Jacob R. Hambrook
Patrick C. Hanington- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Human schistosomes combat the unique immune systems of two vastly different hosts during their indirect life cycles. In gastropod molluscs, they face a potent innate immune response composed of variable immune recognition molecules and highly phagocytic hemocytes. In humans, a wide variety of innate and adaptive immune processes exist in proximity to these parasites throughout their lifespan. To survive and thrive as the second most common parasitic disease in humans, schistosomes have evolved many techniques to avoid and combat these targeted host responses. Among these techniques are molecular mimicry of host antigens, the utilization of an immune resistant outer tegument, the secretion of several potent proteases, and targeted release of specific immunomodulatory factors affecting immune cell functions. This review seeks to describe these key immune evasion mechanisms, among others, which schistosomes use to survive in both of their hosts. After diving into foundational observational studies of the processes mediating the establishment of schistosome infections, more recent transcriptomic and proteomic studies revealing crucial components of the host/parasite molecular interface are discussed. In order to combat this debilitating and lethal disease, a comprehensive understanding of schistosome immune evasion strategies is necessary for the development of novel therapeutics and treatment plans, necessitating the discussion of the numerous ways in which these parasitic flatworms overcome the immune responses of both hosts.
Introduction to Schistosomes/Immunosuppression
All organisms must deal with threats in their environments to survive and thrive. The same is true of parasites, whose environments put them constantly at odds with host immune systems. Whereas some parasites have only one host and must therefore develop immune evasion/suppression tactics against only one type of immune system, others employ indirect life cycles, which means they encounter diverse immune systems that utilize unique strategies geared towards their death and destruction. Schistosomes, which are digenean trematodes of the genus Schistosoma, are one such parasite. These flatworms employ an indirect life cycle, alternating between a gastropod mollusc as an obligate intermediate host and a definitive vertebrate host such as a human (1). Schistosomiasis, the disease caused by schistosome infection of humans, is widely considered the second most important parasitic disease from a public health perspective, trailing only malaria. It afflicts an estimated 206 million people, killing up to 200,000 annually, and resulting in an estimated loss of between 1.9 and 3.3 million disability adjusted life years (2–4). Thus, a comprehensive examination and understanding of how these parasites evade the immune systems of such drastically different hosts has been and continues to be the focus of extensive investigation (5–7). This review seeks to highlight the foundational work which demonstrated schistosome evasion/suppression of the immune response in both host systems. Those specific components that have been implicated as being immunomodulatory, and other uncharacterized factors that bear similarities to known parasite immunomodulatory factors will be discussed.
The Gastropod Immune System
After emerging from its egg into freshwater, the miracidial stage of the schistosome life cycle seeks out a suitable snail host. Although the immune systems of snails lack the overall complexity and antibody mediated adaptive response seen in mammals, these invertebrates combat schistosome infections using a multitude of immune strategies resulting in larval damage and ultimately the killing of invading schistosomes (Figure 1A) (8, 9). Research into the immunological underpinnings of snail/schistosome interactions has been undertaken largely using the Schistosoma mansoni/Biomphalaria glabrata model system that exploits numerous B. glabrata strains that display different compatibility profiles with specific strains of S. mansoni. This allows for detailed examination of both the host immune response as well as parasite survival strategies (10, 11).
Figure 1 Immunosuppression tactics in the intermediate host. (A) Snails employ a wide variety of both humoral and cellular factors in combatting schistosome infections, many of which incorporate with each other to facilitate parasite killing. The humoral factors are largely composed of PRRs but also feature cytotoxic components such as biomphalysin. The cellular arm of the immune response features BgTLR displaying granulocytes, which envelope invading schistosomes, and hyalinocytes, which seemingly focus on the production of humoral factors and cell signaling molecules. (B) Parasites employ molecular mimicry by utilizing surface molecules and E/S products which share glycosylation patterns seen in snail plasma and on the surface of circulating hemocytes. Sharing such glycosylation patterns has been shown to correlate with survival during infection, suggesting these shared epitopes help schistosomes avoid recognition within the snail. (C) Molecular mimicry is also employed by the production of immune cell inactivating hormones like those produced by the snail which renders normally lethal hemocytes inactive and unable to kill invading sporocysts. (D) In order to avoid recognition by host pattern recognition receptors, schistosomes employ a highly variable series of polymorphic mucins. These mucins are recognized by host BgFREPs, and the variable nature of both the mucins and FREPs has led to the understanding that successful recognition of SmPoMucs by FREPs is a key determinant of infection success. If the host FREP can recognize the SmPoMucs and the surface of a sporocyst, that sporocyst will likely be killed, while having an unrecognizable SmPoMuc leads to immune evasion by avoiding BgFREP recognition. Such killing is thought to be at least partially dependent on a humoral BgFREP/BgTEP/Biomphalysin complex. (E) In order to generate a highly variable surface mucin, numerous processes occur to give rise to the considerable amount of variability seen between different sporocyst SmPoMucs. (F) Miracidia employ a venom allergen like protein which has been shown to upregulate the production of a B. glabrata matrix metalloproteinase (BgMMP1). This metalloproteinase is hypothesized to facilitate degradation of host connective tissues. Such degradation would allow for easier movement further into the host during initial infection. (G) E/S products from developing sporocysts facilitate the downregulation of key anti-parasitic functions in hemocytes. While some of these proteins have been identified, others remain of an unknown composition and are merely referred to by their size. (H) SmLeish-2 released by the parasite reduces hemocyte motility and therefore downregulates parasite encapsulation. This allows for continued movement and development of the sporocyst within the host.
Killing and elimination of invading miracidia and the sporocysts that they transform into relies primarily on coordination between the cellular and humoral immune responses of the snail. The immune cells, termed hemocytes, locate, surround, and encapsulate invading parasites. B. glabrata also features numerous immune molecules hypothesized to function in recognition of invading schistosomes such as the wide variety of leucine rich repeat-containing receptors including some canonical toll-like receptors (TLRs) (Figure 1A) and other pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as peptidoglycan recognition receptors (PGRPs), variable immunoglobulin and lectin domain-containing molecules, and the proteins encoded for in the Guadeloupe resistance complex (GRC) (8, 12–15).
As mentioned above, the humoral branch of the B. glabrata immune system is characterized as being important for recognition and clearance of S. mansoni and is largely composed of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Many of these PRRs have been found to contain at least one immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) domain next to an interceding region (ICR) (Figure 1A). Some of these ICRs are linked to galectin like domains, while others are linked to C-type lectin domains. These PRRs are referred to as Galectin-related proteins (GREPs) and C-type lectin related proteins (CREPS) (12).The most well characterized PRR in B. glabrata are the Fibrinogen related proteins (FREPs), which feature one or two IgSF domains linked to a fibrinogen like domain by an ICR (14). At least one FREP, FREP3, has the capacity to bind the surface of sporocysts and act as a opsonin, while siRNA mediated knockdown of FREP3 reduces resistance to S. mansoni challenge (16). B. glabrata FREPs (BgFREPs) possess the capacity to somatically diversify, which is a unique among invertebrates (17). Given the observation that schistosomes are in possession of polymorphic surface mucins that interact with FREPs, this somatic diversification suggests a possible form of adaptive immunity. This potential adaptive immunity is the subject of numerous investigations (18–20). In addition to these immunoglobulin-like domain containing PRRs, B. glabrata also possesses several thioester containing proteins (TEPs), which resemble complement component C3 in both form and function (21). The humoral immune response is not merely relegated to pathogen recognition; a β-pore forming toxin (β-PFT) known as biomphalysin is also able to directly kill S. mansoni sporocysts (22). Rather than functioning independently, at least three humoral immune components (BgFREPS, BgTEP, and biomphalysin) function as a unit to target and facilitate elimination of developing sporocysts (Figure 1D) (18).
Molecular Mimicry in the Gastropod Host
Avoiding immune recognition and destruction is mediated by a wide array of immune evasion techniques employed by invading miracidia and developing sporocysts (Figure 1B). First referred to as molecular mimicry in 1964, the process of parasites displaying antigens similar to those of their hosts has been a research topic of interest in numerous pathogen model systems (23, 24). The phenomenon has been shown to span numerous parasitological phyla, with some helminths utilizing glycans to mask their presence to their hosts (25). Some parasitic nematodes even employ glycans typically only found in vertebrates, suggesting that their use in parasites acts to hide the pathogen from the immune response (26).
The study of molecular mimicry in intermediate hosts was first reported in 1965 when in was observed that B. glabrata possessed similar antigens to those found in developing Schistosoma mansoni larvae (Figure 1B) (27). This was later confirmed by the development of polyclonal antibodies to hemolymph from S. mansoni resistant (10-R2) and susceptible (M-line) B. glabrata strains, with both reacting strongly with the surface of S. mansoni miracidia and sporocysts (28, 29). This association persisted for at least 48 h post transformation from miracidia to sporocyst, suggesting the developing larvae consistently share at least certain surface proteins during the first 48 h of infection, during which, they are most likely to be targeted by the snail immune response (28). Similarly, antibodies raised against whole sporocysts interact with the surface of B. glabrata hemocytes (30). Although these cross-reactive immunoglobulin tests suggest some form of molecular mimicry, such studies lack the necessary specificity for examination of shared antigens. Observed cross reactivity may simply be due to shared glycosylation patterns between the two invertebrates, with a variety of carbohydrates epitopes being found in both animals (31, 32). Often, such shared glycosylation patterns are featured at the surface of miracidia and sporocysts, although they may also be found in E/S products (33, 34). Although such similarities have suggested the employment of molecular mimicry for several decades, potential targets for such a phenomenon have emerged more recently. Differences in N-glycosylation patterns of hemolymph in the resistant BS-90 strain B. glabrata featured less glycan epitope similarities to S. mansoni than a susceptible B. glabrata strain (BgPR). This data provides support for the hypothesis that molecular mimicry might aid S. mansoni to avoid recognition by the varying lectins employed by B. glabrata as a means of immune recognition (35). This is further supported by the observation that hemolymph from susceptible B. glabrata strains, such as the NMRI snail strain, features a greater abundance of schistosome-like glycan epitopes in their hemolymph than resistant BS-90 strain snails (Figure 1B). Larval transformation products (LTPs) released by the parasite during miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation also participate in glycan mimicry (Figure 1B). Host hemolymph proteins and circulating hemocytes are capable of reacting with LTPs (36, 37). A differential binding pattern between LTPs and hemolyph proteins isolated from B. glabrata strains of varying compatibility with S. mansoni is observed using far-western blotting. This suggests the exploitation of differing glycan epitopes by S. mansoni during larval transformation (37). The attempts at mimicry made by S. mansoni are not limited to surface level epitopes, as sporocysts possess the capacity to produce host-like adrenocorticotropic hormone, which is processed by host hemocytes to become melanocyte-stimulating hormone, resulting in the rounding of hemocytes near the sporocyst (Figure 1C) (38).
Polymorphic Mucins
While molecular mimicry may very well function in hiding the parasite from the immune response of the snail, a new set of molecules that are distinct to the parasite have emerged as possible determinants of survival: S. mansoni polymorphic mucins or SmPoMucs (Figure 1D). These diverse proteins were first identified as part of a proteomics screen seeking to identify differentially abundant proteins produced by B. glabrata-compatible and incompatible strains of S. mansoni, and have gone on to be one of the most intensely studied components of resistance polymorphism in the B. glabrata/S. mansoni system (20, 39, 40). SmPoMucs consist of three distinct groups, each containing a characteristic C-terminal domain attached to a variable number of tandem repeats ranging from n = 1 to n~55 (41). These repeats, heavily composed of serine, threonine, and proline residues, allow for heavy glycosylation of these proteins, aiding in their classification as mucin-like molecules (41). Through a series of events including recombination, expression polymorphism, inheritable acetylation-based epigenetics, various mechanisms of post translational splicing, and differential glycosylation patterns, S. mansoni is capable of generating numerous different polymorphisms while only being in possession of an estimated 10 SmPoMuc genes (Figure 1E) (42–44). While different S. mansoni strains vary in their SmPoMucs transcript sequences and expression patterns of, such differences are also seen on an individual level between sporocysts (42, 43). In 2010, Moné and associates made the key observation that these diverse molecules could be found in association with somatically diversifying host immune molecules; FREPs and BgTEP (19). This is significant seeing as research demonstrating that a BgFREP/BgTEP complex can render susceptible snail hemocytes and plasma nearly as deadly to S. mansoni sporocysts as plasma from S. mansoni-resistant B. glabrata strains. Given the fact that SmPoMucs are found associated with the apical glands and E/S products of miracidia and sporocysts, SmPoMucs variability should be considered a key mechanism by which the parasite discourages recognition by key humoral immune complexes both at the surface of the parasite and in the surrounding tissues (18, 19, 40, 41). Given the somatic variation in BgFREPs, and the highly polymorphic nature of SmPoMucs, these interactions may prove to be supportive of the Red Queen Hypothesis whereby host and pathogen vary their respective molecular determinants of infection in order to survive (Figure 1D) (40).
Miracidia
When penetrating a suitable snail host, schistosomes are not restricted to molecular mimicry to evade detection and attack from molluscan immune cells. The first barrier miracidia face during intermediate host infection is passage through host tissues, a process thought to be facilitated by a thiol proteinase located in the lateral penetration glands of miracidia developing inside eggs (45). During initial penetration, larval transformation products (LTPs) released from the schistosome are also expected to aid in penetration while subsequently facilitating immune evasion (46). LTP contents have been examined using mass spectrometry, which revealed the presence of numerous factors involved in immune modulation, including but not limited to: proteases (a calpain, serine peptidase, leishmanolysin like protein), protease inhibitors (alpha-macroglobulin, cystatin B), ion binding proteins, antioxidant enzymes, and venom allergen like proteins, which are the most abundantly featured proteins present (47). One such venom allergen like protein (SmVAL9) has been shown to be key in facilitating the upregulation of extracellular matrix remodeling genes during penetration, as evidenced by in vitro observations using the B. glabrata embryonic cell line, suggesting that it may also be involved in movement throughout host tissues (Figure 1F) (48).
Developing Sporocysts
After miracidial penetration of the snail host, the developing sporocyst goes on to synthesize excreted/secreted (E/S) factors designed to facilitate survival and immune evasion (Figure 1G). Although nomenclature differs throughout the literature, for the purposes of this discussion, E/S products differ from LTPs in that they are produced during primary sporocyst culture, while LTPs are release during the miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation. These combinations of carbohydrates and proteins are predominantly produced 1 day post entry into the snail, implicating them as determinants of infection success in avoiding encapsulation by host hemocytes, a process which leads to damage of the parasite via ROS production, followed by death and elimination by phagocytosis of dead parasite material (49). Both microarray and serial analysis of gene expression techniques have been used to examine expression profiles in sporocysts, with a variety of proteases (cathepsin C, preprocathepsin L, hemoglobinase, and elastase) and antioxidants (Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, peroxiredoxins 1 and 2, and glutathione peroxidase) having been identified as upregulated factors potentially responsible for some of the inhibitory effects seen in the host (50, 51).
The effects of excreted/secreted schistosome products have largely been investigated by examining the effect of whole E/S products on various biochemical and immune related functions in host hemocytes. They alter hemocyte metabolism, as evidenced by their capacity to modulate protein secretion from hemocytes in various B. glabrata strains (Figure 1G) (52). They also modulate cell signaling, as evidenced by the fact that direct exposure of susceptible B. glabrata to E/S products reduces both MEK and ERK phosphorylation, two hallmarks of phosphokinase based signaling (53). Seeing as MEK and ERK phosphorylation are cell signaling pathways used to facilitate granulin mediated hemocyte proliferation, this reduction in phosphorylation may also serve to decrease the availability of appropriate levels of cytotoxic hemocyte populations (13). Another downstream result of ERK signaling is the presence of heat shock proteins, such as HSP70. HSP70 abundance decreases are susceptible to snail hemocytes exposed to S. mansoni E/S products (53). Given the role of HSPs in the stress response and as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), this may also be a mechanism by which schistosomes persist in their intermediate hosts (54). Exposure of hemocytes to E/S products can impact parasite targeting/recognition and killing (Figure 1G). These products are capable of suppressing hemocyte chemotaxis while also reducing their capacity to phagocytize foreign particles (55–57). They also prevent the production of superoxide anions and nitric oxide, a key method by which hemocytes kill invading sporocysts (58, 59).
To date, four specific factors present in the LTPs produced by S. mansoni have been functionally characterized. Upon entry into the snail, S. mansoni releases venom allergen like protein 9 (SmVAL-9), which results in the upregulation of a B. glabrata matrix metalloprotease (48). Given the role of such metalloproteases in remodeling tissue, it is hypothesized that this facilitates entry and penetration of the parasite into host tissue (Figure 1F). Two more immune modulators were identified as part of an examination into E/S product synthesis by sporocysts in vitro (49). The first is a polypeptide of roughly 24 kDa found to be capable of inhibiting protein synthesis by snail hemocytes, an effect that was seen in susceptible M-line snails, but not observed in the more resistant 10-R2 strain (58). The second is a molecule of 108 kDa in size, predicted to be composed of more than one 50 kDa domains. This 108 kDa protein was shown to be able to scavenge superoxide anions produced by phagocytosis-stimulated M-line B. glabrata hemocytes, thereby protecting the parasite from this toxic oxygen species (58). A fourth and more recently characterized protein was an invadolysin upregulated by S. mansoni 33.2-fold at 12 h post infection in B. glabrata. This matrix metalloprotease is similar to Leishmanolysin (GP63), the predominant immunomodulatory protein found on the surface of Leishmania sp (60). This invadolysin, termed SmLeish, was found to be capable of reducing the motility of susceptible M-line B. glabrata hemocytes (Figure 1H). This function is essential in reducing the frequency at which sporocysts are encapsulated by hemocytes in vitro, and was also found to be crucial for survival within B. glabrata (55).
Introduction to the Human Host
After leaving their snail intermediate host, cercaria move to the surface of the water column in the hopes of encountering a compatible mammalian host. For S. mansoni and S. haematobium, this means encountering a human or small rodent such as a mouse or rat (61). S. japonicum, on the other hand, is capable of infecting over 40 different mammalian species, although humans are one of the primary hosts (62). The environment inside of a human host differs drastically from that of a gastropod mollusc. While snails mount a capable and robust innate response, in humans, the innate and adaptive arms of a schistosomicidal immune response are brought to bear (63). Each life cycle stage that takes place within the mammalian host is presented with a unique set of immune challenges based upon the location in the host. The exact efficacy of these host immune processes remains an investigated manner. Early work demonstrated that mammalian effector cells such as neutrophils and eosinophils are capable of killing schistosomulae in vitro, especially in the presence of complement proteins and anti-schistosome immunoglobulins (63–65). Whether or not this occurs in vivo remains unascertained. Resistance to schistosome infection does vary between age groups, with children and teenagers featuring higher reinfection rates than adults, although it is not known for certain if this increase in resistance is age mediated or antibody based (66–69). It is clear that sterile immunity is not induced in humans after infections, but models suggest that the levels of protective immunity that are developed are likely caused by exposure to dead worm antigens (70). To counter the numerous challenges schistosomes face in their definitive hosts, these worms have developed several immune evasion mechanisms allowing for high infection loads and lifespans up to 37 years, indicating their capacity to survive and thrive despite the host immune response (71).
Initial Penetration
The first immune barrier that schistosomes encounter is the skin. The skin functions as a barrier to all pathogens and helps prevent the entry of parasites, fungi, bacteria, and viruses. The components of the skin relevant to schistosome infections are the epidermis, the dermis, and the basement membrane separating the two. The epidermis is largely composed of keratinocytes, which secrete lipids to aid in the formation of a barrier, but specialized dendritic cells known as Langerhans cells are also present and are capable of taking up antigen and migrating into the lymph system. The basement membrane is a network of connective molecules composed largely of Collagen type IV and Collagen type VII (72–74).. On the inner side of the basement membrane, the dermis exists as a layer of skin featuring nerve endings, hair follicles, muscles, and both blood and lymph vessels (72, 74).
In order to successfully develop as a schistosomula, cercariae must penetrate through the epidermis, basement membrane, and dermis in order to locate a venule or lymphatic vessel that will subsequently lead them to the lungs (75). A healthy debate exists as to the exact mechanism and kinetics by which this skin penetration occurs, but a variety of model systems have allowed for a better understanding of how cercariae complete this task. In mice, hamsters and rats, the time needed for half of S. mansoni to leave the skin is 88, 65, and 70 h, respectively (73). Studies using human skin explants have demonstrated that S. mansoni and S. haematobium seemingly have similar invasion kinetics to what is seen in rodent model systems, with penetration into the dermis and location of a venule taking between 48 and 72 h (76–78). Penetration by S. japonicum has been shown to proceed at a faster rate, with up to 90% of the parasites reaching the dermis/host venules within 24 h post infection, some even doing so in only 12 h (77). Such an rapid migration is also supported by the observation that S. japonicum reach the lungs of experimentally infected mice after 3 days, while S. mansoni and S. haematobium take 6 days (79). The time it takes for penetration to occur suggests that movement in the skin is not easy for the invading larvae, and suggests the need for developing mechanisms of avoid immune cells within both the epidermis and dermis, where numerous innate immune cells are present (Figure 2A).
Figure 2 Immunosuppression tactics in the human host. Schistosomes travelling through employ different immune evasion methodologies depending upon their location and life cycle stage. (A) As cercariae penetrate the skin, numerous proteases of different families help facilitate the cleavage of host molecules. The degradation of key structural components such as numerous collagens and elastin by these proteases helps the parasite descend through the epidermis, penetrate through the basement membrane, and eventually navigate the dermis in the search for a nearby venule. The invading larvae also release numerous immunosuppressants such as Sm16 and prostaglandins which alter leukocyte function in an attempt to avoid cell mediated death by creating a favorable immune environment. (B) Adults can also release molecules to reduce blood clotting in the area immediately surrounding a mated pair. This wide variety of molecules may be involved in the degradation of host plasma components to facilitate feeding, but their capacity to act as anti coagulants also implies the creating of a milieu in which the worms are able to move freely without fear of being killed by the coagulation of the blood in which they are emersed. (C) Adult worms in the mesenteric blood vessels incorporate host molecules into their tegument. Many of these molecules are important immune factors, which are bound in such a way as to prevent proper opsonization. IgG is found via its Fc portion, making in unrecognizable to cell found Fc receptors. Complement component C3 is also bound, although the effects of this association are not completely understood. Finally host MHCI can also be found bound to adult worms via its β2-microglobulin domain. The worm also targets mammalian factors not only for capture, but also for inactivation, as evidenced by schistosome paramyosin inhibiting membrane attack complex formation. (D) Schistosomes release a wide variety of parasite derived factors into their environment to create tolerable conditions for their survival. These molecules perform many different tasks, including the inhibition of cysteine proteases (Sj cysteine protease inhibitor), the blocking of neutrophil elastase (SmKI), and the alteration of antigen processing in macrophages (SjTpx). (E) Schistosome eggs release several factors which is key in skewing the T cell response towards the Th2 phenotype necessary for migration through the intestinal wall. These include α-1, which causes TH2 type granuloma formation through basophil mediated IL-4 production, and Ω-1, which brings about M2 polarization by altering dendritic cell antigen presentation. The chemokine binding protein SmCKBP is also present and reduces recruitment of varying leukocytes.
Penetration through the uppermost layers of the epidermis is aided by the aqueous environment in which they encounter their host, seeing as the lipid interactions holding together the stratum corneum are lessened/removed in such an environment (80). Once the schistosomes have passed through the upper layers of keratinocytes, they encounter resistance at the stratum spinosus, and proceed to facilitate the killing of nearby cells while also degrading the connections (largely composed of cadherins) between such cells. This process, as well as the subsequent degradation of host structural components, may be facilitated by both mechanical movement as well as factors that degrade cell–cell adhesions. Possible sources for such factors include the head gland, sub-tegumental cell bodies, and acetabular glands (73). While each of these sources may have roles in facilitating penetration, the most likely suspect remains the acetabular glands, cells featuring long duct-like cytoplasmic extensions leading to the anterior of the parasite that are packed with proteases (81). Acetabular gland secretions are produced during migration through the collagen rich basement membrane of the skin and have been confirmed to be secreting up to three days post infection. The cells of the acetabular gland atrophy between 48–72 h post infection, and are not thought to be a key factor in penetrating into host venules, a process which is thought to be mediate by the parasite’s head gland (75).The acetabular glands are, however, necessary for percutaneous infection using mechanically transformed cercariae. Thus, it is likely that these glands remain the predominant method by which human schistosomes facilitate entry through the skin (73, 80, 82–84).
Investigations into the proteolytic factors responsible for skin penetration have revealed of a wide variety of serine proteases as a means by which to degrade host structural components. S. mansoni, which has been studied extensively in this area, produces numerous serine proteases, which are expelled from its acetabular glands during penetration (Figure 2A). Among these proteases are a 28/30 kDa protease capable of cleaving casein, gelatin, C3, C3b laminin, fibronectin, keratin, and collagens type IV and VIII; a 47 kDa protease capable of cleaving gelatin, casein, collagen type VI, and elastin; and a 60 kDa protease capable of cleaving casein and gelatin (85–87). Inhibition of these serine proteases using serine protease inhibitors reduces the likelihood of successful penetration into human skin (88). Among these serine proteases, the 28/30 kDa variant that is referred to as SmCE (Schistosoma mansoni Cercarial Elastase) is the most crucial, as it composes roughly 36% of the total volume of acetabular gland contents (89). Inhibition of SmCE using the protease inhibitor succinyl-alanyl-alanyl-prolyl-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (AAPF-CMK) is capable of reducing cercarial penetration by up to 80% (90). Highlighting the importance of SmCE is its persistent presence throughout the intra-mammalian portion of the S. mansoni life cycle. A membrane bound version of the protein is found in cercariae, lung stage schistosomulae, and adult worms (91). While S. haematobium possess a protease like SmCE, it was long held that S. japonicum lacked any serine protease production whatsoever during initial penetration events because SmCE antibodies failed to react with S. japonicum cercarial extracts (92). More recent proteomic analysis of the host/parasite molecular interface during S. japonicum penetration into mouse skin revealed a single S. japonicum cercarial elastase (SjCE2b) made in cercaria and localized to the acetabular glands, although levels of this protein pale in comparison to what is found in S. mansoni and S. haematobium (93).
Given the relative difference in serine protease abundance between varying species of human schistosomes, other factors must participate in the cercarial penetration event. Cathepsins have emerged as an alternative facilitator of penetration (Figure 2A). S. japonicum cercaria, despite lower protein output during transformation to schistosomulae than S. mansoni, exhibit up to 40-fold more cathepsin-B-like activity than their S. mansoni counterparts (92). Additionally, proteomic analysis of the proteases found in S. japonicum cercaria and schistosomulae have identified five different cathepsins and only one serine protease (93). Given that S. japonicum is considered to be a more ancestral species of schistosome than S. mansoni or S. haematobium, it is possible that these cathepsins are an evolutionarily older mechanism of facilitating penetration into a wider variety of hosts. Seeing as S. japonicum has been observed to elicit more of a swollen red bump at the site of penetration, it is possible that the expanded use of serine proteases in S. mansoni in particular could have resulted from an evolutionary attempt to move away from Cathepsins as a penetration facilitating molecule given their immunostimulatory properties in humans (92). S. mansoni still produces cathepsins, two of which (Cathepsin L1 and Cathepsin B) are present in the post acetabular glands of the parasite. Given the function of post acetabular glands in producing mucous like substances to facilitate attachment to host skin, it is possible that these cysteine proteases may have a role in overcoming the skin as an immune barrier. Alternatively, the involvement of cathepsin activity in the adult schistosome gut suggests that the presence of cathepsins in cercaria also has the potential to serve as nothing more than evidence of the development of factors necessary for digestion in subsequent life cycle stages (94).
Cercaria, as well as the skin stage schistosomula into which they develop, must also contend with a variety of different immune cells in the skin. The immune response commences early during penetration in the epidermis, with HLA-DR+ cells, likely Langerhans cells, having been shown to aggregate at the sight of infection within 48 h, while keratinocytes respond to penetration by the release of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1α and IL-1β (77, 95). Additionally, fluorescent imaging has revealed that neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells are all capable of internalizing the products released by cercariae upon penetration (96). Eosinophils and neutrophils can kill developing schistosomula with the aid of complement components and immunoglobulins in vitro. Thus, one can assert that humans possess a more than adequate array of schistosomicidal immune cells in the skin that could kill the developing larvae in the absence of immunomodulatory factors (65).
Several candidate immune modulators produced by skin staged schistosomula have been identified (Figure 2A). However, only a few of which have been functionally characterized to date. Chief among these modulators is an anti-inflammatory protein termed Sm16/SmSLP/SmSPO-1. This 16.8 kDa protein composes roughly 3–4% of the protein secreted from cercariae during 0–3 h post infection, suggesting a role in parasite survival (89). It has been demonstrated that Sm16 can alter cytokine profiles. It downregulates Il-1α production in keratinocytes, lowers ICAM-1 expression in endothelial cells, prevents LPS induced neutrophil movement into the dermis, and reduces LPS mediated IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β production. In mice, it lessens the capacity of mouse bone marrow derived macrophages from producing Il-12p40, IL-10, and IFN-γ-induced production, while also slowing antigen processing by phagocytic cells (97–100). The Sm16 counterpart in S. japonicum, termed Sj16, has also been shown to possess immunomodulatory properties, including a reduction in macrophage maturation, while also modulating cytokine production in thioglycolate-induced peritoneal mouse cells by upregulating IL-10 and IL-1RA, while downregulating MIP-2, IL-1β and IL-12p35 (101). Interestingly, Sj16 is also capable of increasing the abundance of CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, thereby suggesting that it not only has the capacity to downregulate inflammatory responses, but may also contribute to the development of a regulatory response (102). Originally, the roughly 30% similarity that Sm16 features with human stathmin led researchers to hypothesize that Sm16 functioned as a microtubule destabilizing protein. This suggestion has been disproven, and it has been shown that Sm16 actually assembles as a 9 unit lipid bilayer-associated oligomer that is capable of altering both TLR4 and TLR3 signaling (99, 103). Despite this plethora of functions, immunization of mice against Sm16, as well as infections with Sm16 RNAi knockdown parasites reveals that elevated humoral and cellular immunity to Sm16 do not confer protective immunity n mice, with worm burden and egg laying remaining unchanged (104). Given that natural infections with S. mansoni (in humans) and S. japonicum (in rabbits) fail to elicit strong antibody mediated responses, Sm16, long considered a possible vaccine candidate, does not merit investigation as such (101, 105).
Other, perhaps less well known/examined immunomodulators are also features of schistosome infections in the human skin (Figure 2A). Some, such as the 23 kDa S. mansoni-derived apoptosis inducing factor, seemingly exert their immunomodulatory properties by direct targeting of T cells. Schistosome E/S fractions containing a 23 kDa protein have been shown to specifically target T lymphocytes for apoptosis, a process thought to be mediated by causing an upregulation of both the Fas Ligand and Fas receptor on CD3+ cells (106). This destruction of T lymphocytes during initial penetration may be partially to blame for the inability of immunized mouse lymphocytes to recognize the E/S products of invading parasites, as a proper T cell mediated response would be severely hampered (107). Other molecules may act by instead modulating the cytokine environment in which the parasite finds itself. S. mansoni can produce prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), while also producing an E/S product of less than 30 kDa in size that can upregulate the production PGE2 and IL-10 from human keratinocytes. This seems to be of significant importance to the kinetics of infection, as IL-10 deficient mice are able to slow schistosomula travel through the skin and into the lungs (108). Both the 23 kDa and 30 kDa immunomodulatory factors were identified via fractionation of schistosome E/S products, with the exact molecular identity having not yet been ascertained. The use of Prostaglandins is not limited to PGE2, however, as PGD2 produced by the parasite inhibits the migration of epidermal Langerhan cells to nearby lymph nodes (109). Given that production of PGD2 by S. mansoni has been demonstrated to require a 28 kD Glutathione S-transferase, an interest in exploiting such a factor as a possible vaccine candidate was explored during the early 1990s. Unfortunately, recent phase 3 clinical trials of the S. haematobium derived rSh28GST (Bilhvax) vaccine proved ineffective in granting significant immunity (110–113). Finally, a family of venom allergen like proteins was identified as possible immune modulators. The S. mansoni genome was demonstrated to feature 29 of these proteins, which are defined by the presence of a Sperm-coating protein/Tpx-1/Ag5/PR-1/Sc7 (SCP/TAPS) domain (114). SmVALS 4, SmVAL 10, and SmVAL 18 were identified as being present in the E/S components from cercaria and compose roughly 3% of the normalized proteins found therein using mass spectrometry. The presence of SmVAL24 in the acetabular glands has been observed via whole-mount in situ hybridization (89, 115). To date, only two of these SmVAL proteins have been functionally characterized. SmVAL4 possesses lipid and cholesterol binding capacity, although how this might result in the modulation of the host immune response has not yet been examined (116). SmVAL18, on the other hand, has been shown to bind plasminogen, and help facilitate its cleavage into plasmin, which plays a role in the degradation of complement components, extracellular matrix proteins, and fibrinolysis. Thus, SmVAL18 could conceivably help the parasite migrate through the skin and avoid blood clotting during penetration into a venule (117). In S. japonicum, only one VAL, Sj-VAL-1 has been examined and has been shown to localize to the penetration and head glands of cercariae, suggesting a possible role in migration into host venules (118).
In addition to those immune mediators that have been characterized, numerous other parasite-derived factors hypothesized to be involved in overcoming the immune response in the skin have been identified by genomic, transcriptomics and proteomic approaches (Figure 2A). One interesting possible series of targets are metalloproteases. In S. mansoni, genomic data suggests the presence of 114 metalloproteases, 35 of which were found to have differential transcription through different live cycle stages (114, 119). Of note was the presence of seven invadolysins, five of which were upregulated preferentially in the germ ball stage of development, and two of which were most upregulated in the cercaria. Given that one invadolysin (Smp_090100.1) constitutes 12.8% of the protein secreted during the first 3 h of infection, while another (Smp_135530) was shown to be a key determinant of infection status in the intermediate host, investigations into the role of such proteases is merited in the context of mammalian infection (55, 89). This is supported by recent findings examining proteins expressed during S. japonicum penetration, which suggest the expression of six different invadolysins, five of which continued to be expressed by schistosomula after successful migration through the skin (93). Another potential immunomodulator yet to be functionally characterized is SmKK7, a protein bearing significant homology to K+ channel blockers in scorpion venom, which could foreseeably function in inhibiting the activation of surrounding lymphocytes (89).
Despite the diverse and plentiful existence of these factors secreted by invading cercaria/skin stage schistosomula, schistosomes do not merely rely on the release of immunomodulatory molecules into the skin meant to ward off effector immune cells. The parasite must also deal with the potential of being opsonized by complement components and immunoglobulins and has therefore evolved both surface-associated factors and the use of secreted products to combat host innate and adaptive responses. This process begins during the first 3 h of invasion, wherein the schistosomula rapidly seeks to shed the proteins and carbohydrates composing its glycocalyx (Figure 2A). While the glycocalyx serves an important role in mediating survival under the high osmotic pressures seen during the free living aquatic cercarial stage of life, once in the skin, it is a potent target for both the classical and alternative pathways for the complement system (120). While the process of losing the glycocalyx is facilitated in part by mechanical movement throughout the epidermis, the close association of SmCE has been suggested as a possible aid during this process.
While the glycocalyx is shed, schistosomulae also undergo a complex reorganization of their outer membrane in which they go from a trilaminate state into a heptalaminate state that persists into adulthood (121). This newly formed heptalaminate membrane then begins to display several surface-bound factors geared towards disabling complement and immunoglobulin-based attacks. One such molecule is paramyosin, which has been shown in association with both schistosomula and adult worms. Paramyosin has been shown to bind complement components C1, C8, and C9, thereby inhibiting polymerization and deposition of the membrane attack complex on schistosomulae exposed to human serum (122). The membrane has also been shown to feature a receptor capable of binding to the Fc fragment of human IgG (but not IgE, IgA, and IgM), while also binding to the β2-microglublin found in the human major histocompatibility complex (123). Such binding could conceivably function in masking the schistosomula with host proteins, but the orientation of binding also suggests it is a mechanism of rendering IgG unable to signal to surrounding effector cells. With the Fc portion of IgG bound to the schistosome, the antibody-dependent cytotoxicity employed by cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils cannot occur due to the inability of IgG to bind the Fc receptor on the surface of such cells. Immunoglobulins in the immediate area of the infection appear to be targeted by serine proteases secreted from the schistosomula, as surface bound IgG is cleaved into Fc and soluble Fab fragments in a manner inhibited by the serine protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (124). Additionally, soluble IgE is cleaved by a schistosomula derived serine protease likely to be SmCE, as a specific inhibitor of this factor inhibits IgE cleavage (125).
Immunosuppression by Schistosomula in the Lungs
After successfully reaching either a venule or lymphatic vessel, schistosomes begin their migration through the bloodstream towards the lungs, where they will mature for a few days prior to continuing to the liver. While some immune mediators used in the skin continue to be used in the lungs (Sm16, Sj16, venom allergen like proteins, surface paramyosin), exposure of the larvae to lung epithelial cells elicits new immunomodulatory mechanisms (126). This is particularly crucial given the observation that vaccination with radiated parasites results in protective immunity that largely results in parasite killing in the lungs, suggesting that immunosuppression in the lungs is key to survival and establishment in the host (127). Although the entirety of how this resistance is mediated is poorly understood, it appears that several E/S products of lung-stage schistosomula elicit a strong Th1 type immune response that requires cooperation with Th17 and Th2 factors in order to facilitate larval death (128, 129).
To date, the factors produced by lung stage schistosomes remain poorly examined due to difficulty of isolation, prior focus on the skin stage larvae as potential vaccine targets, and a lack of standardization of the transformation and culture conditions during in vitro culturing of lung-stage larvae. Despite this, some studies have gone on to perform both transcriptomic analysis of lung stage larvae, as well as proteomic screens, and have identified factors thought to target host leukocytes (130, 131). One protein found to be transcriptionally upregulated was a venom allergen like protein, suggesting the presence of this protein family in yet another life cycle stage of S. mansoni (130). Another potential target identified by both a microarray analysis and transcriptomics screen in S. mansoni was a protein simply termed Antigen 5 which bears homology to an antigen from Echinococcus granulosis hydatid cysts. This antigen is thought to be immunomodulatory, although a particular mechanism has yet to be described (130–132).
When mechanisms designed to hamper the activation and engagement of effector cells fail, schistosomes must be able to withstand to withstand the cytotoxic effects of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in order to survive. In fact, immune responses that effectively generate large amounts of these reactive species have been shown to correlate with larval death (128). Schistosomes switch from relying on aerobic metabolism to anaerobic metabolism one during their first two weeks in their definitive host, which is hypothesized to be at least partially responsible for their gain in resistance to nitric oxide mediated killing (133, 134). This is significant given the observation that nitric oxide is a significant determinant of infection success in vivo, with nitric oxide synthase knockout Rattus norvegicus showing a significant decrease in resistance to S. japonicum infection (135). In order to combat H2O2, however, schistosomes appear to utilize surface-associated peroxiredoxin-1as a scavenger molecule, as evidenced by the fact that RNAi mediated knockdown of this molecule renders S. japonicum susceptible to H2O2 (136).
Finally, schistosomula must also overcome a significant barrier during their trip throughout the vasculature, to the lungs, as well as their adults lives thereafter: human blood. Although leukocytes are correctly pointed to as the main sources of immunity in whole human blood, it is important to recognize that blood coagulation and platelet deposition surrounding pathogens is also a key mechanism by which humans fight off infection. Schistosomes have evolved mechanisms to avoid clot formation in their immediate vicinity. In both S. japonicum and S. mansoni surface bound enolases are employed as plasminogen binding proteins that increase the amount of active plasmin in close proximity to the parasite. Active plasmin surrounding the parasite results in an increase in fibrinolytic activity (137, 138). Although these enolases have been shown to facilitate this process both in vivo and in vitro, it would appear as though the plasmin activity facilitated by all three of the major human schistosomes does not rely solely on enolases, as up to 10 plasminogen binding proteins have been identified via western blotting techniques. RNAi-mediated KD of enolases does not significantly inhibit schistosomula associated plasmin activity, suggesting other as of yet unidentified factors are also involved in the inhibition of clot formation (137).
Adults
Adult schistosomes incorporate many different strategies to avoid and overcome the host immune response (Figure 2C). The first of these strategies is the capacity of adult schistosomes to incorporate host antigens on their surface in an attempt to hide themselves from host immune factors. This was first suggested by the work of Smithers et al. in which adult worms were transplanted into a host of a different species. After these transplants, the adult worms would usually survive, unless the recipient host had been vaccinated with antigens from the donor host species prior to the infection, in which case most worms would die. This strongly suggested incorporation of host molecules onto the surface of the worm (139). This work would become a staple of parasitology classes and helped lay the foundation for future work into schistosome host antigen absorption. Subsequent work has demonstrated that this incorporation of host products is not a random process, nor a result of the generalized “stickiness” of the glycocalyx. It is, rather, due to the presence of receptors for various host antigens (Figure 2C). Receptors for the Fc portion of immunoglobulins, one of which has been shown to be a paramyosin as well as a β2-microglobulin in a MCH class I receptor, and a C3 receptor explains the presence of these molecules on the surface of the worm (123, 140, 141). Although the binding of IgG via its Fc region renders it unable to bind the Fc receptor on circulating effector cells, the exact orientation/function of complement component C3 binding is not known (Figure 2C). Adult schistosomes are also capable of incorporate host CD44 into the outer portion of their tegument, especially on the tips of the adult spines (142). To date, an immunological function of CD44 being used by the worm remains to be identified.
Another immune evasion method is molecular mimicry, which is employed by adult schistosomes via the production of molecules bearing significant homology to host signaling molecules. Schistosomes have been shown to produce levels of adrenocorticotropic hormones, which, when processed by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes into alpha- melanotropin, results in the subsequent inactivation of these cells, and could potentially decrease Th1 cell activation (143, 144). Additionally, schistosomes have the capacity to generate substances bearing similarities to morphine and codeine, which had the effect of decreasing leukocyte activation (144, 145).
While the exploitation and mimicry of host molecules greatly aid the worm during infection, they are also capable of employing novel self-made mechanisms of interfering with the human immune response (Figure 2D). The production of immunomodulatory elements in adults occurs early in their arrival to the hepatic portal system or venous plexus. In S. japonicum, unique factors are shown to be produced as early as day 14 post infection. Identified among the E/S proteins from 14-day old S. japonicum are a cystatin and an integrin. The cystatin is hypothesized to induce the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages, which are characteristic of a Th2 type responses that are less toxic to larvae than Th1 type inflammatory response. The integrin is hypothesized to mediate T cell migration, which might alter cytokine production in the milieu surrounding the larval parasite, lessening the immune challenges it may face in the lungs (146). While these cell targeting factors have yet to be functionally characterized, at least one S. japonicum Thioredoxin peroxidase (SjTPx) has. It is a protein released from 14 day old schistosomula that has been shown to reduce the presence of MHCII and CD86 on LPS stimulated RAW macrophages, thereby implicating it in downregulating of antigen presentation and subsequent T cell activation (146).
Many immunomodulatory factors are found in the tegument, the multi-layered outer surface of the parasite which is capable of quick self-renewal after damage, a process mediated by a population of somatic stem cells with a propensity to differentiate into tegument associated cells (147).The factors within the tegument have been extensively examined (148, 149). In S. japonicum, one such factor, S. japonicum tetraspanning orphan receptor (SjTOR), proves to be yet another component in fighting complement mediated death, and has been shown to bind complement component C2, while preventing complement mediated cell lysis (150). The tegument is also home to the S. mansoni Kunitz type protease inhibitor (SmKI-1), a potent serine protease inhibitor with similarities to the Kunitz type protease inhibitors found in the gut of Fasciola hepatica (151). In S. mansoni, it is present both in the tegument of adult worms, as well as their E/S products (Figure 2D) (152). This particular inhibitor was shown to be crucial for parasite survival within mice, as siRNA KD of SmKI-1 resulted in increased killing via neutrophil elastase, a molecule the inhibitor was shown to target in vitro (153). SmKI-1 is accompanied in the tegument by Sm200, a 200 kDa protein used for diagnostic purposes, but whose only characterized function to date is the causation of an increased abundance in IL-10 secretion from surrounding cells (154). In S. japonicum, another protease inhibitor, this one of the cysteine variety, has been shown to inhibit the lysosomal cysteine protease of dendritic cells, while also reducing their antigen processing/presentation on MHC class II (155). Clearly, these two protease inhibitors are evolved mechanisms meant to prevent cell mediated killing should the parasites attempts at avoiding cell recognition/contact fail (155). Lastly, thought-provoking work into the mechanisms by which adult schistosomes release immunomodulatory factors into the host revealed that they are not restricted to proteins shed as part of the membrane, but that they also employ exosome-like vesicles that drive classical activation of macrophages (156–158). Earlier examinations of the surface adult surface demonstrated the release of portions of the tegument, but did not make note of observing such small, exosome like vesicles (121, 159, 160).
Another significant barrier to overcome that adult worms must face is survival in the host bloodstream. Given the long lifespans of adult schistosomes, in addition to their relatively small size (approximately 1cm in length), constant exposure to blood clotting factors put them at risk of immobility and subsequent death. While the presence of the enolases seen in schistosomulae have been confirmed in adults, a bevy of other possible anti-coagulation mechanisms have been identified in adult worms. This is perhaps most clearly demonstrated by the fact that addition of mated pairs of adult worms to murine blood significantly reduces coagulation, while at 7 weeks post infection with S. mansoni, mouse blood features clots that break down more easily (161). While this general observation of anticoagulation is interesting, the past few decades have allowed for a more refined understanding of the exact molecules present at the surface of the parasite that allow for such activity (Figure 2B). Among the specific anticoagulants discovered are the kininogen cleaving serine protease Sk1, the α- and γ-thrombin binding/inhibiting membrane bound antigen Sm22.6, the ATP-diphosphohydrolase enzyme SmATPDase1 that cleaves the platelet activator ADP, the more recently characterized tegumental calpains S, Calp1 and SmCalp2 that cleave host fibrinogen, and finally, the secreted serine protease SmSP2 that activates parts of the fibrinolytic system and promotes vasodilation (162–165). The discovery of these specific factors clearly demonstrate that schistosomes have evolved a large variety of methods by which to ensure their free movement and survival within host vasculature (Figure 2B) (166). While attacks on the parasite outer surface by blood borne factors are well characterized, less is known about how the parasite survives the host immune mediators that it internalizes during feeding on host erythrocytes. Of note is the observation that one of the several proteases the schistosome gut produces for digestion of RBCs, cathepsin D, is also capable of cleaving IgG and complement component C3, although it is not known if this functions as an immune evasion technique for combatting gut permeabilization or is rather just part of digesting these factors as possible nutrient sources (167). The contents of the adult gut are not limited to proteases, seeing as a recent study demonstrated that a micro-exon gene (MEG) protein MEG-14 interacts with and sequesters the pro-inflammatory human calgranulin S100A9, suggesting a possible role in immune downregulation (168, 169). Perhaps one of the more remarkable things about schistosomes in the blood is their capacity to utilize ingested blood components to modulate the surrounding immune response. This is made evident by the observation that hemozoin, the biproduct of erythrocyte digestion composed of heme molecules, is regurgitated by the worm, taken up by macrophages, and downregulates the Th2 types response seen during egg laying (170).
Eggs
The eggs laid by schistosomes are the primary cause of pathology associated with human schistosomiasis. This has resulted in significant amounts of research going into understanding the immunological milieu surrounding these eggs. While many aberrantly migrating eggs become lodged in the liver, they typically seek to exit the host via the intestines/bladder. The process by which the eggs exit the host have been reviewed extensively; therefore here we seek to highlight the specific factors excreted by the eggs to modulate/downplay the host response during the migration through the host intestines and bladder (171, 172). Schistosome eggs are composed of a thick protein shell, a cell derived envelope responsible for the secretion of various factors, and the developing miracidium (173, 174). Adult female schistosomes are estimated to lay roughly 300 eggs per day during their peak reproductive ages, and while many of these eggs will aberrantly migrate to the liver where they reside until death, successful eggs will begin their migration through the intestine towards the intestinal lumen (175). This process is accompanied by the formation of a granuloma surrounding the eggs. While schistosome egg antigens have been shown to be capable of inducing apoptosis of host cells, the parasite appears to harness the host immune response in order to facilitate egg movement towards the lumen. This is made evident by the fact that egg laying coincides with the appearance of a Th2 type response in the host, and a similar response can by induced via the direct injection of eggs into the anterior mesenteric veins of mice (176). In mice, a balance between host Th1 and Th2 responses to schistosome eggs is necessary, seeing as deficiencies in either result in accelerated pathology and subsequent death. That having been said, the observation that IL-4 and Il-13 negative mice rarely pass eggs in their feces suggests that a Th2 type granuloma response is imperative for the egg to reliably exit the intestinal wall successfully (177, 178). To date, two specific molecules have been identified that have been shown to drastically skew the T cell response in granulomas towards a Th2 type response. The first of these is a major glycoprotein known as alpha-1 (α-1), also referred to as the Il-4 inducing principle of S. mansoni eggs (IPSE). IPSE is recognized as an antigen by basophils, subsequently resulting in an increased amount of IL-4 production and an alteration of the T helper cell response (Figure 2E) (179). Of note is the observation that this molecule is also capable of upregulating Il-10 production in B cells, thereby increasing the proliferation of regulatory T cells, a process that may be more important in dealing with granulomas in the liver (180). Intriguingly, α-1 is not the only Th2 inducing glycoprotein secreted by schistosome eggs, as another glycoprotein, Omega1 (Ω-1), a T2 ribonuclease, has shown to be the primary method by which the eggs induce a Th2 response (181). Ω -1 does not affect IL-4 release from basophils like its counterpart, α-1, but rather it targets dendritic cell (DC) functions (Figure 2E) (182). In 2012, it was shown that Ω-1’s glycosylation patterns allow it to be internalized by DCs via binding to the mannose receptor, while ribonuclease activity results in lowered protein synthesis via the cleavage of host rRNA and mRNA (183). The significance of this molecule in driving the immune response surrounding schistosome eggs was recently demonstrated in the first ever published occurrence of CRISPR-mediated knockout of a S. mansoni gene, which resulted in a decrease in Th2 cytokine production from macrophage/T cell co cultures, while also decreasing the volume of murine pulmonary granulomas (184). This skewing of the immune response allows for granulomas composed of alternatively activated macrophages, dendritic cells, lymphocytes, basophils, and eosinophils. Each of these cell types plays different roles in helping to facilitate movement through the intestinal via the degradation of host tissue. This degradation is thought to be aided at least in part by SmEnolase and SmCalp1, whose presence in the eggs is thought to aid in fibrinolysis (137, 163). Additionally the egg is thought to facilitate its own survival by producing SmKI-1 as a method of surviving neutrophil elastase mediate death, while also producing a chemokine binding protein (SmCKBP) that reduces inflammation and inflammatory cell recruitment via the binding of CXCL8 and CCL3 (Figure 2E) (185). These immune modulating and immune evading tactics allow for the egg to migrate through the host intestine/bladder, so that they may eventually be excreted in order to commence their life cycle anew.
Conclusion
Schistosomes have evolved an indirect life cycle featuring both an intermediate gastropod host in which they undergo asexual replication and a mammalian definitive host, including humans, in which adult worms inhabiting the bloodstream undergo sexual reproduction. This complex life cycle has led schistosomes to develop a bevy of mechanisms to avoid being killed by the immune system of either the snail or human hosts. In snails, a mixture of molecular mimicry and E/S products from the developing larvae are utilized to target host hemocytes and prevent their movement, engagement, and killing of the parasite. In humans, various proteases are used to enter the host, after which each life cycle stage produces numerous factors meant for the specific targeting of particular cell types relevant to survival at each stage of development within the host. Given recent advancements in praziquantel administration efforts correlating with a decrease in estimated schistosome infections worldwide, hope exists for the eventual elimination of this deadly and debilitating disease (186). That having been said, an estimated 200 million people are still infected with schistosomiasis, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutics, as well as the possible development of a vaccine. Research into understanding the mechanisms employed by the parasite to survive in both hosts remains crucial in better understanding infection outcomes. The progression in this field from basic observational research all the way to targeted gene deletions suggests a bright future for research into schistosome immune evasion strategies.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada #2018-05209 and 2018-522661 (PCH) and an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Graduate Studentship - 201810623-RA (JRH).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet (2014) 383(9936):2253–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2
2. Ezeamama AE, Bustinduy AL, Nkwata AK, Martinez L, Pabalan N, Boivin MJ, et al. Cognitive deficits and educational loss in children with schistosome infection—A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2018) 12(1):e0005524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005524. Garba A, editor.
3. McManus DP, Bergquist R, Cai P, Ranasinghe S, Tebeje BM, You H. Schistosomiasis—from immunopathology to vaccines. Semin Immunopathol (2020) 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00789-x
4. Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME, Bethony J, Diemert DD. Advancing the Development of a Human Schistosomiasis Vaccine. Trends Parasitol (2019) 35(2):104–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.10.005
5. Global Health, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. CDC - Global Health - Neglected Tropical Diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/ntd/index.html
6. King CH, Dangerfield-Cha M. The unacknowledged impact of chronic schistosomiasis. Chronic Illn (2008) 4(1):65–79. doi: 10.1177/1742395307084407
7. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A. Schistosomiasis in Africa: An emerging tragedy in our new global health decade. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2009) 3(9):e485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000485
8. Pila EA, Li H, Hambrook JR, Wu X, Hanington PC. Schistosomiasis from a Snail’s Perspective: Advances in Snail Immunity. Trends Parasitol (2017) 33(11):845–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.07.006
9. Coustau C, Gourbal B, Duval D, Yoshino TP, Adema CM, Mitta G. Advances in gastropod immunity from the study of the interaction between the snail Biomphalaria glabrata and its parasites: A review of research progress over the last decade. Fish Shellfish Immunol (2015) 46(1):5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.01.036
10. Newton WL. The Establishment of a Strain of Australorbis glabratus Which Combines Albinism and High Susceptibility to Infection with Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol (1955) 41(5):526. doi: 10.2307/3273814
11. Paranse WL, Correa LR. Variation in Susceptibility of Populations of Australorbis glabratus to a Strain of Schistosoma mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo (1963) 5(1):15–22.
12. Dheilly NM, Duval D, Mouahid G, Emans R, Allienne JF, Galinier R, et al. A family of variable immunoglobulin and lectin domain containing molecules in the snail Biomphalaria glabrata. Dev Comp Immunol (2015) 48(1):234–43. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2014.10.009
13. Pila EA, Gordy MA, Phillips VK, Kabore AL, Rudko SP, Hanington PC. Endogenous growth factor stimulation of hemocyte proliferation induces resistance to Schistosoma mansoni challenge in the snail host. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2016) 113(19):5305–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521239113
14. Gordy MA, Pila EA, Hanington PC. The role of fibrinogen-related proteins in the gastropod immune response. Fish Shellfish Immunol (2015) 46(1):39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.03.005
15. Tennessen JA, Théron A, Marine M, Yeh JY, Rognon A, Blouin MS. Hyperdiverse Gene Cluster in Snail Host Conveys Resistance to Human Schistosome Parasites. PLoS Genet (2015) 11(3):e1005067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005067. Lazzaro BP, editor.
16. Hanington PC, Forys MA, Dragoo JW, Zhang SM, Adema CM, Loker ES. Role for a somatically diversified lectin in resistance of an invertebrate to parasite infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107(49):21087–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011242107
17. Zhang SM, Adema CM, Kepler TB, Loker ES. Diversification of Ig superfamily genes in an invertebrate. Science (80- ) (2004) 305(5681):251–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1088069
18. Li H, Hambrook JR, Pila EA, Gharamah AA, Fang J, Wu X, et al. Coordination of humoral immune factors dictates compatibility between Schistosoma mansoni and Biomphalaria glabrata. Elife (2020) 9:e51708. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51708
19. Moné Y, Gourbal B, Duval D, du Pasquier L, Kieffer-Jaquinod S, Mitta G. A large repertoire of parasite epitopes matched by a large repertoire of host immune receptors in an invertebrate host/parasite model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2010) 4(9):e813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000813
20. Mitta G, Gourbal B, Grunau C, Knight M, Bridger JM, Théron A. The Compatibility Between Biomphalaria glabrata Snails and Schistosoma mansoni: An Increasingly Complex Puzzle. Adv Parasitol (2017) 97:111–45. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.08.006
21. Portet A, Galinier R, Pinaud S, Portela J, Nowacki F, Gourbal B, et al. BgTEP: An antiprotease involved in innate immune sensing in Biomphalaria glabrata. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1206. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01206
22. Galinier R, Portela J, Moné Y, Allienne JF, Henri H, Delbecq S, et al. Biomphalysin, a New β Pore-forming Toxin Involved in Biomphalaria glabrata Immune Defense against Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Pathog (2013) 9(3):e1003216. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003216
23. Damian RT. Molecular mimicry revisited. Parasitol Today (1987) 3(9):263–6. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(87)90102-5
24. Damian RT. Molecular Mimicry: Antigen Sharing by Parasite and Host and Its Consequences. Am Nat (1964) 98(900):129–49. doi: 10.1086/282313
25. van Die I, Cummings RD. Glycan gimmickry by parasitic helminths: A strategy for modulating the host immune response? Glycobiology (2010) 20(1):2–12. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwp140
26. Duffy MS, Morris HR, Dell A, Appleton JA, Haslam SM. Protein glycosylation in Parelaphostrongylus tenuis - First description of the Galα1-3Gal sequence in a nematode. Glycobiology (2006) 16(9):854–62. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwl001
27. Capron A, Biguet J, Rose F, Vernes A. The antigens of Schistosoma mansoni. II. Comparative immunoelectrophoretic study on various larval stages and of adults of both sexes. Immunological aspects of the host-parasite relationships of S. mansoni cercaria and adults. Ann l”Institut Pasteur (1965) 109(5):798–810.
28. Yoshino TP, Bayne CJ. Mimicry of snail host antigens by miracidia and primary sporocysts of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol (1983) 5(3):317–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1983.tb00747.x
29. Yoshino TP, Cheng TC. Snail Host-Like Antigens Associated with the Surface Membranes of Schistosoma mansoni Miracidia. J Parasitol (1978) 64(4):752–4. doi: 10.2307/3279977
30. Bayne CJ, Stephens JA. Schistosoma mansoni and Biomphalaria glabrata share epitopes: Antibodies to sporocysts bind host snail hemocytes. J Invertebr Pathol (1983) 42(2):221–3. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(83)90064-2
31. Bayne CJ, Boswell CA, Yui MA. Widespread antigenic cross-reactivity between plasma proteins of a gastropod, and its trematode parasite. Dev Comp Immunol (1987) 11(2):321–9. doi: 10.1016/0145-305X(87)90076-0
32. Lehr T, Beuerlein K, Doenhoff MJ, Grevelding CG, Geyer R. Localization of carbohydrate determinants common to Biomphalaria glabrata as well as to sporocysts and miracidia of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology (2008) 135(8):931–42. doi: 10.1017/S0031182008004514
33. Peterson NA, Hokke CH, Deelder AM, Yoshino TP. Glycotope analysis in miracidia and primary sporocysts of Schistosoma mansoni: Differential expression during the miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation. Int J Parasitol (2009) 39(12):1331–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.06.002
34. El-Ansary A. Biochemical and immunological adaptation in schistosome parasitism. Comp Biochem Physiol - B Biochem Mol Biol (2003) 136(2):227–43. doi: 10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00124-6
35. Lehr T, Frank S, Natsuka S, Geyer H, Beuerlein K, Doenhoff MJ, et al. N-Glycosylation patterns of hemolymph glycoproteins from Biomphalaria glabrata strains expressing different susceptibility to Schistosoma mansoni infection. Exp Parasitol (2010) 126(4):592–602. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.06.031
36. Yoshino TP, Wu XJ, Gonzalez LA, Hokke CH. Circulating Biomphalaria glabrata hemocyte subpopulations possess shared schistosome glycans and receptors capable of binding larval glycoconjugates. Exp Parasitol (2013) 133(1):28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.10.002
37. Yoshino TP, Wu XJ, Liu H, Gonzalez LA, Deelder AM, Hokke CH. Glycotope sharing between snail hemolymph and larval schistosomes: Larval transformation products alter shared glycan patterns of plasma proteins. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2012) 6(3):e1569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001569
38. Duvaux-Miret O, Stefanot GB, Smiths EM, Dissous C, Capron A. Immunosuppression in the definitive and intermediate hosts of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni by release of immunoactive neuropeptides (neuroimmunomodulation/conformational changes/neutral endopeptidase/parasite neuropeptides/host-parasite i. Proc Natl Acad Sci (1992) 89(2):778–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.778
39. Roger E, Mitta G, Moné Y, Bouchut A, Rognon A, Grunau C, et al. Molecular determinants of compatibility polymorphism in the Biomphalaria glabrata/Schistosoma mansoni model: New candidates identified by a global comparative proteomics approach. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2008) 157(2):205–16. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.11.003
40. Gourbal B, Théron A, Grunau C, Duval D, Mitta G. Polymorphic mucin-like proteins in Schistosoma mansoni, a variable antigen and a key component of the compatibility between the schistosome and its snail host. Results Probl Cell Differ (2015) 57:91–108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20819-0_4
41. Roger E, Gourbal B, Grunau C, Pierce RJ, Galinier R, Mitta G. Expression analysis of highly polymorphic mucin proteins (Sm PoMuc) from the parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2008) 157(2):217–27. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.11.015
42. Roger E, Grunau C, Pierce RJ, Hirai H, Gourbal B, Galinier R, et al. Controlled chaos of polymorphic mucins in a metazoan parasite (Schistosoma mansoni) interacting with its invertebrate host (Biomphalaria glabrata). PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2008) 2(11):e330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000330
43. Mitta G, Adema CM, Gourbal B, Loker ES, Theron A. Compatibility polymorphism in snail/schistosome interactions: From field to theory to molecular mechanisms. Dev Comp Immunol (2012) 37(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.09.002
44. Perrin C, Lepesant JMJ, Roger E, Duval D, Fneich S, Thuillier V, et al. Schistosoma mansoni Mucin Gene (SmPoMuc) Expression: Epigenetic Control to Shape Adaptation to a New Host. PLoS Pathog (2013) 9(8):e1003571. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003571
45. Dresden MH, Sung CK, Deelder AM. A monoclonal antibody from infected mice to a Schistosoma mansoni egg proteinase. J Immunol (1983) 130(1):1–3.
46. Yoshino TP, Lodes MJ, Rege AA, Chappell CL. Proteinase Activity in Miracidia, Transformation Excretory-Secretory Products, and Primary Sporocysts of Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol (1993) 79(1):23. doi: 10.2307/3283272
47. Wu X-J, Sabat G, Brown JF, Zhang M, Taft A, Peterson N, et al. Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni proteins released during in vitro miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2009) 164:32–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.11.005
48. Yoshino TP, Brown M, Wu XJ, Jackson CJ, Ocadiz-Ruiz R, Chalmers IW, et al. Excreted/secreted Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen-like 9 (SmVAL9) modulates host extracellular matrix remodelling gene expression. Int J Parasitol (2014) 44(8):551–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.04.002
49. Lodes MJ, Yoshino TP. Characterization of Excretory-Secretory Proteins Synthesized In vitro by Schistosoma mansoni Primary Sporocysts. J Parasitol (1989) 75(6):853. doi: 10.2307/3282863
50. Vermeire JJ, Taft AS, Hoffmann KF, Fitzpatrick JM, Yoshino TP. Schistosoma mansoni: DNA microarray gene expression profiling during the miracidium-to-mother sporocyst transformation. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2006) 147(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.01.006
51. Taft AS, Vermeire JJ, Bernier J, Birkeland SR, Cipriano MJ, Papa AR, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Schistosoma mansoni larval development using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Parasitology (2009) 136(5):469–85. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009005733
52. Yoshino TP, Lodes MJ. Secretory Protein Biosynthesis in Snail Hemocytes: In vitro Modulation by Larval Schistosome Excretory-Secretory Products. J Parasitol (1988) 74(4):538. doi: 10.2307/3282169
53. Zahoor Z, Davies AJ, Kirk RS, Rollinson D, Walker AJ. Larval excretory-secretory products from the parasite Schistosoma mansoni modulate HSP70 protein expression in defence cells of its snail host, Biomphalaria glabrata. Cell Stress Chaperones (2010) 15(5):639–50. doi: 10.1007/s12192-010-0176-z
54. Mager WH, De Kruijff AJJ. Stress-induced transcriptional activation. Microbiol Rev (1995) 59(3):506–31. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.59.3.506-531.1995
55. Hambrook JR, Kaboré AL, Pila EA, Hanington PC. A metalloprotease produced by larval Schistosoma mansoni facilitates infection establishment and maintenance in the snail host by interfering with immune cell function. Jolly ER, editor. PLoS Pathogs (2018) 14(10):e1007393. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007393
56. Lodes MJ, Yoshino’ TP. The Effect of Schistosome Excretory-Secretory Products on Biomphalaria glabrata Hemocyte Motility. J Invertebr Pathol (1990) 56(1):75–85. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90147-x
57. Fryer SE, Bayne CJ. Schistosoma mansoni Modulation of Phagocytosis in Biomphalaria glabrata. J Parasitol (1990) 76(1):45. doi: 10.2307/3282626
58. Connors VA, Lodes MJ, Yoshino TP. Identification of a Schistosoma mansoni sporocyst excretory-secretory antioxidant molecule and its effect on superoxide production by Biomphalaria glabrata hemocytes. J Invertebr Pathol (1991) 58(3):387–95. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(91)90185-S
59. Dinguirard N, Cavalcanti MGS, Wu XJ, Bickham-Wright U, Sabat G, Yoshino TP. Proteomic analysis of Biomphalaria glabrata hemocytes during in vitroencapsulation of Schistosoma mansoni sporocysts. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2773. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02773
60. Olivier M, Atayde VD, Isnard A, Hassani K, Shio MT. Leishmania virulence factors: focus on the metalloprotease GP63. Microbes Infect (2012) 14:1377–89. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.05.014
61. Catalano S, Sène M, Diouf ND, Fall CB, Borlase A, Léger E, et al. Rodents as natural hosts of zoonotic schistosoma species and hybrids: An epidemiological and evolutionary perspective from West Africa. J Infect Dis (2018) 218(3):429–33. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy029
62. Lu DB, Rudge JW, Wang TP, Donnelly CA, Fang GR, Webster JP. Transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in Marshland and hilly regions of China: Parasite population genetic and sibship structure. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2010) 4(8):781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000781
63. Colley DG, Secor WE. Immunology of human schistosomiasis. Parasite Immunol (2014) 36(8):347–57. doi: 10.1111/pim.12087
64. Moqbel R, Macdonald AJ, Kay AB. Enhancement of human eosinophil- and neutrophil-mediated killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni by reversed type (IgE-mediated) anaphylaxis, in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol (1985) 59(3):577–84.
65. McKean JR, Anwar ARE, Kay AB. Schistosoma mansoni: Complement and antibody damage, mediated by human eosinophils and neutrophils, in killing schistosomula in vitro. Exp Parasitol (1981) 51(3):307–17. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(81)90118-1
66. Ndhlovu P, Cadman H, Vennervald BJ, Christensen NO, Chidimu M, Chandiwana SK. Age-related antibody profiles in Schistosoma haematobium infections in a rural community in Zimbabwe. Parasite Immunol (1996) 18(4):181–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1996.d01-78.x
67. Fulford AJC, Webster M, Ouma JH, Kimani G, Dunne DW, Fulford T. Puberty and age-related changes in susceptibility to schistosome infection. Parasitol Today (1998) 14(1):23–6. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01168-X
68. Webster M, Libranda-Ramirez BDL, Aligui GD, Olveda RM, Ouma JH, Kariuki HC, et al. The influence of sex and age on antibody isotype responses to Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum in human populations in Kenya and the Philippines. Parasitology (1997) 114(4):383–93. doi: 10.1017/S003118209600858X
69. Naus CWA, Booth M, Jones FM, Kemijumbi J, Vennervald BJ, Kariuki CH, et al. The relationship between age, sex, egg-count and specific antibody responses against Schistosoma mansoni antigens in a Ugandan fishing community. Trop Med Int Heal (2003) 8(6):561–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01056.x
70. Mitchell KM, Mutapi F, Savill NJ, Woolhouse MEJ. Protective immunity to Schistosoma haematobium infection is primarily an anti-fecundity response stimulated by the death of adult worms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109(33):13347–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121051109
71. Di Bella S, Riccardi N, Giacobbe DR, Luzzati R. History of schistosomiasis (bilharziasis) in humans: from Egyptian medical papyri to molecular biology on mummies. Pathog Glob Health (2018) 112(5):268–73. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1495357
72. Yousef H, Sharma S. Anatomy, Skin (Integument), Epidermis. StatPearls: StatPearls Publishing (2018).
73. Curwen RS, Wilson RA. Invasion of skin by schistosome cercariae: Some neglected facts. Trends Parasitol (2003) 19(2):63–6. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00019-3
74. Breitkreutz D, Koxholt I, Thiemann K, Nischt R. Skin basement membrane: The foundation of epidermal integrity - BM functions and diverse roles of bridging molecules nidogen and perlecan. BioMed Res Int (2013) 2013:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2013/179784
75. Crabtree JE, Wilson RA. Schistosoma Mansoni: An Ultrastructural Examination Of Pulmonary Migration. Parasitology (1986) 92(2):343–54. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000064118
76. Bartlett A, Brown M, Marriott C, Whitfield PJ. The infection of human skin by schistosome cercariae: studies using Franz cells. Parasitology (2000) 1121:49–54. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099006034
77. He YX, Chen L, Ramaswamy K. Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium, and S. japonicum: Early events associated with penetration and migration of schistosomula through human skin. Exp Parasitol (2002) 102(2):99–108. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4894(03)00024-9
78. Whitfield PJ, Bartlett A, Brown MB, Marriott C. Invasion by schistosome cercariae: Studies with human skin explants. Trends Parasitol (2003) 19(8):339–40. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00143-0
79. Ruppel A, Chlichlia K, Bahgat M. Invasion by schistosome cercariae: Neglected aspects in Schistosoma japonicum. Trends Parasitol (2004) 20(9):397–400. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.06.006
80. McKerrow JJ. Invasion of skin by schistosome cercariae: Some neglected facts - Response from James J. McKerrow. Trends Parasitol (2003) 19(2):66–8. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00018-1
81. Fishelson Z, Amiri P, Friend DS, Marikovsky M, Petitt M, Newport G, et al. Schistosoma mansoni: Cell-specific expression and secretion of a serine protease during development of cercariae. Exp Parasitol (1992) 75(1):87–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(92)90124-S
82. McKerrow JH, Keene WE, Jeong KH, Werb Z. Degradation of extracellular matrix by larvae of Schistosoma mansoni. I. Degradation by cercariae as a model for initial parasite invasion of host. Lab Invest (1983) 49(2):195–200.
83. Portnoy M, Higashi GI, Kamal KA. Percutaneous Infection by Schistosoma mansoni “Tailless” Cercariae. J Parasitol (1983) 69(6):1162. doi: 10.2307/3280886
84. McKerrow JH, Salter J. Invasion of skin by Schistosoma cercariae. Trends Parasitol (2002) 18(5):193–5. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02309-7
85. Marikovsky M, Fishelson Z, Arnon R. Purification and characterization of proteases secreted by transforming schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol (1988) 30(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(88)90131-4
86. Chavez-Olortegu C, Tavares CAP, Resende M. Purification and characterization of a 47 kDa protease from Schistosoma mansoni cerearial secretion. Parasitology (1992) 105(2):211–8. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000074138
87. Newport GR, McKerrow JH, Hedstrom R, Petitt M, McGarrigle L, Barr PJ, et al. Cloning of the proteinase that facilitates infection by schistosome parasites. J Biol Chem (1988) 263(26):13179–84. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)37688-9
88. Lim KC, Sun E, Bahgat M, Bucks D, Richard G, Hinz RS, et al. Blockage of skin invasion by schistosome cercariae by serine protease inhibitors. Am J Trop Med Hyg (1999) 60(3):487–92. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.487
89. Curwen RS, Ashton PD, Sundaralingam S, Wilson RA. Identification of Novel Proteases and Immunomodulators in the Secretions of Schistosome Cercariae That Facilitate Host Entry. Mol Cell Proteomics (2006) 5(5):835–44. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500313-MCP200
90. Salter JP, Lim KC, Hansell E, Hsieh I, McKerrow JH. Schistosome invasion of human skin and degradation of dermal elastin are mediated by a single serine protease. J Biol Chem (2000) 275(49):38667–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006997200
91. Ghendler Y, Parizade M, Arnon R, McKerrow JH, Fishelson Z. Schistosoma mansoni: Evidence for a 28-kDa membrane-anchored protease on schistosomula. Exp Parasitol (1996) 83(1):73–82. doi: 10.1006/expr.1996.0051
92. Dvořák J, Mashiyama ST, Braschi S, Sajid M, Knudsen GM, Hansell E, et al. Differential use of protease families for invasion by schistosome cercariae. Biochimie (2008) 90(2):345–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.08.013
93. Liu M, Ju C, Du XF, Shen HM, Wang JP, Li J, et al. Proteomic analysis on cercariae and schistosomula in reference to potential proteases involved in host invasion of Schistosoma japonicum larvae. J Proteome Res (2015) 14(11):4623–34. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00465
94. Dalton JP, Clough KA, Jones MK, Brindley PJ. The cysteine proteinases of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Parasitology (1997) 114(2):105–12. doi: 10.1017/S003118209600830X
95. Bourke CD, Prendergast CT, Sanin DE, Oulton TE, Hall RJ, Mountford AP. Epidermal keratinocytes initiate wound healing and pro-inflammatory immune responses following percutaneous schistosome infection. Int J Parasitol (2015) 45(4):215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.11.002
96. Paveley RA, Aynsley SA, Cook PC, Turner JD, Mountford AP. Fluorescent imaging of antigen released by a skin-invading helminth reveals differential uptake and activation profiles by antigen presenting cells. Jones MK, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2009) 3(10):e528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000528
97. Ramaswamy K, Potluri S, Ramaswamy P, Ebbing A, He Y, Kumar P, et al. Immune evasion by Schistosoma mansoni: characterization of Sm16.8 an anti-inflammatory protein produced by the skin stage schistosomulum. Proc 9th Int Conf Parasito (1998) 597–603.
98. Ramaswamy K, Salafsky B, Lykken M, Shibuya T. Modulation of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta and IL-1RA production in human keratinocytes by schistosomulae of Schistosoma mansoni. Immunol Infect Dis (1995) 5(2):100–7.
99. Bránnström K, Sellin ME, Holmfeldt P, Brattsand M, Gullberg M. The Schistosoma mansoni protein Sm16/SmSLP/SmSPO-1 assembles into a nine-subunit oligomer with potential to inhibit toll-like receptor signaling. Infect Immun (2009) 77(3):1144–54. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01126-08
100. Sanin DE, Mountford AP. Sm16, a major component of Schistosoma mansoni cercarial excretory/secretory products, prevents macrophage classical activation and delays antigen processing. Parasites Vectors (2015) 8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0608-1
101. Hu S, Wu Z, Yang L, Fung MC. Molecular cloning and expression of a functional anti-inflammatory protein, Sj16, of Schistosoma japonicum. Int J Parasitol (2009) 39(2):191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.017
102. Sun XJ, Li R, Sun X, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu XJ, et al. Unique roles of Schistosoma japonicum protein Sj16 to induce IFN-γ and IL-10 producing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. Parasite Immunol (2012) 34(8–9):430–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2012.01377.x
103. Holmfeldt P, Brännström K, Sellin ME, Segerman B, Carlsson SR, Gullberg M. The Schistosoma mansoni protein Sm16/SmSLP/SmSPO-1 is a membrane-binding protein that lacks the proposed microtubule-regulatory activity. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2007) 156(2):225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.08.006
104. Bernardes WPDOS, De Araújo JM, Carvalho GB, Alves CC, De Moura Coelho AT, Dutra ITS, et al. Sm16, A Schistosoma mansoni Immunomodulatory Protein, Fails to Elicit a Protective Immune Response and Does Not Have an Essential Role in Parasite Survival in the Definitive Host. J Immunol Res (2019) 2019:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2019/6793596
105. Crosnier C, Hokke CH, Protasio AV, Brandt C, Rinaldi G, Langenberg MCC, et al. Screening of a Library of Recombinant Schistosoma mansoni Proteins With Sera From Murine and Human Controlled Infections Identifies Early Serological Markers. J Infect Dis (2020) 1–12. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa329
106. Chen L, Rao KVN, He YX, Ramaswamy K. Skin-stage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni produce an apoptosis-inducing factor that can cause apoptosis of T cells. J Biol Chem (2002) 277(37):34329–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201344200
107. Kumar P, Ramaswamy K. Vaccination with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni preferentially induced the accumulation of interferon-γ producing T cells in the skin and skin draining lymph nodes of mice. Parasitol Int (1999) 48(2):109–19. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5769(99)00008-2
108. Ramaswamy K, Kumar P, He Y-X. A Role for Parasite-Induced PGE 2 in IL-10-Mediated Host Immunoregulation by Skin Stage Schistosomula of Schistosoma MansoniJ Immunol (2000) 165(8):4567–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4567
109. Hervé M, Angeli V, Pinzar E, Wintjens R, Faveeuw C, Narumiya S, et al. Pivotal roles of the parasite PGD2 synthase and of the host D prostanoid receptor 1 in schistosome immune evasion. Eur J Immunol (2003) 33(10):2764–72. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324143
110. Grezel D, Capron M, Grzych J -M, Fontaine J, Lecocq J -P, Capron A. Protective immunity induced in rat schistosomiasis by a single dose of the Sm28GST recombinant antigen: Effector mechanisms involving IgE and IgA antibodies. Eur J Immunol (1993) 23(2):454–60. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230223
111. Dupré L, Hervé M, Schacht AM, Capron A, Riveau G. Control of schistosomiasis pathology by combination of Sm28GST DNA immunization and praziquantel treatment. J Infect Dis (1999) 180(2):454–63. doi: 10.1086/314875
112. Boulanger D, Reid GDF, Sturrock RF, Wolowczuk I, Balloul JM, Grezel D, et al. Immunization of mice and baboons with the recombinant Sm28GST affects both worm viability and fecundity after experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol (1991) 13(5):473–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1991.tb00545.x
113. Riveau G, Schacht AM, Dompnier JP, Deplanque D, Seck M, Waucquier N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the rSh28GST urinary schistosomiasis vaccine: A phase 3 randomized, controlled trial in Senegalese children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2018) 12(12):e0006968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006968
114. Berriman M, Haas BJ, Loverde PT, Wilson RA, Dillon GP, Cerqueira GC, et al. The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Nature (2009) 460(7253):352–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08160
115. Fernandes RS, Barbosa TC, Barbosa MMF, Miyasato PA, Nakano E, Leite LCC, et al. Stage and tissue expression patterns of Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen-like proteins SmVAL 4, 13, 16 and 24. Parasites Vectors (2017) 10(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2144-2
116. Kelleher A, Darwiche R, Rezende WC, Farias LP, Leite LCC, Schneiter R, et al. Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen-like protein 4 (SmVAL4) is a novel lipid-binding SCP/TAPS protein that lacks the prototypical CAP motifs. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr (2015) 71(8):1022. doi: 10.1107/S1399004715003132
117. Fernandes RS, Fernandes LGV, de Godoy AS, Miyasato PA, Nakano E, Farias LP, et al. Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen-like protein 18 (SmVAL18) is a plasminogen-binding protein secreted during the early stages of mammalian-host infection. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2018) 221:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2018.02.003
118. Chen J, Hu X, He S, Wang L, Hu D, Wang X, et al. Expression and immune response analysis of Schistosoma japonicum VAL-1, a homologue of vespid venom allergens. Parasitol Res (2010) 106(6):1413–8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1817-y
119. Parker-Manuel SJ, Ivens AC, Dillon GP, Wilson RA. Gene expression patterns in larval Schistosoma mansoni associated with infection of the mammalian host.s. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2011) 5(8):e1274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001274
120. Marikovsky M, Levi-Schaffer F, Arnon R, Fishelson Z. Schistosoma mansoni: Killing of transformed schistosomula by the alternative pathway of human complement. Exp Parasitol (1986) 61(1):86–94. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(86)90138-4
121. Hockley DJ, McLaren DJ. Schistosoma mansoni: Changes in the outer membrane of the tegument during development from cercaria to adult worm. Int J Parasitol (1973) 3(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(73)90004-0
122. Deng J, Gold D, LoVerde PT, Fishelson Z. Inhibition of the Complement Membrane Attack Complex by Schistosoma mansoni Paramyosin. Infect Immun (2003) 71(11):6402–10. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6402-6410.2003
123. Torpier G, Capron A, Ouaissi MA. Receptor for IgG(Fc) and human β2-microglobulin on S. mansoni schistosomula [8]. Nature (1979) 278(5703):447–9. doi: 10.1038/278447a0
124. Auriault C, Ouaissi MA, Torpier G, Eisen H, Capron A. Proteolytic cleavage of IgG bound to the Fc receptor of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. Parasite Immunol (1981) 3(1):33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1981.tb00383.x
125. Pleass RJ, Kusel JR, Woof JM. Cleavage of human IgE mediated by Schistosoma mansoni. Int Arch Allergy Immunol (2000) 121(3):194–204. doi: 10.1159/000024317
126. Chai M, McManus DP, McInnes R, Moertel L, Tran M, Loukas A, et al. Transcriptome profiling of lung schistosomula,in vitro cultured schistosomula and adult Schistosoma japonicum. Cell Mol Life Sci (2006) 63(7–8):919–29. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5578-1
127. Coulson PS. The radiation-attenuated vaccine against schistosomes in animal models: Paradigm for a human vaccine? Adv Parasitol (1997) 39:271–336. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60048-2
128. El Ridi R, Tallima H, Mahana N, Dalton JP. Innate immunogenicity and in vitro protective potential of Schistosoma mansoni lung schistosomula excretory-secretory candidate vaccine antigens. Microbes Infect (2010) 12(10):700–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.04.012
129. Wynn TA, Oswald IP, Eltoum IA, Caspar P, Lowenstein CJ, Lewis FA, et al. Elevated expression of Th1 cytokines and nitric oxide synthase in the lungs of vaccinated mice after challenge infection with Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol (1994) 153(11):5200–9.
130. Dillon GP, Feltwell T, Skelton JP, Ashton PD, Coulson PS, Quail MA, et al. Microarray analysis identifies genes preferentially expressed in the lung schistosomulum of Schistosoma mansoni. Int J Parasitol (2006) 36(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.10.008
131. Farias LP, Tararam CA, Miyasato PA, Nishiyama MY, Oliveira KC, Kawano T, et al. Screening the Schistosoma mansoni transcriptome for genes differentially expressed in the schistosomulum stage in search for vaccine candidates. Parasitol Res (2011) 108(1):123–35. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2045-1
132. Lorenzo C, Salinas G, Brugnini A, Wernstedt C, Hellman U, González-Sapienza G. Echinococcus granulosus antigen 5 is closely related to proteases of the trypsin family. Biochem J (2003) 369(1):191–8. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021402
133. Gobert GN, Chai M, McManus DP. Biology of the schistosome lung-stage schistosomulum. Parasitology (2007) 134(4):453–60. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006001648
134. Fouad Ahmed S, Oswald IP, Caspar P, Hieny S, Keefer L, Sher A, et al. Developmental differences determine larval susceptibility to nitric oxide-mediated killing in a murine model of vaccination against Schistosoma mansoni. Infect Immun (1997) 65(1):219–26. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.219-226.1997
135. Shen J, Lai DH, Wilson RA, Chen YF, Wang LF, Yu ZL, et al. Nitric oxide blocks the development of the human parasite Schistosoma japonicum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2017) 114(38):10214–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708578114
136. Kumagai T, Osada Y, Ohta N, Kanazawa T. Peroxiredoxin-1 from Schistosoma japonicum functions as a scavenger against hydrogen peroxide but not nitric oxide. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2009) 164(1):26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.11.002
137. Figueiredo BC, Da’dara AA, Oliveira SC, Skelly PJ. Schistosomes Enhance Plasminogen Activation: The Role of Tegumental Enolase. Davies SJ, editor. PLoS Pathog (2015) 11(12):e1005335. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005335
138. Yang J, Qiu C, Xia Y, Yao L, Fu Z, Yuan C, et al. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of Schistosoma japonicum enolase which is highly expressed at the schistosomulum stage. Parasitol Res (2010) 107(3):667–77. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1913-z
139. Smithers SR, Terry RJ, Hockley DJ. Host antigens in schistosomiasis. Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci (1969) 171(25):483–94. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0007
140. Tarleton RL, Kemp WM. Demonstration of IgG-Fc and C3 receptors on adult Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol (1981) 126(1):379–94.
141. Loukas A, Jones MK, King LT, Brindley PJ, McManus DP. Receptor for Fc on the surfaces of schistosomes. Infect Immun (2001) 69(6):3646–51. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3646-3651.2001
142. Castro-Borges W, Dowle A, Curwen RS, Thomas-Oates J, Wilson RA. Enzymatic shaving of the tegument surface of live schistosomes for proteomic analysis: A rational approach to select vaccine candidates. Mulvenna J, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2011) 5(3):e993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000993
143. Duvaux-Miret O, Stefano GB, Smith EM, Dissous C, Capron A. Immunosuppression in the definitive and intermediate hosts of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni by release of immunoactive neuropeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1992) 89(2):778–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.778
144. Salzet M, Capron A, Stefano GB. Molecular crosstalk in host-parasite relationships: Schistosome- and leech-host interactions. Parasitol Today (2000) 16(12):536–40. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01787-7
145. Leung MK, Dissous C, Capron A, Woldegaber H, Duvaux-Miret O, Stefano GB. Schistosoma mansoni: The presence and potential use of opiate-like substances. Exp Parasitol (1995) 81(2):208–15. doi: 10.1006/expr.1995.1110
146. Cao X, Fu Z, Zhang M, Han Y, Han Q, Lu K, et al. Excretory/secretory proteome of 14-day schistosomula, Schistosoma japonicum. J Proteomics (2016) 130:221–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.001
147. Collins JJ, Wendt GR, Iyer H, Newmark PA. Stem cell progeny contribute to the schistosome host-parasite interface. Elife (2016) 5:e12473. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12473
148. Wilson RA. Proteomics at the schistosome-mammalian host interface: Any prospects for diagnostics or vaccines? Parasitology (2012) 139(9):1178–94. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000339
149. Skelly PJ, Alan Wilson R. Making Sense of the Schistosome Surface. Adv Parasitol (2006) 63:185–284. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(06)63003-0
150. Ma S, Zai J, Han Y, Hong Y, Zhang M, Cao X, et al. Characterization of Schistosoma japonicum tetraspanning orphan receptor and its role in binding to complement C2 and immunoprotection against murine schistosomiasis. Parasites Vectors (2017) 10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2229-y
151. Smith D, Cwiklinski K, Jewhurst H, Tikhonova IG, Dalton JP. An atypical and functionally diverse family of Kunitz-type cysteine/serine proteinase inhibitors secreted by the helminth parasite Fasciola hepatica. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):20657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77687-7
152. Ranasinghe SL, Fischer K, Gobert GN, McManus DP. Functional expression of a novel Kunitz type protease inhibitor from the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Parasites Vectors (2015) 8(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1022-z
153. Morais SB, Figueiredo BC, Assis NRG, Alvarenga DM, de Magalhães MTQ, Ferreira RS, et al. Schistosoma mansoni SmKI-1 serine protease inhibitor binds to elastase and impairs neutrophil function and inflammation. Gause WC, editor. PLoS Pathog (2018) 14(2):e1006870. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006870
154. Alves C LS, Santiago L F, Santana M BR, Figueiredo B CP, Morais S B, Oliveira S C, et al. Immunomodulatory properties of Schistosoma mansoni proteins Sm200 and SmKI-1 in vitro and in a murine model of allergy to the mite Blomia tropicalis. Mol Immunol (2020) 124:91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.05.011
155. Chen L, He B, Hou W, He L. Cysteine protease inhibitor of Schistosoma japonicum - A parasite-derived negative immunoregulatory factor. Parasitol Res (2017) 116(3):901–8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5363-0
156. Wang L, Li Z, Shen J, Liu Z, Liang J, Wu X, et al. Exosome-like vesicles derived by Schistosoma japonicum adult worms mediates M1 type immune- activity of macrophage. Parasitol Res (2015) 114(5):1865–73. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4373-7
157. Samoil V, Dagenais M, Ganapathy V, Aldridge J, Glebov A, Jardim A, et al. Vesicle-based secretion in schistosomes: Analysis of protein and microRNA (miRNA) content of exosome-like vesicles derived from Schistosoma mansoni. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21587-4
158. Zhu L, Liu J, Dao J, Lu K, Li H, Gu H, et al. Molecular characterization of S. japonicum exosome-like vesicles reveals their regulatory roles in parasite-host interactions. Sci Rep (2016) 6:1–14. doi: 10.1038/srep25885
159. Morris GP, Threadgold LT. Ultrastructure of the tegument of adult Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol (1968) 54(1):15–27. doi: 10.2307/3276867
160. Wilson RA, Barnes PE. The tegument of Schistosoma mansoni: Observations on the formation, structure and composition of cytoplasmic inclusions in relation to tegument function. Parasitology (1974) 68(2):239–58. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000045765
161. Da’dara AA, de Laforcade AM, Skelly PJ. The impact of schistosomes and schistosomiasis on murine blood coagulation and fibrinolysis as determined by thromboelastography (TEG). J Thromb Thrombolysis (2016) 41(4):671–7. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1298-z
162. Lin YL, He S. Sm22.6 antigen is an inhibitor to human thrombin. Mol Biochem Parasitol (2006) 147(1):95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.01.012
163. Wang Q, Da’dara AA, Skelly PJ. The human blood parasite Schistosoma mansoni expresses extracellular tegumental calpains that cleave the blood clotting protein fibronectin. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13141-5
164. Da’dara AA, Bhardwaj R, Ali YBM, Skelly PJ. Schistosome tegumental ecto-apyrase (SmATPDase1) degrades exogenous pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic nucleotides. PeerJ (2014) 2014(1):e316. doi: 10.7717/peerj.316
165. Leontovyč A, Ulrychová L, O’Donoghue AJ, Vondrášek J, Marešová L, Hubálek M, et al. SmSP2: A serine protease secreted by the blood fluke pathogen Schistosoma mansoni with anti-hemostatic properties. Greenberg RM, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2018) 12(4):e0006446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006446
166. Da’Dara AA, Skelly PJ. Schistosomes versus platelets. Thromb Res (2014) 134(6):1176–81. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.09.032
167. Verity CK, Loukas A, Mcmanus DP, Brindley PJ. Schistosoma japonicum cathepsin D aspartic protease cleaves human IgG and other serum components. Parasitology (2001) 122(4):415–21. doi: 10.1017/S0031182001007521
168. Orcia D, Zeraik AE, Lopes JLS, Macedo JNA, dos Santos CR, Oliveira KC, et al. Interaction of an esophageal MEG protein from schistosomes with a human S100 protein involved in inflammatory response. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj (2017) 1861(1):3490–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.09.015
169. Donato R R, Cannon B, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Hsu K, Weber D J, et al. Functions of S100 Proteins. Curr Mol Med (2012) 13(1):24–57. doi: 10.2174/156652413804486214
170. Truscott M, Evans DA, Gunn M, Hoffmann KF. Schistosoma mansoni hemozoin modulates alternative activation of macrophages via specific suppression of Retnla expression and secretion. Infect Immun (2013) 81(1):133–42. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00701-12
171. Costain AH, MacDonald AS, Smits HH. Schistosome Egg Migration: Mechanisms, Pathogenesis and Host Immune Responses. Front Immunol (2018) 9:3042. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03042
172. Schwartz C, Fallon PG. Schistosoma “Eggs-iting” the host: Granuloma formation and egg excretion. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2492. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02492
173. Wilson RA. Virulence factors of schistosomes. Microbes Infect (2012) 14(15):1442–50. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.09.001
174. Ashton PD, Harrop R, Shah B, Wilson RA. The schistosome egg: Development and secretions. Parasitology (2001) 122(3):329–38. doi: 10.1017/S0031182001007351
175. Cheever AW, Macedonia JG, Mosimann JE, Cheever EA. Kinetics of egg production and egg excretion by Schistosoma mansoni and S. japonicum in mice infected with a single pair of worms. Am J Trop Med Hyg (1994) 50(3):281–95. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.281
176. Vella AT, Hulsebosch MD, Pearce EJ. Schistosoma mansoni eggs induce antigen-responsive CD44-hi T helper 2 cells and IL-4-secreting CD44-lo cells. Potential for T helper 2 subset differentiation is evident at the precursor level. J Immunol (1992) 149(5):1714–22.
177. Hoffmann KF, Cheever AW, Wynn TA. IL-10 and the Dangers of Immune Polarization: Excessive Type 1 and Type 2 Cytokine Responses Induce Distinct Forms of Lethal Immunopathology in Murine Schistosomiasis. J Immunol (2000) 164(12):6406–16. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6406
178. Fallon PG, Richardson EJ, McKenzie GJ, McKenzie ANJ. Schistosome Infection of Transgenic Mice Defines Distinct and Contrasting Pathogenic Roles for IL-4 and IL-13: IL-13 Is a Profibrotic Agent. J Immunol (2000) 164(5):2585–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.5.2585
179. Schramm G, Mohrs K, Wodrich M, Doenhoff MJ, Pearce EJ, Haas H, et al. Cutting Edge: IPSE/alpha-1, a Glycoprotein from Schistosoma mansoni Eggs, Induces IgE-Dependent, Antigen-Independent IL-4 Production by Murine Basophils In Vivo. J Immunol (2014) 178(10):6023–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6023
180. Haeberlein S, Obieglo K, Ozir-Fazalalikhan A, Chayé MAM, Veninga H, van der Vlugt LEPM, et al. Schistosome egg antigens, including the glycoprotein IPSE/alpha-1, trigger the development of regulatory B cells. Mitre E, editor. PLoS Pathog (2017) 13(7):e1006539. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006539
181. Everts B, Perona-Wright G, Smits HH, Hokke CH, Van Der Ham AJ, Fitzsimmons CM, et al. Omega-1, a glycoprotein secreted by Schistosoma mansoni eggs, drives Th2 responses. J Exp Med (2009) 206(8):1673–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082460
182. Steinfelder S, Andersen JF, Cannons JL, Feng CG, Joshi M, Dwyer D, et al. The major component in schistosome eggs responsible for conditioning dendritic cells for Th2 polarization is a T2 ribonuclease (omega-1). J Exp Med (2009) 206(8):1681–90. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082462
183. Everts B, Hussaarts L, Driessen NN, Meevissen MHJ, Schramm G, van der Ham AJ, et al. Schistosome-derived omega-1 drives Th2 polarization by suppressing protein synthesis following internalization by the mannose receptor. J Exp Med (2012) 209(10):1753–67. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111381
184. Ittiprasert W, Mann VH, Karinshak SE, Coghlan A, Rinaldi G, Sankaranarayanan G, et al. Programmed genome editing of the omega-1 ribonuclease of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni. Elife (2019) 8:e41337. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41337
185. Smith P, Fallon RE, Mangan NE, Walsh CM, Saraiva M, Sayers JR, et al. Schistosoma mansoni secretes a chemokine binding protein with antiinflammatory activity. J Exp Med (2005) 202(10):1319–25. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050955
Keywords: schistosome, schistosomiasis, immune evasion, immunomodulation, Biomphalaria glabrata
Citation: Hambrook JR and Hanington PC (2021) Immune Evasion Strategies of Schistosomes. Front. Immunol. 11:624178. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.624178
Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 22 December 2020;
Published: 04 February 2021.
Edited by:
Marina Moraes Mourão, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), BrazilReviewed by:
Alan Wilson, University of York, United KingdomTimothy P. Yoshino, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Copyright © 2021 Hambrook and Hanington. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Patrick C. Hanington, cGNoMUB1YWxiZXJ0YS5jYQ==