- 1Department of Physiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 2Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 3Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- 4Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- 6Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Preterm birth (PTB) continues to be a global health challenge. An over-production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as an altered maternal vaginal microbiome has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammation/infection-associated PTB. Lactobacillus represents the dominant species in the vagina of most healthy pregnant women. The depletion of Lactobacillus in women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) has been associated with an increased risk of PTB. It remains unknown at what point an aberrant vaginal microbiome composition specifically induces the cascade leading to PTB. The ability of oral or vaginal lactobacilli probiotics to reduce BV occurrence and/or dampen inflammation is being considered as a means to prevent PTB. Certain anti-inflammatory properties of lactobacilli suggest potential mechanisms. To date, clinical studies have not been powered with sufficiently high rates of PTB, but overall, there is merit in examining this promising area of clinical science.
Introduction
The etiology of preterm birth (PTB) is multifactorial: 50% of the cases are idiopathic while 20–40% are disease specific or medically indicated deliveries such as pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction (FGR), which require delivery (1, 2). The remaining 25–30% of PTB can be attributed to intrauterine infection and/or inflammation (1, 2). Microorganisms can invade the uterus through the fallopian tube in a retrograde fashion from the abdominal cavity, hematogenously via the placenta or ascending through the cervix and vagina (3).
Mechanism of Inflammation and Infection-Associated Preterm Labor
Microorganisms can reach the maternal intrauterine tissues through any mucosal surface and secrete phospholipase A2 to act on membrane phospholipids and form unesterified arachidonic acid (AA). The AA is converted into endoperoxide products and subsequently into primary prostaglandins (PGs; PGE2, PGF2a) by PGH synthase-2 and isomerases, respectively. Alternatively, some microbes secrete endotoxins, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which specifically bind toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and activate the nuclear factor κ light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFkB) pathway to induce pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression in the intrauterine tissues (amnion, chorion, and decidua), macrophages, and endothelial cells (4, 5). Pro-inflammatory cytokines interact with each other as well as with PGs in a feed-forward cascade, hence amplifying the inflammatory response (6, 7). Furthermore, pro-inflammatory cytokines enhance the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs), which are zinc-dependent enzymes that catalyze the degradation of collagen constituted-extracellular matrix of the cervix, fetal membrane, placenta, and uterus (8–11). Elevated levels of MMP-9 in the maternal plasma, and MMP-3 and MMP-8 in the amniotic fluid are associated with preterm labor (PTL) and/or microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (11–13).
Bacteria and viruses can also cross an intact chorioamniotic membrane and induce intra-amniotic inflammation, a condition termed the fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS). Elevated interleukin (IL)-6 and LPS-binding proteins are observed in the umbilical cord blood in FIRS-affected preterm neonates (14–17). Pathogenic microorganisms such as Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis have been isolated from the umbilical cord blood of very preterm newborns (18). Intrauterine infection can also lead to activation of the fetal hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis giving rise to increased cortisol biosynthesis and decreased metabolism of maternal cortisol to inactive cortisone by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 in the placenta (19). Sustained stimulation of placental corticotropin releasing hormone by fetal cortisol leads to an increase in PG production (20). PG in turn promotes a positive feed-forward loop that comprise an increase in the expression and production of gap junctions such as connexin 43 and pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (20). Together, they promote synchronous and forceful myometrial contractions and PTL.
In short, microbes are well known for their involvement in PTL. In order to understand the origins of these organisms, studies have been undertaken on many sites in the reproductive tract, particularly the vagina.
Altered Vaginal Microbiome and PTB
The vaginal microbiota composition is dynamic throughout a woman’s life. Before puberty, it is dominated by anaerobic bacteria (21). Rising estrogen levels at puberty lead to an increase in mucosal glycogen production whose metabolized substrates support vaginal colonization with lactobacilli (21, 22). This is one reason for the vagina to be highly colonized by lactobacilli during reproductive years and pregnancy (23). At menopause, lactobacilli abundance decreases coinciding with a reduction in circulating estrogen (24–26).
Gram-positive lactobacilli are facultative anaerobic bacteria, whose adherence to the vaginal mucosal epithelia appears to form an important line of defense against pathogens (27). There is no definitive “normal” vaginal microbiota, but in the vast majority of pregnant healthy women, lactobacilli dominate (23, 28, 29). Several important aspects of the vaginal microbiota have been uncovered recently, particularly by sequencing PCR-amplified universal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA): (1) the healthy vaginal microbiota is dominated by a few Lactobacillus species (30); (2) the detection of Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium vaginae, and bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria 1, 2, and 3 (BVAB), is apparent in women with BV (30–32). Due to some variations within sequencing techniques, selection of suitable PCR primers, and sufficient depth, future studies may yet reveal more important profiles of healthy versus infected women (33, 34).
Although relatively few 16S DNA studies have been used with samples from pregnant women, indications are that the microbiota does fluctuate during this time. Some researchers have suggested that there are up to five different community state types (CSTs) of bacteria, clusters generated based on similarity in vaginal bacterial composition, in asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women (23, 35). Three of the CSTs (I, II, III) are dominated by Lactobacillus, namely L. iners, L. crispatus, and L. jensenii and/or L. gasseri. Two others, CST IV-A and CST IV-B have low relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and are composed of Peptoniphilus, Anaerococcus, Corynebacterium, Finegoldia, and Prevotella (CST IV-A), and Atopobium, Sneathia, Gardnerella, Ruminococcaceae, Parvimonas, and Mobiluncus (CST IV-B) (23). Such studies have suggested that the vaginal microbiota composition of pregnant women has a higher abundance of L. vaginalis, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii, but lower CST IV-B bacteria, and is more stable than non-pregnant women (23, 28), with L. crispatus, promoting stability (36). This remains to be verified, but it may be due to hormonal changes. With advancing gestational age, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. increases while that of anaerobe or strict-anaerobe microbial species decreases (37).
Bacterial vaginosis is essentially a polymicrobial dysbiosis, characterized by an alteration in the endogenous vaginal microflora with an absent or decreased proportion of lactobacilli and dominance of G. vaginalis, Prevotella bivia, Mobiluncus sp., Mycoplasma hominis, and A. vaginae (23, 35, 38, 39). Aerobic vaginitis (AE) is an inflammatory condition in which organisms, such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus dominate (40). In many clinical units, the diagnosis of BV involves using a Gram stain Nugent scoring system with or without the Amsel criteria (a vaginal pH >4.5, an amine fishy odor when vaginal fluid is mixed with potassium chloride, the presence of clue cells) (41, 42). A Nugent score of 7–10 seen microscopically as a near absence of rod shaped lactobacilli and high abundance of pathogenic morphotypes is considered BV (42). However, the reliability of the Nugent score has recently been questioned (29). Indeed, sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with BV reveals a diverse array of bacteria, including the presence of L. iners (32, 43, 44). Improvement in diagnostic accuracy for BV can be accomplished by using a DNA level of ≥109 copies/mL for G. vaginalis and ≥108 copies/mL for A. vaginae (45).
The prevalence of BV can vary between populations, but it remains common during pregnancy, where it is associated with a 40% increase in the risk of PTB (46). Women with an abnormal vaginal flora in their first trimester of pregnancy have a higher risk of delivering preterm (39). Although an earlier Cochrane Review (47) suggested that antibiotic treatment of abnormal vaginal flora (intermediate flora or BV) before 20 weeks of gestation may reduce the risk of PTB, a recent Cochrane Review concluded that antibiotic treatment of BV does not reduce the risk of PTB, regardless of when (before 20 weeks or after 20 weeks of gestation) the treatment is given (48). Some of these organisms possess sialidase activity, which has been associated with an increased risk of PTB (49). Sialidases are hydrolytic enzymes that play a role in down-regulating the innate response by degrading immunoglobin-A (IgA), and it has been used in some diagnostic kits for this reason. Higher LPS concentrations, mostly from P. bivia (50), and the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 have been found to be elevated in the cervico-vaginal fluid of pregnant women with BV (51). The elevation in vaginal pH above 4.5 is a feature of BV, and this displaces L. crispatus, but not L. iners, which has adapted to upregulate genes for carbohydrate metabolism (52).
In African American and Hispanic women, a higher abundance of Mycoplasma and lower abundance of BVAB3 is associated with an increased risk of PTB in the second trimester (53). This is unlikely due to race per se, but rather cultural and social aspects. Other pathogens, such as Leptotrichia, Sneathia, BVAB1, and Mobiluncus spp. appear in higher abundance prior to 16 weeks gestation in women with a previous history of PTB and who deliver preterm (54). Yet, such findings are not universal, and other studies, albeit small, have reported no difference in the vaginal microbial composition between women who have a spontaneous PTB and those who deliver at term (37, 55).
Future microbiome studies should focus on the functionality of organisms in the vagina, uterus, and perhaps even the placenta (56). This should include the use of metabolomic analysis to help understand how the vaginal microbiome may influence the risk of PTB.
Role of Immune-Mediators in PTL
The balance of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines, produced by CD4+ T helper (Th) cells, is important in predicting pregnancy outcomes. In early pregnancy, a modest Th1 pro-inflammatory environment promotes successful implantation and placentation (57). As pregnancy progresses, there is a predominance of Th2 anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-4 and IL-10, which maintain uterine quiescence (57). Disruption of the Th1/Th2 balance favoring the predominance of Th1 pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNFα may be responsible for some cases of PTL (7). Chemokines, such as IL-8, chemokine ligand (CCL)-2, 3, 4, and 5 attract decidual leukocytes and lead to the recruitment of additional pro-inflammatory cytokines that amplify the inflammatory cascade (58, 59). In the choriodecidua, levels of CCL2, 3, 4, and 5 are increased in women undergoing PTL both with and without infection when compared to women at term not in labor (59). In the amniotic fluid, levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, CCL3, 4, and 5 are elevated in women with threatened PTL, especially in the presence of intra-amniotic infection, as are IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, and CCL2 in the cervical fluid (60–65). IL-6 is increased in the umbilical blood of infants born to mothers with chorioamnionitis (65–67). Furthermore, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations are increased in maternal plasma women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes and chorioamnionitis (64, 68).
Anti-inflammatory cytokines maintain pregnancy quiescence by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and PGs (69, 70). IL-10 expression in the placenta is lower in women who give birth preterm with chorioamnionitis compared to samples obtained from women who underwent elective terminations in their second trimester of pregnancy (71). The same has been observed in women in term labor with chorioamnionitis compared to women at term not in labor (71). Amniotic fluid concentrations of IL-10 are not different between preterm and term delivery, while cervico-vaginal levels of IL-4 and IL-10 are often below the level of detection using current assays (72, 73). Data regarding the role of maternal plasma IL-10 in mediating PTB remain conflicting. Some studies report decreased plasma IL-10 concentrations with PTB compared to term (1), whereas others have found an association between elevated plasma IL-10 with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction, which may in turn lead to PTB (74). Overall, the positive and negative predictive values of any single specific cytokine or chemokine for PTB is limited (75) although the examination of interactions with a multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis between multiple cytokines within the maternal–fetal compartments, rather than a single cytokine, may better predict the risk of PTB (76).
Prebiotics and Probiotics for Prevention of PTB
Prebiotics are indigestible food ingredients such as dietary fiber, resistant starch, and oligosaccharides. They confer health benefits by “causing significant changes in the composition of the gut microflora with increased and reduced numbers of potentially health-promoting bacteria and potentially harmful species, respectively” (77, 78). The prebiotics galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), and lactulose have been shown to provide substrates for the growth of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, suggesting that they may contribute to the beneficial effects of probiotics. Prebiotics also possess immune-regulatory functions (79–81) and in particular immune-saccharides are known to induce activation of the innate immune system (81). Prebiotic FOS increases the level of IL-27 concentrations in human milk, which may help prevent the onset of allergic disorders in their children (82). There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that prebiotic-containing food may reduce the risk of PTB (83). Of interest, one study reported that dried fruits and garlic that contained antimicrobial and prebiotic compounds were associated with a reduced risk of spontaneous PTB (84).
Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms, which when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (85). A number of meta-analyses of clinical trials with probiotics have confirmed that probiotics are both safe and effective for the treatment and/or prevention of numerous infectious and/or inflammatory diseases (86–89). Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are the most commonly studied probiotics. Supplementation with Bifidobacterium lactis in preterm infants reduces pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridium spp. counts (90). Bifidobacteria are present in large abundance in the intestinal flora, but they can also be detected in the vagina. Probiotic lactobacilli play a potential beneficial role in human reproduction and maintenance of healthy urinary and reproductive tracts (91).
The use of antibiotics to treat BV in non-pregnant and pregnant women remains the method of choice, unchanged in many decades, and still too often ineffective. Metronidazole and clindamycin, by far the most used agents, do not restore vaginal lactobacilli abundance, which may account for relapses in some women; and prolonged use promotes the development of drug resistance (27, 92). The need for new treatment for BV that restores microbiota homeostasis and acidity without undesirable side effects has led investigators and patients to study probiotics. Human studies have provided evidence that probiotic lactobacilli can reduce BV recurrence and increase lactobacilli abundance in the vagina of pregnant and non-pregnant women (93–95). The use of lactobacilli as an adjuvant therapy has also shown promise in lowering BV recurrence rates (92). Indeed, the adjunctive use of L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 with metronidazole has been shown to improve actual cure of BV (96, 97).
Probiotic intervention in pregnancy is generally acceptable with good compliance among pregnant women (98). A recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that the use of probiotics Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium during pregnancy had no effect on the incidence of Cesarean section, birth weight, or gestational age (99).
Oral administration of 109–1011 colony-forming units (cfu) of lactobacilli is the standard dose believed to be required for passage through the intestine and subsequent improvement of gut and vaginal health (27, 93, 100, 101). There are many variables that influence vaginal colonization by lactobacilli including glycogen level, substances used in vaginal washing, the use of antibiotics, and the ability of lactobacilli to produce substances such as hydrogen peroxide (102–104). Bodean et al. (92) reported that oral administration of L. acidophilus and L. bifidus was more effective than the vaginal route in reducing BV occurrence in antibiotic-treated non-pregnant women. However, the probiotic composition of the oral capsule was different from the vaginal capsule (L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus, S. thermophilus, and L. bulgaricus) in that study, and the mechanism seems unclear. Furthermore, the treatment duration was longer for patients who received the oral capsule than those who received vaginal capsules (92). An advantage of the oral route is that it may reduce pathogen ascendance from the rectum to perineum and vagina, while a concern of the intravaginal approach for some women may be the more invasive instillation of microbes.
A number of mechanisms whereby lactobacilli defend against pathogens in the vaginal environment have been described, albeit mostly from in vitro studies. These include the production of antimicrobial substances, competitive exclusion with pathogenic bacteria and fungi, acidification of the vaginal area, and modulation of the immune system (40). Endogenous lactobacilli maintain the vaginal pH <4.5 by metabolizing glycogen secreted by vaginal mucosal epithelia and produce lactic acid, which is a potent microbicide against potential reproductive tract infections (105, 106). The acidic environment of a healthy vagina creates a hostile environment for BV-associated pathogens while favoring lactobacilli growth (105, 107). It may also help to prevent viruses, such as HIV, from infecting the host (108, 109).
The anti-inflammatory property of lactobacilli has been shown to be important in the control of mucosal and systemic inflammation (110). L. rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant (GR-1 SN) enhances IL-10 and colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3) production in mouse macrophages (111). In primary human placental trophoblast cells, GR-1 SN increases IL-10 and CSF3 production via JAK/STAT and MAPK pathways, down-regulates LPS-induced TNFα output through c-Jun-N-terminal kinases (JNKs) inhibition, and increases the expression of the PG metabolizing enzyme PGDH in a sex-dependent fashion (112–114). When administered intra-peritoneally to pregnant mice, GR-1 SN reduces LPS-induced PTB in association with a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines in maternal plasma and the amniotic fluid (115).
The effect of lactobacilli on the immune system and their vaginal colonization ability can be species/strain specific. In the mouse gut, L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus GG exacerbate inflammation and the development of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis while L. paracasei is protective (116). In the human vagina, L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 but not the intestinal probiotic L. rhamnosus GG persist up to 19 days (117). Intra-vaginal instillation of L. rhamnosus GR-1 has been shown to upregulate some antimicrobial activity in premenopausal women (118). A combination of B. bifidum, B. infantis, L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. salivarius, and Lactococcus lactis has been reported to provide a wider antimicrobial spectrum, better stimulation of IL-10 production, and suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to the individual strains (119). A combination of the bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) from the L. rhamnosus L60 and L. fermentum L23 can reduce the growth of group B streptococcal isolates obtained from pregnant women more effectively than each Lactobacillus strain alone (120).
Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) on the cell surface of lactobacilli can also stimulate macrophages to secrete immune-mediators. Improved anti-inflammatory activity in a murine model of colitis in vivo has been observed when LTA is removed or substituted (121–123). L. rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant reduces LPS-induced PTB and associated systemic and intrauterine inflammatory cytokines in pregnant mice (115). The supernatant of lactobacilli also has anti-inflammatory properties in cultured human placental trophoblast cells, decidual cells, monocytes, and macrophages (112–114, 124, 125). In human decidual cells challenged with E. coli, supernatant of L. rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 was found to be more effective than the live bacteria counterpart in the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine production (126). These studies imply that administration of supernatant from lactobacilli may promote desirable effects and represent an alternative for the prevention and/or treatment of inflammatory disorders such as some cases of PTB. The identification of these bioactive metabolite(s) remains to be achieved.
Future clinical studies should consider not only the sample size and design but also the appropriate probiotic strain(s), dose and duration of treatment, and route of administration. Until a sufficiently large study is performed in which the rate of PTB is high enough to note a reduction due to an intervention (127), we can only say that currently, the administration of a few probiotic strains is safe for use in pregnancy and shows promise in conferring health benefits, of which potentially reducing the risk of PTB is one.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The Guest Associate Editor, Jeffrey Keelan, declares that despite being affiliated to the same institution as author, John R. G. Challis, there has been no conflict of interest during the review and handling of this manuscript. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Makhseed M, Raghupathy R, El-Shazly S, Azizieh F, Al-Harmi JA, Al-Azemi MM. Pro-inflammatory maternal cytokine profile in preterm delivery. Am J Reprod Immunol (2003) 49:308–18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.00038.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
2. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet (2008) 371:75–84. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4
3. Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med (2000) 342:1500–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM200005183422007
4. Timmons BC, Reese J, Socrate S, Ehinger N, Paria BC, Milne GL, et al. Prostaglandins are essential for cervical ripening in LPS-mediated preterm birth but not term or antiprogestin-driven preterm ripening. Endocrinology (2014) 155:287–98. doi:10.1210/en.2013-1304
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
5. Shoji T, Yoshida S, Mitsunari M, Miyake N, Tsukihara S, Iwabe T, et al. Involvement of p38 MAP kinase in lipopolysaccharide-induced production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandin E(2) in human choriodecidua. J Reprod Immunol (2007) 75:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2007.05.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
6. Romero R, Durum S, Dinarello CA, Oyarzun E, Hobbins JC, Mitchell MD. Interleukin-1 stimulates prostaglandin biosynthesis by human amnion. Prostaglandins (1989) 37:13–22. doi:10.1016/0090-6980(89)90028-2
7. Challis JR, Lockwood CJ, Myatt L, Norman JE, Strauss JF III, Petraglia F. Inflammation and pregnancy. Reprod Sci (2009) 16:206–15. doi:10.1177/1933719108329095
8. Olgun NS, Reznik SE. The matrix metalloproteases and endothelin-1 in infection-associated preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol Int (2010) 2010:657039. doi:10.1155/2010/657039
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
9. Maymon E, Romero R, Pacora P, Gomez R, Mazor M, Edwin S, et al. A role for the 72 kDa gelatinase (MMP-2) and its inhibitor (TIMP-2) in human parturition, premature rupture of membranes and intraamniotic infection. J Perinat Med (2001) 29:308–16. doi:10.1515/JPM.2001.044
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
10. Fujimoto T, Parry S, Urbanek M, Sammel M, Macones G, Kuivaniemi H, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) promoter influences amnion cell MMP-1 expression and risk for preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes. J Biol Chem (2002) 277:6296–302. doi:10.1074/jbc.M107865200
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
11. Park KH, Chaiworapongsa T, Kim YM, Espinoza J, Yoshimatsu J, Edwin S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 3 in parturition, premature rupture of the membranes, and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. J Perinat Med (2003) 31:12–22. doi:10.1515/JPM.2003.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
12. Tency I. Inflammatory response in maternal serum during preterm labour. Facts Views Vis Obgyn (2014) 6:19–30.
13. Yoon BH, Oh SY, Romero R, Shim SS, Han SY, Park JS, et al. An elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 level at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2001) 185:1162–7. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.117678
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
14. Gotsch F, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Mazaki-Tovi S, Pineles BL, Erez O, et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol (2007) 50:652–83. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31811ebef6
15. Buhimschi CS, Dulay AT, Abdel-Razeq S, Zhao G, Lee S, Hodgson EJ, et al. Fetal inflammatory response in women with proteomic biomarkers characteristic of intra-amniotic inflammation and preterm birth. BJOG (2009) 116:257–67. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01925.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
16. Pacora P, Chaiworapongsa T, Maymon E, Kim YM, Gomez R, Yoon BH, et al. Funisitis and chorionic vasculitis: the histological counterpart of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med (2002) 11:18–25. doi:10.1080/jmf.11.1.18.25
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
17. Pavcnik-Arnol M, Lucovnik M, Kornhauser-Cerar L, Premru-Srsen T, Hojker S, Derganc M, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein as marker of fetal inflammatory response syndrome after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Neonatology (2014) 105:121–7. doi:10.1159/000356735
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
18. Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, Goepfert AR, Faye-Petersen O, Cliver SP, Carlo WA, et al. The Alabama Preterm Birth Study: umbilical cord blood Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis cultures in very preterm newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2008) 198: 43.e1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.033
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
19. Gravett MG, Hitti J, Hess DL, Eschenbach DA. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery: evidence for activation of the fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2000) 182:1404–13. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.106180
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
20. Challis JR, Sloboda DM, Alfaidy N, Lye SJ, Gibb W, Patel FA, et al. Prostaglandins and mechanisms of preterm birth. Reproduction (2002) 124(1):1–17. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1240001
21. Farage M, Maibach H. Lifetime changes in the vulva and vagina. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2006) 273:195–202.1. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0079-x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
22. Spear GT, French AL, Gilbert D, Zariffard MR, Mirmonsef P, Sullivan TH, et al. Human alpha-amylase present in lower-genital-tract mucosal fluid processes glycogen to support vaginal colonization by Lactobacillus. J Infect Dis (2014) 210(7):1019–28. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu231
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
23. Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Nikita L, et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome (2014) 2:4. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4
24. Cauci S, Driussi S, De Santo D, Penacchioni P, Iannicelli T, Lanzafame P, et al. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes in peri- and postmenopausal women. J Clin Microbiol (2002) 40:2147–52. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.6.2147-2152.2002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
25. Gupta S, Kumar N, Singhal N, Kaur R, Manektala U. Vaginal microflora in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. Indian J Pathol Microbiol (2006) 49:457–61.
26. Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Bisanz JE, Hammond JA, McMillan A, Vongsa R, et al. Vaginal microbiome and epithelial gene array in post-menopausal women with moderate to severe dryness. PLoS One (2011) 6:e26602. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026602
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
27. Othman M, Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Probiotics for preventing preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 1:CD005941. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005941.pub2
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
28. Aagaard K, Riehle K, Ma J, Segata N, Mistretta TA, Coarfa C, et al. A metagenomic approach to characterization of the vaginal microbiome signature in pregnancy. PLoS One (2012) 7:e36466. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036466
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
29. Chaban B, Links MG, Jayaprakash TP, Wagner EC, Bourque DK, Lohn Z, et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy Canadian women through the menstrual cycle. Microbiome (2014) 2:23. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-23
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
30. Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, et al. The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG (2011) 118:533–49. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
31. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Claeys G, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M. Culture-independent analysis of vaginal microflora: the unrecognized association of Atopobium vaginae with bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2004) 191:1130–2. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.013
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
32. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med (2005) 353:1899–911. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043802
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
33. Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Fernandes AD, MacPhee R, et al. Microbiome profiling by illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR products. PLoS One (2010) 5:e15406. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015406
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
34. Walther-Antonio MR, Jeraldo P, Berg Miller ME, Yeoman CJ, Nelson KE, Wilson BA, et al. Pregnancy’s stronghold on the vaginal microbiome. PLoS One (2014) 9:e98514. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098514
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
35. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108(Suppl 1):4680–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002611107
36. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Claeys G, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechouttee M, et al. Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol (2009) 9:116. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-116
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
37. Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Bieda J, et al. The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women who subsequently have spontaneous preterm labor and delivery and those with a normal delivery at term. Microbiome (2014) 2:18. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-18
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
38. Schwebke JR, Muzny CA, Josey WE. Role of Gardnerella vaginalis in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual model. J Infect Dis (2014) 210:338–43. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu089
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
39. van de Wijgert JH, Borgdorff H, Verhelst R, Crucitti T, Francis S, Verstraelen H, et al. The vaginal microbiota: what have we learned after a decade of molecular characterization? PLoS One (2014) 9:e105998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105998
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
40. Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, et al. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG (2009) 116:1315–24. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02237.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
41. Reid G, Bocking A. The potential for probiotics to prevent bacterial vaginosis and preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2003) 189:1202–8. doi:10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00495-2
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
42. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol (1991) 29:297–301.
43. Hummelen R, Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Changalucha J, Gloor GB, et al. Deep sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with HIV. PLoS One (2010) 5:e12078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012078
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
44. Jakobsson T, Forsum U. Lactobacillus iners: a marker of changes in the vaginal flora? J Clin Microbiol (2007) 45:3145. doi:10.1128/JCM.00558-07
45. Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D. Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis (2008) 47:33–43. doi:10.1086/588661
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
46. Ugwumadu AH. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2002) 14:115–8. doi:10.1086/588661
47. McDonald HM, Brocklehurst P, Gordon A. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 1:CD000262. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000262.pub3
48. Brocklehurst P, Gordon A, Heatley E, Milan SJ. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 1:CD000262. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000262.pub4
49. Smayevsky J, Canigia LF, Lanza A, Bianchini H. Vaginal microflora associated with bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women: reliability of sialidase detection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol (2001) 9:17–22. doi:10.1155/S1064744901000047
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
50. Aroutcheva A, Ling Z, Faro S. Prevotella bivia as a source of lipopolysaccharide in the vagina. Anaerobe (2008) 14:256–60. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.08.002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
51. Mitchell C, Marrazzo J. Bacterial vaginosis and the cervicovaginal immune response. Am J Reprod Immunol (2014) 71:555–63. doi:10.1111/aji.12264
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
52. Macklaim JM, Fernandes AD, Di Bella JM, Hammond JA, Reid G, Gloor GB. Comparative meta RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by Lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis. Microbiome (2013) 1:12. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-12
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
53. Wen A, Srinivasan U, Goldberg D, Owen J, Marrs CF, Misra D, et al. Selected vaginal bacteria and risk of preterm birth: an ecological perspective. J Infect Dis (2014) 209:1087–94. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit632
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
54. Nelson DB, Hanlon A, Nachamkin I, Haggerty C, Mastrogiannis DS, Liu C, et al. Early pregnancy changes in bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria and preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol (2014) 28:88–96. doi:10.1111/ppe.12106
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
55. Hyman RW, Fukushima M, Jiang H, Fung E, Rand L, Johnson B, et al. Diversity of the vaginal microbiome correlates with preterm birth. Reprod Sci (2014) 21:32–40. doi:10.1177/1933719113488838
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
56. Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J, et al. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6:237ra265. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
57. Wilczynski JR. Th1/Th2 cytokines balance – yin and yang of reproductive immunology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2005) 122:136–43. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.008
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
58. Esplin MS, Peltier MR, Hamblin S, Smith S, Fausett MB, Dildy GA, et al. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 expression is increased in human gestational tissues during term and preterm labor. Placenta (2005) 26:661–71. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2004.09.012
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
59. Hamilton SA, Tower CL, Jones RL. Identification of chemokines associated with the recruitment of decidual leukocytes in human labour: potential novel targets for preterm labour. PLoS One (2013) 8:e56946. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056946
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
60. El-Bastawissi AY, Williams MA, Riley DE, Hitti J, Krieger JN. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and preterm delivery: a review. Obstet Gynecol (2000) 95:1056–64. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00875-9
61. Hitti J, Hillier SL, Agnew KJ, Krohn MA, Reisner DP, Eschenbach DA, et al. Vaginal indicators of amniotic fluid infection in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol (2001) 97:211–9. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01146-7
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
62. Jun JK, Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim M, Moon JB, Ki SH, et al. Interleukin 6 determinations in cervical fluid have diagnostic and prognostic value in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2000) 183:868–73. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.109034
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
63. Coultrip LL, Lien JM, Gomez R, Kapernick P, Khoury A, Grossman JH. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 determination in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1994) 171:901–11. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70057-5
64. von Minckwitz G, Grischke EM, Schwab S, Hettinger S, Loibl S, Aulmann M, et al. Predictive value of serum interleukin-6 and -8 levels in preterm labor or rupture of the membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2000) 79:667–72. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079008667.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
65. Holst RM, Hagberg H, Wennerholm UB, Skogstrand K, Thorsen P, Jacobsson B. Prediction of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in women with preterm labour: analysis of multiple proteins in amniotic and cervical fluids. BJOG (2011) 118:240–9. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02765.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
66. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim JC, Kim YM, Blackwell SC, Yoon BH, et al. Evidence for fetal involvement in the pathologic process of clinical chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2002) 186:1178–82. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.124042
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
67. Holst RM, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Jacobsson B. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in cervical fluid in a population of Swedish women in preterm labor: relationship to microbial invasion of the amniotic fluid, intra-amniotic inflammation, and preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2005) 84:551–7. doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00708.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
68. Torbe A, Czajka R, Kordek A, Rzepka R, Kwiatkowski S, Rudnicki J. Maternal serum proinflammatory cytokines in preterm labor with intact membranes: neonatal outcome and histological associations. Eur Cytokine Netw (2007) 18:102–7. doi:10.1684/ecn.2007.0092
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
69. Bowen JM, Chamley L, Mitchell MD, Keelan JA. Cytokines of the placenta and extra placental membranes: biosynthesis, secretion and roles in establishment of pregnancy in women. Placenta (2002) 23:239–56. doi:10.1053/plac.2001.0781
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
70. Keelan JA, Blumenstein M, Helliwell RJ, Sato TA, Marvin KW, Mitchell MD. Cytokines, prostaglandins and parturition – a review. Placenta (2003) 24(Suppl A):S33–46. doi:10.1053/plac.2002.0948
71. Hanna N, Bonifacio L, Weinberger B, Reddy P, Murphy S, Romero R, et al. Evidence for interleukin 10-mediated inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin production in preterm human placenta. Am J Reprod Immunol (2006) 55:19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00342.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
72. Puchner K, Iavazzo C, Gourgiotis D, Boutsikou M, Baka S, Hassiakos D, et al. Mid-trimester amniotic fluid interleukins (IL-1beta, IL-10 and IL-18) as possible predictors of preterm delivery. In vivo (2011) 25:141–8.
73. Vogel I, Goepfert AR, Thorsen P, Skogstrand K, Hougaard DM, Curry AH, et al. Early second-trimester inflammatory markers and short cervical length and the risk of recurrent preterm birth. J Reprod Immunol (2007) 75:133–40. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2007.02.008
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
74. Ferguson KK, McElrath TF, Chen YH, Mukherjee B, Meeker JD. Longitudinal profiling of inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein during uncomplicated and preterm pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol (2014) 72:326–36. doi:10.1111/aji.12265
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
75. Menon R, Torloni MR, Voltolini C, Torricelli M, Merialdi M, Betran AP, et al. Biomarkers of spontaneous preterm birth: an overview of the literature in the last four decades. Reprod Sci (2011) 18:1046–70. doi:10.1177/1933719111415548
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
76. Bhat G, Williams SM, Saade GR, Menon R. Biomarker interactions are better predictors of spontaneous preterm birth. Reprod Sci (2014) 21:340–50. doi:10.1177/1933719113497285
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
77. Gibson GR, Probert HM, Loo JV, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev (2004) 17:259–75. doi:10.1079/NRR200479
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
79. Watson D, O’Connell Motherway M, Schoterman MH, van Neerven RJ, Nauta A, van Watson D, et al. Selective carbohydrate utilization by lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. J Appl Microbiol (2013) 114:1132–46. doi:10.1111/jam.12105
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
80. Ben XM, Li J, Feng ZT, Shi SY, Lu YD, Chen R, et al. Low level of galacto-oligosaccharide in infant formula stimulates growth of intestinal bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli. World J Gastroenterol (2008) 14:6564–8. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.6564
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
81. Song SK, Beck BR, Kim D, Park J, Kim J, Kim HD, et al. Prebiotics as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review. Fish Shellfish Immunol (2014) 40:40–8. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2014.06.016
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
82. Kubota T, Shimojo N, Nonaka K, Yamashita M, Ohara O, Igoshi Y, et al. Prebiotic consumption in pregnant and lactating women increases IL-27 expression in human milk. Br J Nutr (2014) 111:625–32. doi:10.1017/S0007114513003036
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
83. Otsuki K, Tokunaka M, Oba T, Nakamura M, Shirato N, Okai T. Administration of oral and vaginal prebiotic lactoferrin for a woman with a refractory vaginitis recurring preterm delivery: appearance of lactobacillus in vaginal flora followed by term delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res (2014) 40:583–5. doi:10.1111/jog.12171
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
84. Myhre R, Brantsaeter AL, Myking S, Eggesbo M, Meltzer HM, Haugen M, et al. Intakes of garlic and dried fruits are associated with lower risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. J Nutr (2013) 143:1100–8. doi:10.3945/jn.112.173229
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
85. FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food. London, ON (2001). Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0512e/a0512e00.pdf.
86. Chen AC, Chung MY, Chang JH, Lin HC. Pathogenesis implication for necrotizing enterocolitis prevention in preterm very-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr (2014) 58:7–11. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a7dc74
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
87. Goldenberg JZ, Ma SS, Saxton JD, Martzen MR, Vandvik PO, Thorlund K, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 5:CD006095. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub3
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
88. Yang Y, Guo Y, Kan Q, Zhou XG, Zhou XY, Li Y, et al. A meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Braz J Med Biol Res (2014) 47:804–10. doi:10.1590/1414-431X20143857
89. Grin PM, Kowalewska PM, Alhazzan W, Fox-Robichaud AE. Lactobacillus for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections in women: meta-analysis. Can J Urol (2013) 20:6607–14.
90. Szajewska H, Guandalini S, Morelli L, Van Goudoever JB, Walker A. Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis supplementation in preterm infants: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr (2010) 51:203–9. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181dc0d93
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
91. Reid G, Brigidi P, Burton JP, Contractor N, Duncan S, Fargier E, et al. Microbes central to human reproduction. Am J Reprod Immunol (2014) 73(1):1–11. doi:10.1111/aji.12319
92. Bodean O, Munteanu O, Cirstoiu C, Secara D, Cirstoiu M. Probiotics-a helpful additional therapy for bacterial vaginosis. J Med Life (2013) 6:434–6.
93. Homayouni A, Bastani P, Ziyadi S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Ghalibaf M, Mortazavian AM, et al. Effects of probiotics on the recurrence of bacterial vaginosis: a review. J Low Genit Tract Dis (2014) 18:79–86. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e31829156ec
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
94. Nishijima K, Shukunami K, Kotsuji F. Probiotics affects vaginal flora in pregnant women, suggesting the possibility of preventing preterm labor. J Clin Gastroenterol (2005) 39:447–8. doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000159269.58480.4b
95. Reid G, Charbonneau D, Erb J, Kochanowski B, Beuerman D, Poehner R, et al. Oral use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. fermentum RC-14 significantly alters vaginal flora: randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 64 healthy women. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol (2003) 35:131–4. doi:10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00465-0
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
96. Martinez RC, Franceschini SA, Patta MC, Quintana SM, Gomes BC, De Martinis EC, et al. Improved cure of bacterial vaginosis with single dose of tinidazole (2 g), Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1, and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Can J Microbiol (2009) 55:133–8. doi:10.1139/w08-102
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
97. Anukam K, Osazuwa E, Ahonkhai I, Ngwu M, Osemene G, Bruce AW, et al. Augmentation of antimicrobial metronidazole therapy of bacterial vaginosis with oral probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Microbes Infect (2006) 8:1450–4. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2006.01.003
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
98. Lindsay KL, Brennan L, McAuliffe FM. Acceptability of and compliance with a probiotic capsule intervention in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet (2014) 125:279–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.01.004
99. Dugoua JJ, Machado M, Zhu X, Chen X, Koren G, Einarson TR, et al. Probiotic safety in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces spp. J Obstet Gynaecol Can (2009) 31:542–52.
100. Reid G, Beuerman D, Heinemann C, Bruce AW. Probiotic Lactobacillus dose required to restore and maintain a normal vaginal flora. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol (2001) 32:37–41. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2001.tb00531.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
101. Morelli L, Zonenenschain D, Del Piano M, Cognein P. Utilization of the intestinal tract as a delivery system for urogenital probiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol (2004) 38(6 Suppl):S107–10. doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000128938.32835.98
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
102. Vallor AC, Antonio MA, Hawes SE, Hillier SL. Factors associated with acquisition of, or persistent colonization by, vaginal lactobacilli: role of hydrogen peroxide production. J Infect Dis (2001) 184(11):1431–6. doi:10.1086/324445
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
103. Baeten JM, Hassan WM, Chohan V, Richardson BA, Mandaliya K, Ndinya-Achola JO, et al. Prospective study of correlates of vaginal Lactobacillus colonisation among high-risk HIV-1 seronegative women. Sex Transm Infect (2009) 85(5):348–53. doi:10.1136/sti.2008.035451
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
104. Mirmonsef P, Hotton AL, Gilbert D, Burgad D, Landay A, Weber KM, et al. Free glycogen in vaginal fluids is associated with Lactobacillus colonization and low vaginal pH. PLoS One (2014) 9(7):e102467. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102467
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
105. Donati L, Di Vico A, Nucci M, Quagliozzi L, Spagnuolo T, Labianca A, et al. Vaginal microbial flora and outcome of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2010) 281:589–600. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1318-3
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
106. O’Hanlon DE, Moench TR, Cone RA. Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota. PLoS One (2013) 8:e80074. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1318-3
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
107. Borges S, Silva J, Teixeira P. The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2014) 289:479–89. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3064-9
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
108. Cadieux P, Burton J, Gardiner G, Braunstein I, Bruce AW, Kang CY, et al. Lactobacillus strains and vaginal ecology. JAMA (2002) 287:1940–1. doi:10.1001/jama.287.15.1935
109. Petrova MI, van den Broek M, Balzarini J, Vanderleyden J, Lebeer S. Vaginal microbiota and its role in HIV transmission and infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev (2013) 37:762–92. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12029
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
110. Kemgang TS, Kapila S, Shanmugam VP, Kapila R. Cross-talk between probiotic lactobacilli and host immune system. J Appl Microbiol (2014) 117:303–19. doi:10.1111/jam.12521
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
111. Kim SO, Sheikh HI, Ha SD, Martins A, Reid G. G-CSF-mediated inhibition of JNK is a key mechanism for Lactobacillus rhamnosus-induced suppression of TNF production in macrophages. Cell Microbiol (2006) 8:1958–71. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00763.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
112. Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 stimulates colony-stimulating factor 3 (granulocyte) (CSF3) output in placental trophoblast cells in a fetal sex-dependent manner. Biol Reprod (2011) 84:18–25. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.085167
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
113. Yeganegi M, Leung CG, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 induced IL-10 production in human placental trophoblast cells involves activation of JAK/STAT and MAPK pathways. Reprod Sci (2010) 17:1043–51. doi:10.1177/1933719110377237
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
114. Yeganegi M, Watson CS, Martins A, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant and fetal sex on lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine and prostaglandin-regulating enzymes in human placental trophoblast cells: implications for treatment of bacterial vaginosis and prevention of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2009) 200(532):e531–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.032
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
115. Yang S, Li W, Challis JR, Reid G, Kim SO, Bocking AD. Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced preterm birth and reduces inflammation in pregnant CD-1 mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2014) 211: 44.e1–44.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.029
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
116. Mileti E, Matteoli G, Iliev ID, Rescigno M. Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy. PLoS One (2009) 4:e7056. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007056
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
117. Gardiner GE, Heinemann C, Bruce AW, Beuerman D, Reid G. Persistence of Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 but not L. rhamnosus GG in the human vagina as demonstrated by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2002) 9:92–6. doi:10.1128/CDLI.9.1.92-96.2002
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
118. Kirjavainen PK, Laine RM, Carter D, Hammond J-A, Reid G. Expression of anti microbial defense factors in vaginal mucosa following exposure of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1. Int J Probiotics (2008) 3:99–106.
119. Timmerman HM, Niers LE, Ridwan BU, Koning CJ, Mulder L, Akkemans LM, et al. Design of a multispecies probiotic mixture to prevent infectious complications in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr (2007) 26:450–9. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2007.04.008
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
120. Ruiz FO, Gerbaldo G, Garcia MJ, Giordano W, Pascual L, Barberis IL, et al. Synergistic effect between two bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances produced by lactobacilli strains with inhibitory activity for Streptococcus agalactiae. Curr Microbiol (2012) 64:349–56. doi:10.1007/s00284-011-0077-0
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
121. Grangette C, Nutten S, Palumbo E, Morath S, Hermann C, Dewulf J, et al. Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102:10321–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504084102
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
122. Claes IJ, Lebeer S, Shen C, Verhoeven TL, Dilissen E, De Hertogh G, et al. Impact of lipoteichoic acid modification on the performance of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in experimental colitis. Clin Exp Immunol (2010) 162:306–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04228.x
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
123. Mohamadzadeh M, Pfeiler EA, Brown JB, Zadeh M, Gramarossa M, Managlia E, et al. Regulation of induced colonic inflammation by Lactobacillus acidophilus deficient in lipoteichoic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108(Suppl 1):4623–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005066107
124. Li W, Yang S, Kim SO, Reid G, Challis JR, Bocking AD. Lipopolysaccharide-induced profiles of cytokine, chemokine, and growth factors produced by human decidual cells are altered by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant. Reprod Sci (2014) 21:939–47. doi:10.1177/1933719113519171
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
125. Lin YP, Thibodeaux CH, Pena JA, Ferry GD, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri suppress proinflammatory cytokines via c-Jun. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2008) 14:1068–83. doi:10.1002/ibd.20448
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
126. Bermudez-Brito M, Munoz-Quezada S, Gomez-Llorente C, Romero F, Gil A. Lactobacillus rhamnosus and its cell-free culture supernatant differentially modulate inflammatory biomarkers in Escherichia coli-challenged human dendritic cells. Br J Nutr (2014) 111:1727–37. doi:10.1017/S0007114513004303
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
127. Krauss-Silva L, Moreira ME, Alves MB, Braga A, Camacho KG, Batista MR, et al. A randomised controlled trial of probiotics for the prevention of spontaneous preterm delivery associated with bacterial vaginosis: preliminary results. Trials (2011) 12:239. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-239
Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Keywords: probiotics, preterm birth, infection and inflammation, cytokines, vaginal microbiome, bacterial vaginosis
Citation: Yang S, Reid G, Challis JRG, Kim SO, Gloor GB and Bocking AD (2015) Is there a role for probiotics in the prevention of preterm birth? Front. Immunol. 6:62. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00062
Received: 05 November 2014; Paper pending published: 08 December 2014;
Accepted: 01 February 2015; Published online: 17 February 2015.
Edited by:
Jeffrey A. Keelan, The University of Western Australia, AustraliaReviewed by:
Christopher John Griffin, Government of Western Australia, AustraliaAnna Maria Viola Forsberg, Linköping University, Sweden
Lisa C. Hanson, Marquette University, USA
Copyright: © 2015 Yang, Reid, Challis, Kim, Gloor and Bocking. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alan D. Bocking, University of Toronto, c/o Mount Sinai Hospital, 60 Murray Street, Box 43, 6th Floor, Room 6-1017, Toronto, ON M5T 1X5, Canada e-mail: abocking@mtsinai.on.ca