Skip to main content

GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Genet., 09 October 2014
Sec. Applied Genetic Epidemiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Genetics Research in Electronic Health Records Linked to DNA Biobanks View all 21 articles

Corrigendum: Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering

  • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

A corrigendum on
Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering

by Sun, X., Lu, Q., Mukheerjee, S., Crane, P. K., Elston, R., and Ritchie, M. D. (2014) Front Genet. 5:106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00106

My name was misspelled as Shubhabrata Mukheerjee. The correct spelling is Shubhabrata Mukherjee. The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Keywords: epistasis, genetic interaction, biological interaction, filtering pipeline, optimal search

Citation: Mukherjee S (2014) Corrigendum: Analysis pipeline for the epistasis search – statistical versus biological filtering. Front. Genet. 5:350. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00350

Received: 09 July 2014; Accepted: 18 September 2014;
Published online: 09 October 2014.

Edited and reviewed by: David B. Allison, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA

Copyright © 2014 Mukherjee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: smukherj@u.washington.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.