Joachim Ruther
Thomas Schmitt
Johannes Stökl- 1Institute of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- 2Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocentre, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- 3Department of Evolutionary Animal Ecology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Recent advances in the chemical ecology of parasitic Hymenoptera
The Hymenoptera order is considered one of, if not the most diverse taxon of animals on Earth, largely due to the hyperdiverse parasitic wasps, countless of which still await discovery and scientific description (Forbes et al., 2018). Parasitic wasps share a common way of life in that they develop in or on other arthropods and kill their host no later than the end of their development. Therefore, they play a key role in ecosystem functioning by controlling arthropod populations (Quicke, 1997). Due to their lifestyle, parasitic wasps are also suitable for selective and environmentally friendly control of insect pests. The effective use as biocontrol agents requires knowledge about all aspects influencing the reproductive success of parasitic wasps. This has led to a large community of researchers worldwide dedicated to the study of parasitic hymenopterans. However, it is not only application-related aspects that make parasitic wasps valuable research objects; some species such as the pteromalid wasp Nasonia vitripennis have achieved the status of model organisms suitable to answer fundamental questions in biology (Werren and Loehlin, 2009; Werren et al., 2010).
The genus Nasonia consists of four species, the cosmopolitan N. vitripennis and the North American species N. giraulti, N. longicornis and N. oneida. Mate finding in Nasonia species is mediated by male-derived sex pheromones. All species share the pheromone components (4R, 5S)-5-hydroxy-4-decanolide and 4-methylquinazoline while only males of N. vitripennis produce significant amounts of the additional component (4R, 5R)-5-hydroxy-4-decanolide (Niehuis et al., 2013). Kurtanovic et al. report in this Research Topic that N. longicornis females respond specifically to the conspecific male sex pheromone and discriminate against the pheromone of the sympatric species N. vitripennis by using (4R, 5R)-5-hydroxy-4-decanolide, the pheromone component newly evolved in N. vitripennis. Interspecific courtship and mating, as being common in the genus Nasonia, are usually associated with evolutionary costs for female insects. The study shows that females can avoid costly sexual interactions with males of a closely related sympatric species by discriminating against a pheromone component that evolved in the interacting species.
Apart from mate finding, the ability to locate suitable hosts is another factor that influences the reproductive success of parasitic wasps. Also for this process, females use chemical information emitted by the host or host-associated materials. A recent study (Malec et al., 2021) has demonstrated for a German Nasonia vitripennis population the existence of two ecotypes one of which parasitizing fly pupae mainly in bird nests, while the other occurs near carcasses where host species are also abundant. Accordingly, females of the two ecotypes preferred the odors of the respective habitats. Additionally, females from the carcass-ecotype had a higher parasitization rate on carrion flies and microsatellite analyses supported a subpopulation structure. Using a different approach, Buellesbach et al. did not find any differences in the CHC-profiles of wasps from bird nests and carcasses in a N. vitripennis population from the Netherlands. Also, microsatellite analyses did not reveal any subpopulation structure suggesting the absence of ecotypes in the Dutch N. vitripennis population. Now, it will be interesting to investigate how this population performs with respect to the other parameters investigated in the previous study.
Plants that are eaten by herbivores, or even just carry herbivore eggs, are induced to synthesize volatiles that attract parasitic wasps, helping the plants get rid of the attacker (Hilker and Fatouros, 2015; Turlings and Erb, 2018). These findings have initiated tremendous research activities in the past decades, which continue to produce new insights into various aspects of this fascinating phenomenon. Ross et al. demonstrate in their study that the odor of intact maize plants interferes with the landing response of the braconid wasp Cotesia kariyai on neighboring herbivore-infested plants. The authors were able to isolate the responsible compounds by dynamic headspace sampling, opening the door for the identification of the compounds modifying the parasitoids’ behavior. Chierici et al. demonstrate that not only the presence of intact plants but also the host species a parasitoid developed in may influence its response to induced plant volatiles. In their study, the authors investigated the response of the egg parasitoid Trissolcus japonicus, a promising biocontrol agent of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), Halyomorpha halys, to oviposition-induced bean plants. T. japonicus may use eggs of other stink bugs as alternative hosts. Females developing in the preferred host BMSB specifically preferred the volatiles released by the Vicia faba/BMSB plant-herbivore complex whereas wasps originating from sub-optimal alternative hosts neither preferred Vicia faba/BMSB volatiles nor the odor of the plant-herbivore complex they originated from. These results are of great importance for optimizing biocontrol of BMSB by T. japanicus. They suggest that the use of readily available alternative hosts for rearing parasitic wasps may reduce their efficacy as biocontrol agents when the target pest is a different species. Bogka et al. investigated the olfactory response of the braconid wasp Psyttalia concolor, a natural enemy of the olive fly, Bactrocera olae. Both olive fruits infested by olive fly larvae and female olive fly-derived compounds attracted female P. concolor in bioassays. Mere oviposition, albeit changing the volatile profile of infested olive fruits, did not influence the behavior of the parasitoid. Chemical analyses revealed some promising candidate chemicals for further bioassay testing and application to increase the efficacy of P. concolor in olive fly control.
Parasitoids have also been used successfully to control stored product pest (Schöller et al., 2018). The bethylid wasp Holepyris sylvanidis is a larval parasitoid of different stored product infesting beetles including the confused flour beetle (CFB), Tribolium confusum. Awater-Salendo et al. demonstrate that females respond in a dose-sensitive manner to a two-component synthetic kairomone identified previously in the larval feces of the host. In microcosm experiments, it was shown that the presence of this kairomone increased the efficacy of the parasitoid against CFB. Interestingly, the offspring sex ratio was skewed towards males when the kairomone was present which is likely to impede the desired biocontrol effect in the next generation. This emphasizes that semiochemicals have the potential to augment biocontrol by parasitic wasps but there might be adverse side effects that need to be considered.
We hope readers enjoy this compilation of cutting-edge research papers on the fascinating biology of parasitic wasps.
Author contributions
JR: Writing – original draft. TS: Writing – review & editing. JS: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Forbes A. A., Bagley R. K., Beer M. A., Hippee A. C., Widmayer H. A. (2018). Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order. BMC Ecol. 18, 21. doi: 10.1186/s12898-018-0176-x
Hilker M., Fatouros N. E. (2015). Plant responses to insect egg deposition. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60, 493–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020620
Malec P., Weber J., Bohmer R., Fiebig M., Meinert D., Rein C., et al. (2021). The emergence of ecotypes in a parasitoid wasp: a case of incipient sympatric speciation in Hymenoptera? BMC Ecol. Evol. 21, 204. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01938-y
Niehuis O., Büllesbach J., Gibson J. D., Pothmann D., Hanner C., Navdeep M., et al. (2013). Behavioural and genetic analyses of Nasonia shed light on the evolution of sex pheromones. Nature 494, 345–348. doi: 10.1038/nature11838
Schöller M., Prozell S., Suma P., Russo A. (2018). “Biological control of stored-product insects,” in Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection. Eds. Athanassiou C. G., Arthur F. H. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 183–209.
Turlings T. C. J., Erb M. (2018). Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63, 433–452. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043507
Werren J. H., Loehlin D. W. (2009). The parasitoid wasp Nasonia: an emerging model system with haploid male genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. pdb.emo134. doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo134
Keywords: parasitic Hymenoptera, parasitoid wasps, pheromones, synomones, kairomones, communication
Citation: Ruther J, Schmitt T and Stökl J (2023) Editorial: Recent advances in the chemical ecology of parasitic Hymenoptera. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11:1310233. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1310233
Received: 09 October 2023; Accepted: 11 October 2023;
Published: 19 October 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Stefano Colazza, University of Palermo, ItalyCopyright © 2023 Ruther, Schmitt and Stökl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joachim Ruther, am9hY2hpbS5ydXRoZXJAdXIuZGU=