Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 31 May 2019
Sec. Comparative Immunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Comparative Immunology of Marine Mammals View all 9 articles

Insights Into Cetacean Immunology: Do Ecological and Biological Factors Make the Difference?

  • 1Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • 2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy
  • 3Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related protein A (MICA) in fibroblast cell cultures of cetaceans (skin biopsies of free-ranging specimens and skin samples of freshly stranded cetaceans) by an immunofluorescence technique and to outline possible variations in MICA expression linked to different ecological and biological factors, while also investigating MICA expression after in vitro treatments with different contaminants. Free-ranging or stranded specimens of cetaceans were sampled in the Sea of Cortez (Mexico) (Balaenoptera edeni, Delphinus capensis, and Orcinus orca) and in the Mediterranean Sea (Balaenoptera physalus, Physeter macrocephalus, Tursiops truncatus, and Stenella coeruleoalba). Cell cultures were treated with an OC mixture, flame retardants, PAHs, MeHg, and BPA. The three species from the Sea of Cortez showed higher basal activity of MICA and lower levels of DDTs and PCBs than the Mediterranean species. A Pearson's linear coefficient equal to −0.45 also confirmed this tendency to have high levels of MICA and low total OC levels. Treatment of cultured fibroblasts with different contaminants mostly resulted in the upregulation of MICA protein expression by at least one treatment dose; downregulation was also found in some species or treatments. MICA alteration indicates a state of stress of the organism and a modification of the immune system's response and can be proposed as a non-invasive immunological marker that can be measured in skin biopsy samples, thus offering a good alternative to blood measurements.

Introduction

Studies on the immune system of cetaceans have followed one another over the years and focused on endpoints of innate and adaptive immunity, such as the evaluation of cellular and humoral immune responses (lymphocyte transformation assay, natural killer cell activity, phagocytotic activity, and respiratory burst humoral immune responses), insights into cytokines, and acute phase responses, immunophenotyping of cetacean lymphoid cells, morphology, and pathology of lymphoid organs, and immunotoxic effects of environmental contaminants (14). Almost all investigations have been conducted on blood or on cetaceans found freshly stranded. In bottlenose dolphin, the possibility exists to work on live specimens, not only with captive specimens but also with wild populations, whereas for other cetacean species, carrying out blood sampling is absolutely unthinkable if we exclude the specimens kept in captivity.

Having an in-depth knowledge not only on how the cetacean immune system is composed but also on how it is modulated in the natural environment according to biological and ecological factors, while also considering the effects deriving from environmental pollution, is important.

The information concerning “immunologic baseline data” in natural populations and the possible alterations and/or modulations linked to internal and external factors are lacking. Stranded organisms can have infections and/or suffer from other disease conditions so that the data found cannot always be considered as baseline. In most of the published studies, the immunotoxic effects of several contaminants or mixtures were investigated only in vitro.

In this context of objective limitations, only a few studies have provided information on possible diversity in the immune response, for example, between different species, or within the same species among populations living in different habitats. More information can be found in the literature regarding the differential responses to contaminants after in vitro leukocyte exposure.

An interesting study was conducted by Levin et al. (5), in which blood was sampled from belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) from the Mystic Aquarium (CT) and from bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the U.S. Bottlenose Dolphin Navy Marine Mammal Program (San Diego, CA). Leukocytes were isolated and treated with different coplanar and non-coplanar polychlorobyphenils (PCBs) in different combinations and in combination with tetrachlorodibenzo(P)dioxins (TCDDs). The results showed a significant reduction in the phagocytic capacity of neutrophils and monocytes in both species, with a markedly greater percentage effect in dolphins compared to belugas. The dolphins, moreover, showed a markedly lower percentage of neutrophils and monocytes even in the untreated samples compared to the belugas. Uncertainties remain regarding basic differences between the two species or differences related to the animals' environmental status (captive/non-captive).

A study by Fair et al. (6) found an upregulation of several blood immune system analytes in wild bottlenose dolphins in comparison with under human care dolphins, allowing to hypothesize that variation in environmental conditions (temperature, nutrition, veterinary care, and pathogen/contaminant exposure) can modulate immune responses.

In most cases, contaminants were found to act as immunosuppressors in cetaceans, although some immune responses were also found to be upregulated after in vitro exposure to contaminants.

Ritz and Streibig (7) calculated the adverse effects of different concentrations of PCBs, Hg, methylmercury (MeHg) and Cd on lymphocyte proliferation in belugas and bottlenose dolphins; belugas seem less sensitive to PCBs than bottlenose dolphins but more sensitive to Hg and Cd.

Further immunotoxicological studies on the bottlenose dolphin showed that the treatment concentrations considered environmentally realistic for Hg, Cd, and Pb produced a significant reduction in lymphocyte proliferation, whereas Hg, Al, and Cd treatment resulted in decreased lymphocyte phagocytosis. Chromium did not show any effects on any immune assay at the concentrations tested (8).

In a field study conducted by Schaefer et al. (9) in Tursiops truncatus from the coasts of Florida and South Carolina, an inverse relationship was found between the Hg concentrations in blood and skin and the absolute numbers of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and platelets.

Following bottlenose dolphin exposure to perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), Fair et al. (10) found statistically significant positive associations between these contaminants and several immunological parameters: absolute numbers of CD2+ T cells, CD4+ helper T cells, CD19+ immature B cells, CD21+ mature B cells, CD2/CD21 ratio, MHCII+ cells, B cell proliferation, serum IgG1, granulocytic, and monocytic phagocytosis. No effects were found on natural killer (NK) cell activity.

In the same species, treatments with coplanar non-ortho-PCB congeners and butyltins (TNT and DBT) significantly reduced the proliferation response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (11).

No effect was found on bottlenose dolphin natural killer (NK) cell activity and lymphocyte proliferation (T and B cell) after in vitro exposure of peripheral blood leukocytes to environmentally relevant perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOS) and a penta-PBDE mixture (DE-71) concentrations (12, 13).

As previously stated, we presently have a fairly complete picture of the immune system of cetaceans and its interactions with the main classes of contaminants; however, great limitations in the study of natural populations and the modulation of their immune systems persist and are derived essentially from the typology of sampling and related tests developed and applied to date, which include blood sampling and use of freshly stranded animals. In vitro experiments are very useful to understand the dynamics of the interaction(s) between contaminants and the immune system but cannot completely illustrate what happens in wild populations. In vitro tests, in fact, cannot describe the whole-organism level processes, such as cell interactions and messenger molecules or chemical exposure, absorption, metabolism, and excretion. An urgent need exists, consequently, to search for new non-invasive tests that use more easily sampled tissues such as skin biopsies, which can provide information comparable to those obtained from blood tests but can be applied to all free-ranging cetacean species and populations, allowing for a high number of samples to be analyzed.

In this paper, we propose the use of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I Chain-Related gene A (MICA) as a potential biomarker for the cetacean immune system. Information on Human MICA is available in the literature but nothing exists regarding its presence and behavior in cetaceans.

The Human MICA encodes for a 62-Kda cell surface glycoprotein, which is expressed on endothelial, dendritic and epithelial cells; as well as on fibroblasts; and on many neoplastic and virus–infected cells, serving as a target for cellular and humoral immune responses in transformed cells. The level of expression of MICA protein in epithelial tissues is normally low, but upregulation can occur due to several cellular stress stimuli, including heat shock proteins. MICA also functions as a ligand that is recognized by the activating receptor NKG2D, which is expressed on the surface of NK, NKT, CD8+, and TCRγδ+ T cells. Allelic variants of MICA can result in large differences in NKG2D binding. This differential affinity might affect NK cell activation thresholds and T cell modulation in autoimmune diseases and tumors (14, 15). Soluble forms of MICA molecules (sMICA) can also be found, and altered serum levels of sMICA have been reported in multiple health and disease conditions (16).

Zou et al. (17) documented MICA expression on freshly isolated human fibroblasts and a marked decrease when fibroblasts were grown to confluence in culture dishes. By contrast, increased MICA expression was found during the proliferation of fibroblasts, possibly acting as a support for the host response to injury.

Much interest exists in the study of the relationship of MICA with cancer. MICA was found to be expressed on the surface of several neoplastic cells, where it may enhance innate immunity by stimulating NK cells and participating in T cell immunity by costimulation of CD8+lymphocytes. Several tumors can release soluble MICA, and soluble MICA has been reported to inhibit the stimulating pathway mediated by NKG2D.

Cetacean morbilliviruses and papillomaviruses, as well as Brucella spp. and Toxoplasma gondii, are thought to interfere with population abundance by inducing high mortalities, lowering reproductive success or by synergistically increasing the virulence of other infectious pathogens. Severe cases of lobomycosis and lobomycosis-like disease (LLD) indicate that these infections may contribute to the death of some dolphins. Environmental contamination seems to play a role in these diseases because, as already reported, many pollutants are known as immunosuppressors and can adversely affect the immune status of cetaceans. The cetacean skin is an important tissue district of the immune system, and the MICA protein, which was used in this study as a toxicological stress marker of the immune system, is expressed in fibroblasts.

The aim of this study, in fact, was to evaluate MICA protein expression in fibroblast cell cultures of cetaceans (skin biopsies of free-ranging specimens and skin samples of stranded cetaceans within 2–12 h of death) by an immunofluorescence technique and to outline possible variations in MICA expression linked to differential ecological and biological factors, while also investigating MICA expression after in vitro treatments with different contaminants. Free-ranging or stranded specimens of cetaceans were sampled in the Sea of Cortez (Mexico) [Bryde's whale (B. edeni), long-beaked common dolphin (D. capensis), and killer whale (O. orca)] and in the Mediterranean Sea [fin whale (B. physalus), sperm whale (P. microcephalus), T. truncatus, and striped dolphin (S. coeruleoalba)], and the cell cultures were treated with organochlorine compound (OC) mixture, flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), MeHg, and bisphenol A (BPA).

Materials and Methods

Sampling Methods

Free-Ranging Cetaceans

Samples of skin biopsies (epidermis, dermis, and blubber) were obtained from free-ranging specimens of long-beaked common dolphin (MDC12) and striped dolphin (STG96) using an aluminum pole armed with biopsy tips (0.7 cm ø, 3.0 cm length), while skin biopsies from free-ranging specimens of Bryde's whale (MBE3), killer whale (MOO12), sperm whale (PMAs1 and PMAs2), fin whale (BPT1), and bottlenose dolphin (TTAs1) were obtained using a Barnett Wildcat II crossbow with a 150-pound test bow, using a biopsy dart with modified stainless steel collecting tip (0.9 cm ø, 4.0 cm length). Biopsy samples were taken in the dorsal area near the dorsal fin, with CITES authorization (CITES Nat. IT025IS, Int. CITES IT 007), in the Sea of Cortez (MDC12, MBE3, and MOO12) and Mediterranean Sea (PMAs1, PMAs2, BPT1, TTAs1, and STG96). A little biopsy fragment was immediately stored in cell medium for cell cultures.

Stranded Cetaceans

Skin tissue of stranded cetaceans (dead for only 2–12 h) was obtained from specimens found dead along the Italian coastline in the period 2005–2009. Samples were taken from beneath the dorsal fin of stranded specimens of fin whale (RT25) and striped dolphin (RT17 and RT23) and immediately placed in cell medium.

Sex Identification

Sex determination in cetaceans was performed by genetic investigations according to Berubè and Palsboll (18). The sex of specimens was as follows: MDC12 female (F), STG96 male (M), MBE3 (F), MOO12 (M), PMAs1 (M), PMAs2 (M), TTAs1 (F), RT25 (M), (BPT1 (F), RT23 (F), and RT17 (M).

Fibroblast Cell Cultures

The development of a non-invasive sampling method for obtaining viable tissue samples for cell cultures from skin biopsies of free-ranging and stranded cetaceans was described by Marsili et al. (19). Successful cell cultures were obtained from all the specimens.

After the animals were sampled, each skin sample was stored in sterile medium MEM Eagle Earle's salts w/L-glutamine and sodium bicarbonate + 10% gamma irradiated fetal calf serum + 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (NEAA) solution 100x + 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin 100x + 0.1% Amphotericin B 100x at room temperature and was processed within 24 h of collection. In the laboratory, each sample was washed with Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS) containing antibiotic (Penicillin/Streptomycin 100x) and antimycotic (Amphotericin B 100x) solutions. All specimens were handled under strict sterility conditions. First, the collected tissue was cut into small pieces with curved surgical scissors, placed in 30-mm Petri dishes and incubated with Trypsin-EDTA solution 1x for 15 min at 37°C. The biopsy fragments were washed again and then placed in Falcon 25 flasks, moistened with medium. After 24 h at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2, the cultures were covered with 1 ml of medium. Half of the culture medium was replaced every 48 h with fresh medium.

Indirect Immunofluorescence Technique

Fibroblast cell cultures (third generation) were subjected to this experimental protocol for 48 h. The preliminary test that we conducted concerned the treatment of fibroblasts with an inducer and a repressor of the immune system. We used cyclosporine A (CsA), a drug belonging to the category of immunosuppressants, along with β-glucan, a polysaccharide known to increase immune system response. For the main research the different cell lines were exposed as follows: (1) to a mixture of organochlorines (Arochlor 1260, pp′-DDT and pp′-DDE), solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.05%) (named OCs), at three doses: 0.01, 0.1, and 1 μg/ml, plus a DMSO (0.05%) control; (2) to a mixture of benzo(a)pyrene (1 mM) and beta-naphthoflavone (20 mM), solubilized in acetone (0.1%) (named PAHs), at three doses: C = (0.5 μM BaP + 10 μM BnF), B = (2.5 μM BaP + 50 μM BnF), and A = (12.5 μM BaP + 250 μM BnF), plus an acetone (0.1%) control; (3) to a mixture containing 27 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), from mono- to deca-brominated (BDE-MXE), solubilized in nonane (0.01 μg/ml) (named PBDEs) at three doses: 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 μg/ml, plus a nonane (0.01 μg/ml) chemical control; 4) to bisphenol A (BPA) solubilized in ethanol (0.1%) (named BPA), at four doses: 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg/ml, plus an ethanol (0.1%) control; and 5) to hydrosoluble and therefore solubilized in cultured medium methylmercury (MeHg), at four doses: 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μM.

We applied immunofluorescence to fibroblast cell cultures for a qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of target protein MICA. After fixing and extraction with methanol and acetone at −20°C, we conducted a first reaction with the primary polyclonal antibody (Ab) (rabbit polyclonal anti-MICA Ab; Abcam), the cells were treated with the secondary Ab (Alexa Fluor 568 rabbit anti-goat IgG (H + L) for MICA) and labeled with red-fluorescent Alexa Fluor dye. Immunofluorescence was quantified with a specially designed Olympus Soft Imaging Systems macro, DetectIntZ, which works with the image acquisition, processing and analysis system, analySISB (Olympus) (20). The image analysis procedure has the objective of quantifying, with an adimensional index generated for this purpose, the amount of Alexa Fluor localized on the cytoplasmic membrane of the various cell preparations. The cells under study were imaged using DAPI, and this image was presented to the operator for threshold selection of cytoplasmatic and nuclear regions of interest (ROI) across the field. The procedure then utilized these ROI to measure the fluorescence intensity with Alexa Fluor of the different cell samples and the results were summarized in a worksheet. The system generated index values that are unitless until compared with other units, such as number of cells to obtain mean fluorescence per cell or the area in which it was calculated to obtain the mean fluorescence per mm2. Images were all obtained with a magnification of 20X, a calibration of 0.65 μm/pixel and a resolution of 1,360 × 1,024 x 8 pixel. Exposure times were fixed while reading MICA expression for each treatment. A series of images of each slide was acquired so that a minimum of 250 cells/slide could be counted. The total fluorescence revealed by the program was then divided by the number of cells to obtain an arbitrary unity of fluorescence (AUF) per cell. Several slides for MICA were made for each culture: one was a blank (cells treated only with primary and secondary antibodies), one was a secondary blank (cells treated only with the secondary antibody), one was a chemical blank (cells treated with contaminant carrier), and two were for each treatment dose of all contaminants. The former two blank samples enabled the natural presence of the target proteins in cultured fibroblasts to be checked, while the secondary blank enabled validation of the dose of secondary Abs without cross reaction, as the primary Ab was absent.

Organochlorine Analysis

Analyses for DDTs and PCBs were performed according to methods recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081/8082, with modifications (21, 22). The analytical method used was High Resolution Capillary Gas Chromatography with an Agilent 6890N and a 63Ni ECD and an SBP-5 bonded phase capillary column (30 m long, 0.2 mm i.d.). The carrier gas was nitrogen, with a head pressure of 15.5 psi (splitting ratio 50/1). The scavenger gas was argon/methane (95/5) at 40 ml/min. The oven temperature was 100°C for the first 10 min, after which it was increased to 280°C at 5°C/min. Injector and detector temperatures were 200 and 280°C, respectively. The extracted organic material (EOM%) from the freeze-dried samples was calculated in all samples. Capillary gas chromatography revealed op′- and pp′- isomers of DDT and its derivatives DDD and DDE and revealed ~30 PCB congeners. Total PCBs were quantified as the sum of all congeners. These congeners represented 80% of the total peak area of the PCBs in the samples. Total DDT was calculated as the sum of op-DDT, pp′-DDT, op′-DDD, pp′-DDD, op′-DDE and pp′-DDE. The results were expressed in nanograms per gram of lipid weight (ng/g l.w.).

Statistical Analysis

Shapiro-Wilks test has been used to evaluate if the population is normally distributed (p > 0.05). Findings showed that all the investigated groups were non-normal distributed. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum) was used to summarize the data. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r-Spearman) was instead used in order to measure the degree of association between This indicator ranges from +1 to −1. A value of 0 indicates that no association exists between the two variables. A value greater/lower than 0 indicates a positive/negative association between the variables investigated. Finally, the non-parametric tests of Kruskal-Wallis (p < 0.05) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (p < 0.05) were used to determine if the levels of MICA, DDTs, and PCBs significantly differ between specimens and if the levels of MICA in the cells significantly differ between doses and type of treatments.

Results and Discussion

Basal Levels of MICA in Different Species

The basal level of MICA, evaluated with immunofluorescence technique in the fibroblasts of different cetacean species, is the first important result to indicate the immune status of the specimens sampled in different areas. In particular, these data were compared to DDT and PCB levels detected in the blubber samples of the same specimens. The mean values, expressed as immunofluorescence for cell (AUF/nucleus) for MICA and as ng/g lipid weight for OCs, are presented in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Basal levels of immunofluorescence (AUF/nucleus) of MICA (line) in fibroblast cells and mean levels of DDTs and PCBs (ng/g lipid weight) (histograms) in blubber of B. edeni, D. capensis, O. orca, P. macrocephalus, T. truncatus, S. coeruleoalba, and B. physalus. The red dotted line represents the PCB threshold (17 ppm l.w.) indicated to produce deleterious effects in marine mammals.

The three species from the Sea of Cortez (B. edeni, D. capensis, and O. orca) exhibited a basal activity of MICA higher than the Mediterranean species, except for the free-ranging striped dolphin STG96, and correspondingly lower levels of DDTs and PCBs. Despite the low total sample number, a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient equal to −0.59 also confirmed this tendency for high levels of MICA and low total OC levels (Figure 2). In fact, in the guidelines to interpreting Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, this association is medium. Interestingly, in the Mexican species, the PCB levels did not exceed the estimated toxicity threshold (17 mg/kg l.w.) for deleterious health effects set by Jepson et al. (23) and Kannan et al. (24) (Figure 1); this indicates that, in this area the toxicological risk for these marine mammals is low, regardless of their position in the trophic chain. Instead, the basal activity of MICA in species of the Sea of Cortez seems to be related to their different diets, with an enhanced activity parallel to the increase of their trophic level, while noting that B. edeni feeds mainly on blue fish and is not strictly plankton-eating as B. physalus is in the Mediterranean Sea. However, the total OC levels of B. edeni were the lowest, showing that plankton intake is not negligible in the diet. In the Sea of Cortez, the specimens had been sampled while free-ranging, by skin biopsy, so they were all supposedly healthy; consequently, the differences both in the accumulation and in the immune response were most likely linked to ecological and biological factors and not to a more or less compromised health condition, as in the case of stranded specimens. In the Mediterranean Sea, instead, three samples came from specimens found stranded alive and then died (B. physalus RT25 and S. coeruleoalba RT17 and RT23), while five came from free-ranging specimens (P. microcephalus PMAs1 and PMAs2, T. truncatus TTAs1, B. physalus BPT1, and S. coeruleoalba STG96). Regardless of the type of sampling (free-ranging or stranded), the health condition, the position in the trophic chain, and the sex, all the herein investigated specimens had consistent tissue levels of both DDTs and PCBs. The latter xenobiotics far exceeded the toxicity threshold of 17 ppm, except for the free-ranging fin whale BPT1, and the MICA response was globally much lower than in the Sea of Cortez species.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Trend Line (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = −0.59) between MICA (AUF/nucleus) in fibroblast cells and OCs (ng/g lipid weight) in blubber of B. edeni, D. capensis, O. orca, P. macrocephalus, T. truncatus, S. coeruleoalba, and B. physalus.

Since MICA has a non-parametric distribution, evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilks test (p < 0.00156), a non-parametric statistical analysis was used to compare the different variables. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test and putting the data together according to the sampling area, without considering the single species, we verified that MICA expression was significantly different (p = 0.0247) between the Sea of Cortez and the Mediterranean Sea samples. The same occurred with the levels of DDTs and PCBs (p = 0.0412).

Based upon the results of the present study, we can affirm that the environment in which the specimens live and, accordingly, the anthropogenic stress “magnitude” to which they are subjected, are key determinants in MICA protein-based immune responses. It is well-known that the Mediterranean Sea is highly contaminated by several anthropogenic activities, such as coastal urbanization and industrialization, oil tanker traffic and general maritime transport, fisheries, and agricultural waste (25). Sea of Cortez instead is considered close to a pristine environment, with a low anthropogenic impact (26). Therefore, it can be also inferred that the lower the anthropogenic stress of the specimens is, the higher is the basal activity of MICA.

Regarding the Mediterranean species, the two fin whale specimens had the lowest OC levels related to other species, and this is in line with what we have always found in this basin, depending on the different trophic position (21, 27). However, the B. physalus RT25 concentrations were very high compared to those found in B. physalus BPT1 (~7 times for the DDTs and PCBs) and in other Mediterranean fin whale specimens, both stranded and free-ranging (25). The mysticete RT25, found stranded in January 2011 along the Tyrrhenian coast of Italy, showed an unprecedented coinfection by Dolphin Morbillivirus (DMV) and Toxoplasma gondii, together with high OC pollutant concentrations, with special reference to DDTs (28). Therefore, the basal activity of MICA might have been higher than that of a free-ranging fin whale as a function of a response to these multiple stress factors Instead, the free-ranging fin whale BPT1 had a higher MICA value, with considerably lower OC xenobiotic levels. Within such context, it is of interest that the hepatitis B virus (HBV), for example, suppresses the expression of MICA/B on hepatoma cells through the upregulation of transcription factors GATA2 and GATA3 to escape from NK cell immune surveillance (29), and a similar pathogenetic mechanism could also be shared by DMV and T. gondii. In addition, for the striped dolphin specimens, we obtained comparable results: RT17 and RT23, both stranded animals, had PCB levels higher than free-ranging STG96, but the opposite was true for MICA. Furthermore, the RT23 individual was also infected by DMV. The other specimens sampled by biopsy, belonging to bottlenose dolphin (TTA1) and sperm whale (PMAs1 and PMAs2) species, had MICA levels like the stranded striped dolphin and fin whale specimens. An explanation could be linked also to interspecies differences or to sex or age variability. In this respect, a non-parametric statistical test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) showed that no significant differences existed between males and females in MICA levels, without considering the sampling area and the species. In the striped dolphin group, however, we had two specimens of different sex that were both stranded, with an adult and almost certainly sexually mature (190 cm) individual (RT23) and a male subadult (168 cm) (RT17). In these specimens, at similar tissue concentrations of OC pollutants, a similar level of MICA expression was found. All that we have highlighted with these results makes it difficult to explain if the activity of MICA has an upregulation or a downregulation with a toxicological stress. What we know is that, in humans (Homo sapiens sapiens), where it is most studied, MICA protein has a low level of expression in healthy epithelial tissues but is upregulated in many tumors (3032) and under various cellular stress stimuli, including heat shock proteins, DNA damage, and viral infections (3336). MICA also functions as a ligand recognized by the activating receptor Natural Killer Group 2D (NKG2D), which is expressed on the surface of Natural Killer (NK) cells, Natural Killer T cells (NKT), CD8+ T cells (often called cytotoxic T lymphocytes, or CTLs) and T-cell receptor (TCR)γδ+ T cells. McGilvray et al. (37) reported that NKG2D ligands were highly expressed in lymph node metastasis of stage I colorectal cancer samples, but they were expressed in lower amounts in Stage II, III, or IV tumors. A higher expression of MICA in colorectal cancer patients was associated with a good prognosis (38). MICA molecules exist also in soluble forms (sMICA) and altered serum levels of sMICA have been reported in multiple health and disease conditions. For example, in the case of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) the control serum had soluble MICA values ≤ 5 pg/ml, whereas the serum from diseased patients had values ≥ 5 pg/ml (39). The higher level of sMICA in the blood serum from HCV-infected, HCC-affected patients highlighted the possible role of MICA as a tumor suppressor. However, the elevation of serum sMICA was shown to be associated with a poor prognosis in various cancer patients (4043), thereby emphasizing once again the difficulty of interpreting the quantitative response. Nothing is known about the “stress” caused by environmental contaminants, although NKG2D expression has also been shown to be regulated by estradiol (44). Endometrial cells exposed to estradiol upregulated MICA protein expression (45). In this respect, the MICA promoter contains an estrogen receptor response element, suggesting that estrogens may increase MICA expression through transcriptional regulation. Consequently, provided that many of the xenobiotics accumulated by these marine mammals are known as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), they could exert biologic activities similar to that of estradiol.

Since MICA expression has been extensively investigated in human studies, a comparison of the basal activity of MICA in cetacean fibroblasts with those of a human biopsy carried out for medical investigations was also deemed of interest. In human fibroblasts, the basal activity of MICA resulted in 11.863 AUF/nucleus and therefore was lower than that of all the herein investigated cetacean specimens. In the biomedical literature, no studies on MICA expression in human fibroblasts have been made available before the present investigation, that was carried out by means of an indirect immunofluorescence technique. Unfortunately, no subcutaneous adipose tissue was sampled in the human biopsy, so that we cannot correlate the levels of DDTs and PCBs with the values of MICA. Regardless of this, we can still infer that the levels of MICA in human fibroblasts are lower than those of all investigated cetacean species but very similar to those of the sperm whale PMAs1 and the striped dolphin RT17 and generally to most of the Mediterranean specimens.

However, given that even in humans, as already mentioned above, whether MICA showed an upregulation or a downregulation in the presence of a “generic” stress(or), is difficult to determine.

The results of each specimen whose cells were treated with the two compounds are expressed as index numbers (AUF Treatment: AUF BA = X Index Number: 100) and shown in Table 1. The sample named BA is the blank or “basal activity sample,” which is the cultured fibroblasts treated only with primary and secondary antibodies. The doses applied to induce and repress expression were established according to the literature (4651).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Immunofluorescence of MICA, expressed as index numbers relative to the blank (BA), revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species and humans treated with the immune response activator (β-glucan), and suppressor (Cyclosporine A).

The results were quite contradictory: in killer whales, in fact, MICA showed a downregulation with both the inducer and the lower dose of the repressor but upregulation with the higher dose of repressor; in striped dolphins, by contrast, the upregulation was already present at the lower dose of the repressor, whereas at the highest dose, we observed a complete cell death, with this same effects also occurring in humans, but with both the inductor and the low-dose repressor, downregulation occurs; finally, in bottlenose dolphins and in fin whales, downregulation occurred with all the treatments. Most likely, the choice of the two compounds, known to have such capabilities in relation to the immune system but not specifically in respect to MICA, should be reassessed.

MICA in Different Species After Treatment With OCs, PBDEs, PAHs, BPA, and MeHg

After the basal activity of the different specimens had been evaluated, trying to evaluate how much MICA was modified following treatment with some of the main environmental contaminants with which these animals come into contact in their living environment was deemed of interest. Since most of these toxicants are not water-soluble and therefore need a carrier (for example, DMSO, or nonane) to treat the fibroblasts, the basal activity with which the different treatments were compared is relative to that given by the carrier. This way of proceeding is correct because upregulation of MICA very often had already occurred with the solvent alone. The toxicity of different solvents to cells was previously demonstrated in other studies (20, 52).

In Figure 3, we reported the results of the mean levels of immunofluorescence of MICA, which was revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different species treated with OCs and expressed as index numbers relative to the solvent control (DMSO). According to Figure 3, the response was very different between the species and at different doses: killer whale and striped dolphin specimens showed no increase in MICA expression at any dose; in the long-beaked common dolphin, the MICA level remained unchanged until the highest treatment, where we had a downregulation; the two fin whale specimens showed neither upregulation nor downregulation at any dose; and only in the case of the sperm whale and Bryde's whale that we assisted we observed a clear upregulation effect on MICA due to OCs, compared to DMSO. The two specimens of sperm whale showed the same response curve, while the Bryde's whale had an equal response to that of man, that is, a bell-shaped response.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Mean values of immunofluorescence of MICA expressed as index numbers respect to the solvent control (DMSO) revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species and in man treated with OCs. Red arrows indicate a significant upregulation respect to DMSO control, yellow arrow a significant downregulation.

Figure 4 shows results of the mean levels of immunofluorescence of MICA, revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species treated with the PBDEs, which are expressed as index numbers relative to the solvent control (nonane). In the sperm whale (PMAs2), striped dolphin, and fin whale specimens, the highest response of MICA was the one related to the flame retardant treatment, with a bell-shaped response in all species; the long-beaked common dolphin showed an upregulation at the highest dose; a discontinuous response was shown by sperm whale (PMAS1), whereas Bryde's whale and the killer whale showed a downregulation. Additionally, in this case, as for the OCs, the two striped dolphins responded in the same way, even if the flame retardants lead to upregulation and the OCs to downregulation.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Mean values of immunofluorescence of MICA expressed as index numbers relative to the solvent control (nonane) revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species treated with PBDEs. Red arrows indicate a significant upregulation respect to nonano control, yellow arrow a significant downregulation.

In Figure 5, the results are reported for the mean levels of immunofluorescence of MICA, which was detected in cultured fibroblasts of different species treated with PAHs and expressed as index numbers relative to the solvent control (acetone). Only two species, the long-beaked common dolphin and the sperm whale (PMAS1), were exposed to PAHs. In the sperm whale, a significant increase was present in the level of MICA, with a trend in the dose/response type. The long-beaked common dolphin showed a discontinuous response but overall a downregulation.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Mean values of immunofluorescence of MICA expressed as index numbers respect to the solvent control (acetone) revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species treated with PAHs.

Figure 6 shows the results of the mean levels of immunofluorescence of MICA, found in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species treated with BPA and expressed as index numbers relative to the solvent control (ethanol). We investigated only two specimens: a fin whale and a striped dolphin. Their responses were markedly different, even if the higher dose caused the death of all cells in both animals, thus highlighting its toxicity. Only the fin whale fibroblasts exhibited an upregulation phenomenon compared to the solvent control.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Mean values of immunofluorescence of MICA expressed as index numbers respect to the solvent control (ethanol) revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species treated with BPA.

Figure 7 shows results of the mean levels of immunofluorescence of MICA, found in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species and man treated with MeHg and expressed as index numbers with respect to the blank and represented by cells treated only with primary and secondary antibodies. Although the responses were different, in the two cetacean species compared to human skin fibroblasts, at least one dose of treatment with MeHg caused upregulation of MICA. Additionally, in this case, as for PAHs in cetaceans, the higher dose caused the death of all cells, while in man with this dose, an evident upregulation of MICA was documented.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Mean values of immunofluorescence of MICA expressed as index numbers respect to basal activity revealed in cultured fibroblasts of different cetacean species and in man treated with MeHg.

Summary of Treatment Results

What we can summarize from all the herein presented results is shown in Table 2, where for each specimen, the results of upregulation, downregulation, or no MICA response, following a specific treatment, are reported.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Summary of response types with different treatments in different specimens.

Some specimens had the same response patterns even with different treatments, such as the killer whale (MOO12), which always underwent a downregulation with both OCs and PBDEs. In both cases, the differences between the carrier and the doses were statistically significant with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05). The long-beaked common dolphin (MDC12) showed a downregulation with both OCs and PAHs, while simultaneously exhibiting an upregulation with PBDEs. Again, these responses were statistically significant. The Bryde's whale (MBE3) showed a MICA upregulation with OCs and a downregulation with PBDEs, both statistically significant. In the two specimens of sperm whale, the predominant response was an upregulation. Downregulation occurred in PMAs1 only for the PBDE treatment, but it was not statistically significant, unlike all others, both in PMAs1 and in PMAs2. RT23 and RT17 specimens of striped dolphins showed the same MICA behavior after treatments, with downregulation with PCBs and upregulation with PBDEs. Whereas, with PCBs, the reaction was statistically significant in both samples, for the PBDEs, it was not. With BPA in the RT23 striped dolphin, we did not observe a different response between the carrier and the doses. The STG96 striped dolphin treated with MeHg showed a statistically significant upregulation. The two specimens of fin whales (RT25 and BPT1) treated with OCs did not show a change in MICA levels between the carrier and the doses, whereas they constantly exhibited a statistically significant upregulation with the other treatments. Finally, in human fibroblast cell cultures, taken as a comparative study model, MICA upregulation occurred with OCs and with MeHg and, in both cases, it was statistically significant.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we can state that MICA expression has been extensively investigated herein and validated as an important immune response biomarker in cetaceans, with the possibility of being also evaluated in skin biopsies from free-ranging individuals, when it is not possible to have blood as the biological investigation material. The response of upregulation or downregulation in the presence of some of the main environmental contaminants needs to be explored further, both from an ecological and biological standpoint. In fact, factors such as the area in which cetaceans live, coupled with their position(s) within the marine food webs as well as their sex, age, and their general health condition(s) can strongly influence MICA expression patterns. However, equally evident is that MICA expression modifications/alterations occur both with an increase or with a decrease in ecotoxicological stress levels, indicating either a “stress condition” or an immune response alteration/modification. The main result of this study refers, therefore, to “ecotoxicological stress-associated MICA expression's modulation,” and this is particularly interesting because these marine mammals are the main accumulators of liposoluble and persistent contaminants. If the accumulation of these substances joins the presence of infectious pathogens, such as DMV or T. gondii, these exposures and their deleterious effects could be potentially amplified, making the synergy of the two phenomena inseparable in the evaluation of the conservation status of these highly threatened and vulnerable species.

Ethics Statement

The cetaceans tissues collection procedure was carried out in strict accordance with the relevant national and international guidelines under CITES permits (CITES Nat. IT025IS, Int. CITES IT 007).

Author Contributions

LM designed and provided the resources for the study and performed the sampling, in vitro experiments and laboratory analysis and also elaborated the data and wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. GDG and SM provided scientific support in the interpretation of lab data and they also revised and critically reviewed the manuscript. SC collaborated in performing the in vitro experiments, lab investigations, and data analysis and also wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors particularly thank the valuable collaborators in the cetacean sampling: for the free-ranging cetaceans, Maria Cristina Fossi and Jorge Urban Ramirez with their teams, and for the stranded cetaceans, Fabrizio Cancelli, Tommaso Renieri, Fabrizio Serena, Cecilia Mancusi, and Giuliana Terracciano. They also thank Laura Carletti and Daniele Coppola for the laboratory investigations.

References

1. Beineke A, Siebert U, Wohlsein P, Baumgärtner W. Immunology of whales and dolphins. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2010) 133:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Desforges JPW, Sonne C, Levin M, Siebert U, De Guise S, Dietz R. Immunotoxic effects of environmental pollutants in marine mammals. Environ Int. (2016) 86:126–39. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Desforges JP, Sonne C, Dietz R, Levin M. Immunotoxic effects of environmental pollutants in marine mammals. In: Fossi MC, Panti C, editors. Marine Mammal Ecotoxicology: Impacts of Multiple Stressors on Population Health. London: Elsevier (2018). p. 321–36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812144-3.00012-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Díaz-Delgado J, Groch KR, Ressio R, Riskallah IPJ, Sierra E, Sacchini S, et al. Comparative immunopathology of Cetacean morbillivirus infection in free-ranging dolphins from Western Mediterranean, Northeast-Central, and Southwestern Atlantic. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:485. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Levin M, Morsey B, Mori C, Guise S. Specific non-coplanar PCB-mediated modulation of bottlenose dolphin and beluga whale phagocytosis upon in vitro exposure. J Toxic Environ Health A. (2004) 67:1517–35. doi: 10.1080/15287390490486761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fair PA, Schaefer AM, Houser DS, Bossart GD, Romano TA, Champagne CD, et al. The environment as a driver of immune and endocrine responses in dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0176202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ritz C, Streibig JC. Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw. (2005) 12:1–22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v012.i05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Pellissó SC, Muñoz MJ, Carballo M, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Determination of the immunotoxic potential of heavy metals on the functional activity of bottlenose dolphin leukocytes in vitro. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2008) 121:189–98. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.09.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schaefer AM, Stavros H-CW, Bossart GD, Fair PA, Goldstein JD, Reif JS. Associations between mercury and hepatic, renal, endocrine, and hematological parameters in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) along the eastern coast of Florida and South Carolina. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. (2011) 61:688–95. doi: 10.1007/s00244-011-9651-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fair PA, Romano T, Schaefer AM, Reif JS, Bossart GD, Houde M, et al. Associations between perfluoroalkyl compounds and immune and clinical chemistry parameters in highly exposed bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Environ Toxicol Chem. (2013) 32:736–46. doi: 10.1002/etc.2122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Nakata H, Sakakibara A, Kanoh M, Kudo S, Watanabe H, Nagai N, et al. Evaluation of mitogen-induced responses in marine mammal and human lymphocytes by in-vitro exposure of butyltins and non-ortho coplanar PCBs. Environ Pollut. (2002) 120:245–53. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00155-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wirth JR, Peden-Adams MM, White ND, Bossart GD, Fair P. In vitro exposure of DE-71, a penta-PBDE mixture, on immune endpoints in bottlenose dolphins (tursiops truncatus) and B6C3F1 mice. J Appl Toxicol. (2014) 35:191–8. doi: 10.1002/jat.3008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wirth JR, Peden-Adams MM, White ND, Bossart GD, Fair PA. In vitro PFOS exposure on immune endpoints in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and mice. J Appl Toxicol. (2014) 34:658–66. doi: 10.1002/jat.2891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Amroun H, Djoudi H, Busson M, Allat R, El Sherbini SM, Sloma I, et al. Early-onset ankylosing spondylitis is associated with a functional MICA polymorphism. Hum Immunol. (2005) 66:1057–61. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2005.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Douik H, Ben Chaaben A, Attia Romdhane N, Romdhane HB, Mamoghli T, Fortier C, et al. Association of MICA-129 polymorphism with nasopharyngeal cancer risk in a Tunisian population .Hum Immunol. (2009) 70:45–8. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zain A, Medhat A. MICA (MHC Class I polypeptide-related sequence A). Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. (2015) 19. Available online at: http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/MICAID41364ch6p21.html

Google Scholar

17. Zou Y, Mirbaha F, Stastny P. Contact inhibition causes strong downregulation of expression of MICA in human fibroblasts and decreased NK cell killing. Hum Immunol. (2006) 67:183–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.02.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Berubè M, Palsboll P. Identification of sex in cetaceans by multiplexing wih three ZFX and ZFY specific primers. Mol Ecol. (1996) 5:283–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00315.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Marsili L, Fossi MC, Neri G, Casini S, Gardi C, Palmeri S, et al. Skin biopsies for cell cultures from Mediterranean free-ranging cetaceans. Mar Environ Res. (2000) 50:523–6. doi: 10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00128-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Marsili L, Casini S, Bucalossi D, Porcelloni S, Maltese S, Fossi MC. Use of immunofluorescence technique in cultured fibroblasts from Mediterranean cetaceans as new “in vitro” tool to investigate effects of environmental contaminants. Mar Environ Res. (2008) 66:151–3. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.02.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Marsili L, Focardi S. Organochlorine levels in subcutaneous blubber biopsies of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) and striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) from the Mediterranean Sea. Environ Pollut. (1996) 91:1–9. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(95)00037-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Marsili L, Focardi S. Chlorinated hydrocarbons (HCB, DDTs and PCBs) levels in cetaceans stranded along the Italian coasts, an overview. Environ Monitor Assess. (1997) 45:129–80.

Google Scholar

23. Jepson PD, Bennett PM, Deaville R, Allchin CR, Baker JR, Law RJ. Relationships between polychlorinated biphenyls and health status in harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) stranded in the United Kingdom. Environ Toxicol Chem. (2005) 24:238–48. doi: 10.1897/03-663.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kannan K, Blankenship AL, Jones PD, Giesy JP. Toxicity reference values for the toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls to aquatic mammals. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. (2000) 6:181–200. doi: 10.1080/10807030091124491

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Marsili L, Jimenez B, Borrell A. Persistent organic pollutants in cetaceans living in a hotspot area: the Mediterranean Sea. In: Fossi MC and Panti C, editors. Marine Mammal Ecotoxicology: Impacts of Multiple Stressors on Population Health. London: Elsevier/Academic Press (2018). p. 185–212. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812144-3.00007-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Fossi MC, Panti C, Marsili L, Maltese S, Coppola D, Jimenez B, et al. Could feeding habit and migratory behaviour be the causes of different toxicological hazard to cetaceans of Gulf of California (Mexico)? Environ Sci Pollut Re. (2014) 21:13353–66. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2574-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fossi MC, Casini S, Marsili L. Potential toxicological hazard due to endocrine-disrupting chemicals on Mediterranean top predators: state of art, gender differences and methodological tools. Environ Res. (2007) 104:174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mazzariol S, Marcer F, Mignone W, Serracca L, Goria M, Marsili L, et al. Dolphin Morbillivirus and Toxoplasma gondii coinfection in a Mediterranean fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus). BMC Vet Res. (2012) 8:20. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Guan Y, Li W, Hou Z, Han Q, Lan P, Zhang J, et al. HBV suppresses expression of MICA/B on hepatoma cells through up-regulation of transcription factors GATA2 and GATA3 to escape from NK cell surveillance. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:56107–19. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11271

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Pende D, Rivera P, Marcenaro S, Chang CC, Biassoni R, Conte R, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain a and UL16-binding protein expression on tumor cell lines of different histotypes: analysis of tumor susceptibility to NKG2D-dependent natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Cancer Res. (2002) 62:6178–86.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

31. Friese MA, Platten M, Lutz SZ, Naumann U, Aulwurm S, Bischo F, et al. MICA/NKG2D-mediated immunogene therapy of experimental gliomas. Cancer Res. (2003) 63:8996–9006.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

32. Vetter CS, Groh V, thor Straten P, Spies T, Brocker EB, Becker JC. Expression of stress-induced MHC class I related chain molecules on human melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. (2002) 118:600–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01700.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Groh V, Bahram S, Bauer S, Herman A, Beauchamp M, Spies T. Cell stress-regulated human major histocompatibility complex class I gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1996) 93:12445–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12445

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Groh V, Steinle A, Bauer S, Spies T. Recognition of stress-induced MHC molecules by intestinal epithelial gammadelta T cells. Science. (1998) 279:1737–40. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5357.1737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Groh V, Rhinehart R, Randolph-Habecker J, Topp M, Riddell S, Spies T. Costimulation of CD8alphabeta T cells by NKG2D via engagement by MIC induced on virus-infected cells. Nat Immunol. (2001) 2:255–60. doi: 10.1038/85321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Gasser S, Orsulic S, Brown EJ, Raulet DH. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature. (2005) 436:1186–90. doi: 10.1038/nature03884

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. McGilvray RW, Eagle RA, Watson NF, Al-Attar A, Ball G, Jafferji I, et al. NKG2D ligand expression in human colorectal cancer reveals associations with prognosis and evidence for immunoediting. Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 15:6993–7002. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Watson NF, Spendlove I, Madjd Z, McGilvray R, Green AR, Ellis IO, et al. Expression of the stress-related MHC class I chain-related protein MICA is an indicator of good prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. (2006) 118:1445–52. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kumar V, Yi Lo PH, Sawai H., Kato N, Takahashi A, Deng Z, et al. Soluble MICA and a MICA variation as possible prognostic biomarkers for HBV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e44743 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044743

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Holdenrieder S, Stieber P, Peterfi A, Nagel D, Steinle A, Salih HL. Soluble MICA in malignant diseases. Int J Cancer. (2006) 118:684–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Nückel H, Switala M, Sellmann L, Horn PA, Dürig J, Dührsen U, et al. The prognostic significance of soluble NKG2D ligands in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. (2010) 24:1152–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.74

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Li K, Mandai M, Hamanishi J, Matsumura N, Suzuki A, Yagi H, et al. Clinical significance of the NKG2D ligands, MICA/B and ULBP2 in ovarian cancer: high expression of ULBP2 is an indicator of poor prognosis. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2009) 58:641–52. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0585-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Tamaki S, Sanefuzi N, Kawakami M, Aoki K, Imai Y, Yamanaka Y, et al. Association between soluble MICA levels and disease stage IV oral squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese patients. Hum Immunol. (2008) 69:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Spear P, Wu MR, Sentman ML, Sentman CL. NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets. Cancer Immunity. (2013) 13:8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Basu S, Pioli PA, Conejo-Garcia J, Wira CR, Sentman CL. Estradiol regulates MICA expression in human endometrial cells. Clin Immunol. (2008) 129:325–32. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Horl WH, Wanner C, Riegel W, Schlosser W, Wilms H, Schollmeyer P. Reduction of degranulation of polymorphonuclear leucocytes by immunosuppression in patients following cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. (1989) 47:144–8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198901000-00032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Exton MS, von Horsten S, Schult M, Voge J, Strubel T, Donath S, et al. Behaviorally conditioned immunosoppression using cyclosporine A: central nervous system reduces IL-2 production via splenic innervation. J Neuroimmun. (1998) 88:182–91. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(98)00122-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Anderson DP. Environmental factors in fish health: immunological aspects. In: Iwama G, Nakanishi T, editors. The Fish Immune System: Organism, Pathogen and Environment. San Diego CA: Accademic Press (1996). p. 289–310 doi: 10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60277-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sakai M. Current research status of fish immunostimulants. Acquaculture. (1999) 172:63–72. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00436-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Cook MT, Hayball PJ., Hutchinson W, Nowak B, Hayball JD. The efficacy of a commercial β-glucan preparation, EcoActiva, on stimulating respiratory burst activityof head-kidney macrophages from pink snapper (Pagrus auratus), Sparidae. Fish Shellf Immunol. (2001) 11:661–72. doi: 10.1006/fsim.2001.0343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Lowry VK, Farnell MB, Ferro PJ, Swaggerty CL, Bahl A, Kogut MH. Purified β-glucan as an abiotic feed additive up-regulated the innate immune response in immature chickens against Salmonella enteric serovar Enteritidis. Internat. J Food Microbiol. (2005) 98:309–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.06.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Spinsanti G, Panti C, Bucalossi D, Marsili L, Casini S, Frati F, et al. Selection of reliable reference genes for qRT-PCR studies on cetacean fibroblast cultures exposed to OCs, PBDEs, and 17beta-estradiol. Aquat Toxicol. (2008) 87:178–86. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.01.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MICA, cetaceans, OCs, PBDEs, PAHs, MeHg, BPA

Citation: Marsili L, Di Guardo G, Mazzariol S and Casini S (2019) Insights Into Cetacean Immunology: Do Ecological and Biological Factors Make the Difference? Front. Immunol. 10:1219. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01219

Received: 08 January 2019; Accepted: 13 May 2019;
Published: 31 May 2019.

Edited by:

Mike Criscitiello, Texas A&M University, United States

Reviewed by:

Luigi Abelli, University of Ferrara, Italy
Hai-peng Liu, Xiamen University, China

Copyright © 2019 Marsili, Di Guardo, Mazzariol and Casini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Letizia Marsili, bGV0aXppYS5tYXJzaWxpJiN4MDAwNDA7dW5pc2kuaXQ=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.