Christos Mammides
Jun Ma
Bastian Bertzky
Andreas Langner- 1Nature Conservation Unit, Frederick University, Nicosia, Cyprus
- 2Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- 3European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Global Patterns and Drivers of Forest Loss and Degradation Within Protected Areas
Forests host most of the world's terrestrial biodiversity and are a major carbon sink (Brockerhoff et al., 2017; FAO and UNEP, 2020). Yet, forests across the globe continue to be degraded and lost (Curtis et al., 2018; FAO and UNEP, 2020) resulting in significant biodiversity declines and increases in human-induced carbon emissions (Houghton and Nassikas, 2018; Qin et al., 2021). Protected areas (PAs) represent one of our most important strategies for safeguarding forests and the ecosystem services they provide (Watson et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2019). Several studies, however, have shown that deforestation rates remain high even within many of the world's PAs (Wade et al., 2020; Wolf et al., 2021). Hence, understanding the patterns and drivers of forest loss and degradation within PAs remains a key research objective. This collection brings together a series of articles that shed light on essential aspects of those patterns and drivers.
Fritz et al. used a novel dataset developed through the visual interpretation of high-resolution satellite imagery by volunteers to quantify global patterns and drivers of forest loss within the world's tropical regions for the period 2008 to 2019. The authors showed that most deforestation has occurred in Latin America, followed by Asia and Africa. Forest loss within PAs in Latin America and Africa was lower than in unprotected areas, but the opposite was true in Asia. In fact, forest loss rates within PAs in Asia were more than double the corresponding rates in Latin America and Africa. The main drivers of deforestation within PAs were pastures and shifting cultivation in Latin America and shifting cultivation and other subsistence agriculture in Africa. In Asia, the main drivers were forest management (e.g., logging and timber plantations) and shifting cultivation, followed closely by commercial oil palm plantations. Deforestation rates within strict PAs (defined by the authors as those belonging to IUCN Categories I-IV) were not necessarily lower than in other PAs, a finding in line with other recent studies (Leberger et al., 2020; Elleason et al., 2021). Alejo et al. evaluated the effectiveness of community-managed PAs in Petén, Guatemala and Acre, Brazil, in terms of their capacity to preserve carbon stocks through avoided land-use carbon emissions. They found that community-managed PAs were as effective as strict PAs (i.e., areas in IUCN Categories I-IV) and even more effective than PAs where multiple sustainable human uses are permitted (IUCN Categories V-VI). Consequently, Alejo et al. concluded that the decentralized governance of PAs—in which social and ecological outcomes could potentially converge—can play an important role in mitigating climate change.
Imron et al. used a dataset capturing forest fires over a 15-year period to assess the conservation effectiveness of PAs, specifically of the Padang Sugihan Wildlife Reserve (PSWR) in Indonesia—a tropical peatland important for the conservation of the Sumatran elephant and other endangered species. The authors found that compared to the 10 km buffer surrounding the wildlife reserve, there were fewer fire occurrences within PSWR during the wet years. However, during the dry years, the fire incidents within PSWR were as frequent as in the surrounding buffer, especially in parts of the reserve with higher human access, such as near canals and roads. Lisboa et al. also examined the impact of roads within forested PAs, focusing this time on the plant communities in the Moribane Forest Reserve in Mozambique. They found that areas near roads tended to have higher plant species richness, which was albeit driven—at least partly—by the increased presence of alien plant species.
Massinga et al. explored the socioeconomic factors driving forest loss in two PAs in Mozambique, namely the Moribane Forest Reserve and Serra Chôa. The authors overlayed spatial data capturing the rates of tree cover loss within the PAs between the years 2000 to 2020 and socioeconomic data collected through social surveys. They found that higher deforestation rates tended to be associated with increased access to markets and better road infrastructure. These two factors alone made agriculture—and consequently forest clearing—an attractive source of income for the local communities, particularly in the absence of alternative income sources. On a larger scale, however, Dehmel et al. found that human development correlated negatively with tree cover loss in PAs in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of the analysis of Dehmel et al. was to explore a potential link between good governance and reduced deforestation rates within PAs. Governance is often cited as a major factor affecting the effectiveness of PAs worldwide; however, its exact influence remains challenging to assess on a large scale (Geldmann et al., 2019; Mammides, 2020). Dehmel et al. showed that governance—measured at the country level using the Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG)—was only weakly correlated with tree cover loss within PAs (and only after environmental governance was included in the model). Lastly, Lawrence et al. showed that the climate effects of the carbon released from the aboveground forest biomass due to forest loss and degradation are determined also by shifts in biophysical processes (e.g., water and energy balances). This finding is important because it suggests that the role of forests for climate change mitigation and adaptation is even greater than previously thought due to the additional cooling effects that forests provide through these biophysical processes, particularly in the tropics.
Together, the articles in this collection highlight a wide range of important factors impacting forest loss and degradation within PAs from local to continental scales. They demonstrate that the effectiveness of forested PAs depends on the complex interplay between governance and management arrangements, socioeconomic factors, and anthropogenic pressures and threats. Ensuring effective forest protection, therefore, is vital for achieving global biodiversity and climate targets and for safeguarding local livelihoods.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to all the authors and reviewers who have contributed to this Research Topic. We are also thankful to Dr. Jiajia Liu for serving as a guest editor for two of the manuscripts.
References
Brockerhoff, E. G., Barbaro, L., Castagneyrol, B., Forrester, D. I., Gardiner, B., González-Olabarria, J. R., et al. (2017). Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiv. Conserv. 26, 3005–3035. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A., and Hansen, M. C. (2018). Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445
Elleason, M., Guan, Z., Deng, Y., Jiang, A., Goodale, E., and Mammides, C. (2021). Strictly protected areas are not necessarily more effective than areas in which multiple human uses are permitted. Ambio. 50, 1058–1073. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01426-5
FAO and UNEP (2020). The State of the World's Forests 2020: Forests, Biodiversity and People. Rome, Italy: FAO and UNEP.
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L., and Balmford, A. (2019). A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 23209–23215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116
Houghton, R. A., and Nassikas, A. A. (2018). Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally. Global Change Biol. 24, 350–359. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13876
Leberger, R., Rosa, I. M. D., Guerra, C. A., Wolf, F., and Pereira, H. M. (2020). Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108299. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299
Mammides, C. (2020). A global analysis of the drivers of human pressure within protected areas at the national level. Sustain. Sci. 15, 1223–1232. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00809-7
Qin, Y., Xiao, X., Wigneron, J.-P., Ciais, P., Brandt, M., Fan, L., et al. (2021). Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Clim. Change. 11, 442–448. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01026-5
Wade, C. M., Austin, K. G., Cajka, J., Lapidus, D., Everett, K. H., Galperin, D., et al. (2020). What is threatening forests in protected areas? A global assessment of deforestation in protected areas, 2001–2018. Forests. 11, 539. doi: 10.3390/f11050539
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., and Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature. 515, 67–73. doi: 10.1038/nature13947
Wolf, C., Levi, T., Ripple, W. J., Zárrate-Charry, D. A., and Betts, M. G. (2021). A forest loss report card for the world's protected areas. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 520–529. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01389-0
Keywords: protected areas, biodiversity conservation, deforestation, climate mitigation, carbon sequestration
Citation: Mammides C, Ma J, Bertzky B and Langner A (2022) Editorial: Global Patterns and Drivers of Forest Loss and Degradation Within Protected Areas. Front. For. Glob. Change 5:907537. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.907537
Received: 29 March 2022; Accepted: 22 April 2022;
Published: 18 May 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: John Robert Healey, Bangor University, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2022 Mammides, Ma, Bertzky and Langner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christos Mammides, Y21hbW1pZGVzJiN4MDAwNDA7Z21haWwuY29t