Yonghua Bi
Jianzhuang Ren
Xinwei Han- Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Objective: Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been widely used as a salvage therapy for patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. However, the role of fully covered SEMSs in the management of hemorrhage caused by esophageal cancer has not yet been established. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of fully covered SEMSs as a salvage therapy for esophageal cancer-related hemorrhage.
Methods: From September 2019 to March 2022, 17 patients, who underwent the insertion of fully covered SEMS for malignant esophageal hemorrhages, were retrospectively analyzed. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans and esophagographies were performed routinely to determine the location and length of the tumor. A fully covered SEMS was implanted under fluoroscopy. Baseline demographics were retrospectively collected, that is those for sex, age, previous treatment, comorbidities, lesion type, and stent size.
Results: A total of 20 metal stents were placed in 17 patients, with a technical success rate of 100% and a hemostasis success rate of 88.2%. Stent removal was performed in three patients because of complications. No perioperative deaths were related to stent placement or removal. Five main complications (29.4%) were found after stent insertion. Stent migration and restenosis were observed in two patients (11.8%). Except for two perioperative deaths and one patient lost to follow-up, all remaining 14 patients were successfully followed up. At the end of follow-up, two patients had survived without obvious symptoms, and a total of 12 patients were dead owing to tumor progression (n = 10), severe infection (n = 1), and cerebrovascular accident (n = 1). The median overall survival was 13.8 months.
Conclusion: Insertion of a fully covered SEMS may be a safe and effective means of the salvage management of refractory esophageal cancer-related hemorrhage, and its use in this context may lead to the development of innovative methods for compression hemostasis. However, further study with a larger sample size and comparison with other forms of salvage therapy.
Introduction
Approximately half of all patients with esophageal cancer are diagnosed in the middle and advanced stages of the disease, that is the stages in which tumors are not completely resectable (1); those patients often have a poor prognosis, with a low 5-year overall survival rate (2–4). Esophageal hemorrhage occurs in approximately 1%–5% of patients with advanced esophageal cancer, which is a big challenge (5). As a first-line treatment of tumor hemostasis, many kinds of endoscopic treatment modalities have been used, including the application of heater probes, local injections of adrenaline, argon plasma coagulation, and cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation (6). However, rebreeding occurs frequently despite the variety of endoscopic interventions (7).
Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement has been served as palliative treatment for advanced esophageal patients with esophageal fistula or stricture (8–10). Fully covered SEMSs have been widely used as a salvage therapy for patients with esophageal variceal bleeding (11, 12). However, only a few case reports and case series, such as those on duodenal tumors (13, 14) and esophageal cancer (6, 12, 15), report the use of fully covered SEMSs for malignant tumors in the upper gastrointestinal track to achieve hemostasis after the failure of conventional endoscopic interventions.
In addition, it should be noted that massive esophageal hemorrhage is also observed following SEMS insertion for patients with malignant esophageal stricture or fistula (16–18). Currently, the role of fully covered SEMS in the management of hemorrhage caused by esophageal cancer is not established. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of fully covered SEMS as a salvage therapy for esophageal cancer-related hemorrhage.
Materials and methods
Study design
From September 2019 to March 2022, 17 patients, who underwent the placement of fully covered SEMS, for malignant esophageal hemorrhage, were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a malignant airway stricture without airway stent placement or proximal esophageal cancer (both of which are contraindications to the insertion of esophageal stents); and the patient’s inability to comply with follow-up procedures. Baseline demographics were retrospectively collected, including sex, age, previous treatment, comorbidities, lesion type, and stent size. Ethics approval was waived by the Institutional Review Board of University because of the study’s retrospective nature. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before they underwent stenting procedures.
Stent insertion
Chest computed tomography (CT) scans were performed before stenting to show the location and length of the esophageal cancer (Figures 1A, 2A). The stent size was assessed according to the measured data, with a length of 2 cm longer than the tumor length. All stent placements and removal procedures were performed under local anesthesia and fluoroscopy. Esophagography was performed by using an oral iodine contrast agent to confirm the tumor site and length (Figures 2C, 3A). A 5F catheter (Cook Corporation, Bloomington, IN, USA) was inserted and a fully covered SEMS was implanted along a stiff guide wire. Esophagography was performed immediately after stent placement to show the patency of the SEMS (Figures 2D, 3B, C). A removal hook and 10- to 12-F-long sheaths were inserted for stent removal if necessary.
Figure 1 Transarterial chemoembolization for esophageal cancer. (A) A thickened esophageal wall was observed in the lower esophagus. (B) Staining of the tumor and its feeding artery were observed after angiography. (C) The left gastric artery was embolized with 350- to 560-μm polyvinyl alcohol particles after the infusion of 100 mg of oxaliplatin and 250 mg of fluorouracil.
Figure 2 A 60-year-old male with esophageal hemorrhage treated by self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion. (A) Chest computed tomography (CT) scan showed a thickened wall in the middle esophagus. (B) Transarterial embolization was performed, but hemorrhage did not stop. (C) Esophagography showed complete obstruction in the middle esophagus. (D) Esophagography shows a good position and patency of stent after placement. CT, computed tomography; SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent.
Figure 3 Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion procedure. (A) Anteroposterior esophagography showed complete obstruction in the lower esophagus. (B) The delivery system of segmental radioactive metal stent was inserted, and stent migration happened. (C) Another fully covered SEMS was released by withdrawing the sheath. (D) Esophagography confirmed that the contrast agent passed smoothly after stent placement. SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent.
Follow-up
All patients were followed up by telephone interview or outpatient visits until 9 July 2022, or until their death. During the follow-up period, chest CT scans and/or esophagoscopies were performed (Figure 3D). Cause of death and survival outcomes were recorded. The main complications identified were procedure-related death, massive hemorrhage, esophageal perforation, stent migration, or restenosis. The primary end point of this study was the hemostasis success rate. The median overall survival was calculated either from stent placement or diagnosis of the esophageal cancer. Patient safety and overall survival were the study’s secondary end points.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were shown as means ± standard deviations (SDs) or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). The survival curve was calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis (GraphPad; GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 17 patients (14 males and three females), were enrolled, with a mean age of 70.4 ± 10.7 years. Eight patients had esophageal squamous cell cancer, two patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma, and one patient had undifferentiated carcinoma. The remaining six patients were hospitalized in emergency cases for esophageal bleeding and had esophageal stents placed during these emergency visits, meaning that we could not obtain pathological results for them. Three (17.6%), seven (41.2%), and four patients (23.5%) had tumors in the upper, middle, and lower esophagus, respectively. One patient was diagnosed with recurrent cancer 4 years after surgical resection and the remaining 16 patients were diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer. Eight patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before SEMS placement (Table 1). Two patients who underwent stent placement for coronary disease had additional antithrombotic therapy. On admission, 14 of the 17 patients enrolled had a normal international normalized ratio, a mean prothrombin time test time of 11.9 ± 1.4 s, and mean thrombocyte count of 106.6 ± 52.1. Before stent placement, the mean red cell count was (3.7 ± 0.4) × 109/L, and the mean hemoglobin level was 110.2 ± 13.2 g/L.
Table 1 Patient characteristics at admission.
Stent placement and removal
A total of 20 metal stents were placed, comprising two segmental radioactive metal stents, 17 Bonastents, and one Ultraflex stent. The median diameter of the stents was 20 mm (IQR 18–20 mm) and median length was 100 mm (IQR 100–120 mm). The median inpatient duration was 8.5 days, and the total hospitalization cost was 4.8 × 104 renminbi. Stent placement was technically successful in all patients (100%). Two patients died of non-procedure-related esophageal hemorrhage after stent placement, with a hemostasis success rate of 88.2%. Hemostasis success was found in all three female patients and in 12 of the 14 male patients, indicating that there was no significant difference in hemostasis success rate between male and female patients. Stent removal was performed in one and two patients because of intolerance of stent (n = 1) and restenosis (n = 2), respectively. One patient had stent replacement 6.6 months later due to an esophageal fistula caused by tumor progression, and a new fully covered SEMS was placed. The median indwelling duration of all stents was 3.1 months (IQR 1.5–5.5 months). In addition, two patients received transarterial embolization and three patients received transarterial chemoembolization before stent placement (Figures 1B, C, 2B).
Complications
No perioperative deaths were related to stent placement or removal, and the stent placement process did not induce or aggravate hematemesis. One patient complained of discomfort after stent insertion. Five main complications (29.4%) were identified during and after stent placement. Stent migration was observed in two patients (11.8%); one patient needed additional stent placement, whereas the other patient, with mild migration, did not require management. Stent restenosis was observed in two patients after 4.2 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Stent removal was performed for two patients with stent restenosis (Table 2).
Table 2 Clinical data on stenting.
Follow-up
Except for two perioperative deaths and one patient lost to follow-up, all remaining 14 patients were followed up within a median period of 3.4 months after stent placement. At the end of follow-up, two patients had survived without obvious symptoms, and a total of 12 patients were dead owing to tumor progression (n = 10), severe infection (n = 1), and cerebrovascular accident (n = 1). The median overall survival was 13.8 months (Figure 4). There was no significant difference in overall survival between male and female patients.
Figure 4 Overall survival follow-up. The median overall survival calculated from stent placement or diagnosis of the esophageal cancer was 3.5 and 10.6 months, respectively.
Discussion
Esophageal hemorrhage is a big challenge for patients with advanced esophageal cancer, and occurs in approximately 1%–5% of this patient group (5). The esophagus is a hollow organ, meaning that during bleeding, blood flows from the esophagus into the stomach, where it is difficult for compression or spontaneous hemostasis to occur. Thus, esophageal hemorrhage is most likely to be fatal. Endoscopic treatment modalities are first-line treatments of tumor hemostasis (6). However, rebreeding occurs frequently despite the variety of endoscopic interventions (7).
The insertion of SEMSs is usually used in the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stricture in patients with recurrent or advanced esophageal cancer (8–10). Fully covered SEMSs have been used as a means of alternative management for esophageal perforation and fistula (19–21), as well as a salvage therapy for patients with esophageal variceal bleeding caused by cirrhosis (11, 12, 22, 23).
It is hard to find any studies about stenting treatments of fully covered SEMSs for malignant gastrointestinal hemorrhage, although there are some positive case reports about the use of stenting for refractory hemorrhage. For example, it has been reported that the placement of a fully or partially covered SEMS was effective for an intractable malignant hemorrhage caused by unresectable duodenal cancer (13, 14, 24). Yen et al. (14) also reported that, in a patient with duodenal cancer and multiple liver metastases, hematochezia stopped soon after the insertion of a partially covered SEMS (inserted by applying compression pressure on the cancer surface). Relatedly, D’Souza et al. (24) successfully induced hemostasis with the insertion of fully covered SEMS in a patient with uncontrollable duodenal hemorrhage caused by invasion of local recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.
Currently, only a few case reports or a small number of case series report the use of fully covered SEMSs for esophageal cancer to achieve hemostasis after the failure of conventional endoscopic interventions to do so (6, 12, 15). Zhou et al. described a successful hemostasis with the placement of a fully covered SEMS in four patients with malignant esophageal hemorrhage (12). Bilal et al. (6) inserted a fully covered SEMS in a patient with a diffusely bleeding esophageal tumor with a severe luminal obstruction, which resulted in complete hemostasis and the resolution of symptoms. Isono et al. (15) also successfully induced hemostasis in a patient with a hemorrhage caused by esophageal tumor after esophageal stent placement.
In addition, massive esophageal hemorrhage is also observed following SEMS insertion in patients with malignant esophageal stricture or fistula (16, 17). Prior history of radiotherapy, the presence of esophageal fistula, and concomitant airway stent insertion are major factors contributing to esophageal hemorrhage after stent insertion for patients with esophageal cancer (17, 18). Thus, the role of fully covered SEMSs in the management of hemorrhage caused by esophageal cancer has not been established.
Our present study demonstrates that the insertion of a fully covered SEMS can be a salvage therapy tool for the management of esophageal cancer-related hemorrhage. SEMS insertion was technically successful in all patients, with no procedure-related deaths, and the compression hemostasis success rate was 88.2%. Although the insertion and removal of fully covered SEMS is not free from complications, our study showed a low rate of complications, that is major complications were observed in only 29.4% of patients. Stent migration was observed in only two patients, with a migration rate of 11.8%, which was lower than previous reports. Stent restenosis was also observed in two patients. Stent removal was performed in only two patients because of complications (25, 26). In our study, and in a few others, the placement of fully covered SEMSs could be both a safe and effective means of the salvage management of refractory malignant esophageal hemorrhage.
In addition, previous systemic treatments are most likely an important cause of esophageal bleeding. Only therapy refractory bleeding cases should be managed by the insertion of fully covered SEMS, considering that endoscopic treatment modalities are first-line treatments (although the technical success rate was 100% for all patients with stent placement indications, and the stent placement process did not induce or aggravate hematemesis in this study). Furthermore, there are contraindications to the insertion of esophageal stents. For example, esophageal stent placement may cause airway compression and asphyxia in patients with malignant airway stricture without airway stent placement. Stent intolerance, or even the development of laryngeal edema after stent placement in patients with proximal esophageal cancer, are additional complications associated with this procedure.
There were some limitations in our study. This is a retrospective study performed in a single center, over a long period of time (2019–2022), and on only 17 cases. Statistical significance and a comparison study is not expected for subgroups analysis in this pilot study because of its small sample size. Different types of SEMSs were used, including the segmental radioactive metal stent, the Bonastent and the Ultraflex stent, which may confer bias. In addition, transarterial embolization and chemoembolization procedures were not performed on all patients. Large studies and more data are required for statistical validation.
Conclusion
Insertion of fully covered SEMSs is a safe and effective means of the salvage management of refractory esophageal cancer-related hemorrhage, and may be a way forward toward its innovative use of compression hemostasis.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethics approval was not provided for this study on human participants because ethics approval was waived by the Institutional Review Board of University due to its retrospective nature. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Conception and design: all authors. Data acquisition: all authors. Data analysis: YB. Data interpretation: all authors. Drafting the manuscript: YB. Critical revision of the manuscript: all authors. Statistical analysis: YB. Supervision: XH. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Bi Y, Zhu X, Yu Z, Jiao D, Yi M, Han X, et al. Radioactive feeding tube in the palliation of esophageal malignant obstruction. Radiol Med (2020) 125:544–50. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01151-9
2. Sundelof M, Ye W, Dickman PW, Lagergren J. Improved survival in both histologic types of oesophageal cancer in Sweden. Int J Cancer (2002) 99:751–4. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10420
3. Kubba AK, Krasner N. An update in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia. Eur J Surg Oncol (2000) 26:116–29. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0754
4. Bi Y, Shi X, Ren J, Yi M, Han X, Song M. Clinical outcomes of doxorubicin-eluting CalliSpheres(R) beads-transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol (2021) 21:231. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01816-3
5. Ofosu A, Ramai D, Latson W, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of bleeding gastrointestinal tumors. Ann Gastroenterol (2019) 32:346–51. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0391
6. Bilal S, Saeed SM, Siddique MZ, Saqib M, Mehmood S, Yusuf MA. Salvage therapy of bleeding esophageal tumor by fully covered self-expandable metallic stent: A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep (2021) 9:2050313X21997198. doi: 10.1177/2050313X21997198
7. Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Aslanian HR, Bhutani MS, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, et al. Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos). VideoGIE (2019) 4:285–99. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.02.004
8. Bi Y, Li J, Yi M, Yu Z, Han X, Ren J. Self-expanding segmental radioactive metal stents for palliation of malignant esophageal strictures. Acta Radiol (2020) 61:921–6. doi: 10.1177/0284185119886315
9. Bi Y, Li J, Yi M, Yu Z, Han X, Ren J. Interventional protocol for treatment of complications after esophagojejunostomy for esophagogastric carcinoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract (2019) 2019:1465301. doi: 10.1155/2019/1465301
10. Bi Y, Yi M, Yu Z, Han X, Ren J. Covered metallic stent for the treatment of malignant esophageal fistula combined with stricture. BMC Gastroenterol (2020) 20:248. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01398-6
11. Escorsell A, Bosch J. Self-expandable metal stents in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Gastroenterol Res Pract (2011) 2011:910986. doi: 10.1155/2011/910986
12. Zhou Y, Huo J, Wang X, Liu D. Covered self-expanding metal stents for the treatment of refractory esophageal nonvariceal bleeding: A case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A (2014) 24:713–7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0551
13. Orii T, Karasawa Y, Kitahara H, Yoshimura M, Okumura M. Efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent inserted for refractory hemorrhage of duodenal cancer. Case Rep Gastroenterol (2016) 10:151–6. doi: 10.1159/000445738
14. Yen HH, Chen YY, Su PY. Successful use of a fully covered metal stent for refractory bleeding from a duodenal cancer. Endoscopy (2015) 47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E34–5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391130
15. Isono Y, Saito T, Tochio T, Kumazawa H, Tanaka H, Matsusaki S, et al. Hemostasis by esophageal stent placement for management of esophageal tumor bleeding:a case report. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi (2021) 113:2029–34. doi: 10.11405/nisshoshi.113.2029
16. Kos X, Trotteur G, Dondelinger RF. Delayed esophageal hemorrhage caused by a metal stent: treatment with embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (1998) 21:428–30. doi: 10.1007/s002709900293
17. Liu SY, Xiao P, Li TX, Cao HC, Mao AW, Jiang HS, et al. Predictor of massive bleeding following stent placement for malignant oesophageal stricture/fistulae: A multicentre study. Clin Radiol (2016) 71:471–5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.001
18. Shan M, Lu Z, Guo Q, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wen F. Self-expanding metal stents for palliative treatment of esophageal carcinoma: Risk factors for fatal massive bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol (2012) 46:758–63. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824bdb1d
19. Bi Y, Li J, Yu Z, Han X, Wu G. Modified type of double-covered self-expandable segmental metallic stents for palliation of esophageal fistula. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A (2019) 29:875–9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0722
20. Bi Y, Zhu X, Yu Z, Wu G, Han X, Ren J. Interventional radiology protocol for treatment of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage. Radiol Med (2019) 124:1253–61. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01074-0
21. Bi Y, Wu Z, Yi M, Han X, Ren J. Three-tube method and covered metallic stent for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. BMC Gastroenterol (2020) 20:330. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01480-z
22. Santos S, Simoes G, Lemos J, Saiote J, Loureiro R, Seves I. Long-term self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for esophageal variceal bleeding: A picture of the natural history. Am J Gastroenterol (2020) 115:1915–7. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000802
23. Muller M, Seufferlein T, Perkhofer L, Wagner M, Kleger A. Self-expandable metal stents for persisting esophageal variceal bleeding after band ligation or injection-therapy: A retrospective study. PloS One (2015) 10:e0126525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126525
24. D'Souza PM, Sandha GS, Teshima CW. Refractory bleeding from a malignant duodenal ulcer treated with placement of a fully-covered gastroduodenal stent. Dig Dis Sci (2013) 58:3359–61. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2695-9
25. Bi Y, Chen H, Zhang W, Han X, Ren J. Fluoroscopic removal of embedded esophageal self-expanding metal stents: Stent-in-Stent combined with guidewire lasso technique. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2021). doi: 10.5761/atcs.cr.21-00120
Keywords: esophageal cancer, esophageal hemorrhage, self-expanding metal stent, compression hemostasis, complications
Citation: Bi Y, Ren J and Han X (2023) Compression hemostasis using fully covered self-expandable metallic stents for refractory hemorrhages caused by esophageal cancer: A pilot study. Front. Gastroenterol. 2:1120795. doi: 10.3389/fgstr.2023.1120795
Received: 10 December 2022; Accepted: 20 January 2023;
Published: 21 February 2023.
Edited by:
Sumant Inamdar, University of Arkansas System, United StatesReviewed by:
Beishi Zheng, Woodhull Medical and Mental Health Center, United StatesTony Tham, Ulster Hospital, United Kingdom
Ioannis (Jiannis) Anastasiou, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States
Copyright © 2023 Bi, Ren and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinwei Han, ZHJlYW13ZWF2ZXIwOEAxMjYuY29t