Editorial: Stillbirths in low-middle income countries: challenges & experiences

Editorial on the Research Topic
Stillbirths in low-middle income countries: challenges & experiences

Almost half of the 2 million stillbirths that occur globally each year are thought to be preventable (1). The burden of stillbirths falls predominantly on low- and middle-income countries, where 84% occur. The collection of papers in this Research Topic highlights potential interventions to end preventable stillbirths.

Prevention of stillbirth requires understanding of both direct and indirect causes, as well as the health systems and wider contexts within which women and birthing people deliver their babies. Improving skilled birth attendance, for example, without equipping families first with the necessary tools to plan pregnancies and seek pre-conception care, will have only a partial impact.

Efforts to reduce stillbirth incidence are often hampered by poor recording of when stillbirths are occurring and why, an issue clearly highlighted by Milton et al. in their observational study of stillbirth determinants in Kano, Nigeria. Their study found surprisingly mixed data between the two facilities surveyed; higher household income for example was associated with increased likelihood of stillbirth in one facility, and reduced likelihood in the other. The poorly understood causality of stillbirth in specific contexts is further highlighted by Swarray-Deen et al. observational study of healthcare workers’ awareness of perinatal autopsy in Ethiopia. They demonstrate a low uptake of freely-available postmortem investigation, associated with lack of training and awareness among healthcare professionals. Investigation of stillbirths within resources is a key principle (RESPECT) of care (2), and may help to reduce the stigma attached to its occurrence in some settings (3).

Globally, around 40% of stillbirths occur intrapartum (1). In Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand, only 6% of stillbirths occur during labour but this figure is higher in all other regions, increasing up to 49% in sub-Saharan Africa (1). Most stillbirths during labour are thought to be preventable with high-quality intrapartum care, including early detection of complications and escalation of care as appropriate. The low-cost sensor glove pioneered by Jaufuraully et al. could address one important cause of stillbirth; undetected obstructed labour. The glove contains a sensor on the tip of the index finger, which facilitates identification of the fetal cranial sutures, and therefore the position of the anterior and posterior fontanelles of the fetal skull. While it is currently in the early stages of development, this device has the potential to train birth attendants, upskilling them with minimal additional time demands, essential in many health systems with low proportions of healthcare workers per capita. In a pilot study (Jaufuraully personal communication), medical students achieved very high levels of accuracy in diagnosing malposition with the glove.

Beyond the immediate period of pregnancy and loss, pre-conception and inter-conception advice is often neglected when addressing stillbirth, despite being a key principle of care (RESPECT—(2)). Baynes et al. illustrate the complexity of improving family planning provision in low- and middle-income countries, and suggest how implementation science can be used to address some of these barriers.

Underlying all of these improvements is a need for greater training of healthcare professionals. All studies within this series echo the same call; efforts to reduce stillbirths must be targeted and informed by locally-relevant evidence. In addition to stillbirth prevention, future research is also required to expand the provision of bereavement care that is exemplary, supportive, compassionate, and relevant to local settings.

Author contributions

BA wrote the first draft, edited by DS, and approved by NA. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. You D, Hug L, Mishra A, Blencowe H, Moran A. A neglected tragedy the global burden of stillbirths report of the UN inter-agency group for child mortality estimation, 2020. New York; (2020). Available at: https://www.unicef.org/media/84851/file/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf (Accessed March 26, 2021).

2. Shakespeare C, Merriel A, Bakhbakhi D, Blencowe H, Boyle FM, Flenady V, et al. The RESPECT study for consensus on global bereavement care after stillbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. (2020) 149(2):137–47. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shakespeare C, Merriel A, Bakhbakhi D, Baneszova R, Barnard K, Lynch M, et al. Parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of care after stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-summary. BJOG. (2019) 126(1):12–21. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar