- 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 2California State University, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- 3Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Digital Media and Social Connection in the Lives of Children, Adolescents and Families
Digital and mobile media—including visual social media—are impacting children's and young people's sense of connection, belonging, and wellbeing. While the call for this Research Topic was first published in early 2020, the questions we raised took on greater significance with the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, the pandemic led to increased reliance on digital media given shelter in place and social distancing that greatly limited face-to-face interactions. Accordingly, it is even more critical to understand whether and how these media support or detract from social connection.
As researchers studying youth and media, we were particularly concerned with how the constantly evolving changes in technology (Subrahmanyam and Michikyan, in press) may lead to changes in digital media effects both positive and negative, during youth development (Uhls et al., 2017). For the purposes of this Research Topic, the term digital media was conceptualized to include the internet (e.g., websites, online forums and communities, and video and image sharing platforms), communication applications/platforms (e.g., social media and messaging apps), and electronic games. More broadly digital media are also referred to as interactive media following England and Finney (2002) definition of interactive media as the integration of digital media including combinations of electronic text, graphics, moving images, and sound, into a structured digital computerized environment that allows people to interact with the data for appropriate purposes” (see p. 2).
This Research Topic, “Digital Media and Social Connection in the lives of children, adolescents and families” brings together 14 papers including 11 original research studies, two brief research reports and one perspective article. Taken together, this body of work addresses the implications of a range of digital media technologies and constructs among an array of youth from diverse parts of the world. The majority of the papers focus on early to late adolescents as well as young/emerging adults, while two papers also focus on parents. Reflecting the broad ways that digital and mobile media are integrated into our daily lives, examined contexts included social media, educational settings, Internet cafes, messaging apps, audio visual content (e.g., streaming and YouTube), and mobile applications. The papers also showcase a variety of methods including Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), large scale surveys, in depth interviews, content analysis of comments and more. Overall, the papers uncover nuanced effects which differed in myriad ways depending on mechanisms such as what kind of digital media (social media vs. messaging apps), frequency and motivation of communication (e.g., high texters vs. low texters) and individual characteristics.
Although there is a proliferating literature on the ways children and young people use digital technology, the global North tends to lead these discussions. A strength of this collection is that it canvasses insights from diverse parts of the world (e.g., Italy, Argentina, Indonesia, UK, Taiwan, India) helping to redress the imbalance in perspectives from different cultural contexts. Keep in mind one third of all internet users around the world is a child—a number that is expanding rapidly. And nine tenths of the world's children live in the global South—so it's critical that, as those children come online, we are documenting and responding to their lived experiences—particularly given that they come online primarily via mobile phone, and without the necessary structures of adult support around them that children in the global North often have.
Taken together the papers highlight the need to go beyond categorizing media as monolithic with simple effects (Haidt and Twenge, 2021) and to instead attempt to tease apart individual differences, definitions of wellbeing and connection, different affordances and developmental stages (Moreno and Uhls, 2019).
Author Contributions
YU, KS, and AT equally contributed to the editorial process. YU organized the group and all contributed to requesting submissions, reviewing, and editing manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
England, E., and Finney, A. (2002). Managing Multimedia: Project Management for Web and Convergent Media. Editorial Dunken.
Haidt, J., and Twenge, J. M. (2021). Opinion. The New York Times. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/31/opinion/smartphone-iphone-social-media-isolation.html
Moreno, M. A., and Uhls, Y. T. (2019). Applying an affordances approach and a developmental lens to approach adolescent social media use. Digit. Health doi: 10.1177/2055207619826678
Subrahmanyam, K., and Michikyan, M. (in press). “Methodological conceptual issues in digital media research,” in Handbook of Adolescent Digital Media Use Mental Health, eds J. Nesi, E. H. Telzer, M. J. Prinstein. Cambridge University Press.
Keywords: digital media, social media, connection, wellbeing, adolescence, family
Citation: Uhls YT, Subrahmanyam K and Third A (2022) Editorial: Digital Media and Social Connection in the Lives of Children, Adolescents and Families. Front. Hum. Dyn. 4:829468. doi: 10.3389/fhumd.2022.829468
Received: 05 December 2021; Accepted: 08 February 2022;
Published: 04 April 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Peter David Tolmie, University of Siegen, Germany
Copyright © 2022 Uhls, Subrahmanyam and Third. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yalda T. Uhls, eWFsZGF0dWhscyYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==