Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 15 June 2021
Sec. Mucosal Immunity
This article is part of the Research Topic Mechanisms of Lung Fibrosis: is Immunity Back in the Game? View all 13 articles

Enhanced IL-1β Release Following NLRP3 and AIM2 Inflammasome Stimulation Is Linked to mtROS in Airway Macrophages in Pulmonary Fibrosis

  • 1Respiratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
  • 2Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • 3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 4Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Fibrotic Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are complex disorders of variable clinical behaviour. The majority of them cause significant morbidity, whilst Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is recognised as the most relentless. NLRP3, AIM2, and NLRC4 inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes driving IL-1β release; a proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokine. Several pathogenetic factors associated with IPF are identified as inflammasome activators, including increases in mtROS and bacterial burden. Mitochondrial oxidation and alterations in bacterial burden in IPF and other ILDs may lead to augmented inflammasome activity in airway macrophages (AMs). IPF (n=14), non-IPF-ILDs (n=12) patients and healthy subjects (n=12) were prospectively recruited and AMs were isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage. IL-1β release resulting from NLRP3, AIM2 and NLRC4 inflammasomes stimulation in AMs were determined and baseline levels of mitochondrial ROS and microbial burden were also measured. Our results showed that NLRP3 was more inducible in IPF and other ILDs compared to controls. Additionally, following AIM2 activation IL-1β release was significantly higher in IPF compared to controls, whereas similar trends were observed in Non-IPF-ILDs. NLRC4 activation was similar across groups. mtROS was significantly associated with heightened NLRP3 and AIM2 activation, and mitochondrial antioxidant treatment limited inflammasome activation. Importantly, microbial burden was linked to baseline IL-1β release and AIM2 and IL-18 relative expression independently of mtROS. In conclusion, the above findings suggested a link between the overactivation of NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes, driven by mitochondrial oxidation, in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis while changes in the microbiota may prime the inflammasome in the lungs.

Introduction

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a broad term used to describe multiple complex disorders with different aetiologies and disease behaviours. ILDs are pulmonary fibrotic disorders that affect the lung alveoli causing distraction of the lung parenchyma. The classic paradigm is Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), a devastating chronic lung disease of unknown aetiology (1). An interplay of age dependent deregulation of host defence pathways, immune cell homeostasis and microbiome balance is currently speculated to be the underlying cause of the disease (2). Other ILDs are considered to be driven mostly through inflammatory pathways (2).

In the last decade, the landscape of the IPF behaviour has changed with the discovery of two novel antifibrotic drugs (35). Of note, the two antifibrotic treatments are similarly effective in other progressive ILDs (68). This suggests progressive fibrosis arises from common underlying mechanisms, despite the initial cause, but the exact pathways remain to be identified (9).

Macrophages and monocytes are recognised as drivers of the balance between tissue repair and fibrosis (10). Recent studies in ILD patients have characterised Airway Macrophages (AM) subpopulations which may contribute to different subtypes of pulmonary fibrosis (11). Macrophages, as a source of chemokines and other inflammatory mediators, are responsible for the initial cellular response to injury (12) and can initiate or exacerbate fibrosis (10).

The inflammasome is one central cellular mechanism for chemokine release in macrophages (13). Inflammasomes are cytosolic multiprotein complexes that act as innate immune system sensors. NLRP3, the most studied inflammasome, is activated by a variety of stimuli including ATP, nigericin and ROS (14). Other inflammasomes are more specific and activated by merely one stimulus; NLRC4 by cytosolic Flagellin and AIM2 by cytosolic double stranded DNA (dsDNA) (15). Upon triggering, Inflammasomes cleave pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 to their active forms mainly through caspase-1 (15). IL-1β is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine that can initiate and amplify lung inflammation and has been associated with acute lung injury and fibrosis (1618). Inflammasome activation has been associated with silicosis, asbestosis and pulmonary fibrosis, mostly in mice models (1921).

Mitochondria as drivers of metabolic cascades are increasingly recognised as controllers of macrophage activation status (2225). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and oxidised mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are both critical for NLRP3 activation (25, 26). It is established that mitochondria homeostasis is defective in aged and IPF individuals (27, 28) and their dysfunction contribute directly to fibrosis in mouse models (29). Our group and others have recently demonstrated that mitochondria in AMs are more oxidised in IPF and other ILDs compared to healthy individuals (3032).

Microbiota signalling has been shown to alter mitochondrial metabolism and activate the inflammasome (3335). In IPF, the microbial burden is increased, and its composition is altered (36, 37). Similarly in Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (CHP), bacterial burden is higher, albeit at lower levels compared to IPF (38). These alterations have been linked to host immune response transcriptional changes (39) and variable cytokine secretion (40). Of note, streptococcal infection leads to acute exacerbation of lung fibrosis in mice through AIM2 inflammasome activation (41) while inflammasome activation was dysregulated in BAL cells from ILD patients (42).

In this study we hypothesised that alterations in the lung microenvironment including microbiome changes and mitochondrial dysfunction in AMs could drive excessive inflammasome activation with possible implications in the pathogenesis of ILD disease. As such, we sought to determine whether increased mtROS and microbial burden were associated with inflammasome activity in AMs from ILDs, including IPF.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Inclusion Criteria

Thirty-six (34) patients were prospectively enrolled at the Respiratory Medicine Department at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, between June 2017 to June 2019.

Twelve (12) healthy controls, and twenty-four (24) ILD patients [fourteen (14) patients with IPF and twelve (12) non-IPF patients] were included. Patients with a recent infection (1 month prior to bronchoscopy) were excluded from the study. ILD patients were treatment naïve. All patients underwent bronchoscopy and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) was obtained as part of the diagnostic algorithm.

IPF patients: The diagnosis of IPF was based on either ATS/ERS criteria or the Fleischer Society criteria after Multidisciplinary discussion (22).

Non-IPF patients: Patients with fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases as assessed by the presence of reticulation and traction bronchiectasis on High-Resolution Computed Tomography were included. This category included eight (8) patients with fibrotic chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP), one (1) with asbestosis related ILD, one (1) with Idiopathic pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and two (2) with unclassifiable ILD. Any patients with autoimmune diseases treated with immunosuppressive agents were excluded as immunomodulatory treatment could affect inflammatory responses. All patients were evaluated within one month from bronchoscopy, with Pulmonary Lung Function tests.

Control group: Control subjects were either patients undergoing bronchoscopy for the investigation of haemoptysis, without any overt pulmonary comorbidities, with normal bronchoscopy findings and cytology results or healthy volunteers.

Patient demographics, smocking status, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were prospectively collected and are summarised in Table 1. Since controls were healthy Pulmonary Function Test (PFTs) were not performed.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Patient characteristics.

PFTs. Lung volumes (forced expiratory volume in one second – FEV1, forced vital capacity – FVC), and diffusion capacity (DLco, corrected for haemoglobin) were measured using the computerised system (Jaeger 2.12; MasterLab, Würzburg, Germany). Predicted values were obtained from the standardised lung function testing of the European Coal and Steel Community, Luxembourg (1993).

AM Isolation and Culture

Freshly isolated BALF cells were obtained as previously described (30). BALF contains a diverse population of primarily macrophages and variable levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils. To allow macrophage enrichment, BAL cells were cultured for 1 hour prior to experimentation. For each experimental condition 0.5x106 BALF cells were allowed to attach for 1 hour in 24 well plates in DMEM(Biosera) growth media supplemented with 2% FCS (Biosera) and 1x concentration of penicillin-streptomycin (from 100x concentrated solution, Biosera) in a humidified incubator at 37°C containing 5% CO2 at a concentration of 106 cells/ml, with subsequent washes to remove non-adherent cells. The remaining attached cell population comprised mainly of macrophages and monocytes from the alveolar space.

Inflammasomes Activation

Human macrophages are known to require a two-step mechanism to activate NLRP3; an evolutionary process preventing uncontrolled NLRP3 activation and IL-1β release. The primary TLR-mediated signal activates NF-kappaB (NF-κB) which results in NLRP3, ASC, pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 transcription. The second signal results in proteolytic cleavage of IL-1β and IL-18 by caspase-1 (43).

Here, AMs were primed with 10ng/ml LPS (Liposacccharide E.Coli 0111:B4 strain, Invivogen) to upregulate inflammasome related genes. For NLRP3 activation, cells were primed with LPS for 2 hours and subsequently stimulated with 5 mM ATP(Sigma) for 30 minutes. For the activation of AIM2 and NLRC4 inflammasomes, cells were primed with LPS for 1 hour, followed by transfection with 2 μg/ml dsDNA(naked Poly(dA:dT), InvivoGen) or 0.1ug/ml Ultrapure Flagellin from S. Typhimirium, (InvivoGen) respectively, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) for 4 hours. Inflammasome-specific activation was confirmed using the selective NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950(Cayman) at 1μM, or the caspase-1 inhibitor for the NLRC4 and AIM2 inflammasome (non-selective global inflammasome inhibitor) at 10uM final concentrations, for 1 hour prior to stimulation. The simulation protocol is summarised in Supplementary Figure 1.

For the study of mtROS effect on NLRP3 activation, cells were treated with the selective mitochondrial antioxidant agent MitoTempo (Sigma) at a final concentration of 100μM for 1 hour prior to the addition of ATP.

Supernatants and cell lysates were collected after the appropriate stimulation time. ELISA immunoblot was used to quantify IL-1β, as a surrogate marker of inflammasome activation.

Flow Cytometry and mtROS Determination

Mitochondrial ROS was measured by MitoSOX™Red (Invitrogen) staining. 0.5x106 freshly isolated BALF cells resuspended in RPMI-1640, supplemented with 2% FCS, were stained with MitoSOX Red at a final concentration of 5 μM and CD45-FITC for 10 minutes at 37°C. For MitoSOX staining quantification, AMs populations were selected according to high forward and side scatter and CD45 (FSChighSSChighCD45+) as previously described (30). Identical cell samples were independently stained with Propidium Iodide (PI) at a final concentration of 1ng/ml, for 5 minutes immediately before flow cytometry analysis, for the detection of necrotic/apoptotic cells. The percentage of MitoSOX positive cells was determined by the percent of cells showing FL-2 fluorescence higher than the unstained control, followed by subtraction of the PI positive percentage of cells. Relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated by normalizing the MFI of the FL-2 channel/MitoSOX positive cells by the MFI of the FL-2 channel of the unstained cells since patient samples displayed wide ranges of autofluorescence. (Data were acquired from Beckman Coulter flow cytometer and analysed with FlowJo 8.7).

Bacterial DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene qPCR

Bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene qPCR was performed for quantification of bacterial burden as previously described (36).

Total RNA Extraction and mRNA Expression

1-1.5x106 BALF cells were centrifuged and cell pellets were homogenised in TriReagentTM (MBL) for total RNA extraction, followed by storage at -80°C. Total RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR were performed as previously described (24). GAPDH levels were used as endogenous control for the normalization of mRNA expression levels in BAL samples. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS 25 (IBM) software and graphs were produced using GraphPad Prism 8. Comparisons were made with paired or unpaired student’s t-test, when appropriate. All data were expressed as means with interquartile range unless stated otherwise. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to select an optimal cut point for mtROS. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) analysis measured the association between two variables. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

Ethics Approval and Patient Consent

The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University Hospital of Heraklion (IRB number: 5889). Approval for the study in the UK was obtained from the local research ethics committee (15/SC/0101 and 15-LO-1399). All patients provided written informed consent.

Results

BALF Baseline IL-1β and Inflammasome Components Gene Expression Is Similar in ILDs and Healthy Subjects

Initially, the baseline IL-1β levels were measured in the BAL Fluid (BALF), as a marker of inflammasome pre-activation in the lung microenvironment. Median basal IL-1β concentration in the BALF did not differ significantly between the ILDs and control groups, while some sporadic IL-1β release was detectable in all three groups (Figure 1A). IL-1β secretion by unstimulated freshly isolated AMs was also measured and no differences were observed among the groups (Figure 1B). Furthermore, we assessed the mRNA expression of genes encoding core inflammasome components NLRP3, NLRC4, and AIM2 as well as the gene encoding IL-18 in BALF cells (Figures 1C–F). NLRP3 relative mRNA expression was significantly elevated in Non-IPF ILDs (p=0.03) and tended to be elevated in IPF as well (p=0.1). AIM2, NLCR4 and IL-18 expression was similar between groups.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Baseline characterization of the Inflammasome in BALF cells. (A) IL-1β protein concentration in BAL fluid as measured by ELISA and (B) IL-1β protein release by unstimulated AMs (5-hour culture). Data represented as median with interquartile range Mann-Whitney test. Relative log mRNA expression in unstimulated BALF cells (C) IL18 (D) NLRP3, (E) AIM2, (F) NLRC4. Data represented as mean ± SD, t-test. *p<0.05.

AMs in ILDs Exhibit Enhanced NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation

Typically, monocytes/macrophages require two independent simulation signals to secrete IL-1β in vitro; an NF-κB priming step (signal 1), such as LPS or other TLR4 agonists, which leads to the upregulation of inflammasome pathway related genes, followed by a stimulation with a DAMP or PAMP which acts as a second stimulus (signal 2) and leads to robust IL-1β release. Signal 1 alone is known to activate the NLRP3 in a non-canonical way in human myeloid cells (44, 45).

In this study, for NLRP3 inflammasome activation, AMs were primed with LPS followed by ATP stimulation. Treatment with LPS resulted in a significant release of IL-1β by AMs from all groups (Figure 2A), although no differences between groups were noted (Figure 2A). Upon NLRP3 activation, IPF and non-IPF AMs produced excessive IL-1β compared to controls (p=0.0004 and 0.007 respectively, Figure 2B). Between IPF and Non-IPF patients, NLRP3 activity was similar. This effect was NLRP3 specific, as it was abrogated by MCC950 treatment (Figure 2B), a novel specific NLRP3 inhibitor (46).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Assay of inflammasomes activation in Airway Macrophages (AMs). (A) AMs treated for 5 hours with LPS (B) Activation of NLRP3 upon priming with LPS for 2 hours and ATP for 30minutes. Cells were also treated in presence of the Selective NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 to show specificity of the NLRP3 activation, (C) AMs cultured for 2 hours in serum and treated for 30 minutes with ATP without priming with LPS (D) AIM2 inflammasome activation: 1 hour of LPS priming followed by 4 hours dsDNA transfection, (E) NLRC4 inflammasome activation: 1 hour of LPS priming followed by 4 hours flagellin transfection. For with-in group analysis one-sided paired Wilcoxin test was used. For between group analysis Mann-Whitney test was used. Data presented as median with interquartile range, *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0001.

To determine whether ILD derived AMs were pre-primed by an NF-κB related stimuli in the lungs, we also treated cells with ATP (with no proceeding signal 1). Generally, ATP alone resulted in muted responses compared to LPS/ATP. However, in IPF the addition of ATP was sufficient to generate IL-1β release, compared to healthy controls (p=0.04, Figure 2C). Similar trends were noted in non-IPF ILDs (p=0.1, Figure 2C). When all ILDs were combined, ATP resulted in increased NLRP3 activation compared to controls (p=0.04).

AIM2 and NLRC4 Activation

For AIM2 activation, cells were primed with LPS followed by transfection with dsDNA. In all three groups the addition of dsDNA resulted in significant IL-1β release (Figure 2D). IL-1β production following dsDNA stimulation was significantly elevated in IPF compared to healthy controls (p=0.04) whilst a similar trend was observed for the Non-IPF patients (p=0.09) (Figure 2D).

It was recently suggested that in human myeloid cells, in contrast to mice, dsDNA activates the cGAS-STING pathway. This action potentiates lysosomal damage and in turn activates the NLRP3 rather than the AIM2 inflammasome (47). To address this possibility, cells were treated with dsDNA in the presence of MCC950 and a significant inhibition of IL-1β release was observed (Supplementary Figure 2A). To test further the above hypothesis of STING-mediated lysosomal damage, cells were treated with chloroquine, a lysosomal acidification inhibitor that blocks lysosomal induced cell death. Chloroquine inhibited dsDNA-mediated inflammasome activation (Supplementary Figure 1A).

For the activation of NLRC4, cells were primed with LPS, followed by flagellin transfection. The activation of NLRC4 inflammasome was similar across groups (Figure 2E). To confirm the specificity of NLRC4 activation in AMs, both the pan-inflammasome Caspase-1 inhibitor and the NLRP3 specific inhibitor-MCC950 were tested. NLRC4 stimulation resulted in IL-1β release in a caspase-1 dependent and NLRP3-independent manner (Supplementary Figure 2B).

NLRP3 and AIM2 Activation Is Associated With Mitochondrial Oxidation and Can Be Inhibited by Antioxidant Treatment

MtROS is widely recognised as an inducer of inflammasome activation and it was previously shown that mtROS is elevated in IPF and Non-IPF AMs (30, 32). It was therefore hypothesised that elevated mtROS could be associated with higher NLRP3 inflammasome activity in ILDs. The levels of mtROS in fresh untreated AMs was measured by flow cytometry using MitoSOX™red. MtROS was higher in ILD-AMs (IPF and Non-IPF) compared to controls (p=0.03, Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Mitochondrial Oxidation status and the inflammasome. (A) MtROS Mean Florescence Intensity Index (MFI) as assessed by flowcytometry in healthy and ILD patients. ILD Patients were categorised according to MtROS MFI using the cut-off value of 1.5(generated by ROC curve). Comparisons on inflammasome activation were made in MtROS high and low groups (B) NLRP3 activation without LPS priming, (C) NLRP3 activation with LPS priming, (D) AIM2 activation (LPS priming followed by dsDNA transfection). Data presented as median with interquartile range, *p<0.05, **p<0.005, Mann-Whitney test.

Using ROC curves the optimal cut-off value for mtROS level was determined and ILD-AMs samples were stratified according to high or low mtROS. AMs exhibiting high mtROS showed enhanced NLRP3 activation in the absence of LPS priming (p=0.004, Figure 3B) and there was also a trend for greater NLRP3 activation in LPS-primed AMs (p=0.08) (Figure 3C). AIM2 activation was likewise significantly heightened in AMs with high mtROS (p= 0.02) (Figure 3D).

Interestingly, in vitro stimulation of AMs with LPS and ATP coincided with a burst of mtROS (Figures 4A, B). We subsequently sought to determine whether antioxidant treatment could inhibit IL-1β release by AMs. Treatment with mitoTempo a mitochondria-targeting antioxidant significantly inhibited mtROS accumulation (Figures 4A, B) and blocked NLRP3 activation, as assessed by IL-1β release (Figure 4C).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Mitochondrial antioxidant treatment effect on inflammasome activation. AMs were treated with MitoTempo (100μM), a mitochondrial antioxidant for 1 hour prior to the addition of ATP. Cells were subsequently treated with ATP for 30minutes. (A) Representative histograms of freshly isolated AMs from ILD subjects, labelled with CD45-FITC and MitoSOX Red analysed by flowcytometry. AMs were selected and percentage of MitoSOX positive cells and mean fluorescence intensities were analysed relative to CD45-FITC labelled populations (grey histograms). AMs were either left untreated(i), treated with (ii) LPS/ATP for NLRP3 activation or (iii) MitoTempo and LPS/ATP. (B) MitoSox (assessed by flow-cytometry) and (C) IL-1β release measured at baseline, after NLRP3 activation and after NLRP3 activation in the presence of MitoTempo (100μM), Data presented as median with interquartile range, *p<0.05 **p<0.005, Paired Wilcoxon test.

Microbial Burden Is Associated With Baseline AIM2 and IL-18 Gene Expression and Il-1β Release

In IPF, it is established that microbial burden is increased and this correlates with disease progression (36, 37). In CHP, microbial burden is also elevated compared to health but at lower levels compared to IPF (38). We hypothesised that microbiota fluctuations in the lung microenvironment could be priming the inflammasomes. BALF microbial burden, as assessed by 16S rRNA gene copies, increased in ILDs relative to healthy individuals (p=0.03) (Figure 5A). Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene copies significantly correlated with IL-1β secretion in unstimulated AMs (R2:0.53; p=0.02)(Figure 5B) and AIM2 (R2: 0.68 p=0.004, Figure 5C) and IL-18 (R2: 0.59 p=0.015, Figure 5D) relative mRNA expression. There was no association between bacterial burden and mtROS.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Bacterial burden and the inflammasome. (A) Bacterial burden in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of healthy and ILD subjects. Bacterial burden calculated by qPCR and expressed as log10 (16S rRNA gene copies/ml of BAL). Mann-Whitney test. Data are presented as median and interquartile range, *p<0.05. Illustrating correlation between bacterial burden and (B) IL-1β release from AMs (Spearman correlation) and (C) AIM2 and (D) IL-18 log relative mRNA expression (Pearson Correlation).

Discussion

In this study we demonstrated that AMs in pulmonary fibrosis secrete abundantly IL-1β following stimulation of the NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes compared to healthy subjects. Several factors that could be involved in inflammasomes stimulation have been previously identified in IPF, including increased mtROS and increased microbiome burden. This study showed that higher mtROS was associated with pronounced NLRP3 and AIM2 activation which could be inhibited by antioxidant therapy. Furthermore, BALF microbial burden correlated with baseline IL-1β production, AIM2 and IL-18 relative mRNA expression.

The overactivation of the inflammasome has multiple implications in health and disease. Several animal model studies have suggested that NLRP3 activation and subsequent IL-1β release can induce acute lung injury and fibrosis (4850). In mice models the NLRP3/IL1-b axis is required for the development of bleomycin induced fibrosis (49). In silicosis there is a clear link between NLRP3 and the development of the disease (51). Furthermore, in mice age-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction results in enhanced NLRP3 activation and lung fibrosis (20). In this study we provide evidence of an implication of NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome in patients with lung fibrosis.

ROS generation by the mitochondria is a well-known trigger of the NLRP3 with mitochondrial death and mitochondrial DNA acting as activators (25). Mitochondrial dysfunction has emerged as a driver of IPF pathogenesis. Mitochondria in IPF AMs have morphological defects and are oxidised (30). Similarly, mtROS is elevated in other ILDs (32). To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to show that in ILD-AMs NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome are hyper-inducible and this is associated with mitochondrial oxidation, a hallmark of IPF pathogenesis. In agreement with previous studies (26), we showed that mtROS is crucial for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in patient derived-AMs, since antioxidant treatment inhibits IL-1β release.

It is established that a priming step is required for the activation of the inflammasome which results in the overexpression of several inflammasome components (43). The second signal results in the release of active IL-1β. ROS can act as a direct NLRP3 activator (52), while other studies have suggested that ROS could also exert its role at the priming step (24). Of note, treatment with ATP without LPS pre-stimulation resulted in pronounced IL-1β release in ILDs compared to controls. Furthermore, inflammasome was more inducible in patients with higher mtROS levels, in the absence of LPS priming. This implies that mitochondrial oxidation may be priming the inflammasome in lung fibrosis.

Mitochondria are in the core of metabolic switches in macrophages fighting bacterial infections (53) and a burst of mtROS is crucial for their antibacterial responses (51). By contrast, mitochondrial damage results in deregulated and diminished antioxidant responses to bacteria (54). It is recognised that microbiota are altered in IPF (55, 56). In this study, microbial burden, which is known to be increased in ILDs, was not associated with mtROS, indicating that microbiota changes were not likely the cause of the observed mitochondrial oxidation. The microbial burden was however associated with baseline IL-1β release as well as AIM2 and IL-18 mRNA expression in lung fibrosis.

AIM2 inflammasome was recently linked to the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis and progression. Notably, AIM2 is overexpressed in IPF-AMs and this is related to increased Drosha ribonuclease III (DROSHA), a class 2 ribonuclease III enzyme expression (57). Interestingly, a previous study showed that in IPF, peripheral mononuclear cells stimulated to activate the AIM2 released high concentrations of pro-fibrotic mediators and most importantly IL- 1α (58). Of particular interest, GLUT-1 dependent glycolysis promotes exacerbation of lung fibrosis during S. pneumoniae infection via AIM2 activation (41) and several studies have suggested a relative abundance of Streptococcus genera in IPF (37, 38, 56). A novel finding of our study is that AIM2 activation is increased in IPF and tended to be higher in other fibrotic ILDs. AIM2 activation was enhanced in patients with higher mtROS and an increase in the bacterial burden was associated with baseline AIM2 expression

For years, AIM2 was recognised as the central DNA-responding inflammasome. Recent evidence suggests that AIM2 might not be functional in human immune cells in contrast to murine models (47). Researchers showed that cytosolic DNA causes lysosomal damage and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome through the STING mediated cell death pathway. In our experiments, addition of dsDNA resulted in significant release of IL-1β in all groups. Inhibition of NLRP3 with MCC950, a specific NLRP3 inhibitor, resulted in partial reduction of IL-1β release, as such suggesting that dsDNA activation is to a degree NLRP3-dependent. We also showed that higher mtROS was associated with higher IL-1β production following dsDNA treatment, a result which could be driven by NLRP3 activation rather than AIM2.

In contrast to NLRP3 and AIM2, NLRC4 activation was similar across groups. NLRC4 activation was caspase-1 dependent and NLRP3 independent. A previous transcriptional study in IPF, showed that NLRC4 expression is increased in the peripheral blood and highly associated with increased microbial burden in the lungs (39). Here we focused on AMs and failed to notice overexpression or overactivation of the NLRC4 inflammasome either at baseline or upon stimulation.

Our study sheds light into the pathogenesis of acute exacerbations, a well-recognised complication of IPF and other ILDs (59, 60), characterised by rapid deterioration and death. The pathogenesis of acute exacerbations is not well characterised but is thought to resemble acute lung injury in response to infections or sterile insults (60, 61). Microbiota changes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IPF exacerbations (37, 56, 62). It is well established that dysregulated NLRP3 inflammasome activity results in uncontrolled inflammation and can cause acute lung injury and fibrosis (18, 50). Intriguingly, a transcriptomic study identified NLRP3 and IL-1β among the top up-regulated genes in AE-IPF (63).

This study indicates that in ILDs NLRP3 and AIM2 can be overactivated. Basal AIM2 and IL-18 mRNA expression and IL-1β production was correlated with the bacterial burden in the BALF. Although, it is difficult to prove a direct causal relationship between microbial burden and inflammasome activation, we speculated that microbiota changes prime the inflammasome in the lungs. It is established that microbiota dysbiosis influence systematic immune responses (64) and gut-microbiota changes shape cytokine release from leukocytes (65). More specifically in IPF, disruption of the lung microbiome was associated with variable cytokine production leading to lung inflammation and fibrosis progression (40). Targeting NLRP3, AIM2 or their ultimate effector, IL-1β and IL-18 (66) may prove a novel treatment for ILD exacerbations, which are still considered lethal in most cases.

The main limitation of this study is related to the small number of patients recruited, as differences among different types of lung fibrosis were not established. However, even in this small cohort, we were able to identify changes in lung fibrosis compared to health. Furthermore, different macrophage/monocyte populations exist in the lungs especially following a fibrotic insult (67). It is likely that one or more subpopulations drive the observed excessive inflammasome activation. As such, separation of the different AM populations and subsequent stimulations might be informative of the role of each subpopulation in the disease pathogenesis. One further limitation of our study is the measurement of IL-1β alone and not IL-18 as a marker of inflammasome stimulation. We opted to measure only IL-1β as it is considered a robust marker of inflammasome activation and has generally been associated with initiation and progression of fibrosis. Importantly, IL-1β is not constitutively expressed under homeostasis (68) and has detrimental effects on epithelial cells if over-released (69). Finally, although inflammasome activation in lung fibrosis was increased, we cannot determine whether this plays a causal role in disease progression, nor can we exclude that other factors may relate to the increased inflammasome activation observed here.

In conclusion, this is the first study to show that NLRP3 and AIM2 activation is heightened in ILD-AMs and this is linked to mitochondrial oxidation. Microbial burden is associated to some extent with pre-activation of the inflammasome. Our findings provide evidence of excessive AM-inflammatory response upon activation which could contribute to the progression of fibrosis. Targeting the inflammasome pathway may prove a novel strategy for ILD treatment or a rescue therapy during acute exacerbations of the disease.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University Hospital of Heraklion (IRB number: 5889). Approval for the study in the UK was obtained from the local research ethics committee (15/SC/0101 and 15-LO-1399). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: AT, ET, KA. Analysis interpretation and drafting the manuscript: AT, ET, KA. TM, PM. Technical support and interpretation of the data: AT, ET, SM, RI, EV, EB. All authors critically revised the manuscript and take responsibility for the data presented. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by a Hellenic Thoracic Society Research Award (AT, KA HTS 2017). AT is the recipient of an ERS fellowship STFR (STRTF201904-00633).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.661811/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

AECIIs, alveolar epithelial cells; AIM2, Absent in melanoma 2; AMs, Airway Macrophages; ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; CHP, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; BALF, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; dsDNA, double stranded DNA; IPF, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NLRC4, NLR Family CARD Domain Containing 4; NLRP3, NOD-, leucine rich region- and pyrin domain-containing-3; NLR, NOD-Like receptor; mtROS, Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species.

References

1. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, King TE, Lynch DA, Nicholson AG, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Update of the International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 188(6):733–48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Pardo A, Selman M. Lung Fibroblasts, Aging, and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc (2016) 13(Suppl 5):S417–s21. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-341AW

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Margaritopoulos GA, Trachalaki A, Wells AU, Vasarmidi E, Bibaki E, Papastratigakis G, et al. Pirfenidone Improves Survival in IPF: Results From a Real-Life Study. BMC Pulm Med (2018) 18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0736-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Antoniou K, Markopoulou K, Tzouvelekis A, Trachalaki A, Vasarmidi E, Organtzis J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in a Greek Multicentre Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry: A Retrospective, Observational, Cohort Study. ERJ Open Res (2020) 6(1):00172–2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00172-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Trachalaki A, Irfan M, Wells AU. Pharmacological Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Current and Emerging Options. Expert Opin Pharmacother (2020) 22(2):191–204. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1822326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Brown KK, Martinez FJ, Walsh SLF, Thannickal VJ, Prasse A, Schlenker-Herceg R, et al. The Natural History of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Eur Respir J (2020) 55(6):2000085. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00085-2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wells AU, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Inoue Y, Devaraj A, Richeldi L, et al. Nintedanib in Patients With Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases—subgroup Analyses by Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis in the INBUILD Trial: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(5):453–60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30036-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Maher TM, Corte TJ, Fischer A, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Molina-Molina M, et al. Pirfenidone in Patients With Unclassifiable Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(2):147–57. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30341-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wollin L, Distler JHW, Redente EF, Riches DWH, Stowasser S, Schlenker-Herceg R, et al. Potential of Nintedanib in Treatment of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Eur Respir J (2019) 54(3):1900161. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00161-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis. Immunity (2016) 44(3):450–62. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Morse C, Tabib T, Sembrat J, Buschur KL, Bittar HT, Valenzi E, et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-Expressing Macrophages in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur Respir J (2019) 54(2):1802441. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02441-2018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wynn TA, Barron L. Macrophages: Master Regulators of Inflammation and Fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis (2010) 30(3):245–57. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Guermonprez P, Helft J. Inflammasome Activation: A Monocyte Lineage Privilege. Nat Immunol (2019) 20(4):383–5. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0348-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Stutz A, Kolbe C-C, Stahl R, Horvath GL, Franklin BS, van Ray O, et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Assembly is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the Pyrin Domain. J Exp Med (2017) 214(6):1725–36. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JPY. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of Action, Role in Disease, and Therapeutics. Nat Med (2015) 21:677. doi: 10.1038/nm.3893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wu J, Yan Z, Schwartz DE, Yu J, Malik AB, Hu G. Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alveolar Macrophages Contributes to Mechanical Stretch-Induced Lung Inflammation and Injury. J Immunol (2013) 190(7):3590–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dinarello CA. Biologic Basis for Interleukin-1 in Disease. Blood (1996) 87(6):2095–147. doi: 10.1182/blood.V87.6.2095.bloodjournal8762095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kolb M, Margetts PJ, Anthony DC, Pitossi F, Gauldie J. Transient Expression of IL-1beta Induces Acute Lung Injury and Chronic Repair Leading to Pulmonary Fibrosis. J Clin Invest (2001) 107(12):1529–36. doi: 10.1172/JCI12568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Dostert C, Pétrilli V, Van Bruggen R, Steele C, Mossman BT, Tschopp J. Innate Immune Activation Through Nalp3 Inflammasome Sensing of Asbestos and Silica. Science (2008) 320(5876):674. doi: 10.1126/science.1156995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Stout-Delgado HW, Cho SJ, Chu SG, Mitzel DN, Villalba J, El-Chemaly S, et al. Age-Dependent Susceptibility to Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Associated With NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2016) 55(2):252–63. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0222OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Cassel SL, Eisenbarth SC, Iyer SS, Sadler JJ, Colegio OR, Tephly LA, et al. The Nalp3 Inflammasome is Essential for the Development of Silicosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2008) 105(26):9035–40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803933105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ouimet M, Ediriweera HN, Gundra UM, Sheedy FJ, Ramkhelawon B, Hutchison SB, et al. MicroRNA-33-dependent Regulation of Macrophage Metabolism Directs Immune Cell Polarization in Atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest (2015) 125(12):4334–48. doi: 10.1172/JCI81676

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Galván-Peña S, O’Neill LAJ. Metabolic Reprograming in Macrophage Polarization. Front Immunol (2014) 5:420. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhong Z, Liang S, Sanchez-Lopez E, He F, Shalapour S, X-j L, et al. New Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis Enables NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Nature (2018) 560(7717):198–203. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0372-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Shimada K, Crother TR, Karlin J, Dagvadorj J, Chiba N, Chen S, et al. Oxidized Mitochondrial DNA Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome During Apoptosis. Immunity (2012) 36(3):401–14. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A Role for Mitochondria in NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Nature (2011) 469(7329):221–5. doi: 10.1038/nature09663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Baumann K. Ageing: The Yin and Yang of Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2016) 17(6):331. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.71

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rangarajan S, Bernard K, Thannickal VJ. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc (2017) 14(Supplement_5):S383–8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201705-370AW

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bueno M, Lai Y-C, Romero Y, Brands J, St Croix CM, Kamga C, et al. PINK1 Deficiency Impairs Mitochondrial Homeostasis and Promotes Lung Fibrosis. J Clin Invest (2015) 125(2):521–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI74942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Tsitoura E, Vasarmidi E, Bibaki E, Trachalaki A, Koutoulaki C, Papastratigakis G, et al. Accumulation of Damaged Mitochondria in Alveolar Macrophages With Reduced OXPHOS Related Gene Expression in IPF. Respir Res (2019) 20(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1196-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Larson-Casey JL, Deshane JS, Ryan AJ, Thannickal VJ, Carter AB. Macrophage Akt1 Kinase-Mediated Mitophagy Modulates Apoptosis Resistance and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Immunity (2016) 44(3):582–96. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Vasarmidi E, Tsitoura E, Mastrodemou S, Trachalaki A, Tzanakis N, Antoniou K. Levels of Oxidised Mitochondria in BAL Macrophages in Fibrotic Ilds. Eur Respir J (2020) 56(suppl 64):603. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.603

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Shekhova E. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species as Major Effectors of Antimicrobial Immunity. PLoS Pathog (2020) 16(5):e1008470. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hirose M, Künstner A, Schilf P, Sünderhauf A, Rupp J, Jöhren O, et al. Mitochondrial Gene Polymorphism Is Associated With Gut Microbial Communities in Mice. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):15293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15377-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Harijith A, Ebenezer DL, Natarajan V. Reactive Oxygen Species At the Crossroads of Inflammasome and Inflammation. Front Physiol (2014) 5:352–. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Invernizzi R, Barnett J, Rawal B, Nair A, Ghai P, Kingston S, et al. Bacterial Burden n the Lower Airways Predicts Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Is Independent of Radiological Disease Extent. Eur Respir J (2020) 55:1901519. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01519-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Molyneaux PL, Cox MJ, Willis-Owen SA, Mallia P, Russell KE, Russell AM, et al. The Role of Bacteria in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2014) 190(8):906–13. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0541OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Invernizzi R, Wu BG, Barnett J, Ghai P, Kingston S, Hewitt RJ, et al. The Respiratory Microbiome in Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Is Distinct From That of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2020) 203(3):339–47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0460OC

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Molyneaux PL, Willis-Owen SAG, Cox MJ, James P, Cowman S, Loebinger M, et al. Host-Microbial Interactions in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2017) 195(12):1640–50. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1408OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. O’Dwyer DN, Ashley SL, Gurczynski SJ, Xia M, Wilke C, Falkowski NR, et al. Lung Microbiota Contribute to Pulmonary Inflammation and Disease Progression in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2019) 199(9):1127–38. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1650OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cho SJ, Moon J-S, Nikahira K, Yun HS, Harris R, Hong KS, et al. GLUT1-Dependent Glycolysis Regulates Exacerbation of Fibrosis Via AIM2 Inflammasome Activation. Thorax (2020) 75(3):227. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lasithiotaki I, Giannarakis I, Tsitoura E, Samara KD, Margaritopoulos GA, Choulaki C, et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Rheumatoid Lung. Eur Respir J (2016) 47(3):910–8. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00564-2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bauernfeind FG, Horvath G, Stutz A, Alnemri ES, MacDonald K, Speert D, et al. Cutting Edge: NF-kappaB Activating Pattern Recognition and Cytokine Receptors License NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation by Regulating NLRP3 Expression. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2009) 183(2):787–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901363

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Gaidt Moritz M, Ebert Thomas S, Chauhan D, Schmidt T, Schmid-Burgk Jonathan L, Rapino F, et al. Human Monocytes Engage an Alternative Inflammasome Pathway. Immunity (2016) 44(4):833–46. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Netea MG, Nold-Petry CA, Nold MF, Joosten LAB, Opitz B, van der Meer JHM, et al. Differential Requirement for the Activation of the Inflammasome for Processing and Release of IL-1beta in Monocytes and Macrophages. Blood (2009) 113(10):2324–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-146720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Coll RC, Robertson AA, Chae JJ, Higgins SC, Munoz-Planillo R, Inserra MC, et al. A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of the NLRP3 Inflammasome for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. Nat Med (2015) 21(3):248–55. doi: 10.1038/nm.3806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Gaidt MM, Ebert TS, Chauhan D, Ramshorn K, Pinci F, Zuber S, et al. The DNA Inflammasome in Human Myeloid Cells Is Initiated by a STING-Cell Death Program Upstream of NLRP3. Cell (2017) 171(5):1110–24.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hoshino T, Okamoto M, Sakazaki Y, Kato S, Young HA, Aizawa H. Role of Proinflammatory Cytokines IL-18 and IL-1beta in Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury in Humans and Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2009) 41(6):661–70. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0182OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Gasse P, Mary C, Guenon I, Noulin N, Charron S, Schnyder-Candrian S, et al. IL-1r1/MyD88 Signaling and the Inflammasome Are Essential in Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. J Clin Invest (2007) 117(12):3786–99. doi: 10.1172/JCI32285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Grailer JJ, Canning BA, Kalbitz M, Haggadone MD, Dhond RM, Andjelkovic AV, et al. Critical Role for the NLRP3 Inflammasome During Acute Lung Injury. J Immunol (2014) 192(12):5974–83. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Garaude J, Acín-Pérez R, Martínez-Cano S, Enamorado M, Ugolini M, Nistal-Villán E, et al. Mitochondrial Respiratory-Chain Adaptations in Macrophages Contribute to Antibacterial Host Defense. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(9):1037–45. doi: 10.1038/ni.3509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Heid ME, Keyel PA, Kamga C, Shiva S, Watkins SC, Salter RD. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Induces NLRP3-Dependent Lysosomal Damage and Inflammasome Activation. J Immunol (2013) 191(10):5230. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301490

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Weinberg SE, Sena LA, Chandel NS. Mitochondria in the Regulation of Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Immunity (2015) 42(3):406–17. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Plataki M, Cho SJ, Harris RM, Huang H-R, Yun HS, Schiffer KT, et al. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Aged Macrophages and Lung During Primary Streptococcus Pneumoniae Infection is Improved With Pirfenidone. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37438-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Invernizzi R, Molyneaux PL. The Contribution of Infection and The Respiratory Microbiome in Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev (2019) 28(152):190045. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0045-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Han MK, Zhou Y, Murray S, Tayob N, Noth I, Lama VN, et al. Lung Microbiome and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Analysis of the COMET Study. Lancet Respir Med (2014) 2(7):548–56. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70069-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Cho SJ, Hong KS, Jeong JH, Lee M, Choi AMK, Stout-Delgado HW, et al. Drosha-Dependent AIM2 Inflammasome Activation Contributes to Lung Inflammation During Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Cells (2019) 8(8):938. doi: 10.3390/cells8080938

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Terlizzi M, Molino A, Colarusso C, Donovan C, Imitazione P, Somma P, et al. Activation of the Absent in Melanoma 2 Inflammasome in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients Leads to the Release of Pro-Fibrotic Mediators. Front Immunol (2018) 9:670. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kolb M, Bondue B, Pesci A, Miyazaki Y, Song JW, Bhatt NY, et al. Acute Exacerbations of Progressive-Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Eur Respir Rev (2018) 27(150):180071. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0071-2018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Miyashita K, Kono M, Saito G, Koyanagi Y, Tsutsumi A, Kobayashi T, et al. Prognosis After Acute Exacerbation in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease Other Than Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Clin Respir J (2020) 15(3):336–44. doi: 10.1111/crj.13304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, et al. Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An International Working Group Report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2016) 194(3):265–75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0801CI

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Molyneaux PL, Cox MJ, Wells AU, Kim HC, Ji W, Cookson WOC, et al. Changes in the Respiratory Microbiome During Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir Res (2017) 18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0511-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Carleo A, Deluca D, Bargagli E, Wuyts W, Kaminski N, Prasse A. The Transciptome of BAL Cells At Acute Exacerbation of IPF Reveals New Insights. Eur Respir J (2019) 54(suppl 63):PA597. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.PA597

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction Between Microbiota and Immunity in Health and Disease. Cell Res (2020) 30(6):492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Schirmer M, Smeekens SP, Vlamakis H, Jaeger M, Oosting M, Franzosa EA, et al. Linking the Human Gut Microbiome to Inflammatory Cytokine Production Capacity. Cell (2016) 167(4):1125–36.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Mitroulis I, Skendros P, Ritis K. Targeting IL-1beta in Disease; the Expanding Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome. Eur J Internal Med (2010) 21(3):157–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Misharin AV, Morales-Nebreda L, Reyfman PA, Cuda CM, Walter JM, McQuattie-Pimentel AC, et al. Monocyte-Derived Alveolar Macrophages Drive Lung Fibrosis and Persist in the Lung Over the Life Span. J Exp Med (2017) 214(8):2387–404. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Garlanda C, Dinarello CA, Mantovani A. The Interleukin-1 Family: Back to the Future. Immunity (2013) 39(6):1003–18. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Choi J, Park J-E, Tsagkogeorga G, Yanagita M, Koo B-K, Han N, et al. Inflammatory Signals Induce AT2 Cell-Derived Damage-Associated Transient Progenitors That Mediate Alveolar Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell (2020) 27(3):366–82.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: IPF – idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, ILD, NLRP3, AIM2, NLRC4, mtROS, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, microbiome

Citation: Trachalaki A, Tsitoura E, Mastrodimou S, Invernizzi R, Vasarmidi E, Bibaki E, Tzanakis N, Molyneaux PL, Maher TM and Antoniou K (2021) Enhanced IL-1β Release Following NLRP3 and AIM2 Inflammasome Stimulation Is Linked to mtROS in Airway Macrophages in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 12:661811. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.661811

Received: 31 January 2021; Accepted: 21 May 2021;
Published: 15 June 2021.

Edited by:

Paul W. Bland, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Reviewed by:

Stefan W. Ryter, Harvard Medical School, United States
Gianluca Matteoli, KU Leuven, Belgium

Copyright © 2021 Trachalaki, Tsitoura, Mastrodimou, Invernizzi, Vasarmidi, Bibaki, Tzanakis, Molyneaux, Maher and Antoniou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Katerina Antoniou, a2FudG9uaW91QG1lZC51b2MuZ3I=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.