Using open-science workflow tools to produce SCEC CyberShake physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard models
CORRECTION article
Corrigendum: Using open-science workflow tools to produce SCEC CyberShake physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard models
Provisionally accepted- 1 Statewide California Earthquake Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
- 2 Earthquake Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA, United States
- 3 Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States
- 4 San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
- 5 Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, United States
- 6 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, United States
- 7 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Keywords: scientific workflows, Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, High performance computing, Seismic simulations, Distributed Computing, computational modeling
Received: 16 Sep 2024; Accepted: 17 Sep 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Callaghan, Maechling, Silva, Su, Milner, Graves, Olsen, Cui, Vahi, Kottke, Goulet, Deelman, Jordan and Ben-Zion. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Scott Callaghan, Statewide California Earthquake Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.