Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 09 December 2022
Sec. NK and Innate Lymphoid Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in NK and Innate Lymphoid Cell Biology View all 9 articles

Inflammatory-driven NK cell maturation and its impact on pathology

  • Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1223, Lymphocyte and Immunity Unit, Paris, France

NK cells are innate lymphocytes involved in a large variety of contexts and are crucial in the immunity to intracellular pathogens as well as cancer due to their ability to kill infected or malignant cells. Thus, they harbor a strong potential for clinical and therapeutic use. NK cells do not require antigen exposure to get activated; their functional response is rather based on a balance between inhibitory/activating signals and on the diversity of germline-encoded receptors they express. In order to reach optimal functional status, NK cells go through a step-wise development in the bone marrow before their egress, and dissemination into peripheral organs via the circulation. In this review, we summarize bone marrow NK cell developmental stages and list key factors involved in their differentiation before presenting newly discovered and emerging factors that regulate NK cell central and peripheral maturation. Lastly, we focus on the impact inflammatory contexts themselves can have on NK cell development and functional maturation.

Introduction

NK cells are part of the innate lymphoid cell (ILC) family and are involved in a large variety of contexts. They are crucial in the immunity to intracellular pathogens as well as cancer due to their ability to kill infected or malignant cells (1). In contrast to T cells, NK cells do not require antigen exposure to get activated and start producing pro-inflammatory cytokines and/or mediating cytolytic activities. Their functional response is rather based on a balance between inhibitory/activating signals and on the diversity of germline-encoded receptors expressed at their surface. NK cells share a lot of similarities with type 1 ILCs (ILC1s), formerly termed “tissue-resident NK cells” (2, 3). They both secrete type 1 cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interferon gamma (IFNγ) and can be activated by interleukin (IL)-12, IL-15 and/or IL-18. However, to the exception of few tissues such as liver, most ILC1s are non-cytotoxic cells (4).

In order to reach optimal functional status, NK cells go through a step-wise development in the bone marrow before their egress. After, dissemination into peripheral organs via the circulation (5), they can undergo their final stages of maturation. Because NK cells harbor a strong potential for clinical and therapeutic use, it is important to continue unveiling the molecular mechanisms regulating their development and maturation especially in inflammatory contexts. In this review, we first summarize bone marrow NK cell developmental stages and list key factors involved in their differentiation such as γc-chain related cytokines and transcription factors. Then, we present newly discovered and emerging factors regulating NK cell maturation and functional response which could constitute new targets for NK cell-base therapies. Lastly, we discuss the possible impact of the inflammatory context on NK cell maturation and the detrimental or beneficial consequences on the physiopathology.

Development and functions of NK cells

Murine and human developmental stages in the bone marrow

In adult mice, the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), precursors of all leukocytes and erythrocytes, can differentiate into common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) cells defined as Lin- cKitlow IL7Rα (CD127)+ Flt3+ (6). The CLP cells give rise to pre-T, pro-B cells, common innate lymphoid progenitor (CILP) cells as well as pre-NK progenitors (pre-NKp) expressing CD244 (2B4) which then differentiate into refined NK progenitors (rNKp) (7, 8). The commitment to the NK lineage is marked by the expression of the IL-2 receptor β chain (CD122) (Figure 1A) (9). The rNKps then progress toward the immature NK (iNK) stage which is itself divided into several stages, each characterized by the appearance of lineage-specific markers. Thus, iNK cells acquire in a sequential manner C-type lectin-like activating receptors NKG2D and CD161 (NK1.1), and the natural cytotoxicity receptor 1 (NCR1) also termed NKp46 (Figure 1A) (10, 11). iNK cells are capable to secrete IFNγ and were shown to mediate TRAIL-dependent cytotoxicity (12, 13). Functionally NK cells arise from iNK cells and require the acquisition of CD49b and Ly49 receptors that recognize MHC-I molecules (14). The functional maturation of NK cells is usually divided into 3 stages based on different expression levels of CD27 and CD11b markers: CD27+ CD11b- cells give rise to double positive (DP, Figure 1A) cells which then differentiate into the final CD27- CD11b+ stage (14). Immature CD27+ NK cells display the proeminent proliferative potential. The two CD11b CD27+ and CD11b+ CD27+ NK cell stages present the best ability to secrete cytokines with CD27 being directly implicated in this process (15, 16). Therefore, the terminal stage of maturation is marked by the expressions of CD11b (Mac-1), CD43 and KLRG1 as well as the downregulation of the CD27 marker (Figure 1A) (15, 17). Terminally differentiated CD27- CD11b+ mature (m)NK cells have increased cytotoxic activity. Hence, along they terminal maturation, NK cells slowly increase their cytotoxic capacity while reduce their possibilities for homeostatic expansion (15).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Simplified model of developmental stages of murine (A) and human (B) NK cells in the bone marrow. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; CLP, common lymphoid progenitor; rNKp, refined NK progenitor; iNK, imature NK cell.

Although ILC1s and NK cells share a common lymphoid progenitor, they mostly arise from distinct developmental pathways (18, 19). Nonetheless, Id2+ progenitors were shown to be able to give rise to both helper ILCs and NK cells (20). Early lymphoid progenitors with innate specificities were identified in the BM as TCF-1+ cells (21). Mechanisms that drive helper versus cytotoxic lineages are still unclear as only a minor fraction of NK cells are labelled by Zbtb16 suggesting a main NK cell developmental pathway upstream of the common helper innate lymphoid progenitor (CHILP) (18, 22). Globally, ID2+ CHILP can give rise to all ILC subsets while the more committed PLZF+ precursor is giving rise to mature ILC1s, ILC2s or ILC3s (18, 20, 22). Recently, ILC1s present in the peripheral tissues were described as TCF-1hi precursors that could differentiate in situ into cytotoxic-like ILC1 through the upregulation of the Hobit transcription factor (23). Moreover, some hematopoietic progenitors Lin-Sca1+Mac1+, called LSM were detected in the adult liver and were able to differentiate into diverse hematopoietic fates despite a preference for ILC1s over NK cells (24).

In humans, NK cell development is composed of 6 stages which are quite similar to those in mice although several surface markers differ between the two species. Lin- CD34+ CD133+ human HSCs differentiate into Lin- CD34+ CD244+ pre-NKp cells (Stage 1) that irreversibly commit to NK lineage through the expression of CD122 as well as the IL-1β receptor IL1R1 (Figure 1B) (25). Human rNKPs (stage 2) then give rise to human equivalent of iNK cells (Stage 3) through the expression of CD161 and NKG2D (26). The appearance of CD56 marks the transition from Stage 3 to Stage 4 along with NKp46, NKp30, NKp80 and NKG2A expressions (Figure 1B) (27). NK cells can be further divided based on their surface expression level of CD56. CD56bright NK cells are considered more immature (Stage 4) and are able give rise to CD56dim NK cells which start upregulating CD16 (FcγRIII) at the same time (Stage 5). Most terminal mature NK stage (Stage 6) is defined by the expression of CD57 and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR), the latter representing the human counterparts of mice Ly49 receptors (Figure 1B) (28). While CD56bright NK cells are considered strong producers of pro-inflammatory cytokines, CD56dim NK cells harbor an enhanced cytotoxicity. However, Wagner et al. challenged this paradigm by demonstrating that IL-15 priming of CD56brigh NK cells resulted in an enhanced and potent antitumor response of these cells in vitro and in in vivo murine xenograft models (29). Interestingly, an intermediate subset of CD56dim NK cells expressing CD62L was identified (30). CD56dim CD62L+ NK cells displayed high proliferative ability as well as IFNγ secretion after cytokine stimulation in a similar manner as CD56bright NK cells. Yet, CD62L+ and CD62L- CD56dim but not CD56bright NK cells were able to respond to activating receptor stimulation.

NK cells primarily develop in the bone marrow (BM) although some studies suggested the existence of peripheral and thymic development of NK cells. Briefly, GATA-3+ CD127+ NK cells have been identified in the murine thymus with a distinct origin from BM NK cells (31). These thymus-derived NK cells were able to repopulate peripheral lymphoid organs and presented a phenotype similar to that of CD56bright NK cells in humans with decreased cytotoxicity but potent cytokine production. NK cell development can also take place in periphery (liver, spleen, lymph nodes) although this peripheral maturation likely results from the migration of BM NK progenitors rather than distinct developmental pathways (32).

Molecules driving NK cell development and maturation

γc chain cytokines

Many cytokines are involved in NK cell development and maturation. Among them is the family of common gamma (γc) cytokines composed of several interleukins (IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15 and IL-21) all signaling through the transmembrane glycoprotein γc chain (33). Its importance in NK cell development is highlighted by the fact that γc-/- mice lack NK cells as well as all helper ILCs (34).

While IL-7 is necessary for lymphoid development with CLPs expressing high levels of IL-7Rα, mice deficient in IL-7 or IL-7Rα actually display normal NK cell maturation in the BM indicating that IL-7 is not required for NK cell development (35, 36). Human IL-7 knocked-in in NOD Scid Gamma (NSG) mice also revealed that IL-7 is not sufficient to induce human NK cell development (37). However, it was shown that murine thymic CD127+ NK cell homeostasis depends on IL-7 (31). In humans, Michaud et al. demonstrated that IL-7 enhanced the survival of CD56bright NK cells by increasing BCL2 expression although their cytoxicity, cytokine production and activation marker expression were not impacted (38).

IL-2 and IL-15 both signal through the γc and IL-2Rβ chains but differ in their alpha subunit. They respectively trigger STAT1 and STAT5. IL-2Rα (CD25) is upregulated on activated NK cells and drives a IL-2-dependent proliferation and production of the cytotoxic molecules perforin and granzyme B. IL-2 can also play a role in human NK cell survival (39). Yet, IL-2-deficient mice exhibit normal NK cell development (40).

On the other hand, mice lacking IL-15, IL-15Rα or IL-2Rβ display specific NK cell near-loss revealing an essential and non-redundant role for this cytokine in NK cell development and maturation (4143). Transgenic overexpression of IL-15 leads to increased NK production (44). Several studies demonstrated that IL-15 also regulates human NK cell homeostasis. Using Rag2−/−γc−/− mice transplanted with human hematopoietic stem cells, Huntington and al showed that human IL-15 induced NK cell proliferation and differentiation leading to an accumulation of CD16+KIR+ mature NK cells (45). An Il2RB mutation in siblings leading to the dysregulation of IL-2/IL-15 signaling revealed an expansion in CD56bright NK cells but a strong defect in terminally mature NK cells causing ultimately autoimmunity and increased susceptibility to Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (46).

IL-15 acts on cells as soon as CD122 is upregulated at the rNKP stage and continues to drive their maturation into mNK cells. It can signal through IL-2Rβ/γc heterodimer either alone with poor affinity or through transpresentation via IL-15Rα with high affinity. The latter consists in IL-15 binding to IL-15Rα expressed at the surface of presenting cells (dendritic cells, macrophages, stromal cells…) and being transpresented to IL-2Rβ/γc-expressing NK cells (4749). The importance of this mechanism was demonstrated with adoptive transfer experiments where the injected NK cell pool was not maintained in IL-15Rα-deficient hosts while IL-15Rα-deficient NK cells transferred in wild-type (WT) mice were able to survive (50). IL-15 is also involved in murine and human NK cell survival and proliferation both in central and periphery (51, 52).

IL-21 was shown to synergize with IL-2 resulting in an increase of NKG2A, CD25, CD86, CD69, perforin and granzyme B expression in human CD56bright NK cells (53). IL-21 was sufficient to maintain human NK cells alive in contrast to their murine counterpart to which IL-21 alone fails to sustain their survival. A cell line with membrane bound IL-21 was shown to induce robust and sustained proliferation of human NK cells (54). The expanded NK cells displayed higher cytotoxic activity against blood and solid tumor cells when compared to IL-2-activated NK cells. Mechanistically, membrane-bound IL-21 led to the activation of STAT3/c-Myc pathway and promoted aerobic glycolysis in NK cells. This “NK cell feeder cell line” constitutes a novel strategy enabling expansion and activation of NK cells prior to their use in clinical studies and therapies.

Altogether, this places NK cells at the center of multiple interactions with γc chain cytokine-producing cells.

Transcription factors

NK cell development is regulated by a vast network of transcription factors acting sequentially from the earliest progenitor to the terminally differentiated stage. We selected only a few of them, some playing a role during early development and others during late maturation.

Nfil3 (also termed E4BP4) specifically impact NK cell development as Nfil3-deficient mice display a specific lack of NK progenitor cells and mature NKs despite an early expression among CLPs (55, 56). Interestingly, it was demonstrated that deletion of Nfil3 at the rNKP stage (or later stages) did not influence NK cell numbers nor their functional response (57). On the other hand, ectopic expression of Nfil3 in CLPs was able to restore NK cell development in Nfil3-/- mice (58). Altogether, this suggests that Nfil3 is required for NK cell lineage commitment, particularly at the transition from CLP to rNKP but is dispensable for NK cell maturation.

Another key transcription factor in NK cell development is STAT5, downstream of IL-15. When IL-15 (or IL-15/IL-15Rα complex) is presented to the cell, the Janus Kinase (JAK)-1 and JAK-3 are respectively recruited to IL-2Rβ and γc leading to STAT3 and STAT5 phosphorylation. The importance of the JAK-1/3-STAT5 pathway in maintaining NK cell development has been known for decades with JAK-3- and STAT5b-deficient mice displaying severe lack of NK cell maturation and function (59, 60). Conditional deletion of STAT5 in NCR1-positive cells also showed an abrogation of NK cell maturation in the BM (61) confirming the crucial role of STAT5 in NK cell development.

The highly homologous T-box transcription factors T-bet and Eomesodermin (Eomes) are known to be essential and necessary for NK cell development and maturation. In Tbx21-/- mice, NK cell numbers are significantly lower in periphery however slightly higher in the BM (62). It was shown that T-bet can bind to the S1pr5 locus and thus promotes its expression (63). Decreased expression of S1pr5 in Tbx21-/- mice then leads to an impaired NK cell egress from the BM which can explain the drop in peripheral NK cells (64). T-bet was also shown to promote NK cell maturation as T-bet-deficient NK cells display lower levels of several maturation markers such as CD11b, DX5 and CD43 (62). Conditional deletion of Eomes in NCR1-positive cells leads to a compromised NK cell development with decreased NK cells in the periphery as well as in the BM (65, 66). Acquisition of DX5, Ly49 receptors and cytotoxicity were shown to be dependent upon Eomes and deletion of Eomes in NK cells led to a reversion to a more immature stage (67). Finally, loss of both transcription factors resulted in a complete depletion of NK cells (67) supporting the idea that T-bet and Eomes, while acting at different stages of maturation, also play redundant roles and can partially compensate for one another.

Downstream of T-bet is the transcriptional repressor B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp-1) encoded by Prdm1 (68). Blimp-1 is induced by IL-15 and controls cytokine production in both human and murine NK cells (68, 69). Blimp-1 is required for NK cell homeostasis and maturation and negatively regulates their proliferation. Loss of Blimp-1 results in decreased expression of maturation markers KLRG1 and CD43.

mTOR pathway

Another key regulator of NK cell development is the mechanistic target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. mTOR is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase capable of integrating two structurally distinct complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. mTORC1 is composed of mTOR, Raptor, DEPTOR, PRAS40 and mLST8 proteins while mTORC2 comprises mTOR, Rictor, DEPTOR, mLST8, Proctor1/2 and mSin1 (70). mTORC1 is sensitive to its inhibitor rapamycin whereas mTORC2 is mostly insensitive to it. These two complexes regulate various biological processes such as proliferation, cell growth and metabolism. Downstream of the IL-15 receptor IL-2Rβ/γc is the PI (3)K-mTOR pathway which can initiate transcription related to NK cell maturation and function. PI (3)K can activate mTORC1 through the canonical PI3K-PDK1-Akt-TSC1/2-mTORC1 pathway as well as mTORC2 although less is known about the precise mechanism (70). Given that IL-15 can directly initiate mTORC1 and mTORC2 activation, it is tempting to speculate that mTOR signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of NK cell development and function. Indeed, Yang et al. showed that in mTORC1-deficient Ncr1Cre x Raptorflox mice, NK cell maturation was blocked at the CD27+ CD11b- NK stage in the BM while mTORC2-deficient Ncr1Cre x Rictorflox mice displayed an arrest at the DP NK stage (71). These results suggest that both complexes are required for NK cell maturation yet in a non-redundant manner. Mechanistically, mTORC1 induces Eomes expression while mTORC2 inhibits Forkhead transcriptions factor of the O class-1 (FOXO1), a gene highly expressed in iNK and CD27+ CD11b- NK cells (71). FOXO1 is a negative regulator of NK cell development (72) thus by suppressing FOXO1 expression, mTORC2 promotes terminal differentiation of NK cells.

Interestingly, mTOR is a target of TGF-β, and the latter was shown to inhibit the functional activation of NK cells by repressing the mTOR pathway (73). In vitro treatment of murine and human NK cells with recombinant TGF-β abrogated IL-15-mediated activation of mTOR. In vivo constitutive TGF-β signaling and mTOR depletion both led to the arrest of NK cell development. Deletion of TGFβRII enhanced IL-15-driven mTOR activation and NK cell cytotoxicity. Activin A, a member of the TGF-β superfamily was also shown to induce phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 in mouse and human NK cells leading to the impairment of IL-15-mediated NK cell proliferation and granzyme B production (74). However, suppression of TGF-β signaling did not impact NK cell development (73). In 2018, Zaiatz-Bittencourt et al. also demonstrated that canonical TGF-β signaling pathway does repress human NK cell metabolism and functions (75). Yet, in their study, the repression of NK cell metabolic responses did not involve the inhibition of mTORC1 (75) in contrast to the results from Viel et al. (73).

NK cell effector functions

NK cells are part of the first line in the host defense against intracellular pathogens and tumor cells. Their functional response is dependent on the integration of signals through either inhibitory or activating germline-encoded receptors. The Ly49 receptors in mice and their human equivalent killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) represent the major family of NK cell inhibitory receptors and recognize the MHC class I molecules expressed by healthy cells (76, 77). This protects the host against auto-reactivity. However, tumor cells or pathogen-infected cells lose MHC I molecules expression leading to less inhibition of NK cells. At the same time, NK cells are activated through stimulation of their activating receptors such as natural-killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) through binding to target cell-derived ligands (78).

Once activated and functional, NK cells can act via two distinct mechanisms: cytotoxic immune response and secretion of cytokines. The NK cell cytotoxic response itself comprises two processes. One of them consists in a direct action through the release of cytolytic granules. An immunological synapse (IS) is formed between the NK cell and its target cell followed by a reorganization of the cytoskeleton (79). The microtubule organizing center and the secretory lysosomes are polarized towards the IS (80). The secretory lysosomes then fuse with the plasma membrane of the target cell and the cytolytic molecules are released in the cytoplasm. There, the perforin polymerizes and forms pores at the membrane allowing the serine protease granzymes to enter (81). Granzymes trigger apoptosis in a caspase-dependent manner (82) or through proteolytic cleavage of pro-apoptotic protein Bid (83). The second process by which NK cell can kill target cells is indirect and mediated by the engagement of death receptors present at the surface of target cells such as TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-receptor (TRAIL-R) and Fas (CD95). NK cells express the corresponding ligands (TRAIL and FasL) which trigger caspase 3-dependent apoptosis of the target upon binding (84, 85).

Another mechanism in NK cell functional response is the secretion of cytokines and other inflammatory factors. Although activated NK cells can produce a vast variety of pro-inflammatory or immunosuppressive molecules, they primarily secrete Th1-type cytokines such as IFNγ, TNFα and granulocyte/monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). They can also produce chemokines such as CCL3 (MIP-1α), CCL4 (MIP-1β), CCL5 (RANTES), XCL1 (lympho-toxin), and CXCL8 (IL-8) (86, 87). The secretion of these factors directly contributes to the activation and recruitment of other immune cells (T cells, DCs, monocytes and macrophages…) to the site of inflammation (87). These same cells can also influence the NK cell cytokine production by secreting activating cytokines. For instance, DCs can produce IL-12, IL-15 and IL-18 all three being able to activate NK cells (88). IL-12 significantly enhances their production of IFNγ in a STAT4-dependent manner while IL-18 signaling promotes Ifng transcript expression through induction of AP-1 and p38 MAPK (89, 90).

Factors modulating NK cell maturation and functional response

NK cell terminal maturation is the key to obtaining differentiated effector cells with optimal antiviral and antitumor properties. The identification of factors modulating NK cell maturation and consequently their functional response has been at the center of many studies over the past few years.

Central regulation of NK cell development

Adenosine is an immunosuppressive metabolite generated in response to hypoxia or extracellular stress (91). It signals through 4 different receptors (A1, A2A, A2B and A3) and it was shown that signaling through A2AR prevents the infiltration of lymphocytes CD8+ T cells as well as NK cells (92, 93). In vitro culture of NK cells with adenosine and adenosine analogues leads to decreased cytotoxicity and cytokine production (94). However, Young et al. went further by studying the impact of A2AR signaling on NK cell maturation and anti-tumor response in vivo (95). They showed that NK cell-specific deletion of the A2AR signaling led to an accumulation of terminally mature CD11b+ mNK cells in the BM and accordingly decreased numbers of DP NK cells. The expression of maturation markers such as KLRG1 and Ly49C/I were also higher in CD11b+ mNK cells from Ncr1iCre x A2ARflox mice compared to littermate controls (Figure 2). They performed BM reconstitution with NK derived from Ncr1iCre x R26YFP and Ncr1iCre x A2ARflox mice at a 1:1 ratio into irradiated CD45.1+ recipients. After 14 weeks, A2AR-deficient NK cells displayed significantly greater reconstitution in central and peripheral organs (95). They also displayed a more mature KLRG1+ CD27- CD11b+ phenotype than their counterparts from Ncr1iCre R26YFP mice indicating a cell-intrinsic effect of adenosine signaling. Subcutaneous injections of SM1WT1 melanoma cells into Ncr1iCrexA2ARflox mice revealed reduced tumor growth and enhanced NK cell infiltration compared to littermate controls. The proportion of CD11b+ mNK cells was increased in the subcutaneous tumor while that of DP NK cells was decreased. Similar results were obtained in a model of MCA-induced fibrosarcoma. Lastly, Young et al. cultured human NK cells with IL-2 and A2AR inhibitor for 6 days which resulted in a decreased proportion of CD56bright NK cells (95). Since CD56brigh NK cells are thought to differentiate into CD56dim NK cells, these results suggest that adenosine could negatively regulates NK cell maturation and anti-tumor activity both in mice and humans.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Newly discovered factors modulating NK cell maturation and function. Intracellular osteopontin (iOPN) and YTHDF2 were shown to positively regulate NK cell maturation and functional response. iOPN deficiency resulted in the downregulation of T-bet and Eomes expression as well as in the impairment of NK cell cytolytic activity and cytokine secretion. YTHDF2 promotes NK cell maturation, proliferation, survival and effector functions through a STAT5-YTHDF2 positive feedback loop. On the other hand, adenosine signaling, IL1R8, TIPE2, Zhx2 and GSK3 were all shown to negatively regulate NK cell maturation and anti-tumor activity through downregulation of maturation markers and/or transcription factors, decreased IFNγ secretion and inhibition of diverse NK cell activating signaling pathways. Thus, these factors constitute promising targets for NK cell-based immunotherapies.

Osteopontin (OPN) previously known as Secreted phosphoprotein (Spp1) is a phosphorylated glycoprotein involved in homeostatic (biomineralization, wound healing, cell viability…) as well as pathological situations (cancer, inflammation, metabolic diseases…) (96). Two isoforms of OPN exist, one that is secreted (sOPN) and the other that remains intracellular (iOPN) as it lacks the N-terminal signal sequence (97). OPN is expressed in a large variety of tissues and by a substantial amount of cell types. It was shown that OPN skews the balance of BM lymphoid and myeloid population sizes (98). Notably, iOPN expression in myeloid progenitors tends to decrease their numbers and consequently that of mature myeloid cells by promoting apoptosis of the progenitors. On the other hand, BM-derived sOPN increases the differentiated lymphoid population size. Another study showed that Spp1 transcript expression starts in the first mature stage of BM NK cells and is increased along their development with a peak of expression at the DP stage (99). Using OPN-deficient (OPN KO) mice and iOPN-knock-in (iOPN KI) mice expressing only the intracellular isoform (but not the secreted one), they showed that iOPN participated to NK cell maturation. BM reconstitution experiments demonstrated an intrinsic NK cell effect. Sublethally irradiated Rag2−/−γC−/− hosts were injected with a mixture of NK cells from OPN KO and iOPN KI in CD45.1+ congenic mice. After 12 weeks, iOPN-sufficient NK cells displayed a twofold greater reconstitution than their OPN-deficient counterparts. Moreover, iOPN deficiency leads to the downregulation of T-bet and Eomes (Figure 2) as well as to an impairment of NK cell function with decreased cytolytic activity and cytokine secretion (99). However, these studies were performed mainly under homeostatic conditions. Given that OPN production is usually dysregulated in inflammatory contexts (100103), it could be interesting to investigate the impact that OPN might have on NK cell maturation and functional response in such cases.

Peripheral regulation of NK cell functional maturation

In the periphery, the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) reader YTHDF2 was shown to positively regulate NK cell maturation, proliferation, survival and effector functions via a STAT5-YTHDF2 positive feedback loop (104). m6A is a common posttranscriptional modification on mRNA and is involved in a variety of biological contexts (105). YTHDF2 binds to methylated RNA and can promote translation as well as regulation of its stability (106). Using Ncr1iCrexYthdf2flox mice, Ma et al. demonstrated that YTHDF2 is highly expressed in NK cells and specific deletion of Ythdf2 in NK cells leads to an impairment of their antitumor and antiviral activities. Intravenous injection of B16F10 tumor cells in Ncr1iCrexYthdf2flox mice revealed a significant reduction in infiltrating YTHDF2-deficient NK cells compared to their WT counterparts accompanied by a decreased expression of IFNγ, Granzyme B and perforin. Next, infections with MCMV showed that YTHDF2-deficient mice displayed decreased numbers of Ly49H+/Ly49D+ NK cells (104). This resulted in heavier viral loads suggesting that YTHDF2 is involved in Ly49-mediated NK cell response against MCMV. Besides its impact on NK cell functions, YTHDF2 is upregulated along the maturation process of NK cells with terminally differentiated CD27-CD11b+ mNK cells expressing it at the highest level. At steady state in periphery, Ncr1iCrexYthdf2flox mice display an increase in DP NK cells and subsequent drop in CD27-CD11b+ mNK cell numbers compared to their littermate controls. Consistent with these findings, expression levels of KLRG1 on YTHDF2-deficient CD11b+ mNK cells were significantly lower. BM reconstitution experiments revealed a reduction in the proportion of CD11b+ mNK cells derived from BM YTHDF2-deficient cells with decreased Eomes expression at both mRNA and protein levels. Thus, YTHDF2 potentially promotes NK cell terminal maturation by regulating Eomes. Lastly, using Ncr1iCrexStat5flox mice, they demonstrated that YTHDF2 is downstream of IL-15/STAT5 signaling while STAT5 phosphorylation is partially inhibited in Ncr1iCrexYthdf2flox mice suggesting that YTHDF2 is required for optimum STAT5 activation (Figure 2) (104). Thus, this study revealed the existence of a new positive NK cell maturation regulator although it could be of interest to translate these results to human NK cells.

However, most studies have highlighted negative regulators of NK cell functional maturation and are proposing them as targets for enhancing NK cell-mediated tumor surveillance. IL-1R8 is part of the IL-1 receptor family and is known to negatively control immune responses and T cell functions (107). Human NK cells express high levels of IL-1R8 at the mRNA and protein levels and the latter increase along the developmental pathway. In mice, Il1R8 transcript expression rise particularly during the maturation process, from CD27+CD11b- to CD27-CD11b+ mNK cell stages (108). Using IL-1R8 KO mice, Molgora et al. found increased numbers of circulating, liver and splenic NK cells compared to WT mice (108). In the BM, the frequency of terminally differentiated KLRG1+ mNK cells were higher suggesting greater in situ maturation even if homing of peripheral activated NK cells could not be excluded. The frequency of NK progenitors on the other hand remained unchanged indicating that IL-1R8 is not required for early development of NK cells. Using different models of cancer as well as MCMV infection, they were able to demonstrate that IL-1R8 deficiency in NK cells was associated with enhanced antitumor and antiviral activities. Expression of activating receptors (NKG2D, CD226, Ly49H) were increased in peripheral blood NK cells from Il1R8-/- mice. IFNγ and Granzyme B secretion were more sustained in from Il1R8-/- splenic NK cells upon ex vivo stimulation with IL-18. Culture of healthy donor-derived human NK cells with a combination of IL-12 and IL-18 revealed an inverse correlation between IL-1R8 expression and levels of secreted IFNγ (Figure 2). Partial silencing of Il1R8 with small interfering RNA led to an increased IFNγ production in IL-1R8-deficient human NK cells (108). Thus, IL-1R8 is a negative regulator of NK cell maturation and effector functions in mice and humans although the impact of IL-1R8 on human NK cell development in the BM was not assessed.

In another study by Bi et al., TNF-α–induced protein-8 like-2 (TIPE2), a known apoptosis regulator, is shown to suppress NK cell maturation and antitumor activity (109). TIPE2 expression correlates with mouse and human NK cell maturation process and NK-specific TIPE2 deficiency in Ncr1iCrexTipe2flox mice resulted in increased CD27-CD11b+ NK cell numbers in central and peripheral organs and accompanied by an increase in KLRG1 expression on splenic NK cells. BM chimera experiments indicated that TIPE2 intrinsically inhibits NK cell maturation. In in vitro cytotoxic assays, TIPE2-overexpressing human NK cell lines showed decreased cytolytic activity while PMA/ionomycin-stimulated TIPE2-deficient murine NK cells displayed higher levels of CD69, IFNγ and CD107a demonstrating that TIPE2 suppresses NK cell activation and cytolytic activity in both mice and humans (109). Moreover, NK cells from Ncr1iCrexTipe2flox mice proliferate more in response to IL-15 suggesting an enhanced IL-15 signaling in the absence of TIPE2. Mechanistically, this can be explained by the fact that TIPE2 inhibits IL-15 mediated mTOR activation (Figure 2) as in vitro culture of NK cells in presence of mTOR inhibitor rapamycin abrogates the enhanced proliferation and activation of TIPE2-deficient NK cells as well as the inhibitory effect of TIPE2 overexpression. Lastly, intravenous injections of diverse tumor cell types in Ncr1iCrexTipe2flox mice show decreased tumor growth and higher numbers of NK cells suggesting that TIPE2 inhibits NK cell antitumor immunity.

Using similar techniques and approaches, Tan et al. showed that transcription factor Zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 (Zhx2) negatively modulates NK cell maturation and antitumor response (110). Indeed, Ncr1iCrexZhx2flox mice display an accumulation of CD27-CD11b+ KLRG1+ NK cells in the BM, spleen, liver and blood in comparison to Ncr1iCrexZhx2WT mice indicating a more mature phenotype. Mixed BM chimera experiments were performed by transfer of CD45.2+ Zhx2-deficient cells and CD45.1+ Zhx2-sufficient cells at 1:1 ratio in irradiated CD45.1+CD45.2+ hosts. Splenic NK cell chimerism was assessed 8 weeks after injection and revealed increased number of NK cells derived from Zhx2-deficient cells indicating that the role of Zhx2 is cell intrinsic. Effector functions (IFNγ, TNFα, granzyme B, CD107a) and cytolytic activity are enhanced in Ncr1iCrexZhx2flox mice compared to their WT counterparts (110). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis using RNA-seq data of splenic NK cells from Ncr1iCrexZhx2flox and their littermate control mice revealed an enrichment for IL-15 signaling-associated genes in Zhx2-deficient NK cells. More specifically, they showed that IL-15 stimulated NK cells from Ncr1iCrexZhx2flox mice display increased levels of phosphorylated STAT5 and AKT suggesting that Zhx2 regulates NK cell response to IL-15 through the activation of these downstream signaling pathways (Figure 2). Moreover, transcriptomic analyses led to the identification of Zeb2 as direct target of Zhx2. Transcription factor Zeb2 was reported to be essential for terminal maturation of NK cells as well as survival of CD27-CD11b+ mNK cells (111) thus supporting the idea that Zhx2 restricts NK cell maturation by repressing Zeb2 expression. Lastly, using an orthotopic model of HCC, Tan et al. showed that Ncr1iCrexZhx2flox mice displayed higher levels of tumor infiltrating mNK cells with enhanced CD107a expression compared to control mice suggesting a better control of tumor growth by Zhx2-deficient NK cells.

In a study from 2017, Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) 3, a constitutively active serine-threonine kinase, was reported to restrict NK cell maturation and antitumor activity (112). GSK3 can impact gene expression either by directly targeting transcription factor or by phosphorylating histones (113). Cochocki et al. isolated NK cells from peripheral blood of healthy MCMV seropositive donors and cultured them for 7 days with IL-15, with or without GSK3 selective inhibitor CHIR99021. Overall expansion of cells was similar despite increased proportion of CD57+NKG2C+ NK cells in the CHIR99021 condition compared to the control. The glycan carbohydrate CD57 molecule is expressed at the surface of terminally differentiated NK cells and CD57+NKG2C+ NK cells are considered as mouse Ly49H+ NK cell counterparts and referred to “adaptive” NK cells (114). The upregulation of CD57 was accompanied by that of Tbx21 (Figure 2) and its two targets Zeb2 and Prdm1 both at the mRNA and protein levels (112) demonstrating an increased maturation of ex vivo expanded NK cells when GSK3 is inhibited. Eomes expression on the other hand was not impacted. In addition, cultures of NK cells with CHIR99021 displayed higher levels of IFNγ and TNFα as well as enhanced cytolytic activity towards several solid tumor cell lines. Lastly, Cochocki et al. injected luciferase-expressing SKOV-3 tumor cells in NSG mice before transferring NK cells primed overnight with IL-15 +/- CHIR99021. Tumor growth was followed over the course of 40 days via imaging of luciferase-positive cells. Mice that received IL-15 after priming of NK cells with CHIR99021, displayed better tumor control demonstrating that inhibition of GSK3 promotes NK cell antitumor activity after adoptive transfer. Although not discussed in the study, it is interesting to note that GSK3 is inhibited by AKT which is itself downstream of the IL-15/PI (3)K pathway (115). This further supports the fact that GSK3 inhibition contributes to enhancing IL-15 signaling and consequently NK cell functional maturation.

Altogether, these studies have uncovered new immune checkpoints in NK cell maturation and antitumor response in both mice and humans offering promising targets for NK cell-based immunotherapies.

Impact of inflammation and therapy on NK cell development and maturation

Hematopoiesis is a tightly regulated process. However, the latter can be affected in a variety of inflammatory contexts. In the case of NK cells, due to their importance in diseases such as cancer and viral infections, it remains essential to uncover the impact the inflammation itself could have on their development, maturation and effector functions.

Obesity

Obesity rates have skyrocketed worldwide for the past decades, especially in western countries. The unbalanced diets are now responsible for a high prevalence in the adult population, almost reaching 40% in the United States of America. Obesity predisposes individuals to metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes but also to infectious diseases (116). This can be accounted for by the fact that being overweight can compromises one’s immunity and dysregulates the immune system (117). Indeed, NK cells are known to be dysregulated in obesity both in mice and humans (118, 119). More specifically, Michelet et al. showed how obesity is responsible for a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-driven lipid accumulation in NK cells which inhibits mTOR-mediated glycolysis and leads to defective cytotoxicity (120) (Figure 3). Using mouse models of diet-induced obesity, they performed transcriptional analysis on NK cells which unveiled the upregulation of lipid metabolism-related genes and the downregulation of genes involved in the cytotoxic response and the mTOR signaling pathway. The same pathways were altered in NK cells from obese humans. In vitro culture of human NK cells with free fatty acids (FFAs) revealed that the more NK cells accumulated lipid droplets the less they expressed perforin and granzyme B (Figure 3). This demonstrates a direct causality between lipid uptake and decreased cytolytic activity in NK cells. In accordance with these findings, lipid-treated NK cells failed to control tumor growth in vivo in a B16F10 melanoma model (120). In addition, they showed that NK cells isolated from obese patients displayed a significantly diminished mTORC1 activation after cytokine stimulation as revealed by lower levels of the phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein, a target of mTORC1 (120). Although not discussed in the study, it is interesting to note that circulating leptin levels are increased during obesity alongside with the development of a leptin resistance. Leptin is a peptide hormone produced by adipocytes which regulates body weight via a negative feedback loop between the hypothalamus and the adipose tissue (121) and was shown to activate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway (122). Since this activation is sensitive to rapamycin, leptin most likely activates mTOR via the mTORC1. Thus, we can hypothesize that impaired leptin signaling in obesity and more specifically in NK cells might contribute to the dysregulation of the mTOR pathway. Moreover, given that mTOR is essential for IL-15 signaling and consequently for NK cell development and activation (123), it can be assumed that obesity not only affects NK cell cytotoxic functions and antitumor activity but may also impact NK cell development and maturation. Examining NK cell development and maturation as well as measuring leptin levels in the BM of obese mice and patients would help answer that pending question.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Impact of diverse inflammatory contexts on NK cell maturation and functional response. In obesity, circulating NK cells accumulate lipid droplets through a PPAR-driven mechanism. This directly promotes an inhibition of mTOR-mediated glycolysis as well as decreased cytotoxic capacity. In breast cancer therapy, mTOR inhibitor everolimus is commonly used and induces changes in NK cells. Treated patients display reduced numbers of CD56dim mNK cells but the remaining cells exhibit preserved cytokine secretion along with enhanced target cell killing. In graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) following allogeneic BM transplantation (Allo-BMT), donor T cells compete with NK cells for IL-15 resulting in a compromised NK cell reconstitution. Administration of exogenous IL-15 or rapamycin helps restore NK cell development. In hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation promotes expansion of mature CD56dimNKG2C+KIR+NKG2A- NK cells. HCMV reactivation also correlates with decreased risk of leukemia relapse which could be linked to the functional status of NK cells.

Cancer therapy

Cancer is the second cause of mortality worldwide accounting for almost 10 million deaths in 2018 according to the World Health Organization. In women, breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer in terms of incidence and each year millions of BCs are diagnosed (124). Besson et al. studied the impact that mTORC1 inhibition in metastatic BC has on NK cell maturation, numbers and functions (125). Cancer cells usually display an enhanced activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway to sustain their metabolic needs. Moreover, mTOR expression is associated with poor prognostic in BC patients (126). Therefore, everolimus an analog of rapamycin is frequently used in resistant forms of BC. Given that mTOR is required for NK cell development and activation (71, 123), everolimus might have a detrimental effect on NK cell antitumoral response. To answer that question, they analysed blood samples from metastatic BC patients before beginning the treatment (baseline), 1 and 3 months after (M1 and M3). By measuring the levels of phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 and AKT, respectively downstream of mTORC1 and mTORC2, they were able to conclude that everolimus leads to a specific inhibition of mTORC1 and does not affect mTORC2. Circulating NK cell numbers were gradually decreased from baseline to M3, with a restricted reduction of CD56dim NK cells while numbers of CD56bright NK cells remained unchanged, suggesting a possible default of maturation (Figure 3). Consistent with this hypothesis, expression levels of maturation-associated markers CD57, KLRG1, CD16, 2B4 and CD161 were downregulated. Interestingly, NK cells isolated at M3 displayed preserved cytokine secretion ability and even an increased target cell killing in a cytotoxicity array (125) (Figure 3). These results contrast with those obtained in mouse models where mTOR activity was positively linked to NK cell cytokine secretion and cytotoxic response (120, 127). The discrepancies could be explained by differences between the two species, an indirect effect of everolimus or from the pathological context of BC. Thus, even though inhibition of mTORC1 leads to a defect in mature NK cells, it could be beneficial to cytolytic functions of the remaining cells, a possible notion which challenges previous findings in other models.

GVHD

Allogeneic BM transplantation (allo-BMT) is a curative therapy used to replace stem cells that were destroyed during irradiation or chemotherapy. It consists in a donor giving BM cells to a recipient (128). However, allo-BMT is associated with several complications such as opportunistic infections or graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). GVHD is a common condition after allo-BMT, occurring in 50% to 70% of patients, and is caused by donated BM cells recognizing the recipient’s body cells as foreign and thus attacking them (129, 130). It is mostly mediated by donor T cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Given that NK cells harbor both antiviral and antitumor activities, they are highly effective for fighting leukemia and/or CMV reactivation in transplanted patients. Yet, Bunting et al. showed how donor T cells in GVHD prevent proper NK cell reconstitution and thus compromise NK cell immunity (131). Using B6-background strains of mice, they created a BM transplant model with GVHD targeting both MHC class I and II. A significant impaired reconstitution of NK cells in the BM and an even stronger defect in NK cells in periphery (spleen, liver, lung, lymph nodes) were observed in mice with GVHD (allogeneic transplant) compared to non-GVHD mice (syngeneic transplant) (Figure 3). Increased apoptosis in the early phase of GVHD partially explained the diminished splenic NK pool as revealed by Annexin V staining experiments. In the BM, the decrease in NK cell numbers started at the CD27+ NK stage suggesting a default in the maturation process. In order to determine whether donor T cells were responsible for NK cell decreased numbers, Bunting et al. used T cell-depleted grafts and compared them to T cell-repleted ones. In T cell-depleted grafts, higher numbers of NK cells were observed regardless of the presence of GVHD suggesting a competition between donor T cells and NK cells for expansion (131). IL-15 is essential for NK cell maturation, survival and proliferation but is also required for CD8+ T cell homeostasis. Indeed, levels of IL-15/IL-15Rα complex were significantly lower in T cell-repleted grafts compared to T cell-depleted ones. Transplantation with BM cells with IL-15Rα-/- T cells resulted in an enhanced NK cell reconstitution. Administration of exogenous IL-15/IL-15Rα complex in GVHD-affected mice led to increased NK cell numbers compared to non-treated mice (Figure 3). Altogether, these results point towards a competition between T cells and NK cells for IL-15 consumption thereby limiting the expansion of the latter. Interestingly, use of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin led to a similar result as IL-15/IL-15Rα injections although mTOR was shown to be essential for IL-15 signaling-mediated NK cell development and activation (71, 123). This is likely due to the fact that rapamycin primarily restricts donor T cell activation which counterbalances its own negative effects on NK cells. Lastly, the defect in NK cells induced by GVHD resulted in the failure of NK cells to control CMV infection as well as tumor cells in an acute myeloid leukemia model. Thus, this study highlights the effect of GVHD on NK cell maturation and functional response and proposes solutions with IL-15 and rapamycin administration.

Viral infection

Human CMV (HCMV) is a very common herpesvirus, infecting between 50% and 100% of individuals depending on the geographical location and socioeconomic factors (132). Most people remain infected for life with occasional reactivations especially in immunosuppressed or immunodeficient patients (133). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are thus particularly at risk. NK cells are usually the first lymphocytes to reconstitute after transplantation and play a crucial role in the control of the HCMV. In murine CMV infection, a population of Ly49H+ NK cells was shown to expand and display “memory-like” properties (134). In humans, expansion of NK cells expressing high levels of the activating receptor CD94/NKG2C specific for non-classical HLA-E was observed in patients infected with HCMV (135, 136). These expanded NK cells exhibit a mature CD56dimNKG2C+KIR+NKG2A-phenotype (Figure 3). Thus, several studies took an interest in how HCMV reactivation could impact NK cell reconstitution in HSCT recipients (137, 138). Using patients having received umbilical cord blood transplantations, they analysed NK cell development up to 12 months after transplant. NK cells were the first lymphocyte population to be detected in peripheral blood however NK cells from patients with HCMV reactivation expressed a mature phenotype while other patients harbored a majority of immature NK cells (137). These persisting NKG2C+ NK cells preferentially upregulated CD57 and expressed higher levels of IFNγ, IL-15Rα and T-bet mRNA transcripts compared to patients without HCMV reactivation (138). Lastly, Elmaagacli et al. reported that HCMV reactivation in HSCT recipients correlated with a decreased risk of leukemia relapse (Figure 3) (139) supporting the idea that HCMV reactivation might actually be beneficial for shaping full mature and functional NK cells protecting the host.

Altogether, these studies constitute novel approaches in the study field on NK cell maturation (Figure 4). More studies are necessary to uncover how inflammatory contexts dysregulate NK cell development, especially in the BM, and the consequences this has on their functional response in pathology.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Inflammatory-driven regulation of NK cell functional maturation. The family of common γc cytokines is known to be involved in NK cell development and functional activation. IL-15 is the main cytokine driving proliferation, differentiation, survival and functional maturation and can act on all stages of murine and human CD122+ NK progenitors and precursors. IL-2 and IL-21 can synergize and promote survival of mouse and human NK cells as well as enhance their cytotoxic activity. IL-12 and IL-18 also synergize to activate NK cells and amplify their expansion and production of IFNγ (140). Everolimus, free fatty acids (FFAs) in obsesity and TGF-β were shown to inhibit the IL-15-mediated activation of the mTOR pathway. GVHD, A2AR, IL1R8, TIPE2, ZHX2 and GSK3 were discovered as newly factors and pathological context negatively regulating NK cell functional maturation while osteopontin, YTHDF2 and HCMV reactivation after HSCT promote it. Framed factors and inflammatory contexts were validated in human NK cells.

Conclusion

Understanding what mechanisms are at play in the regulation of NK cell development and maturation will help design new therapeutic approaches using these cells. Yet, too few studies have focused on the impact inflammation itself has on NK cell development and maturation. In a Lewis lung cancer model, tumor progression was positively correlated with infiltration of CD27-CD11b- NK cells suggesting that the tumor microenvironment locally regulates NK cell maturation process (141). In other primary and metastatic cancer settings, TGF-β was shown to be upregulated and to drive conversion of effector NK cells into ILC1-like cells (142) highlighting their potential of inflammation-mediated plasticity. Another crucial feature of NK cells is their ability to mobilize both innate and antigen-specific immune responses. It would be interesting to determine whether “memory-like” NK cells undergo different steps of maturation. Thus, the study of NK cell development and maturation under inflammation remains open and requires further investigation.

Author contributions

EB designed and prepared the manuscript and the figures. RG gave guidance on the outline and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work has been supported by Institut Pasteur, University of Paris Cité, Institut National de la santé et de la recherche Médicale (INSERM) and by grants from INSERM by the French Government (National Research Agency, ANR), ANR project NASHILCCD8 (#18-CE15-0024-01). E.B. is funded by La Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Guillerey C. NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol (2020) 1273:69–90. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49270-0_4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Spits H, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, et al. Innate lymphoid cells–a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:145–9. doi: 10.1038/nri3365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Vivier E, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, et al. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell (2018) 174:1054–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sojka DK, Tian Z, Yokoyama WM. Tissue-resident natural killer cells and their potential diversity. Semin Immunol (2014) 26:127–31. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Colucci F, Caligiuri MA, Di Santo JP. What does it take to make a natural killer? Nat Rev Immunol (2003) 3:413–25. doi: 10.1038/nri1088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kondo M, Weissman IL, Akashi K. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Cell (1997) 91:661–72. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80453-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Fathman JW, Bhattacharya D, Inlay MA, Seita J, Karsunky H, Weissman IL. Identification of the earliest natural killer cell-committed progenitor in murine bone marrow. Blood (2011) 118:5439–47. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Carotta S, Pang SHM, Nutt SL, Belz GT. Identification of the earliest NK-cell precursor in the mouse BM. Blood (2011) 117:5449–52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-318956

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rosmaraki EE, Douagi I, Roth C, Colucci F, Cumano A, Di Santo JP. Identification of committed NK cell progenitors in adult murine bone marrow. Eur J Immunol (2001) 31:1900–9. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200106)31:6<1900::aid-immu1900>3.0.co;2-m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Goh W, Huntington ND. Regulation of murine natural killer cell development. Front Immunol (2017) 8:130. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Abel AM, Yang C, Thakar MS, Malarkannan S. Natural killer cells: Development, maturation, and clinical utilization. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1869. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Takeda K, Oshima H, Hayakawa Y, Akiba H, Atsuta M, Kobata T, et al. CD27-mediated activation of murine NK cells. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2000) 164:1741–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1741

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Takeda K, Cretney E, Hayakawa Y, Ota T, Akiba H, Ogasawara K, et al. TRAIL identifies immature natural killer cells in newborn mice and adult mouse liver. Blood (2005) 105:2082–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kim S, Iizuka K, Kang H-SP, Dokun A, French AR, Greco S, et al. In vivo developmental stages in murine natural killer cell maturation. Nat Immunol (2002) 3:523–8. doi: 10.1038/ni796

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Chiossone L, Chaix J, Fuseri N, Roth C, Vivier E, Walzer T. Maturation of mouse NK cells is a 4-stage developmental program. Blood (2009) 113:5488–96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hayakawa Y, Smyth MJ. CD27 dissects mature NK cells into two subsets with distinct responsiveness and migratory capacity. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2006) 176:1517–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1517

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huntington ND, Tabarias H, Fairfax K, Brady J, Hayakawa Y, Degli-Esposti MA, et al. NK cell maturation and peripheral homeostasis is associated with KLRG1 up-regulation. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2007) 178:4764–70. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4764

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Constantinides MG, McDonald BD, Verhoef PA, Bendelac A. A committed precursor to innate lymphoid cells. Nature (2014) 508:397–401. doi: 10.1038/nature13047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Klose CSN, Flach M, Möhle L, Rogell L, Hoyler T, Ebert K, et al. Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell (2014) 157:340–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Xu W, Cherrier DE, Chea S, Vosshenrich C, Serafini N, Petit M, et al. An Id2RFP-reporter mouse redefines innate lymphoid cell precursor potentials. Immunity (2019) 50:1054–1068.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.02.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Xu L, Cao Y, Xie Z, Huang Q, Bai Q, Yang X, et al. The transcription factor TCF-1 initiates the differentiation of T(FH) cells during acute viral infection. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:991–9. doi: 10.1038/ni.3229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Constantinides MG, Gudjonson H, McDonald BD, Ishizuka IE, Verhoef PA, Dinner AR, et al. PLZF expression maps the early stages of ILC1 lineage development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2015) 112:5123–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423244112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Friedrich C, Taggenbrock RLRE, Doucet-Ladevèze R, Golda G, Moenius R, Arampatzi P, et al. Effector differentiation downstream of lineage commitment in ILC1s is driven by hobit across tissues. Nat Immunol (2021) 22:1256–67. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01013-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bai L, Vienne M, Tang L, Kerdiles Y, Etiennot M, Escalière B, et al. Liver type 1 innate lymphoid cells develop locally via an interferon-γ-dependent loop. Science (2021) 371:eaba4177. doi: 10.1126/science.aba4177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Renoux VM, Zriwil A, Peitzsch C, Michaëlsson J, Friberg D, Soneji S, et al. Identification of a human natural killer cell lineage-restricted progenitor in fetal and adult tissues. Immunity (2015) 43:394–407. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang D, Malarkannan S. Transcriptional regulation of natural killer cell development and functions. Cancers (2020) 12:E1591. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061591

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mace EM, Hsu AP, Monaco-Shawver L, Makedonas G, Rosen JB, Dropulic L, et al. Mutations in GATA2 cause human NK cell deficiency with specific loss of the CD56(bright) subset. Blood (2013) 121:2669–77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-453969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Jacobs R, Hintzen G, Kemper A, Beul K, Kempf S, Behrens G, et al. CD56bright cells differ in their KIR repertoire and cytotoxic features from CD56dim NK cells. Eur J Immunol (2001) 31:3121–7. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2001010)31:10<3121::aid-immu3121>3.0.co;2-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Wagner JA, Rosario M, Romee R, Berrien-Elliott MM, Schneider SE, Leong JW, et al. CD56bright NK cells exhibit potent antitumor responses following IL-15 priming. J Clin Invest (2017) 127:4042–58. doi: 10.1172/JCI90387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Juelke K, Killig M, Luetke-Eversloh M, Parente E, Gruen J, Morandi B, et al. CD62L expression identifies a unique subset of polyfunctional CD56dim NK cells. Blood (2010) 116:1299–307. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Vosshenrich CAJ, García-Ojeda ME, Samson-Villéger SI, Pasqualetto V, Enault L, Richard-Le Goff O, et al. A thymic pathway of mouse natural killer cell development characterized by expression of GATA-3 and CD127. Nat Immunol (2006) 7:1217–24. doi: 10.1038/ni1395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Huntington ND, Vosshenrich CAJ, Di Santo JP. Developmental pathways that generate natural-killer-cell diversity in mice and humans. Nat Rev Immunol (2007) 7:703–14. doi: 10.1038/nri2154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Boulanger MJ, Garcia KC. Shared cytokine signaling receptors: structural insights from the gp130 system. Adv Protein Chem (2004) 68:107–46. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(04)68004-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Meazza R, Azzarone B, Orengo AM, Ferrini S. Role of common-gamma chain cytokines in NK cell development and function: perspectives for immunotherapy. J BioMed Biotechnol (2011) 2011:861920. doi: 10.1155/2011/861920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. He YW, Malek TR. Interleukin-7 receptor alpha is essential for the development of gamma delta + T cells, but not natural killer cells. J Exp Med (1996) 184:289–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.1.289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Moore TA, von Freeden-Jeffry U, Murray R, Zlotnik A. Inhibition of gamma delta T cell development and early thymocyte maturation in IL-7 -/- mice. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (1996) 157:2366–73.

Google Scholar

37. Matsuda M, Ono R, Iyoda T, Endo T, Iwasaki M, Tomizawa-Murasawa M, et al. Human NK cell development in hIL-7 and hIL-15 knockin NOD/SCID/IL2rgKO mice. Life Sci Alliance (2019) 2:e201800195. doi: 10.26508/lsa.201800195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Michaud A, Dardari R, Charrier E, Cordeiro P, Herblot S, Duval M. IL-7 enhances survival of human CD56bright NK cells. J Immunother Hagerstown Md 1997 (2010) 33:382–90. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181cd872d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Taguchi Y, Kondo T, Watanabe M, Miyaji M, Umehara H, Kozutsumi Y, et al. Interleukin-2-induced survival of natural killer (NK) cells involving phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-dependent reduction of ceramide through acid sphingomyelinase, sphingomyelin synthase, and glucosylceramide synthase. Blood (2004) 104:3285–93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kündig TM, Schorle H, Bachmann MF, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM, Horak I. Immune responses in interleukin-2-deficient mice. Science (1993) 262:1059–61. doi: 10.1126/science.8235625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Gilmour KC, Fujii H, Cranston T, Davies EG, Kinnon C, Gaspar HB. Defective expression of the interleukin-2/interleukin-15 receptor beta subunit leads to a natural killer cell-deficient form of severe combined immunodeficiency. Blood (2001) 98:877–9. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.877

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kennedy MK, Glaccum M, Brown SN, Butz EA, Viney JL, Embers M, et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med (2000) 191:771–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.5.771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lodolce JP, Boone DL, Chai S, Swain RE, Dassopoulos T, Trettin S, et al. IL-15 receptor maintains lymphoid homeostasis by supporting lymphocyte homing and proliferation. Immunity (1998) 9:669–76. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80664-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Fehniger TA, Suzuki K, Ponnappan A, VanDeusen JB, Cooper MA, Florea SM, et al. Fatal leukemia in interleukin 15 transgenic mice follows early expansions in natural killer and memory phenotype CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med (2001) 193:219–31. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.2.219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Huntington ND, Legrand N, Alves NL, Jaron B, Weijer K, Plet A, et al. IL-15 trans-presentation promotes human NK cell development and differentiation in vivo. J Exp Med (2009) 206:25–34. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Fernandez IZ, Baxter RM, Garcia-Perez JE, Vendrame E, Ranganath T, Kong DS, et al. A novel human IL2RB mutation results in T and NK cell-driven immune dysregulation. J Exp Med (2019) 216:1255–67. doi: 10.1084/jem.20182015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Schluns KS, Nowak EC, Cabrera-Hernandez A, Puddington L, Lefrançois L, Aguila HL. Distinct cell types control lymphoid subset development by means of IL-15 and IL-15 receptor alpha expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2004) 101:5616–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307442101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Dubois S, Mariner J, Waldmann TA, Tagaya Y. IL-15Ralpha recycles and presents IL-15 in trans to neighboring cells. Immunity (2002) 17:537–47. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00429-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sandau MM, Schluns KS, Lefrancois L, Jameson SC. Cutting edge: transpresentation of IL-15 by bone marrow-derived cells necessitates expression of IL-15 and IL-15R alpha by the same cells. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2004) 173:6537–41. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6537

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Koka R, Burkett PR, Chien M, Chai S, Chan F, Lodolce JP, et al. Interleukin (IL)-15R[alpha]-deficient natural killer cells survive in normal but not IL-15R[alpha]-deficient mice. J Exp Med (2003) 197:977–84. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Carson WE, Giri JG, Lindemann MJ, Linett ML, Ahdieh M, Paxton R, et al. Interleukin (IL) 15 is a novel cytokine that activates human natural killer cells via components of the IL-2 receptor. J Exp Med (1994) 180:1395–403. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.4.1395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Carson WE, Fehniger TA, Haldar S, Eckhert K, Lindemann MJ, Lai CF, et al. A potential role for interleukin-15 in the regulation of human natural killer cell survival. J Clin Invest (1997) 99:937–43. doi: 10.1172/JCI119258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Skak K, Frederiksen KS, Lundsgaard D. Interleukin-21 activates human natural killer cells and modulates their surface receptor expression. Immunology (2008) 123:575–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02730.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ojo EO, Sharma AA, Liu R, Moreton S, Checkley-Luttge M-A, Gupta K, et al. Membrane bound IL-21 based NK cell feeder cells drive robust expansion and metabolic activation of NK cells. Sci Rep (2019) 9:14916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51287-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Gascoyne DM, Long E, Veiga-Fernandes H, de Boer J, Williams O, Seddon B, et al. The basic leucine zipper transcription factor E4BP4 is essential for natural killer cell development. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:1118–24. doi: 10.1038/ni.1787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Kamizono S, Duncan GS, Seidel MG, Morimoto A, Hamada K, Grosveld G, et al. Nfil3/E4bp4 is required for the development and maturation of NK cells in vivo. J Exp Med (2009) 206:2977–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Firth MA, Madera S, Beaulieu AM, Gasteiger G, Castillo EF, Schluns KS, et al. Nfil3-independent lineage maintenance and antiviral response of natural killer cells. J Exp Med (2013) 210:2981–90. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Male V, Nisoli I, Kostrzewski T, Allan DSJ, Carlyle JR, Lord GM, et al. The transcription factor E4bp4/Nfil3 controls commitment to the NK lineage and directly regulates eomes and Id2 expression. J Exp Med (2014) 211:635–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Park SY, Saijo K, Takahashi T, Osawa M, Arase H, Hirayama N, et al. Developmental defects of lymphoid cells in Jak3 kinase-deficient mice. Immunity (1995) 3:771–82. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90066-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Imada K, Bloom ET, Nakajima H, Horvath-Arcidiacono JA, Udy GB, Davey HW, et al. Stat5b is essential for natural killer cell-mediated proliferation and cytolytic activity. J Exp Med (1998) 188:2067–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.11.2067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Eckelhart E, Warsch W, Zebedin E, Simma O, Stoiber D, Kolbe T, et al. A novel Ncr1-cre mouse reveals the essential role of STAT5 for NK-cell survival and development. Blood (2011) 117:1565–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-291633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Townsend MJ, Weinmann AS, Matsuda JL, Salomon R, Farnham PJ, Biron CA, et al. T-Bet regulates the terminal maturation and homeostasis of NK and Valpha14i NKT cells. Immunity (2004) 20:477–94. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00076-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Jenne CN, Enders A, Rivera R, Watson SR, Bankovich AJ, Pereira JP, et al. T-Bet-dependent S1P5 expression in NK cells promotes egress from lymph nodes and bone marrow. J Exp Med (2009) 206:2469–81. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Walzer T, Chiossone L, Chaix J, Calver A, Carozzo C, Garrigue-Antar L, et al. Natural killer cell trafficking in vivo requires a dedicated sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor. Nat Immunol (2007) 8:1337–44. doi: 10.1038/ni1523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Pikovskaya O, Chaix J, Rothman NJ, Collins A, Chen Y-H, Scipioni AM, et al. Cutting edge: Eomesodermin is sufficient to direct type 1 innate lymphocyte development into the conventional NK lineage. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2016) 196:1449–54. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502396

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhang J, Le Gras S, Pouxvielh K, Faure F, Fallone L, Kern N, et al. Sequential actions of EOMES and T-BET promote stepwise maturation of natural killer cells. Nat Commun (2021) 12:5446. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25758-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Gordon SM, Chaix J, Rupp LJ, Wu J, Madera S, Sun JC, et al. The transcription factors T-bet and eomes control key checkpoints of natural killer cell maturation. Immunity (2012) 36:55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kallies A, Carotta S, Huntington ND, Bernard NJ, Tarlinton DM, Smyth MJ, et al. A role for Blimp1 in the transcriptional network controlling natural killer cell maturation. Blood (2011) 117:1869–79. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Smith MA, Maurin M, Cho HI, Becknell B, Freud AG, Yu J, et al. PRDM1/Blimp-1 controls effector cytokine production in human NK cells. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2010) 185:6058–67. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001682

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell (2017) 168:960–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Yang C, Tsaih S-W, Lemke A, Flister MJ, Thakar MS, Malarkannan S. mTORC1 and mTORC2 differentially promote natural killer cell development. eLife (2018) 7:e35619. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Deng Y, Kerdiles Y, Chu J, Yuan S, Wang Y, Chen X, et al. Transcription factor Foxo1 is a negative regulator of natural killer cell maturation and function. Immunity (2015) 42:457–70. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Viel S, Marçais A, Guimaraes FS-F, Loftus R, Rabilloud J, Grau M, et al. TGF-β inhibits the activation and functions of NK cells by repressing the mTOR pathway. Sci Signal (2016) 9:ra19. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aad1884

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Rautela J, Dagley LF, de Oliveira CC, Schuster IS, Hediyeh-Zadeh S, Delconte RB, et al. Therapeutic blockade of activin-a improves NK cell function and antitumor immunity. Sci Signal (2019) 12:eaat7527. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aat7527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zaiatz-Bittencourt V, Finlay DK, Gardiner CM. Canonical TGF-β signaling pathway represses human NK cell metabolism. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2018) 200:3934–41. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Dam J, Guan R, Natarajan K, Dimasi N, Chlewicki LK, Kranz DM, et al. Variable MHC class I engagement by Ly49 natural killer cell receptors demonstrated by the crystal structure of Ly49C bound to h-2K(b). Nat Immunol (2003) 4:1213–22. doi: 10.1038/ni1006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Rajalingam R. Overview of the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor system. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ (2012) 882:391–414. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-842-9_23

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Bauer S, Groh V, Wu J, Steinle A, Phillips JH, Lanier LL, et al. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science (1999) 285:727–9. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5428.727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Mace EM, Wu WW, Ho T, Mann SS, Hsu H-T, Orange JS. NK cell lytic granules are highly motile at the immunological synapse and require f-actin for post-degranulation persistence. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2012) 189:4870–80. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201296

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Stinchcombe JC, Majorovits E, Bossi G, Fuller S, Griffiths GM. Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse. Nature (2006) 443:462–5. doi: 10.1038/nature05071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Osińska I, Popko K, Demkow U. Perforin: an important player in immune response. Cent-Eur J Immunol (2014) 39:109–15. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2014.42135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Atkinson EA, Barry M, Darmon AJ, Shostak I, Turner PC, Moyer RW, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-assisted suicide. caspase 3 activation is primarily the result of the direct action of granzyme b. J Biol Chem (1998) 273:21261–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Barry M, Heibein JA, Pinkoski MJ, Lee SF, Moyer RW, Green DR, et al. Granzyme b short-circuits the need for caspase 8 activity during granule-mediated cytotoxic T-lymphocyte killing by directly cleaving bid. Mol Cell Biol (2000) 20:3781–94. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.11.3781-3794.2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Crowder RN, El-Deiry WS. Caspase-8 regulation of TRAIL-mediated cell death. Exp Oncol (2012) 34:160–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

85. Bao Q, Shi Y. Apoptosome: a platform for the activation of initiator caspases. Cell Death Differ (2007) 14:56–65. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Bluman EM, Bartynski KJ, Avalos BR, Caligiuri MA. Human natural killer cells produce abundant macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha in response to monocyte-derived cytokines. J Clin Invest (1996) 97:2722–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI118726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Roda JM, Parihar R, Magro C, Nuovo GJ, Tridandapani S, Carson WE. Natural killer cells produce T cell-recruiting chemokines in response to antibody-coated tumor cells. Cancer Res (2006) 66:517–26. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Moretta A. Natural killer cells and dendritic cells: rendezvous in abused tissues. Nat Rev Immunol (2002) 2:957–64. doi: 10.1038/nri956

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Mavropoulos A, Sully G, Cope AP, Clark AR. Stabilization of IFN-gamma mRNA by MAPK p38 in IL-12- and IL-18-stimulated human NK cells. Blood (2005) 105:282–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Nakahira M, Ahn H-J, Park W-R, Gao P, Tomura M, Park C-S, et al. Synergy of IL-12 and IL-18 for IFN-gamma gene expression: IL-12-induced STAT4 contributes to IFN-gamma promoter activation by up-regulating the binding activity of IL-18-induced activator protein 1. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2002) 168:1146–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.3.1146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Ohta A, Sitkovsky M. Role of G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature (2001) 414:916–20. doi: 10.1038/414916a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Ohta A, Gorelik E, Prasad SJ, Ronchese F, Lukashev D, Wong MKK, et al. A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2006) 103:13132–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605251103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Cekic C, Day Y-J, Sag D, Linden J. Myeloid expression of adenosine A2A receptor suppresses T and NK cell responses in the solid tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res (2014) 74:7250–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Lokshin A, Raskovalova T, Huang X, Zacharia LC, Jackson EK, Gorelik E. Adenosine-mediated inhibition of the cytotoxic activity and cytokine production by activated natural killer cells. Cancer Res (2006) 66:7758–65. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Young A, Ngiow SF, Gao Y, Patch A-M, Barkauskas DS, Messaoudene M, et al. A2AR adenosine signaling suppresses natural killer cell maturation in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res (2018) 78:1003–16. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Icer MA, Gezmen-Karadag M. The multiple functions and mechanisms of osteopontin. Clin Biochem (2018) 59:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Nagoshi S. Osteopontin: Versatile modulator of liver diseases. Hepatol Res Off J Jpn Soc Hepatol (2014) 44:22–30. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12166

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Kanayama M, Xu S, Danzaki K, Gibson JR, Inoue M, Gregory SG, et al. Skewing of the population balance of lymphoid and myeloid cells by secreted and intracellular osteopontin. Nat Immunol (2017) 18:973–84. doi: 10.1038/ni.3791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Leavenworth JW, Verbinnen B, Wang Q, Shen E, Cantor H. Intracellular osteopontin regulates homeostasis and function of natural killer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2015) 112:494–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423011112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Cabiati M, Gaggini M, Cesare MM, Caselli C, De Simone P, Filipponi F, et al. Osteopontin in hepatocellular carcinoma: A possible biomarker for diagnosis and follow-up. Cytokine (2017) 99:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Castello LM, Raineri D, Salmi L, Clemente N, Vaschetto R, Quaglia M, et al. Osteopontin at the crossroads of inflammation and tumor progression. Mediators Inflammation (2017) 2017:4049098. doi: 10.1155/2017/4049098

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Shirakawa K, Sano M. Osteopontin in cardiovascular diseases. Biomolecules (2021) 11:1047. doi: 10.3390/biom11071047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Coombes JD, Choi SS, Swiderska-Syn M, Manka P, Reid DT, Palma E, et al. Osteopontin is a proximal effector of leptin-mediated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta (2016) 1862:135–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.10.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Ma S, Yan J, Barr T, Zhang J, Chen Z, Wang L-S, et al. The RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 controls NK cell antitumor and antiviral immunity. J Exp Med (2021) 218:e20210279. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Yue Y, Liu J, He C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev (2015) 29:1343–55. doi: 10.1101/gad.262766.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, Wu H, et al. Recognition of RNA N6-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol (2018) 20:285–95. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0045-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Gulen MF, Kang Z, Bulek K, Youzhong W, Kim TW, Chen Y, et al. The receptor SIGIRR suppresses Th17 cell proliferation via inhibition of the interleukin-1 receptor pathway and mTOR kinase activation. Immunity (2010) 32:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Molgora M, Bonavita E, Ponzetta A, Riva F, Barbagallo M, Jaillon S, et al. IL-1R8 is a checkpoint in NK cells regulating anti-tumour and anti-viral activity. Nature (2017) 551:110–4. doi: 10.1038/nature24293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Bi J, Cheng C, Zheng C, Huang C, Zheng X, Wan X, et al. TIPE2 is a checkpoint of natural killer cell maturation and antitumor immunity. Sci Adv (2021) 7:eabi6515. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Tan S, Guo X, Li M, Wang T, Wang Z, Li C, et al. Transcription factor Zhx2 restricts NK cell maturation and suppresses their antitumor immunity. J Exp Med (2021) 218:e20210009. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. van Helden MJ, Goossens S, Daussy C, Mathieu A-L, Faure F, Marçais A, et al. Terminal NK cell maturation is controlled by concerted actions of T-bet and Zeb2 and is essential for melanoma rejection. J Exp Med (2015) 212:2015–25. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150809

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Cichocki F, Valamehr B, Bjordahl R, Zhang B, Rezner B, Rogers P, et al. GSK3 inhibition drives maturation of NK cells and enhances their antitumor activity. Cancer Res (2017) 77:5664–75. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Beurel E, Grieco SF, Jope RS. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol Ther (2015) 148:114–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Sun JC, Beilke JN, Lanier LL. Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells. Nature (2009) 457:557–61. doi: 10.1038/nature07665

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Hermida MA, Dinesh Kumar J, Leslie NR. GSK3 and its interactions with the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling network. Adv Biol Regul (2017) 65:5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2017.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Huttunen R, Syrjänen J. Obesity and the risk and outcome of infection. Int J Obes 2005 (2013) 37:333–40. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.62

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Adler BJ, Kaushansky K, Rubin CT. Obesity-driven disruption of haematopoiesis and the bone marrow niche. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2014) 10:737–48. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Bähr I, Goritz V, Doberstein H, Hiller GGR, Rosenstock P, Jahn J, et al. Diet-induced obesity is associated with an impaired NK cell function and an increased colon cancer incidence. J Nutr Metab (2017) 2017:4297025. doi: 10.1155/2017/4297025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Bähr I, Jahn J, Zipprich A, Pahlow I, Spielmann J, Kielstein H. Impaired natural killer cell subset phenotypes in human obesity. Immunol Res (2018) 66:234–44. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-8989-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Michelet X, Dyck L, Hogan A, Loftus RM, Duquette D, Wei K, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of natural killer cells in obesity limits antitumor responses. Nat Immunol (2018) 19:1330–40. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0251-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Obradovic M, Sudar-Milovanovic E, Soskic S, Essack M, Arya S, Stewart AJ, et al. Leptin and obesity: Role and clinical implication. Front Endocrinol (2021) 12:585887. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.585887

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Thon M, Hosoi T, Yoshii M, Ozawa K. Leptin induced GRP78 expression through the PI3K-mTOR pathway in neuronal cells. Sci Rep (2014) 4:7096. doi: 10.1038/srep07096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Marçais A, Cherfils-Vicini J, Viant C, Degouve S, Viel S, Fenis A, et al. The metabolic checkpoint kinase mTOR is essential for IL-15 signaling during the development and activation of NK cells. Nat Immunol (2014) 15:749–57. doi: 10.1038/ni.2936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Fahad Ullah M. Breast cancer: Current perspectives on the disease status. Adv Exp Med Biol (2019) 1152:51–64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Besson L, Mery B, Morelle M, Rocca Y, Heudel PE, You B, et al. Cutting edge: mTORC1 inhibition in metastatic breast cancer patients negatively affects peripheral NK cell maturation and number. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2021) 206:2265–70. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. McAuliffe PF, Meric-Bernstam F, Mills GB, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Deciphering the role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in breast cancer biology and pathogenesis. Clin Breast Cancer (2010) 10 Suppl 3:S59–65. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2010.s.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Marçais A, Marotel M, Degouve S, Koenig A, Fauteux-Daniel S, Drouillard A, et al. High mTOR activity is a hallmark of reactive natural killer cells and amplifies early signaling through activating receptors. eLife (2017) 6:e26423. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Takami A. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol (2018) 107:513–8. doi: 10.1007/s12185-018-2412-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Ferrara JLM, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E. Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet Lond Engl (2009) 373:1550–61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60237-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Shlomchik WD. Graft-versus-host disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2007) 7:340–52. doi: 10.1038/nri2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Bunting MD, Varelias A, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, Schuster IS, Lineburg KE, Kuns RD, et al. GVHD prevents NK-cell-dependent leukemia and virus-specific innate immunity. Blood (2017) 129:630–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-734020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Dowd JB, Aiello AE, Alley DE. Socioeconomic disparities in the seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in the US population: NHANES III. Epidemiol Infect (2009) 137:58–65. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808000551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Ho M. Epidemiology of cytomegalovirus infections. Rev Infect Dis (1990) 12 Suppl 7:S701–710. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_7.s701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Sun JC, Lopez-Verges S, Kim CC, DeRisi JL, Lanier LL. NK cells and immune “memory.” J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 (2011) 186:1891–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Gumá M, Angulo A, Vilches C, Gómez-Lozano N, Malats N, López-Botet M. Imprint of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire. Blood (2004) 104:3664–71. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Muntasell A, Vilches C, Angulo A, López-Botet M. Adaptive reconfiguration of the human NK-cell compartment in response to cytomegalovirus: a different perspective of the host-pathogen interaction. Eur J Immunol (2013) 43:1133–41. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Della Chiesa M, Falco M, Podestà M, Locatelli F, Moretta L, Frassoni F, et al. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of human NK cells developing after umbilical cord blood transplantation: a role for human cytomegalovirus? Blood (2012) 119:399–410. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-372003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Foley B, Cooley S, Verneris MR, Pitt M, Curtsinger J, Luo X, et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic transplantation promotes a lasting increase in educated NKG2C+ natural killer cells with potent function. Blood (2012) 119:2665–74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-386995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Elmaagacli AH, Steckel NK, Koldehoff M, Hegerfeldt Y, Trenschel R, Ditschkowski M, et al. Early human cytomegalovirus replication after transplantation is associated with a decreased relapse risk: evidence for a putative virus-versus-leukemia effect in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood (2011) 118:1402–12. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-304121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Marçais A, Viel S, Grau M, Henry T, Marvel J, Walzer T. Regulation of mouse NK cell development and function by cytokines. Front Immunol (2013) 4:450. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Jin J, Fu B, Mei X, Yue T, Sun R, Tian Z, et al. CD11b(-)CD27(-) NK cells are associated with the progression of lung carcinoma. PloS One (2013) 8:e61024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Gao Y, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, Bald T, Ng SS, Young A, Ngiow SF, et al. Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol (2017) 18:1004–15. doi: 10.1038/ni.3800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: NK cells, bone marrow, development, maturation, inflammation

Citation: Bourayou E and Golub R (2022) Inflammatory-driven NK cell maturation and its impact on pathology. Front. Immunol. 13:1061959. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1061959

Received: 05 October 2022; Accepted: 24 November 2022;
Published: 09 December 2022.

Edited by:

Alessandra Zingoni, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Reviewed by:

Fernando Guimaraes, Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Australia
Subramaniam Malarkannan, Medical College of Wisconsin, United States

Copyright © 2022 Bourayou and Golub. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elsa Bourayou, ZWxzYS5ib3VyYXlvdUBwYXN0ZXVyLmZy; Rachel Golub, cmFjaGVsLmdvbHViQHBhc3RldXIuZnI=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.