Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Genet., 16 September 2021
Sec. Computational Genomics
This article is part of the Research Topic Applications of Metagenomics in Studying Human Cancer View all 9 articles

Editorial: Applications of Metagenomics in Studying Human Cancer

  • 1School of Electrical Engineering, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, China
  • 2Geneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
  • 3College of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
  • 4School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

Metagenomics is defined as analysis of DNA obtained directly from the environment (Hugenholtz and Tyson, 2008) and is also referred to as environmental genomics, ecogenomics or community genomics (Handelsman 2004). Recent studies have reported that microbial infection might be responsible for about 16.1% of cancers (Banerjee et al., 2015). For example, Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) might be closely associated with cirrhosis, liver cancers and Cholangiocarcinoma (Perz et al., 2006; Matsumoto et al., 2014), HCV infection contributed much to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (Saito et al., 1990), and a large portion of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection played a crucial role in the development of cervical carcinoma (An et al., 2003). More importantly, roles of the microbiota differ significantly with types of cancers. Therefore, to explore metagenomics of cancers is helpful to shed light on the underlying mechanisms of cancer as well as promote microbe-mediated cancer drug development.

With development of sequencing techniques, many methods have been developed for analyzing metagenomics of cancers in the past decade, including experimental and computational methods (Zhang et al., 2019; Fadiji and Babalola, 2020). However, there are still barriers to be solved in the exploring metagenomics-related cancers (Laudadio et al., 2019). Both computational and experimental methods on metagenomics are still in their early stages and more focus should be put into this promising area. This Research Topic serves as a forum to discuss new methods of analyzing metagenomics-related cancers.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common female malignant tumors (Ryan et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2019). The presence of poor prognostic factors driving tumor recurrence contributed much to mortality of EC patients (Coll-De La Rubia et al., 2020). Zhang et al. employed the bioinformatics tools to explore role of E2F family in EC. Zhang et al. found that expressions of E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F7, and E2F8 were significantly upregulated and the expressions of E2F4 were downregulated in EC tissues. This finding implied clinical potential of E2F family in preventing and treating EC.

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is a well-recognized and heterogeneous clinical disorder, one of the 10 most common malignancies in developed countries, accounting for 3–5% of cancers in both men and women and (Pavlidis and Pentheroudakis, 2010). Identifying tissue of origin is crucial to early diagnose and treat CUP (Zhao et al., 2020). Zhang et al. developed an XGBoost-based method for predicting cancer tissue-of-origin by using copy number variations. This method might be potential for identifying the actual clinic pathological status of specific cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common female malignant tumor, which is of extremely high morbidity and mortality (Wang et al., 2017). The cancer cells interact inevitably with the immune system during the process of cancer development, which might inhibit or enhance tumor growth (Vinay et al., 2015). Understanding deeply immune evasion mechanism of BC is critical to develop immunotherapies for breast cancer. Chen et al.presented a multi-source data fusion scheme to investigate regulatory mechanism of BC immune evasion.

Long non-coding RNA is a type of RNA with more than 200 nucleotides, which are not translated into proteins (Perkel 2013). Accumulating evidences showed that lncRNAs were closely associated with human cancers (Gutschner and Diederichs, 2012). The aberrance of lncRNA was involved in a large variety of cancers (Gibb et al., 2011). Little was known about functional roles of the lncRNAs in the cancers. Zhu et al. developed a decision tree-based method for identifying cancer-related lncRNAs. Zhu et al. also used the GO and the KEGG pathway to encode lncRNA, and employed Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) (Peng et al., 2005) to select discriminative GO and KEGG terms. The selected GO and KEGG terms were helpful to shed light on regulating mechanisms of lncRNAs in tumorigenesis. The glioma is a type of brain tumor, accounting for 30% of all brain tumors, and 80% of malignant brain tumours (Goodenberger and Jenkins, 2012). Xu et al. explored the prognostic value of MEG3 which is a maternally expressed and imprinted long non-coding RNA gene, and investigated correlations with immune infiltrates in Gliomas. Xu et al. found that expressions of MEG3 were strongly related to the multiple immune markers in gliomas, especially in low-grade glioma, implying potential immunotherapeutic target for gliomas.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most frequent subtype of kidney cancer (Network 2013). Most of ccRCC are of metastase which is main cause of mortality for ccRCC (Casuscelli et al., 2019). Finding difference in expressed profiles of genes in primary metastatic ccRCC is fundamental to understand metastasis mechanism of ccRCC. Gao et al. identified a metastasis-associated gene signature of ccRCC by bioinformatics analysis on two gene expression profiles (GSE105261 and GSE85258) which were downloaded from the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). This might provide new insights into therapeutic and early diagnostic biomarkers of ccRCC.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, with which over 80% patients occurred in the developing countries (Yang and Roberts, 2010). Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved intracellular mechanism (Yazdani et al., 2019), playing versatile roles in cellular process including removal of unnecessary or dysfunctional components (Klionsky 2008) and recycling of cellular components (Mizushima and Komatsu, 2011; Kobayashi 2015). It was reported that autophagy played dual roles in the HCC. The autophagy can inhibit but can promote development of HCC. HCC is of poor prognosis. Wang et al. presented a multivariate Cox model for exploring the influence of autophagy-related genes (AAGs) on the prognosis of HCC. This model is potential to promote the overall survival rate of HCC patients.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease and its mechanism is poorly understood (Burns and Iliffe, 2009). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) refers to the substitution of a single nucleotide at a specific position in the genome. SNP was associated with many disease including AD. Zhou et al. presented a multiple-step method for exploring association between SNP and brain region of interest related to AD.

Author Contributions

GH, JY, LC, and TW wrote the Editorial.

Conflict of Interest

Author JY was employed by the company Geneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

An, H. J., Cho, N. H., Lee, S. Y., Kim, I. H., Lee, C., Kim, S. J., et al. (2003). Correlation of cervical carcinoma and precancerous lesions with human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes detected with the HPV DNA chip microarray method. Cancer 97, 1672–1680. doi:10.1002/cncr.11235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banerjee, J., Mishra, N., and Dhas, Y. (2015). Metagenomics: A new horizon in cancer research. Meta Gene 5, 84–89. doi:10.1016/j.mgene.2015.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burns, A., and Iliffe, S. (2009). Alzheimer's disease. BMJ 338, b158. doi:10.1136/bmj.b158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casuscelli, J., Becerra, M. F., Manley, B. J., Zabor, E. C., Reznik, E., Redzematovic, A., et al. (2019). Characterization and impact of TERT promoter region mutations on clinical outcome in renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. focus 5, 642–649. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coll-de la Rubia, E., Martinez-Garcia, E., Dittmar, G., Gil-Moreno, A., Cabrera, S., and Colas, E. (2020). Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Jcm 9, 1900. doi:10.3390/jcm9061900

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fadiji, A. E., and Babalola, O. O. (2020). Metagenomics methods for the study of plant-associated microbial communities: a review. J. Microbiol. Methods 170, 105860. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibb, E. A., Brown, C. J., and Lam, W. L. (2011). The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol. Cancer 10, 38. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-10-38

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goodenberger, M. L., and Jenkins, R. B. (2012). Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet. 205, 613–621. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gutschner, T., and Diederichs, S. (2012). The hallmarks of cancer. RNA Biol. 9, 703–719. doi:10.4161/rna.20481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanchuan Peng, H., Fuhui Long, L., and Ding, C. (2005). Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 27, 1226–1238. doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Handelsman, J. (2004). Metagenomics: Application of Genomics to Uncultured Microorganisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 669–685. doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.4.669-685.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P., and Tyson, G. W. (2008). Metagenomics. Nature 455, 481–483. doi:10.1038/455481a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klionsky, D. J. (2008). Autophagy revisited: a conversation with Christian de Duve. Autophagy 4, 740–743. doi:10.4161/auto.6398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S. (2015). Choose Delicately and Reuse Adequately: The Newly Revealed Process of Autophagy. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 38, 1098–1103. doi:10.1248/bpb.b15-00096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laudadio, I., Fulci, V., Stronati, L., and Carissimi, C. (2019). Next-Generation Metagenomics: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities. OMICS: A J. Integr. Biol. 23, 327–333. doi:10.1089/omi.2019.0073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Zhou, S., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Wan, Y., Ma, X., et al. (2019). Eleven genes associated with progression and prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) identified by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. Cancer Cel Int 19, 136. doi:10.1186/s12935-019-0859-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsumoto, K., Onoyama, T., Kawata, S., Takeda, Y., Harada, K., Ikebuchi, Y., et al. (2014). Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection is a Risk Factor for the Development of Cholangiocarcinoma. Intern. Med. 53, 651–654. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mizushima, N., and Komatsu, M. (2011). Autophagy: Renovation of Cells and Tissues. Cell 147, 728–741. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Network, C. G. A. R. (2013). Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 499, 43–49. doi:10.1038/nature12222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pavlidis, N., and Pentheroudakis, G. (2010). Cancer of unknown primary site: 20 questions to be answered. Ann. Oncol. 21 Suppl 7, vii303–7. vii303-vii307. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perkel, J. M. (2013). Visiting “Noncodarnia”. BioTechniques 54, 301–304. doi:10.2144/000114037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perz, J. F., Armstrong, G. L., Farrington, L. A., Hutin, Y. J. F., and Bell, B. P. (2006). The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J. Hepatol. 45, 529–538. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryan, A. J., Susil, B., Jobling, T. W., and Oehler, M. K. (2005). Endometrial cancer. Cell Tissue Res 322, 53–61. doi:10.1007/s00441-005-1109-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saito, I., Miyamura, T., Ohbayashi, A., Harada, H., Katayama, T., Kikuchi, S., et al. (1990). Hepatitis C virus infection is associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87, 6547–6549. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.17.6547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinay, D. S., Ryan, E. P., Pawelec, G., Talib, W. H., Stagg, J., Elkord, E., et al. (2015). Immune evasion in cancer: Mechanistic basis and therapeutic strategies. Semin. Cancer Biol. 35, S185–S198. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Zhang, C., Song, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Luo, F., et al. (2017). Mechanism of immune evasion in breast cancer. Ott Vol. 10, 1561–1573. doi:10.2147/ott.s126424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J. D., and Roberts, L. R. (2010). Hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 448–458. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2010.100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yazdani, H., Huang, H., and Tsung, A. (2019). Autophagy: Dual Response in the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cells 8, 91. doi:10.3390/cells8020091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Loh, K.-C., Lim, J. W., and Zhang, J. (2019). Bioinformatics analysis of metagenomics data of biogas-producing microbial communities in anaerobic digesters: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 100, 110–126. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Pan, Z., Namburi, S., Pattison, A., Posner, A., Balachander, S., et al. (2020). CUP-AI-Dx: A tool for inferring cancer tissue of origin and molecular subtype using RNA gene-expression data and artificial intelligence. EBioMedicine 61, 103030. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: metagenomics, cancer, microbe, next generation sequencing, functional gene screening

Citation: Huang G, Yang J, Chen L and Wu T (2021) Editorial: Applications of Metagenomics in Studying Human Cancer. Front. Genet. 12:760141. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.760141

Received: 17 August 2021; Accepted: 06 September 2021;
Published: 16 September 2021.

Edited and reviewed by:

Richard D. Emes, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2021 Huang, Yang, Chen and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guohua Huang, guohuahhn@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.