
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
GENERAL COMMENTARY article
Front. Genet. , 09 October 2014
Sec. Applied Genetic Epidemiology
Volume 5 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00350
This article is part of the Research Topic Genetics Research in Electronic Health Records Linked to DNA Biobanks View all 21 articles
This article is a commentary on:
Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering
A corrigendum on
Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering
by Sun, X., Lu, Q., Mukheerjee, S., Crane, P. K., Elston, R., and Ritchie, M. D. (2014) Front Genet. 5:106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00106
My name was misspelled as Shubhabrata Mukheerjee. The correct spelling is Shubhabrata Mukherjee. The original article has been updated.
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: epistasis, genetic interaction, biological interaction, filtering pipeline, optimal search
Citation: Mukherjee S (2014) Corrigendum: Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering. Front. Genet. 5:350. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00350
Received: 09 July 2014; Accepted: 18 September 2014;
Published online: 09 October 2014.
Edited and reviewed by: David B. Allison, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA
Copyright © 2014 Mukherjee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence:c211a2hlcmpAdS53YXNoaW5ndG9uLmVkdQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.