Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens
- 1Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- 2Department of Pharmacy, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States
- 3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- 4Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- 5Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- 6Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 7Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 8ASTHMA Inc. Clinical Research Center, Northwest Asthma and Allergy Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- 9Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- 10Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- 11Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
A Corrigendum on
Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens
by Sindher S, Long AJ, Purington N, Chollet M, Slatkin S, Andorf S, Tupa D, Kumar D, Woch MA, O’Laughlin KL, Assaad A, Pongracic J, Spergel JM, Tam J, Tilles S, Wang J, Galli SJ, Nadeau KC, Chinthrajah RS (2018). Front Immunol. 9:2689. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02689
In the original article, there was an error in the section “CTD-Dependent ROC for Clinical Thresholds,” Paragraph 3. The word “sesame” in this sentence is incorrect: “At defined values SPT had the best predictive value compared to sIgE and sIgEr. The PPV for all tested foods was 1 except for sesame, which was 0.95. Within sIgE values, sesame was the lowest at 0.64.”
A correction has been made to the above sentence, as follows: “At defined values SPT had the best predictive value compared to sIgE and sIgEr. The PPV for all tested foods was 1 except for pecan, which was 0.95. Within sIgE values, sesame was the lowest at 0.64.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Keywords: food challenge, cumulative tolerated dose, AUC, biomarker evaluation, time-dependent ROC
Citation: Sindher S, Long AJ, Purington N, Chollet M, Slatkin S, Andorf S, Tupa D, Kumar D, Woch MA, O’Laughlin KL, Assaad A, Pongracic J, Spergel JM, Tam J, Tilles S, Wang J, Galli SJ, Nadeau KC and Chinthrajah RS (2020) Corrigendum: Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens. Front. Immunol. 11:625796. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.625796
Received: 04 November 2020; Accepted: 05 November 2020;
Published: 30 November 2020.
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Copyright © 2020 Sindher, Long, Purington, Chollet, Slatkin, Andorf, Tupa, Kumar, Woch, O’Laughlin, Assaad, Pongracic, Spergel, Tam, Tilles, Wang, Galli, Nadeau and Chinthrajah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: R. Sharon Chinthrajah, schinths@stanford.edu