Circulating N-Terminal Probrain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Relation to Ischemic Stroke and Its Subtypes: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Mendelian randomization was used to evaluate the potential causal association between N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and ischemic stroke based on summary statistics data from large-scale genome-wide association studies. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs198389, rs13107325, and rs11105306 associated with NT-proBNP levels found in large general populations and in patients with acute heart disease were used as instrumental variables. The results of genetic association analysis of each single SNP show that there is no significant association between NT-proBNP levels and ischemic stroke or its subtypes, whereas rs198389 alone has a suggestive association with large-artery atherosclerosis stroke. The MR analysis of three SNPs shows that NT-proBNP levels may reduce the risk of small-vessel occlusion stroke suggestively. This genetic analysis provides insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of ischemic stroke.

Introduction

Stroke is the second major cause of global death with a mortality rate of approximately 5.5 million/year and poses a huge financial burden to family members and public health (Donkor, 2018). The study of INTERSTROKE presents 10 potentially modifiable risk factors that are associated with around 90% of acute strokes (O'Donnell et al., 2016), and according to the data from the INTERHEART study, those factors also account for the great majority of the risk of myocardial infarction (Yusuf et al., 2004). Therefore, it is generally acknowledged that a bidirectional interaction exists between brain damage and heart dysfunction (Chen et al., 2017; Scheitz et al., 2018), which may share overlapping cell death pathways (Gonzales-Portillo et al., 2016).

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is an N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), released from the heart muscle in response to the blood pressure and volume overload (Daniels and Maisel, 2007). This factor is widely used in the clinic as a prognostic biomarker to predict mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, and heart failure (Johansson et al., 2016). Compared with BNP, NT-proBNP presents a longer circulating half-life, higher plasma concentration, and greater diagnostic sensitivity. Due to the connections between cardiac dysfunction and stroke, NT-proBNP is supposed to be a potential predictor for the risk of ischemic stroke (Zhao et al., 2020a).

The relationship between NT-proBNP and risks of stroke remains a popular research subject. The related research dates back to 1996 (Rubattu et al., 1996). The scientific community has increasing interest in this area from 2010 (García-Berrocoso et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Quan et al., 2010) to 2020 (Bhatia et al., 2020; Harpaz et al., 2020; Hotsuki et al., 2020; Khan and Kamal, 2020; Medranda et al., 2020; Rubattu et al., 2020; Shirotani et al., 2020; Tonomura et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Watson et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020b). Several studies explore and identify variable degrees of correlation in different types of stroke. The data from the population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study shows that NT-proBNP was associated positively with total stroke, non-lacunar ischemic, as well as cardioembolic stroke, but not with lacunar or hemorrhagic stroke (Folsom et al., 2013). NT-proBNP is a strong predictor of atrial fibrillation, which makes it a contributor to the incidence of cardioembolic stroke (Yang et al., 2014). A recent study indicates that serum levels of NT-proBNP higher than 800 pg/ml obtained within 72 h after a transient ischemic attack were associated with an increased risk of stroke (Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2020). More interestingly, in 2019, based on the Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe-Consortium, Castelnuovo et al. (2019) analyzed data of 58,173 participants free of stroke from six community-based cohort studies and found that, in the European group, levels of NT-proBNP have positive association with risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, independent from several other conditions and risk factors. These findings cannot be easily explained by the known physiological function of BNP.

The role of NT-proBNP in the incidence of stroke became an unsolved question. A meta-analysis of 16 studies suggests that NT-proBNP provides minor clinical predictive values for the prediction of stroke mortality (García-Berrocoso et al., 2013). According to the research of George et al. (Giannakoulas et al., 2005), no significant correlation was observed between NT-proBNP levels and stroke severity or infarct volume. Another study also denied this association in terms of functional outcomes (Etgen et al., 2005). Evidence suggests the causal relationships of natriuretic peptides to endothelial permeability, which might predispose people to atherosclerosis and hemorrhages (Lee et al., 2007; Lin et al., 2007; Kuhn, 2012; Cannone et al., 2013). Therefore, some researchers hypothesized that NT-proBNP may be involved in the causal physiological path for stroke incidence or be a causal risk factor of stroke (Cushman et al., 2014; Di Castelnuovo et al., 2019). However, a large number of studies confirms that BNP is a protective factor of CAD and a self-regulator of the body’s pathological state. The release of BNP improves myocardial relaxation and response to the acute increase of ventricular volume by opposing sodium retention, vasoconstriction, and antidiuretic effects of the activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (Daniels and Maisel, 2007). All of these findings suggest that BNP may also have a protective role in stroke.

As a result, available clinical observational studies investigating the association between NT-proBNP and risk of stroke show ambiguous results. The confounding factors of the observational studies may cause BNP levels to rise, but this increase is not one of the causes of stroke; and those studies cannot rule out some implicit risk factors of stroke.

To circumvent the limitations of observational studies, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to improve causal inference. This technique is based on the premise that human genetic variants are randomly distributed among the population. This method may avoid the potential confounding factors within the exposure–outcome relationship and provide insight into the genetic association between the circulating NT-proBNP levels and ischemic stroke (Figure 1). Therefore, we conducted an MR analysis to investigate the causal effect of NT-proBNP on ischemic stroke and its subtypes (cardioembolism stroke, small-vessel occlusion stroke, and large-artery atherosclerosis stroke) by using three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs198389, rs13107325, rs11105306) associated with NT-pro-BNP level (Johansson et al., 2016).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the MR assumptions. The arrows represent possible causal associations between variables. The dashed lines represent possible causal associations between variables that would violate the MR assumptions.

Manuscript Formatting

Methods

Selection of Instrumental Variables

To select SNPs associated with NT-proBNP as instrumental variables, the term “[(B-type natriuretic peptide) OR (Brain natriuretic peptide)] AND (Genome-wide association) (All Fields)” was searched in PubMed from 2005 to 2021, and the results showed a total of 34 articles (Supplementary Appendix). There are only five studies that found SNPs associated with NT-proBNP, of which the genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed by Johansson et al. (2016) was selected for our study (the retrieval process and inclusion/discharge criteria are shown in Figure 2). This GWAS of 18,624 individuals with acute coronary syndrome consisting of 99% European and 1% African or Asian identified two novel SNPs in SCL39A8 (rs13107325, pooled p = 5.99 × 10⁻¹⁰) and POC1B/GALANT4 (rs11105306, pooled p = 1.02 × 10⁻¹⁶) and confirmed one SNP (rs198389, pooled p = 1.07 × 10⁻¹⁵) that were all associated with the serum level of NT-proBNP. Among these three BNPs, rs198389 is proven to be associated with the level of NT-proBNP in several studies. The first study of this SNP was reported in 2007. This GWAS surrounding the natriuretic peptide precursor B (NPPB) gene with plasma BNP levels was performed in 2,970 adults from the general population (Takeishi et al., 2007). NPPB is on chromosome 1, encoding pre-proBNP. rs198389 is located in the NPPB promoter and has previously been found to influence promoter activity by interrupting an E-box consensus motif in the gene promoter (Meirhaeghe et al., 2007; Johansson et al., 2016). The rs13107325 is located in SLC39A8 on chromosome 4. It is a missense variant, which may cause an amino acid change at position 391 of the protein (Johansson et al., 2016). This substitution is predicted to be deleterious to the protein (Johansson et al., 2016). The rs11105306 is located in POC1B/GALANT4 on chromosome 12, which is in an intronic region with no obvious regulatory function (Johansson et al., 2016).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. The retrieval process and inclusion/discharge criteria of instrumental variables.

Outcome Data

The statistical data used for MR analysis of genetic associations with stroke was obtained from a multi-ancestry GWAS, including data from 521,612 individuals (67,162 cases and 454,450 controls) (Malik et al., 2018). These participants were selected from 29 investigations, consisting of ancestry groups from European (40,585 cases and 406,111 controls), East Asian (17,369 cases and 28,195 controls), African (5,541 cases and 15,154 controls), Latin American (865 cases and 692 controls), mixed Asian (365 cases and 333 controls), and South Asian (2,437 cases and 6,707 controls) (Malik et al., 2018). To avoid bias produced by a multi-ancestry population, we only used the data from the European group. The MEGASTROKE project was approved by relevant institutional review boards, and informed consent was obtained from each participant. The data set and basic information including sample size, age, and gender composition are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. The data set and basic information of the stroke GWAS in 2018.

Statistical Analysis

First, we conducted genetic association analysis to evaluate the association between single NT-proBNP-associated SNPs and ischemic stroke and its three subtypes (cardioembolism, small-vessel occlusion, and large-artery atherosclerosis strokes). The significance threshold is p < .005, considering that many association studies for a single test changed the p value from .05 to .005, and the results with p values between .05 and .005 were considered to be suggestive of significance. Second, we conducted the MR analysis using three MR methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger. IVW is the main MR analysis method, which combines the variant-specific Wald estimators by taking the inverse of their approximate variances as the corresponding weights (Bowden et al., 2016). Weighted median could derive consistent estimates when up to 50% of instruments are not valid (Bowden et al., 2016). MR-Egger could test the presence of potential pleiotropy and account for this potential pleiotropy using the MR-Egger intercept test (Burgess and Thompson, 2017). The odds ratio (OR) as well as 95% confidence interval (CI) of stroke corresponds to about 1 standard deviation (SD) in NT-proBNP level. All the statistical tests were completed using R Packages “Mendelian Randomization” (Yavorska and Burgess, 2017) and a p < .0042 (0.05/12 adjusted with Bonferroni method) was considered statistically significant; p between .05 and .0042 were considered suggestive of significance.

Results and Discussion

The genetic association analysis evaluating the association between single NT-proBNP-associated SNPs and ischemic stroke and its three subtypes shows that neither of those SNPs have significant association with ischemic stroke and subtypes, whereas only rs198389 has a suggestive association with LAS (95% CI 0.017∼0.116, p = .008686, .05 > p > .005) (Table 2). The MR analysis using three MR methods (IVW, weighted median, MR-Egger) shows no significant causal association between BNP levels and the risk of ischemic stroke. However, the weighted median and the IVW present suggestive association in small-vessel occlusion stroke (SVS) (weighted median: OR = −0.268, 95% CI −0.492∼−0.044, p = .019; IVW: OR = −0.199, 95% CI −0.389∼−0.009, p = .040) with no horizontal pleiotropy, which was identified with the MR-egger method (p = .499) (Table 3; Figure 3). In conclusion, the genetic association analysis shows that rs198389 has a suggestive association with LAS, and the MR analysis shows that NT-proBNP levels suggestively reduce the risk of SVS.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. The genetic association analysis of BNPs and ischemic stroke and its subtypes.

TABLE 3

TABLE 3. MR analysis of association between 3 BNPs (rs198389, rs13107325, rs11105306) and ischemic stroke and its subtypes.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. The forest plot of the MR analysis.

Analysis of the Negative Results

This MR study overcomes confounding risk factors and shows that there is no significant causal association between BNP levels and the risk of ischemic stroke, which is contrary to the results of most previous prospective studies. The discrepancy therein may be ascribed to the negligence of some hidden risk factors for stroke, which may cause BNP levels to rise without any causal association with stroke. In 2013, in a random community-based sample, Cannone et al. found that rs5065 was associated with increased cardiovascular risk by analyzing the phenotype associated with atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) genetic variant rs5065. The rs5065 is a genetic variant and its minor allele encodes for an ANP with two additional arginines at the C-terminus, ANP-RR. This research also found that the endothelial hyperpermeability induced by chronic exposure to ANP-RR may predispose the subject to atherosclerotic disease. Interestingly, the minor allele of rs5065 is associated with higher BNP plasma values. The researchers hypothesized that higher levels of BNP might be originated from the deleterious effects caused by ANP-RR on the heart although it did not reveal any other CAD signs (Cannone et al., 2013). The rs5065 causes both ANP-RR and BNP levels to increase, but only ANP-RR is the causal factor. Pathways such as this may exist in the incidence of stroke and lead to controversial results. Although some evidence suggests causal relationship between natriuretic peptides and endothelial permeability, which might predispose to atherosclerosis and hemorrhages, some research shows that BNP may also have anti-inflammatory endothelial actions (Kuhn, 2012). These two actions are contrary to each other, which may explain the difference between the results mentioned above and our result.

Possible Explanations of the Suggestive Associations

The contradiction stated in the previous paragraph leads us to focus on the suggestive associations found in this study. The genetic association analysis shows that rs198389 alone has a suggestive association with LAS. The MR analysis shows that NT-proBNP levels have a suggestive positive causal effect on LAS in MR-Egger analysis (OR = 2.042, 95% CI 0.263–3.821, p = .024), but the MR-Egger intercept (95%CI −0.676∼−0.066, p = .017) is significantly different from zero, showing a pleiotropic effect on this outcome. The origin of loci may affect the results. In this study, the rs198389 locus came from a large population without special classification, and the other two loci came from people with ACS in GWAS performed by Johansson et al. In our study, genes as instrumental variables need to be absolutely associated with exposure factors. However, the association between NT-proBNP and the loci found in ACS patients is questionable. Therefore, we cannot conclude that NT-proBNP has no causal relationship with stroke merely based on this study. We chose the GWAS performed by Johansson et al. as the SNPs source because it has the largest sample size among all of the available GWAS of NT-proBNP (Figure 2). This is based on the idea that many of the current limitations of GWAS can be overcome to some extent by increasing sample sizes, which makes GWAS with larger sample sizes more reliable (Tam et al., 2019). Therefore, GWAS of NT-proBNP in general populations with a large sample size is anticipated to explore the relationship between SNP and stroke more accurately.

Interestingly, in our study, it is also implied that the serum level of NT-proBNP suggestively reduces the risk of SVS. The role of BNP in lowering blood pressure may be involved in the mechanism behind this phenomenon. BNP is released from the heart muscle in response to blood pressure and volume overload. Its main effects are reducing the preload of the heart by promoting diuresis and capillary permeability, which results in the reduction of the blood pressure (Goetze et al., 2020). In 2013, Wang et al. performed a retrospective study on the association between hypertension and different ischemic stroke subtypes, which involved 11,560 patients with ischemic stroke. The results show that hypertension is significantly related to recurrent stroke in patients with SVS, but not other subtypes of ischemic stroke (Wang et al., 2013). Taken together, we conclude that BNP can reduce the risk of SVS by lowering blood pressure. Whether BNP can reduce the risk of SVS needs to be verified by more accurate and credible studies in the future, which will help us form a better understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of SVS.

Strengths and Limitations

Our MR study has several strengths. First, stroke is a complex disease with a large number of risk factors and pathophysiological pathways. However, in this study, the relationship between NT-proBNP and stroke was studied at the gene level with a large sample size and directly from the gene, which reduces the possibility of interference from implied risk factors. Second, in this study, the potential confounding factors caused by linkage disequilibrium may be reduced by using three independent genetic variants as instrumental variables. Third, we selected three MR methods to enhance the robustness of estimates. Fourth, three-stage pleiotropy analysis were performed, which may decrease the risk of pleiotropy.

Some limitations still exist in this MR analysis. First, the additional confounders cannot be completely ruled out as well as for the pleiotropy present in any MR study. Second, the obtained analysis results may be influenced by the population stratification, which cannot be fully ruled out. Third, the genetic relationship between NT-proBNP levels and stroke risk may be different in diverse genetic ancestries or ethnicities.

This genetic association should be further evaluated in other ancestries. Fourth, a replication study should be performed to ensure the accuracy and rigor of our original study. However, the GWAS of stroke we used as outcome data had very large sample size. It conducted meta-analyses of 29 studies, which involved every large size of stroke-related database before 2018. As we know, there are no other relative studies that have approximately the same order of magnitude as the previous GWAS. Replication studies should be performed with another large GWAS of ischemic stroke.

Conclusion

This research provides evidence that there is no causal relationship between elevated NT-proBNP level and the risk of stroke. It is ineffective to use NT-proBNP as the target for stroke treatment and prevention. NT-proBNP plays an important role in ischemic stroke, but its function is not completely clear, and its association with stroke needs to be further explored.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

ML and YX wrote the first draft of the manuscript; YX performed the data collection and statistical analysis; JW, CW, and AL contributed to manuscript revision; ML and XJ contributed conception and design of the study; XJ takes full responsibility for the data, the analyses and interpretation, and the conduct of the research. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 82102220, 82027802, 61975017, 82071468), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (721220) and General Projects of Scientific and Technological Plan of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM202010025023).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the people who participated in this study for their cooperation.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.795479/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

AAE, Age at examination; AAO, Age at onset; ACS, Acute coronary syndromes; AIS, Acute ischemic stroke; ANP, Atrial natriuretic peptide; ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; BNP, Brain natriuretic peptide; CAD, Coronary artery disease; CES, Cardioembolism stroke; CI, Confidence interval; GWAS, Genome-wide association study; IVW, Inverse-variance weighted; LAS, Large-artery atherosclerosis stroke; MR, Mendelian randomization; NPPB, Natriuretic peptide precursor B; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OR, Odds ratio; SD, Standard deviation; SNP, Single-nucleotide polymorphism; SVS, Small-vessel occlusion stroke.

References

Bhatia, R., Warrier, A. R., Sreenivas, V., Bali, P., Sisodia, P., Gupta, A., et al. (2020). Role of Blood Biomarkers in Differentiating Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurol. India 68 (4), 824–829. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.293467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C., and Burgess, S. (2016). Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 40 (4), 304–314. doi:10.1002/gepi.21965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burgess, S., and Thompson, S. G. (2017). Interpreting Findings from Mendelian Randomization Using the MR-Egger Method. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 32 (5), 377–389. doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cannone, V., Huntley, B. K., Olson, T. M., Heublein, D. M., Scott, C. G., Bailey, K. R., et al. (2013). Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Genetic Variant Rs5065 and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in the General Community: a 9-year Follow-Up Study. Hypertension 62 (5), 860–865. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.01344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Venkat, P., Seyfried, D., Chopp, M., Yan, T., and Chen, J. (2017). Brain-Heart Interaction: Cardiac Complications after Stroke. Circ. Res. 121 (4), 451–468. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cushman, M., Judd, S. E., Howard, V. J., Kissela, B., Gutiérrez, O. M., Jenny, N. S., et al. (2014). N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide and Stroke Risk: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Cohort. Stroke 45 (6), 1646–1650. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.114.004712

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daniels, L. B., and Maisel, A. S. (2007). Natriuretic Peptides. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50 (25), 2357–2368. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Castelnuovo, A., Veronesi, G., Costanzo, S., Zeller, T., Schnabel, R. B., de Curtis, A., et al. (2019). NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide) and the Risk of Stroke. Stroke 50 (3), 610–617. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.118.023218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Donkor, E. S. (2018). Stroke in the21stCentury: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life. Stroke Res. Treat. 2018, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/3238165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Etgen, T., Baum, H., Sander, K., and Sander, D. (2005). Cardiac Troponins and N-Terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Ischemic Stroke Do Not Relate to Clinical Prognosis. Stroke 36 (2), 270–275. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000151364.19066.a1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folsom, A. R., Nambi, V., Bell, E. J., Oluleye, O. W., Gottesman, R. F., Lutsey, P. L., et al. (2013). N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide, and Incidence of Stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Stroke 44 (4), 961–967. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.000173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-Berrocoso, T., Fernández-Cadenas, I., Delgado, P., Rosell, A., and Montaner, J. (2010). Blood Biomarkers in Cardioembolic Stroke. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 6 (3), 194–201. doi:10.2174/157340310791658767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-Berrocoso, T., Giralt, D., Bustamante, A., Etgen, T., Jensen, J. K., Sharma, J. C., et al. (2013). B-type Natriuretic Peptides and Mortality after Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurology 81 (23), 1976–1985. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000436937.32410.32

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giannakoulas, G., Hatzitolios, A., Karvounis, H., Koliakos, G., Charitandi, A., Dimitroulas, T., et al. (2005). N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Are Elevated in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Angiology 56 (6), 723–730. doi:10.1177/000331970505600610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goetze, J. P., Bruneau, B. G., Ramos, H. R., Ogawa, T., de Bold, M. K., and de Bold, A. J. (2020). Cardiac Natriuretic Peptides. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17 (11), 698–717. doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0381-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzales-Portillo, C., Ishikawa, H., Shinozuka, K., Tajiri, N., Kaneko, Y., and Borlongan, C. V. (2016). Stroke and Cardiac Cell Death: Two Peas in a Pod. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 142, 145–147. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harpaz, D., Seet, R. C. S., Marks, R. S., and Tok, A. I. Y. (2020). B-type Natriuretic Peptide as a Significant Brain Biomarker for Stroke Triaging Using a Bedside Point-of-Care Monitoring Biosensor. Biosensors (Basel) 10 (9). doi:10.3390/bios10090107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hotsuki, Y., Sato, Y., Yoshihisa, A., Watanabe, K., Kimishima, Y., Kiko, T., et al. (2020). B-type Natriuretic Peptide Is Associated with post-discharge Stroke in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure. ESC Heart Fail. 7 (5), 2508–2515. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson, Å., Eriksson, N., Lindholm, D., Varenhorst, C., James, S., Syvänen, A. C., et al. (2016). Genome-wide Association and Mendelian Randomization Study of NT-proBNP in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25 (7), 1447–1456. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, S., and Kamal, M. A. (2020). Cardiac Biomarkers in Stroke, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementia. Are They of Use? A Brief Overview of Data from Recent Investigations. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 20 (8), 687–693. doi:10.2174/1871527319666201005171003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M. H., Kang, S. Y., Kim, M. C., and Lee, W. I. (2010). Plasma Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 40 (4), 336–341.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kuhn, M. (2012). Endothelial Actions of Atrial and B-type Natriuretic Peptides. Br. J. Pharmacol. 166 (2), 522–531. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01827.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J. M., Zhai, G., Liu, Q., Gonzales, E. R., Yin, K., Yan, P., et al. (2007). Vascular Permeability Precedes Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Stroke 38 (12), 3289–3291. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.491621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, K., Kazmi, K. S., Law, M., Babb, J., Peccerelli, N., and Pramanik, B. K. (2007). Measuring Elevated Microvascular Permeability and Predicting Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using First-Pass Dynamic Perfusion CT Imaging. AJNR Am. J. neuroradiology 28 (7), 1292–1298. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0539

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malik, R., Chauhan, G., Traylor, M., Sargurupremraj, M., and Yamaji, T. (2018). Multiancestry Genome-wide Association Study of 520,000 Subjects Identifies 32 Loci Associated with Stroke and Stroke Subtypes. Nat. Genet. 50 (4), 524–537. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medranda, G. A., Salhab, K., Schwartz, R., and Green, S. J. (2020). Prognostic Implications of Baseline B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am. J. Cardiol. 130, 94–99. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meirhaeghe, A., Sandhu, M. S., McCarthy, M. I., de Groote, P., Cottel, D., Arveiler, D., et al. (2007). Association between the T-381C Polymorphism of the Brain Natriuretic Peptide Gene and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Human Populations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16 (11), 1343–1350. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Donnell, M. J., Chin, S. L., Rangarajan, S., Xavier, D., Liu, L., Zhang, H., et al. (2016). Global and Regional Effects of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Acute Stroke in 32 Countries (INTERSTROKE): a Case-Control Study. Lancet (London, England) 388 (10046), 761–775. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30506-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quan, H. X., Jin, J. Y., Wen, J. F., and Cho, K. W. (2010). beta(1)-Adrenergic Receptor Activation Decreases ANP Release via cAMP-Ca2+ Signaling in Perfused Beating Rabbit Atria. Life Sci. 87 (7-8), 246–253. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2010.06.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Castro, E., Hervella, P., López-Dequidt, I., Arias-Rivas, S., Santamaría-Cadavid, M., López-Loureiro, I., et al. (2020). NT-pro-BNP: A Novel Predictor of Stroke Risk after Transient Ischemic Attack. Int. J. Cardiol. 298, 93–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubattu, S., Stanzione, R., Cotugno, M., Bianchi, F., Marchitti, S., and Forte, M. (2020). Epigenetic Control of Natriuretic Peptides: Implications for Health and Disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 77 (24), 5121–5130. doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03573-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubattu, S., Volpe, M., Kreutz, R., Ganten, U., Ganten, D., and Lindpaintner, K. (1996). Chromosomal Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Contributing to Stroke in a Rat Model of Complex Human Disease. Nat. Genet. 13 (4), 429–434. doi:10.1038/ng0896-429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scheitz, J. F., Nolte, C. H., Doehner, W., Hachinski, V., and Endres, M. (2018). Stroke–heart Syndrome: Clinical Presentation and Underlying Mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 17 (12), 1109–1120. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30336-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirotani, S., Minami, Y., Saito, C., Haruki, S., and Hagiwara, N. (2020). B-type Natriuretic Peptide and Outcome in Patients with Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiol. 76 (4), 357–363. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.03.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takeishi, Y., Toriyama, S., Takabatake, N., Shibata, Y., Konta, T., Emi, M., et al. (2007). Linkage Disequilibrium Analyses of Natriuretic Peptide Precursor B Locus Reveal Risk Haplotype Conferring High Plasma BNP Levels. Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun. 362 (2), 480–484. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tam, V., Patel, N., Turcotte, M., Bosse, Y., Pare, G., and Meyre, D. (2019). Benefits and Limitations of Genome-wide Association Studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20 (8), 467–484. doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tonomura, S., Ihara, M., and Friedland, R. P. (2020). Microbiota in Cerebrovascular Disease: A Key Player and Future Therapeutic Target. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 40 (7), 1368–1380. doi:10.1177/0271678x20918031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, A., Zhang, M., Ding, Y., Mo, X., Zhong, C., Zhu, Z., et al. (2020). Associations of B-type Natriuretic Peptide and its Coding Gene Promoter Methylation with Functional Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Mediation Analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9 (18), e017499. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.017499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Xu, J., Zhao, X., Wang, D., Wang, C., Liu, L., et al. (2013). Association of Hypertension with Stroke Recurrence Depends on Ischemic Stroke Subtype. Stroke 44 (5), 1232–1237. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watson, C. J., Tea, I., O'Connell, E., Glezeva, N., Zhou, S., James, S., et al. (2020). Comparison of Longitudinal Change in sST2 vs BNP to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Asymptomatic Patients in the Community. J. Cel Mol Med 24 (11), 6495–6499. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H. L., Lin, Y. P., Long, Y., Ma, Q. L., and Zhou, C. (2014). Predicting Cardioembolic Stroke with the B-type Natriuretic Peptide Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 23 (7), 1882–1889. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.02.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, M., Tao, L., An, H., Liu, G., Tu, Q., Zhang, H., et al. (2020). A Novel Nomogram to Predict All-Cause Readmission or Death Risk in Chinese Elderly Patients with Heart Failure. ESC Heart Fail. 7 (3), 1015–1024. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yavorska, O. O., and Burgess, S. (2017). MendelianRandomization: an R Package for Performing Mendelian Randomization Analyses Using Summarized Data. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46 (6), 1734–1739. doi:10.1093/ije/dyx034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., et al. (2004). Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries (The INTERHEART Study): Case-Control Study. The Lancet 364 (9438), 937–952. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J. J., Zhang, Y., Yuan, F., Song, C. G., Jiang, Y. L., Gao, Q., et al. (2020). Diagnostic Value of N-Terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study. J. Neurol. Sci., 414, 116822. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.116822

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y. H., Gao, H., Pan, Z. Y., Li, J., Huang, W. H., Wang, Z. F., et al. (2020). Prognostic Value of NT-proBNP after Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. J. stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 29 (4), 104659. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar