Yao Xiao
Hongqing Zhuang- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is one of the main treatment modalities for lung cancer, and the current SRT approach combined with immunotherapy has initially presented good clinical efficacy in lung cancer. SRT activates the immune system through in situ immunization, releasing antigens into the blood, which promotes the antigen–antibody response and then induces tumor cell apoptosis. Dose fractionation has different effects on the immune microenvironment, and the tumor microenvironment after SRT also changes over time, all of which have an impact on SRT combined immunotherapy. Although much research on the immune microenvironment of SRT has been conducted, many problems still require further exploration.
Introduction
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is one of the main methods used to treat lung cancer, and SRT combined with immunotherapy has presented good clinical efficacy in the treatment of lung cancer (1–4). Compared to conventional radiotherapy, SRT is characterized by a large single dose and a small number of fractionations. Traditionally, radiotherapy has achieved local tumor control by inducing irreversible DNA damage in irradiated tumor cells. However, the radiobiological mechanism of SRT has not been fully elucidated. Recent studies have reported that SRT changes the tumor microenvironment (TME) (5–7), activating the immune system via in situ immunization and releasing antigens into the blood, promoting antigen–antibody responses, and inducing apoptosis of tumor cells through anti-tumor immunity (8) and vascular injury (9). Dose fractionation of SRT results in different effects on the immune microenvironment (10), and the TME after SRT also changes over time, both of which have an impact on the effect of SRT combined with immunotherapy. Although there have been many studies on SRT in the immune microenvironment, many problems require further exploration. Here, we review the literature and summarize the research progress of SRT combined with immunotherapy to improve the understanding of the SRT effect on the immune microenvironment of lung cancer.
Effect of SRT on immune microenvironment of lung cancer
The TME is the internal environment for tumor survival and progression, and is related to tumor growth and metastasis (11). The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in the TME is composed of a series of immune cell types that have various roles. Effector cells with cell-killing functions kill cancer cells through different mechanisms in both innate and adaptive immune responses (12). Immunosuppressive cell populations in the TIME include CD4+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), anti-inflammatory macrophages, and some B-cell subsets (12), as well as antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), which play an important role in maintaining adaptive immune responses in the TIME (12). Moreover, the radiosensitivity of these cells is significantly different. Generally, NK and B lymphocytes are the most radiosensitive immune cells and DCs and Tregs are more radioresistant (13). Thus, the changes in the TIME after radiotherapy vary depending on dose fractionation, because dose fractionation leads to different proportions of various cell types in the TIME.
Effect of SRT on in situ immune microenvironment
The main mechanism of radiotherapy is to induce irreversible DNA damage in tumor cells directly or indirectly through free radicals. SRT induces immunogenic cell death and activates the adaptive immune response by promoting cross-presentation of tumor antigens by DCs to T cells (14). The antitumor response of effector T cells includes recognition of tumor antigens and attacking of cancer cells, which is related to MHC-I, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, and T cell receptor (TCR). Elevated MHC-I expression in tumor tissues after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) promotes the recognition of CD8+ T cells by in situ tumor-specific antigens. In early preclinical studies, the effects of hypofractionated radiotherapy protocols on the TIME are better than those of the conventional protocol, and the expression of MHC-I and related tumor peptides is higher with increasing radiotherapy dose (15, 16). A higher dose has been reported to enhance the upregulation of other immune signals, thereby improving tumor-specific CD8+ T cell infiltration (17, 18). SRT improves TCR sequence diversity and PD-L1 expression in the TME of lung cancer patients (5), but its promotion of the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and NK cells in the TME has not been observed, possibly because of differences in fractionated radiotherapy doses or sampling time points. A recent phase II randomized trial of SBRT combined with durvalumab or durvalumab alone in patients with early-stage operable NSCLC reported major pathological response rates of 53.3% (95%CI 34.3%–71.7%) and 6.7% (95%CI 0.8%–22.1%), respectively, with statistical significance (19). Importantly, significantly higher MHC-I gene expression was identified in post-treatment tumor specimens of patients with significant pathological remission in the combination group. Furthermore, CD8+ T cells recognized tumor neoantigens that were upregulated by RT when metastatic NSCLC patients were treated with the same treatment (20).
Effect of SRT on humoral immunity
Increasing evidence indicates that SRT can induce significant antitumor effects (5, 16, 21, 22). Generally, cellular immunity is dominant among antitumor immunity, and humoral immunity usually plays a synergistic role only in some cases. For most tumors with strong immunogenicity, specific immune responses are predominant, but for those with weak immunogenicity, non-specific immune responses may be of higher importance. Humoral immunity is a non-specific immune response, and circulating antibodies mainly produce immune responses against tumor cells with weak antigenicity in a free state (Figure 1). B lymphocytes are not only antigen-presenting cells but also important antibody-producing cells. Studies have indicated that tumor immunity is induced in NSCLC patients receiving SBRT through upregulated IgG and/or IgM (23). Zhang et al. (24) analyzed the peripheral blood immune cells of NSCLC patients after hypofractionated SRT (HSRT) and found that the proportion of naive B cells and double-negative B cells was low after moderate-dose HSRT (48 Gy/8 F or 48 Gy/6 F). However, the proportions of MZ-like B cells, transition B cells, and plasmablastic cells were higher. Lei et al. (25) found that compared with single low-dose irradiation (2 Gy), single high-dose irradiation (10 Gy) significantly stimulated the secretion of A549-related exosomes in a dose rate-dependent manner. Exosomes derived from ultra-high dose-rate radiation contribute to the polarization of B and NK cell subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, thereby achieving greater antitumor immune responses.
Figure 1 Mechanism of anti-tumor humoral immunity after SBRT. After SBRT, many tumor-associated antigen (TAA) fragments are released into the blood and stimulate the differentiation of B lymphocytes into plasma cells. Furthermore, plasma cells produce antibodies and bind to tumor cells to form antigen–antibody complexes, and are then phagocytosed and cleared by macrophages.
Differences in SRT dose effects on the immune microenvironment
Radiotherapy in clinical treatment aims to maximize the damage to the target area and minimize the damage to the adjacent healthy tissue. Generally, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy refers to a one-time dose of 20–34 Gy or a single dose of 10–15 Gy for a total of 3–5 times (26, 27), as well as hypofractionated protocols, i.e., a single dose of >2 Gy and <10 Gy, accumulating until the total dose of ablation (defined as the dose achieving >90% local control) or the total sub-ablation is achieved depending on the tumor location, type, and therapeutic purpose. These radiotherapy protocols differ in their immunomodulatory effects (28) (Table 1). Most preclinical studies of the immunomodulatory effects of SRT applied solid tumor models and single RT doses of 10 to 20 Gy or hypofractionated non-ablative protocols (e.g., 8 Gy × 3 F). Among them, the 8 Gy × 3 F hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol is a common immunomodulatory protocol in early preclinical studies (36) that can induce a stronger IFN-I response than the conventional protocol (37). Ablation doses, such as 20 Gy/Fx, lead to severe cell death and depletion of radiation-resistant inhibitory immune cells in the TME, but may also result in elevated levels of fibrosis and chronic inflammatory/immunosuppressive pathways (38, 39). In 2020, Lu et al. initiated a triple therapy of low-dose radiotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy and immunotherapy, and preliminarily verified its efficacy in a tumor-bearing mouse model and retrospective clinical data (10). This study revealed the potential mechanism of therapy combining different radiotherapies and immunotherapy: hypofractionated radiotherapy induces apoptosis of in situ tumor cells, exposes tumor-specific antigens, produces an “in situ vaccination” effect, and sensitizes tumor-specific T cells; low-dose radiotherapy promotes migration of tumor-specific T cells into the distal tumor and regulates the immune microenvironment of the distal tumor, which jointly produces CD8+ T cell-dependent immune effects; and PD-1 inhibitors restore the tumor-killing activity of T cells by loosening the “inhibitory brake” on the surface of T cells and further enhancing systemic anti-tumor effects. The results of this study suggest the potentially important clinical application value of low-dose radiotherapy in immune activation. Thus, high- or low-dose treatment is ultimately determined by the purpose of clinical treatment.
Table 1 Pre-clinical and clinical reports using RT ± immunotherapy as radiation dose difference of immune activation.
Changes in immune microenvironment correlated with different phases of SRT
The TIME has different manifestations before and after SRT. In a preliminary study, changes in circulating blood immune cell populations were observed in lung tumor patients treated with SRT, which included an increase in immunoreactive components and a decrease in immunosuppressive components. Although these changes did not show statistical significance, they appeared 72 h after SBRT and continued until 6 months after treatment (21). Zhang et al. (24) analyzed peripheral blood immune cells from six NSCLC patients with stage I disease who received HSRT and found that HSRT greatly activated the immune response 3 weeks after treatment. Another preclinical study (33) reported increases in cell-surface markers of immune regulation (CD80), stress (CRT, HSP70, FAS, and MHC-I), and immunosuppression (CD47 and PD-L1) at 6 h after radiotherapy in 3LL tumor-bearing mice treated with ablative radiotherapy. Moreover, mice sequentially exposed to low-dose post-ablation modulation had significantly delayed tumor growth and improved survival. Moreover, by increasing the infiltration of immune effector cells and reducing Tregs in irradiated tumors and secondary lymphoid organs, TME remodeling was promoted, and immunogenic potential was improved after ablative radiotherapy even 6 days after the initiation of radiotherapy (33). A recent study (35) analyzed the dynamic changes in the TIME after hypofractionated radiotherapy in mice and NSCLC patients. The results showed that HFRT induced an increase in CD8 T cells and positive immune cytokine responses at specific periods and fractionated doses. In this study, the optimal time window of the immune response was from 48 hours to 2 weeks, especially in the 6.2 Gy group. The optimal immune response was observed in the 10 Gy × 2 group after 96 h, and the intervention with immunotherapy may achieve better outcomes within such a time window. These studies provide a reference for the timing of SBRT combined with immunotherapy in the clinic.
Buchwal et al. reviewed several preclinical studies and suggested that, ideally, anti-PD-1/L1 and RT should be conducted simultaneously; if not, at least RT should be conducted at first (40). In a retrospective analysis of 125 patients who received SBRT/SRS immunotherapy including 90 patients (72%) with lung cancer, patients who completed immunotherapy before SBRT/SRS appeared to have worse OS than those receiving immunotherapy simultaneously or later (41). Multivariate analysis indicated that the timing of immunotherapy is still a significant prognostic factor for OS when considering age, sex, cancer type (lung cancer and other cancers), and radiotherapy type (P = 0.0), which is consistent with previous preclinical studies. Given that immunomodulators have different targets, the sequence of immunotherapy and radiotherapy depends on the mechanism of immunomodulators.
Discussion
With the emerging efficacy of SRT combined with immunotherapy, the mechanism of SRT effects on the immune microenvironment needs to be explored. Although there have been many studies on the SRT immune microenvironment, there are still some problems.
Insufficient research on the SRT immune microenvironment
Although there are increasing preclinical and clinical data on the combination of radiotherapy and immunomodulators, and the application prospect is exciting, most of the available data are currently from retrospective or small cohorts. Many problems related to the use of SRT to improve clinical conversion to immunotherapy efficacy remain unsolved, such as dose fractionation, treatment sequence, selection of immunomodulators, and biomarkers predicting treatment response (42). In particular, there are few studies about the immune microenvironment of SRT in some special sites of metastases. For example, brain metastases (BM), as the brain is a common distant metastatic organ of NSCLC. Compared with extracranial tumors, the immune microenvironment of intracranial tumors is unique and highly specific. The specific immune cells in the intracranial TIME mainly include microglia and astrocytes, showing heterogeneity (43). The TIME of BM is generally immunosuppressive compared to the primary foci of lung. Although there is no research on the impact of SRT on the immune microenvironment of lung cancer BM, a case report (44) showed an extracranial abscopal effect after BM stereotactic radiotherapy as second-line treatment with atezolizumab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. These need to be explored in large, randomized studies.
Effects of SRT on the immune microenvironment targeting the dominant population
The immune microenvironment varies in different tumors, pathological types, and stages of tumor progression. The effect of SRT on the TIME is also different. Thus, more targeted studies are needed to identify the dominant population and to implement individualized treatment to maximize the clinical benefits.
Study of the immune microenvironment of SRT to solve clinical problems in SRT patients
All types of studies must ultimately serve the clinic. SRT studies on the immune microenvironment aim to solve the clinical problems of SRT patients, improve clinical outcomes to a maximum extent, and contribute to the eventual implementation of survival benefits.
Author contributions
Concept and design: HZ. Drafting and revision of the manuscript: YX. Obtained funding: HZ. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China for the development of the proton beam transmission system and proton therapy nozzle (No. 2019YFF01014403).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Lubas MJ, Kumar SS. The combined use of sbrt and immunotherapy-a literature review. Curr Oncol Rep (2020) 22(12):117. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00986-9
2. Wang Z, Wei L, Li J, Zhou H, Li S, Chen D, et al. Combing stereotactic body radiotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors after oligoprogression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res (2021) 10(12):4368–79. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-682
3. Akanda ZZ, Neeson PJ, John T, Barnett S, Hanna GG, Miller A, et al. A narrative review of combined stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res (2021) 10(6):2766–78. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1117
4. Bestvina CM, Pointer KB, Karrison T, Al-Hallaq H, Hoffman PC, Jelinek MJ, et al. A phase 1 trial of concurrent or sequential ipilimumab, nivolumab, and stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with stage iv nsclc study. J Thorac Oncol (2022) 17(1):130–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.019
5. Zhou P, Chen D, Zhu B, Chen W, Xie Q, Wang Y, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is effective in modifying the tumor genome and tumor immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer or lung metastatic carcinoma. Front Immunol (2021) 11:594212. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.594212
6. Clément-Colmou K, Potiron V, Pietri M, Guillonneau M, Jouglar E, Chiavassa S, et al. Influence of radiotherapy fractionation schedule on the tumor vascular microenvironment in prostate and lung cancer models. Cancers (2020) 12(1):121. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010121
7. Tubin S, Khan MK, Salerno G, Mourad WF, Yan W, Jeremic B. Mono-institutional phase 2 study of innovative stereotactic body radiotherapy targeting partial tumor hypoxic (Sbrt-pathy) clonogenic cells in unresectable bulky non-small cell lung cancer: Profound non-targeted effects by sparing peri-tumoral immune microenvironment. Radiat Oncol (2019) 14(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1410-1
8. Chajon E, Castelli J, Marsiglia H, De Crevoisier R. The synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy: A promising but not simple partnership. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol (2017) 111:124–32. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.01.017
9. Zhuang H, Zhuang H, Lang N, Liu J. Precision stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal tumors: Mechanism, efficacy, and issues. Front Oncol (2020) 10:826. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00826
10. Yin L, Xue J, Li R, Zhou L, Deng L, Chen L, et al. Effect of low-dose radiation therapy on abscopal responses to hypofractionated radiation therapy and anti-Pd1 in mice and patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2020) 108(1):212–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.002
11. Mantovani A, Ponzetta A, Inforzato A, Jaillon S. Innate immunity, inflammation and tumour progression: Double-edged swords. J Internal Med (2019) 285(5):524–32. doi: 10.1111/joim.12886
12. Leone RD, Powell JD. Metabolism of immune cells in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2020) 20(9):516–31. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0273-y
13. Jarosz-Biej M, Smolarczyk R, Cichoń T, Kułach N. Tumor microenvironment as a "Game changer" in cancer radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(13):3212. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133212
14. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Warren S, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, Martinez AB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death. J Immunother Cancer (2020) 8(1):e000337. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000337
15. Reits EA, Hodge JW, Herberts CA, Groothuis TA, Chakraborty M, Wansley EK, et al. Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances mhc class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy. J Exp Med (2006) 203(5):1259–71. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052494
16. Chen Y, Gao M, Huang Z, Yu J, Meng X. Sbrt combined with pd-1/Pd-L1 inhibitors in nsclc treatment: A focus on the mechanisms, advances, and future challenges. J Hematol Oncol (2020) 13(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00940-z
17. Schaue D, Ratikan JA, Iwamoto KS, McBride WH. Maximizing tumor immunity with fractionated radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 83(4):1306–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.049
18. Garnett CT, Palena C, Chakraborty M, Tsang KY, Schlom J, Hodge JW. Sublethal irradiation of human tumor cells modulates phenotype resulting in enhanced killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res (2004) 64(21):7985–94. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1525
19. Altorki NK, McGraw TE, Borczuk AC, Saxena A, Port JL, Stiles BM, et al. Neoadjuvant durvalumab with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-Small-Cell lung cancer: A single-centre, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22(6):824–35. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00149-2
20. Formenti SC, Rudqvist NP, Golden E, Cooper B, Wennerberg E, Lhuillier C, et al. Radiotherapy induces responses of lung cancer to ctla-4 blockade. Nat Med (2018) 24(12):1845–51. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0232-2
21. Navarro-Martín A, Galiana IL, Berenguer Frances MA, Cacicedo J, Cañas Cortés R, Comas Anton S, et al. Preliminary study of the effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy (Sbrt) on the immune system in lung cancer patients unfit for surgery: Immunophenotyping analysis. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(12):3963. doi: 10.3390/ijms19123963
22. Breen WG, Leventakos K, Dong H, Merrell KW. Radiation and immunotherapy: Emerging mechanisms of synergy. J Thorac Dis (2020) 12(11):7011–23. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-cptn-07
23. Lockney NA, Zhang M, Morris CG, Nichols RC, Okunieff P, Swarts S, et al. Radiation-induced tumor immunity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer (2019) 10(7):1605–11. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13122
24. Zhang T, Yu H, Ni C, Zhang T, Liu L, Lv Q, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy activates the peripheral immune response in operable stage I non-Small-Cell lung cancer. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):4866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04978-x
25. Lei QQ, Sui JD, Jin F, Luo HL, Shan JJ, Tang L, et al. Impact of high-dose rate radiotherapy on b and natural killer (Nk) cell polarization in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Pbmcs) via inducing non-small cell lung cancer (Nsclc)-derived exosomes. Trans Cancer Res (2021) 10(7):3538–47. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-536
26. Osborn VW, Lee A, Yamada Y. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal malignancies. Technol Cancer Res Treat (2018) 17:1533033818802304. doi: 10.1177/1533033818802304
27. Lieverse RIY, Van Limbergen EJ, Oberije CJG, Troost EGC, Hadrup SR, Dingemans AC, et al. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (Sabr) combined with immunotherapy (L19-Il2) versus standard of care in stage iv nsclc patients, immunosabr: A multicentre, randomised controlled open-label phase ii trial. BMC Cancer (2020) 20(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07055-1
28. Charpentier M, Spada S, Van Nest SJ, Demaria S. Radiation therapy-induced remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol (2022) 9:S1044–579X(22)00098–0. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.04.003
29. Iyengar P, Wardak Z, Gerber DE, Tumati V, Ahn C, Hughes RS, et al. Consolidative radiotherapy for limited metastatic non-Small-Cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol (2018) 4(1):e173501. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3501
30. Wang F, Luo Y, Tian X, Ma S, Sun Y, You C, et al. Impact of radiotherapy concurrent with anti-Pd-1 therapy on the lung tissue of tumor-bearing mice. Radiat Res (2019) 191(3):271–7. doi: 10.1667/rr15182.1
31. Bauml JM, Mick R, Ciunci C, Aggarwal C, Davis C, Evans T, et al. Pembrolizumab after completion of locally ablative therapy for oligometastatic non–small cell lung cancer: A phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5(9):1283–90. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1449
32. Theelen W, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Aerts J, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the pembro-rt phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5(9):1276–82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478
33. Savage T, Pandey S, Guha C. Postablation modulation after single high-dose radiation therapy improves tumor control Via enhanced immunomodulation. Clin Cancer Res (2020) 26(4):910–21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3518
34. Schoenfeld JD, Giobbie-Hurder A, Ranasinghe S, Kao KZ, Lako A, Tsuji J, et al. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab alone or in combination with low-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy in metastatic non-Small-Cell lung cancer refractory to previous Pd(L)-1 therapy: An open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol (2022) 23(2):279–91. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00658-6
35. Zhao X, Li J, Zheng L, Yang Q, Chen X, Chen X, et al. Immune response on optimal timing and fractionation dose for hypofractionated radiotherapy in non-Small-Cell lung cancer. Front Mol Biosci (2022) 9:786864. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.786864
36. Demaria S, Guha C, Schoenfeld J, Morris Z, Monjazeb A, Sikora A, et al. Radiation dose and fraction in immunotherapy: One-size regimen does not fit all settings, so how does one choose? J Immunother Cancer (2021) 9(4):e002038. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002038
37. Monjazeb AM, Schalper KA, Villarroel-Espindola F, Nguyen A, Shiao SL, Young K. Effects of radiation on the tumor microenvironment. Semin Radiat Oncol (2020) 30(2):145–57. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.12.004
38. Vanpouille-Box C, Alard A, Aryankalayil MJ, Sarfraz Y, Diamond JM, Schneider RJ, et al. DNA Exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumour immunogenicity. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15618
39. Harding SM, Benci JL, Irianto J, Discher DE, Minn AJ, Greenberg RA. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature (2017) 548(7668):466–70. doi: 10.1038/nature23470
40. Buchwald ZS, Wynne J, Nasti TH, Zhu S, Mourad WF, Yan W, et al. Radiation, immune checkpoint blockade and the abscopal effect: A critical review on timing, dose and fractionation. Front Oncol (2018) 8:612. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00612
41. Woody S, Hegde A, Arastu H, Peach MS, Sharma N, Walker P, et al. Survival is worse in patients completing immunotherapy prior to Sbrt/Srs compared to those receiving it concurrently or after. Front Oncol (2022) 12:785350. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.785350
42. Milic M, Mondini M, Deutsch E. How to improve sbrt outcomes in nsclc: From pre-clinical modeling to successful clinical translation. Cancers (2022) 14(7):1705. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071705
43. Luo L, Liu P, Zhao K, Zhao W, Zhang X. The immune microenvironment in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol (2021) 11:698844. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.698844
Keywords: immune microenvironment, lung cancer, stereotactic radiotherapy, SBRT, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), immunotherapy
Citation: Xiao Y and Zhuang H (2022) Effect of stereotactic radiotherapy on immune microenvironment of lung cancer. Front. Immunol. 13:1025872. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025872
Received: 23 August 2022; Accepted: 02 September 2022;
Published: 23 September 2022.
Edited by:
Huanfa Yi, Jilin University, ChinaReviewed by:
Feng Liu, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, ChinaSiyu Shi, Stanford Healthcare, United States
Copyright © 2022 Xiao and Zhuang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hongqing Zhuang, aG9uZ3Fpbmd6aHVhbmdAMTYzLmNvbQ==