Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Genet., 30 June 2015
Sec. Computational Genomics
This article is part of the Research Topic Annotation and Curation of Uncharacterized Proteins: Systems Biology Approaches View all 8 articles

Editorial: Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins: systems biology approaches

  • 1Bioclues.org, Hyderabad, India
  • 2Bioinformatics.org, Hudson, MA, USA
  • 3Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
  • 4Politecnico di Turino, Turin, Italy
  • 5Department of Informatics Center, Shiv Nadar University, Noida, India

Genomes encode thousands of sequences that play significant roles in diverse biological processes. Understanding the biological functions of these sequences is a challenging, yet promising task. Besides a large set of well-known genes, genomes also contain un-annotated regions whose functions are not known, aptly called “known unknowns” (KU) (Logan, 2009). Research on characterizing the KUs has not only been used to analyze the regulatory effects of genome variation, but also to improve next generation sequencing algorithms. In categorizing functional moieties from hypothetical proteins (HPs), functional genomics has opened new opportunities in identifying the cause for many diseases. For example, the machine learning based approach would allow us to predict sequences for larger sets of the KUs. Although systems biology approaches are applied in classifying the probable functions of these KU products, a few challenges remain.

This research topic gives a synopsis of the current state-of-the art methods to classify and functionally annotate uncharacterized proteins. Ijaq et al. (2015) provide one such framework. The authors discuss the need for functional characterization of HPs with next generation sequencing methods to accelerate multiple areas of genomics, and suggest the use of mass spectrometry as a promising analytical technique in validating protein characterization methods. Discovery and classification of HPs is covered in two papers. Barnkob et al. (2014) present a project designed to collect the necessary data in characterizing the expression of all membrane proteins within the scheme on hematopoietic cells. Another work by Micale et al. (2014) deliberates a way to functionally annotate uncharacterized proteins based on local sequence similarities.

To show how the annotation of HPs may be useful, Ravooru et al. (2014) demonstrate how to annotate uncharacterized proteins with the help of metabolic pathways involved in a known disease. There are two papers that focus on practices to optimize the annotation process. In the first one, Mazandu and Mulder (2014) discuss the problem of comparing genomes annotated using Gene Ontology (GO) terms by proposing a genome-scale approach for integrating annotations from different pipelines using semantic similarity measures. In the second paper, Anton et al. (2014) push for the scientific community to accelerate the rate of gene function validation as a necessary paradigm shift in assigning gene function from the gush of new genome sequences.

Keeping in view the need for rapid identification and characterization of un-annotated proteins, we argue that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) may play a large role in understanding the genomic repertoire encoding the un-annotated regions of the genome. We have earlier proposed a six-point classification scoring schema for annotating HPs (Suravajhala and Sundararajan, 2012) and further, the work was projected on the lines of predicting functions using similactors, which are similar proteins and yet not interacting (Benso et al., 2013). We may reason that such approaches may be applicable for these protein interactions. This system-wide omics' approach, we believe would considerably improve the translation of bioinformatics data generated into wet-lab experiments for predicting better drug targets, which in turn may serve as prognostic and diagnostic markers for various diseases (Prensner and Chinnaiyan, 2011). Creating mechanistic archetypes of all uncharacterized regions associated with coding and noncoding genomic repertoire could bring hope for characterizing the uncharacterized.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Associate Editor Dr. Richard Emes for useful suggestions.

References

Anton, B. P., Kasif, S., Roberts, R. J., and Steffen, M. (2014). Objective: biochemical function. Front. Genet. 5:210. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barnkob, M. S., Simon, C., and Olsen, L. R. (2014). Characterizing the human hematopoietic CDome. Front. Genet. 5:331. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benso, A., Carlo, S. D., Rehman, H. U., Politano, G., Savino, A., and Suravajhala, P. (2013). A combined approach for genome wide protein function annotation/prediction. Proteome Sci. 11(Suppl. 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-11-S1-S1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ijaq, J., Chandrasekharan, M., Poddar, R., Bethi, N., and Sundararajan, V. S. (2015). Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins-challenges. Front Genet. 6:119. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Logan, D. C. (2009). Known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns and the propagation of scientific enquiry. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 712–714. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazandu, G. K., and Mulder, N. J. (2014). The use of semantic similarity measures for optimally integrating heterogeneous Gene Ontology data from large scale annotation pipelines. Front. Genet. 5:264. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00264

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Micale, G., Pulvirenti, A., Giugno, R., and Ferro, A. (2014). Proteins comparison through probabilistic optimal structure local alignment. Front. Genet. 5:302. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prensner, J. R., and Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2011). The emergence of lncRNAs in cancer biology. Cancer Discov. 1, 391–407. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravooru, N., Ganji, S., Sathyanarayanan, N., and Nagendra, H. G. (2014). Insilico analysis of hypothetical proteins unveils putative metabolic pathways and essential genes in Leishmania donovani. Front. Genet. 5:291. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suravajhala, P., and Sundararajan, V. S. (2012). A classification scoring schema to validate protein interactors. Bioinformation 8, 34–39. doi: 10.6026/97320630008034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: known unknowns, uncharacterized proteins, regulatory regions, noncoding RNAs, functional genomics, systems biology, annotation

Citation: Suravajhala P, Benso A and Valadi JK (2015) Editorial: Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins: systems biology approaches. Front. Genet. 6:224. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00224

Received: 19 May 2015; Accepted: 12 June 2015;
Published: 30 June 2015.

Edited and reviewed by: Richard D. Emes, University of Nottingham, UK

Copyright © 2015 Suravajhala, Benso and Valadi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Prashanth Suravajhala, prash@bioclues.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.