data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Ecol. Evol. , 26 March 2024
Sec. Phylogenetics, Phylogenomics, and Systematics
Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1369318
This article is a correction to:
The Taxonomic Revolution of New World dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)
A Corrigendum on:
The Taxonomic Revolution of New World dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)
by Cupello M, Silva FAB and Vaz-De-Mello FZ (2023) 11:1168754. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1168754
In the published article, there were two errors.
In the Appendix, it was incorrectly indicated that the oniticelline genus Anoplodrepanus Simonis, 1981 encompassed three species. The genus actually has only two, both endemic to Jamaica. The original error was a typo. Owing to this, the number of species stated for the subtribe Oniticellina, to which Anoplodrepanus belongs, and the tribe Oniticellini as a whole is erroneous; instead of 5 and 8, respectively, it should be 4 and 7. We thank our colleague Bert Kohlmann for calling our attention to this error. The text has been updated as follows:
Oniticellini Kolbe, 1905 (4 gg., 7 spp.)
Attavicina Philips, 2016 (1 g., 1 sp.)
Attavicinus Philips and Bell, 2008 (1 sp.)
Liatongina Philips, 2016 (1 g., 2 spp.)
Liatongus Reitter, 1893 (2 spp.)
Oniticellina Kolbe, 1905 (2 gg., 4 spp.)
Anoplodrepanus Simonis, 1981 (2 spp.)
Euoniticellus Janssens, 1953 (2 spp.)
The second problem, also in the Appendix, was the lack of indentation for the nominotypical subgenus of Dendropaemon Perty, 1830, giving the misleading appearance of its being a genus instead of a subgenus. The text has been updated as follows:
Phanaeina Kolbe, 1838 (9 gg., 208 spp.)
Bolbites Harold, 1868 (1 sp.)
Coprophanaeus dOlsoufieff, 1924 (50 spp.)
Coprophanaeus s. str. (38 spp.)
Coprophanaeus (Megaphanaeus) dOlsoufieff, 1924
(4 spp.)
Coprophanaeus (Metallophanaeus) dOlsoufieff, 1924
(8 spp.)
Dendropaemon Perty, 1830 (41 spp.)
Dendropaemon s. str. (9 spp.)
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: systematics, Neotropical, Nearctic, scarabs, catalogue, taxonomic revision, taxonomic monograph, phylogenetics
Citation: Cupello M, Silva FAB and Vaz-De-Mello F Z (2024) Corrigendum: The Taxonomic Revolution of New World dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Front. Ecol. Evol. 12:1369318. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1369318
Received: 12 January 2024; Accepted: 06 February 2024;
Published: 26 March 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Cupello, Silva and Vaz-De-Mello. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mario Cupello, bWN1cGVsbG9AaG90bWFpbC5jb20=
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.