Prevotella histicola Protects From Arthritis by Expansion of Allobaculum and Augmenting Butyrate Production in Humanized Mice

Bacterial therapeutics are the emergent alternatives in treating autoimmune diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]. P. histicola MCI 001 is one such therapeutic bacterium that has been proven to treat autoimmune diseases such as RA and multiple sclerosis [MS] in animal models. The present study characterized P. histicola MCI 001 isolated from a human duodenal biopsy, and evaluated its impact on the gut microbial and metabolic profile in a longitudinal study using the collagen-induced arthritis model in HLA-DQ8.AEo transgenic mice. P. histicola MCI 001 though closely related to the type strain of P. histicola, DSM 19854, differed in utilizing glycerol. In culture, P. histicola MCI 001 produced vitamins such as biotin and folate, and was involved in digesting complex carbohydrates and production of acetate. Colonization study showed that duodenum was the predominant niche for the gavaged MCI 001. A longitudinal follow-up of gut microbial profile in arthritic mice treated with MCI 001 suggested that dysbiosis caused due to arthritis was partially restored to the profile of naïve mice after treatment. A taxon-level analysis suggested an expansion of intestinal genus Allobaculum in MCI001 treated arthritic mice. Eubiosis achieved post treatment with P. histicola MCI 001 was also reflected in the increased production of short-chain fatty acids [SCFAs]. Present study suggests that the treatment with P. histicola MCI 001 leads to an expansion of Allobaculum by increasing the availability of simple carbohydrates and acetate. Restoration of microbial profile and metabolites like butyrate induce immune and gut homeostasis.

Introduction

A diverse adaptive behavior of the genus Prevotella leads to high level of species and strain diversity. Characters of the strains are decided by the habitat in which they live and adapt; some strains of Prevotella are regarded as part of an oral community and cannot colonize the gut, while other Prevotella do colonize the gut (1–3). Oral bacteria traverse through various parts of the intestine along with food and saliva mixture. However, only a few bacteria survive and can colonize the gut. Prevotella is one of the most abundant bacterial populations in the oral and gut microbiome. Hence discovering and understanding the novel strains of the genus Prevotella is a key to discovering some of the uncharacterized aspects of the human microbiome.

There are four genera present in family Prevotellaceae with 54 recorded species, among those, 50 species belong to the genus Prevotella. There are two groups of Prevotella based on their biochemical characters. The first is the P. melaninogenica group that ferments lactose and does not produce indole; members of this group are regarded as commensal microbiota. The second is the P. intermedia group; members of this group produce indole and are dominant species in periodontal diseases (1, 4). P. histicola has received much attention for its various habitual adaptations and its biomedical importance. P. histicola was initially isolated from human oral mucosal tissue associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma by Hooper et al. (5) and then taxonomically classified by Downs et al. (6). Based on the site of isolation, P. histicola was initially considered to be an oral commensal bacterium.

Recently, a role of gut microbiome has gained increased attention due to its impact on immune system (7–10). The function and diversity of the microbial population in gut plays a vital role in many biological processes of the host; alterations in microbial composition lead to an imbalance in the host’s metabolic activity. Dysbiosis in the gut microbiome is associated with various autoimmune diseases (8, 11, 12). The newfound importance of the gut microbiota has raised the question of manipulating the gut microbial and metabolic composition for treating disease conditions (8, 13, 14). Modulation of gut microbiota can be achieved through a variety of ways, such as prebiotic diet, antimicrobial interventions, fecal microbiota transplantation, and probiotics (8, 15, 16). Among the gut modulation options, use of novel therapeutic bacteria increases the potential of treating diseases by targeted microbial restoration in the gut, whereas other options are mostly untargeted (8).

Generally probiotics have a broad spectrum of activities such as digestion of complex nutrients, enhancing the gut immune homeostasis by producing secondary metabolites such as SCFAs and reducing pathogenic bacteria (9, 17, 18). SCFAs are essential metabolites in the gut that regulates the immune system by directly interacting with immune cells present in the gut ecosystem (19). SCFAs such as butyrate can activate GPR43-expressing T regulatory cells in keeping gut immune homeostasis (19, 20). Hence SCFA producing gut microbial candidates are widely tested for their potential in using therapeutic probiotics (8, 9). The prevalent over-the-counter probiotics are nonspecific and improve gut health for a short period (8). Recent studies on bacterial therapeutic approaches with anaerobic gut bacteria have opened the door to novel non-vaccinal biotherapeutic agents (21–24). Hence it is necessary to find indigenous anaerobic bacterial candidates as biotherapeutic agents for treating autoimmune and metabolic disorders (12). The use of selective bacterial members has shown improved immune response with better outcomes in mouse models of various diseases (8, 12, 25, 26). The relationship between the presence of the genus Prevotella in the human gut and autoimmune diseases has been controversial with one species reported as pathogenic while another species was observed to be beneficial (11, 27–29).

Recently, we isolated a novel strain of P. histicola, (referred to as MCI001), from a human duodenal biopsy; it was the first report of its presence in the human gut (26). Using mouse models of RA and MS, we have shown that the strain MCI001 can regulate host’s immune system and prevent autoimmunity in mice (30, 31). Here we have characterized this novel strain taxonomically using phenotypic and phylogenetic classification. Furthermore, gut colonization characteristics of the strain were assessed for identifying it as a potential bacterial therapeutics using a humanized mouse model of arthritis. We also evaluated modulation of gut microbiota and metabolites by MCI001 and implications for its use in treating RA.

Materials and Methods

Characterization of P. histicola MCI001

Standard methods were followed for the physiological and biochemical tests (32, 33). Classification and identification of the strain was resolved based on Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria (34). Vitamin biosynthesis was analyzed using microbiological assay methods (35). For phenotypic characterization of MCI001, commercially available API kits were used [API 50 CH, API 20E, API ID 32 and API ZYM; bioMe´rieux, Germany]. In all experiments, type strain P. histicola DSM 19854 and P. melaninogenica ATCC 25845 were used as controls. Colony morphology was observed by culturing microbes on tryptic soy agar [TSA] and tryptic soy blood agar plates. For broth culture, tryptic soy broth [TSB] was used. The culture conditions were kept at 37°C for 24 – 96 hours, with pH of 7.2 ± 0.2. Susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was tested using commercially prepared antimicrobial discs [BD Life Sciences, USA]. For electron microscopy, bacteria cultured for 36 hrs. in TSB were collected through centrifugation followed by washing with PBS and suspended in Trump’s fixative for slide preparation. Transmission Electron Microscopy [TEM] was done using a Philips CEM 300 electron microscope at Electron Microscopy Facility at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Tolerance to Bile Salts and Low pH

The resistance of MCI001 to different concentrations of bile salts and low pH in culture condition was analyzed. For resistance to low pH, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) was adjusted to variable pH; 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.5. Similarly, PBS was prepared with different concentrations of bile salts [0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0(w/v)]. Prepared PBS solution was inoculated with 0.5 mL MCI001 (10⁹ CFU ml^-1) cultured for over 36 hours, and incubated for 3 hrs. in anaerobic condition as mentioned above. Cultures were then subjected to serial dilutions followed by plating on blood agar plates and incubating for 48 – 72 hrs. to enumerate the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) for the survival rate of MCI001 in treated condition. Triplicates were maintained for each experiment.

Tolerance to Gastric Juice

To evaluate the tolerance of MCI001 in gastric juice, a simulated gastric juice was used (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Modified TSB was used in the preparation of simulated gastric juice, where the pH was adjusted to pH 2 using hydrochloride (HCl). Sterile TSB was supplemented with 0.25% bile salt, pepsin (15 µg ml^-1) and Lysozyme (100 µg ml^-1). Prepared gastric juice was inoculated with 0.5 mL of MCI001 culture (10⁹ CFU ml^-1) (cultured for 36 hrs.) and incubated for 3 hrs. in anaerobic condition and CFU analysis was carried out using serial dilution method.

16SrRNA Gene Sequencing and Phylogeny

For 16S rRNA gene sequencing, genomic DNA of the pure culture of MCI001 was isolated [PowerDNA isolation, QIAGEN, USA] and subjected to PCR amplification using a universal 16S rDNA primer set (Table 1). PCR amplification was carried out using KAPA HiFi Hotstart PCR ready mix [KAPA Biosciences, USA]. After amplification, the product was sequenced [Sangers sequencing] using the same primers by the Genomics facility at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. BioEdit program was used to assemble the sequences (39). The closest relatives of the strain were identified using BLAST analysis. Selected sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W program, and the phylogenetic relationship was analyzed, and the tree was constructed using MEGA7 program with neighbor-joining method (40).

TABLE 1

Table 1 Primers used in this study.

Induction of Collagen-Induced Arthritis and Treatment with P. histicola MCI001

Transgenic mice lacking major histocompatibility complex class II [MHC II] genes [AEo] and expressing the human HLA-DQB1*0302/DQA1*0301 gene [DQ8.AEo] on the B6/129 background were generated as described previously (41). Mice aged 8-12 weeks used in the study were bred and maintained in a pathogen-free colony by the Department of Comparative Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. All animal experiments used in the study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee [IACUC protocol # A00002667-17].

To determine the effect of MCI001 treatment over a period, longitudinal study was conducted using DQ8 mice [n=15] which helped in avoiding cage effects as confounding factors. Induction and evaluation of collagen-induced arthritis [CIA] were carried out by immunization with type II collagen [CII] and follow-up of arthritis progression as described previously (26). Fecal samples were collected prior to the induction of arthritis and then at varying times. Mice were divided into 3 groups, Gp.1- Naïve control [n=5], un-manipulated, without any treatments and immunizations, Gp.2- disease control [n=5], CII-immunized and no bacterial treatment and Gp.3- mice immunized with CII and subjected to bacterial treatment. Mice were immunized with collagen [n=5] and treated with MCI001 [100µL of 10⁹ CFU ml^-1] one week after immunization on alternate days for 5 weeks. Fecal samples were collected at various time points for each mouse separately and stored in -80°C [day 0, one week post-immunization, after 2 weeks of bacterial treatment and at the end of the experiment]. Mice were sacrificed 6 weeks post-immunization and various gut sections duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon were collected for microbiome analysis (26). Intestinal sections were gently washed with PBS to remove debris and the mucus layer was scrapped out. For cecum, whole cecal content along with mucus layer was used. From each intestinal section, 100 mg of the collected sample was used for DNA isolation procedure.

16S Sequencing for Microbiome Analysis

DNA isolation from gut sections and fecal samples was carried out using QIAamp PowerFecal DNA Isolation Kit [QIAGEN, USA]. To prepare libraries, a polymerase chain reaction [PCR] was performed using a universal forward primer targeting 357F [5′AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTATGGTAATTGTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG3′] and barcoded reverse primer targeting 926R [5′CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATNNNNNNNNNNNNAGTCAGTCAGCCCCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGT3′] (42) using Kapa HiFi Hotstart Ready PCR Mix [Kapa Biosystems]. The amplified product was checked for quality by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the PCR product was subjected to purification using Agencourt AMPure XP beads [Beckman Coulter, USA] and quantified using NanoDrop [Thermo Scientific, USA]. An equal amount of DNA from each amplified sample was pooled for library preparation, concentrated by vacuum drying method using SpeedVac concentrator [SAVANT] and then resuspended in nuclease-free molecular biology grade sterile water [Sigma Aldrich, USA]. Final purification of the library was carried out using AMPure XP beads and final DNA concentration calculated using Qubit fluorimeter [Invitrogen, USA]. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was done at the Mayo Genomics Facility using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 [500 cycles; Illumina Inc.], generating 20 M 2x250 reads. Sequence reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units [OTUs] by the bioinformatics pipeline hybrid-denovo [default parameter setting], which was built upon the IM-TORNADO pipeline to handle a mixture of good quality paired-end and single-end reads (11, 42, 43). The outputs of the pipeline [OTU abundance, phylognetic tree and OTU taxonomic assignments] were subjected to downstream community analysis.

Microbial Community Analysis

A total of 7,746,101 reads with the taxonomic assignment averaging 127,663 ± 41396 reads per sample were obtained. The alpha and beta microbial diversity was analyzed with the R-packages phyloseq [v1.22.3] (44), microbiomeseq [https://github.com/umerijaz/microbiomeSeq] and microbiome[v1.0.2] [https://github.com/microbiome/microbiome]. Alpha diversity measures of three groups were compared using ANOVA. Bray-Curtis distance analysis was used for analysis of similarities [ANOSIM, package v 2.4-4] to test for similarities in microbial communities and generation of principal coordinate analysis [PCoA] plots (45). Differential abundance analysis of taxa in fecal samples between sample groups was performed by Wilcoxon rank sum test [Mann-Whitney test]. Due to a small sample size, multiple testing corrections were not performed. Taxa with nominal p-values less than 0.05 were subject to further follow-up. All analysis was done using R packages and data was visualized using ggplot2 [v 2.2.1] in R (46).

Quantitative PCR

To assess the colonization character of MCI001 in gut, DNA isolated from the gut samples were subjected to qPCR quantification as described previously (4). Total bacterial population was quantified using universal qPCR 16S rRNA gene primer set. For total Prevotella and P. histicola quantifications, published specific primers were used (4). List of primers used in this study is given in Table 1.

SCFAs

SCFAs in the fecal samples were quantified by liquid chromatography Mass spectrophotometer [LC-MS] by the Mayo Core facility. The obtained results were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and plots generated using IBM SPSS statistics version 22.0.

Results

Description of P. histicola MCI001

MCI001 is an obligate anaerobe, non-motile and Gram-negative bacillus with the size of ~0.2-2.0 um in diameter. Colonies are ~1 -2 mm in diameter, entire convex circular, creamy and opaque on TSA. The β-hemolytic bacterium produces bull’s eye colonies with red to black pigmentation in the center of the colony after 2 to 4 days of incubation on blood agar plates. There is a moderate to high turbid growth in TSB after 24 to 48 hrs. of incubation, subsequently cells settle at the bottom of the tube suggesting a stationary phase of growth in 48 hrs. It is a saccharolytic strain and ferments fructose, galactose, glucose, glycogen, Inulin, lactose, maltose, mannose, raffinose, saccharose, sucrose, and turanose (Table S1). It does not ferment arabinose, arabinose, cellobiose, dulcitol, fucose, gentiobiose, inositol, lyxose, mannitol, melezitose, melibiose, rhamnose, ribose, salicin, sorbitol, sorbose, tagatose, trehalose, xylitol, and xylose. MCI001 produces acetic acid as the primary metabolic end product as well as succinic acid along with trace amount of isovaleric acid and lactic acid. MCI001 hydrolyzed gelatin but not aesculin, arginine, and urea and did not produce catalase, indole and nitrate reductase. The Rapid ID 32A profile is 4707 4502 22.

The phylogenic analysis showed the MCI001 to be closest to type strain of P. histicola followed by, P. jejuni, P. melaninogenica and P. veroralis (Figure 1A). TEM structures from the ultra-thin sections of MCI001 showed similarities to the reported Prevotella members (47, 48) (Figure 1B). MCI001 TEM structure was a match with the tested type strain of P. histicola [DSM 19845]. Fundamental structures observed in TEM include space between the cell wall and cell membrane which holds gas vesicles and thread-like structures is coming out from the cell that carry loosely attached gas vesicles. TEM also showed fimbria structures all over the cell surface. Critical phenotypic characters of MCI001 that differ from the phylogenetically closest bacteria are listed in Table 2. All other phenotypic results are given in supplementary information (Table S1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 (A) Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of P. histicola MCI001 constructed with closest relatives. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed. (B) Transmission electron microscope structures of P. histicola MCI 001 compared type strain of P. histicola DSM 19854. (C) Production of acetate in in-vitro cultures of P. histicola MCI 001 and the type strain of P. histicola DSM 19854 with or without glycerol in the culture medium.

TABLE 2

Table 2 Critical phenotypic characters of MCI001, distinguishes from closest relatives.

MCI001 produces vitamins such as folate and biotin. This strain also metabolizes glycerol to produce high amounts of acetic acid, (Figure 1C). On the other hand, type strain DSM 19845 did not utilize glycerol and did not show increased acetate production (Figure 1C). MCI001 exhibits tolerance to bile salts [up to 0.5%], lower pH [pH 2] and gastric juice [up to 90 min], which are characteristics of a gut commensal colonizing small intestine (49).

P. histicola MCI001 Treatment Partially Normalizes Gut Microbiota in DQ8 Mice

A longitudinal follow up for six weeks of fecal microbiota from naïve DQ8 mice showed a gradual decrease in alpha diversity using Simpson index (Figure 2A). An increase in genera Allobaculum and Sutterella with a decrease in Coprococcus and Ruminococcus in naïve mice represent the healthy gut microbiome of DQ8 mice. As compared to naïve state, CII-immunization led to a microbial shift as indicated by apparent separation in alpha and beta diversities suggesting potential dysbiosis (Figure 2). Immunized mice showed a shift in beta diversity one week after CII-immunization. On the other hand, in CII-immunized mice treated with MCI001, the microbial profile was restored with similarities to naïve mice within 2 weeks of treatment suggesting that the dysbiosis caused by CII-immunization can be reversed by MCI001 treatment (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Treatment with MCI001 partially restores gut microbiota to naïve state. (A) A longitudinal analysis of alpha diversity (Simpson index) in fecal samples compared between various groups and time points. (B) Bray Curtis dissimilarity distance analysis illustrating the beta diversity of the fecal samples in various groups as indicated. N=5 for each group and time; statistical significance given as *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01.

Relative abundance analysis revealed that the dysbiosis due to CII-immunization was represented by an increase in Prevotella genus and a decrease in genus Allobaculum. DQ8 mice treated with MCI001, showed a reversal within 2 weeks of treatment with an increase in Allobaculum and a decrease in Ruminococcus, which resembles that of naïve mice. Interestingly, P. histicola treatment led to a decrease in the species belonging to genus Prevotella in fecal samples; this reduction was not observed in non-treated CIA mice (Figures 3, 4A). Overall the observations depict a partial normalization of gut microbiota after treatment of CII-immunized DQ8 mice with MCI001. The genus Allobaculum presented the strongest correlation to healthy state as naïve and MCI001 treated mice showed similar abundance in comparison to arthritic mice (Figure 3). Variations in the relative abundances of significant genera at various time points in all the groups are illustrated in supplementary information (Figures S1–S3). Dysbiosis was also evident in phylum and family levels of relative abundance analysis (Figure S4). At the phylum level, MCI001 treated mice showed an increase in Firmicutes, predominantly represented by family Erycepelotrichaceae and the genus Allobaculum, after 6 weeks. Thus variation in the genus Allobaculum was directly proportional to the abundance of family Erycepelotrichaceae.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 A comparison of the relative abundance of the most significant bacteria [Allobaculum, Prevotella, and Ruminococcus] at various time points. N=5 for each group and time; statistical significance at *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Relative abundance of microbial composition. (A) A comparison of the relative abundance of various genera and unclassified genus among naïve, arthritic non-treated [CIA control] and CII-immunized mice treated with MCI001 [CIA-treated] groups as various time points. N=5 for each group and time. (B) Relative abundance of microbial diversity of gut sections compared between arthritic non-treated and MCI001 treated mice. Y-axis represents the proportion of microbial composition.

The present study is in confirmation with our previous observations exhibiting a protective impact of MCI001 treatment on arthritis (26). DQ8 mice treated with MCI001 did not show disease onset till 4 weeks post-immunization while the non-treated CII-immunized group developed arthritis after 2 weeks of immunization with all mice becoming arthritic by week 6 (Figure S5). In MCI001 treated group, delay in disease onset at week 3 correlated with a shift in fecal microbiome, where the restoration of eubiosis helped in delaying disease onset and reduced incidence. Treated mice showed 50% incidence by week 6 as compared to 100% arthritis in non-treated mice.

P. histicola MCI001 Colonizes Duodenum and Enhances Allobaculum Abundance

As MCI001 was isolated from a duodenal biopsy, we determined the site of colonization in DQ8 mice. Microbial composition of various gut sections was compared between non-treated arthritic and MCI001 treated DQ8 mice. MCI001 largely colonized in the duodenum of the small intestine and did not colonize the jejunum, ileum and cecum but showed some presence in the colon (Figure 4B). In duodenum and ileum, phyla Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were decreased in the MCI001 treatment group when compared to non-treated mice. However, the cecum showed an increase in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes with a decrease in the abundance of Proteobacteria after MCI001 treatment (Figure S6). MCI001 treatment led to an expansion of Allobaculum in all gut sections of the treated group (Figure 5). Genus Helicobacter and Lactobacillus were decreased in the small intestine and cecum, while colon showed a decrease in Desulfovibrio and Prevotella genera in the treated group. As fecal samples mainly represent the colon microbiota, microbial diversity variations from the small intestine and cecum are not closely reflected in fecal samples. Our data suggest that analyzing both fecal and gut sections’ microbiota will help in interpreting gut modulatory effects precisely.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5 P. histicola colonizes the duodenum and expands Allobaculum. Relative abundance of significant bacteria compared between CIA control and MCI001 treated mice. N=3-4 for each group and time; statistical significance given as *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 and ***P ≤ 0.001.

To further define the niche for MCI001 colonization, qPCR analysis of gut sections was carried out (Figure 6). In qPCR analysis, P. histicola species was only observed in duodenum, colon and fecal samples of MCI001 treated mice while it was not detected in gut sections of non-treated and naïve mice. Interestingly, even though P. histicola colonized the upper and lower intestine, its colonization reduced the abundance of overall genus Prevotella in the ileum, colon, and feces. Jejunum showed lower bacterial population compared to other gut sections.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6 qPCR quantification of P. histicola, total Prevotella, and total bacterial load in gut sections. N=5 for each group and time; statistical significance given as *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 and ***P ≤ 0.001.

P. histicola MCI001 Treatment Restores SCFA Levels

Fecal SCFA comparison between arthritic non-treated and MCI001 treated mice at various time points longitudinally from day 0 to week 6 showed a decrease in SCFA production in arthritic group after one week (Figure 7). A decrease in total SCFAs correlated with dysbiosis of the gut microbiome (Figure 2). However, after treatment with MCI001, SCFA levels showed an increased correlation with the restoration of eubiosis. A similar trend was observed with acetic acid, butyric acid, and propionic acid. Overall acetic acid production dominated followed by butyric acid and propionic acid. These changes can be directly correlated to MCI001 and the abundance of genus Allobaculum (Figures 3, 7). Other SCFAs levels were low in concentration, below 4 µmol g-1 levels, and also did not show significant differences between selected time points.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7 Treatment with P. histicola MCI 001 augments SCFA production. Quantification of SCFA from fecal samples, compared between arthritic (CIA control) and MCI001 treated group. N=5 for each group and time; statistical significance given as *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 and ***P ≤ 0.001.

Discussion

Our previous study showed that MCI001 protects DQ8 mice from arthritis by generation of T regulatory cells in the periphery as well as synovium and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines (26, 50). In the present study, we have shown that the P. histicola isolate MCI001 colonizes the same niche as in humans and delays the onset of CIA in DQ8 mice by modulating gut microbiome and SCFAs. Most studies focus on fecal microbiota which mostly represents the colon microbiome. However, fecal microbiome may not completely represent other parts of the gut, especially small intestine. Small intestine has low pH resulting in low abundance of commensals. Since small intestine has thinner mucus layer compared to the colon, it is much more sensitive to microbial interactions than large intestine and requires specific microbial populations for the maintenance of immune homeostasis (51–53). The changes in small intestinal physiology and microbiome can directly affect the colon microbiome. The MCI001 was isolated from the duodenum biopsy of a human and hence we posited that it might find the same niche in mice for colonization. The data presented here show that MCI001 explicitly colonizes duodenum of the treated DQ8 mice. Besides duodenum, MCI001 also colonized the colon and cecum, though it was not as dominant as in the duodenum. P. histicola dominated in the total bacterial composition of the duodenum even though genus Prevotella was decreased in the treated group suggesting P. histicola may compete with other species of Prevotella which may be pathogenic. Although the numbers of mice studied are small in numbers, this was supported by an increase in Prevotella in arthritic non-treated group indicating that native Prevotella, not belonging to P. histicola, in DQ8 mice may contribute to disease. One can envisage that the competitive reduction of other Prevotella members by MCI001 helps in reducing the disease severity. Indeed, our previous studies support this notion (26). However, another Prevotella species, P. copri has been implicated in RA pathogenesis (27, 54, 55). Taxonomically, one group of Prevotella [P. melaninogenica group] is commensal bacteria and another group of Prevotella [P. intermedia group] has been reported to have pathogenic characters (1). P. histicola belongs to P. melaninogenica group, phylogenetic and phenotypic analysis of the present study also support this statement (1).

The observations from this study indicate that MCI001 interactions restore gut microbial composition to that of naïve state and protect by interactions with other gut bacteria especially with the members of Firmicutes predominantly with genus Allobaculum which was increased in all parts of the gut except Jejunum. The data in the present study implicates a significant role of Allobaculum. While other genera showed variability and different trends at various time points, Allobaculum was increased in all gut sections in MCI001 treated group. A significant reduction in Allobaculum abundance after CII immunization suggests an evidence of dysbiosis as an expansion of Allobaculum in mice correlated with a delay in disease onset and lower disease severity and restoration of eubiosis in the treated group. In addition, changes in SCFAs levels were directly proportional to the alterations in Allobaculum abundance. These data point to Allobaculum as a key bacterium in the treated group and suggests that one of the mechanism by which MCI001 treatment protects from arthritis may be by influencing the growth of genus Allobaculum. However, we cannot rule out the role of other microbes in generating eubiosis.

Interaction between MCI001 and Allobaculum may be responsible for metabolic and consequently immune changes in the small intestine of the treated mice which drive the anti-inflammatory response. The observations in this study are reminiscent of the previous data in NOD mice where treatment of obese mice with high fiber diet led to weight loss which was associated with the colonization of Prevotella and Allobaculum (56, 57). Allobaculum is one of the high butyrate producing Firmicute and is an active glucose assimilator in the gut (58–60). The present study also affirmed that the increase in Allobaculum correlated with an increase in SCFA production, especially butyrate. Allobaculum is a mouse commensal and has properties similar to Faecalibacterium, the most abundant commensal in the healthy human gut (61). Both Faecalibacterium and Allobaculum are Firmicutes that are butyrate producers and share metabolic similarities in the gut. Both of these bacteria can coexist and dominate in the guts of mice treated for metabolic disorders (57).

One can speculate that an essential metabolite produced by P. histicola leads to the expansion of Allobaculum in the host’s gut augmenting butyrate production as shown in MCI001 treated mice which leads to generation of T regulatory cells as shown previously (Figure S7) (26). Butyrate is widely reported SCFA for its interaction with the gut immune system in maintaining immune homeostasis (19, 20, 62, 63) and is a significant energy source for many commensal bacteria in the gut (63). Duodenum colonized P. histicola may be involved in the breakdown of undigested complex carbohydrates and oligosaccharides from the stomach, a common characteristic of a commensal present in the small intestine (64), and thus may aid in carbohydrate digestion leading to an increase in glucose and other simple carbohydrates. Biochemical analysis supports that MCI001 produces a wide variety of enzymes that are involved in the degradation of complex carbohydrates. An increase in glucose levels could support the growth of native Allobaculum which produces butyrate, thereby increasing the growth of natural commensals to restore commensal bacterial composition. As Allobaculum is an extraordinary glucose assimilator, it may decrease the availability of glucose to CD4 T cells for proliferation and cytokine production in RA (65). Our previous study supports this observation as treatment with MCI001 downregulated Th17 and increased T regulatory cells (8, 26).

Based on the above observations, we explored if MCI001 is a bio-therapeutic agent. Biochemical characters of the strain MCI001 prove its versatility in growing at various pH and metabolic conditions supported by colonization in duodenum in treated mice. Besides the colonization characteristics, MCI001 can support the health of the host by other functions such as glycerol metabolism, producing vitamins and SCFA, degrading mucin and interacting with other commensal bacteria. Glycerol utilizing character of MCI001 increases its acetate productivity which may be utilized by beneficial Firmicutes commensals such as Faecalibacterium and Allobaculum. Acetate is the major SCFA [over 50%] and represents a healthy gut (17, 60, 66). Furthermore, excess acetate can be converted to butyrate by the microbial enzymes in the gut (17, 60). Thus glycerol metabolism and acetate production characters of MCI001 represent beneficial actions in maintaining gut homeostasis.

Biotin and Folate production by MCI001 increases its feasibility of therapeutic applications. While many bacteria in the colon can produce vitamins, its absorption is very low in the colon. Most of the essential vitamins are absorbed in the proximal small intestine (67–69),. Also, Folate is an essential vitamin B required for many metabolic reactions such as nucleic acid synthesis, amino acid synthesis and protecting the genome from free radicals (70, 71). Patients with RA being treated with Methotrexate [MTX] are given folate supplements to avoid folate deficiency and MTX-dependent reduction in the production of dihydrofolate reductase and other folate-dependent enzymes (72, 73). As the microbial production of folate is controlled by environmental needs; it is considered to be a critical character for a probiotic bacteria (68). Taking into consideration the efficiency of MCI001 in colonizing duodenum; MCI001 can be used as a vital alternative in replacing chemical folate supplementation in RA patients on MTX treatment. In in-vitro studies, MCI001 did not show any degradation activity for MTX and MTX did not show any antimicrobial properties on MCI001 [Data not shown].

A human gut-derived anaerobic commensal for the therapeutic purpose is a novel concept. Though upper gut has lower microbial load and diversity, it is immunologically active and can have a significant impact on the immune function. Based on the discussed characters of MCI001 and its ability to modulate immune system and treat autoimmune diseases in mouse models, P. histicola MCI001, a microbe in the upper gut, could be as a promising bio-therapeutic agent for humans.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that treatment with P. histicola MCI001 partially normalizes the microbiota of arthritic gut to naïve state in DQ8 mice. A similar restoration has been demonstrated in RA patients treated with Methotrexate (11, 74). Microbial restoration after treatment with P. histicola also enhanced the production of SCFAs. The P. histicola isolate reported here colonized the duodenum, a site from where it was isolated from human biopsy, suggesting that the immune response modulation via the upper gut may be a viable therapeutic option for RA.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: NCBI BioProject accession PRJNA691623 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA691623).

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by IACUC, Mayo Clinic.

Author Contributions

VT, JM and BB designed the concept. BB and VT designed the research experiments. BB, EM, and DL carried out most of the experimental work. BB, RB, JC, PJ, and VT analyzed the data. BB and VT wrote the manuscript with the input of co-authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The work was supported by funds from the Department of Defense grants W81XWH-10-1-0257 and W81XWH-15-1-0213 to VT.

Conflict of Interest

Authors VT, JM and EM associated with this project and Mayo Clinic has a Financial Conflict of Interest in Prevotella histicola used in the research and that the investigator(s) and Mayo Clinic may stand to gain financially from the successful outcome of the research.

Acknowledgments

RB was supported by the Fulbright Fellowship. VT, JM, and EM invented the technology used in this manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.609644/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Alauze C, Marchandin H, Lozniewski A. New Insights Into Prevotella Diversity and Medical Microbiology. Future Microbiol (2010) 5(11):1695–718. doi: 10.2217/Fmb.10.126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ley RE. Prevotella in the Gut: Choose Carefully. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 13(2):69–U23. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gorvitovskaia A, Holmes SP, Huse SM. Interpreting Prevotella and Bacteroides as Biomarkers of Diet and Lifestyle. Microbiome (2016) 4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0160-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Balakrishnan B, Luckey D, Marietta E, Karau M, Patel R, Murray J, et al. Development of a Real-Time PCR Method for Quantification of Prevotella Histicola From the Gut. Anaerobe (2017) 48:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hooper SJ, Crea SJ, Lewis MAO, Spratt DA, Wade WG, Wilson MJ. Viable Bacteria Present Within Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tissue. J Clin Microbiol (2006) 44(5):1719–25. doi: 10.1128/Jcm.44.5.1719-1725.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Downes J, Hooper SJ, Wilson MJ, Wade WG. Prevotella Histicola Sp Nov., Isolated From the Human Oral Cavity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (2008) 58:1788–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65656-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wu HJ, Wu E. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Immune Homeostasis and Autoimmunity. Gut Microbes (2012) 3(1):4–14. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Balakrishnan B, Taneja V. Microbial Modulation of the Gut Microbiome for Treating Autoimmune Diseases. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2018) 12(10):985–96. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1517044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Marietta E HI, Balakrishnan B, Taneja V. Role of the Intestinal Microbiome in Autoimmune Diseases and its Use in Treatments. Cell Immunol (2018) 339:50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Balakrishnan B, Luckey D, Taneja V. Autoimmunity-Associated Gut Commensals Modulate Gut Permeability and Immunity in Humanized Mice. Mil Med (2019) 184(Suppl 1):529–36. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen J, Wright K, Davis JM, Jeraldo P, Marietta EV, Murray J, et al. An Expansion of Rare Lineage Intestinal Microbes Characterizes Rheumatoid Arthritis. Genome Med (2016) 8(43):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0299-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. de Oliveira GLV, Leite AZ, Higuchi BS, Gonzaga MI, Mariano VS. Intestinal Dysbiosis and Probiotic Applications in Autoimmune Diseases. Immunology (2017) 152(1):1–12. doi: 10.1111/imm.12765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang BH, Yao MF, Lv LX, Ling ZX, Li LJ. The Human Microbiota in Health and Disease. Engineering (2017) 3(1):71–82. doi: 10.1016/J.Eng.2017.01.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schmidt TSB, Raes J, Bork P. The Human Gut Microbiome: From Association to Modulation. Cell (2018) 172(6):1198–215. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Walsh CJ, Guinane CM, O’Toole PW, Cotter PD. Beneficial Modulation of the Gut Microbiota. FEBS Lett (2014) 588(22):4120–30. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.03.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McCarville JL, Caminero A, Verdu EF. Novel Perspectives on Therapeutic Modulation of the Gut Microbiota. Therap Adv Gastroenterol (2016) 9(4):580–93. doi: 10.1177/1756283X16637819

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Rios-Covian D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Salazar N. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and Their Link With Diet and Human Health. Front Microbiol (2016) 7(185):1–9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Brodmann T, Endo A, Gueimonde M, Vinderola G, Kneifel W, de Vos WM, et al. Safety of Novel Microbes for Human Consumption: Practical Examples of Assessment in the European Union. Front Microbiol (2017) 8:1725. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tan J, McKenzie C, Vuillermin PJ, Goverse G, Vinuesa CG, Mebius RE, et al. Dietary Fiber and Bacterial SCFA Enhance Oral Tolerance and Protect Against Food Allergy Through Diverse Cellular Pathways. Cell Rep (2016) 15(12):2809–24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, et al. The Microbial Metabolites, Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Regulate Colonic Treg Cell Homeostasis. Science (2013) 341(6145):569–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Maier E, Anderson RC, Roy NC. Understanding How Commensal Obligate Anaerobic Bacteria Regulate Immune Functions in the Large Intestine. Nutrients (2015) 7(1):45–73. doi: 10.3390/nu7010045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. El Enshasy H, Malik K, Abd Malek R, Othman NZ, Elsayed EA, Wadaan M. Anaerobic Probiotics: The Key Microbes for Human Health. Anaerobes Biotechnol (2016) 156:397–431. doi: 10.1007/10_2015_5008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cani PD, de Vos WM. Next-Generation Beneficial Microbes: The Case of Akkermansia Muciniphila. Front Microbiol (2017) 8(1765):1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Naito Y, Uchiyama K, Takagi T. A Next-Generation Beneficial Microbe: Akkermansia Muciniphila. J Clin Biochem Nutr (2018) 63(1):33–5. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.18-57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Al-Salami H CR, Golocorbin-Kon S, Mikov M. Probiotics Applications in Autoimmune Diseases. In: Rigobelo EC, (Eds.), Probiotics. Rijeka: InTech (2012). doi: 10.5772/50463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Marietta EV, Murray JA, Luckey DH, Jeraldo PR, Lamba A, Patel R, et al. Suppression of Inflammatory Arthritis by Human Gut-Derived Prevotella Histicola in Humanized Mice. Arthritis Rheumatol (2016) 68(12):2878–88. doi: 10.1002/art.39785

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, Segata N, Ubeda C, Bielski C, et al. Expansion of Intestinal Prevotella Copri Correlates With Enhanced Susceptibility to Arthritis. Elife (2013) 2:e01202. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Miyake S, Kim S, Suda W, Oshima K, Nakamura M, Matsuoka T, et al. Dysbiosis in the Gut Microbiota of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, With a Striking Depletion of Species Belonging to Clostridia XIVa and IV Clusters. PloS One (2015) 10(9):e0137429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chen J, Chia N, Kalari KR, Yao JZ, Novotna M, Soldan MMP, et al. Multiple Sclerosis Patients Have a Distinct Gut Microbiota Compared to Healthy Controls. Sci Rep (2016) 6:28484. doi: 10.1038/srep28484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mangalam A, Shahi SK, Luckey D, Karau M, Marietta E, Luo N, et al. Human Gut-Derived Commensal Bacteria Suppress CNS Inflammatory and Demyelinating Disease. Cell Rep (2017) 8(6):1269–77. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shahi SK, Freedman SN, Murra AC, Zarei K, Sompallae R, Gibson-Corley KN, et al. Prevotella histicola, A Human Gut Commensal, Is as Potent as COPAXONE(R) in an Animal Model of Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol (2019) 10:462. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Holdeman L, Cato EP, Moore WEC. Anaerobe Laboratory Manual. Blacksburg, Virginia: Anaerobe Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (1977).

Google Scholar

33. Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P, Citron D, Baron EJ, Wexler HM, Finegold SM. Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual. Belmont, CA: Star Publishing (2002).

Google Scholar

34. Krieg N, Ludwig W, Euzéby J, Whitman WB. Phylum XIV. Bacteroidetes Phyl. Nov. New York: Springer-Verlag (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68572-4_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ball GFM. Microbiological Methods for the Determination of the B-group Vitamins. In: Water-Soluble Vitamin Assays in Human Nutrition. Boston, MA: Springer US (1994). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2061-0_7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16s Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. J Bacteriol (1991) 173(2):697–703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Manichanh C, Reeder J, Gibert P, Varela E, Llopis M, Antolin M, et al. Reshaping the Gut Microbiome With Bacterial Transplantation and Antibiotic Intake. Genome Res (2010) 20(10):1411–9. doi: 10.1101/gr.107987.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Miyamoto Y, Takada T, Matsumoto K, et al. Development of 16S rRNA-gene-targeted Group-Specific Primers for the Detection and Identification of Predominant Bacteria in Human Feces. Appl Environ Microbiol (2002) 68(11):5445–51. doi: 10.1128/Aem.68.11.5445-5451.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hall T. BioEdit: An Important Software for Molecular Biology. GERF Bull Biosci (2011) 2(1):60–1.

Google Scholar

40. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol (2016) 33(7):1870–4. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Taneja V, Behrens M, Mangalam A, Griffiths MM, Luthra HS, David CS. New Humanized HLA-DR4-transgenic Mice That Mimic the Sex Bias of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 56(1):69–78. doi: 10.1002/art.22213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jeraldo P, Kalari K, Chen XF, Bhavsar J, Mangalam A, White B, et al. IM-TORNADO: A Tool for Comparison of 16S Reads From Paired-End Libraries. PloS One (2014) 9(12):e114804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chen X, Johnson S, Jeraldo P, Wang J, Chia N, Kocher JA, et al. Hybrid-Denovo: A De Novo OTU-picking Pipeline Integrating Single-End and Paired-End 16S Sequence Tags. Gigascience (2018) 7(3):1–7. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix129

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PloS One (2013) e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Dixon P. VEGAN, a Package of R Functions for Community Ecology. J Veg Sci (2003) 14(6):927–30. doi: 10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0927:Vaporf]2.0.Co;2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, New York: Springer-Verlag (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Hedberg ME, Israelsson A, Moore ER, Svensson-Stadler L, Wai SN, Pietz G, et al. Prevotella Jejuni Sp. Nov., Isolated From the Small Intestine of a Child With Coeliac Disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (2013) 63(Pt 11):4218–23. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052647-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Buhl M, Willmann M, Liese J, Autenrieth IB, Marschal M. Prevotella Colorans Sp. Nov., Isolated From a Human Wound. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (2016) 66(8):3005–9. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut Biogeography of the Bacterial Microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol (2016) 14(1):20–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Balakrishnan B, Luckey D, Bodkhe R, Taneja V. Prevotella Histicola Treatment Reduces Arthritic Pain and Partially Normalizes Gut Microbiota and Metabolites. J Immunol (2020) 204(1 Supplement):141.17.

Google Scholar

51. Santaolalla R, Abreu MT. Innate Immunity in the Small Intestine. Curr Opin Gastroenterol (2012) 28(2):124–9. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283506559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Brown EM, Sadarangani M, Finlay BB. The Role of the Immune System in Governing Host-Microbe Interactions in the Intestine. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(7):660–7. doi: 10.1038/ni.2611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Sommer F, Backhed F. The Gut Microbiota - Masters of Host Development and Physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol (2013) 11(4):227–38. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Moreno J. Prevotella Copri and the Microbial Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Reumatol Clin (2015) 11(2):61–3. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2014.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Maeda Y, Takeda K. Role of Gut Microbiota in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Med (2017) 6(6):60. doi: 10.3390/jcm6060060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Everard A, Lazarevic V, Gaia N, Johansson M, Stahlman M, Backhed F, et al. Microbiome of Prebiotic-Treated Mice Reveals Novel Targets Involved in Host Response During Obesity. ISME J (2014) 8(10):2116–30. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Huazano-Garcia A, Shin H, Lopez MG. Modulation of Gut Microbiota of Overweight Mice by Agavins and Their Association With Body Weight Loss. Nutrients (2017) 9(9):821. doi: 10.3390/nu9090821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Tachon S, Zhou JN, Keenan M, Martin R, Marco ML. The Intestinal Microbiota in Aged Mice is Modulated by Dietary Resistant Starch and Correlated With Improvements in Host Responses. FEMS Microbiol Ecol (2013) 83(2):299–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01475.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Greetham HL, Gibson GR, Giffard C, Hippe H, Merkhoffer B, Steiner U, et al. Allobaculum Stercoricanis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated From Canine Feces. Anaerobe (2004) 10(5):301–7. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Herrmann E, Young W, Rosendale D, Reichert-Grimm V, Riedel CU, Conrad R, et al. RNA-Based Stable Isotope Probing Suggests Allobaculum Spp. As Particularly Active Glucose Assimilators in a Complex Murine Microbiota Cultured In Vitro. BioMed Res Int (2017) 1829685:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2017/1829685

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Nguyen TLA, Vieira-Silva S, Liston A, Raes J. How Informative is the Mouse for Human Gut Microbiota Research? Dis Models Mech (2015) 8(1):1–16. doi: 10.1242/dmm.017400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Chang PV, Hao L, Offermanns S, Medzhitov R. The Microbial Metabolite Butyrate Regulates Intestinal Macrophage Function Via Histone Deacetylase Inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2014) 111(6):2247–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322269111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Bourassa MW, Alim I, Bultman SJ, Ratan RR. Butyrate, Neuroepigenetics and the Gut Microbiome: Can a High Fiber Diet Improve Brain Health? Neurosci Lett (2016) 625:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zoetendal EG, Raes J, van den Bogert B, Arumugam M, Booijink CCGM, Troost FJ, et al. The Human Small Intestinal Microbiota is Driven by Rapid Uptake and Conversion of Simple Carbohydrates. ISME J (2012) 6(7):1415–26. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.212

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Chimenti MS, Triggianese P, Conigliaro P, Candi E, Melino G, Perricone R. The Interplay Between Inflammation and Metabolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Cell Death Dis (2015) 6:e1887. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. De Weirdt R, Possemiers S, Vermeulen G, Moerdijk-Poortvliet TCW, Boschker HTS, Verstraete W, et al. Human Faecal Microbiota Display Variable Patterns of Glycerol Metabolism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol (2010) 74(3):601–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00974.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Said HM, Mohammed ZM. Intestinal Absorption of Water-Soluble Vitamins: An Update. Curr Opin Gastroenterol (2006) 22(2):140–6. doi: 10.1097/01.mog.0000203870.22706.52

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Pompei A, Cordisco L, Amaretti A, Zanoni S, Matteuzzi D, Rossi M. Folate Production by Bifidobacteria as a Potential Probiotic Property. Appl Environ Microbiol (2007) 73(1):179–85. doi: 10.1128/Aem.01763-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Sugahara H, Odamaki T, Fukuda S, Kato T, Xiao JZ, Abe F, et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium Longum Alters Gut Luminal Metabolism Through Modification of the Gut Microbial Community. Sci Rep (2015) 5:13548. doi: 10.1038/srep13548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kaltsonoudis E, Papagoras C, Drosos AA. Current and Future Role of Methotrexate in the Therapeutic Armamentarium for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int J Clin Rheumatol (2012) 7(2):179–89. doi: 10.2217/ijr.12.10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Strickland KC, Krupenko NI, Krupenko SA. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Potentially Adverse Effects of Folate. Clin Chem Lab Med (2013) 51(3):607–16. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Whittle SL, Hughes RA. Folate Supplementation and Methotrexate Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review. Rheumatology (2004) 43(3):267–71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Al-Dabagh A, Davis SA, Kinney MA, Huang K, Feldman SR. The Effect of Folate Supplementation on Methotrexate Efficacy and Toxicity in Psoriasis Patients and Folic Acid Use by Dermatologists in the USA. Am J Clin Dermatol (2013) 14(3):155–61. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0017-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Zhang X, Zhang D, Jia H, Feng Q, Wang D, Liang D, et al. The Oral and Gut Microbiomes are Perturbed in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Partly Normalized After Treatment. Nat Med (2015) 21(8):895–905. doi: 10.1038/nm.3914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar