Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 13 August 2021
Sec. Evolutionary and Population Genetics
This article is part of the Research Topic Early Domestication and Artificial Selection of Animals View all 10 articles

Genetic Diversity of MHC B-F/B-L Region in 21 Chicken Populations

  • 1National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
  • 2United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, United States
  • 3Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
  • 4College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

The chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 16 is the most polymorphic region across the whole genome, and also an ideal model for genetic diversity investigation. The MHC B-F/B-L region is 92 kb in length with high GC content consisting of 18 genes and one pseudogene (Blec4), which plays important roles in immune response. To evaluate polymorphism of the Chinese indigenous chickens as well as to analyze the effect of selection to genetic diversity, we used WaferGen platform to identify sequence variants of the B-F/B-L region in 21 chicken populations, including the Red Jungle Fowl (RJF), Cornish (CS), White Leghorns (WLs), 16 Chinese domestic breeds, and two well-known inbred lines 63 and 72. A total of 3,319 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and 181 INDELs in the B-F/B-L region were identified among 21 populations, of which 2,057 SNPs (62%) and 159 INDELs (88%) were novel. Most of the variants were within the intron and the flanking regions. The average variation density was 36 SNPs and 2 INDELs per kb, indicating dramatical high diversity of this region. Furthermore, BF2 was identified as the hypervariable genes with 67 SNPs per kb. Chinese domestic populations showed higher diversity than the WLs and CS. The indigenous breeds, Nandan Yao (NY), Xishuangbanna Game (XG), Gushi (GS), and Xiayan (XY) chickens, were the top four with the highest density of SNPs and INDELs. The highly inbred lines 63 and 72 have the lowest diversity, which might be resulted from a long-term intense selection for decades. Collectively, we refined the genetic map of chicken MHC B-F/B-L region, and illustrated genetic diversity of 21 chicken populations. Abundant genetic variants were identified, which not only strikingly expanded the current Ensembl SNP database, but also provided comprehensive data for researchers to further investigate association between variants in MHC and immune traits.

Introduction

China has the most abundant resources of domestic chickens, which possess highly genetic polymorphisms. As a highly polymorphic region across the genome, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a group of tightly linked genes, encoding major histocompatibility antigens, which discriminate between self and non-self cells and regulate immune responses. MHC is closely related to disease resistance and production performance of animals (Bacon, 1987). Chicken MHC-B and MHC-Y regions reside on the micro-chromosome 16, which are located on the same side of nucleolar organizing region (NOR) (Miller and Taylor, 2016). MHC-B and MHC-Y are inherited independently because they are separated by a GC rich region (Miller et al., 2004). Until now, 46 genes within a 2,41,833 bp in MHC-B were identified (Shiina et al., 2007), including three highly polymorphic gene groups: BF, BL, and BG, which encode class I, class II, and class IV glycoproteins on cell surface, respectively (Lamont et al., 1987). The encoded proteins play important roles in rapid allograft rejection, immune response and determining susceptibility/resistance to pathogen infections (Pazderka et al., 1975; Plachy et al., 1992; Kaufman, 2018).

The BF/BL region (Guillemot et al., 1988), a 92-kb core region with a relatively high GC content (Shiina et al., 2007), has been described as a minimal essential MHC region since it contains two classical class I (B-F), two classical class II B (B-LB) genes, and some other genes involved in antigen processing and presentation (Bacon, 1987). This region contains 18 genes and 1 pseudogene (Blec4) (Lamont et al., 1987; Kaufman et al., 1995), of which, two MHC class I genes BF1 and BF2 encode α chain of BF antigen (Ewald and Livant, 2004). BLB1 and BLB2 encode β chains of classic MHC class II molecules (Lamont, 1989; Zekarias et al., 2002). MHC is a polymorphic region that has numerous SNPs and INDELs (Wong et al., 2004), and its variations can represent the whole genome-level variation to evaluate genomic diversity and population history (Yuhki and Obrien, 1990). The microsatellite locus LEI0258, a tetranucleotide repeat system located within the BF/BL region, has been used to analyze population genetic diversity, structure, distinctiveness, and relationships between populations (McConnell et al., 1999; Fulton et al., 2006; Izadi et al., 2011; Chang et al., 2012). Huang et al. (2016) used LEI0258 to examine the genetic diversity and evolutionary history of south China domestic chickens and revealed that south China domestic chickens mainly originated from the Red Jungle Fowl (RJF). Han et al. (2013) found high genetic diversity of the MHC region in Chinese indigenous chickens by assessing genetic information on LEI0258. In addition to LEI0258, there are also many microsatellite loci such as MCW0370 and MCW0371. The use of these high polymorphism markers is of great significance for the study of chicken MHC diversity (Esmailnejad et al., 2017; Manjula et al., 2021).

However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no single-base-resolution polymorphism description of MHC BF/BL region in Chinese domestic chickens. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the polymorphisms of BF/BL region among 16 Chinese domestic populations, as well as White Leghorns (WLs), Cornish (CS), RJFs, and two high inbred lines (lines 63 and 72) (Waters, 1945; Stone, 1975; Bacon et al., 2000) using the WaferGen platform, which is a more cost-effective method for identifying variations in targeted regions (De Wilde et al., 2014).

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All experimental procedures and used animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University.

Sample Selection

A total of 195 chickens from 21 populations were used in this study. Sixteen were Chinese domestic chicken populations (Table 1), including Dagu (DG, n = 9), Wenchang (WC, n = 10), Wuding (WD, n = 10), Xiayan (XY, n = 10), Xishuangbanna Game (XG, n = 10), Luxi Game (LX, n = 7), Gushi (GS, n = 10), Wenshang Barred chicken (WS, n = 10), Nandan Yao (NY, n = 10), Yunyang Black-bone chicken (YY, n = 10), Tibetan (TB, n = 10), Beijing You (BY, n = 10), Chahua (CH, n = 10), Dongxiang Blue-eggshell chicken (DX, n = 10), Shouguang (SG, n = 10), and Silkie (SK, n = 10). Two introduced populations were CS(n = 10) and WL(n = 10). The blood samples of first ten local breeds were collected previously by our colleagues from local chicken breed preservation farm. The blood samples of latter six local breeds as well as CS and WL were from Experimental Farm of Poultry Resource in China Agricultural University. The individuals were randomly selected for the assay. RJF (n = 3) was also included in this study, and DNA was kindly provided by Dr. Xiaoxiang Hu. Two highly inbred WL lines 63 (n = 8) and 72 (n = 8) were that were cultivated by the Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory (ADOL) of the United States Department of Agriculture. After decades of breeding, the inbreeding coefficient of the two lines reached 99%. Serological tests showed that the two lines have the same MHC B haplotype (B2). Although they have the same haplotype, there were significant differences in Marek’s disease (MD) resistance: line 63 is resistant to MD tumors but susceptible to both Marek’s disease virus (MDV) and avian leukosis virus (ALV). Conversely, the line 72 is resistant to ALV infection but susceptible to both MDV and MD tumors (Waters, 1945; Stone, 1975; Bacon et al., 2000). DNA of line 72 and 63 were extracted from spleens.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The distribution of domestic chicken breeds in China.

Target Enrichment Sequencing

Genome DNA were extracted from blood or tissue samples using DNA extraction kit (TIANGEN). The purity, concentration, and volume of the extracted DNA were tested. WaferGen Smartchip platform was used to perform highly parallelized PCR for the target region and the procedure was followed that by De Wilde et al. (2014). There were total of 431 amplicons were designed using tiling settings, taking into account known SNP positions and with a target annealing temperature of 60°C to cover target region (approximately 92 kb B-F/B-L region on chromosome 16). Primer3 (Version 2.3.7) global settings for primer design, length setting of amplicons were as follows: 250–300 bp and 301–350 bp, primer length: 18–30 nt, primer pair_max_diff_Tm: 3°C, and primer TM: 58–62°C (60°C as optimal). Primers were listed in Supplementary Table 1. Specific barcodes were added to each sample. Parallelized PCR were cycled in the SmartChip Cycler (WaferGen Biosystems). Library was constructed by PCR pool. The concentration of PCR pool was measured using the dsDNA assay kit on the Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen) and fragment analysis occurred on BioAnalyzer 2100 (Agilent). The library was sequenced by MiSeq platform.

Reads Mapping and Variant Calling

Chicken reference genome assembly (Galgal6 version) was download from NCBI.1 Trimmomatic (Trimmomatic 0.39) was used to obtain clean reads, and the parameter of quality control was as follows: SLIDINGWINDOW:5:20 LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 MINLEN:36 (Bolger et al., 2014). SAMtools (Samtools 1.9) was used to create an index of the reference sequence (Li et al., 2009). Burrows–Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA-0.7.17) was used to mapping reads to the reference genome with the command “mem -t 10 -M” (Li and Durbin, 2010). The alignment data stream was piped to SAMtools and converted to a BAM file, which was then sorted according to the reference genome. The MarkDuplicates module in Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK-4.1.3.0) was used to remove duplicated reads (McKenna et al., 2010). GATK HaplotypeCaller module and GATK GenotypeGVCFs module were used to convert BAM files to GVCF files and then switched to VCF files. The GATK VariantFiltration module was used to hard-filter SNP and INDEL. For SNP, we excluded potential false variants following these criteria: QUAL < 30.0 ∣∣ QD < 2.0 ∣∣ FS > 60.0 ∣∣ MQ < 40.0 ∣∣ SOR > 3.0 ∣∣ MQRankSum < −12.5 ∣∣ ReadPosRankSum < −8.0. For INDEL, we took out variants with the following parameters: QUAL < 30.0 ∣∣ QD < 2.0 ∣∣ FS > 200.0 ∣∣ SOR > 10.0 ∣∣ MQRankSum < −12.5 ∣∣ ReadPosRankSum < −20.0. The variants with multiple alleles were also excluded. SNPs was identified using the criteria of filtering minor allele frequency (MAF)<0.01 and missing genotype>10% in the 21 chicken populations. Subsequently, the Variants Effect Predictor (VEP) on Ensembl was used to annotate variants.

Comparison Between Chickens Showing MD Resistance and Susceptibility

Comparisons were conducted between the line 63 and line 72. Allele frequency and frequency difference of each SNP were calculated with VCFtools (versions 4.0) – freq and –diff-site (Danecek et al., 2011). In each of the lines, loci with genotypic information was retained from more than four individuals. The difference of allele frequency among two populations was subjected to chi-squared testing.

Results

Sequencing and Mapping Summary

On average, ∼1,14,000 (80%) clean reads were obtained from ∼1,42,000 raw reads for each individual. Eighty-eight percentage of reads were aligned to the chicken genome assembly (galGal6) (Table 2), and the captured specificity reached 99%. The coverage of target regions ranged from 70 to 84%, with an average of 80%. However, the target region coverage of the line 63 and line 72 was the lowest, about 70% (Figure 1). The average depth of the 92 kb target regions reached over 240×, among them, the coverage of 55 kb was more than 30×, and the coverage of 64 kb was more than 10×.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Summary statistics of a targeted sequencing and mapping region of chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. SNP and INDEL density in each population. The variation density means that the count of SNPs per kb and the count of INDELs per 10 kb.

The SNP database at Ensembl (release 102) had 4,804 known variations in this region, including 4,572 SNPs and 232 INDELs. In this study, a total of 3,319 SNPs and 181 INDELs were identified in the 21 populations (Table 3). Among them, there were 1,262 known SNPs (38%) and 22 known INDELs (12%); and the rest 2,057 SNPs (62%) and 159 INDELs (88%) were discovered for the first time. The Chinese domestic populations GS, NY, XB, and XY had the most abundant SNPs and INDELs than others, and the highly inbred line 63 and 72 showed the fewest SNPs and INDELs among the populations. There were no breed-specific SNPs or INDELs identified in this study, and most of them were mutually shared between some populations. We also calculated the allele frequency to analyze the difference in the BF/BL region between the MD resistant line 63 and the MD-susceptible line 72. There were only 12 loci with allele frequency differences greater than 0.3, and the largest difference was 0.5, seven of them differed at significant levels (P < 0.05, chi-squared testing). There was no SNP locus that completely separates the two lines (Table 4).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. SNPs and INDELs detected in 21 chicken populations.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Allele frequency differences between the line 63 and line 72.

Since the coverage of the different populations was different, we calculated variation density as follows: the numbers of SNPs and INDELs were divided by the coverage of each population. The population diversity was assessed as the number of SNP per kb and the number of INDEL per 10 kb. The top five populations with the highest density of SNPs were NY, XB, GS, XY, and WD, with 20.87, 20.29, 20.26, 19.28, and 18.57 per kb, respectively. The lowest density of SNP was found in RJF, inbred line 63 and line 72, with 2.13, 2.35, and 8.16, respectively. Similarly, NY, GS, XB, XY, and WC five populations showed the highest density of INDELs, and the three populations with the lowest density of INDELs were RJF, the line 63, and line 72. The SNP and INDEL densities in the two introduced populations, CS and WL, were lower than those of most of the Chinese indigenous populations (Figure 1).

Characteristic and Distribution of SNPs in Genes

The whole BF/BL region showed a very high genetic diversity, with an average of about 36 SNPs per kb. Among a total of 18 genes, the most diverse genes were BF2 and TAP2, with more than 50 SNPs per kb. About 86% of the SNPs identified in BF2 were newly discovered. The coding region variation was primarily concentrated in the second and third exon of BF2. BF1 and C4 followed with more than 40 SNPs per kb. CENPA, BLEC2, and two BLB genes had the lowest SNP rates of about 20 SNPs per kb (Figure 2). Among the 21 populations, RJF, line 63 and line 72 had the lowest diversity, while NY, GS, and XG were observed with the highest diversity in both BF genes (Figure 3). The diversity of CS and WL were lower than most of the Chinese domestic breeds. In addition, we also counted the number of variants in other genes (Supplementary Table 2). We then annotated all detected SNPs using VEP and found that most SNPs (54%) were located on the intron, 21% in coding region, about 7 and 4% in the downstream and upstream flanking regions, respectively, 3% in splice region and 5% were situated at UTR regions (Figure 4A). In the coding region, more than half of the SNP were missense variants; 43% were synonymous variants (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The number of SNPs per kb in 18 genes. The SNP rates from low to high follow the clockwise direction.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The number of SNPs in BF1 and BF2 among different chicken populations.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. SNPs in functional regions. (A) SNPs in functional regions. (B) SNPs in coding sequences. upstream: 500 bp apart from the transcription start site; downstream: 500 bp apart from the transcription end site.

Characteristic and Distribution of INDELs in Genes

The ratio of deletion (64%) was significantly higher than that of insertion (36%). Both the largest deletion and insertion detected in this study were 60 and 25 bp, respectively, and both the smallest deletion and insertion were 1 bp. A large proportion (89%) of INDELs were less than 10 bp. The majority was the single base-pair INDEL and accounted for 58% of all detected INDELs. In addition, INDELs were spread out of a 826 bp segment, accounting for 1% of the target region, and the region affected by deletions was larger than that by insertions (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Distribution of INDEL length. INDELs with multiple alleles were not included.

To explore the distribution of INDELs across the 18 genes in the BF/BL region, insertion and deletion of different genes were counted, and the INDEL rate was calculated as the number of INDEL per kb for each gene. We observed that the average of INDEL rate on the target region was 2 per kb. The BLEC2 and TAP2 showed the lowest INDEL rate. The two genes, BF1 and BF2, coding the components of MHC class I molecules, showed the highest INDEL rate. Both showed more than 5 INDELs per kb. Our data showed that the BF1 and BF2 did not have large insertions and deletions, and the length of the INDELs in these genes was within 15 bp (Table 5). In order to have a deeper insight on the distribution of INDELs in the gene regions, we annotated all the detected INDELs using VEP. We found that 62% INDELs were located on introns, 14% in coding exon, 15% in downstream and upstream flanking region, 5% in the UTR regions, and 2% in splice region (Figure 6A). In the coding region, more than three-quarters of the identified variants were frameshift variant, 8% were inframe deletion variant, 7% were inframe insertion variant, and the remaining 3% were protein altering variant (Figure 6B).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Distribution of INDELs across 18 genes.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. INDELs in functional regions. (A) INDELs in functional regions. (B) INDELs in coding sequences. upstream: 500 bp apart from the transcription start site; downstream: 500 bp apart from the transcription end site.

Discussion

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used for identification of genome-wide genetic variation (Davey et al., 2011; Nielsen et al., 2011). However, chromosome 16 has not been elucidated well by NGS analysis because the sequencing coverage of chr16 was relatively poor (only about 50%), much lower than that of the other chromosomes (Yan et al., 2014). Additionally, NGS is not economically suitable for large-scale samples due to the high cost, therefore many cost-efficient methods have been developed to analyze subsets of genome-scale data, such as target enrichment sequencing of specific genes, which can significantly reduce the costs (Dapprich et al., 2016). WaferGen, a target region sequencing platform, is a PCR based platform that can generate as many as 5,184 amplification reactions on one chip (De Wilde et al., 2014). In this study, we conducted target enrichment sequencing to evaluate the polymorphism in the BF/BL region of 21 diverse chicken populations. Our capture efficiency was 99%, which was higher than a previous study in turkey (capture efficiency 53%) using a custom MHC SureSelect capture array (Reed et al., 2016). The average depth of our data in the target region reached about 200×, and the coverage of target region with more than 30× were 55 kb on average. The mean depth of the target region in this study was three times deeper than similar reported research in human (Jones and Good, 2016), which indicated high accuracy and reliability of the variations identified in this study.

A total of 3,500 variations were detected in the BF/BL region of the 21 chicken populations in this study. Among them, 2,057 SNPs and 159 INDELs were novel, which drastically expand the current Ensembl SNP database. The number of novel INDELs detected in this study was quite large, accounted for 5% of the total variations, but most of them privately appeared in some populations, which suggested that using additional populations with large genetic background differences may detect more genetic variation of the genome. We identified an average of 36 SNPs and 2 INDELs per kb in the BF/BL region, which is higher than that reported by Brandstrom and Ellegren (2007). International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium reported an average mutation density of 5 SNP/kb in the chicken genome (Wong et al., 2004), and that is much lower than what we found in the region, which also indicated high polymorphism of MHC BF/BL region. More than one-third of the variations have a minimum allele frequency above 0.05 in the populations, which meets the requirements of molecular markers for genetic analysis and may be implemented in breeding programs for genetic improvement (Mills et al., 2006, 2011; Vali et al., 2008; Maw et al., 2013).

Among these 18 genes, BF gene, and TAP gene showed high diversity, which is consistent with their antigen presenting roles. The BF genes encode typical MHC class I glycoproteins. The exon 2 and exon 3 of BF genes encoding α1 and α2 domains of MHC-I are related to the resistance of many avian diseases (Hunt and Fulton, 1998; Kaufman et al., 1999; Rogers et al., 2003). TAP molecules are a part of the MHC class I antigen-processing pathway (Pamer and Cresswell, 1998). TAP heterodimer formed by TAP1 and TAP2 transports the antigen peptides into endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Deverson et al., 1990; Trowsdale et al., 1990; Spies et al., 2008). In human, one TAP heterodimer, four tapasin molecules, and four class I-β2m molecules form a peptide-loading complex that assists efficient loading of peptide onto class I molecules (Ortmann et al., 1997). Once the peptide in the lumen of the ER associates with class I molecules, the complex of MHC class I, β2m and the peptide will move to the cell surface, and the peptide will be presented to CD8 + T cells (Pamer and Cresswell, 1998). As key components of the MHC-I antigen presenting pathway, super high polymorphism of BF gene and TAP gene potentially contribute to highly effective antigen presentation and broad-spectrum host resistance to pathogens. Therefore, the high diversity that we found in most of the Chinese local populations implies that they potentially possess a broad-spectrum of disease resistance capability.

Among the domestic populations, NY chicken, GS chicken, XG fowl, and XY chicken were found with the highest polymorphism. These breeds were not yet subjected too strong artificial selection. NY chicken, a local breed in Guangxi province of China, showed the most abundant diversity, but the information about this chicken is limited. Guangxi local poultry resource book described that it was once a pheasant population in Guangxi, China. The habitat of the NY chicken was primarily in the forests, and it was domesticated after capture by the natives. Previous research suggested that RJFs showed extraordinarily high diversity (Hoa et al., 2016), but it was observed with fewer variations in our study. These might result from that only three RJFs were used in this study. High polymorphism of Chinese domestic chickens was also observed by Qu et al. (2006). They found the average heterozygosity of 78 Chinese indigenous chicken breeds was 0.622 by analyzing 27 microsatellite markers. The diversity of WL and CS in our research is lower than that of most Chinese domestic chicken populations, which might be resulted from historical selection for performance characteristics. Izadi et al. (2011) reported that intensively selected commercial populations seem to have low genetic variability in the MHC regions compared with that of the non-commercial flocks, which are less intensively selected. Manjula et al. (2020) reported that compared with commercial breeds, Korea native breeds had high genetic diversity in the MHC-B region, and they showed immune capabilities and genetic potential for resistance to many different pathogens. Hillel et al. (2003) used 22 microsatellite markers to analyze the polymorphisms of 52 chicken breeds from different countries and found that the average heterozygosity of local breeds was 0.50, but that of the commercial chicken breeds was only 0.29, which indicated that long-term intensity selection reduces population diversity. In this study, we found the polymorphisms of line 63 and line 72 were among the lowest, which must be resulted from high-pressure selection and is in good agreement with the other studies (Waters, 1945; Stone, 1975; Bacon et al., 2000).

Conclusion

We identified abundant genetic variations in the chicken MHC-B-F/B-L region, which not only strikingly expanded the current Ensembl SNP database, but also provided comprehensive data for researchers to further investigate association between variants in MHC and immune traits. The Chinese domestic breeds showed high diversity, which suggest their broad-spectrum resistance to pathogens. Long-term intensity selection significantly reduced diversity of MHC B-F/B-L region of the highly inbred line 63 and 72 chickens.

Data Availability Statement

All raw sequence data had been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Achieve (SRA) under the Bioproject number PRJNA728310. The experiment numbers for the 195 chickens are SAMN19075170–SAMN19075364.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experiment of China Agricultural University. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author Contributions

YY performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. HZ supported the samples and provided comments on the manuscript. GY provided comments on the data analysis and revised the manuscript. KW provided comments on the data analysis. ZY, CZ, HY, and JL prepared and detected the samples. NY supported the samples and provided comments on the experiment. LL conceived and designed the experiment, provided comments on the data analysis, manuscript writing, and revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1901206 and 31301957), the Young Scientist Supporting Project, Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_15R62), the National Germplasm Center of Domestic Animal Resources, China Agriculture Research Systems (CARS-40), and the Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoxiang Hu for providing DNA of Red Jungle Fowl.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.710770/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Table 1 | Primer design for chicken MHC BF/BL region using WaferGen Smartchip Platform.

Supplementary Table 2 | The number of SNPs and INDELs in 18 genes.

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

Bacon, L. D. (1987). Influence of the major histocompatibility complex on disease resistance and productivity. Poult. Sci. 66, 802–811. doi: 10.3382/ps.0660802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bacon, L. D., Hunt, H. D., and Cheng, H. H. (2000). A review of the development of chicken lines to resolve genes determining resistance to diseases. Poult. Sci. 79, 1082–1093. doi: 10.1093/ps/79.8.1082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brandstrom, M., and Ellegren, H. (2007). The genomic landscape of short insertion and deletion polymorphisms in the chicken (Gallus gallus) genome: a high frequency of deletions in tandem duplicates. Genetics 176, 1691–1701. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.070805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, C. S., Chen, C. F., Berthouly-Salazar, C., Chazara, O., Lee, Y. P., Chang, C. M., et al. (2012). A global analysis of molecular markers and phenotypic traits in local chicken breeds in Taiwan. Anim. Genet. 43, 172–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02226.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C. A., Banks, E., DePristo, M. A., et al. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dapprich, J., Ferriola, D., Mackiewicz, K., Clark, P. M., Rappaport, E., D’Arcy, M., et al. (2016). The next generation of target capture technologies – large DNA fragment enrichment and sequencing determines regional genomic variation of high complexity. BMC Genomics 17:486. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2836-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davey, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Etter, P. D., Boone, J. Q., Catchen, J. M., and Blaxter, M. L. (2011). Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 499–510. doi: 10.1038/nrg3012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Wilde, B., Lefever, S., Dong, W., Dunne, J., Husain, S., Derveaux, S., et al. (2014). Target enrichment using parallel nanoliter quantitative PCR amplification. BMC Genomics 15:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deverson, E. V., Gow, I. R., Coadwell, W. J., Monaco, J. J., Butcher, G. W., and Howard, J. C. (1990). Mhc Class-Ii region encoding proteins related to the multidrug resistance family of transmembrane transporters. Nature 348, 738–741. doi: 10.1038/348738a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Esmailnejad, A., Brujeni, G. N., and Badavam, M. (2017). LEI0258 microsatellite variability and its association with humoral and cell mediated immune responses in broiler chickens. Mol. Immunol. 90, 22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.06.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ewald, S. J., and Livant, E. J. (2004). Distinctive polymorphism of chicken B-FI (major histocompatibility complex class I) molecules. Poult. Sci. 83, 600–605. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.4.600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fulton, J. E., Juul-Madsen, H. R., Ashwell, C. M., McCarron, A. M., Arthur, J. A., O’Sullivan, N. P., et al. (2006). Molecular genotype identification of the Gallus gallus major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 58, 407–421. doi: 10.1007/s00251-006-0119-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guillemot, F., Billault, A., Pourquie, O., Behar, G., Chausse, A. M., Zoorob, R., et al. (1988). A molecular map of the chicken major histocompatibility complex – the Class-Ii beta-genes are closely linked to the class-i genes and the nucleolar organizer. EMBO J. 7, 2775–2785. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03132.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, B., Lian, L., Qu, L. J., Zheng, J. X., and Yang, N. (2013). Abundant polymorphisms at the microsatellite locus LEI0258 in indigenous chickens. Poult. Sci. 92, 3113–3119. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hillel, J., Groenen, M. A. M., Tixier-Boichard, M., Korol, A. B., David, L., Kirzhner, V. M., et al. (2003). Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35, 533–557. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoa, N. P., Fulton, J. E., and Berres, M. E. (2016). Genetic variation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in wild red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus). Poult. Sci. 95, 400–411. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X., Li, L., Zhang, J., He, D., Zhang, X., Chen, J., et al. (2016). Evaluation of diversity and evolution of the microsatellite LEI0258 in chicken MHC-B region from South China. Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 47, 2175–2183.

Google Scholar

Hunt, H. D., and Fulton, J. E. (1998). Analysis of polymorphisms in the major expressed class I locus (B-FIV) of the chicken. Immunogenetics 47, 456–467. doi: 10.1007/s002510050383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Izadi, F., Ritland, C., and Cheng, K. M. (2011). Genetic diversity of the major histocompatibility complex region in commercial and noncommercial chicken flocks using the LEI0258 microsatellite marker. Poult. Sci. 90, 2711–2717. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, M. R., and Good, J. M. (2016). Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics. Mol. Ecol. 25, 185–202. doi: 10.1111/mec.13304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. (2018). Generalists and specialists: a new view of how MHC Class I molecules fight infectious pathogens. Trends Immunol. 39, 367–379. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaufman, J., Milne, S., Gobel, T. W. F., Walker, B. A., Jacob, J. P., Auffray, C., et al. (1999). The chicken B locus is a minimal essential major histocompatibility complex. Nature 401, 923–925. doi: 10.1038/44856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaufman, J., Volk, H., and Wallny, H. J. (1995). A “minimal essential Mhc” and an “unrecognized Mhc”: two extremes in selection for polymorphism. Immunol. Rev. 143, 63–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1995.tb00670.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamont, S. J. (1989). The chicken major histocompatibility complex in disease resistance and poultry breeding. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 1328–1333. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79240-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamont, S. J., Hou, Y. H., Young, B. M., and Nordskog, A. W. (1987). Research note: differences in major histocompatibility complex gene frequencies associated with feed efficiency and laying performance. Poult. Sci. 66, 1064–1066. doi: 10.3382/ps.0661064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., and Durbin, R. (2010). Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., et al. (2009). The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manjula, P., Bed’Hom, B., Hoque, M. R., Cho, S., Seo, D., Chazara, O., et al. (2020). Genetic diversity of MHC-B in 12 chicken populations in Korea revealed by single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Immunogenetics 72, 367–379. doi: 10.1007/s00251-020-01176-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manjula, P., Kim, M., Cho, S., Seo, D., and Lee, J. H. (2021). High levels of genetic variation in MHC-linked microsatellite markers from native chicken breeds. Genes 12:240. doi: 10.3390/genes12020240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maw, A. A., Shimogiri, T., Yamamoto, K., Kawabe, K., Hamada, K., Kawamoto, Y., et al. (2013). The genetic diversity of eight chicken populations assessed by 102 indels markers. J. Poult. Sci. 50, 99–103. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0120088

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McConnell, S. K., Dawson, D. A., Wardle, A., and Burke, T. (1999). The isolation and mapping of 19 tetranucleotide microsatellite markers in the chicken. Anim. Genet. 30, 183–189. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00454.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., et al. (2010). The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, M. M., Bacon, L. D., Hala, K., Hunt, H. D., Ewald, S. J., Kaufman, J., et al. (2004). 2004 Nomenclature for the chicken major histocompatibility (B and Y) complex. Immunogenetics 56, 261–279. doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0682-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, M. M., and Taylor, R. L. (2016). Brief review of the chicken major histocompatibility complex: the genes, their distribution on chromosome 16, and their contributions to disease resistance. Poult. Sci. 95, 375–392. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mills, R. E., Luttig, C. T., Larkins, C. E., Beauchamp, A., Tsui, C., Pittard, W. S., et al. (2006). An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 1182–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.4565806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mills, R. E., Pittard, W. S., Mullaney, J. M., Farooq, U., Creasy, T. H., Mahurkar, A. A., et al. (2011). Natural genetic variation caused by small insertions and deletions in the human genome. Genome Res. 21, 830–839. doi: 10.1101/gr.115907.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nielsen, R., Paul, J. S., Albrechtsen, A., and Song, Y. S. (2011). Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 443–451. doi: 10.1038/nrg2986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortmann, B., Copeman, J., Lehner, P. J., Sadasivan, B., Herberg, J. A., Grandea, A. G., et al. (1997). A critical role for tapasin in the assembly and function of multimeric MHC class I-TAP complexes. Science 277, 1306–1309. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pamer, E., and Cresswell, P. (1998). Mechanisms of MHC class I - Restricted antigen processing. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16, 323–358. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pazderka, F., Longenecker, B. M., Law, G. R. J., and Ruth, R. F. (1975). The major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. Immunogenetics 2, 101–130. doi: 10.1007/BF01572280

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plachy, J., Pink, J. R., and Hala, K. (1992). Biology of the chicken MHC (B complex). Crit. Rev. Immunol. 12, 47–79.

Google Scholar

Qu, L. J., Li, X. Y., Xu, G. F., Chen, K. W., Yang, H. J., Zhang, L. C., et al. (2006). Evaluation of genetic diversity in Chinese indigenous chicken breeds using microsatellite markers. Sci. China Ser. C-Life Sci. 49, 332–341. doi: 10.1007/s11427-006-2001-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reed, K. M., Mendoza, K. M., and Settlage, R. E. (2016). Targeted capture enrichment and sequencing identifies extensive nucleotide variation in the turkey MHC-B. Immunogenetics 68, 219–229. doi: 10.1007/s00251-015-0893-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, S., Shaw, I., Ross, N., Nair, V., Rothwell, L., Kaufman, J., et al. (2003). Analysis of part of the chicken Rfp-Y region reveals two novel lectin genes, the first complete genomic sequence of a class I alpha-chain gene, a truncated class II beta-chain gene, and a large CR1 repeat. Immunogenetics 55, 100–108. doi: 10.1007/s00251-003-0553-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shiina, T., Briles, W. E., Goto, R. M., Hosomichi, K., Yanagiya, K., Shimizu, S., et al. (2007). Extended gene map reveals tripartite motif, C-type lectin, and Ig superfamily type genes within a subregion of the chicken MHC-B affecting infectious disease. J. Immunol. 178, 7162–7172. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spies, T., Bresnahan, M., Bahram, S., Arnold, D., Blanck, G., Mellins, E., et al. (2008). A gene in the human major histocompatibility complex class II region controlling the class I antigen presentation pathway (Reprinted from Nature, vol 348, pg 744-747, 1990). J. Immunol. 180, 2737–2740.

Google Scholar

Stone, H. A. (1975). Use of Highly Inbred Chickens in Research. USDA Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin No. 1514. Washington, DC: USDA.

Google Scholar

Trowsdale, J., Hanson, I., Mockridge, I., Beck, S., Townsend, A., and Kelly, A. (1990). Sequences encoded in the Class-Ii Region of the Mhc Related to the Abc superfamily of transporters. Nature 348, 741–744. doi: 10.1038/348741a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vali, U., Brandstrom, M., Johansson, M., and Ellegren, H. (2008). Insertion-deletion polymorphisms (indels) as genetic markers in natural populations. BMC Genet. 9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, N. F. (1945). Breeding for resistance and susceptibility to avian lymphomatosis. Poult. Sci. 24, 259–269. doi: 10.3382/ps.0240259

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong, G. K. S., Liu, B., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, Z. J., et al. (2004). A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432, 717–722. doi: 10.1038/nature03156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Y. Y., Yi, G. Q., Sun, C. J., Qu, L. J., and Yang, N. (2014). Genome-wide characterization of insertion and deletion variation in chicken using next generation sequencing. PLoS One 9:e104652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuhki, N., and Obrien, S. J. (1990). DNA variation of the mammalian major histocompatibility complex reflects genomic diversity and population history. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 836–840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zekarias, B., Ter Huurne, A. A. H. M., Landman, W. J. M., Rebel, J. M. J., Pol, J. M. A., and Gruys, E. (2002). Immunological basis of differences in disease resistance in the chicken. Vet. Res. 33, 109–125. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2002001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chicken, MHC, target enrichment sequencing, B-F/B-L region, genetic diversity

Citation: Yuan Y, Zhang H, Yi G, You Z, Zhao C, Yuan H, Wang K, Li J, Yang N and Lian L (2021) Genetic Diversity of MHC B-F/B-L Region in 21 Chicken Populations. Front. Genet. 12:710770. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.710770

Received: 17 May 2021; Accepted: 26 July 2021;
Published: 13 August 2021.

Edited by:

Sankar Subramanian, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia

Reviewed by:

Long Zhang, China West Normal University, China
Shi-Yi Chen, Sichuan Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2021 Yuan, Zhang, Yi, You, Zhao, Yuan, Wang, Li, Yang and Lian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ling Lian, lianlinglara@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.