Chiel van Geffen
Astrid Deißler1,2
Markus Quante
Harald Renz
Dominik Hartl
Saeed Kolahian- 1Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 2Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 3Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, Molecular Diagnostics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- 4Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
- 5Department of Pediatrics I, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 6Dominik Hartl, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
The immune system is receiving increasing attention for interstitial lung diseases, as knowledge on its role in fibrosis development and response to therapies is expanding. Uncontrolled immune responses and unbalanced injury-inflammation-repair processes drive the initiation and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The regulatory immune system plays important roles in controlling pathogenic immune responses, regulating inflammation and modulating the transition of inflammation to fibrosis. This review aims to summarize and critically discuss the current knowledge on the potential role of regulatory immune cells, including mesenchymal stromal/stem cells, regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, we review the emerging role of regulatory immune cells in anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplantation. A comprehensive understanding of immune regulation could pave the way towards new therapeutic or preventive approaches in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Introduction
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a chronic lung disease characterized by progressive fibrotic tissue remodeling and scarring of lung tissue (1). Various factors, such as smoking, chronic aspiration due to gastroesophageal reflux, infections, toxins, radiation, autoimmune reactions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, Sjögren’s syndrome or systemic lupus erythematosus) and exposure to environmental pollutants can trigger chronic lung tissue damage resulting in fibrotic remodeling (2–6). However, PF can also occur without an identifiable underlying cause, known as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). IPF is an age-related interstitial lung disease, affecting mainly patients of 50 years and older with an incidence of 2.8–18 per 100,000 people and a prevalence of 1.25–27.9 per 100,000 people in Europe and North America (3). Unfortunately, IPF patients have a poor prognosis with a median survival of 2-4 years after diagnosis (3). A gain-of-function mutation in the MUC5B gene represents the highest genetic risk factor for the development of IPF (3). IPF is difficult to treat with pharmacological therapies and to date, the only effective curative therapy for IPF patients is lung transplantation (3).
Chronic alveolar-micro injuries presumably lead to a maintained and dysregulated wound healing process, which drives IPF (3). Fibrogenesis is marked by a massive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) produced by myofibroblasts such as collagen, elastin, laminin, fibronectin, hyaluronan and glycoproteins, resulting in irreversible thickening of alveolar walls, compromising the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide between blood and alveolar air (7, 8). At the cellular level, repeating lung injuries mostly affect type I alveolar epithelial cells (AECs), which mainly form the alveolar surface. In response to this cell loss, type II AECs proliferate in a hyperplastic manner to mask the exposed basement membrane (2). Under healthy conditions, the cells would differentiate into type I AECs and hyperplastic type II AECs would undergo apoptosis (2). However, under the influence of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, hyperplastic type II AECs remain at the alveolar surface resulting in alveolar collapse (2). Fibroblasts are the most frequent cell type in fibrotic tissues that produce ECM-producing cells which are recruited into the lung compartment (2). Fibroblasts differentiate into contractile myofibroblasts with massive ECM productive capacity (2). Cytokines and growth factors activating fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and inducing further fibrotic tissue remodeling include TGF-β, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-13, IL-33, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and leukotrienes (7). Activated fibroblasts produce TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-33, reactive oxygen species, C-X-C motif chemokines (CXC), C-C motif chemokines (CC) maintaining fibrogenesis and attracting immune cells to promote chronic inflammation, resulting in a positive feedback loop supporting fibrogenesis through differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts (7). TGF-β itself contributes to fibrosis progression via TGF-β/SMAD signaling by stimulation of ECM production, inhibition of ECM breakdown through matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) induction (9).
Cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system such as mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), regulatory B cells (Bregs), macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have been linked to the pathogenesis of IPF, often with contradicting findings (Figure 1) (10–14). Immunomodulation by regulatory immune cells is crucial in dampening pathogenic immune responses and inhibiting the transition from inflammation to fibrosis. Identifying the role of regulatory immune cells in IPF is therefore key in understanding the imbalanced immune responses underlying IPF. In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the role of regulatory immune cells in IPF, and assess their interaction with current pharmacological therapies and lung transplantation in IPF.
Figure 1 Direct effects of regulatory immune cells on (myo)fibroblasts and extracellular matrix (ECM) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Repeated tissue injury triggering chronic tissue damage resulting in inflammation, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and ultimately in excessive production and buildup of ECM by fibrocytes and (myo)fibroblasts (fibrosis) in the lungs, represents the main paradigm involved in the pathology of IPF. Immune cells with regulatory functions modulate (myo)fibroblast generation, (myo)fibroblast function and ECM homeostasis through various signaling pathways, and known direct pathways are listed here. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) promote (myo)fibroblasts through fibroblast growth factor (FGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interleukin (IL)-1β, while MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-ECV) and stanniocalcin (SC)-1 have opposite effects. MSCs are also prone to myofibroblastic transition. Tregs promote fibrogenesis through TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B and IL-1β, while inhibiting the recruitment of fibrocytes by inhibition of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis as well as FGF-9. Macrophages enhance fibrosis through TGF-β, PDGF, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, fibronectin (FN) and inhibit fibroblasts via itaconate and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ligands. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory B cells (Bregs) have been suggested to activate lung fibroblasts, possibly through TGF-β. Bregs inhibit autoreactive immunoglobulins, which may deposit in lung tissue and promote inflammation and IPF. Dendritic cells (DCs) have been shown to produce pro-fibrotic TGF-β and IL-1β. Macrophages (Macs) as well as DCs break down the ECM via matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a process that is inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) produced by other macrophage subtypes. Both Macs and DCs have been found to produce fibronectin (FN), another ECM component. Blue lines represent the direct effects of regulatory immune cells on (myo)fibroblasts and ECM in IPF. Dashed lines represent interactions that are not firmly established in IPF. This figure was created using Servier Medical Art templates, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com.
Regulatory Immune Cells in IPF
Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells
MSCs are multipotent stem cells that can differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, myocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells (15). Furthermore, MSCs play an important role in modulating immunity (16). MSC phenotype and function are dependent on environmental cues (17). Lung-resident (LR)-MSCs have been proposed to play a role in lung regeneration. The expression of high levels of telomerase by LR-MSCs provides self-renewal, survival and replication capacity which may promote lung regeneration by repopulating structural lung cells (17). LR-MSCs have also been suggested to play an important role in IPF. Several profibrotic factors, as mentioned above, have been found to induce myofibroblastic transition (MFT) of MSCs, which in turn promotes collagen production and ECM accumulation driving PF (17–21). Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (BPF) in mice resulted in the loss of LR-MSCs, likely due to MFT induced by the upregulation of previously mentioned profibrotic factors (22). Inhibition of the underlying signals mediating MFT, such as Hedgehog, Wnt/β-catenin, Shh/Gli – Wnt or nuclear factor (NF) - κB signaling, were shown to reduce myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs and attenuated BPF in mice (18, 23–25). Dysregulations in these pathways have been found to modulate TGF-β, MMPs, ECM production and EMT (9, 26). Manipulating the MFT of LR-MSCs by regulating microRNA-497 expression understated their detrimental effect in BPF (27). The expression and activity of collagen prolyl hydroxylase, an enzyme crucial for collagen synthesis, by fibrotic lung mesenchymal cells was observed to be one of the mechanisms underlying the TGF-β-mediated profibrotic effects (28). Suppression of collagen prolyl hydroxylase by pyridine-2,5-dicarboxylate attenuated TGF-β-mediated collagen production in both cultured fibroblasts as well as in BPF (28). Promotion of REVERBα, a transcriptional repressor that is upregulated in IPF, has been shown to inhibit both myofibroblast differentiation and collagen secretion in organotypic cultures from IPF patients (29).
In contrast, there is an increasing scientific interest in MSCs due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects (15) as well as an increasing amount of evidence showing anti-fibrotic effects of MSCs in rodents. MSC therapy in BPF models in rodents showed reductions in lung collagen deposition (22, 30–43), lung fibrosis (22, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38), TGF-β levels (22, 30–36, 38–41) and total and/or neutrophil cell count in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (34, 36, 37, 39) and improved 14-day survival (22, 34, 36) after bleomycin administration. A large body of research is focused on MSC therapies in a variety of human diseases, including graft versus host disease (GVHD), autoimmune disorders, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma (44) as well as in novel diseases like COVID-19 (45, 46). Autologous or allogeneic MSCs are harvested from the peripheral blood, adipose tissue, bone marrow, umbilical cord, placenta, dental pulp, synovial fluid, endometrium, skin or muscle. Due to low numbers, harvested MSCs are usually expanded in vitro in culture medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum, before being transferred to patients (44). The use of MSC-derived products, such as MSC-derived vesicles and exosomes were also reported (47).
At the time of writing, there are five clinical trials using MSC therapy to treat IPF, as registered on the National Institute of Health (NIH) clinical trial database (48)1. A phase Ib clinical trial, completed in 2015, studied the intravenous administration of 1 to 2*106 MSC/kg allogeneic placenta-derived MSCs in patients with moderately severe IPF (NCT01385644) (49). The phase I AETHER trial, completed in 2016, studied the administration of a single intravenous infusion of 20, 100, or 200*106 allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs in patients with mild-to-moderate IPF (NCT02013700) (50). Another phase I clinical trial, completed in 2018, studied the safety and feasibility of endobronchial administrated autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs in patients with mild-to-moderate IPF (NCT01919827). An uncompleted phase I/II clinical trial that planned to study adipose-derived MSCs in IPF has not recently been updated on its status (NCT02135380). Finally, a phase I/II clinical trial, completed in 2018, studied the intravenous administration of two doses of 2*108 allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs every 3 months for a total of 1.6*109 MSCs in patients with moderate-to-severe IPF (NCT02594839) (51). Another phase Ib clinical trial studied the safety of 1.5*106 autologous adipose-derived MSCs-stromal vascular fraction/kg infused into the lungs of patients with mild-to-moderate IPF at monthly intervals (52). Four of the completed clinical trials published their results showing that MSC therapy is a safe, feasible and promising method to treat IPF patients (49–52). However, more clinical trials are necessary to prove the efficacy of MSC therapy in IPF patients. Due to the urgency and severity of many diseases, including IPF, there are many reports of unapproved stem cell therapies being used, often due to a lack of regulation (53, 54). There remain key challenges in MSC therapy, such as identifying the most valuable source of MSCs, the ideal donors and recipients and the most effective handling and administration routes. Other challenges are in identifying during which stages of IPF patients are most susceptible to MSC therapy as well as possible interactions with pharmaceuticals.
Beneficial effects of MSC therapy in IPF have been suggested to be modulated by MSCs promoting alveolar repair by the secretion of growth factors (55), suppressing inflammation by the production of nitric oxide (NO) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (56), promotion of Treg expansion (57), decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-2 by secreting IL-10 and soluble IL-1β receptor (56) and by protecting lung injury by restituting alveolar bioenergetics through mediating mitochondrial transfer (58). Other observed anti-fibrotic pathways were the production of stanniocalcin-1 which is shown to dampen BPF in mice (41), MSC-derived extracellular vesicles which were found to suppress TGF-β1-induced MFT (47, 59, 60), and MSCs ability to differentiate into type II lung cells expressing surfactant (60). MSCs are also immunoprivileged, lacking human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II combined with low HLA class I expression, allowing the administration to immunocompetent patients without the need for further immunosuppression (61). However, transferred MSCs have been shown to secrete pro-fibrotic TGF-β1 and underwent MFT in BPF in mice (57). In contrast, MSCs secreting higher levels of TGF-β1 have been suggested to have optimal anti-fibrotic efficacy in BPF in mice (57).
Recent evidence suggests an increase in senescent bone marrow-derived (BM-) MSCs (expressing the senescence markers p21, p16INK4A, p53 and senescence-associated β-galactosidase) in IPF patients contribute to disease progression (62, 63). Accumulation of DNA damage in senescent IPF BM-MSCs resulted in decreased mitochondrial and cellular function (62). These findings are in line with the observed decrease in migration capacity and reduced anti-fibrotic effects of BM-MSCs derived from IPF patients, which were adoptively transferred in BPF mice (62). Administrated MSCs derived from older mice were found to be less successful in ameliorating BPF compared to those derived from younger rodents, supporting the contribution of MSC senescence (64). DNA protein kinase catalytic subunits, involved in DNA repair mechanisms, were found to be reduced in IPF lung tissue, which was suggested to result in the expansion of stage-specific embryonic antigen-4+ mesenchymal progenitors, and the senescence of mesenchymal progeny (63). The possible involvement of senescent MSCs in IPF disease progression may be correlated with age being the most important risk factor (62).
Taken together, literature suggests that an increase in MFT of LR-MSCs as well as an increase in MSC senescence are detrimental to IPF progression. However, the immune regulatory role of MSC has been linked with beneficial effects in IPF, and, as evidenced by the positive findings of studies investigating MSC therapy, seem to provide promising treatment strategies.
Regulatory T cells
Tregs have been found crucial in modulating immunity and maintaining immune tolerance, but their role in IPF remains contradicting and unclearly defined (65, 66). Activated CD4+ T cells (67–69) as well as Tregs (70–73) were found to be upregulated in the peripheral blood of IPF patients and positively correlated with disease severity (67, 68, 70, 71, 73). Tregs were recruited to the lungs of murine models of PF (74, 75). In contrast, several studies observed reduced Treg numbers with reduced suppressive functions in the peripheral blood and BALF of IPF patients correlating to disease severity (76, 77).
Tregs have been suggested to be able to protect from TGF-β1-induced fibrosis via the release of IL-10, as Th1 cells exposed to TGF-β1 produce IL-10 (78). TGF-1β was shown to ameliorate BPF in wild-type mice, but not in IL-10-deficient mice (78). IL-10 also has been found to down-regulate type I collagen synthesis in human scar tissue-derived fibroblasts (79) and protect against BPF (80). However, TGF-β1 may also mediate the potential negative role that Tregs play in IPF (81). Tregs have been shown to increase collagen deposition through TGF-β1 in fibroblasts (82) and in lymphatic tissue (83) as well as in the lungs (74) of mice. TGF-β1 autocrine signaling in Tregs was also shown to induce secretion of pro-fibrotic PDGF-B in non-inflammatory conditions (74). Early depletion of Tregs indeed reduced TGF-β levels and lung fibrosis in BPF in mice (81). Semaphorin 7A is an immunomodulating protein involved in many processes such as monocyte chemotaxis (84) and DC migration (85). Adoptive transfer of semaphorin 7A-positive Tregs was found to exaggerate TGF-β1-induced lung fibrosis in TGF-β1-transgenic mice (70). However, the regulation of TGF-β1 levels is not limited to Tregs, confirmed by the finding that reduced Tregs and Foxp3 expression in mice lacking phosphatase and tensin homolog (an antagonist of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, which mediate myeloid effector function) was combined with a massive upregulation of TGF-β1 in the lungs (86).
The importance of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in IPF has previously been described, and is thought to contribute to fibrosis through recruitment and modulation of fibrocytes (77, 87, 88). Fibrocytes are cells expressing CD45, collagen-1 and CXCR4, exhibit pro-inflammatory and ECM-remodeling properties and share key features with fibroblasts (89, 90). Indeed, the recruitment of CXCR4+ fibrocytes to the lungs of IPF patients was confirmed and blockage of CXCR4 ameliorated BPF in mice (87, 88). Tregs were found to decrease CXCL12 expression and may therefore play a key role in reducing fibrocyte recruitment (91). Similarly, Tregs have been found to inhibit fibrocyte recruitment via suppression of FGF-9 (92).
Another pathway by which Tregs may influence IPF progression is by mediating the balance between T helper (Th) 1, Th2, and Th17 responses. Th1 cells were shown to exhibit anti-fibrotic effects through the production of IFN-γ and IL-12 (93), and IFN-γ production by T cells was found to be suppressed by Tregs (94). Th2 immune responses were shown to stimulate myofibroblasts and the progression of the disease through the production of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IL-17A (95, 96). In radiation-induced lung disease in mice, an increase in Th17 was linked to enhanced lung fibrosis, while an increase in Th1 was found to have the opposite effect (97). The downregulation and depletion of Tregs as well as the neutralization of Treg-immunosuppressive activity has been shown to switch Th2-driven responses to Th1-driven responses (74, 98, 99) and attenuated PF progression in a silica-induced (99) as well as in an irradiation-induced murine model (100). Tregs were suggested to promote Th17 through TGF-β and IL-1β (100, 101). However, Th17 cells were found to be decreased in the peripheral blood (while Tregs were found upregulated) resulting in increased TGF-β/IL-17 ratio in IPF patients (72). Adoptive transfer of Tregs into recombination activating gene (Rag) 2 protein-deficient mice (lacking lymphocytes) was found to promote BPF progression and a loss of Foxp3 expression after transfer (10, 102). These findings suggest Tregs might lose their suppressor ability and adopt a Th2 phenotype through which they may promote disease progression (10, 102). In contrast, pro-inflammatory CD4+CD28null helper T cells were found to be upregulated in IPF and were found to be unresponsive to Treg immunomodulation (103).
Treg expansion using IL-2 therapies was shown successful in treating diseases like vasculitis and GVHD (104, 105). Soluble IL-2 complexed to an IL-2 receptor neutralizing antibody allows for hyperstimulation of CD25 (IL-2 receptor alpha chain) by depleting the IL-2 receptor, which in turn promotes Treg expansion. Administration of IL-2 complex in a mouse model of BPF was found to exacerbate PF by increasing collagen deposition as well as inducing lung remodeling (102). The immune response was found to be switched from a Th1 to a Th2 response, while TGF-β production remained unaltered (102).
The adoptive transfer of Tregs did show positive effects in mice models of acute lung injury (91, 106). Adoptive transfer of Tregs was observed to reduce delayed lung recovery in Rag1-/- mice (lacking mature T and B cells) (106) as well as fibroproliferation (91) in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Interestingly, while early depletion of Tregs was found to reduce lung fibrosis and TGF-β1 expression in BPF in mice, late depletion of Tregs showed opposite effects (81). Late stage (after 21 days) increase of Tregs in BPF in CC receptor (CCR) 7 (receptor involved in B and T cell activation, T cell homing and DC maturation) deficient mice showed a positive suppressive effect of Tregs in IPF as well (107). These results suggest several translational limitations relating to animal models of PF that likely resulted in several contradicting results regarding the role of Tregs in IPF (10). Commonly used animal models, such as BPF, are not specific to IPF and rather poorly replicate the core characteristics of the disease, such as the slow development and its irreversible nature. Combined with the already existing gap between animals and humans, as well as the complexity of Tregs, it further complicates translation to the clinical setting.
Literature on the role of Tregs in IPF is often contradictory and the explanation to this phenomenon may be hiding in several factors (10). First of all, the phase of IPF progression appears to be of vital importance when assessing the role of Tregs. Second, there seems to be a high likelihood of discrepancies in the number of Tregs found in the periphery (i.e. the blood) versus the number of Tregs observed in the lungs. Third, there are translational limitations relating to animal models of IPF. Combined with the diverse role of Tregs, it is reasonable to assume these factors contributed to the contradicting observations regarding their role in IPF. All in all, Tregs appear to be both friend and foe in relation to IPF, which suggests that Treg modulation requires careful assessment of the phase of IPF disease state.
Regulatory B Cells
B cells mediate the humoral immunity of the adaptive immune system by secreting antibodies (as plasma cells), and mediate immunity by functioning as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and by producing cytokines (108). The amount of circulating B cells in the peripheral blood (109, 110) and B cells in the lungs (110–114) of IPF patients were found to be increased together with CXCL 13 (a critical chemokine for the homing of B cells) (115, 116), correlating with disease progression. Similarly, there was an increase in IL-6, IL-13 and B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) (all factors that promote B cells) found in IPF patients (110). Rag1-/- mice as well as gp130(757F);uMT-/- compound mutant mice (deprived of mature B cells) were protected from BPF, suggesting a negative role of B cells in IPF progression (117).
Bregs, however, have been shown to dampen T-cell driven immune responses, to support immunological tolerance, and have been shown to produce anti-inflammatory IL-10 and TGF-β (118). A loss of Bregs in both allergic and autoimmune diseases was found to exacerbate disease progression (119). Decreased numbers of Bregs were found in IPF patients, as well as an increase in the proliferation and activation of T follicular helper (Tfh) cells (12). Tfh cells are a specialized Th cell subset that assist B cells by the secretion of IL-4, IL-10 and IL-21 and CD40 ligand expression, which promotes the growth, differentiation and initiates class switching of B cells as well as induce antigen-specific antibody responses (120). Bregs were shown to suppress Tfh-cell maturation and inhibit Tfh cell-mediated antibody secretion (121). Increases of circulating antigen differentiated B cells (110), plasmablasts (110), autoreactive immunoglobulin (Ig) A in the lungs (109), Ig in BALF (122) and immune complexes were observed in the BALF and lungs of IPF patients (123–126). These findings are in line with the observed reduction of Bregs and observed increase of both Tfh and non-regulatory B cells in IPF. Autoreactive immune complexes are able to deposit in the lung and promote inflammation, while antibodies mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (mediated via complement activation or natural killer cells), processes that may drive IPF progression (127).
Antibodies, such as Rituximab, target the CD20 marker that is expressed on the surface of all B cells starting at the pre-B cell stage (128). These antibodies therefore inhibit CD20+ B cells, which as described above were found to be positively correlated to IPF progression (109–117). Rituximab indeed may be a viable treatment option of IPF (129, 130), and is included in 6 NIH registered clinical trials treating IPF at the time of writing (48)2. Unfortunately, CD20 antibodies also target CD20 expressing Bregs, showing a downside to unspecific downregulation of B cells. However, levels of CD20 expression differs among different B cells populations, with Bregs generally expressing lower levels of CD20 (131). Depletion of most CD20+ B cells by rituximab was found to enrich CD20low Bregs in mice and human cancer (131). The specific targeting of Bregs or non-regulatory B cells is limited by the lack of specific surface markers (132). However, Bregs might be targeted and upregulated via other pathways such as immunomodulation by MDSC (133). A study by Wu et al. found that PGE2 in the exosomes derived from polymorphonuclear (PMN)- MDSCs promote IL-10+ B cells and ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis in mice (133).
Collectively, Bregs seem to be able to play a vital role in the suppression of IPF. Progress in the specific depletion of non-regulatory B cells or in the expansion of Bregs may provide promising clues for future treatment strategies.
Macrophages
Macrophages play an important role in mediating tissue homeostasis and inflammation as well as phagocytosing viral, bacterial and parasitic pathogens and inducing the adaptive immune response by functioning as an APC (134). The disturbed balance in wound healing processes underlying IPF is thought to be primarily mediated by macrophages (11). Furthermore, the interplay of MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs), secreted by macrophages, among other secreted factors, such as collagen, shape the ECM. Macrophages thereby contribute to IPF in either a pro- or anti-fibrotic manner (135).
Increased number of macrophages was observed in the lungs of IPF patients (136), yet their functional role remains a matter of active discussion. Lung macrophages have been shown to play a crucial role during the fibrotic phase of BPF in mice (136). Low numbers of macrophages during the resolution phase were found to reduce ECM degradation and exacerbate PF (137). Depletion of macrophages in an early phase of fibrosis was, however, shown protective in a murine model of liver fibrosis (137). Previously, the M1/M2 macrophage polarization nomenclature, inspired by the Th1/Th2 paradigm, was commonly used to classify macrophages (86, 96, 138–149). M1-like macrophages have been found to promote fibrosis by secreting pro-inflammatory IL-6 and TNF-α as well as promoting the Th17 and neutrophilic immune response (86, 139–141). M2-like macrophages have been linked to fibrotic processes through the promotion of CC ligand (CCL) 2 and 17, TIMPs, fibronectin, Th2 response through IL-4 production, fibroblasts and the MFT of LR-MSCs (96, 142–149). On the other hand, the production of arginase-1 and MMPs, as well as anti-inflammatory IL-10, TGF-β1 and heme oxygenase 1 by M2-like macrophages suggest a protective role in IPF (96, 142, 143, 149). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-) α and PPAR-γ activation has been found to inhibit inflammation by inducing M2-like macrophages, which in turn may inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production (150, 151). These findings suggest PPAR ligands may be interesting therapeutic targets in IPF, especially considering they have also been found to directly inhibit fibroblast activation induced by TGF-β1 (152). However, as the M1/M2 paradigm is based on findings from ex vivo cultured cells, it is unable to accurately recapitulate the complexity of macrophage phenotypes in vivo, and, especially those observed in the IPF lung (153).
Recent studies have begun profiling individual cells, including macrophages, in IPF in great detail through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) (154). Several research groups made their scRNA-seq findings on thousands of cells derived from the lungs of IPF and healthy control available (154). Analysis of such data sets enables the identification of many novel macrophage subsets and their specific ontogeny relating to different stages of IPF. Highly proliferative osteopontin-expressing macrophages were identified through scRNA-seq and were found to mediate myofibroblast activation in the lungs of IPF patients (155). Similarly, another expanded population of pro-fibrotic CD36+CD84+ macrophages in IPF were identified, which also showed increased expression of genes involved in ECM remodeling (156, PREPRINT).
On the other hand, itaconate has recently been described to mediate anti-fibrotic effects of macrophages in the lungs (157). Decreased levels of pulmonary itaconate as well as reduced itaconate-synthesizing cis-aconitate decarboxylase (ACOD1) expression (which mediates itaconate production) in lung macrophages were observed in IPF patients (157). Acod1 deficient mice developed more severe BPF, while adoptive transfer of lung-derived monocytic macrophages from healthy donor mice alleviated the developed persistent fibrosis (157). Furthermore, itaconate was shown to decrease fibroblast proliferation and wound healing capacity of cultured fibroblasts (157).
The pentraxin-2 analogue, PRM-151, which inhibits the differentiation of monocytes into pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic macrophages (and fibrocytes), is therefore a promising therapy and is currently undergoing clinical trial for the treatment of IPF (158). However, several studies suggest possible anti-fibrotic and immunomodulating roles of macrophages, which may be suppressed in IPF, and therefore might provide interesting therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the recent unraveling of specialized macrophage subsets through tools such as scRNA-seq is rapidly increasing the understanding of the complex role they play in IPF and is expected to accelerate future research development substantially.
Dendritic Cells
DCs bridge the innate and adaptive immunity through their role as APCs (159). Besides their primary role as immune activators, DCs have also been described to play tolerogenic and regulatory roles (13). These tolerogenic DCs are crucial in the maintenance of central and peripheral tolerance by inducing clonal T cell deletion, T cell anergy, inhibition of memory and effector T cell responses and promoting Tregs (160).
DCs accumulate in the fibrotic lungs of BPF in mice (161, 162) as well as in the BALF and lungs of IPF patients (163–165), while circulating DCs were decreased (166). Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 ligand (Flt3L), a cytokine that promotes differentiation and proliferation of DCs, was found to be upregulated in the peripheral blood and lungs together with an increase in DCs in the lungs of TGF-β1-induced murine model of PF as well as in IPF patients (167). The unspecific deprivation of DCs in mice lacking Flt3L resulted in more severe PF, while unspecific upregulation of DCs, by supplementing Flt3L, resulted in reduced PF progression in a TGF-β1-induced PF mouse model (167). Specific depletion of DCs by diphtheria toxin (DT) in a mouse strain expressing zinc-finger and BTB domain containing 46 (Zbtb46; transcription factor keeping DCs in a quiescent state)-DT receptors was found to result in severe PF in a TGF-β1-induced mouse model of PF (167). In contrast, depletion of DCs by the administration of DT to CD11c-DT receptor-transgenic mice attenuated BPF (168). However, in the latter study it is important to note that CD11c-expressing macrophages were depleted as well, which may explain the discrepancy between the two studies (168). Inactivating DCs using VAG539, a pro-drug of VAF347, which activates the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon, attenuated BPF lung injury in mice (162). However, VAG539 modulates the cell physiology by binding the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor expressed in many other cell types besides DCs (169), and has been shown to promote the development of IL-22-secreting Th cells (170), making it questionable whether the attenuation can be attributed solely to DC inactivation. CD11b+ DCs have been found to upregulate the expression of several MMPs, promoting collagen and ECM degradation (171). CXCL4 has recently been identified to be crucial in altering DC development into a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotype that induces ECM accumulation and MFT (172).
Taken together, these findings suggests that besides their tolerogenic role, DCs may also play a detrimental role in IPF disease progression. However, due to a lack of convincing evidence on immune regulation by DCs in IPF, their role remains unclear and needs to be studied in more detail.
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
MDSCs are immature myeloid-derived cells that potently suppress the immune response, and are mainly subdivided into PMN- and monocytic (M)- MDSCs (173). Due to MDSCs plasticity they have also been found to differentiate into M2-like macrophages and tolerogenic-like DCs (174). The role of MDSCs in cancer is well established, however, their role in many other diseases, such as IPF, remains incompletely defined (14). Increased numbers of PMN-MDSCs were found in the lungs of BPF (and clodronate-treated) mice, likely through increased CXCR 2 expression (40). PMN-MDSCs were also increased in the peripheral blood of patients with interstitial pulmonary disease, while M-MDSC numbers remained unaltered (175). Increased numbers of CD33+CD11b+ cells (suggestive of MDSCs, particularly M-MDSCs) were found in the peripheral blood in the lungs of IPF patients (69). Increased MDSC numbers were suggested to correlate to poor lung function and increased number of Tregs in IPF patients (69). Depletion of MDSCs was found to enhance fibrosis markers in both kidney and liver models of fibrosis in mice (176), while adoptively transferred MDSCs ameliorated renal fibrosis modeled in mice (177), suggesting a protective role. Increased number of PMN-MDSCs were suggested to be correlated to a decrease in parenchymal fibrosis and attenuation of BPF in mice (175). Another study reported a population of circulating MDSC-like fibrocytes in cancer (178). Furthermore, cells generated from CD11b+CD115+Gr1+ MDSCs were shown to contribute to renal deposition of collagen type I in a murine model of renal fibrosis (179). As mentioned above, PMN-MDSCs have been found to promote Bregs, which was suggested to promote the potential protective role MDSCs play in IPF (133). Bone marrow-derived MSCs have been suggested to drive the differentiation of Gr1highCD11b+ cells (mainly PMN-MDSCs) towards a Gr1lowCD11b+ phenotype (indicative of M-MDSCs), which was found to inhibit BPF progression in mice (180).
In summary, literature suggests that the immune regulatory functions of anti-inflammatory MDSCs may promote anti-fibrotic effects, making them potentially interesting cells to target in the treatment of IPF. However, there remains a lot of uncertainty on their role, partly attributed to MDSCs plasticity, and more research is needed to further clarify their significance in IPF.
Interaction of Pharmacological Therapy and Immune Responses in IPF
Previously, immune suppressive medications including glucocorticoids and azathioprine or cyclophosphamide were used in the treatment of IPF (181). In 2015, a new guideline for treatment of IPF formulated strong recommendations against the use of immunosuppressive drugs in IPF (182). This suggestion was primarily based on a single multicenter study, PANTHER-IPF, which was terminated prematurely due to the major safety concerns in patients receiving combination therapy of prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine compared with placebo (183). However, the question remained whether immunosuppressants should be tested once more in combination with anti-fibrotics like nintedanib and pirfenidone in the context of IPF. Further long-term studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of the combination of immunosuppressive and anti-fibrotic therapy in IPF.
Pirfenidone
Pirfenidone is an anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant drug that has been found to interfere with fibroblast proliferation and MFT and the synthesis of ECM (184, 185). Three double blind randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials (CAPACITY 1 and 2 and ASCEND) approved the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in PF (186, 187). These studies showed that pirfenidone reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over a period of 1 year, by approximately 50%, in IPF patients with mild, moderate and severe impairment in lung function (187, 188). Pirfenidone improved life expectancy in IPF patients, however, its use is unfortunately not associated with significant improvement in clinical symptoms like cough or shortness of breath (187). Pirfenidone has been shown to inhibit pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokine production such as TGF-β, IL-4, IL-13, and TNF-α and promotes the production of anti-inflammatory IL-10 (189–194). The beneficial effect of pirfenidone in IPF may indeed be the result of the modulation of immune responses through modulating cytokines. However, the direct modulatory effects of pirfenidone on immune responses were not described for a long time. The direct immune modulatory properties of pirfenidone were first studied by Visner GA., et al., 2009, in a murine model of cardiac allograft transplantation (195). This study demonstrated the direct inhibitory role of pirfenidone on CD4+ and CD8+ cell proliferation index in vivo, whereas pirfenidone showed no effect on the immunosuppressive properties of Tregs (195). The same group of researchers studied the immunomodulatory role of pirfenidone in a murine model of lung allograft transplantation in 2012 (196). Here they showed that pirfenidone suppressed the activation of lung DCs in vivo (196). In this respect, in vitro treatment of DCs with pirfenidone reduced the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II and costimulatory molecules and impaired DC’s capacity to stimulate T cell activation (196). Considering the prolonged allograft survival and robust inhibitory effects of pirfenidone observed in in vivo models, as compared to in vitro conditions, it may be postulated that other regulatory immune mechanisms are involved in the immunosuppressive effect of pirfenidone besides its direct T cell inhibitory effects. Du et al. showed that pirfenidone reduced splenic germinal center B-cell and Tfh frequencies and reduced infiltration of M2-like macrophages into the lung as well as TGF-β production in a murine model of chronic GVHD (197). Recent studies attempted to investigate the efficacy of pirfenidone co-administered with standard chemotherapy, in cancer. A recent in vitro study suggested the inhibitory effect of pirfenidone on metastasis and immune suppressive capacity of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) through inhibition of expression of programmed death-ligand (PD-L) 1 on CAFs and cancer-promoting cytokines and chemokines secretion like TNF-β and CCL17 (198). The immunomodulatory role of pirfenidone needs to be studied in more detail in the TME of cancer models. Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pirfenidone for the treatment of IPF since 2014, there remains a lack of robust evidence on the interaction of pirfenidone and the immune system in IPF. Considering the important role of immune responses in IPF, the interaction between pirfenidone and the immune system needs to be studied in more detail, especially in IPF patients receiving long-term pirfenidone treatment.
Nintedanib
Nintedanib is a triple tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting PDGF, vascular endothelial growth factor and FGF receptors as well as the non-receptor members of the Src family (199, 200). Nintedanib is an anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory drug, and was found to reduce fibroblast proliferation, recruitment, and myofibroblast differentiation, and hinders the secretion of ECM in the lung (199). Two replicate Phase II randomized control studies (INPULSIS-1 and 2) confirmed the safety and tolerability profile of Nintedanib in PF (201). Nintedanib reduced the decline of lung function, improved life expectancy, and reduced the risk of acute exacerbations and mortality (201). Recently, the high affinity of nintedanib to FGF receptors and its favorable toxicity profile resulted in the successful application of nintedanib in combination with conventional chemotherapy in cancer patients, such as second-line therapy for rapidly progressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (202–207). However, the direct impact of nintedanib on the host immune response in the clinical cancer setting as well as in IPF is not completely understood. A recent study showed that nintedanib in combination with paclitaxel, a widely used chemotherapy medication, reduced the number of leukocytes and MDSCs in peripheral blood, and reduced the number of CD8+ and B cells in the tumors of Lewis lung carcinoma tumor bearing mice (208). However, nintedanib alone only reduced the mobilization of MDSCs into peripheral blood (208). Overed-Sayer et al., 2020, found that the number of lung mast cells is increased in IPF and was found to be negatively correlated with baseline lung function in humans (209). Additionally, they found that nintedanib, but not pirfenidone, inhibited human fibroblast mediated mast cell survival through stem cell factor receptors and reduced the recruitment of mast cells into the lungs of BPF in rats (209). Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting a dynamic interaction between nintedanib and immune cells, there remains limited understanding on its details, thus warranting further studies.
Novel Therapies for the Treatment of IPF
Future therapies in IPF would ideally target the phenotype and molecular endotype of IPF patients to further personalize treatments based on guided molecular testing. Completed or still ongoing clinical trials of other pharmacological therapies in IPF are listed (Table 1). Although some of the listed medications provided encouraging results on the safety and efficacy in IPF patients (227), several other medications failed to demonstrate benefits in treating patients with IPF in recent clinical trials (213–216). However, many of these new medications may potentially interact with the immune system and be beneficial in some endotype of the IPF patient population but both the exact effects of these medications on immune responses and the beneficial effects remain unclear. In recent years, novel revolutionary anti-cancer agents were also suggested to be used in IPF patients. A recent review article analyzed the available literature on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in IPF and suggested only a slight beneficial effect for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (228). Cross talk between PD-1, expressed on CD4+ T cells, and PD-L1, expressed on fibroblasts, was proposed to lead to IL17A and TGF-β production by CD4+ T cells, which in turn promoted fibrogenesis (228). Recent research also highlighted promising novel drug targets, such as IL-11 in PF, that warrant further studies (229).
Table 1 Last completed and/or ongoing clinical trials in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
However, our incomplete understanding of IPF pathogenesis, particularly of the role of both structural cells and immune cells in the initiation and progression of IPF, and interaction of current as well as novel therapies with the immune system represent important challenges on the way to success for future precision medicine. To this end, considering the high inter-individual variation in IPF patients, responses to any medication will presumably result in similar variation, thus underscoring the importance of the identification of biomarkers predicting treatment response.
Immunoregulatory Cells and Lung Transplantation in IPF
Progressive fibrosis in IPF can ultimately result in respiratory failure and death. Here, lung transplantation represents the only therapeutic option that has been linked with a survival benefit in patients suffering from IPF (230). In 2018, a total of 2562 lung transplants were performed in the US, with >60% for underlying disease of IPF (231). However, persisting donor organ scarcity is still limiting the availability of this life-saving therapeutic option. As a result, single-lung transplants (SLT) might represent an effective strategy to serve the increasing demand on donor organs. However, recent analysis of >9.000 patients undergoing lung transplantation for IPF within the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) area demonstrated that double-lung transplantations (DLTs) have improved survival compared to SLTs in patients suffering from IPF (232). Still, five-year survival rates after lung transplantation for IPF are worse compared to other indications (233) with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) affecting more than 50% of transplanted lungs after 5 years. Of note, fibrotic processes in the engrafted lung exhibit striking similarities to those in IPF (234).
Since the first report that Tregs are involved in preventing allograft rejection two decades ago (235), immunoregulatory cells have also been widely reported to play a significant role in the context of transplantation and graft tolerance. In more detail, graft acceptance could be linked to complex immunological cross-talk between many more cells, including Bregs, regulatory DCs and especially MDSCs. For example, MDSCs were shown to inhibit GVHD after cell transplantation via an arginase-1–dependent mechanism in an experimental model (236). In the clinical context, 50 patients with biopsy-proven acute T cell-mediated rejection (ATCMR) showed increased frequencies of MDSCs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after renal transplantation, which were linked to improved allograft function compared with the MDSCs low group (237). In addition, MDSCs isolated from 29 adult kidney transplant recipients were demonstrated to expand Tregs in vitro, while their accumulation overtime after transplantation linearly correlated with an increase of Tregs in vivo, thus providing further evidence for an interactive cross-talk between regulatory cell types (238).
Immunoregulatory cells have also entered the stage in the context of both experimental and clinical lung transplantation. Experimental data demonstrated that long-term lung acceptance is associated with the induction of bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT), where Tregs accumulate and recipient T cells interact with CD11c+ DCs, ultimately resulting in an immune quiescent state (239). Mechanistically, the depletion of Tregs from the BALT of tolerant lungs was shown to result in antibody‐mediated rejection, which was characterized by the generation of donor‐specific antibodies, complement deposition, and the destruction of airway epithelium. In contrast, the undepleted control group showed no evidence of rejection (240). Of note, a recent prospective human observational study could demonstrate that increased Treg frequencies after lung transplantations were reciprocal associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (241). Of particular interest, monocyte‐derived DCs, isolated from the peripheral blood of lung transplant patients without bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, were found to have higher IDO expression, implicating the involvement of MDSCs (242). A recent clinical study focused on MDSCs, assessing their phenotype and frequency in peripheral blood from 20 lung transplant recipients and its relationship to post-transplant complications and immunosuppression (243). In detail, MDSCs were isolated from PBMCs and their functionality was assessed in vitro by their capability to block CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation. As a result, MDSCs were increased in stable lung transplant recipients (n=6) vs. non-transplant controls (n=4). Furthermore, patients with infection (n=5) or CLAD (n=9) had lower MDSCs compared to stable recipients. Of note, MDSCs tended to correlate with blood levels of immunosuppressive medication (i.e. cyclosporine A and tacrolimus).
In addition, Bregs have also been shown to interact during the immunological cross-talk subsequent to allotransplantation by mainly promoting the development of Tregs while at the same time suppressing effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as demonstrated in experimental models (244). The first clinical study in 117 lung transplant recipients recently revealed that CD19+CD24highCD38high Breg cells were associated with chronic rejection while no significant correlation with Tregs was found (245).
Interestingly, a recent publication could demonstrate that the application of MSC–based therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) before lung transplantation ameliorated ischemic injury in an experimental pig model. In detail, the MSC group showed significantly lower IL-18 and IFN-γ levels and a significantly higher IL-4 level in lung tissue at 12 hours of EVLP compared to the control group thus reflecting a shift of the inflammatory network towards protective conditions. Of critical relevance, the pathological acute lung injury score after transplantation was significantly lower in the MSC-treated group compared to the control group (246). These experimental data are intriguing and might already point towards future directions where immunoregulatory cells might represent promising candidates for cell therapies.
Thus, there is robust and growing evidence that immunoregulatory cells play a pivotal role in allograft acceptance from both experimental and clinical science (247). Coming back to MDSCs, current data attribute the immunoregulatory properties of these cells mainly to two mechanisms of action upstream of T cells to shift the immune response towards peripheral tolerance: First, to their capacity to inhibit the proliferation of allogeneic T cells (243); Second, to their capacity of Treg induction (248, 249). Interestingly, the impact of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, to prevent allograft rejection, while at the same time acting on the immune cells in general, and MDSCs in particular, has also become a field of increasing research activities. Here, cyclosporine A, a widely used immunosuppressive drug from the group of calcineurin inhibitors, could be mechanistically linked to increased expression of IDO resulting in increased suppressive activities of MDSCs in a mouse skin transplant model (250).
Tacrolimus, another calcineurin inhibitor used to maintain immunosuppression, has recently been shown to increase the immunosuppressive capacity of MDSCs derived from human kidney allograft recipients in vitro (251). In the context of experimental trachea transplantation, the impact of Rapamycin combined with immature DCs (Rapa-imDC), isolated from bone marrow, was investigated in trachea recipient rats receiving Rapa-imDCs for 10 consecutive days after transplantation. Here, Rapa-imDC treatment induced T cell hyporesponsiveness by attenuating T cell differentiation into IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells while at the same time increasing Tregs. In addition, Rapa-imDC administration ameliorated airway obliteration symptoms and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration (252).
Taken together, immunoregulatory cells have been shown to play a central role in mediating the alloimmune response towards graft tolerance, thus becoming a promising target for new pharmacologic strategies in the clinical context of transplantation. However, our current understanding of how immunoregulatory cells are interacting in the clinical context of lung transplantation and IPF is still at its infancy, as particular data are missing thus far. Furthermore, we still have to foster our current understanding of how these cells are shaping the alloimmune response while interacting with current immunosuppressive drugs. Here, the clinical background of IPF patients undergoing lung transplantation with poor prognosis is calling for intensive research activities while the concept of tailored cell therapy is already arising from experimental science.
Conclusion
IPF is the most devastating interstitial lung disease, yet remains poorly characterized and understood. Lack of mechanistic understanding of the complex disease causality and the devastating chronic nature complicate research and development. There remains a lack of efficacy of pharmaceutical therapies and lung transplantation is currently still the only truly effective treatment IPF. Despite recent advances in our understanding of IPF, particularly the role of regulatory immune cells remains contradictory and poorly understood. Indeed most, if not all, of the regulatory immune cells involved exhibit both detrimental as well as beneficial effects in IPF. Substantial evidence underlines the negative role of macrophages in IPF, through the involvement in the dysregulated wound healing process and ECM build-up. On the other hand, the suppressed anti-fibrotic effects observed in lung macrophages hint to potential beneficial effects, resulting in a complex and controversially-discussed role for macrophages in IPF. There are several lines of evidence on the pro-fibrotic role of MSCs in IPF, mainly related to myofibroblast differentiation and cellular senescence. However, recent research on MSCs points to a beneficial role in IPF, mainly related to their anti-inflammatory characteristics. Tregs were also found to act beneficial or detrimental in IPF models, likely influenced by the state of the disease or the disease model used. The role of more recently discovered regulatory immune cells, namely Bregs, tolerogenic DCs, MDSCs and novel macrophage phenotypes in IPF remains unclear as well and needs to be studied in more detail. An increased understanding of the potential role of regulatory immune cells in IPF mouse models and, particularly, in human IPF will be of vital importance to design novel effective pharmaceutical treatments as well as improving the success of lung transplantation and to prevent related GVHD. This is especially true with regards to precision medicine that might define future healthcare frameworks. Therefore, further preclinical and human studies are crucial to better understand and define the role of immune regulatory cells in IPF pathogenesis.
Author Contributions
SK conceptualized the review. CG, AD, MQ, and SK contributed to the original draft. CG, AD, MQ, HR, DH, and SK contributed to revising and final approval of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the fortüne program of the University of Tübingen to MQ (2461-0-0) and SK (2458-0-0 and # 2606-0-0). We acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.
Conflict of Interest
Author DH was employed by the company Novartis.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1. Martinez FJ, Collard HR, Pardo A, Raghu G, Richeldi L, Selman M, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2017) 3:17074. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.74
2. Loomis-King H, Flaherty KR, Moore BB. Pathogenesis, current treatments and future directions for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol (2013) 13(3):377–85. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2013.03.015
3. Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jones MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet (2017) 389(10082):1941–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30866-8
4. Molyneaux PL, Maher TM. The role of infection in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev (2013) 22(129):376–81. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00000713
5. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol (2008) 214(2):199–210. doi: 10.1002/path.2277
6. Olson AL, Gifford AH, Inase N, Fernandez Perez ER, Suda T. The epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases at risk of a progressive-fibrosing phenotype. Eur Respir Rev (2018) 27(150):180077. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0077-2018
7. Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol (2014) 5:123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00123
8. Fernandez IE, Eickelberg O. New cellular and molecular mechanisms of lung injury and fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet (2012) 380(9842):680–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61144-1
9. Chanda D, Otoupalova E, Smith SR, Volckaert T, De Langhe SP, Thannickal VJ. Developmental pathways in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis. Mol Aspects Med (2019) 65:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.08.004
10. Moore MW, Herzog EL. Regulatory T Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Too Much of a Good Thing? Am J Pathol (2016) 186(8):1978–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.002
11. Zhang L, Wang Y, Wu G, Xiong W, Gu W, Wang CY. Macrophages: friend or foe in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Respir Res (2018) 19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0864-2
12. Asai Y, Chiba H, Nishikiori H, Kamekura R, Yabe H, Kondo S, et al. Aberrant populations of circulating T follicular helper cells and regulatory B cells underlying idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2019) 20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1216-6
13. Schmidt SV, Nino-Castro AC, Schultze JL. Regulatory dendritic cells: there is more than just immune activation. Front Immunol (2012) 3:274. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00274
14. Kolahian S, Oz HH, Zhou B, Griessinger CM, Rieber N, Hartl D. The emerging role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in lung diseases. Eur Respir J (2016) 47(3):967–77. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01572-2015
15. Pittenger MF, Discher DE, Peault BM, Phinney DG, Hare JM, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cell perspective: cell biology to clinical progress. NPJ Regener Med (2019) 4:22. doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0083-6
16. Weiss ARR, Dahlke MH. Immunomodulation by Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): Mechanisms of Action of Living, Apoptotic, and Dead MSCs. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01191
17. Foronjy RF, Majka SM. The potential for resident lung mesenchymal stem cells to promote functional tissue regeneration: understanding microenvironmental cues. Cells (2012) 1(4):874. doi: 10.3390/cells1040874
18. Hou J, Ma T, Cao H, Chen Y, Wang C, Chen X, et al. TNF-alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation promotes myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs and exacerbates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J Cell Physiol (2018) 233(3):2409–19. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26112
19. Xia H, Bodempudi V, Benyumov A, Hergert P, Tank D, Herrera J, et al. Identification of a cell-of-origin for fibroblasts comprising the fibrotic reticulum in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol (2014) 184(5):1369–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.01.012
20. Yang L, Herrera J, Gilbertsen A, Xia H, Smith K, Benyumov A, et al. IL-8 mediates idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis mesenchymal progenitor cell fibrogenicity. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2018) 314(1):L127–L36. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00200.2017
21. Chanda D, Kurundkar A, Rangarajan S, Locy M, Bernard K, Sharma NS, et al. Developmental Reprogramming in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells of Human Subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sci Rep (2016) 6:37445. doi: 10.1038/srep37445
22. Jun D, Garat C, West J, Thorn N, Chow K, Cleaver T, et al. The pathology of bleomycin-induced fibrosis is associated with loss of resident lung mesenchymal stem cells that regulate effector T-cell proliferation. Stem Cells (2011) 29(4):725–35. doi: 10.1002/stem.604
23. Chen X, Shi C, Cao H, Chen L, Hou J, Xiang Z, et al. The hedgehog and Wnt/beta-catenin system machinery mediate myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs in pulmonary fibrogenesis. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(6):639. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0692-9
24. Cao H, Chen X, Hou J, Wang C, Xiang Z, Shen Y, et al. The Shh/Gli signaling cascade regulates myofibroblastic activation of lung-resident mesenchymal stem cells via the modulation of Wnt10a expression during pulmonary fibrogenesis. Lab Invest (2020) 100(3):363–77. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0316-8
25. Wang C, Zhu H, Sun Z, Xiang Z, Ge Y, Ni C, et al. Inhibition of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling promotes epithelial differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and repairs bleomycin-induced lung injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2014) 307(3):C234–44. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00366.2013
26. Shi J, Li F, Luo M, Wei J, Liu X. Distinct Roles of Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Mediators Inflamm (2017) 2017:3520581. doi: 10.1155/2017/3520581
27. Chen X, Shi C, Wang C, Liu W, Chu Y, Xiang Z, et al. The role of miR-497-5p in myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs and pulmonary fibrogenesis. Sci Rep (2017) 7:40958. doi: 10.1038/srep40958
28. Luo Y, Xu W, Chen H, Warburton D, Dong R, Qian B, et al. A novel profibrotic mechanism mediated by TGFbeta-stimulated collagen prolyl hydroxylase expression in fibrotic lung mesenchymal cells. J Pathol (2015) 236(3):384–94. doi: 10.1002/path.4530
29. Cunningham PS, Meijer P, Nazgiewicz A, Anderson SG, Borthwick LA, Bagnall J, et al. The circadian clock protein REVERBalpha inhibits pulmonary fibrosis development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2020) 117(2):1139–47. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912109117
30. Ortiz LA, Gambelli F, McBride C, Gaupp D, Baddoo M, Kaminski N, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100(14):8407–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1432929100
31. Zhao F, Zhang YF, Liu YG, Zhou JJ, Li ZK, Wu CG, et al. Therapeutic effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells engraftment on bleomycin-induced lung injury in rats. Transplant Proc (2008) 40(5):1700–5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.01.080
32. Aguilar S, Scotton CJ, McNulty K, Nye E, Stamp G, Laurent G, et al. Bone marrow stem cells expressing keratinocyte growth factor via an inducible lentivirus protects against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. PloS One (2009) 4(11):e8013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008013
33. Cargnoni A, Gibelli L, Tosini A, Signoroni PB, Nassuato C, Arienti D, et al. Transplantation of allogeneic and xenogeneic placenta-derived cells reduces bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Cell Transplant (2009) 18(4):405–22. doi: 10.3727/096368909788809857
34. Kumamoto M, Nishiwaki T, Matsuo N, Kimura H, Matsushima K. Minimally cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate fibrotic lung injury. Eur Respir J (2009) 34(3):740–8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00128508
35. Moodley Y, Atienza D, Manuelpillai U, Samuel CS, Tchongue J, Ilancheran S, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reduce fibrosis of bleomycin-induced lung injury. Am J Pathol (2009) 175(1):303–13. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080629
36. Lee SH, Jang AS, Kim YE, Cha JY, Kim TH, Jung S, et al. Modulation of cytokine and nitric oxide by mesenchymal stem cell transfer in lung injury/fibrosis. Respir Res (2010) 11:16. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-16
37. Garcia O, Carraro G, Turcatel G, Hall M, Sedrakyan S, Roche T, et al. Amniotic fluid stem cells inhibit the progression of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis via CCL2 modulation in bronchoalveolar lavage. PloS One (2013) 8(8):e71679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071679
38. Gazdhar A, Susuri N, Hostettler K, Gugger M, Knudsen L, Roth M, et al. HGF Expressing Stem Cells in Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Originate from the Bone Marrow and Are Antifibrotic. PloS One (2013) 8(6):e65453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065453
39. Lee SH, Lee EJ, Lee SY, Kim JH, Shim JJ, Shin C, et al. The effect of adipose stem cell therapy on pulmonary fibrosis induced by repetitive intratracheal bleomycin in mice. Exp Lung Res (2014) 40(3):117–25. doi: 10.3109/01902148.2014.881930
40. Huang K, Kang X, Wang X, Wu S, Xiao J, Li Z, et al. Conversion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into type II alveolar epithelial cells reduces pulmonary fibrosis by decreasing oxidative stress in rats. Mol Med Rep (2015) 11(3):1685–92. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2981
41. Ono M, Ohkouchi S, Kanehira M, Tode N, Kobayashi M, Ebina M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells correct inappropriate epithelial-mesenchyme relation in pulmonary fibrosis using stanniocalcin-1. Mol Ther (2015) 23(3):549–60. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.217
42. Reddy M, Fonseca L, Gowda S, Chougule B, Hari A, Totey S. Human Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate Early Stage of Bleomycin Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: Comparison with Pirfenidone. Int J Stem Cells (2016) 9(2):192–206. doi: 10.15283/ijsc16041
43. Perez JR, Lee S, Ybarra N, Maria O, Serban M, Jeyaseelan K, et al. A comparative analysis of longitudinal computed tomography and histopathology for evaluating the potential of mesenchymal stem cells in mitigating radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):9056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09021-7
44. Tzouvelekis A, Toonkel R, Karampitsakos T, Medapalli K, Ninou I, Aidinis V, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front Med (Lausanne) (2018) 5:142. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00142
45. Liu S, Peng D, Qiu H, Yang K, Fu Z, Zou L. Mesenchymal stem cells as a potential therapy for COVID-19. Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) 11(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01678-8
46. Yen BL, Yen ML, Wang LT, Liu KJ, Sytwu HK. Current status of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for immune/inflammatory lung disorders: Gleaning insights for possible use in COVID-19. Stem Cells Transl Med (2020) 9(10):1163–73. doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0186
47. Harrell CR, Jovicic N, Djonov V, Arsenijevic N, Volarevic V. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles as New Remedies in the Therapy of Inflammatory Diseases. Cells (2019) 8(12):1605. doi: 10.3390/cells8121605
48. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Registered clinical trials . Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ (Accessed January, 2021).
49. Chambers DC, Enever D, Ilic N, Sparks L, Whitelaw K, Ayres J, et al. A phase 1b study of placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology (2014) 19(7):1013–8. doi: 10.1111/resp.12343
50. Glassberg MK, Minkiewicz J, Toonkel RL, Simonet ES, Rubio GA, DiFede D, et al. Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis via Intravenous Delivery (AETHER): A Phase I Safety Clinical Trial. Chest (2017) 151(5):971–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.061
51. Averyanov A, Koroleva I, Konoplyannikov M, Revkova V, Lesnyak V, Kalsin V, et al. First-in-human high-cumulative-dose stem cell therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with rapid lung function decline. Stem Cells Transl Med (2020) 9(1):6–16. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0037
52. Tzouvelekis A, Paspaliaris V, Koliakos G, Ntolios P, Bouros E, Oikonomou A, et al. A prospective, non-randomized, no placebo-controlled, phase Ib clinical trial to study the safety of the adipose derived stromal cells-stromal vascular fraction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Transl Med (2013) 11:171. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-171
53. Charo RA, Sipp D. Rejuvenating Regenerative Medicine Regulation. N Engl J Med (2018) 378(6):504–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1715736
54. Marks PW, Witten CM, Califf RM. Clarifying Stem-Cell Therapy’s Benefits and Risks. N Engl J Med (2017) 376(11):1007–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1613723
55. Leeman KT, Pessina P, Lee JH, Kim CF. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Increase Alveolar Differentiation in Lung Progenitor Organoid Cultures. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):6479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42819-1
56. Li X, Yue S, Luo Z. Mesenchymal stem cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Oncotarget (2017) 8(60):102600–16. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18126
57. Liu M, Zeng X, Wang J, Fu Z, Wang J, Liu M, et al. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells in treating human autoimmune disease-associated lung fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther (2016) 7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0319-y
58. Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat Med (2012) 18(5):759–65. doi: 10.1038/nm.2736
59. Shentu TP, Huang TS, Cernelc-Kohan M, Chan J, Wong SS, Espinoza CR, et al. Thy-1 dependent uptake of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles blocks myofibroblastic differentiation. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):18052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18288-9
60. Choi M, Ban T, Rhim T. Therapeutic use of stem cell transplantation for cell replacement or cytoprotective effect of microvesicle released from mesenchymal stem cell. Mol Cells (2014) 37(2):133–9. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2317
61. Sinclair K, Yerkovich ST, Chambers DC. Mesenchymal stem cells and the lung. Respirology (2013) 18(3):397–411. doi: 10.1111/resp.12050
62. Cardenes N, Alvarez D, Sellares J, Peng Y, Corey C, Wecht S, et al. Senescence of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther (2018) 9(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0970-6
63. Habiel DM, Hohmann MS, Espindola MS, Coelho AL, Jones I, Jones H, et al. DNA-PKcs modulates progenitor cell proliferation and fibroblast senescence in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med (2019) 19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0922-7
64. Tashiro J, Elliot SJ, Gerth DJ, Xia X, Pereira-Simon S, Choi R, et al. Therapeutic benefits of young, but not old, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a chronic mouse model of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Transl Res (2015) 166(6):554–67. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.09.004
65. Kolahian S, Fernandez IE, Eickelberg O, Hartl D. Immune Mechanisms in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2016) 55(3):309–22. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0121TR
66. Desai O, Winkler J, Minasyan M, Herzog EL. The Role of Immune and Inflammatory Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front Med (Lausanne) (2018) 5:43. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00043
67. Gilani SR, Vuga LJ, Lindell KO, Gibson KF, Xue J, Kaminski N, et al. CD28 down-regulation on circulating CD4 T-cells is associated with poor prognoses of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PloS One (2010) 5(1):e8959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008959
68. Herazo-Maya JD, Noth I, Duncan SR, Kim S, Ma SF, Tseng GC, et al. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression profiles predict poor outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Transl Med (2013) 5(205):205ra136. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005964
69. Fernandez IE, Greiffo FR, Frankenberger M, Bandres J, Heinzelmann K, Neurohr C, et al. Peripheral blood myeloid-derived suppressor cells reflect disease status in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2016) 48(4):1171–83. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01826-2015
70. Reilkoff RA, Peng H, Murray LA, Peng X, Russell T, Montgomery R, et al. Semaphorin 7a+ regulatory T cells are associated with progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and are implicated in transforming growth factor-beta1-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 187(2):180–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1109OC
71. Moore BB, Fry C, Zhou Y, Murray S, Han MK, Martinez FJ, et al. Inflammatory leukocyte phenotypes correlate with disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Front Med (2014) 1(56):56. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00056
72. Galati D, De Martino M, Trotta A, Rea G, Bruzzese D, Cicchitto G, et al. Peripheral depletion of NK cells and imbalance of the Treg/Th17 axis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Cytokine (2014) 66(2):119–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.12.003
73. Hou Z, Ye Q, Qiu M, Hao Y, Han J, Zeng H. Increased activated regulatory T cells proportion correlate with the severity of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2017) 18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0653-3
74. Lo Re S, Lecocq M, Uwambayinema F, Yakoub Y, Delos M, Demoulin JB, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor-producing CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T lymphocytes promote lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 184(11):1270–81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0516OC
75. D’Alessandro-Gabazza CN, Kobayashi T, Yasuma T, Toda M, Kim H, Fujimoto H, et al. A Staphylococcus pro-apoptotic peptide induces acute exacerbation of pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):1539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15344-3
76. Kotsianidis I, Nakou E, Bouchliou I, Tzouvelekis A, Spanoudakis E, Steiropoulos P, et al. Global impairment of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2009) 179(12):1121–30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1936OC
77. Shimizu Y, Dobashi K, Endou K, Ono A, Yanagitani N, Utsugi M, et al. Decreased interstitial FOXP3(+) lymphocytes in usual interstitial pneumonia with discrepancy of CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol (2010) 23(2):449–61. doi: 10.1177/039463201002300207
78. Kitani A, Fuss I, Nakamura K, Kumaki F, Usui T, Strober W. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1-producing regulatory T cells induce Smad-mediated interleukin 10 secretion that facilitates coordinated immunoregulatory activity and amelioration of TGF-beta1-mediated fibrosis. J Exp Med (2003) 198(8):1179–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030917
79. Wangoo A, Laban C, Cook HT, Glenville B, Shaw RJ. Interleukin-10- and corticosteroid-induced reduction in type I procollagen in a human ex vivo scar culture. Int J Exp Pathol (1997) 78(1):33–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2613.1997.d01-241.x
80. Arai T, Abe K, Matsuoka H, Yoshida M, Mori M, Goya S, et al. Introduction of the interleukin-10 gene into mice inhibited bleomycin-induced lung injury in vivo. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2000) 278(5):L914–22. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.5.L914
81. Boveda-Ruiz D, D’Alessandro-Gabazza CN, Toda M, Takagi T, Naito M, Matsushima Y, et al. Differential role of regulatory T cells in early and late stages of pulmonary fibrosis. Immunobiology (2013) 218(2):245–54. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.05.020
82. Zeng M, Smith AJ, Wietgrefe SW, Southern PJ, Schacker TW, Reilly CS, et al. Cumulative mechanisms of lymphoid tissue fibrosis and T cell depletion in HIV-1 and SIV infections. J Clin Invest (2011) 121(3):998–1008. doi: 10.1172/JCI45157
83. Estes JD, Wietgrefe S, Schacker T, Southern P, Beilman G, Reilly C, et al. Simian immunodeficiency virus-induced lymphatic tissue fibrosis is mediated by transforming growth factor beta 1-positive regulatory T cells and begins in early infection. J Infect Dis (2007) 195(4):551–61. doi: 10.1086/510852
84. Holmes S, Downs AM, Fosberry A, Hayes PD, Michalovich D, Murdoch P, et al. Sema7A is a potent monocyte stimulator. Scand J Immunol (2002) 56(3):270–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01129.x
85. van Rijn A, Paulis L, te Riet J, Vasaturo A, Reinieren-Beeren I, van der Schaaf A, et al. Semaphorin 7A Promotes Chemokine-Driven Dendritic Cell Migration. J Immunol (2016) 196(1):459–68. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403096
86. Kral JB, Kuttke M, Schrottmaier WC, Birnecker B, Warszawska J, Wernig C, et al. Sustained PI3K Activation exacerbates BLM-induced Lung Fibrosis via activation of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pathways. Sci Rep (2016) 6:23034. doi: 10.1038/srep23034
87. Griffiths K, Habiel DM, Jaffar J, Binder U, Darby WG, Hosking CG, et al. Anti-fibrotic Effects of CXCR4-Targeting i-body AD-114 in Preclinical Models of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):3212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20811-5
88. Jaffar J, Griffiths K, Oveissi S, Duan M, Foley M, Glaspole I, et al. CXCR4(+) cells are increased in lung tissue of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2020) 21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01467-0
89. Phillips RJ, Burdick MD, Hong K, Lutz MA, Murray LA, Xue YY, et al. Circulating fibrocytes traffic to the lungs in response to CXCL12 and mediate fibrosis. J Clin Invest (2004) 114(3):438–46. doi: 10.1172/JCI20997
90. Reilkoff RA, Bucala R, Herzog EL. Fibrocytes: emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(6):427–35. doi: 10.1038/nri2990
91. Garibaldi BT, D’Alessio FR, Mock JR, Files DC, Chau E, Eto Y, et al. Regulatory T cells reduce acute lung injury fibroproliferation by decreasing fibrocyte recruitment. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2013) 48(1):35–43. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0198OC
92. Peng X, Moore MW, Peng H, Sun H, Gan Y, Homer RJ, et al. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Regulatory Tregs inhibit fibrocyte recruitment and fibrosis via suppression of FGF-9 production in the TGF-beta1 exposed murine lung. Front Pharmacol (2014) 5:80. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00080
93. Oldroyd SD, Thomas GL, Gabbiani G, El Nahas AM. Interferon-gamma inhibits experimental renal fibrosis. Kidney Int (1999) 56(6):2116–27. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00775.x
94. Park Y, Oh SJ, Chung DH. CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells attenuate Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis by suppressing IFN-gamma production by CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. J Leukoc Biol (2009) 86(6):1427–37. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0908542
95. Wilson MS, Madala SK, Ramalingam TR, Gochuico BR, Rosas IO, Cheever AW, et al. Bleomycin and IL-1beta-mediated pulmonary fibrosis is IL-17A dependent. J Exp Med (2010) 207(3):535–52. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092121
96. Barron L, Wynn TA. Fibrosis is regulated by Th2 and Th17 responses and by dynamic interactions between fibroblasts and macrophages. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2011) 300(5):G723–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00414.2010
97. Paun A, Bergeron ME, Haston CK. The Th1/Th17 balance dictates the fibrosis response in murine radiation-induced lung disease. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):11586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11656-5
98. Cao Q, Wang L, Du F, Sheng H, Zhang Y, Wu J, et al. Downregulation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells may underlie enhanced Th1 immunity caused by immunization with activated autologous T cells. Cell Res (2007) 17(7):627–37. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.46
99. Liu F, Liu J, Weng D, Chen Y, Song L, He Q, et al. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells depletion may attenuate the development of silica-induced lung fibrosis in mice. PloS One (2010) 5(11):e15404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015404
100. Xiong S, Guo R, Yang Z, Xu L, Du L, Li R, et al. Treg depletion attenuates irradiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis by reducing fibrocyte accumulation, inducing Th17 response, and shifting IFN-gamma, IL-12/IL-4, IL-5 balance. Immunobiology (2015) 220(11):1284–91. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.07.001
101. Song L, Weng D, Liu F, Chen Y, Li C, Dong L, et al. Tregs promote the differentiation of Th17 cells in silica-induced lung fibrosis in mice. PloS One (2012) 7(5):e37286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037286
102. Birjandi SZ, Palchevskiy V, Xue YY, Nunez S, Kern R, Weigt SS, et al. CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) Cells Exacerbate Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Pathol (2016) 186(8):2008–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.020
103. Habiel DM, Espindola MS, Kitson C, Azzara AV, Coelho AL, Stripp B, et al. Characterization of CD28(null) T cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol (2019) 12(1):212–22. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0082-8
104. Koreth J, Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough SM, Bindra B, Alyea EP,3, et al. Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med (2011) 365(22):2055–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108188
105. Saadoun D, Rosenzwajg M, Joly F, Six A, Carrat F, Thibault V, et al. Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N Engl J Med (2011) 365(22):2067–77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105143
106. D’Alessio FR, Tsushima K, Aggarwal NR, West EE, Willett MH, Britos MF, et al. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs resolve experimental lung injury in mice and are present in humans with acute lung injury. J Clin Invest (2009) 119(10):2898–913. doi: 10.1172/JCI36498
107. Trujillo G, Hartigan AJ, Hogaboam CM. T regulatory cells and attenuated bleomycin-induced fibrosis in lungs of CCR7-/- mice. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair (2010) 3:18. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-3-18
108. LeBien TW, Tedder TF. B lymphocytes: how they develop and function. Blood (2008) 112(5):1570–80. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078071
109. Heukels P, van Hulst JAC, van Nimwegen M, Boorsma CE, Melgert BN, von der Thusen JH, et al. Enhanced Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B-cells and autoreactive IgA in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2019) 20(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1195-7
110. Xue J, Kass DJ, Bon J, Vuga L, Tan J, Csizmadia E, et al. Plasma B lymphocyte stimulator and B cell differentiation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. J Immunol (2013) 191(5):2089–95. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203476
111. Todd NW, Scheraga RG, Galvin JR, Iacono AT, Britt EJ, Luzina IG, et al. Lymphocyte aggregates persist and accumulate in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Inflammation Res (2013) 6:63–70. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S40673
112. Nuovo GJ, Hagood JS, Magro CM, Chin N, Kapil R, Davis L, et al. The distribution of immunomodulatory cells in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mod Pathol (2012) 25(3):416–33. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.166
113. Campbell DA, Poulter LW, Janossy G, du Bois RM. Immunohistological analysis of lung tissue from patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis suggesting local expression of immune hypersensitivity. Thorax (1985) 40(6):405–11. doi: 10.1136/thx.40.6.405
114. Tzouvelekis A, Zacharis G, Oikonomou A, Mikroulis D, Margaritopoulos G, Koutsopoulos A, et al. Increased incidence of autoimmune markers in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. BMC Pulm Med (2013) 13:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-31
115. Vuga LJ, Tedrow JR, Pandit KV, Tan J, Kass DJ, Xue J, et al. C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13) is a prognostic biomarker of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2014) 189(8):966–74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1592OC
116. DePianto DJ, Chandriani S, Abbas AR, Jia G, N’Diaye EN, Caplazi P, et al. Heterogeneous gene expression signatures correspond to distinct lung pathologies and biomarkers of disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax (2015) 70(1):48–56. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204596
117. O’Donoghue RJ, Knight DA, Richards CD, Prele CM, Lau HL, Jarnicki AG, et al. Genetic partitioning of interleukin-6 signalling in mice dissociates Stat3 from Smad3-mediated lung fibrosis. EMBO Mol Med (2012) 4(9):939–51. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100604
118. Rosser EC, Mauri C. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity (2015) 42(4):607–12. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005
119. Palomares O, Martin-Fontecha M, Lauener R, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Cavkaytar O, Akdis M, et al. Regulatory T cells and immune regulation of allergic diseases: roles of IL-10 and TGF-beta. Genes Immun (2014) 15(8):511–20. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.45
120. Crotty S. T follicular helper cell differentiation, function, and roles in disease. Immunity (2014) 41(4):529–42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.004
121. Achour A, Simon Q, Mohr A, Seite JF, Youinou P, Bendaoud B, et al. Human regulatory B cells control the TFH cell response. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2017) 140(1):215–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.042
122. Groot Kormelink T, Pardo A, Knipping K, Buendia-Roldan I, Garcia-de-Alba C, Blokhuis BR, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chains are increased in hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PloS One (2011) 6(9):e25392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025392
123. Wallace WA, Roberts SN, Caldwell H, Thornton E, Greening AP, Lamb D, et al. Circulating antibodies to lung protein(s) in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Thorax (1994) 49(3):218–24. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.3.218
124. Dall’Aglio PP, Pesci A, Bertorelli G, Brianti E, Scarpa S. Study of immune complexes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. Respiration (1988) 54 Suppl 1:36–41. doi: 10.1159/000195495
125. Dobashi N, Fujita J, Murota M, Ohtsuki Y, Yamadori I, Yoshinouchi T, et al. Elevation of anti-cytokeratin 18 antibody and circulating cytokeratin 18: anti-cytokeratin 18 antibody immune complexes in sera of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lung (2000) 178(3):171–9. doi: 10.1007/s004080000020
126. Kahloon RA, Xue J, Bhargava A, Csizmadia E, Otterbein L, Kass DJ, et al. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with antibodies to heat shock protein 70 have poor prognoses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 187(7):768–75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0506OC
127. Hoyne GF, Elliott H, Mutsaers SE, Prele CM. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and a role for autoimmunity. Immunol Cell Biol (2017) 95(7):577–83. doi: 10.1038/icb.2017.22
128. Ernst JA, Li H, Kim HS, Nakamura GR, Yansura DG, Vandlen RL. Isolation and characterization of the B-cell marker CD20. Biochemistry (2005) 44(46):15150–8. doi: 10.1021/bi0511078
129. Donahoe M, Valentine VG, Chien N, Gibson KF, Raval JS, Saul M, et al. Autoantibody-Targeted Treatments for Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. PloS One (2015) 10(6):e0127771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127771
130. Brito Y, Glassberg MK, Ascherman DP. Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Current Concepts. Curr Rheumatol Rep (2017) 19(12):79. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0701-5
131. Bodogai M, Lee Chang C, Wejksza K, Lai J, Merino M, Wersto RP, et al. Anti-CD20 antibody promotes cancer escape via enrichment of tumor-evoked regulatory B cells expressing low levels of CD20 and CD137L. Cancer Res (2013) 73(7):2127–38. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4184
132. Mauri C, Menon M. Human regulatory B cells in health and disease: therapeutic potential. J Clin Invest (2017) 127(3):772–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI85113
133. Wu X, Zhu D, Tian J, Tang X, Guo H, Ma J, et al. Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Exosomal Prostaglandin E2 Ameliorates Collagen-Induced Arthritis by Enhancing IL-10(+) B Cells. Front Immunol (2020) 11:588500. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.588500
134. Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley K. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science (2010) 327(5966):656–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1178331
135. Craig VJ, Zhang L, Hagood JS, Owen CA. Matrix metalloproteinases as therapeutic targets for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2015) 53(5):585–600. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0020TR
136. Gibbons MA, MacKinnon AC, Ramachandran P, Dhaliwal K, Duffin R, Phythian-Adams AT, et al. Ly6Chi monocytes direct alternatively activated profibrotic macrophage regulation of lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 184(5):569–81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1719OC
137. Duffield JS, Forbes SJ, Constandinou CM, Clay S, Partolina M, Vuthoori S, et al. Selective depletion of macrophages reveals distinct, opposing roles during liver injury and repair. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(1):56–65. doi: 10.1172/JCI22675
138. Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol (2000) 164(12):6166–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166
139. Raghu G, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, du Bois RM, Lasky JA, et al. Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an exploratory, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2008) 178(9):948–55. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200709-1446OC
140. Siwik DA, Chang DL, Colucci WS. Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha decrease collagen synthesis and increase matrix metalloproteinase activity in cardiac fibroblasts in vitro. Circ Res (2000) 86(12):1259–65. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.12.1259
141. Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Yu S, Chen S, Luo Y, et al. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat Med (2005) 11(11):1173–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1315
142. Song E, Ouyang N, Horbelt M, Antus B, Wang M, Exton MS. Influence of alternatively and classically activated macrophages on fibrogenic activities of human fibroblasts. Cell Immunol (2000) 204(1):19–28. doi: 10.1006/cimm.2000.1687
143. Sun L, Louie MC, Vannella KM, Wilke CA, LeVine AM, Moore BB, et al. New concepts of IL-10-induced lung fibrosis: fibrocyte recruitment and M2 activation in a CCL2/CCR2 axis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2011) 300(3):L341–53. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00122.2010
144. Murthy S, Larson-Casey JL, Ryan AJ, He C, Kobzik L, Carter AB. Alternative activation of macrophages and pulmonary fibrosis are modulated by scavenger receptor, macrophage receptor with collagenous structure. FASEB J (2015) 29(8):3527–36. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-271304
145. Pechkovsky DV, Prasse A, Kollert F, Engel KM, Dentler J, Luttmann W, et al. Alternatively activated alveolar macrophages in pulmonary fibrosis-mediator production and intracellular signal transduction. Clin Immunol (2010) 137(1):89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.06.017
146. Gratchev A, Guillot P, Hakiy N, Politz O, Orfanos CE, Schledzewski K, et al. lternatively activated macrophages differentially express fibronectin and its splice variants and the extracellular matrix protein betaIG-H3. AScand J Immunol (2001) 53(4):386–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00885.x
147. Selman M, Ruiz V, Cabrera S, Segura L, Ramirez R, Barrios R, et al. TIMP-1, -2, -3, and -4 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A prevailing nondegradative lung microenvironment? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2000) 279(3):L562–74. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.3.L562
148. Hou J, Shi J, Chen L, Lv Z, Chen X, Cao H, et al. M2 macrophages promote myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs and are associated with pulmonary fibrogenesis. Cell Commun Signal (2018) 16(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0300-8
149. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(11):723–37. doi: 10.1038/nri3073
150. Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature (1998) 391(6662):79–82. doi: 10.1038/34178
151. Odegaard JI, Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, Goforth MH, Morel CR, Subramanian V, Mukundan L, et al. Macrophage-specific PPARgamma controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance. Nature (2007) 447(7148):1116–20. doi: 10.1038/nature05894
152. Kulkarni AA, Thatcher TH, Olsen KC, Maggirwar SB, Phipps RP, Sime PJ. PPAR-gamma ligands repress TGFbeta-induced myofibroblast differentiation by targeting the PI3K/Akt pathway: implications for therapy of fibrosis. PloS One (2011) 6(1):e15909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015909
153. Ogger PP, Byrne AJ. Macrophage metabolic reprogramming during chronic lung disease. Mucosal Immunol (2021) 14(2):282–95. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-00356-5
154. Neumark N, Cosme C Jr, Rose KA, Kaminski N. The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Cell Atlas. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2020) 319(6):L887–L93. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00451.2020
155. Morse C, Tabib T, Sembrat J, Buschur KL, Bittar HT, Valenzi E, et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2019) 54(2):1802441. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02441-2018
156. Ayaub E, Poli S, Ng J, Adams T, Schupp J, Quesada-Arias L, et al. Single Cell RNA-seq and Mass Cytometry Reveals a Novel and a Targetable Population of Macrophages in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. bioRxiv (2021), 2021.01.04.425268. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.04.425268
157. Ogger PP, Albers GJ, Hewitt RJ, O’Sullivan BJ, Powell JE, Calamita E, et al. Itaconate controls the severity of pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Immunol (2020) 5(52):eabc1884. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abc1884
158. Duffield JS, Lupher ML Jr. PRM-151 (recombinant human serum amyloid P/pentraxin 2) for the treatment of fibrosis. Drug News Perspect (2010) 23(5):305–15. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.5.1444206
159. Steinman RM, Inaba K, Turley S, Pierre P, Mellman I. Antigen capture, processing, and presentation by dendritic cells: recent cell biological studies. Hum Immunol (1999) 60(7):562–7. doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(99)00030-0
160. Domogalla MP, Rostan PV, Raker VK, Steinbrink K. Tolerance through Education: How Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Shape Immunity. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1764. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01764
161. Chakraborty K, Chatterjee S, Bhattacharyya A. Modulation of CD11c+ lung dendritic cells in respect to TGF-beta in experimental pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Biol Int (2017) 41(9):991–1000. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10800
162. Bantsimba-Malanda C, Marchal-Somme J, Goven D, Freynet O, Michel L, Crestani B, et al. A role for dendritic cells in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice? Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2010) 182(3):385–95. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1164OC
163. Greer AM, Matthay MA, Kukreja J, Bhakta NR, Nguyen CP, Wolters PJ, et al. Accumulation of BDCA1(+) dendritic cells in interstitial fibrotic lung diseases and Th2-high asthma. PloS One (2014) 9(6):e99084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099084
164. Tsoumakidou M, Karagiannis KP, Bouloukaki I, Zakynthinos S, Tzanakis N, Siafakas NM. Increased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid CD1c expressing dendritic cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration (2009) 78(4):446–52. doi: 10.1159/000226244
165. Marchal-Somme J, Uzunhan Y, Marchand-Adam S, Kambouchner M, Valeyre D, Crestani B, et al. Dendritic cells accumulate in human fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2007) 176(10):1007–14. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1347OC
166. Galati D, Zanotta S, Polistina GE, Coppola A, Capitelli L, Bocchino M. Circulating dendritic cells are severely decreased in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with a potential value for prognosis prediction. Clin Immunol (2020) 215:108454. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108454
167. Tort Tarres M, Aschenbrenner F, Maus R, Stolper J, Schuette L, Knudsen L, et al. The FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 ligand/lung dendritic cell axis contributes to regulation of pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax (2019) 74(10):947–57. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212603
168. Ding L, Liu T, Wu Z, Hu B, Nakashima T, Ullenbruch M, et al. Bone Marrow CD11c+ Cell-Derived Amphiregulin Promotes Pulmonary Fibrosis. J Immunol (2016) 197(1):303–12. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502479
169. Hauben E, Gregori S, Draghici E, Migliavacca B, Olivieri S, Woisetschlager M, et al. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor promotes allograft-specific tolerance through direct and dendritic cell-mediated effects on regulatory T cells. Blood (2008) 112(4):1214–22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-109843
170. Baba N, Rubio M, Kenins L, Regairaz C, Woisetschlager M, Carballido JM, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand VAF347 selectively acts on monocytes and naive CD4(+) Th cells to promote the development of IL-22-secreting Th cells. Hum Immunol (2012) 73(8):795–800. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.05.002
171. Yen JH, Khayrullina T, Ganea D. PGE2-induced metalloproteinase-9 is essential for dendritic cell migration. Blood (2008) 111(1):260–70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-090613
172. Silva-Cardoso SC, Tao W, Angiolilli C, Lopes AP, Bekker CPJ, Devaprasad A, et al. CXCL4 Links Inflammation and Fibrosis by Reprogramming Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells in vitro. Front Immunol (2020) 11:2149. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02149
173. Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, Colombo MP, Frey AB, Greten TF, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150
174. Narita Y, Wakita D, Ohkur T, Chamoto K, Nishimura T. Potential differentiation of tumor bearing mouse CD11b+Gr-1+ immature myeloid cells into both suppressor macrophages and immunostimulatory dendritic cells. BioMed Res (2009) 30(1):7–15. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.30.7
175. Bryant AJ, Shenoy V, Fu C, Marek G, Lorentsen KJ, Herzog EL, et al. Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells Are Necessary for Development of Pulmonary Hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2018) 58(2):170–80. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0214OC
176. Hochst B, Mikulec J, Baccega T, Metzger C, Welz M, Peusquens J, et al. Differential induction of Ly6G and Ly6C positive myeloid derived suppressor cells in chronic kidney and liver inflammation and fibrosis. PloS One (2015) 10(3):e0119662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119662
177. Hsieh CC, Lin CL, He JT, Chiang M, Wang Y, Tsai YC, et al. Administration of cytokine-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells ameliorates renal fibrosis in diabetic mice. Stem Cell Res Ther (2018) 9(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0915-0
178. Zhang H, Maric I, DiPrima MJ, Khan J, Orentas RJ, Kaplan RN, et al. Fibrocytes represent a novel MDSC subset circulating in patients with metastatic cancer. Blood (2013) 122(7):1105–13. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-449413
179. Niedermeier M, Reich B, Rodriguez Gomez M, Denzel A, Schmidbauer K, Gobel N, et al. CD4+ T cells control the differentiation of Gr1+ monocytes into fibrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2009) 106(42):17892–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906070106
180. Su X, Yang L, Yin Y, Huang J, Qiao F, Fang Y, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells tune the differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in bleomycin-induced lung injury. Stem Cell Res Ther (2018) 9(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0983-1
181. American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2000) 161(2 Pt 1):646–64. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.ats3-00
182. Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CA, Azuma A, Behr J, et al. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 192(2):e3–19. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1063ST
183. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research N, Raghu G, Anstrom KJ, King TE Jr, Lasky JA, Martinez FJ. Prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine for pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med (2012) 366(21):1968–77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113354
184. Lehtonen ST, Veijola A, Karvonen H, Lappi-Blanco E, Sormunen R, Korpela S, et al. Pirfenidone and nintedanib modulate properties of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2016) 17:14. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0328-5
185. Ahluwalia N, Shea BS, Tager AM. New therapeutic targets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Aiming to rein in runaway wound-healing responses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2014) 190(8):867–78. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0509PP
186. King TE Jr, Bradford WZ, Castro-Bernardini S, Fagan EA, Glaspole I, Glassberg MK, et al. A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med (2014) 370(22):2083–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402582
187. Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Glassberg MK, Kardatzke D, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet (2011) 377(9779):1760–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60405-4
188. Costabel U, Albera C, Glassberg MK, Lancaster LH, Wuyts WA, Petzinger U, et al. Effect of pirfenidone in patients with more advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res (2019) 20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1021-2
189. Liu H, Drew P, Gaugler AC, Cheng Y, Visner GA. Pirfenidone inhibits lung allograft fibrosis through L-arginine-arginase pathway. Am J Transpl (2005) 5(6):1256–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00876.x
190. Hirano A, Kanehiro A, Ono K, Ito W, Yoshida A, Okada C, et al. Pirfenidone modulates airway responsiveness, inflammation, and remodeling after repeated challenge. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2006) 35(3):366–77. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0452OC
191. Shihab FS, Bennett WM, Yi H, Andoh TF. Pirfenidone treatment decreases transforming growth factor-beta1 and matrix proteins and ameliorates fibrosis in chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Am J Transpl (2002) 2(2):111–9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.020201.x
192. Cain WC, Stuart RW, Lefkowitz DL, Starnes JD, Margolin S, Lefkowitz SS. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor and subsequent endotoxin shock by pirfenidone. Int J Immunopharmacol (1998) 20(12):685–95. doi: 10.1016/s0192-0561(98)00042-3
193. Nakazato H, Oku H, Yamane S, Tsuruta Y, Suzuki R. A novel anti-fibrotic agent pirfenidone suppresses tumor necrosis factor-alpha at the translational level. Eur J Pharmacol (2002) 446(1-3):177–85. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01758-2
194. Oku H, Nakazato H, Horikawa T, Tsuruta Y, Suzuki R. Pirfenidone suppresses tumor necrosis factor-alpha, enhances interleukin-10 and protects mice from endotoxic shock. Eur J Pharmacol (2002) 446(1-3):167–76. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01757-0
195. Visner GA, Liu F, Bizargity P, Liu H, Liu K, Yang J, et al. Pirfenidone inhibits T-cell activation, proliferation, cytokine and chemokine production, and host alloresponses. Transplantation (2009) 88(3):330–8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ae3392
196. Bizargity P, Liu K, Wang L, Hancock WW, Visner GA. Inhibitory effects of pirfenidone on dendritic cells and lung allograft rejection. Transplantation (2012) 94(2):114–22. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182584879
197. Du J, Paz K, Flynn R, Vulic A, Robinson TM, Lineburg KE, et al. Pirfenidone ameliorates murine chronic GVHD through inhibition of macrophage infiltration and TGF-beta production. Blood (2017) 129(18):2570–80. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-758854
198. Aboulkheyr Es H, Zhand S, Thiery JP, Warkiani ME. Pirfenidone reduces immune-suppressive capacity of cancer-associated fibroblasts through targeting CCL17 and TNF-beta. Integr Biol (Camb) (2020) 12(7):188–97. doi: 10.1093/intbio/zyaa014
199. Wollin L, Wex E, Pautsch A, Schnapp G, Hostettler KE, Stowasser S, et al. Mode of action of nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2015) 45(5):1434–45. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00174914
200. Hilberg F, Tontsch-Grunt U, Baum A, Le AT, Doebele RC, Lieb S, et al. Triple Angiokinase Inhibitor Nintedanib Directly Inhibits Tumor Cell Growth and Induces Tumor Shrinkage via Blocking Oncogenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2018) 364(3):494–503. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.244129
201. Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med (2014) 370(22):2071–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402584
202. Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, Douillard JY, Orlov S, Krzakowski M, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2014) 15(2):143–55. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70586-2
203. Awasthi N, Schwarz RE. Profile of nintedanib in the treatment of solid tumors: the evidence to date. Onco Targets Ther (2015) 8:3691–701. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S78805
204. Reck M, Mellemgaard A, von Pawel J, Gottfried M, Bondarenko I, Cheng Y, et al. Anti-angiogenic-specific adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nintedanib and docetaxel. Lung Cancer (2015) 90(2):267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.08.003
205. du Bois A, Huober J, Stopfer P, Pfisterer J, Wimberger P, Loibl S, et al. A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of oral BIBF 1120 combined with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies. Ann Oncol (2010) 21(2):370–5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp506
206. Doebele RC, Conkling P, Traynor AM, Otterson GA, Zhao Y, Wind S, et al. A phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol (2012) 23(8):2094–102. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr596
207. Quintela-Fandino M, Urruticoechea A, Guerra J, Gil M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Marquez R, et al. Phase I clinical trial of nintedanib plus paclitaxel in early HER-2-negative breast cancer (CNIO-BR-01-2010/GEICAM-2010-10 study). Br J Cancer (2014) 111(6):1060–4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.397
208. Reguera-Nunez E, Man S, Xu P, Hilberg F, Kerbel RS. Variable impact of three different antiangiogenic drugs alone or in combination with chemotherapy on multiple bone marrow-derived cell populations involved in angiogenesis and immunity. Angiogenesis (2019) 22(4):535–46. doi: 10.1007/s10456-019-09677-x
209. Overed-Sayer C, Miranda E, Dunmore R, Liarte Marin E, Beloki L, Rassl D, et al. Inhibition of mast cells: a novel mechanism by which nintedanib may elicit anti-fibrotic effects. Thorax (2020) 75(9):754–63. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214000
210. Lukey PT, Harrison SA, Yang S, Man Y, Holman BF, Rashidnasab A, et al. A randomised, placebo-controlled study of omipalisib (PI3K/mTOR) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2019) 53(3):1801992. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01992-2018
211. Hirani N, MacKinnon AC, Nicol L, Ford P, Schambye H, Pedersen A, et al. Target-inhibition of Galectin-3 by Inhaled TD139 in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2020). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02559-2020
212. Knipe RS, Tager AM, Liao JK. The Rho kinases: critical mediators of multiple profibrotic processes and rational targets for new therapies for pulmonary fibrosis. Pharmacol Rev (2015) 67(1):103–17. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009381
213. Maher TM, Costabel U, Glassberg MK, Kondoh Y, Ogura T, Scholand MB, et al. Phase 2 trial to assess lebrikizumab in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2020) 57:1902442. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02442-2019
214. Parker JM, Glaspole IN, Lancaster LH, Haddad TJ, She D, Roseti SL, et al. A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Study of Tralokinumab in Subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2018) 197(1):94–103. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201704-0784OC
215. Wijsenbeek MS, Kool M, Cottin V. Targeting interleukin-13 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from promising path to dead end. Eur Respir J (2018) 52(6):1802111. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02111-2018
216. Raghu G, Richeldi L, Crestani B, Wung P, Bejuit R, Esperet C, et al. SAR156597 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a phase 2 placebo-controlled study (DRI11772). Eur Respir J (2018) 52(6):1801130. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01130-2018
217. Raghu G, Brown KK, Collard HR, Cottin V, Gibson KF, Kaner RJ, et al. Efficacy of simtuzumab versus placebo in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med (2017) 5(1):22–32. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30421-0
218. Raghu G, Martinez FJ, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, Wells AU, et al. CC-chemokine ligand 2 inhibition in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a phase 2 trial of carlumab. Eur Respir J (2015) 46(6):1740–50. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01558-2014
219. Khalil N, Manganas H, Ryerson CJ, Shapera S, Cantin AM, Hernandez P, et al. Phase 2 clinical trial of PBI-4050 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2019) 53(3):1800663. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00663-2018
220. Palmer SM, Snyder L, Todd JL, Soule B, Christian R, Anstrom K, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial of BMS-986020, a Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest (2018) 154(5):1061–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1058
221. Maher TM, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Brown KK, Wuyts W, Verbruggen N, et al. Rationale, design and objectives of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ISABELA 1 and 2). BMJ Open Respir Res (2019) 6(1):e000422. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000422
222. Dillingh MR, van den Blink B, Moerland M, van Dongen MG, Levi M, Kleinjan A, et al. Recombinant human serum amyloid P in healthy volunteers and patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther (2013) 26(6):672–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.01.008
223. Kondoh Y, Azuma A, Inoue Y, Ogura T, Sakamoto S, Tsushima K, et al. Thrombomodulin Alfa for Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2020) 201(9):1110–9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1818OC
224. Anstrom KJ, Noth I, Flaherty KR, Edwards RH, Albright J, Baucom A, et al. Design and rationale of a multi-center, pragmatic, open-label randomized trial of antimicrobial therapy - the study of clinical efficacy of antimicrobial therapy strategy using pragmatic design in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (CleanUP-IPF) clinical trial. Respir Res (2020) 21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-1326-1
225. Durheim MT, Collard HR, Roberts RS, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, King TE Jr, et al. Association of hospital admission and forced vital capacity endpoints with survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: analysis of a pooled cohort from three clinical trials. Lancet Respir Med (2015) 3(5):388–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00093-4
226. Behr J, Kolb M, Song JW, Luppi F, Schinzel B, Stowasser S, et al. Nintedanib and Sildenafil in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Right Heart Dysfunction. A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial (INSTAGE). Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2019) 200(12):1505–12. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0488OC
227. Sgalla G, Franciosa C, Simonetti J, Richeldi L. Pamrevlumab for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs (2020) 29(8):771–7. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1773790
228. Duitman J, van den Ende T, Spek CA. Immune Checkpoints as Promising Targets for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis? J Clin Med (2019) 8(10):1547. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101547
229. Ng B, Dong J, D’Agostino G, Viswanathan S, Widjaja AA, Lim WW, et al. Interleukin-11 is a therapeutic target in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Transl Med (2019) 11(511):eaaw1237. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw1237
230. Kumar A, Kapnadak SG, Girgis RE, Raghu G. Lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Expert Rev Respir Med (2018) 12(5):375–85. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1462704
231. Valapour M, Lehr CJ, Skeans MA, Smith JM, Carrico R, Uccellini K, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Lung. Am J Transplant (2018) 18 Suppl 1:363–433. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14562
232. Villavicencio MA, Axtell AL, Osho A, Astor T, Roy N, Melnitchouk S, et al. Single- Versus Double-Lung Transplantation in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Impact of Age and Pulmonary Hypertension. Ann Thorac Surg (2018) 106(3):856–63. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.060
233. Tuyls S, Verleden SE, Wuyts WA, Yserbyt J, Vos R, Verleden GM. Determinants of survival in lung transplantation patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int (2019) 32(4):399–409. doi: 10.1111/tri.13382
234. Fernandez IE, Heinzelmann K, Verleden S, Eickelberg O. Characteristic patterns in the fibrotic lung. Comparing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Ann Am Thorac Soc (2015) 12 Suppl 1:S34–41. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-476MG
235. Kingsley CI, Karim M, Bushell AR, Wood KJ. CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells prevent graft rejection: CTLA-4- and IL-10-dependent immunoregulation of alloresponses. J Immunol (2002) 168(3):1080–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.3.1080
236. Highfill SL, Rodriguez PC, Zhou Q, Goetz CA, Koehn BH, Veenstra R, et al. Bone marrow myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) inhibit graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) via an arginase-1-dependent mechanism that is up-regulated by interleukin-13. Blood (2010) 116(25):5738–47. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-287839
237. Meng F, Chen S, Guo X, Chen Z, Huang X, Lai Y, et al. Clinical significance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human renal transplantation with acute T cell-mediated rejection. Inflammation (2014) 37(5):1799–805. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-9910-5
238. Luan Y, Mosheir E, Menon MC, Wilson D, Woytovich C, Ochando J, et al. Monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells accumulate in renal transplant patients and mediate CD4(+) Foxp3(+) Treg expansion. Am J Transplant (2013) 13(12):3123–31. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12461
239. Li W, Bribriesco AC, Nava RG, Brescia AA, Ibricevic A, Spahn JH, et al. Lung transplant acceptance is facilitated by early events in the graft and is associated with lymphoid neogenesis. Mucosal Immunol (2012) 5(5):544–54. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.30
240. Li W, Gauthier JM, Higashikubo R, Hsiao HM, Tanaka S, Vuong L, et al. Bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue-resident Foxp3+ T lymphocytes prevent antibody-mediated lung rejection. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(2):556–68. doi: 10.1172/JCI122083
241. Salman J, Ius F, Knoefel AK, Sommer W, Siemeni T, Kuehn C, et al. Association of Higher CD4(+) CD25(high) CD127(low) , FoxP3(+) , and IL-2(+) T Cell Frequencies Early After Lung Transplantation With Less Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction at Two Years. Am J Transplant (2017) 17(6):1637–48. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14148
242. Botturi K, Lacoeuille Y, Thomas P, Boniface S, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Magnan A. CTLA-4-mediated regulatory phenotype of T-cells in tolerant lung recipients. Eur Respir J (2008) 31(6):1167–76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00093207
243. Heigl T, Singh A, Saez-Gimenez B, Kaes J, Van Herck A, Sacreas A, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Lung Transplantation. Front Immunol (2019) 10:900. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00900
244. Wortel CM, Heidt S. Regulatory B cells: Phenotype, function and role in transplantation. Transpl Immunol (2017) 41:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2017.02.004
245. Piloni D, Morosini M, Magni S, Balderacchi A, Inghilleri S, Cova E, et al. Peripheral CD19+CD24(high)CD38(high) B-regulatory cells in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol (2019) 57:101245. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2019.101245
246. Nakajima D, Watanabe Y, Ohsumi A, Pipkin M, Chen M, Mordant P, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant (2019) 38(11):1214–23. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.07.006
247. D’Aveni M, Notarantonio AB, Bertrand A, Boulange L, Pochon C, Rubio MT. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in the Context of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Front Immunol (2020) 11:989. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00989
248. MacDonald KP, Rowe V, Clouston AD, Welply JK, Kuns RD, Ferrara JL, et al. Cytokine expanded myeloid precursors function as regulatory antigen-presenting cells and promote tolerance through IL-10-producing regulatory T cells. J Immunol (2005) 174(4):1841–50. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.1841
249. Perobelli SM, Mercadante AC, Galvani RG, Goncalves-Silva T, Alves AP, Pereira-Neves A, et al. G-CSF-Induced Suppressor IL-10+ Neutrophils Promote Regulatory T Cells That Inhibit Graft-Versus-Host Disease in a Long-Lasting and Specific Way. J Immunol (2016) 197(9):3725–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502023
250. Wang X, Bi Y, Xue L, Liao J, Chen X, Lu Y, et al. The calcineurin-NFAT axis controls allograft immunity in myeloid-derived suppressor cells through reprogramming T cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol (2015) 35(3):598–609. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01251-14
251. Iglesias-Escudero M, Sansegundo-Arribas D, Riquelme P, Merino-Fernandez D, Guiral-Foz S, Perez C, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Effect of Maintenance Immunotherapy. Front Immunol (2020) 11:643. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00643
252. Dong M, Wang X, Liu J, Zhao YX, Chen XL, Li KQ, et al. Rapamycin Combined with Immature Dendritic Cells Attenuates Obliterative Bronchiolitis in Trachea Allograft Rats by Regulating the Balance of Regulatory and Effector T Cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol (2015) 167(3):177–85. doi: 10.1159/000437207
Keywords: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, pharmacotherapy, transplantation
Citation: van Geffen C, Deißler A, Quante M, Renz H, Hartl D and Kolahian S (2021) Regulatory Immune Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Friends or Foes? Front. Immunol. 12:663203. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.663203
Received: 02 February 2021; Accepted: 22 March 2021;
Published: 22 April 2021.
Edited by:
Enrico Conte, University of Catania, ItalyReviewed by:
Eliza Tsitoura, University of Crete, GreeceAdam Byrne, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2021 van Geffen, Deißler, Quante, Renz, Hartl and Kolahian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Saeed Kolahian, saeed.kolahian@med.uni-tuebingen.de