Shalini Mittal
Tushar Singh- 1Amity Institute of Behavioural and Allied Sciences, Amity University, Lucknow, India
- 2Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Purpose: Quarantine is necessary to reduce the community spread of the Coronavirus disease, but it also has serious psychological and socially disruptive consequences. This is known as the quarantine paradox that also includes a surge in the cases of gender-based violence. However, there exists a clear gap of rigorous literature exploring the issue. Hence, the current paper attempts to understand gender-based violence as an aspect of the COVID-19 lockdown. It reviews the pattern of rise in gender violence cases and the resultant psychological and social issues and attempts to create awareness by initiating a discourse urging for change in the response towards the victims of gender-based violence. The paper further attempts to suggest measures to mitigate the issues arising out of gender violence during quarantine.
Method: The current paper reviews the literature on the rise of gender-based violence in the times of current and past pandemics. The paper also reviews the published reports in scientific as well as mass media literatures focusing on the rise of gender-based violence during the imposed lockdown, its consequences, and the measures taken by the governments to tackle the issue.
Results: The present review reveals that similar to the previous pandemics and epidemics, there has been an alarming rise in the incidents of gender-based violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present review further reveals various other risk factors that have been found attributive to the surge of gender-based violence such as economic insecurity and alcohol consumption. The results of the review indicate that despite its global prevalence, gender-based violence has been one of the most neglected outcomes of pandemics. Moreover, the legislatures and services available for such victims are often inadequate and, thus, worsening their situation.
Conclusion: Pandemic situations have been found to be associated with advancements in the medical field. However, a part and parcel of this situation is the age-old practice of quarantine that has several negative outcomes. This also includes a surge in gender-based violence that raises serious concerns about the safety of women. As the legislatures provided and measures taken by the governments are falling short in dealing with the issue, a number of non-government organizations are stepping up to provide necessary services to these victims.
Pandemic and Gender-Based Violence
Quarantine has been an effective measure of controlling infection since the 14th century. The medieval societies were able to establish a link between the emergence of symptoms and the duration of time. The origin of the term is rooted in the health practice related to plague back in 1377 AD when ships were isolated for 30 days and land travelers for 40 days in the sea port of Ragusa (1). However, the earliest record of quarantine can be traced back to 532 AD (2). Since then, the practice of quarantine has been utilized to reduce the spread of contagious diseases. With the declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, there is a mounting pressure on the governments to take measures to reduce the community spread of the disease. Hence, in the absence of a vaccine or effective treatment, going into quarantine for varying periods of time is being adopted as an option by most countries. This has led to a drastic alteration in the day-to-day lifestyle of the individuals. Most of the work is being done from home, and efforts are being made to maintain social distance. These measures are crucial to the protection of healthcare systems. However, just like one coin has two sides, the positive efforts to tackle COVID-19 have negative consequences associated with them. These negative consequences include the risk of losing jobs, economic vulnerabilities, and psychological health issues resulting from isolation, loneliness, and uncertainty, among others. This can be regarded as the quarantine paradox. History has witnessed the weakening of the states in the face of pandemics and outbreaks. The Antonine plague of 161 AD had economically weakened the Roman Empire (3). The Byzantine empire too had suffered weakening of the economic infrastructure during the Justinian plague (4). Past researches indicate that the risk of serious psychological consequences increases with the increase in the duration of the quarantine (5). According to Hawryluck et al. (6) and Reynolds et al. (7), a longer duration of quarantine was found to be associated with increased symptoms of PTSD. Lee et al. (8) reported that the risk of developing PTSD symptoms persisted despite home quarantine. Another downside of quarantine is the increase in cases of gender-based violence that is frequently ignored (9). Gender-based violence is a form of violence targeting a person based on the gender of an individual. It is a complex phenomenon that includes combinations of sexual, physical, and emotional violence and neglect or deprivation (10). CEDAW (Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women) has defined gender-based violence as a form of violence that disproportionately affects women. Some common forms of gender-based violence include sexual violence, violence against women, domestic violence, and harmful traditional practices, such as female genital mutilation. For the present paper, the term gender-based violence has been used to denote different aspects of domestic violence against women.
According to an article published in a national newspaper of India, The Hindu, the National Commission for Women (NCW) recorded a twofold rise in the cases of gender violence (11). Several researches indicate a rise in family violence and sexual violence during and after any large crisis or disaster [e.g., (12, 13)].
Relation Between Gender-Based Violence and Crisis Situations
Violence has generally been found to increase in the face of pandemics. For instance, Rose (14) reported an erosion of social norms and increase in violence in Bologna, Italy, in the context of plague and natural disaster. According to UNFPA (15), pandemics often lead to breakdowns of social infrastructures thus compounding the already existing weaknesses and conflicts. As a result, the existing gender inequality is worsened by the pandemic situations. It also increases the exposure of children and women to harassment and sexual violence when they try to procure necessities such as water, food, and firewood. Several researches report that gender-based violence is more prevalent in HIV hyper-endemic countries [e.g., (10, 16)]. Researchers have observed a link between the prevalence of HIV epidemic and gender-based violence in India as well (17, 18). A report about rapid gender analysis on COVID-19 by CARE and International Rescue had expected gender-based violence to rise amid pandemic and quarantines. Hence, the report had also recommended to prepare and build on existing services for the victims of gender-based violence. The report further emphasized on the need to strengthen online services to provide psychological support and legal aid services (19). According to Menendez et al. (20), often women do not have rights over their sexual choices. Consequently, they experience sexual violence and the risk of exposure to the virus through the male carrier. Okur (21) emphasized that sexual and gender-based violence increases during crisis situations due to breakdown in law. Thus, the victims often do not receive the adequate support, and the perpetrators get exempted from punishment. Also, according to the WHO global ethics unit (22), gender roles affect all aspects of an endemic including interpersonal violence. It also emphasized the need of various services to minimize the risk of violence when people are quarantined at home or in institutions. Hence, the present research shall focus on the gender-based violence, because despite being a global phenomenon, it is highly underreported due to stigma and social pressures. Moreover, there is a lack of studies focusing on the prevalence of gender-based violence during disasters. Consequently, those responding to disasters are often not aware of the possibility of surge in the cases of gender-based violence. Therefore, they often do not prepare to deal with, thereby making the situation worse. In fact, according to John et al. (23), these are the lessons never learnt. Therefore, we have a limited understanding toward how the victims of gender-based violence respond to the situation of the current pandemic. Hence, the present research reviews the linkages between gender violence and pandemic and also attempts to identify the potential policy responses to moderate the issue.
In the past, crises have been linked with a surge in cases of gender violence (24–27). A surge in intimate partner violence was observed during other disasters such as Earthquake in Haiti in 2007, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and Eruption of Mount Saint Helens in the 1980s due to unemployment, family, and other stressors (28). Even during the South Asian Tsunami of 2004, a surge in gender-based violence was observed. Fisher (29) emphasized that in the aftermath of Tsunami, several incidents of violence against women and sexual assault were reported in Sri Lanka. According to researchers, pandemics cannot be considered an exception to this (9). Sikira and Urassa (30) reported an increase in wife battering in the face of the HIV pandemic due to suspicion of extramarital affairs. Recent outbreaks such as Ebola, Cholera, Zika, and Nipah have also led to an increase in the cases of domestic violence (31). During the Ebola virus outbreak, women and girls were especially vulnerable to violence because of the inability to escape their abuser. Moreover, the victims of violence were not recognized and were often left unattended (32). According to Yasmin (33), cases of rape, violence against women, and sexual assault also increased during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
There are a number of reasons for such increase in gender violence cases. Arthur and Clark (34) also identified economic dependence as a cause for domestic violence. During quarantine, as more women were in informal jobs and got laid off, this led to them experiencing a greater impact as they became economically dependent on their male counterparts. According to Alon et al. (35), lesser women than men are in telecommutable jobs, thus making it difficult for them to adapt to the changing conditions. This increased economic dependence not only increases their risk of gender-based violence but also makes it difficult to leave their perpetrators. Pandemics like influenza, swine flu, and SARS have been found to result in psychological issues such as anxiety, substance abuse, PTSD, and sleep disturbances that often tend to continue even after the pandemic (36, 37). According to a research by Zhang et al. (38), increased prevalence of depressive symptoms could be observed among COVID 19 patients. A significant rise in anxiety levels of the COVID-19 patients as well as the general public was reported by the findings of the study. In return, these mental health issues and related factors such as alcoholism tend to lead to a rise in gender-based violence (39–42). Several researchers have reported that the sales of alcohol have skyrocketed during pandemic [e.g., (43, 44)]. Polakovic (43) reported a rise of 55% in the consumption of alcoholic beverages in the United States. Evidence also suggests that increase in male migration reduces gender violence due to reduced exposure to the potential perpetrators (45). When under quarantine, women individuals are in close proximity to the male members with limited to no freedom to go out, thus leading to an increase in gender violence at home. Pandemics also increase economic vulnerabilities because of the rise in unemployment, or, in the risk of unemployment. Several studies link economic insecurities to increased gender-based violence. Economic insecurity has been found to be linked to adopting poor coping strategies that are inclusive of substance abuse (46–48). These, in turn, have been found to be associated with various forms of gender-based violence (49). However, interesting gender differences can be observed in this context. Bhalotra et al. (50) reported that increase in male unemployment was associated with increase in interpersonal violence against women where an increase in women unemployment was associated with a decrease in violence against them. According to Schneider et al. (51), such an outcome could be because of male backlash resulting from feelings of emasculation and inadequacy at not being able to serve the role of a breadwinner of the family. According to Bradbury-Jones and Isham (52), it could also be because of the distorted power dynamics at home resulting in abuse and gender violence that escapes the scrutiny of anyone from outside. The problem of gender-based violence during the pandemic further worsens because the police are unable to tackle the issue of gender-based violence. According to a report, gender-based violence in Liberia could have also increased because the police were overwhelmed and unable to defend the victims (53). Richards (54) reported that economic strain, substance abuse, and isolation all tend to increase the risk of domestic violence. Based on the above literature review, it is evident that understanding of gender violence is a key priority in order to achieve gender equality globally.
Past researches have established a strong link between different forms of gender-based violence and psychological issues. Thus, it is all the more important to tackle the issue of rising gender-based violence in the face of COVID-19. It has been reported that women who experience one form of gender-based violence are more likely to experience other forms of gender violence (55). According to Campbell (56), intimate partner violence is associated with PTSD, depression, chronic pain, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Woods (57) reported that PTSD symptoms could be observed in both abused and post-abused women. Jackson et al. (58) established a link between traumatic brain injury and woman battering. They reported that the frequency of being hit in the head was significantly correlated with severe cognitive symptoms. Walker (59) reported that victims of domestic violence experience a sequelae of psychological symptoms that include anxiety, depression, avoidance, reexperiencing of traumatic events, and hyper-arousal.
COVID-19 and Gender Violence
COVID-19 seems to be similar to the pandemics in the past since this too has resulted in an increase in cases of domestic violence. According to Bradbury-Jones and Isham (52), the lockdown imposed to deal with COVID-19 has granted greater freedom to abusers. Several media reports indicate a surge in cases of domestic violence in various countries. According to Kagi (60), though a drop was observed in the overall crime rates in Australia, the domestic abuse rates increased by 5%. Some charities in Australia also raised concerns about COVID-19 misinformation being used by the offenders to further control and abuse the victims of domestic violence (61). Allen-Ebrahimian (62) reported that China witnessed a three-fold increase in the cases of domestic violence after imposing quarantine. Different states in the United States also reported an increase of about 21–35% in domestic violence (63). Even the UK has been facing concerns due to rising family violence. There has also been an apparent increase in the number of domestic homicides (64). The Refuge website recorded an increase of 150% in the calls about domestic abuse (65). An article in The Indian Express draws attention to the fact that a vast majority of people in Mumbai do not have household water connections. With rising summer temperatures, people spending more time at homes during lockdowns, and emphasis on handwashing, there comes the need for household water. Consequently, many women are turning to underground water market operating under the cloak of darkness. Moreover, women have been spending more time queuing up for water and often approach the market in the wee hours of mornings where they often face verbal and sexual harassment (66). Despite this increase in incidents of gender-based violence, Jagori, a Delhi-based NGO, has witnessed a drop in calls on its helpline numbers by 50%. This could be because of the fear of getting discovered by their offenders at home according to Jaya Velankar, Director Jagori (67). According to Bradbury-Jones and Isham (52), the lockdown imposed to deal with COVID-19 has granted greater freedom to abusers. It has become easier for the abusers to enforce control tactics by limiting the access of the victims to phones, internet, and other people. van Gelder et al. (68) also emphasized that the lockdown limits familiar support options. In an article published by BU today (69), Rothman who is a professor of Community Health Sciences raised concerns about declaring sale of guns to be essential services in some states of the United States. This increases the likelihood of fatal interpersonal violence. Fielding (70) pointed out that the victims of abuse may even be scared to visit a hospital for treatment of their injuries due to the fear of contracting the COVID-19 disease.
Tackling Gender-Based Violence During COVID-19
The first step to tackle the issue of rising gender violence in the times of pandemic is the acknowledgment of the issue, which has been ignored during the pandemics in the past (71). Campbell (28) emphasizes that expanding community partnerships and spreading awareness about the importance of reporting incidents of abuse are crucial to reducing the number of such cases. According to Bradbury and Isham (52), one way to deal with the issue of domestic violence is by constantly asking if people feel safe at home. However, it is very crucial that the people asking these questions have the time and emotional resources. It is often possible that the victims may communicate in subtle and indirect ways, which can be easily missed. They also emphasize the importance of online and telephonic services for those seeking therapeutic interventions, counseling, or any other kind of support. Gerster (72) emphasizes that neighbors of families with violence can also help to reduce domestic violence by initiating conversation with them. Researchers also emphasize the need to train healthcare workers to recognize the signs of violence to tackle the issue of gender-based violence (73, 74). Van Gelder et al. (68) emphasize the role of the media to raise awareness about the issue of gender violence during pandemic as well as about the practices that can replace the conventional in-person support. These may include offering supportive statements, promoting safety guidelines via advertisements, bystander approaches, and accessing help on behalf of the victim after obtaining consent. They also call for increase in service availability and funding for protection needs and shelters during quarantine. Hatchimonji et al. (71) called for coupling physical distancing with social support to ensure that it does not exacerbate gender violence. There is also a strong need to strengthen the helpline services which victims of gender violence can utilize without alerting their offenders. Antonio Guteres, the United Nations Secretary General, also emphasized the need for the countries to prioritize support by setting up emergency warning systems for individuals facing family violence (75). Mazza et al. (76) have emphasized on the need of a trained multidisciplinary staff including psychologists, psychiatrists, and social and legal services to prevent acts of domestic violence and ensure accurate assessment of various domains of the abuse.
Some countries have in fact tried to adapt to the situation of quarantine resulting from COVID-19 by implementing several practices to reduce gender-based violence. For instance, France has set up warning systems at groceries and pharmacies to enable victims of gender and family violence to alert the authorities (77). They may also alert the staff about the required help by using code words that have been introduced. Domestic Violence Resource Center Australia has also issued specific guidance for family and friends to support those in family violence situations (78). UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) and UN Women have published guidelines that can be utilized by various governments to include gender considerations into their responses (15, 79). National Domestic Violence Hotline, USA, has also been offering service via online texting chat so that victims of domestic violence can seek help (80). In Beijing, a judicial court has been using cloud-based platforms and online court hearings to deal with cases of gender-based violence in the times of pandemic (81). Nair and Banerjee (82) emphasized the need for the combined efforts of health professionals with print and digital media to avoid misinformation and educate people about abuse prevention.
In a conversation with staff of AALI (Association for Advocacy and Legal Initiative, Lucknow, India), it was revealed that the actions being taken by the authorities in India are insufficient to deal with the issue of gender violence during COVID-19. NGOs have requested to publicize the phone numbers of the protection officers by sticking them outside their offices to make them more accessible to the victims. The AALI staff member also expressed concern over a lack of sense of urgency when dealing with domestic violence cases under lockdown. The effectiveness of the helplines is reduced if it is not followed by necessary action and is merely recorded as data. The National Commission of Women (NCW), India and NGOs such as Jagori have compiled information pertaining to the One Stop Centers, protection officers, and other support services on their websites. Aman: global Voices for Peace in the Home, which is a network of over 146 organizations and individuals working on the issue of violence against women across 18 states in India, has written a letter to the National Commission of Women, India with collective recommendations to respond to the situation of women facing violence under lockdown. The recommendations include making the helpline numbers such as 181 and 1,091 functional; publicizing the support services and resources available; utilizing Nirbhaya funds (Nirbhaya Fund is a corpus fund of Indian rupee 10 billion created by the Government of India to support the activities and initiatives of the government and NGOs working towards protecting the dignity and ensuring safety of women in India.) to increase the availability of resources available to NGOs offering legal aid, counseling, and shelter to women facing violence; developing special protocols to provide support to trans women, disabled women, and migrant women who are even more marginalized and have negligible access to support; and forming a panel of lawyers offering legal information to women over phone, among others. The Aman network has also recommended to build a temporary shelter in the Kashmir Valley, as there are no shelter homes built under the Protection of Women under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
The outcome of gender-based violence is long lasting for its victims, and rampant for the responses that are often inadequate. Hence, it is crucial to maintain a sense of urgency in cases of gender-based violence even during crisis situations. Based on the above literature review, it can be maintained that there is a need for a holistic response model to deal with the issue of gender-based violence during current and possible future pandemics. Health professionals, media, and community efforts must be combined to effectively deal with the issue of gender-based violence. Moreover, continuous and rigorous efforts are required to put an end to the stigma associated with gender-based violence.
Conclusion
The spread of the novel Coronavirus has created a myriad of problems for the people to grapple with. In the absence of a vaccine and effective treatment for this virus, the governments are forced to impose quarantines to reduce the spread of the disease. However, this has resulted in a paradox of social distancing, which includes issues such as economic instability, mental health problems, and isolation. Although there have been researches exploring the impact of COVID-19, there is a lack of rigorous literature highlighting these issues from the perspective of gender. This also involves the issue of rising gender violence during the pandemic. COVID-19 has not only led to an increase in the cases of gender-based violence but has disconnected them from their support networks. To reduce the prevalence of the issue, it is crucial to acknowledge the extent of gender-based violence, reimagine government policies, and support networks to make it easier for the victims to access them and, lastly, create awareness about the issue as well as the resources available to tackle it.
Author Contributions
SM and TS contributed to the conception, structure of the paper, contributed to analysis, and interpretation of available literature. SM contributed to the development initial draft. TS reviewed and critiqued the output for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Nie W. The origin of quaratine. Global Partners in Education Journal- Special Edition. (2015) 5:24–31. Available online at: http://www.gpejournal.org/index.php/GPEJ/article/view/108
2. Schepin OP. International Quarantine. Translated by Meerovich and Bobrov. New York, NY: International University Press Inc. (1991), p. 3–22.
3. Sabbatani S, and Fiorino S. The Antonine plague and the decline of the Roman empire. Infez Med. (2009) 17:261–75.
4. Rosen W. Justinian's Flea: Plague, Empire, and the Birth of Europe. New York, NY: Viking Adult. (2007).
5. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, and Rubin J. The psychology impact of quarantine and how to reduce it. Lancet. (2020) 395:912–0. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
6. Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, and Styra R. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. (2004) 10:1206–12. doi: 10.3201/eid1007.030703
7. Reynolds DL, Garay JR, Deamond SL, Moran MK, Gold W, and Styra R. Understanding compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol Infect. (2008) 136:997–1007. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807009156
8. Lee SM, Kang WS, Cho AR, Kim T, and Park JK. Psychological impact of the 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients. Compreh Psych. (2018) 87:123–7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.10.003
9. Peterman P, O'Donnell T, Shah O-P, and van Gelder. “Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children.” CGD Working Paper 528. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. (2020). Available online at: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/pandemics-and-violence-against-women-and-children
10. Andersson N, Cockcroft A, and Shea B. Gender-based violence and HIV: relevance for HIV prevention in hyperendemic countries of southern Africa. AIDS. (2008) 4:S73–S86. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000341778.73038.86
11. Chandra J. NCW launches Domestic Violence Helpline. The Hindu. (2020, April 10). Retrieved from: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ncw-launches-domestic-violence-helpline/article31312219.ece
12. New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse (NZFVC). (2020). Preventing and Responding to Family, Whānau and Sexual Violence during COVID-19. Available online at: https://nzfvc.org.nz/COVID-19/preventing-responding-violence-COVID-19
13. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2020). World Disasters Report Focus of Local Actors, the Key to Humanitarian Effectiveness. Lyon, France: Imprimerie Chirat, 1–266, Available online at: http://ifrc-media.org/interactive/world-disasters-report-2015/#:~:text=The%202015%20World%20Disasters%20Report%20%E2%80%93%20launched%20today,face%20in%20scaling-up%20and%20sustaining%20their%20humanitarian%20response
14. Rose C. Plague and violence in early modern Italy. Renaissance Q. (2018) 71:1000–35. doi: 10.1086/699602
15. UNFPA. As Pandemic Rages, Women and Girls Face Intensified Risks. (2020, March 20). Retrieved from: https://www.unfpa.org/news/pandemic-rages-women-and-girlsface-intensified-risks
16. Ghanotakis E, Mayhew S, and Watts C. Tackling HIV. gender-based violence in South Africa: how has PEPFAR responded and what are the implications for implementing organizations? Health Policy Plann. (2009) 24:357–66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp024
17. Godbole S, and Mehendale S. HIV/AIDS epidemic in India: risk factors, risk behavior & strategies for prevention & control. Ind J Med Res. (2005) 121:356–68.
18. Silverman JG, Decker MR, Sagurti N, Balaiah D, and Raj A. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among married indian women. J Am Med Assoc. (2008) 300:703–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.6.703
19. Haneef C, and Kalyanpur A. Global Rapid Gender Analysis for COVID 19. New York, NY: CARE and International Rescue Committee. (2020).
20. Menéndez C, Lucas A, Munguambe K, and Langer A. ‘Ebola crisis: the unequal impact on women and children's health. Lancet Global Health. (2015) 3:e130. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70009-4
21. Okur P. Sexual and reproductive health and rights of people on the move. MT Bull Netherl Soc Trop Med Int Health. (2016) 54:8–9. Available online at: https://www.rutgers.nl/sites/rutgersnl/files/PDF/nvtg_mt_2016-8-9.pdf
22. World Health Organizations Global Ethics Unit. WHO Ethical Guidance for Managing Epidemic Outbreaks. In: 11th Global Summit of National Ethics/ Bioethics Committees, Conference Report, Global Health, Global Ethics, Global Justice. Berlin. (2016). p. 118–151.
23. John N, Casey SE, Carino G, and McGovern T. Lessons Never Learned: Crisis and gender?based violence. Dev World Bioeth. (2020) 20:65–68. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12261
24. Palermo T, and Peterman A. Undercounting, overcounting, and the longevity of flawed estimates: statistics on sexual violence in conflict. Bull World Health Organiz. (2011) 89:924–26. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089888
25. Dobson N. From under the mud-pack: women and the charleville floods [online]. Macedon Digest. (1994) 9:11–3.
26. Enarson E, and Fordman M. From women's needs to women's rights in disasters. Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards. (2001) 3:133–6. doi: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0314
27. Fothergill A., and Peek L. Poverty and disasters in the united states: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards. (2004) 32:89–110 doi: 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
28. Campbell AM. An increasing risk of family violence during COVID-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Foren Sci Int. (2020) 2:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089
29. Fisher S. Sri Lankan Women's orgnazitions responding to post tsunami violence. In: Enarson E, Chakrabarty P, editors. Women Gender and Disaster Global Issues and Initiatives. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt. (2009). doi: 10.4135/9788132108078.n18
30. Sikira A, and Urassa JK. Linking the twin pandemics: gender based violence and and HIV in Serengeti district, Mara, Tanzania. Int Asian Soc Sci. (2015) 5:324–34. doi: 10.18488/journal.1/2015.5.6/1.6.324.334
31. Davies SE, and Bennett BA. Gendered human rights analysis of Ebola and Zika: locating gender in global health emergencies. Int Affairs. (2016) 92:1041–60. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12704
32. Onyango MA, Resnick K, Davis A, and Shah RR. Gender-Based Violence Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women: A Neglected Consequence of the West African Ebola Outbreak. In: Schwartz D, Anoko J, Abramowitz S, editors. Pregnant in the Time of Ebola. Global Maternal and Child Health (Medical, Anthropological, and Public Health Perspectives). Cham: Springer (2019). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97637-2_8
33. Yasmin S. The Ebola Rape Epidemic No One's Talking About. Foreign Policy News. (2016). Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/02/the-ebola-rape-epidemic-west-africa-teenage-pregnancy/ (accessed March 28, 2020).
34. Arthur C, and Clark R. Determinants of domestic violence: a cross-national study. Int J Soc Family. (2009) 35:147–67. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23070721
35. Alon TM, Olmstead-Rumsey J, Doepke M, and Tertilt M. The Impact of COVID 19 on Gender Equality. Cambridge: Working Paper National Bureau of Economic Research. (2020) 26947. doi: 10.3386/w26947
36. Mak IWC, Chu CM, Pan PC, You MGC, and Chan VL. Long-term psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2009) 31:318–26. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001
37. Reissman DB, Watson PJ, Klomp RW, Tanielian TL, and Prior SD. Pandemic influenza preparedness: adaptive responses to an evolving challenge. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. (2006) 3:1–26. doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1233
38. Zhang J, Lu H, Zeng H, Zhang S, Du Q, Jiang T, et al. The differential psychological distress of the populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav Immunity. (2020) 87:49–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.031
39. Capaldi DM, Knoble NB, Wu Shortt J, and Kim HK. A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse. (2012) 3:231–80. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231
40. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus J, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. (2013) 10:e1001439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439
41. Leonard KE. Editorial: Alcohol and intimate partner violence: When can we say that heavy drinking is a contributing cause of violence? Addiction. (2005) 100:422–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00994.x
42. Field CA, Caetano R, and Nelson S. Alcohol and violence related cognitive risk factors associated with the perpetration of intimate partner violence. J Family Viol. (2004) 19:249–53. doi: 10.1023/B:JOFV.0000032635.42145.66
43. Polakovic G. Pandemic drives alcohol sales — and raises concerns about substance abuse. Business Health USC News. (2020). Available online at: https://news.usc.edu/168549/COVID-19-alcohol-sales-abuse-stress-relapse-usc-experts/ (accessed July 8, 2020).
44. Henson S. Drug and Alcohol Use Increase during COVID 19. The Recovery Village (2020). Available online at: https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/drug-addiction/news/drug-alcohol-use-rising-during-COVID/
45. Mobarak MA, and Ramos A. The Effects of Migration on Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence for the Exposure Reduction Theory in Bangladesh. (2019). Working paper Available online at: https://sistemas.colmex.mx/Reportes/LACEALAMES/LACEA-LAMES2019_paper_321.pdf (accessed March 19, 2020).
46. Brenner MH. Trends in alcohol consumption and associated illnesses some effects of economic changes. Am J Public Health. (1975) 65:1279–92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.65.12.1279
47. Brenner MH. Economic instability, unemployment rates, behavioral risks, and mortality rates in Scotland, 1952–1983. Int J Health Serv. (1987) 17:475–87. doi: 10.2190/5GVU-86Y6-NH1U-PQB0
48. Mulia N, Zemore SE, Murphy R, Liu H, and Catalano R. Economic loss alcohol consumption problems during the 2008 to 2009 U.S. recession. Alcoh Clin Exp Res. (2013) 38:1026–34. doi: 10.1111/acer.12301
49. Renzetti CM. Economic Stress and Domestic Violence. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence (2009). Available online at: http://www.vawnet.org
50. Bhalotra S, Kambhampati U, Rawlings S, and Siddique Z. Intimate partner violence: the influence of job opportunities for men and women. World Bank Econ Rev. (2019) lhz030. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhz030
51. Schneider D, Harknett K, and McLanahan S. Intimate partner violence in the great recession. Demography. (2016) 53:471–505. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0462-1
52. Bradbury-Jones C, and Isham L. The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. (2020) 29:2047–49. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15296
53. UNICEF GBViE Helpdesk. Emergency Responses to Public Health Outbreaks. (2018). Retrieved from: https://gbvaor.net/thematic-areas
54. Richards L. DASH: Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour-Based Violence Risk Identification and Assessment and Management Model. DASH Risk Checklist (2009, April 12). Retrieved from: www.dashriskchecklist.co.uk
55. US Department of Justice. Violence Against Women: Identifying Risk Factors. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice (2004).
56. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancent. (2002) 359:1331–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
57. Woods SJ. Prevalence and patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder in abused and post abused women. Issues Mental Health Nurs.(2009) 21:309–24. doi: 10.1080/016128400248112
58. Jackson H, Philp E, Nuttall RL, and Diller L. Traumatic brain injury: a hidden consequence for battered women. Prof Psychol. (2002) 33:39–45. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.33.1.39
59. Walker LE. Battered Women Syndrome. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company (2015), p. 49–74. doi: 10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp396
60. Kagi J. Crime Rate in WA Plunges Amid Coronavirus Social Distancing Lockdown Measures. ABC News Australia. (2020). Available online at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-08/coronavirus-shutdown-sees-crime-ratedrop-in-wa/12132410 (accessed 10 April, 2020).
61. Gearin M, and Knight B. Family Violence Perpetrators Using COVID-19 as a Form of Abuse We Have Not Experienced Before. ABC News Australia. (2020, April 7). Retrieved from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-29/coronavirus-family-violence-surge-in-victoria/12098546
62. Allen-Ebrahimian B. China's Domestic Violence Epidemic, Axios. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.axios.com/china-domestic-violencecoronavirusquarantine-7b00c3ba-35bc-4d16-afdd-b76ecfb28882.html (accessed April 7, 2020).
63. Wagers S. Domestic Violence Growing in Wake of Coronavirus Outbreak. The Conversation (2020). Available online at: https://theconversation.com/domestic-violence-growing-in-wake-of-coronavirus-outbreak-135598 (accessed April 10, 2020).
64. Ingala S, and Smith K. Counting Dead Women. (2020). Available online at: https://kareningalasmith.com/
65. Kelly J, and Morgan T. Coronavirus: Domestic Abuse Calls Up 25% Since Lockdown, Charity Says (2020). BBC NEWS. Available online at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52157620
66. Shah K. How COVID-19 is Amplifying Gender Inequality in India. The Indian Express (2020, May 17). Retrieved from: indianexpress.com/article/opinion/coronavirus-gender-inequality-india-6414659/
67. Chandra J. COVID 19 Lockdown Rise in Domestic Violence, Police Apathy: NCW. The Hindu (2020, April 2). Retrieved from: www.thehindu.com/news/national/COVID-19-lockdown-spike-in-domestic-violence-says~ncw/article31238659.ece
68. van Gelder N, Peterman A, Potts A, O'Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, et al. COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence. EClinicalMedicine. (2020) 21:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100348
69. Samuels M. Understanding the Impact of COVID 19 on Domestic Violence. Boston University Today (2020, April 16). Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/articles/2020/COVID19-impact-on-domestic-violence/
70. Fielding S. In Quarantine With an Abuser: Surge in Domestic Violence Reports Linked to Coronavirus. The Guardian. (2020, April 8). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/03/coronavirus-quara~ntine-abuse-domestic-violence
71. Hatchimonji JS, Swendiman RA, Seamon MJ, and Nance ML. Trauma does not quarantine: violence during the COVID 19 pandemic. Ann Surg. (2020) 272:e53–e54. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003996
72. Gerster J. When Home Isn't Safe: How Coronavirus Puts Neighbours on Front Lines of Abuse. Global News (2020, April 7). Retrieved from: https://globalnews.ca/news/6723582/coronavirus-domestic-abuse/
73. WHO. Health Care for Women Subjected to Intimate Partner Violence or Sexual Violence: A Clinical Handbook. WHO (2014). Available online at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/vaw-clinical-handbook/en/
74. WHO. Strengthening Health Systems to Respond to Women Subjected to Intimate Partner Violence or Sexual Violence: A Manual for Health Managers. (2017). Available online at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/vaw-health-systems-manual/en/
75. France 24. UN Chief Decries'horrifying' Rise in Domestic Violence Amid Virus Lockdown. France 24. (2020 April 6). Retrieved from: https://www.france24.com/en/20200406-un-chief-decries-horrifying-rise-in-domestic-violence-amid-virus-lockdown
76. Mazza M, Marano G, Lai C, Janin L, and Sani G. Danger in danger: interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry Res. (2020) 289:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046
77. Guenfound I. French Women Use Code Words at Pharmacies to Escape Domestic Violence During Coronavirus Lockdown. ABC News (2020, April 8). Retrieved from: https://abcnews.go.com/International/frenchwomen-code-words-pharmacies-escape-domestic-violence/story?id=69954238
78. Domestic Violence Resources Centre Australia (DVRCA). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Family Violence. (2020). DVRCA. Available online at: http://www.dvrcv.org.au/help-advice/coronavirus-COVID-19-and-family-violence/family-friends-and-neighbours (accessed April 10, 2020).
79. UN Women. Checklist for COVID-19 Response by UN Women Deputy Executive Director Åsa Regnér. (2020). Available online at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/3/news-checklist-for-COVID-19-response-by-ded-regner (accessed March 20, 2020).
80. Godin M. (2020). March 18. As Cities Around the World Go on Lockdown, Victims of Domestic Violence Look for a Way Out. Time Magazine. Retrieved from https://time.com/5803887/coronavirus-domestic-violence-victims/
81. Fraser. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Violence against Women and Girls. (2020). Available online at: https://gbvguidelines.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/vawg-helpdesk-284-COVID-19-and-vawg.pdf (accessed March 20, 2020).
Keywords: quarantine, gender-based violence, pandemic, domestic violence, COVID 19
Citation: Mittal S and Singh T (2020) Gender-Based Violence During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mini-Review. Front. Glob. Womens Health 1:4. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.00004
Received: 06 June 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020;
Published: 08 September 2020.
Edited by:
Jayashri Kulkarni, Monash University, AustraliaReviewed by:
Sonia Shenoy, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, IndiaElizabeth Thomas, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Australia
Copyright © 2020 Mittal and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tushar Singh, tusharsinghalld@gmail.com