Abstract
Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK, OMIM 144200) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease, clinically characterized by diffuse yellowish thickening of the skin on the palms and soles, usually with erythematous borders developing during the first weeks or months after birth. Pathogenesis of EPPK is determined by mutations in the keratin gene (KRT9). Thirty three mutations in the KRT9 gene from 100 EPPK families have been identified. Among these, 23 mutations are located in the 1A region (a mutation hot spot region), 7 are located in the 2B region, and the remaining 3 are synonymous mutations. In this study, three heterozygous mutations (p.N161S, p.R163W, and p.R163Q), located in regions of the gene encoding the conserved central a-helix rod domain, were detected in the KRT9 gene of the three large Chinese families. This study confirms that codon 163 (48 of 100 cases) is a hot spot mutation site for KRT9. Additional findings identified p.N161S (4%) and p.R163W (4%) as potential hot spot mutations for EPPK associated with knuckle pads, and p.R163Q (15 of 100 cases) as the hot spot mutation of EPPK not occurring in combination with knuckle pads. In conjunction with future studies, this research may help lay the foundation for genetics counseling, prenatal diagnosis and clinical treatment of EPPK.
Background
Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK, OMIM 144200), also known as Vorner's palmoplantar keratosis, is an autosomal dominant inherited disease characterized by diffuse, yellow thickening of the palm and sole with an erythematous margin. It was first described in 1901 by Vorner. The incidence rate is approximately 2.2 to 4.4 per 100 000 live newborns (Bonifas et al., 1994; Covello et al., 1998; Smith, 2003; Lopez-Valdez et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014). Some patients may have hyperhidrosis, knuckle pads, camptodactyly and digital mutilation (Lu et al., 2003; Du et al., 2011; Umegaki et al., 2011). Female patients may have an increased risk for ovarian cancer or breast cancer (Hamada et al., 2013).
Keratin 9 is composed of the functional head domain, the functional α-helical domain and the functional tail domain, and is expressed only in the suprabasal layers of the palmoplantar epidermis (Uitto et al., 2007). To date, domestic and foreign scholars have found 33 KRT9 gene mutations in 100 EPPK families, of which 15 cases are associated with knuckle pads. There is no report making a detailed summary and analysis. In this study, cases of EPPK were analyzed to look for genotype-phenotype correlations by searching the database and consulting the literatures, providing a theoretical basis for the prenatal diagnosis of, genetic counseling for, and clinical treatment of EPPK.
Compliance With Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed written consents were obtained from all individual participants or their legal representatives (parents) included in the study. The study was approved without restrictions by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The probands and their family members provided written informed consent for the publication of this case report.
Case Presentation
Three unrelated Chinese EPPK pedigrees from Shandong and Anhui Province were investigated. All patients exhibited typical EPPK features. There were no close relatives bettwen these families. Family 1 was a six generational EPPK pedigree with 17 affected members, including 11 males and 6 females. The minimum age of onset is 1 year of age. The proband was a 42-year-old man who presented with diffuse thickening and hyperkeratosis on palms with the nails being normal, and combined knuckle pads, hyperhidrosis and camptodactyly (Figures 1A, 2A). There is no evidence that the proband was associated with other diseases. Family 2 was a 4 generational EPPK pedigree with 11 affected members, and the 20-year-old female proband presented with diffuse thickening and hyperkeratosis on palms and soles (Figures 1B, 2B). Family 3 was a 5 generational EPPK pedigree with 10 affected members, and the proband was a 42-year-old man who demonstrated hyperkeratosis of both palmar and plantar skin within 1 year of birth (Figures 1C, 2C).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Laboratory Investigations
Genetic Testing and Confirmation of Mutation
Peripheral blood samples were collected from members of the three families and 100 healthy unrelated Chinese individuals. Genomic DNA was extracted using a Flexi Gene DNA Kit (250). The primers were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR products were directly sequenced by an ABI3730 DNA Sequencer (ABI, USA). The sequence was analyzed by Chromas 2.0 software.
Identification of Three Distinct Mutations in the KRT9 Gene of Three Large Chinese Families
Patients of family 1 had a heterozygous mutation c.482A>G (P.Asn161His) in KRT9 gene (Figure 3A). Patients of family 2 had a heterozygous mutation c.487C>T (p.Arg163Trp) in KRT9 gene (Figure 3B). Patients of family 3 had a heterozygous mutation c.488G>A (p.Arg163Gln) in KRT9 gene (Figure 3C).These mutations were not found in normal members of three families and in 100 healthy controls.
Figure 3
Genetic Characteristics of the Mutation in the KRT9 Gene
This study searched the human intermediate filament database (http://www.interfil.org/index.php), PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), China National Knowledge Internet (http://www.cnki.net/), and a large portion of literature and found that 33 KRT9 gene mutations were reported in 100 EPPK families by domestic and foreign scholars (Table 1). Disease causing mutations are as follows: of which 23 are located in the 1A region (hot spot mutation region), 7 in the 2B region, and the remaining 3 are synonymous mutations. Missense mutations at amino acid 163 (48% of all mutations) is indeed a hot spot mutation site for KRT9. We also found that the mutations of EPPK associated with knuckle pads (15% of 100 cases) are p.N161S (4%), p.R163W (4%), p.L168S (3%), p.M157T (1%), p.L160F (1%), p.C406R (1%), and p.L458p (1%). Since these mutations are the most prevalent we can suggest that p.N161S and p.R163W are potential hot spot mutations of EPPK associated with knuckle pads. The hot spot mutation of EPPK not associated with knuckle pads is p.R163Q (15 of 100 cases).
Table 1
| No | Nucleotide change | Amino acid changes | Domain | Clinical symptoms | Number of reported cases | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | c.31T>G; 31_516del | p.Leu11Val; Leu11_Gln172 del | head, 1A | EPPK | 1 | Fuchs-Telem et al., 2013 |
| 2 | c.469A>G | p.Met157Val | 1A | EPPK | 2 | Hennies et al., 1994 |
| 2 | Covello et al., 1998 | |||||
| 1 | Rugg et al., 2002 | |||||
| 3 | c.470T>C | p.Met157Thr | 1A | EPPK without knuckle pads | 1 | Covello et al., 1998 |
| 1 | Shimomura et al., 2010 | |||||
| EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Chen et al., 2009 | ||||
| 4 | c.470T>G | p.Met157Arg | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Shimazu et al., 2006 |
| 1 | Zhao et al., 2008 | |||||
| 1 | Liang et al., 2014 | |||||
| 5 | c.470T>A | p.Met157Lys | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Shimomura et al., 2010 |
| 6 | c.478C>G | p.Leu160Val | 1A | EPPK | 1 | (Endo and Hatamochi, 1997) |
| 7 | c.478C>T | p.Leu160Phe | 1A | EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Lu et al., 2003 |
| 8 | c.481A>T | p.Asn161Tyr | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Torchard et al., 1994 |
| 9 | c.481A>C | p.Asn161His | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Lee et al., 2003 |
| 1 | Lin et al., 2004 | |||||
| 10 | c.482A>G | p.Asn161Ser | 1A | EPPK without knuckle pads | 1 | Bonifas et al., 1994 |
| 1 | Amichai et al., 2002 | |||||
| 1 | Lee et al., 2003 | |||||
| 1 | Liu et al., 2014 | |||||
| 1 | Mao et al., 2018 | |||||
| EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Tsunemi et al., 2002 | ||||
| 1 | Zhang et al., 2004 | |||||
| 1 | Hamada et al., 2005 | |||||
| 1 | Yin et al., 2007 | |||||
| 11 | c.482A>T | p.Asn161Ile | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Kuster et al., 2002 |
| 1 | Csikós et al., 2003 | |||||
| 12 | c.483T>A | p.Asn161Lys | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Reis et al., 1994 |
| 13 | c.484C>T | p.Pro162Ser | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Li et al., 2008 |
| 14 | c.484T>C | p.Ser162Pro | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Zeng et al., 2017 |
| 15 | c.487C>T | p.Arg163Trp | 1A | EPPK without knuckle pads | 3 | Reis et al., 1994 |
| 1 | Bonifas et al., 1994 | |||||
| 2 | Navsaria et al., 1995 | |||||
| 1 | Rothnagel et al., 1995 | |||||
| 1 | Yang et al., 1998 | |||||
| 1 | Mayuzumi et al., 1999 | |||||
| 1 | Morgan et al., 1999 | |||||
| 1 | Warmuth et al., 2000 | |||||
| 1 | Rugg et al., 2002 | |||||
| 1 | Yang et al., 2003 | |||||
| 3 | Lee et al., 2003 | |||||
| 3 | Terrinoni et al., 2004 | |||||
| 1 | Funakushi et al., 2009 | |||||
| 1 | Umegaki et al., 2011 | |||||
| 2 | Liu et al., 2012 | |||||
| 1 | Guo et al., 2014 | |||||
| 2 | Ke et al., 2014 | |||||
| 1 | Wang et al., 2016 | |||||
| EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Mao et al., 2018 | ||||
| 1 | Chiu et al., 2007 | |||||
| 1 | Codispoti et al., 2009 | |||||
| 1 | Lopez-Valdez et al., 2013 | |||||
| 16 | c.488G>A | p.Arg163Gln | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Reis et al., 1994 |
| 1 | Kobayashi et al., 1996 | |||||
| 1 | Yang et al., 1998 | |||||
| 1 | Covello et al., 1998 | |||||
| 1 | Szalai et al., 1999 | |||||
| 1 | Rugg et al., 2002 | |||||
| 1 | Wennerstrand et al., 2003 | |||||
| 1 | Yang et al., 2003 | |||||
| 1 | Sun et al., 2005 | |||||
| 2 | Shimomura et al., 2010 | |||||
| 1 | Li et al., 2012 | |||||
| 1 | Ke et al., 2014 | |||||
| 1 | Zhang et al., 2016 | |||||
| 1 | Mao et al., 2018 | |||||
| 17 | c.488G>C | p.Arg163Pro | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Kon et al., 2006 |
| 18 | c.491T>C | p.Leu164Pro | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Mao et al., 2018 |
| 19 | c.500_500delAinsGGCT | p.Tyr167delinsTrpLeu | 1A | EPPK | 1 | He et al., 2004 |
| 3 | Zhang et al., 2005 | |||||
| 20 | c.503T>C | p.Leu168Ser | 1A | EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Rothnagel et al., 1995 |
| 1 | Yin et al., 2007 | |||||
| 1 | Li et al., 2009 | |||||
| 21 | c.508A>T | p.Lys170X | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Szalai et al., 1999 |
| 22 | c.511G>A | p.Val171Met | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Rugg et al., 2002 |
| 23 | c.515A>C | p.Gln172Pro | 1A | EPPK | 1 | Hennies et al., 1994 |
| 24 | c.1216T>C | p.Cys406Arg | 2B | EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Wang et al., 2010 |
| 25 | c.1282C>T | p.Gln428X | 2B | EPPK | 1 | Umegaki et al., 2011 |
| 26 | c.1360T>C | p.Tyr454His | 2B | EPPK | 1 | Shimomura et al., 2010 |
| 27 | c.1362_1363insCAC | p.Tyr454_His 455insHis | 2B | EPPK | 1 | Coleman et al., 1999 |
| 28 | c.1369C>T | p. Leu457Phe | 2B | EPPK | 1 | Xiao et al., 2018 |
| 29 | c.1372C>T | p.Leu458Phe | 2B | EPPK | 1 | Kon et al., 2006 |
| 30 | c.1373 T >C | p.L458P | 2B | EPPK with knuckle pads | 1 | Du et al., 2011 |
Mutations analysis in KRT9 gene of EPPK.
3 synonymous mutations are not listed.
Discussion
Epidermolytic palmar hyperkeratosis (EPPK) is rare in clinical settings with a prevalence of ~4.4/100,000. In mild cases, only the epidermis of the palmoplantar is rough, and severe horny thickening plaques appear in the palmoplantar region. It may even spread to the lateral edge of the palmoplantar skin or the hands and feet and may be accompanied by knuckle pads and finger-toe flexion deformities. The keratin mutations that have been found so far are concentrated in the 1A helix region and the 2B helix region, namely, the KRT9 gene mutation hot spot (Guo et al., 2014; Liang et al., 2014), especially the 1A region, which affects the formation of keratinous network structures leading to severe clinical manifestations.
Researchers at home and abroad have found that the 163rd amino acid is the hotspot mutation region of the KRT9 gene (48 of 100 cases) (Rugg et al., 2002). EPPK combined with knuckle pads maybe associated with mutations in many KRT9 genes, such as p.Met157Thr, p.Leu160Phe, p.Asn161Ser,p.Arg163Trp, p.Leu168Ser, p.Cys406Arg, and p.Leu458Pro (Escobar et al., 2007; Codispoti et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010; Du et al., 2011; Mao et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2018). In this study, we studied three large Chinese families with EPPK and found 3 heterozygous gene mutations of KRT9: c.482A>G (p.Asn161Ser), c.487C>T (p.Arg163Trp) and c.488G>A (p.Arg163Gln).These mutations were not found in normal members of three families and in 100 healthy controls, indicating that the mutations detected in the families were the pathogenic mutations. The mutation p.Asn161Ser has been reported several times in relation to the typical hyperkeratotic manifestations of palmoplantar skin in patients with EPPK, but it has not been associated with other clinical phenotypes. In 2005, Japanese scholars reported a case of EPPK in a 13-year-old patient with knuckle pads, and the genetic test results were found to be associated with the mutation p.Asn161Ser. In this study, the pathogenic mutation of family 1 was p.Asn161Ser, and all patients in the family showed knuckle pads, consistent with previous reports. This study found that 33 KRT9 gene mutations in 100 EPPK families have been reported by domestic and foreign scholars, and the mutations of EPPK associated with knuckle pads (15 of 100 cases) are p.N161S (4%), p.R163W (4%), p.L168S (3%), p.M157T (1%), p.L160F (1%), p.C406R (1%), and p.L458p (1%), suggesting p.N161S and p.R163W are potential hot spot mutations of EPPK associated with knuckle pads, and p.R163Q (15 of 100 cases) as the hot spot mutation of EPPK not occurring in combination with knuckle pads.Based on the above studies, this case reveals knuckle pads may also be one of the less common clinical phenotypes of EPPK, and we think this study should help lay the foundation for genetics counseling, prenatal diagnosis and clinic treatment of EPPK.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the individuals and their families who participated in this project. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AmichaiB.KarpatiM.GoldmanB. L. P. (2002). Keratin-9 gene mutation in a family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.16, 134–136. 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2002.00426.x
2
BonifasJ. M.MatsumuraK.ChenM. A.Berth-JonesJ.HutchisonP. E.ZloczowerM.et al. (1994). Mutations of keratin 9 in two families with palmoplantar epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J. Invest. Dermatol.103, 474–477. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12395570
3
ChenX. L.XuC. M.CaiS. R.ChenC. Y.ZhangX. N. (2009). Prenatal diagnosis of epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma caused by c.T470C (p.M157T) of the keratin 9 gene in a Chinese kindred. Prenat. Diagn.29, 911–913. 10.1002/pd.2315
4
ChiuH. C.JeeS. H.SheenY. S.ChuC. Y.LinP. J.LiawS. H. (2007). Mutation of keratin 9 (R163W) in a family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma and knuckle pads. J. Dermatol. Sci.45, 63–65. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2006.09.005
5
CodispotiA.ColomboE.ZocchiL.SerraV.PertusiG.LeighebG.et al. (2009). Knuckle pads, in an epidermal palmoplantar keratoderma patient with Keratin 9 R163W transgrediens expression. Eur. J. Dermatol.19, 114–118. 10.1684/ejd.2008.0575
6
ColemanC. M.MunroC. S.SmithF. J.UittoJ. W. H. (1999). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma due to a novel type of keratin mutation, a 3-bp insertion in the keratin 9 helix termination motif. Br. J. Dermatol. 140, 486–190. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02715.x
7
CovelloS. P.IrvineA. D.McKennaK. E.MunroC. S.NevinN. C.SmithF. J. (1998). Mutations in keratin K9 in kindreds with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma and epidemiology in northern ireland. J. Invest. Dermatol.111, 1207–1209. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00445.x
8
CsikósM.HollóP.BeckerK.RáczE.HorváthA. S. K. (2003). Novel N160I mutation of keratin 9 in a large pedigree from Hungary with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Acta Derm. Venereol.83, 303–305. 10.1080/00015550310016652
9
DuZ. F.WeiW.WangY. F.ChenX. L.ChenC. Y.LiuW. T.et al. (2011). A novel mutation within the 2B rod domain of keratin 9 in a Chinese pedigree with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma combined with knuckle pads and camptodactyly. Eur. J. Dermatol.21, 675–679. 10.1684/ejd.2011.1458
10
EndoH.HatamochiA. H. (1997). A novel mutation of a leucine residue in coil 1A of keratin 9 in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 109, 113–115. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12276751
11
EscobarL. F.HeimanM.ZimmerD.CareskeyH. (2007). Urorectal septum malformation sequence: prenatal progression, clinical report, and embryology review. Am. J. Med. Genet. A143A, 2722–2726. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31925
12
Fuchs-TelemD.Padalon-BrauchG.SarigO.SprecherE. (2013). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma caused by activation of a cryptic splice site in KRT9. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 38, 189–192: quiz 192. 10.1111/ced.12059
13
FunakushiN.MayuzumiN.SugimuraR. S. I. (2009). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with constriction bands on bilateral fifth toes. Arch. Dermatol.145, 609–610. 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.83
14
GuoY.ShiM.TanZ. P.ShiX. L. (2014). Possible anticipation in familial epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with the p.R163W mutation of Keratin 9. Genet. Mol. Res. 13, 8089–8093. 10.4238/2014.October.7.3
15
HamadaT.IshiiN.KarashimaT.KawanoY. (2005). The common KRT9 gene mutation in a Japanese patient with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma and knuckle pad-like keratoses. J. Dermatol.32, 500–502. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2005.tb00789.x
16
HamadaT.TsurutaD.FukudaS.IshiiN.TeyeK.NumataS.et al. (2013). How do keratinizing disorders and blistering disorders overlap?Exp. Dermatol.22, 83–87. 10.1111/exd.12021
17
HeX. H.ZhangX. N.MaoW.ChenH. P.XuL. R.ChenH.et al. (2004). A novel mutation of keratin 9 in a large Chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Br. J. Dermatol.150, 647–651. 10.1111/j.0007-0963.2004.05865.x
18
HenniesH. C.ZehenderD.KunzeJ.KüsterW.ReisA. (1994). Keratin 9 gene mutational heterogeneity in patients with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Hum Genet. 96, 649–654. 10.1007/BF00201564
19
KeH. P.JiangH. L.LvY. S.HuangY. Z.LiuR. R.ChenX. L.et al. (2014). KRT9 gene mutation as a reliable indicator in the prenatal molecular diagnosis of epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Gene546, 124–128. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.048
20
KobayashiS.TanakaT.MatsuyoshiN.ImamuraS. (1996). Keratin 9 point mutation in the pedigree of epidermolytic hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma perturbs keratin intermediate filament network formation. FEBS Lett.386, 149–155. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00393-6
21
KonA.ItoN.KudoY.NomuraK.YonedaK.HanadaK.et al. (2006). L457F missense mutation within the 2B rod domain of keratin 9 in a Japanese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Br. J. Dermatol.155, 624–626. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07358.x
22
KusterW.ReisA.HenniesH. C. (2002). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma of Vorner: re-evaluation of Vorner's original family and identification of a novel keratin 9 mutation. Arch Dermatol Res. 294, 268–272. 10.1007/s00403-002-0328-9
23
LeeJ. H.AhnK. S.LeeC. H.YounS. J. (2003). Keratin 9 gene mutations in five Korean families with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Exp. Dermatol.12, 876–881. 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2003.00012.x
24
LiM.YangL. J.HuaH. K.ZhuX. H.DaiX. Y. (2009). Keratin-9 gene mutation in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma combined with knuckle pads in a large Chinese family. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.34, 26–28. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02384.x
25
LiM.ZhangG. L.ZhaiJ. X.WeiL.ZhuX. H.DaiX. Y.et al. (2008). [Mutation analysis of the keratin 9 gene in a pedigree with diffuse epidermolytic plamoplantar keratoderma]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 25, 387–389. 10.3321/j.issn:1003-9406.2008.04.004
26
LiY. L.LiN. N.WangY. P.LiM. R.DaiL.DengY.et al. (2012). [Mutation analysis of keratin 9 gene in a family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 29, 280–283. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2012.03.007
27
LiangY. H.LiuQ. X.HuangL.ZengK. (2014). A recurrent p.M157R mutation of keratin 9 gene in a Chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma and literature review. Int. J. Dermatol.53, e375–e379. 10.1111/ijd.12352
28
LinJ. H.LinM. H.YangM. H.ChaoS. C. (2004). A novel keratin 9 gene mutation (Asn160His) in a Taiwanese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.29, 308–310. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01497.x
29
LiuN.ShiH.KongX.WuQ. H. (2014). Mutation analysis and prenatal diagnosis of keratin 9 gene in a large Chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Chin J Med Genet. 31, 48–51. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2014.01.011
30
LiuW. T.KeH. P.ZhaoY.ChenX. L.LuJ. J.DuZ. F.et al. (2012). The most common mutation of KRT9, c.C487T (p.R163W), in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma in two large Chinese pedigrees. Anat. Rec.295, 604–609. 10.1002/ar.22409
31
Lopez-ValdezJ.Rivera-VegaM. R.Gonzalez-HuertaL. M.CazarinJ.Cuevas-CovarrubiasS. (2013). Analysis of the KRT9 gene in a Mexican family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Pediatr. Dermatol.30, 354–358. 10.1111/pde.12027
32
LuY.GuoC.LiuQ.ZhangX.ChengL.LiJ.et al. (2003). A novel mutation of keratin 9 in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma combined with knuckle pads. Am. J. Med. Genet. A120A, 345–349. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20090
33
MaoB.ZhangJ.YouY.XiaoJ.ZhaoX. (2018). Mutations in the highly conserved 1A rod domain of keratin 9 responsible for epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma in four Chinese families. J. Dermatol.45, e45–e46. 10.1111/1346-8138.14087
34
MayuzumiN.ShigiharaT.IkedaS. H. O. (1999). R162W mutation of keratin 9 in a family with autosomal dominant palmoplantar keratoderma with unique histologic features. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc.4, 150–152. 10.1038/sj.jidsp.5640199
35
MorganV. A.ByronK.PaimanL.VarigosG. A.. (1999). A case of spontaneous mutation in the keratin 9 gene associated with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Australas. J. Dermatol.40, 215–216. 10.1046/j.1440-0960.1999.00365.x
36
NavsariaH. A.SwenssonO.RatnavelR. C.ShamsherM.McLeanW. H.LaneE. B.et al. (1995). Ultrastructural changes resulting from keratin-9 gene mutations in two families with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Invest. Dermatol.104, 425–429. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12666011
37
ReisA.HenniesH. C.LangbeinL.DigweedM.MischkeD.DrechslerM.et al. (1994). Keratin 9 gene mutations in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK). Nat. Genet.6, 174–179. 10.1038/ng0294-174
38
RothnagelJ. A.WojcikS.LieferK. M.DomineyA. M.HuberM.HohlD.et al. (1995). Mutations in the 1A domain of keratin 9 in patients with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Invest. Dermatol.104, 430–433. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12666018
39
RuggE. L.CommonJ. E.WilgossA.StevensH. P.BuchanJ.LeighI. M. (2002). Diagnosis and confirmation of epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma by the identification of mutations in keratin 9 using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. Br. J. Dermatol.146, 952–957. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04764.x
40
ShimazuK.TsunemiY.HattoriN.SaekiH.KomineM.AdachiM.et al. (2006). A novel keratin 9 gene mutation (Met156Arg) in a Japanese patient with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Int. J. Dermatol.45, 1128–1130. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02910.x
41
ShimomuraY.WajidM.WeiserJ.KraemerL.ChristianoA. M. (2010). Mutations in the keratin 9 gene in Pakistani families with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.35, 759–764. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03700.x
42
SmithF. J. D. (2003). The molecular genetics of keratin disorders. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.4, 347–364. 10.2165/00128071-200304050-00005
43
SunX.YinX. Z.WuL. Q.ShiX. L.HuZ. M.LiuX. P.et al. (2005). [Hotspot of the mutations of keratin 9 gene in a diffuse palmoplantar keratoderma family]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban30, 521–524. 10.3321/j.issn:1672-7347.2005.05.005
44
SzalaiS.SzalaiC.BeckerK. E. T. (1999). Keratin 9 mutations in the coil 1A region in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Pediatr. Dermatol.16, 430–435. 10.1046/j.1525-1470.1999.00111.x
45
TerrinoniA.CocurocciaB.GubinelliE.ZambrunoG.CandiE.MelinoG.et al. (2004). Identification of the keratin K9 R162W mutation in patients of Italian origin with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Eur. J. Dermatol.14, 375–378. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30442_2.x
46
TorchardD.Blanchet-BardonC.SerovaO.LangbeinL.NarodS.JaninN.et al. (1994). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma cosegregates with a keratin 9 mutation in a pedigree with breast and ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet.6, 106–110. 10.1038/ng0194-106
47
TsunemiY.HattoriN.SaekiH.AdachiM. (2002). A keratin 9 gene mutation (Asn160Ser) in a Japanese patient with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Dermatol.29, 768–772. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2002.tb00220.x
48
UittoJ.RichardG.McGrathJ. A. (2007). Diseases of epidermal keratins and their linker proteins. Exp. Cell Res.313, 1995–2009. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.029
49
UmegakiN.NakanoH.TamaiK.MitsuhashiY.AkasakaE.SawamuraD.et al. (2011). Vorner type palmoplantar keratoderma: novel KRT9 mutation associated with knuckle pad-like lesions and recurrent mutation causing digital mutilation. Br. J. Dermatol.165, 199–201. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10317.x
50
WangK.HeC. D.SongF.LiuJ.ChenH. D. (2010). A novel mutation of the keratin 9 gene in a Chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Int. J. Dermatol.49, 1342–2344. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04295.x
51
WangP.KangX. J.TangX. H.LiuJ. Y.LiW. Z.WangW. J.et al. (2016). Six generations of epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma, associated with a KRT9 R163W mutation. Cancer Genet.209, 515–524. 10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.10.002
52
WarmuthI.Cserhalmi-FriedmanP. B.SchneidermanP.GrossmanM. E.ChristianoA. M. (2000). Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma in a Hispanic kindred resulting from a mutation in the keratin 9 gene. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.25, 244–246. 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2000.00626.x
53
WennerstrandL. M.KlingbergM. H.HoferP. A.LundströmA.LindL. (2003). Mutation in the keratin 9 gene in a family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma from northern Sweden. Acta Derm. Venereol.83, 135–137. 10.1080/00015550310007517
54
XiaoH.GuoY.YiJ.XiaH.XuH.YuanL.et al. (2018). Identification of a novel keratin 9 missense mutation in a chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.46, 1919–1929. 10.1159/000489381
55
YangJ. M.LeeS.KangH. J.LeeJ. H.YeoU. C.SonI. Y.et al. (1998). Mutations in the 1A rod domain segment of the keratin 9 gene in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Acta Derm. Venereol.78, 412–416. 10.1080/000155598442674
56
YangM. H.LeeJ. Y.LinJ. H.ChaoS. C. (2003). De novo mutation of keratin 9 gene in two Taiwanese patients with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. J. Formos. Med. Assoc.102, 492–496. 10.1016/S0885-3924(03)00203-3
57
YinX. Z.ZhangB. R.DingM. P.ZhangH.XiaK.HuZ. M. (2007). [Pathological features and gene mutation analysis in two pedigrees of diffuse palmoplantar keratoderma]. Yi Chuan29, 301–305. 10.1360/yc-007-0301
58
ZengR.HeY.HuiY.LiZ.XuH.LiM.et al. (2017). Identification of a novel mutation of KRT9 gene in a family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Chin J Lepr Skin Dis. 33, 464–467.
59
ZhangB. R.YinX. Z.XiaK.DingM. P.HuZ. M.ZhengM.et al. (2004). [Mutation analysis of keratin 9 gene in a pedigree with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 21, 570–573. 10.3760/j.issn:1003-9406.2004.06.008
60
ZhangX. N.HeX. H.LaiZ.YinW. G.LeY. P.GuoJ. M.et al. (2005). An insertion-deletion mutation in keratin 9 in three Chinese families with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Br. J. Dermatol.152, 804–806. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06477.x
61
ZhangY.ChuG.GaoH.HeR.ZhaoY. (2016). Mutation analysis of keratin 9 gene in a pedigree with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Clin. J. Med. off.44, 805. 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2016.08.12
62
ZhaoJ. J.ZhangZ. H.NiuZ. M.XiangL. H.YeX. Y.HuangW.et al. (2008). Mutation M157R of keratin 9 in a Chinese family with epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Int. J. Dermatol.47, 634–637. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03441.x
Summary
Keywords
epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma, gene mutation, hot spot, KRT9 gene, knuckle pads
Citation
Li Y, Tang L, Han Y, Zheng L, Zhen Q, Yang S and Gao M (2019) Genetic Analysis of KRT9 Gene Revealed Previously Known Mutations and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma. Front. Genet. 9:645. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00645
Received
12 September 2018
Accepted
29 November 2018
Published
07 January 2019
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Musharraf Jelani, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by
Helena Caria, Instituto de Biossistemas e Ciências Integrativas (BioISI), Portugal; Muhammad Tariq, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Li, Tang, Han, Zheng, Zhen, Yang and Gao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Min Gao ahhngm@126.com
This article was submitted to Genetic Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.