The Influence of Corticosteroids, Immunosuppressants and Biologics on Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Psoriasis and Rheumatic Diseases in the Era of COVID-19: A Review of Current Evidence

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or other rheumatic diseases treated with corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologics might face additional risk during COVID-19 epidemic due to their immunocompromised status. However, there was still no unanimous opinion on the use of these therapy during COVID-19 epidemic. Current studies suggested that systemic corticosteroids might increase the risk of hospitalization, as well as risks of ventilation, ICU, and death among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Anti-TNF agent was associated with lower rate of hospitalization, as well as lower risks of ventilation, ICU, and death. No significant changes in rates of hospitalization, ventilation, ICU and mortality were observed in patients treated with immunomodulators or biologics apart from anti-TNF agents. The underlying mechanism of these results might be related to pathway of antiviral immune response and cytokine storm induced by SARS-COV-2 infection. Decision on the use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologics should be made after weighing the benefits and potential risks based on individual patients.

Introduction

Since December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread around the globe and become a worldwide health threat. Patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) might develop pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure and even death. Inflammatory bowel disease was considered to be associated with psoriasis and other rheumatic diseases like ankylosing spondylitis, as the prevalence of psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis was significantly higher in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and their first-degree relatives than control cohort, and vice versa (1–5). Some studies reported risk gene loci shared by inflammatory bowel disease psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, including IL23R, IL12B, indicating shared pathophysiology of these diseases (6–9). Overall, the medications for these diseases were similar. Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases mentioned above usually receive corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or biologics like anti-TNF agents, which can downregulate the patient’s immune response to some extent and in turn influence the clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19. A meta-analysis conducted by Shintaro et al. on Oct 2020 reported that the prevalence of COVID-19 among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases was 0.011 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.005-0.025), which was significantly higher than those in control group (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95%CI 1.05-4.58, p=0.04) (10). The incidence of hospitalization and mortality among patients with COVID-19 and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases was 0.35 (95%CI 0.23-0.50) and 0.066 (95%CI 0.036-0.12), respectively (10). However, the heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis was considerable. Thus, more evidence is needed. It is worth cautioning that therapies based on immune suppression might prolong virus clearance and expose patients to adverse effects and superinfection. Additionally, immunocompromised patients might not display typical symptoms at the early phase of COVID-19, which could lead to a delay in intervention. On the other hand, therapies including corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologics can induce and maintain remission of diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis and other rheumatic diseases in these patients, making patients more resistant to virus invasion. Corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics could suppress inflammatory response, which might reduce the damage caused by COVID-19. In this review, we aimed to summarize the real-world data about the impact of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and biologics on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis and other rheumatic diseases. We searched on the database of Pubmed and Embase using terms (COVID-19 OR SARS-COV-2) AND (corticosteroids OR prednisone OR hydrocortisone OR dexamethasone OR immunomodulator OR immunosuppressant OR biologics) AND (autoimmune OR inflammatory OR rheumatic). The last search was performed on 20^th Dec 2020. Studies relevant to the purpose of our review was included. The references of included studies were also viewed.

The Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 is a kind of coronavirus that spreads among people through respiratory droplets and close contact. According to the WHO Coronavirus Disease Dashboard, up to 22nd May 2021, the cumulative death rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection is 2.07% (3,437,545/165,772,430).

Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 show symptoms of damage to multiple organs, including the lung, heart, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, cough, myalgia, dyspnea, and diarrhea. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart failure, secondary infections, acute kidney injury, and shock are severe complications seen in COVID-19 (11). SARS-CoV-2 enters human cells by binding its S (spike) protein envelope to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is present in type II alveolar cells, nasal mucosa, upper respiratory tract, endothelium, heart, kidney, and intestine cells (12, 13). SARS-CoV-2 could enter T cells through CD147 (14). SARS-CoV-2 induces cytokine storms in patients and leads to severe systemic reactions. SARS-CoV-2 induces cell death and the release of numerous chemokines that recruit immune cells. Proinflammatory mediators, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-α, are released and induce naïve T-cells to become Th1 or cytotoxic lymphocytes, which in turn secrete more cytokines. The immune complex of IL-6/IL-6R acts on gp130 and regulates MCP-1 and GM-CSF via the JAK-STAT pathway.

There might be concurrent macrophage activation syndrome driven by IL-1β, immunoparalysis (decreased HLA-DR on CD14 monocytes) and global lymphopenia driven by IL-6 in cases of COVID-19 (15). (14) TNF‐α also plays a part in lymphopenia. Diao et al. reported an association between higher serum levels of TNF‐α and lower lymphocyte counts (16). An in vitro experiment showed that TNF‐α could induce apoptosis of human T lymphocytes by binding to TNF‐RI (17). Lymphopenia leads to delayed viral clearance and, in turn, diversion of the adaptive immune response towards innate‐mediated inflammatory responses and cytokine storm, which ultimately leads to higher mortality from COVID-19 (18).

Evidence on the Impact of Corticosteroids, Immunosuppressants and Biologics on Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Psoriasis, and Other Rheumatic Diseases

Corticosteroids

Several studies reported the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis and other rheumatic diseases receiving corticosteroids during COVID-19. The baseline characteristics of relevant studies were summarized in Table 1. The association of corticosteroids use and hospitalization was summarized as Figure 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of cohort studies included.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 The association of corticosteroids and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID).

As for the corticosteroids use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We retrieved data from SECURE-IBD on 18^th May 2021 and calculated the odds ratios, and the incidences of hospitalization (OR 3.57,95% CI 2.85-4.46, P<0.01), ICU (OR 4.80, 95% CI 3.23-7.01, P<0.01), ventilation (OR 3.94, 95% CI 2.45-6.15, P<0.01), and death (OR 5.45, 95% CI 3.30-8.74, P<0.01) were higher in patients who received oral/parenteral corticosteroids than those who did not (27). However, multivariate analysis was not conducted, as the data based on individual patients was not available. The potential influence by patients’ age, disease severity and comorbidities on results mentioned above could not be evaluated. Nonetheless, the result mentioned above was consistent with the report by Allocca, in which 97 patients with IBD were included, and treatment with corticosteroids was also associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (OR 7.69, 95% CI 1.48–40.05) at multivariable analysis (25). These results were consistent to a meta-analysis conducted by Anupam et.al., which showed that among patients with IBD, steroids increased the risk of hospitalization (RR 1.99, 95%CI 1.64–2.40; I^{2 =} 3%), need for ICU (RR 3.41, 95%CI 2.28–5.11; I^{2 =} 0) and mortality (RR 2.70, 95%CI 1.61–4.55; I^{2 =} 0) (28).

Corticosteroids was reported to be associated with higher risk of hospitalization among patients with COVID-19 and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. According to a cohort of 694 patients with rheumatic and inflammatory diseases in France, corticosteroids was associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio[aOR]=2.25, 95% CI: 1.33–3.79), hospitalization(aOR=2.76, 95% CI: 1.90–4.02,P<0.01) and mortality(aOR=2.64, 95% CI:1.36–5.12) (22).An analysis of data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry using a multivariable-adjusted model showed that prednisone≥10 mg/day was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.96) (20) and mortality(aOR1.69, 95%CI 1.18 to 2.41) (21). Mariangela Allocca reported a series of 41 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID), and corticosteroids was associated with a higher hospitalization rate (OR 6.94, 95%CI 1.13-42.3, P=0.03) and a higher rate of oxygen need(OR14.5, 95%CI 2.18−96.43) in univariate analysis, however, in multivariate analysis, comorbidities were the only independent risk factor for hospitalization and oxygen need (19). A cohort of 86 patients with IMID showed a higher incidence of hospitalization in those who received oral corticosteroids (adjusted OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.07-1.77) (24). A higher risk of hospitalization associated to corticosteroids was also seen in a cohort of 77 IMID patients (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.28-26.1, P<0.05) but the result was not adjusted based on age, comorbidities, etc. (23) By results from ReumaCoV Brasil registry, methylprednisolone pulse therapy was associated with higher risk of hospitalization(prevalence ratio, PR 2.50; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.92; p<0.001) and ICU (PR 1.65; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68; p<0.043) (25–28).

However, there are some limitations of these studies, including the study design, sample size, and follow-up. Data were collected from registries (which collect cases submitted by physicians) or case series, and the continuity of enrollment was not guaranteed. The baseline of enrolled patients was not balanced. Additionally, selection bias might exist, as reports mainly came from inpatient centers in epidemic areas, and patients with more severe disease were more likely to be reported. Moreover, confounding factors such as age, comorbidities, and concomitant drug use might to some extent explain the association between corticosteroids and clinical outcomes, and these factors were not evaluated in Veenstra’s reports.

For all of the limitations mentioned above, the impact of corticosteroids on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 might be overestimated. Even so, researchers and organizations agreed that decisions on corticosteroid use should be made with caution in patients with autoimmune diseases. Guidelines by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), and the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD) recommended that systemic corticosteroids (especially prednisone>20 mg/d) should be tapered or switched to budesonide during the COVID-19 pandemic but should not be stopped at once (29–31). According to the American College of Rheumatology and German Society of Rheumatology, corticosteroids should be continued or initiated when needed, and the side effects should be monitored, especially when corticosteroids are used at high doses (32, 33). It is recommended that patients receiving corticosteroids be cautiously protected from infections by avoiding exposure to pathogens and optimizing nutrition and vaccination when needed.

Immunomodulators

Immunomodulators seemed not be associated with altered risk of hospitalization. According to our analysis of data from SECURE-IBD, 6-MP/azathioprine (AZA) was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.16-1.85, P<0.01) and ICU(OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.16-2.90, P<0.01), and did not lead to significant change in risk of ventilation, and death(P>0.1) methotrexate (MTX) did not significantly alter the incidence of hospitalization, ICU, ventilation or death (27). A meta-analysis conducted by Anupam et al. confirmed no significant association between use of immunomodulators in IBD patients and risk of hospitalization (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.37–2.10; I^{2 =} 83%), need for ICU (RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.17–3.02; I^{2 =} 45%) and mortality (RR 1.18, 95%CI 0.23–6.01; I^{2 =} 55%) (28).

Two study explored the impact of immunomodulators on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Allocca et al. reported a cohort of 41 patients showed that immunosuppressants were not associated with altered risk of hospitalization and oxygen need (19). A cohort of 86 patients with IMID showed a higher risk of hospitalization in those who received methotrexate (adjustedOR 1.29, 95%CI 1.04-1.58) and no significant difference in risk of hospitalization in patients receiving azathioprine(adjusted OR 0.86 95%CI 0.43-1.69) (24).

Immunomodulators, including azathioprine (AZA), cyclophosphamide (CTX), and MTX, were recommended to be discontinued in patients with COVID-19 and not to be initiated during the pandemic. Evidence is still insufficient to demonstrate the influence of immunomodulators on COVID-19. Adverse effects of immunomodulators might affect the patient’s quality of life. One example was that AZA or CTX may cause lymphopenia, which was reported to be associated with mortality from COVID-19 (18).

Therefore, the use of immunomodulators should be evaluated based on individual cases. Physicians should weigh the side effects and the benefits of immunosuppressive drugs before making clinical decisions. As the pandemic interferes with normal medical care, the monitoring of adverse effects of immunomodulators should be optimized and individualized. This additional risk of unsurveillanced adverse effects should be cautioned by physicians.

Biologics

To explore the association between biologics used for treating inflammatory bowel disease, we performed secondary data analysis using published data from SECURE- IBD on 23^rd May 2021. The results were shown in Figures 2–5. We found that among IBD patients infected by COVID-19, anti-TNF agents were associated with lower incidences of hospitalization (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.39-0.54, P<0.01), ICU (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.54, P<0.01), ventilation (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.48, P<0.01), and death (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.11-0.38, P<0.01). The rate of hospitalization and ICU admission was lower in patients receiving anti-TNF-agent monotherapy than those treated with anti-TNF agents combined with 6MP/AZA/MTX (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.42-0.74, P<0.01 and OR 0.37,95% CI 0.25-0.54, P<0.01, respectively). IL-12/23 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.36-0.67, P<0.01), and ICU (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20-0.94, P=0.03). Anti-integrin agents or JAK inhibitor did not significantly alter the risk of hospitalization, ICU, ventilation or death (27). However, from published data on the SECURE-IBD registry, we could not calculate the adjusted OR for each factor, as detailed information on individual patients was not available. We found that older age and comorbidities were significantly strong predictors for hospitalization/ICU/ventilation/death (27). The difference in the incidences of hospitalization/ICU/ventilation/death among patients treated with biologics might to some extent be due to the age distribution or comorbidities. The association between biologics and clinical outcome of COVID-19 should be verified by more studies.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 The association of biologics and hospitalization rate among IBD patients with COVID-19 according to data from SECURE-IBD (27). [The group ‘anti-TNF agent monotherapy’ was compared to the group receiving anti-TNF agent combined with 6MP/AZA/MTX. The other groups (‘Anti-TNF agents’, ‘IL-12/23 inhibitors’, ‘Anti-integrin agents’ and ‘JAK inhibitor’) were compared to those did not receive the corresponding biologics].

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 The association of biologics and ICU admission rate among IBD patients with COVID-19 according to data from SECURE-IBD (27). [The group ‘anti-TNF agent monotherapy’ was compared to the group receiving anti-TNF agent combined with 6MP/AZA/MTX. The other groups (‘Anti-TNF agents’, ‘IL-12/23 inhibitors’, ‘Anti-integrin agents’ and ‘JAK inhibitor’) were compared to those did not receive the corresponding biologics].

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 The association of biologics and ventilation rate among IBD patients with COVID-19 according to data from SECURE-IBD (27). [The group ‘anti-TNF agent monotherapy’ was compared to the group receiving anti-TNF agent combined with 6MP/AZA/MTX. The other groups (‘Anti-TNF agents’, ‘IL-12/23 inhibitors’, ‘Anti-integrin agents’ and ‘JAK inhibitor’) were compared to those did not receive the corresponding biologics].

FIGURE 5

Figure 5 The association of biologics and mortality rate among IBD patients with COVID-19 according to data from SECURE-IBD (27). [The group ‘anti-TNF agent monotherapy’ was compared to the group receiving anti-TNF agent combined with 6MP/AZA/MTX. The other groups (‘Anti-TNF agents’, ‘IL-12/23 inhibitors’, ‘Anti-integrin agents’ and ‘JAK inhibitor’) were compared to those did not receive the corresponding biologics].

Biologic use in patients with psoriasis showed no significant correlation with the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Studies conducted by Damiani in May 2020 reported that in psoriasis patients, biologic treatment increased the risk of hospitalization (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.49‐8.63, P<0.01), but it did not increase the risk of ICU admission(OR 3.41, 95%CI 0.21‐54.55, P =0.39) or death (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.03‐6.59, P = 0.53) (34). The studies by Gisondi(5206 psoriasis, up to 1^st April 2020) and S.I. Cho et al.(7590 skin disease, up to 15^th May 2020) found no impact of biologics on clinical outcomes, including mortality, among patients with skin diseases (35, 36). The sample sizes of these studies were relatively large. However, the sample sizes of patients receiving biologics apart from anti-TNF and anti-IL-17 agents were relatively small. The studies mentioned above were retrospective or cross-sectional. Detailed information, including drug dosage, drug combination, and classification of psoriasis, was insufficient.Anti-TNF agents seemed to play a protective role in COVID-19 among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The association between anti-TNF agents and hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 reported by some studies was shown in Figure 6. According to a cohort of 694 patients with rheumatic and inflammatory diseases in France(published in Dec 2020), use of anti-TNF agents did not increase the risk of severe COVID-19 (OR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.19–1.04) or death (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.22–2.01), and reduce the rate of hospitalization (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.95,P<0.01) (22). Analysis based on COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry showed that anti-TNF agents were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.81) (20) and did not alter the mortality(aOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.52-1.36) (21), after controlling factors of age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidities and concomitant medication (20). Additionally, according to Veenstra et.al., anti-TNF agents decreased the risk of hospitalization (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.73, P<0.05), but did not alter risk of ventilation(OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.05-4.49) and mortality(OR 0.75,95%CI 0.06-6.53) among patients with IMID, however these results were not adjusted and did not reflect the independent effect of anti-TNF agents on clinical outcomes (23). According to ReumaCoV Brasil registry, no use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) was associated with higher risk of hospitalization(PR 2.51;95% CI 1.16 to 5.45; p=0.004) (26). These results were demonstrated in Figure 3. A meta-analysis conducted by Anupam et al. reported lower relative risk of hospitalization (RR 0.34, 95%CI 0.19–0.61; I^{2 =} 67%), need for ICU (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.33–0.72; I^{2 =} 0) and mortality (RR 0.22, 95%CI 0.13–0.38; I^{2 =} 0) among IBD patients who were treated with biological agents (28).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6 The association of anti-TNF agents and hospitalization of COVID-19 among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID)

The studies mentioned above indicated that anti-TNF agents decreased the risk of hospitalization. However, the limitations of these studies were as follows. The cohorts of these studies were mixtures of patients with different kinds of immune-mediated inflammatory disease, and the sample size of each disease was small. Additionally, information about the dosage and duration of medication was insufficient.

The studies mentioned above did not reach a unanimous conclusion about biologics use in patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases. Biologics might increase the risk of severe COVID-19 and hospitalization in patients with skin diseases, which was not always the case. Interestingly, anti-TNF agents seemed to play a protective role in COVID-19, reducing the risk of hospitalization and ICU, ventilation or death. Anti-TNF agents could induce and maintain the remission of autoimmune disease and interfere with the pathway of cytokine storm. This might explain the results mentioned above.

Current data suggest that biologics (in addition to anti-TNF agents) do not influence mortality or hospitalization/ICU/ventilation rates. Biologics were proven to be of good efficacy and safety; thus, biologics therapy should not be stopped in patients with autoimmune diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. More evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-17, anti-integrin, anti-IL-12/23 and JAKi in patients with COVID-19.

According to the BSG and AGA, TNF antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-IL-12/23 and Janus kinase inhibitors should be initiated as monotherapy or continued as prescribed in patients with IBD without SARS-CoV-2 (29, 30). For patients with IBD infected by SARS-CoV-2, delaying biologics (including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, anti-integrin, and Janus kinase inhibitor) for 2 weeks was considered (29). The American College of Rheumatology and German Society of Rheumatology recommended that immunomodulators and biologics should be continued as prescribed in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases despite the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (32, 33). For patients with psoriasis, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) stated that there is currently insufficient evidence supporting the discontinuation of immunosuppressants in patients without COVID-19 infection. Patients with active COVID-19 infection should discontinue any immunosuppressive therapy (37, 38). In sum, decisions on biologics therapy should be made on an individual basis.

Possible Explanations for the Impact of Drug Usage on COVID-19

Corticosteroids

The impact of corticosteroids on the innate and adaptive immune systems was profound. The functions of lymphocytes (both T cells and B cells), mast cells, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, neutrophils, macrophages, and antigen presenting cells were all affected by corticosteroids. The mechanism by which corticosteroids affect the clinical course of COVID-19 is debatable. Corticosteroids downregulate the release of cytokines, in turn reducing the damage caused by cytokine storms. In the period of SARS-CoV-1, methylprednisolone was known to reduce IL-8, MCP-1, IP-10, IL-6, IFN-γ (Th1 response), and IL-4 (Th2 response) (39). Corticosteroids, however, also led to delayed viral clearance. Nelson et al. reported that early corticosteroid treatment was associated with a higher plasma viral load of SARS-CoV-1 (40).

Corticosteroids seemed to increase the risk of hospitalization and oxygen need among patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases. For the overall cohort of patients with COVID-19, some studies reported that corticosteroids reduced mortality among patients with COVID-19 (41, 42). One study reported prolonged virus clearance time and hospital stay, higher percentages of antibiotic therapy and severe disease associated with corticosteroids and no significant difference in mortality associated with corticosteroids (43). A meta-analysis of 7 randomized clinical trials conducted by REACT working group in Sep 2020 reported that corticosteroids could potentially reduce the 28-day all-cause mortality among patients with severe COVID-19 (44). The results of the meta-analysis were shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Table 2 The association between use of corticosteroids and 28-day all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19, according to meta-analysis by REACT working group.

It was considered that the ambiguous effect of corticosteroids might be partly due to the time window and dosage of corticosteroid use. Some studies reported reduced ICU/ventilation/death events among groups treated with early-phase corticosteroids (45, 46). However, the preliminary results of RECOVERY (NCT04381936) showing that in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, dexamethasone lowered 28-day mortality among patients under ventilation but not in those without oxygen need (47). However, data of RECOVERY was insufficient on domains like exclusion criteria, level of oxygen support and viral clearance. Additionally, most of patients did not receive remdesivir, an effective antiviral agent (48). Another trial, REMAP-CAP(NCT02735707), which focused on whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19, was halted early and did not reach a definitive conclusion (49). Another randomized clinical trial(NCT02517489) showed no significant change in the rate of death or persistent respiratory support when stopped early at 21 days (50). The CoDEX Randomized Clinical Trial(NCT04327401) reported that dexamethasone plus standard care increased the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation over 28 days among patients with moderate to severe ARDS and COVID-19 compared to standard care alone (6.6 days vs 4.0 days) (51). However, CoDEX was an open-label clinical trial and 35% of patients received corticosteroids during the study period. A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis reported that corticosteroid used for influenza is associated with higher risk of infection and mortality, however, confounding factors was thought to influence the results of studies (52). Nevertheless, more studies are needed to elucidate the role of corticosteroids in COVID-19.

Anti-TNF-α Agents

One explanation of the association between anti-TNF agents and a lower risk of ICU and death was that TNF-α played a part in the pathological process of COVID-19, including the promotion of Th1 cells and the induction of lymphocyte apoptosis, which led to a worse prognosis of COVID-19. Huang reported that ICU patients with COVID-19 had higher plasma levels of TNF-α than non-ICU patients (53). Experiments on rats demonstrated that etanercept or TNF-α depletion could reduce inflammatory cell infiltration, inflammatory cytokine secretion and inflammation-induced lung damage, in turn reducing the severity and mortality of RSV or H1N1 pneumonia (54, 55). An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating the role of adalimumab in treating severe COVID-19 pneumonia (56). Another underlying reason for the better prognosis associated with the usage of anti-TNF agents might be the therapeutic effect of anti-TNF agents for primary diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (57).

Previous studies demonstrated that TNF-α induced the production of glycosaminoglycans and collagen by pulmonary fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, which in turn led to pulmonary fibrosis (58). TNF-α along with IL-17A upregulated IL-8, which was released by the respiratory epithelium and led to focal neutrophilia that was associated with severe respiratory disease (59, 60).

These findings suggested that by inhibiting TNF-α, cytokine storms might be suppressed. Additionally, some experiments on animals showed that anti-TNF agents reduced inflammation-induced lung damage and mortality in rats with RSV or H1N1 pneumonia (54, 55). Anti-TNF agents are regarded as both recommended therapies for IBD and potential therapies for cytokine storms caused by COVID-19.

JAK Inhibitors

Tofacitinib, an effective oral JAK2/1/3 inhibitor, and baricitinib, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, were approved by the FDA for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ulcerative colitis(UC). Baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, inhibits gp130 family cytokines (such as IL-6, IL-12, IL-23, and IFN-γ). Baricitinib could also inhibit AP2-associated protein kinase 1 (AAK1), which is a regulator of endocytosis, and in turn interrupt the entry of the virus into cells (61). This makes baricitinib a promising therapy for COVID-19-related cytokine storms. Tofacitinib can effectively block IL-2, IL-7, and IL-6 but cannot inhibit AAK1. However, no studies have reported the protective role of tofacitinib against COVID-19. Evidence from cohort studies is still insufficient to determine whether JAK inhibitors could reduce the severity of COVID-19.

Anti-IL-17 Agents

The role of IL-17 in viral infection was intriguing and seemingly paradoxical, which might be due to the different roles of IL-17/IL-17R in different cells. On the one hand, IL-17 could enhance Th1 immune responses, promote cytotoxic T-cell activity, modulate antiviral B-cell activities, and induce protective inflammatory responses, thus hindering viral infections (62). On the other hand, IL-17 could also antagonize antiviral Th1 or cytotoxic lymphocytic responses, enhance the survival of virus-infected cells, and promote virus replication, which promotes viral infections (62). Moreover, a meta-analysis found a higher risk of respiratory tract infection in patients receiving anti-IL-17 agents compared to placebo (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.33) (63). However, there was no evidence of a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with anti-IL-17 agents. IL-17 could also contribute to the maintenance of tissue integrity, inhibit detrimental inflammation and mediate protective responses, and in turn limit viral infection-induced organ injury. However, IL-17A, along with TNF-α, stimulated the recruitment of neutrophils by inducing the release of IL-8, IL-6, IL-11, GM-CSF and G-CSF by respiratory epithelium, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts (64, 65). In this way, IL-17 also induces excessive neutrophil migration and activation, promotes fibrosis development, antagonizes the development of Treg cells and induces Th2 immune responses, which contribute to viral infection-induced tissue pathology. Overall, the impact of IL-17 on the outcome of COVID-19 is still unclear.

Immunomodulators

The commonly used immunomodulator methotrexate (MTX) can induce the apoptosis of activated T cells; downregulate the production of the proinflammatory factors TNF‐α, IL-6, and IL-8; and upregulate the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. By reducing INF‐γ and IL‐2, methotrexate inhibited the Th1 response (66). It seemed that methotrexate could inhibit the excessive immune response related to COVID-19, but there was still no clinical evidence.

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is a nonspecific antimetabolic drug that inhibits both humoral and cell-mediated immunity (67). Azathioprine (AZA) depresses the function of T cells, B cells, NK cells and antigen presenting cells (66). Cyclosporin A (CsA) reduced the production of IL-2 and INF‐γ and reduced the activity of NK cells (68). Cyclosporin A was reported to have broad-spectrum antiviral effects and to inhibit MERS-COV and SARS-COV replication in vitro (69). Pablo Guisado-Vasco et al. reported in Oct 2020 that among 607 patients with COVID-19, cyclosporine was associated with a significant decrease in mortality (OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.12-0.46; p<0·01) (70). However, evidence is still lacking for the role of CTX, AZA or CsA in COVID-19.

Thalidomide inhibits cyclooxygenase enzyme-2 (COX-2) and downregulates prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 (71). This indicates that thalidomide might be a potential therapy for COVID-19. Chen et al. reported a case of COVID-19 pneumonia recovered by thalidomide combined with low‐dose short‐term glucocorticoid (72). Two ongoing clinical trials (NCT04273581 and NCT04273529) explored the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in treating COVID disease.

There are still no cohort studies reporting the associations observed between immunomodulators (MTX, CsA, CTX, AZA, and thalidomide) and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Benefits and risks need to be carefully weighed before making decisions about immunomodulator use.

Summary

In this review, we summarized the impact of corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologics on the outcome of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases. Current data from retrospective cohorts suggested that systemic corticosteroids, especially at higher dosages, were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, ventilation and higher mortality, which was based on multivariate analysis regarding age, gender, comorbidities and diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. In some cohorts, anti-TNF agents were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, ventilation and death. No statistically significant difference in hospitalization/ICU/ventilation/mortality rate was observed between patients receiving immunomodulators (e.g., MTX, AZA) or biologics apart from anti-TNF agents (anti-integrin, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, JAKi) and those who did not.

As the clinical data of COVID-19 combined with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are still insufficient and scattered, it is difficult to draw convincing conclusions. First, the sample size of studies included in this review was limited, and might not be sufficient to draw a strong conclusion. Second, the severity of inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or other rheumatic diseases, and concomitant antibiotics were not analyzed in these studies, which was considered as confounding factors. Strong evidence is needed to prove the impact of corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologics on the clinical course of COVID-19 and guide the clinical application of drugs during the pandemic.

Author Contributions

MZ, XB, WC, and HY conducted the serach and selection of related published articles. MZ, XB, and JJ participated in reading the articles and retrieving data. WC, LW YY, and HY gave comments and guide modification of contents. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Fund (81970495, 81570505), Beijing Natural Science Fund (7202161), and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (2016-I2M-3-001, 2019-I2M-2-007). The funding source had no involvement in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Shiyu Jiang, Yangzhong Zhou, Weijia Wang and Hongnan Zhen for their excellent suggestions.

References

1. Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Blanchard JF. The Clustering of Other Chronic Inflammatory Diseases in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-Based Study. Gastroenterology (2005) 129(3):827–36. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yates VM, Watkinson G, Kelman A. Further Evidence for an Association Between Psoriasis, Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Br J Dermatol (1982) 106(3):323–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb01731.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Karreman MC, Luime JJ, Hazes JMW, Weel AEAM. The Prevalence and Incidence of Axial and Peripheral Spondyloarthritis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Crohn’s Colitis (2016) 11(5):631–42.

Google Scholar

4. Thjodleifsson B, Geirsson AJ, Björnsson S, Bjarnason I. A Common Genetic Background for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Genealogic Study in Iceland. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 56(8):2633–9. doi: 10.1002/art.22812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Egeberg A, Mallbris L, Warren RB, Bachelez H, Gislason GH, Hansen PR, et al. Association Between Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. Br J Dermatol (2016) 175(3):487–92. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ellinghaus D, Ellinghaus E, Nair RP, Stuart PE, Esko T, Metspalu A, et al. Combined Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies for Crohn Disease and Psoriasis Identifies Seven Shared Susceptibility Loci. Am J Hum Genet (2012) 90(4):636–47.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Nair RP, Ruether A, Stuart PE, Jenisch S, Tejasvi T, Hiremagalore R, et al. Polymorphisms of the IL12B and IL23R Genes are Associated With Psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol (2008) 128(7):1653–61. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cargill M, Schrodi SJ, Chang M, Garcia VE, Brandon R, Callis KP, et al. A Large-Scale Genetic Association Study Confirms IL12B and Leads to the Identification of IL23R as Psoriasis-Risk Genes. Am J Hum Genet (2007) 80(2):273–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

9. International Genetics of Ankylosing Spondylitis C, Cortes A, Hadler J, Pointon JP, Robinson PC, Karaderi T, et al. Identification of Multiple Risk Variants for Ankylosing Spondylitis Through High-Density Genotyping of Immune-Related Loci. Nat Genet (2013) 45(7):730–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Akiyama S, Hamdeh S, Micic D, Sakuraba A. Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients With Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) annrheumdis–2020-218946. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219394

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jutzeler CR, Bourguignon L, Weis CV, Tong B, Wong C, Rieck B, et al. Comorbidities, Clinical Signs and Symptoms, Laboratory Findings, Imaging Features, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis (2020) 37:101825–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rivellese F, Prediletto E. ACE2 at the Centre of COVID-19 From Paucisymptomatic Infections to Severe Pneumonia. Autoimmun Rev (2020) 19(6):102536. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Donoghue M, Hsieh F, Baronas E, Godbout K, Gosselin M, Stagliano N, et al. A Novel Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme–Related Carboxypeptidase (Ace2) Converts Angiotensin I to Angiotensin 1-9. Circ Res (2000) 87(5):e1–9. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.87.5.e1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wang K, Chen W, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Lian JQ, Du P, et al. Sars-CoV-2 Invades Host Cells Via a Novel Route: CD147-spike Protein. bioRxiv (2020) 2020.03.14.988345.

Google Scholar

15. Jamilloux Y, Henry T, Belot A, Viel S, Fauter M, El Jammal T, et al. Should We Stimulate or Suppress Immune Responses in COVID-19? Cytokine and Anti-Cytokine Interventions. Autoimmun Rev (2020) 19(7):102567. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Diao B, Wang C, Tan Y, Chen X, Liu Y, Ning L, et al. Reduction and Functional Exhaustion of T Cells in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19). Front Immunol (2020) 11:827. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gupta S. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Induced Apoptosis in T Cells From Aged Humans: A Role of TNFR-I and Downstream Signaling Molecules. Exp Gerontol (2002) 37(2-3):293–9. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00195-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med (2020) 180(7):1–11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Allocca M, Guidelli GM, Borroni RG, Selmi C, Narcisi A, Danese S, et al. Clinical Course of COVID-19 in 41 Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Experience From Humanitas Center, Milan. Pharmacol Res (2020) 160:105061. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gianfrancesco M, Hyrich KL, Al–Adely S, Carmona L, Danila MI, Gossec L, et al. Characteristics Associated With Hospitalisation for COVID-19 in People With Rheumatic Disease: Data From the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Physician-Reported Registry. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) 79(7):859–66.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, Gianfrancesco MA, Lawson–Tovey S, Liew JW, Ljung L, et al. Factors Associated With COVID-19-related Death in People With Rheumatic Diseases: Results From the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Physician-Reported Registry. Ann Rheum Dis (2021) 80(7):annrheumdis–2020-219498.

Google Scholar

22. contributors, F.R.S.S.S.C.I.c.a. contributors. Severity of COVID-19 and Survival in Patients With Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases: Data From the French Rmd COVID-19 Cohort of 694 Patients. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) 80(4):527–38.

Google Scholar

23. Veenstra J, Buechler CR, Robinson G, Chapman S, Adelman M, Tisack A, et al. Antecedent Immunosuppressive Therapy for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in the Setting of a COVID-19 Outbreak. J Am Acad Dermatol (2020) 83(6):1696–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Haberman R, Axelrad J, Chen A, Castillo R, Yan D, Izmirly P, et al. Covid-19 in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases - Case Series From New York. N Engl J Med (2020) 383(1):85–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Allocca M, Chaparro M, Gonzalez HA, Bosca–Watts MM, Palmela C, D'Amico F, et al. Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease are Not at Increased Risk of COVID-19: A Large Multinational Cohort Study. J Clin Med (2020) 9(11):3533. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113533

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Marques CDL, Kakehasi AM, Pinheiro MM, Mota LMH, Albuquerque CP, Silva CR, et al. High Levels of Immunosuppression are Related to Unfavourable Outcomes in Hospitalised Patients With Rheumatic Diseases and COVID-19: First Results of ReumaCoV Brasil Registry. RMD Open (2021) 7(1):e001461. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001461corr1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Brenner EJ UR, Colombel JF, Kappelman MD. Secure-Ibd Database Public Data Update. Covidibd.Org (Accessed 12/29/20).

Google Scholar

28. Singh AK, Jena A, Kumar–M P, Sharma V, Sebastian S. Risk and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. U Eur Gastroenterol J (2021) 0(0):2050640620972602.

Google Scholar

29. Kennedy NA, Jones G-R, Lamb CA, Appleby R, Arnott I, Beattie RM, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology Guidance for Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gut (2020) 69(6):984–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Rubin DT, Feuerstein JD, Wang AY, Cohen RD. Aga Clinical Practice Update on Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Expert Commentary. Gastroenterology (2020) 159(1):S0016–5085(20)30482-0.

Google Scholar

31. Rubin DT, Abreu MT, Rai V, Siegel CA, International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel D. Management of Patients With Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an International Meeting. Gastroenterology (2020) 159(1):S0016–5085(20)30465-0.

Google Scholar

32. Schulze–Koops H, Specker C, Iking–Konert C, Holle J, Moosig K, Krueger K. Preliminary Recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology (Dgrh eV) for the Management of Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases During the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) 79(6):840–2. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mikuls TR, Johnson SR, Fraenkel L, Arasaratnam RJ, Baden LR, Bermas BR, et al. American College of Rheumatology Guidance for the Management of Rheumatic Disease in Adult Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Version 1. Arthritis Rheumatol (2020) 72(8):1241–51.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Damiani G, Pacifico A, Bragazzi NL, Malagoli P. Biologics Increase the Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Hospitalization, But Not ICU Admission and Death: Real-life Data From a Large Cohort During Red-Zone Declaration. Dermatol Ther (2020) p:e13475.

Google Scholar

35. Gisondi P, Facheris P, Dapavo P, Piaserico S, Conti A, Naldi L, et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Being Treated With Biological Therapy: The Northern Italy Experience. Br J Dermatol (2020) 183(2):10.1111/bjd.19158.

Google Scholar

36. Cho SI, Kim YE, Jo SJ. Association of COVID-19 With Skin Diseases and Relevant Biologics: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Nationwide Claim Data in South Korea. Br J Dermatol (2021) 184:296–303.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

37. Coronavirus Concerns? NPF Medical Board COVID-19 Recommendations for Patients With Psoriatic Disease (Accessed March 20th, N.P.F.).

Google Scholar

38. Guidance on the Use of Biologic Agents During COVID-19 Outbreak (Accessed March 18, A.A.o.D.).

Google Scholar

39. Lam CW, Chan MH, Wong CK. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Manifestations. Clin Biochem Rev (2004) 25(2):121–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Lee N, Allen Chan KC, Hui DS, Ng EK, Wu A, Chiu RW, et al. Effects of Early Corticosteroid Treatment on Plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA Concentrations in Adult Patients. J Clin Virol (2004) 31(4):304–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Fernández-Cruz A, Ruiz–Antorán B, Muñoz–Gómez A, Sancho–López A, Mills–Sánchez P, Centeno–Soto GA, et al. A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study of the Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2020) 64(9):e01168–20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01168-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia JA, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Internal Med (2020) 180(7):1–11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Li Q, Li W, Jin Y, Xu W, Huang C, Li L, et al. Efficacy Evaluation of Early, Low-Dose, Short-Term Corticosteroids in Adults Hospitalized With Non-Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Infect Dis Ther (2020) 9(4):823–36. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00332-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Group, T.W.R.E.A.f.C.-T.W. Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Covid-19: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA (2020) 324(13):1330–41.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Li Y, Zhou X, Li T, Chan S, Yu Y, Ai J-W, et al. Corticosteroid Prevents COVID-19 Progression Within its Therapeutic Window: A Multicentre, Proof-of-Concept, Observational Study. Emerg Microbes Infect (2020) 9(1):1869–77. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1807885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Fadel R, Morrison AR, Vahia A, Smith ZR, Chaudhry Z, Bhargava P, et al. Early Short-Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized Patients With Covid-19. Clin Infect Dis (2020) 71(16):2114–20. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.04.20074609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Group RC, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients With Covid-19 — Preliminary Report. New Engl J Med (2020) 384(8):693–704.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

48. Matthay MA, Thompson BT. Dexamethasone in Hospitalised Patients With COVID-19: Addressing Uncertainties. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(12):1170–2. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30503-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Angus DC, Derde L, Al-Beidh F, Annane D, Arabi Y, Beane A, et al. Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe Covid-19: The Remap-Cap COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA (2020) 324(13):1317–29.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. Dequin P-F, Heming N, Meziani F, Plantefève G, Voiriot G, Badiè J, et al. Effect of Hydrocortisone on 21-Day Mortality or Respiratory Support Among Critically Ill Patients With Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA (2020) 324(13):1298–306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Tomazini BM, Maia IS, Cavalcanti AB, Berwanger O, Rosa RG, Veiga VC, et al. Effect of Dexamethasone on Days Alive and Ventilator-Free in Patients With Moderate or Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19: The CoDEX Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA (2020) 324(13):1307–16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Lansbury LE, Rodrigo C, Leonardi–Bee J, Nguyen–Van–Tam J, Shen Lim W. Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Influenza: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med (2020) 48(2):e98–106. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Features of Patients Infected With 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet (2020) 395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hussell T, Pennycook A, Openshaw PJM. Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor Reduces the Severity of Virus-Specific Lung Immunopathology. Eur J Immunol (2001) 31(9):2566–73. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200109)31:9<2566::AID-IMMU2566>3.0.CO;2-L

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Shi X, Zhou W, Huang H, Zhu H, Zhou P, Zhu H, et al. Inhibition of the Inflammatory Cytokine Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha With Etanercept Provides Protection Against Lethal H1N1 Influenza Infection in Mice. Crit Care (London England) (2013) 17(6):R301–1. doi: 10.1186/cc13171

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. A Randomized, O.-L., Controlled Trial for the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) Shanghai, China: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: Chictr2000030089 (2020). Available at: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=49889.

Google Scholar

57. Cholapranee A, Hazlewood GS, Kaplan GG, Peyrin–Biroulet L, Ananthakrishnan AN. Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis: Comparative Efficacy of Biologics for Induction and Maintenance of Mucosal Healing in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Controlled Trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2017) 45(10):1291–302. doi: 10.1111/apt.14030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Bradley LM, Douglass MF, Chatterjee D, Akira S, Baaten BJ. Matrix Metalloprotease 9 Mediates Neutrophil Migration Into the Airways in Response to Influenza Virus-Induced Toll-Like Receptor Signaling. PloS Pathog (2012) 8(4):e1002641. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kunkel SL, Standiford T, Kasahara K, Strieter RM. Interleukin-8 (Il-8): The Major Neutrophil Chemotactic Factor in the Lung. Exp Lung Res (1991) 17(1):17–23. doi: 10.3109/01902149109063278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Saltos N. Heterogeneity of Airway Inflammation in Persistent Asthma: Evidence of Neutrophilic Inflammation and Increased Sputum Interleukin-8. Chest (2001) 119(5):1329–36. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.5.1329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, Smith D, Oechsle O, Phelan A, et al. Baricitinib as Potential Treatment for 2019-nCoV Acute Respiratory Disease. Lancet (2020) 395(10223):e30–1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Ma W-T, Yao X-T, Peng Q, Chen D-K. The Protective and Pathogenic Roles of IL-17 in Viral Infections: Friend or Foe? Open Biol (2019) 9(7):190109–9. doi: 10.1098/rsob.190109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Wan MT, Shin DB, Winthrop KL, Gelfand JM. The Risk of Respiratory Tract Infections and Symptoms in Psoriasis Patients Treated With Interleukin 17 Pathway–Inhibiting Biologics: A Meta-Estimate of Pivotal Trials Relevant to Decision Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol (2020) 83(2):677–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Lindén A, Laan M, Anderson GP. Neutrophils, interleukin-17A and Lung Disease. Eur Respir J (2005) 25(1):159–72. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00032904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Lindén A. Interleukin-17 and Airway Remodelling. Pulm Pharmacol Ther (2006) 19(1):47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Sekhri R SV, Sardana K. Immunosuppressive Drugs. In: Sardana K, editor. Systemic Drugs in Dermatology. New Delhi, India: Jaypee (2016). p. 304–85.

Google Scholar

67. Moore MJ. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Cyclophosphamide. Clin Pharmacokinet (1991) 20(3):194–208. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199120030-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kim JH, Perfect JR. Infection and Cyclosporine. Rev Infect Dis (1989) 11(5):677–90. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.5.677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. de Wilde AH, Pham U, Posthuma CC, Snijder EJ. Cyclophilins and Cyclophilin Inhibitors in Nidovirus Replication. Virology (2018) 522:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.06.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Guisado-Vasco P, Valderas–Ortega S, Carralón–González MM, Roda–Santacruz A, González–Cortijo L, Sotres–Fernández G, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Hospitalized Adults With Severe COVID-19 Admitted to a Tertiary Medical Center and Receiving Antiviral, Antimalarials, Glucocorticoids, or Immunomodulation With Tocilizumab or Cyclosporine: A Retrospective Observational Study (COQUIMA Cohort). EClinicalMedicine (2020) 28:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Paravar T, Lee DJ. Thalidomide: Mechanisms of Action. Int Rev Immunol (2008) 27(3):111–35. doi: 10.1080/08830180801911339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Chen C, Qi F, Shi K, Li Y, Li J, Chen Y, et al. Thalidomide Combined With Low-Dose Short-Term Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin Trans Med (2020) 10(2):e35. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.35

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar