The potential role of cfDNA-related innate immune responses in postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting

The purpose of treating alveolar bone cleft is to restore a normal maxilla structure. Multiple factors have been identified that can affect the success of alveolar bone grafting. However, with consistent treatment modifications, the surgical outcomes have been improved, but alveolar bone loss still exists. Thus, a new aspect should be found to solve this problem. As alveolar bone belongs to the periodontal tissues, the mechanism of the alveolar bone loss after bone grafting in patients with alveolar bone cleft may be similar to the development of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been demonstrated as a key promoter of alveolar bone loss during periodontal inflammation. We hypothesized that cfDNA-related innate immune responses could be a major inducement for postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting. In this perspective, we preliminarily proved the potential association between cfDNA, TLR9 pathway, and alveolar bone grafting operation, and it might verify that surgical trauma could accumulate cfDNA, which can further activate cellular TLR9 signaling.

Introduction

Patients with alveolar bone cleft need alveolar bone grafting to restore a normal maxilla structure, and the grafting of autogenous bone like iliac bone is still the most common choice (1, 2). However, bone loss after the surgery happens a lot (3). Clinical studies demonstrated that the operation age (1, 4), the structure of the alveolar cleft (5–7), and the pre- and post-operative maneuvers, especially poor management of oral hygiene (3), can affect the final outcomes of bone grafting. With consistent modifications of the treatment, the surgical outcomes have been improved, but the alveolar bone loss still exists (8, 9).

As alveolar bone belongs to the periodontal tissues, we hypothesize that the mechanism of the alveolar bone loss after bone grafting surgery might be similar to the development of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis. In periodontitis, tartar (mineralized plaque, soft scale, and food residue around the gingival sulcus) is the pathogenic factor that initiates the periodontal innate immune response and leads to inflammatory alveolar bone loss (10). For tartar, oral hygiene helps remove plaque and keep the tartar away (11), which will inhibit the innate immune response and stop the progress of inflammatory bone loss (12). Periodontal inflammation and related tissue destruction are more severer in patients with alveolar bone cleft than in those without alveolar bone cleft (13, 14), and the structure of alveolar defect can affect oral hygiene, then adversely exacerbate the periodontal status (15). Therefore, the local environment of the cleft is risky for enhancing bone loss. Oral hygiene, which can eliminate the local stimulus for periodontal inflammation, helps avoid bone grafting failure (16), which preliminarily supports our hypothesis that inhibition of local inflammation and innate immune responses could benefit bone grafting treatment.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-related innate immune response is a key promoter to the progress of alveolar bone loss when periodontal inflammation happens (17, 18). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) includes endogenous nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and exogenous bacterial or viral DNA (19, 20). cfDNA plays the role of the ligands to DNA-sensing pathways, such as Toll-like Receptor 9 (TLR9), which can initiate the innate immune response, activate NF-κB signaling that leads to the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, and cause inflammatory alveolar bone loss (17). In patients with periodontitis, cfDNA level in the gingival crevicular fluid is correlated with the degree of periodontitis (21–23). We recently confirmed that clearance of cfDNA can help alleviate alveolar bone loss by inhibiting TLR9 activation (17). As we have demonstrated the possible similarity between bone loss after bone grafting and the development of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis, herein, we hypothesize that cfDNA- and TLR9-related innate immune responses can also take part in the postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting.

Postoperative bone loss after bone grafting possibly happens as the following: (1) surgery leads to sterile Inflammation, which increases the levels of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (24, 25); (2) It is impossible to be a totally sterile environment in oral and maxillofacial surgery (26), which can lead to the increasing levels of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs); (3) cfDNA levels will be increased because of the accumulation of DAMPs and PAMPs, and will consequently activate the TLR9/NF-κB pathway (19, 20) and may lead to the bone loss after alveolar bone grafting. In this perspective, we try to preliminarily demonstrate that cfDNA- and TLR9-related innate immune responses could happen after alveolar bone grafting in patients with alveolar bone cleft, which possibly is associated with postoperative bone loss, by showing pilot analyses of the pre- and post-operative levels of cfDNA in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and serum of patients and use in vitro study to confirm that the cfDNA- and TLR9-related innate immune response can be activated after bone grafting surgery.

cfDNA-related innate immune responses after alveolar bone grafting

Increasing cfDNA levels after alveolar bone grafting in GCF and serum of patients

To determine whether cfDNA levels were increased in the body fluids of patients after alveolar bone grafting, 16 patients with alveolar bone cleft and without obvious periodontal inflammation were enrolled in this study. Patients were asked to have oral hygiene one month before the surgery, and the periodontal health of all patients with intact periodontium had no probing attachment loss, probing pocket depth ≤ 3mm, bleeding on probing < 10%, and no radiological bone loss (27). All the patients finished their cleft lip repair and palatoplasty before 2 years old. The surgery for the alveolar bone grafting was performed by the same surgeon, and the bone for grafting was collected from the iliac bone. Patient sample collection was performed with the approval of the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (WCHSIRB-CT-2020-272). All participants in this study signed an informed consent form before sample collection.

GCF and serum sampling were conducted before (preoperative) and 2 days after alveolar bone grafting (postoperative) (17, 18, 28). GCF sampling was performed on the teeth nearest to the cleft and surgical sites, which indicated the local inflammatory environment change at the surgical sites. The serum might demonstrate possible inflammatory environment change of the whole body because of the surgery, as surgery can cause damage to the tissue and lead to sterile inflammation. Extraction of cfDNA from GCF and serum was performed with a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Concentrations of cfDNA in GCF and serum were measured with a Quant-iT PicoGreen double-stranded DNA Assay Kit. The statistical analyses were accomplished by Prism 8 (GraphPad). Paired t-test was used to compare the mean value between the two groups.

We found that 2 days after alveolar bone grafting, which involved the trauma to the periodontal tissues near the cleft and the trauma to the iliac bone, cfDNA levels in the GCF and serum increased significantly, while the increase was more significant in GCF (Figures 1A, B). Herein we confirmed that cfDNA could be associated with surgery, and the changing of cfDNA levels might be imputed to surgical damage to the local tissues and the potential infection in the oral environment. Based on the results, with cfDNA increasing in local sites of GCF, the following cfDNA-induced inflammation can happen, so then we carried out the in vitro study for preliminary exploration.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 GCF and serum in patients after alveolar bone grafting induced stronger cfDNA-related innate immune responses. (A, B) Increasing cfDNA levels after alveolar bone grafting in GCF and serum of patients with alveolar bone cleft. Data are means ± SEM; *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 assessed by paired t-test (n = 16). (C, D) Activation of HEK-TLR9 reporter cells by GCF and serum from patients with alveolar bone cleft before and after alveolar bone grafting. Data are means ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test (n = 3). (E, F) TNF-α expression activated by GCF and serum from patients with alveolar bone cleft before and after alveolar bone grafting. Data are means ± SEM; *P < 0.05 by Student’s t-test (n = 3). (G, H) IL-6 expression activated by GCF and serum from patients with alveolar bone cleft before and after alveolar bone grafting. Data are means ± SEM; **P < 0.01 by Student’s t-test (n = 3). (I–K) Morphological changes of macrophages by patients’ GCF after alveolar bone grafting. Arrows show significant morphological changes in cells. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Cellular TLR9 signaling activated by the body fluids of the patients after alveolar bone grafting

Next, we evaluated whether the GCF and serum could lead to higher activation of the cellular TLR9 signaling. Stable hTLR9-overexpressing HEK-Blue cells were purchased from In vivoGen (San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) and were initially propagated in DMEM with 10% (v/v) FBS and maintained in growth medium supplemented with selective antibiotics (50 U/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 μg/ml Normocin, 2 mM L-glutamine). Before treatment, certain numbers of HEK-Blue hTLR9 cells (8 × 10⁴ cells/well hTLR9 cells) were seeded and cultured in basal DMEM overnight in 96-well plates, then stimulated with one microliter of human GCF and 20 μL of human serum from the patient who had alveolar bone grafting pre- and 2 days postoperatively, respectively. After 24 h, the activation of reporter cells was determined with the QUANTI-Blue medium with testing the secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) activity. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean value between the two groups. Different compositions and levels of cfDNA can lead to different levels of TLR9 response, so the higher cellular activation of HEK-Blue TLR9 cells means the cfDNA in the GCF and serum can stimulate higher TLR9 activation (17). Our results demonstrated that 2-days-postoperative GCF and serum induced significantly higher TLR9 activation in HEK-Blue TLR9 cells than the GCF and serum from the preoperative (Figures 1C, D), which verified that cfDNA from 2-days-postoperative GCF and serum could possibly cause a more significant proinflammatory response by inducing TLR9 pathway.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Schematic of mechanism that cfDNA and other DAMPs and PAMPs can promote bone loss initiated by surgical trauma during alveolar bone grafting. Surgery can accumulated cfDNA and other DAMPs and PAMPs, and these molecules can consistently activate the TLR9 and other PRR pathways, which activate the innate immune response and lead to bone loss after alveolar bone grafting. (Created with BioRender.com).

We then tested whether 2-days-postoperative GCF and serum caused a prominent increase in TNF-α and IL-6 levels in RAW 264.7 macrophages than the GCF and serum from the preoperative. RAW 264.7 cells were seeded and cultured in basal DMEM overnight at 2×10⁴ cells per well in a 96-well plate. One microliter of human GCF and 20 μL of human serum were then added into the well. After incubation for 24 h, the supernatants were collected and TNF-α and IL-6 levels were measured using ELISA kits purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A). Paired t-test was used to compare the mean value between the two groups. The outcomes demonstrated that both TNF-α and IL-6 levels were increased, while the increase was significant by stimuli of GCF (Figures 1E–H). Together, these results suggested that cellular TLR9 signaling can be activated by the body fluids of the patients after alveolar bone grafting.

Morphological changes of macrophages by the patients’ GCF after alveolar bone grafting

Macrophage polarization could be affected by the microenvironment in the periodontal tissues, and the phenotypes of macrophages could determine the final osteogenesis of the alveolar bone (29). Thus, we carried out a preliminary experiment by observing the morphological changes of macrophages by the stimuli of preoperative and postoperative GCF following the published protocol (17). Human monocyte THP-1 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, U.S.A.) and applied. THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and selective antibiotics. 8×10⁴ cells were plated in 96-well plates in 200 µL RPMI media plus 25 ng/mL phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) for 48 h, and one microliter of pre- and post-operative GCF was added during the final 18 h of treatment. After incubation, the morphology of cells was observed, which was altered by treatment with postoperative GCF, and dendrite-like change could be found (Figures 1I–K). This finding demonstrated postoperative GCF might have more stimulus that could alter the phenotypes of macrophages, but needed further investigation to confirm this hypothesis.

Discussion and perspectives

Alveolar bone cleft is one of the most common craniofacial birth defects, often companied by cleft lip and palate (30). Alveolar bone cleft can influence the development of tooth and dental germ, including the quantity, morphology and position of tooth (31–33). Alveolar bone grafting is the standard treatment of clinics for alveolar bone cleft at present (34). A successful alveolar bone grafting has several purposes, including the bony continuity in the maxillary arch (5, 6), the stabilization of maxillary dental arch (7), the preservation for periodontal health of adjacent teeth (35, 36), the induction of permanent tooth eruption (1, 4) and implant placement (37). For getting successful operation outcomes, it’s indispensable to comprehend how multiple factors influence the surgical outcome.

Significant controversy for influence factors to a successful operation exists, in which the operation age (38), the cleft width (1, 39) and the cleft volume (40), presence of the lateral incisor, and the eruption and root development of the cleft-adjacent canine (41) are in a heated discussion. However, even though the aforementioned factors have been taken care of, the improvement in surgical outcomes was not significant yet, and postoperative alveolar bone loss still exists. Recently, poor oral hygiene became another hotspot in the success of alveolar cleft reconstruction surgery, which was similar to periodontitis (3, 16, 42). Thus, a new aspect based on this concept could be the potential for solving this problem.

As alveolar bone belongs to the periodontal tissues, we hypothesize that the mechanism of the alveolar bone loss in patients with alveolar bone cleft after bone grafting surgery may be similar to the development of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis. Another inflammation, peri-implantitis, which also happens in periodontal tissue, should also be mentioned in terms of our concept. It was found that a more pronounced inflammatory response was expressed in peri-implantitis than in periodontitis, which caused alveolar bone loss and failure of implant treatments (43, 44).

From our perspective, the progress of alveolar bone loss in surgical treatment for alveolar bone cleft can be similar to periodontitis and peri-implantitis. In periodontitis and peri-implantitis, during the innate immune response, the levels of PAMPs increase with dying bacteria (45); meanwhile, local inflammation causes cell death and accumulates DAMPs (46). Thus, in the inflammatory microenvironment of periodontitis and peri-implantitis, a collection of both PAMPs and DAMPs could continuously activate the immune systems and promote alveolar bone loss. In the situation of alveolar bone grafting in patients with alveolar bone cleft, surgeries in both the alveolar region and iliac bone region might contribute to the increase of DAMPs, accompanied by PAMPs generated in the oral cavity, which triggered the local immune response together and led to the postoperative alveolar bone loss (Figure 2).

Pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), such as TLRs, which detect DAMPs and PAMPs, can initiate innate immune response (47, 48). Inappropriate activation of TLR9 happened in patients with periodontitis (49), as increased TLR9 levels can be found in their periodontal tissue (50). Meanwhile, TLR9-deficient mice are resistant to periodontitis (51, 52). We have confirmed that cfDNA can be a major source that enhances periodontal tissue destruction by activating TLR9 pathway, and targeting cfDNA and TLR9 pathway can help ameliorate periodontitis (17). Thus, based on the possible similarity between postoperative alveolar bone loss and periodontitis, we assumed that cfDNA- and TLR9-related innate immune responses could be a major inducement for postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting. According to our outcomes, we preliminarily proved the potential association between cfDNA, TLR9 pathway, and alveolar bone grafting operation: Surgical trauma could accumulate cfDNA, and activate cellular TLR9 signaling in vitro.

Macrophages in the mononuclear phagocyte system are important in periodontal inflammation, as M1/M2 phenotypes can switch dynamically with the progression of periodontitis (53–55). We also observed morphological changes in macrophages with the stimuli of postoperative GCF, which is similar to the situation of periodontitis (17), which could be related to the M1/M2 phenotypes alteration. However, further study should be carried out to confirm this concept.

In this perspective, we hypothesize the potential enhancement by DNA sensing and TLR9-related innate immune responses to postoperative bone loss, and further experiments are necessary to elucidate the association between cfDNA, TLR9 pathway, and alveolar bone grafting operation associated with surgical trauma. Meanwhile, other PRR-related pathways should also be investigated in further study. For example, the TLR2 pathway has been confirmed both in the pathogenesis of periodontitis and peri-implantitis (56, 57); LPS and TLR4 pathway has been widely studied for the regulation in periodontitis and peri-implantitis (43, 56); and also other PRRs pathways should be considered (47, 48). Similarly, multiple cells, such as natural killer cells, mast cells, and neutrophils, should also be studied in the future as they are involved in innate immune responses (58). For the polarization of macrophages, further study should be concentrated on detecting phenotype markers by histology and flow cytometry. In summary, inflammation can be a potential source and target for managing postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting.

Concluding remarks

From this perspective, we propose that cfDNA can be the major source that enhances postoperative bone loss after alveolar bone grafting in patients with alveolar bone cleft, and targeting cfDNA and related pathways could be the potential therapeutic strategy to improve the treatment for patients with alveolar bone cleft.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (WCHSIRB-CT-2020-272). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author contributions

HH and RY contributed to the collection of data, analyses of the data, and writing and revising of the paper. HH and BS supervised the research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research and Development Program, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (RD-02-202107), Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2022NSFSC0743), and Sichuan Postdoctoral Science Foundation (TB2022005) grant to HH.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Long RE, Spangler BE, Yow M. Cleft width and secondary alveolar bone graft success. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J (1995) 32(5):420–7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0420_cwasab_2.3.co_2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dissaux C, Ruffenach L, Bruant-Rodier C, George D, Bodin F, Rémond Y. Cleft alveolar bone graft materials: Literature review. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J (2021) 59(3):336–46. doi: 10.1177/10556656211007692

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lundberg J, Levring Jäghagen E, Sjöström M. Outcome after secondary alveolar bone grafting among patients with cleft lip and palate at 16 years of age: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol (2021) 132(3):281–7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.04.057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Enemark H, Krantz-Simonsen E, Schramm JE. Secondary bonegrafting in unilateral cleft lip palate patients: indications and treatment procedure. Int J Oral Surg (1985) 14(1):2–10. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80003-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm F, Borchgrevink H, Eskeland G. Secondary bone grafting and orthodontic treatment in patients with bilateral complete clefts of the lip and palate. Ann Plast Surg (1986) 17(6):460–74. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198612000-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J (1986) 23(3):175–205.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Turvey TA, Hall DJ. Intraoral self-threading screw fixation for sagittal osteotomies: early experiences. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg (1986) 1(4):243–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Toscano D, Baciliero U, Gracco A, Siciliani G. Long-term stability of alveolar bone grafts in cleft palate patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2012) 142(3):289–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Jabbari F, Wiklander L, Reiser E, Thor A, Hakelius M, Nowinski D. Secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients born with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A 20-year follow-up. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (2018) 55(2):173–9. doi: 10.1177/1055665617726999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. White DJ. Dental calculus: recent insights into occurrence, formation, prevention, removal and oral health effects of supragingival and subgingival deposits. Eur J Oral Sci (1997) 105(5):508–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00238.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bakdash B. Oral hygiene and compliance as risk factors in periodontitis. J Periodontol (1994) 65(5 Suppl):539–44. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.5s.539

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lertpimonchai A, Rattanasiri S, Arj-Ong Vallibhakara S, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent J (2017) 67(6):332–43. doi: 10.1111/idj.12317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Salvi GE, Brägger U, Lang NP. Periodontal attachment loss over 14 years in cleft lip, alveolus and palate (CLAP, CL, CP) subjects not enrolled in a supportive periodontal therapy program. J Clin Periodontol (2003) 30(9):840–5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00390.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schultes G, Gaggl A, Kärcher H. Comparison of periodontal disease in patients with clefts of palate and patients with unilateral clefts of lip, palate, and alveolus. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (1999) 36(4):322–7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1999_036_0322_copdip_2.3.co_2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rawashdeh MA, Ayesh JA, Darwazeh AM. Oral candidal colonization in cleft patients as a function of age, gender, surgery, type of cleft, and oral health. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2011) 69(4):1207–13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Najar Chalien M, Mark H, Rizell S. Predictive factors for secondary alveolar bone graft failure in patients with cleft alveolus. Orthod Craniofac Res (2022) 25(4):585–91. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huang H, Pan W, Wang Y, Kim HS, Shao D, Huang B, et al. Nanoparticulate cell-free DNA scavenger for treating inflammatory bone loss in periodontitis. Nat Commun (2022) 13(1):5925. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33492-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Zhu X, Chu C-J, Pan W, Li Y, Huang H, Zhao L. The correlation between periodontal parameters and cell-free DNA in the gingival crevicular fluid, saliva, and plasma in Chinese patients: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Med (2022) 11(23):6902. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236902

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, et al. DNA Fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res (2001) 61(4):1659–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Breitbach S, Tug S, Simon P. Circulating cell-free DNA: an up-coming molecular marker in exercise physiology. Sports Med (Auckland NZ) (2012) 42(7):565–86. doi: 10.2165/11631380-000000000-00000

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Abuhussein H, Bashutski JD, Dabiri D, Halubai S, Layher M, Klausner C, et al. The role of factors associated with apoptosis in assessing periodontal disease status. J periodontol (2014) 85(8):1086–95. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. White PC, Chicca IJ, Cooper PR, Milward MR, Chapple IL. Neutrophil extracellular traps in periodontitis: A web of intrigue. J Dent Res (2016) 95(1):26–34. doi: 10.1177/0022034515609097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Thaweboon B, Suwannagindra S, Kerdvongbundit V, Thaweboon S. Using absorbent paper strips for the collection of cell-free DNA in patients with periodontal diseases. IOP Conf Series: Materials Sci Engineering (2019) 649:12010. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/649/1/012010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Huber-Lang M, Lambris JD, Ward PA. Innate immune responses to trauma. Nat Immunol (2018) 19(4):327–41. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0064-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zindel J, Kubes P. DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in immunity and sterile inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol (2020) 15:493–518. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bali RK. Operating room protocols and infection control. In: Bonanthaya K, Panneerselvam E, Manuel S, Kumar VV, Rai A, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore (2021). p. 173–94.

Google Scholar

27. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol (2018) 89(S1):S173–S82. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wassall RR, Preshaw PM. Clinical and technical considerations in the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid. Periodontol 2000 (2016) 70(1):65–79. doi: 10.1111/prd.12109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Azevedo MCS, Fonseca AC, Colavite PM, Melchiades JL, Tabanez AP, Codo AC, et al. Macrophage polarization and alveolar bone healing outcome: Despite a significant M2 polarizing effect, VIP and PACAP treatments present a minor impact in alveolar bone healing in homeostatic conditions. Front Immunol (2021) 12:782566. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.782566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Shi B, Losee JE. The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth. Int J Oral Sci (2015) 7(1):14–7. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.59

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ranta R. A review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (1986) 90(1):11–8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90022-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lai MC, King NM, Wong HM. Dental development of Chinese children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (2008) 45(3):289–96. doi: 10.1597/07-019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hellquist R, Linder-Aronson S, Norling M, Ponten B, Stenberg T. Dental abnormalities in patients with alveolar clefts, operated upon with or without primary periosteoplasty. Eur J Orthod (1979) 1(3):169–80.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Boyne PJ, Sands NR. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J Oral Surg (1972) 30(2):87–92.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Walle NM, Forbes DP. The effect of size characteristics of alveolar cleft defects on bone graft success: a retrospective study. Northwest Dent Res (1992) 3(2):5–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Tan AE, Brogan WF, McComb HK, Henry PJ. Secondary alveolar bone grafting–five-year periodontal and radiographic evaluation in 100 consecutive cases. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (1996) 33(6):513–8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0513:SABGFY>2.3.CO;2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mahajan R, Ghildiyal H, Khasgiwala A, Muthukrishnan G, Kahlon S. Evaluation of secondary and late secondary alveolar bone grafting on 66 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Surg (Oakv) (2017) 25(3):194–9. doi: 10.1177/2292550317728035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Dissaux C, Bodin F, Grollemund B, Bridonneau T, Kauffmann I, Mattern J-F, et al. Evaluation of success of alveolar cleft bone graft performed at 5 years versus 10 years of age. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg (2016) 44(1):21–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Wiedel AP, Svensson H, Schonmeyr B, Becker M. An analysis of complications in secondary bone grafting in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Plast Surg Handb Surg (2016) 50(2):63–7. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1086364

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Blessmann Weber JB, de Macedo Menezes L, Azeredo F, Lessa Filho LS. Volumetric assessment of alveolar clefts: a literature review. J Oral Pathol Med (2017) 46(8):569–73. doi: 10.1111/jop.12548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ozawa T, Omura S, Fukuyama E, Matsui Y, Torikai K, Fujita K. Factors influencing secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: prospective analysis using CT image analyzer. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (2007) 44(3):286–91. doi: 10.1597/06-054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Suvan JE, Sabalic M, Araújo MR, Ramseier CA. Behavioral strategies for periodontal health. Periodontol 2000 (2022) 90(1):247–61. doi: 10.1111/prd.12462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Deng S, Hu Y, Zhou J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li S, et al. TLR4 mediates alveolar bone resorption in experimental peri-implantitis through regulation of CD45(+) cell infiltration, RANKL/OPG ratio, and inflammatory cytokine production. J Periodontol (2020) 91(5):671–82. doi: 10.1002/jper.18-0748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Meffert RM. Periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis: the same disease? the same treatment? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med (1996) 7(3):278–91. doi: 10.1177/10454411960070030501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Negi S, Das DK, Pahari S, Nadeem S, Agrewala JN. Potential role of gut microbiota in induction and regulation of innate immune memory. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Anderton H, Wicks IP, Silke J. Cell death in chronic inflammation: breaking the cycle to treat rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2020) 16(9):496–513. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0455-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell (2010) 140(6):805–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Zhu X, Huang H, Zhao L. PAMPs and DAMPs as the bridge between periodontitis and atherosclerosis: The potential therapeutic targets. Front Cell Dev Biol (2022) 10:856118. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.856118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Chen Y-C, Liu C-M, Jeng J-H, Ku C-C. Association of pocket epithelial cell proliferation in periodontitis with TLR9 expression and inflammatory response. J Formosan Med Assoc (2014) 113(8):549–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.07.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Narayan I, Gowda TM, Mehta DS, Kumar BT. Estimation of toll-like receptor 9 in gingival tissues of patients with chronic periodontitis with or without hyperlipidemia and its association with the presence of porphyromonas gingivalis. J Indian Soc Periodontol (2018) 22(4):298–303. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_124_18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kim PD, Xia-Juan X, Crump KE, Abe T, Hajishengallis G, Sahingur SE. Toll-like receptor 9-mediated inflammation triggers alveolar bone loss in experimental murine periodontitis. Infection immunity (2015) 83(7):2992–3002. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00424-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Crump KE, Oakley JC, Xia-Juan X, Madu TC, Devaki S, Mooney EC, et al. Interplay of toll-like receptor 9, myeloid cells, and deubiquitinase A20 in periodontal inflammation. Infection immunity (2016) 85(1):e00814–16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00814-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Wilensky A, Segev H, Mizraji G, Shaul Y, Capucha T, Shacham M, et al. Dendritic cells and their role in periodontal disease. Oral Dis (2014) 20(2):119–26. doi: 10.1111/odi.12122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Zhou LN, Bi CS, Gao LN, An Y, Chen F, Chen FM. Macrophage polarization in human gingival tissue in response to periodontal disease. Oral Dis (2019) 25(1):265–73. doi: 10.1111/odi.12983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Yang J, Zhu Y, Duan D, Wang P, Xin Y, Bai L, et al. Enhanced activity of macrophage M1/M2 phenotypes in periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol (2018) 96:234–42. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Song B, Zhang Y, Chen L, Zhou T, Huang W, Zhou X, et al. The role of toll-like receptors in periodontitis. Oral Diseases (2017) 23(2):168–80. doi: 10.1111/odi.12468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zhang Q, Liu J, Ma L, Bai N, Xu H. LOX-1 is involved in TLR2 induced RANKL regulation in peri-implantitis. Int Immunopharmacol (2019) 77:105956. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105956

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Marshall JS, Warrington R, Watson W, Kim HL. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol (2018) 14(2):49. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0278-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar