A, Koch M, Wu K, Dixon G, Oestreicher J, Legault H, et al. Serum Neutralizing Activity of mRNA-1273 Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants. J Virol (2021) 95:e0131321. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01313-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Gushchin VA, Dolzhikova IV, Shchetinin AM, Odintsova AS, Siniavin AE, Nikiforova MA, et al. Neutralizing Activity of Sera From Sputnik V-Vaccinated People Against Variants of Concern (VOC: B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3) and Moscow Endemic SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Vaccines (Basel) (2021) 9. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hoffmann M, Arora P, Groß R, Seidel A, Hörnich BF, Hahn AS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.351 and P.1 Escape From Neutralizing Antibodies. Cell (2021) 184:2384–93.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hoffmann M, Hofmann-Winkler H, Krüger N, Kempf A, Nehlmeier I, Graichen L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variant B.1.617 Is Resistant to Bamlanivimab and Evades Antibodies Induced by Infection and Vaccination. Cell Rep (2021) 36:109415. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Dolzhikova IV, Iliukhina AA, Kovyrshina AV, Kuzina AV, Gushchin VA, Siniavin AE, et al. Sputnik Light Booster After Sputnik V Vaccination Induces Robust Neutralizing Antibody Response to B.1.1.529 (Omicron) SARS-CoV-2 Variant. MedRxiv: Preprint Server Health Sci (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.17.21267976

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Rossler A, Riepler L, Bante D, von Laer D, Kimpel J. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Variant (Omicron) Evades Neutralization by Sera From Vaccinated and Convalescent Individuals. MedRxiv: Preprint Server Health Sci (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.08.21267491

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Doria-Rose NA, Shen X, Schmidt SD, O`Dell S, McDanal C, Feng W, et al. Booster of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Escape From Neutralizing Antibodies. MedRxiv: Preprint Server Health Sci (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.15.21267805

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Planas D, Veyer D, Baidaliuk A, Staropoli I, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rajah MM, et al. Reduced Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Delta to Antibody Neutralization. Nature (2021) 596:276–80. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03777-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. VanBlargan LA, Errico JM, Halfmann PJ, Zost SJ, Crowe JE Jr, Purcell LA, et al. An Infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron Virus Escapes Neutralization by Several Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies. Biorxiv: Preprint Server Biol (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.15.472828

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Sun D, Sang Z, Kim YJ, Xiang Y, Cohen T, Belford AK, et al. Potent Neutralizing Nanobodies Resist Convergent Circulating Variants of SARS-CoV-2 by Targeting Diverse and Conserved Epitopes. Nat Commun (2021) 12:4676. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24963-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Günaydın G, Yu S, Gräslund T, Hammarström L, Marcotte H. Fusion of the Mouse IgG1 Fc Domain to the VHH Fragment (ARP1) Enhances Protection in a Mouse Model of Rotavirus. Sci Rep (2016) 6:30171. doi: 10.1038/srep30171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Hoogenboom HR, Griffiths AD, Johnson KS, Chiswell DJ, Hudson P, Winter G. Multi-Subunit Proteins on the Surface of Filamentous Phage: Methodologies for Displaying Antibody (Fab) Heavy and Light Chains. Nucleic Acids Res (1991) 19:4133–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.15.4133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol (2018) 35:1547–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment With High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Res (2004) 32:1792–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood. Syst Biol (2003) 52:696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Anisimova M, Gascuel O. Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative. Syst Biol (2006) 55:539–52. doi: 10.1080/10635150600755453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar