John Abraham
Sergio Angeli
Josephine Bema Antwi
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona- 1Department of Conservation Biology and Entomology, School of Biological Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
- 2Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
- 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA, United States
- 4Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Research Advances on Drosophila suzukii
In this Research Topic, we present research advances on the chemical ecology of the spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), an insect pest from Southeast Asia (Kanzawa, 1939; Calabria et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2011) that causes significant economic damage to soft, thin-skinned small fruits and stone fruits (Goodhue et al., 2011; Farnsworth et al., 2017; Knapp and Mazzi, 2021). It became an invasive pest almost concurrently in 2008 in Europe (Calabria et al., 2010) and North America (Hauser, 2011), and has now spread to South America (Deprá et al., 2014) and sub-Saharan Africa (Boughdad et al., 2021; Kwadha et al., 2021). Recent records suggest that plants from 13 families are hosts to D. suzukii (Cloonan et al., 2018).
The fast rate at which D. suzukii caused damage to multiple crops, including blueberry, cherry, strawberry and raspberry, necessitated intensification of surveillance, resulting in its detection in new areas (Asplen et al., 2015; Lavrinienko et al., 2017). Along with monitoring its presence, on-going research has aimed at understanding its behavior (e.g., Abraham et al., 2015; Revadi et al., 2015a,b; Rice et al., 2016; Wallingford et al., 2016; Belenioti and Chaniotakis, 2020). In this Research Topic, Kraft et al. provide further advances in research on D. suzukii feeding behavior by way of molecular gut content analysis, showing that adults' use of food resources is species- and substrate-specific within fruit types, and that freshly eclosed adults feed on pupal meconium probably to obtain symbiotic bacteria. Indeed, this symbiotic association has been suggested in an earlier review (Broderick and Lemaitre, 2012). Kraft et al. have also demonstrated that D. suzukii adults utilize resources within crop fields and surroundings non-crop habitats. In another paper, Stockton and Loeb demonstrated that the oviposition choice by gravid D. suzukii females is fixed and guided by a hierarchical system—females utilize other potential hosts as oviposition site only when their preferred choice is not available. This is in line with the finding by Kraft et al. showing that D. suzukii utilize both crop and non-crop habitats for resources. Of course, they utilize non-crop resources only when their preferred resources are unavailable in crop fields.
The ability of D. suzukii to utilize both crop and non-crop plants and spread to new territories requires the development of new traps and attractants for its monitoring and management (e.g., Lee et al., 2013; Cha et al., 2014; Renkema et al., 2014; Kirkpatrick et al., 2018; Lasa et al., 2019). However, many traps and attractants in use are not selective, capturing many non-targets. This could be problematic for early detection during surveillance if identification is not accurate, especially because male D. suzukii share their characteristic black spot with their sister species Drosophila biarmipes Malloch and Drosophila subpulchrella Takamori and Watabe (Cini et al., 2012). To improve early detection of D. suzukii to kick-start intervention, the paper by Piper et al. demonstrated that a non-destructive high-throughput DNA metabarcoding could be used to detect D. suzukii and discriminate it from its closest relatives and other non-target arthropods in large, unsorted trap catches by an accuracy of 96%. This technique identified D. biarmipes and D. subpulchrella by an accuracy of 100% and could identify 57 other arthropods that are not targeted in insect surveillance. This is a major advancement in surveillance and early detection.
Field trapping and surveillance rely heavily on attractants. Earlier studies have demonstrated that odors from the fruit puree (Abraham et al., 2015) and intact fruits (Revadi et al., 2015b) of host plants, including raspberry, strawberry, blueberry, and cherry, are highly attractive to both female and male D. suzukii, and that females use these odors as oviposition cues (Karageorgi et al., 2017; Cloonan et al., 2018). Based on this knowledge, the article by Piñero et al. demonstrated that diluted concord grape juice is as attractive, and in some cases more attractive, than commercial attractants. It is interesting to note that, in cage experiments, diluted concord grape juice attracted more females and males than AlphaScents® SWD lure and Scentry® SWD lure, which are commercial attractants. Moreover, diluted concord grape juice attracted more females than other commercial lures, i.e., Suzukii Trap® Max Captures, Trécé broad spectrum PEEL-PAK® multi-component lure, and Trécé high selectivity 3-component lure. A similar trend was observed in field captures. Addition of NaCl to diluted concord grape juice increased D. suzukii captures by four-fold, while reducing the capture of non-target drosophilids. This demonstrates a potential inexpensive bait formulation that could be used for large scale surveillance.
In a related laboratory study, the article by Bolton et al. demonstrated that synthetic blends of fruit volatile compounds are attractive to both female and male D. suzukii. In an earlier study (Abraham et al., 2015), we showed that female D. suzukii were significantly attracted to both fruit extracts and an 11-component synthetic blend from electrophysiologically-active volatile compounds from raspberry extract. However, when given a choice between the raspberry extract and the synthetic blend, females were more attracted to the fruit extract (Abraham et al., 2015). Clearly, there was a need to optimize the 11-component synthetic blend. Using a similar technique, Bolton et al. optimized synthetic fruit volatiles by combining them with isoamyl acetate and β-cyclocitral, a strawberry leaf volatile compound known to be attractive to D. suzukii (Keesey et al., 2015). In the end, Bolton et al. have succeeded in formulating a 3-component synthetic blend consisting of isoamyl acetate, β-cyclocitral, and methyl butyrate, which is very attractive to female D. suzukii but not attractive to the non-target D. melanogaster under laboratory conditions. This blend could be a promising candidate attractant for monitoring D. suzukii populations in crop fields if it works in field trials. This research contributes to current efforts to identify attractive blends for D. suzukii (Larson et al., 2021).
Attractants can be combined with killing agents (i.e., insecticides) to develop attract-and-kill strategies to manage D. suzukii; however, the type of insecticide can influence their efficacy. In a paper by Babu et al., the authors tested a novel product (ACTTRA SWD®) that can be mixed with an insecticide as an attract-and-kill strategy for managing D. suzukii. In a series of no-choice and choice bioassays, they identified fenpropathrin, cyantraniliprole, malathion, zeta-cypermethrin, and spinosad as insecticides that could be added to ACTTRA SWD® formulations for an effective attract-and-kill technique to manage D. suzukii.
Overall, the contributions to this Research Topic add to current knowledge on how chemical ecology can be applied to improve monitoring and management tools for D. suzukii that can complement, and thereby reduce, the use of synthetic insecticides.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the 14 reviewers of the contributions to this Research Topic for helping us settle on quality contributions. We are equally grateful to Gianfranco Anfora for accepting to edit one of the contributions we received.
References
Abraham, J., Zhang, A., Angeli, S., Abubeker, S., Michel, C., Feng, Y., et al. (2015). Behavioral and antennal responses of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to volatiles from fruit extracts. Environ. Entomol. 44, 356–367. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv013
Asplen, M., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D., Chu, D., Daane, K., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities. J. Pest. Sci. 88, 469–494. doi: 10.1007/s10340-015-0681-z
Belenioti, M., and Chaniotakis, N. (2020). Aggressive behaviour of Drosophila suzukii in relation to environmental and social factors. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64941-1
Boughdad, A., Haddi, K., El Bouazzati, A., Nassiri, A., Tahiri, A., El Anbri, C., Eddaya, T., Zaid, A., and Biondi, A. (2021). First record of the invasive spotted wing Drosophila infesting berry crops in Africa. J. Pest. Sci. 94, 261–271. doi: 10.1007/s10340-020-01280-0
Broderick, N. A., and Lemaitre, B. (2012). Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut. Microb. 3, 307–321. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19896
Calabria, G., Máca, J., Bächli, G., Serra, L., and Pascual, M. (2010). First records of the potential pest species Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Europe. J. Appl. Entomol. 136, 139–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01583.x
Cha, D. H., Adams, T., Werle, C. T., Sampson, B. J., Adamczyk, J. J. Jr, Rogg, H., et al. (2014). A four-component synthetic attractant for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) isolated from fermented bait headspace. Pest. Manag. Sci. 70(2), 324–331. doi: 10.1002/ps.3568
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., and Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull. Insectol. 65, 149–160.
Cloonan, K. R., Abraham, J., Angeli, S., Syed, Z., and Rodriguez-Saona, C. (2018). Advances in the chemical ecology of the spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) and its applications. J. Chem. Ecol. 44, 922–939. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-1000-y
Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., and Valente, V. L. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. J. Pest. Sci. 87, 379–383. doi: 10.1007/s10340-014-0591-5
Farnsworth, D., Hamby, K.A., Bolda, M., Goodhue, R.E., Williams, J.C., and Zalom, F.G. (2017). Economic analysis of revenue losses and control costs associated with the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), in the California raspberry industry. Pest. Manag. Sci. 73, 1083–1090. doi: 10.1002/ps.4497
Goodhue, R., Bolda, M., Farnsworth, D., Williams, J., and Zalom, F. (2011). Spotted wing drosophila infestation of California strawberries and raspberries: economic analysis of potential revenue losses and control costs. Pest. Manag. Sci. 67, 1396–1402. doi: 10.1002/ps.2259
Hauser, M.. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest. Manag. Sci. 67, 1352–1357. doi: 10.1002/ps.2265
Kanzawa, T.. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Mats. Yamanashi Prefecture Agricultural Experimental Station, Kofu, Japan.
Karageorgi, M., Bräcker, L, Lebreton, S., Minervino, C., Cavey, M., et al. (2017). Evolution of multiple sensory systems drives novel egg-laying behavior in the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. Curr. Biol. 27, 847–853. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.055
Keesey, I. W., Knaden, M., and Hansson, B. S. (2015). Olfactory specialization in Drosophila suzukii supports and ecological shift in host preferences from rotten to fresh fruit. J. Chem. Ecol. 41, 121–128. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0544-3
Kirkpatrick, D. M., Gut, L. J., and Miller, J. R. (2018). Development of a novel dry, sticky trap design incorporating visual cues for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111, 1775–1779. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy097
Knapp, L., Mazzi, D., and Finger, R. (2021). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii: perceived costs and revenue losses of Swiss cherry, plum and grape growers. Pest. Manag. Sci. 77, 978–1000. doi: 10.1002/ps.6110
Kwadha, C. A., Okwaro, L. A., Kleman, I., Rehermann, G., Revadi, S., Ndlela, S., et al. (2021). Detection of the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, in continental sub-Saharan Africa. J. Pest. Sci. 94, 251–259. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01330-1
Larson, N. R., Strickland, J., Shields, V. D., Rodriguez-Saona, C., Cloonan, K., Short, B. D., Leskey, T. C., and Zhang, A. (2021). Field evaluation of different attractants for detecting and monitoring Drosophila suzukii. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:620445. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.620445
Lasa, R., Toledo-Hernández, R. A., Rodríguez, D., and Williams, T. (2019). Raspberry as a source for the development of Drosophila suzukii attractants: Laboratory and commercial polytunnel trials. Insects 10, 137. doi: 10.3390/insects10050137
Lavrinienko, A., Kesäniemi, J., Watts, P. C., Serga, S., Pascual, M., Mestres, F., et al. (2017). First record of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in Ukraine indicates multiple sources of invasion. J. Pest. Sci. 90, 421–429. doi: 10.1007/s10340-016-0810-3
Lee, J. C., Shearer, P. W, Barrantes, L. D., Beers, E. H., Burrack, H. J., Dalton, D. T., et al. (2013). Trap designs for monitoring Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ. Entomol. 42, 1348–1355. doi: 10.1603/EN13148
Renkema, J. M., Buitenhuis, R., and Hallett, R. H. (2014). Optimizing trap design and trapping protocols for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 107, 2107–2118. doi: 10.1603/EC14254
Revadi, S., Lebreton, S., Witzgall, P., Anfora, G., Dekker, T., and Becher, P. G. (2015a). Sexual behavior of Drosophila suzukii. Insects 6, 183–196. doi: 10.3390/insects6010183
Revadi, S., Vitagliano, S., Rossi Stacconi, M.V., Ramasamy, S., Mansourian, S., Carlin, S., et al. (2015b). Olfactory responses of Drosophila suzukii females to host plant volatiles. Physiol. Entomol. 40, 54–64. doi: 10.1111/phen.12088
Rice, K. B., Short, B. D., Jones, S. K., and Leskey, T. C. (2016). Behavioral responses of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to visual stimuli under laboratory, semifield, and field conditions. Environ. Entomol. 45, 1480–1488. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvw123
Wallingford, A. K., Hesler, S. P., Cha, D. H., and Loeb, G. M. (2016). Behavioral response of spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii Matsumura, to aversive odors and a potential oviposition deterrent in the field. Pest. Manag. Sci. 72, 701–706. doi: 10.1002/ps.4040
Keywords: spotted-wing drosophila, chemical ecology, semiochemicals, monitoring, pest management
Citation: Abraham J, Angeli S, Antwi JB and Rodriguez-Saona C (2022) Editorial: Research Advances on Drosophila suzukii. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:897222. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.897222
Received: 15 March 2022; Accepted: 31 March 2022;
Published: 25 April 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Panagiotis Milonas, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Greece
Copyright © 2022 Abraham, Angeli, Antwi and Rodriguez-Saona. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John Abraham, amFicmFoYW0mI3gwMDA0MDt1Y2MuZWR1Lmdo
†ORCID: John Abraham orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-6042
Sergio Angeli orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-7476
Josephine Bema Antwi orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-7248
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-1769