Evaporative Water Loss and Stopover Behavior in Three Passerine Bird Species During Autumn Migration

Paces, Bernhard; Waringer, Barbara M.; Domer, Adi; Burns, Darren; Zvik, Yoram; Wojciechowski, Michał S.; Shochat, Eyal; Sapir, Nir; Maggini, Ivan

doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.704676

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol., 02 August 2021

Sec. Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology

Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.704676

This article is part of the Research Topic Ecophysiological Adaptations Associated with Animal Migration View all 15 articles

Evaporative Water Loss and Stopover Behavior in Three Passerine Bird Species During Autumn Migration

$\r\nBernhard Paces$ Bernhard Paces¹

Barbara M. Waringer¹

Adi Domer²

Darren Burns²

Yoram Zvik^2,3

Michał S. Wojciechowski⁴

Eyal Shochat²

Nir Sapir⁵

Ivan Maggini^6*

¹Division of Tropical Ecology and Animal Biodiversity, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
²Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
³Hoopoe Ornithology & Ecology Center, Yeroham, Israel
⁴Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Ecology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
⁵Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, and Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
⁶Konrad-Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Migratory birds are often not specifically adapted to arid conditions, yet several species travel across deserts during their journeys, and often have more or less short stopovers there. We investigated whether differences in thermoregulatory mechanisms, specifically evaporative cooling, explain the different behavior of three passerine species while stopping over in the Negev desert, Israel. We measured cutaneous water loss (CWL) under ambient conditions and the temperature of panting onset in an experimental setup. In addition, we performed behavioral observations of birds at a stopover site where we manipulated water availability. Blackcaps had slightly higher CWL at relatively low temperatures than Willow Warblers and Lesser Whitethroats. When considered relative to total body mass, however, Willow Warblers had the highest CWL of the three species. Blackcaps started panting at lower ambient temperature than the other two species. Taken together, these results suggest that Willow Warblers are the most efficient in cooling their body, possibly with the cost of needing to regain water by actively foraging during their staging. Lesser Whitethroats had a similar pattern, which was reflected in their slightly higher levels of activity and drinking behavior when water was available. However, in general the behavior of migratory species was not affected by the availability of water, and they were observed drinking rather rarely. Our results indicate that differences in thermoregulatory mechanisms might be at the basis of the evolution of different stopover strategies of migratory birds while crossing arid areas such as deserts.

Introduction

Thermoregulation in desert habitats is a challenge for endothermic animals. When ambient temperatures (T_a) exceed body temperature (T_b), they need to dissipate excess heat produced endogenously as well as gained from the environment to regulate T_b. Consequently, several behavioral and physiological strategies have evolved among desert-living animals to cope with these conditions. Behavioral strategies include avoiding exposure to excessive heat by e.g., living in burrows, or being active when temperatures are not at their maximum (Yousef and Dill, 1971; Abáigar et al., 2018; Whitford and Duval, 2020). The only way to dissipate body heat at T_a > T_b is to evaporate water from body surfaces (Dawson, 1982), but since water is scarce in the desert, several mechanisms have evolved in desert species to reduce evaporative water loss and avoid dehydration (King and Farner, 1961; Louw, 1993; Williams and Tieleman, 2005; Donald and Pannabecker, 2015). In birds, evaporative cooling is primarily achieved through cutaneous water loss (CWL) and respiratory water loss (RWL) (Whittow, 1986; Williams and Tieleman, 2005; McKechnie and Wolf, 2019). The proportion of CWL and RWL to total evaporative water loss (TEWL) varies among species, but it is generally around 50% at moderate T_a’s (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996; Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Ro and Williams, 2010). When T_a approaches or exceeds T_b, birds increase both cutaneous and respiratory water loss, but the latter to a greater extent (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996; Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Wojciechowski et al., 2021). With the exception of Columbiforms (McKechnie and Wolf, 2004), respiratory water loss is the main avenue of water loss when a bird is exposed to heat stress (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996; Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Wojciechowski et al., 2021). Birds experiencing high rates of TEWL may have difficulties to keep their body adequately hydrated while maintaining body temperature below critical hyperthermia (Webster, 1991). Thus, it becomes an obvious challenge, especially for diurnal birds, to reduce TEWL while preventing lethal hyperthermia (McKechnie and Wolf, 2010; Conradie et al., 2020). Tolerance of hyperthermia is the primary physiological mechanism allowing for water conservation in heat exposed birds (Calder and King, 1974; Weathers, 1981; McKechnie and Wolf, 2019). It has been shown that desert birds have a lower TEWL than species from mesic areas (Williams, 1996). CWL is reduced through a specific lipid composition of the skin’s stratum corneum, which makes it less permeable to endogenous water (Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Haugen, 2003; Haugen et al., 2003; Muñoz-Garcia and Williams, 2011; Champagne et al., 2012). A reduction of RWL in desert birds as a mechanism of water conservation has been discussed (Williams and Tieleman, 2005) and was observed in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) acclimated to limited water availability (Wojciechowski et al., 2021). However, in the Kalahari Desert, bird species relying on food as their only water source started panting at a higher temperature and have overall higher evaporative scope when compared with species that drink water (Smit et al., 2016; Czenze et al., 2020). The ambient temperature of panting onset potentially sets the time boundaries in which a bird can remain active during the day in a desert environment, while avoiding the excessive water loss induced by RWL for thermoregulation at higher T_a (Weathers, 1981; Smit et al., 2016; Pattinson et al., 2020).

Besides local desert specialists, many temperate-zone birds stage in the desert for a relatively short time during migration. In the European-African migration system, around 2.1 billion passerine and near-passerine birds cross the Sahara Desert during their autumn migration to reach their wintering grounds (Moreau, 1972; Hahn et al., 2009). These birds presumably did not evolve specific adaptations to the extremely arid climate conditions of the desert, yet most songbirds do not overfly the Sahara in one non-stop flight, but rather fly at night and stop over during the day (Biebach, 1985; Bairlein, 1988; Schmaljohann et al., 2007). Notably, many species avoid long stopovers in the desert and prolong their flights as much as possible (Adamík et al., 2016; Jiguet et al., 2019; Malmiga et al., 2021). Nonetheless, these trans-Saharan migrants are known to perform longer stopovers prior to the desert crossing during autumn (Yosef and Chernetsov, 2005). Specifically, many migrating birds stop in the Negev desert which is located at the northern edge of the Sahara Desert (Moreau, 1972; Yosef and Chernetsov, 2005). Despite being defined as an arid environment (Goldreich, 2012), the Negev is the last potential stopover area before the Sahara Desert crossing during autumn. Birds that stage at the desert edge are staging for longer periods, accumulating large amounts of fat to facilitate the cross-desert travel (Piersma, 1998; Schaub and Jenni, 2000; Wojciechowski et al., 2014). Observational studies showed that the behavior at desert stopover sites varies among species (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011; Arizaga et al., 2013; Hama et al., 2013; Maggini et al., 2015). These differences are likely associated with adaptations to arid habitats: while xerophilic species (e.g., many Mediterranean species) spend longer stopovers in the desert and effectively refuel, mesophilic species usually avoid long stopovers and spend rather short time on the ground resting in the shade (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011).

The difference in stopover patterns between xerophilic and mesophilic migratory species may result from differences in their ability to maintain water balance. Foraging behavior and fat accumulation of migratory Blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla, a mesophilic species) at a desert stopover site was influenced by water availability, while this was not the case in Lesser Whitethroats (Sylvia curruca, a xerophilic species) (Sapir et al., 2004; Tsurim et al., 2008). In addition, Lesser Whitethroats were able to accumulate energy stores in a similar fashion in a wide range of habitats, while in Blackcaps this was restricted to a habitat offering ideal feeding conditions, such as high amounts of lipid-rich fruits (Sapir et al., 2004; Domer et al., 2018).

In this study, we aimed at understanding the physiological mechanisms underlying the different behavior of birds at desert stopovers in relation to water availability and their ability to maintain water balance. We hypothesized that trans-Saharan migratory songbird species adjust their stopover behavior in the desert to minimize the risk of dehydration. We assumed that species better adapted to arid conditions face lower risk of dehydration. In particular, we predicted that species actively refueling at a stopover in the Negev have a lower surface-specific CWL and express a higher temperature threshold for panting onset than species which spend their stopover resting in the shade. We also predicted that an experimental manipulation of water availability leads to a change in foraging behavior, especially in species with low refueling rates, inducing an increase in refueling when water was available. To test these predictions, we quantified foraging and drinking behavior, CWL, and temperature of panting onset in Blackcaps and Lesser Whitethroats, taking advantage of the previous knowledge of their different stopover strategies during autumn migration in Israel (Sapir et al., 2004; Tsurim et al., 2008). We also measured CWL and panting onset in the Willow Warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus). This species is regularly observed to actively forage at desert stopover sites in spring (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011; Maggini et al., 2015). If indeed differences in thermoregulatory CWL underlie differences in stopover behavior among species, Blackcaps should have a higher CWL and a lower temperature of panting onset than the other two species. The augmented availability of drinking water should increase foraging activity in all species, but more so in Blackcaps.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

We collected data during the autumns of 2017 and 2018 at two stopover sites in the Negev Desert, Israel (Figure 1). In 2017, our study site was Lake Yeruham (30°59′ N, 34°53′ E), a large artificial waterbody in the northern Negev. The vegetation was dominated by Phragmites australis, Tamarix aphylla, and Tamarix nilotica as well as Xanthium strumarium. At some distance from the lakeshore, the most common plant species were Acacia raddiana, Atriplex halimus, Morus sp., and P. australis. During autumn 2018 we collected data at Midreshet Ben-Gurion (30°51′ N, 34°46′ E), approximately 19 km south of the 2017 site. This site includes an experimental mixed Pistacia tree plantation (1.7 ha) which is populated mainly with two species, Pistacia lentiscus and Pistacia chinensis, in addition to Acacia saligna and A. halimus.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. The location of the two field sites in Israel. The study was conducted at Lake Yeruham in 2017, and at Midreshet Ben-Gurion in 2018.

Study Species

We studied Blackcaps, Lesser Whitethroats and Willow Warblers. These three species differ in body mass and size (Shirihai and Svensson, 2018; own data in Table 1) and have similar breeding origins (Yosef Kiat, Israeli Bird Ringing Center, unpubl. data). Blackcaps and Willow Warblers winter mainly in forested areas, although they are both highly flexible in their habitat selection (Snow et al., 1997; Shirihai et al., 2001; Sapir et al., 2004; Baker, 2010). Even though both species use similar habitats, they have different refueling strategies: migratory Blackcaps rely mainly on pre-departure fattening rather than refueling in desert oases especially during autumn migration (Izhaki and Maitav, 1998; Sapir et al., 2004; Tsurim et al., 2008; Wojciechowski et al., 2014), and Willow Warblers spend more time foraging en route and carry relatively low fuel loads (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011; Haran and Izhaki, 2013; Maggini et al., 2015). The preferred winter habitats of Lesser Whitethroats are savannas with scattered trees or thornbush savanna (Snow et al., 1997; Shirihai et al., 2001; Sapir et al., 2004). The refueling strategy of Lesser Whitethroats is not thoroughly studied, but they show positive refueling rates in the region of our study (Sapir et al., 2004).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean body mass and wing length (mean ± 1 SD) of the three species measured in this study.

Field CWL Measurements

To quantify differences in evaporative water loss among bird species we conducted CWL measurements at Midreshet Ben-Gurion during autumn 2018. Birds were captured using mist nets. Captures started at 5:30 AM and were stopped when ambient temperature exceeded 30°C. Captured birds were marked with aluminum leg ring, after which the length of the folded wing and body mass were measured using international standards (Bairlein, 1995). Then, the birds were kept in a cotton bag in a shaded location until CWL measurements were taken. At the beginning of each measurement, we recorded time, air temperature, and air humidity using a mobile digital thermo-hygrometer (NeKan EU). Relative humidity (RH, in %) was transformed to absolute humidity (AH, in g H₂0 m^–3) using the formula AH = C × P_w/T, where C is a constant of 2.16679 (gK J^–1), P_w is the partial pressure of water vapor in Pa, and T is the temperature in K. We calculated P_w as P_ws (saturation water vapor pressure in hPa) × RH. P_ws was obtained using the formula P_ws = A × 10 ^ [m × T/(T + T_n)], where A, m and T_n are constants (respectively, 6.1164341, 7.591386, and 240.7263 for temperatures between −20°C and +50°C), and T was the temperature in °C.

The measurement was made by an experimenter who exposed at least 50 mm² of the lateral body apterium under the bird’s left wing, while wearing latex gloves to avoid moistening of the bird’s skin by human sweat. Then, five subsequent measurements of surface-specific CWL were taken using a factory-calibrated VapoMeter^TM (Delfin Technologies, Ltd., Kuopio, Finland, hereafter: vapometer; du Plessis et al., 2013). We used the small adapter of the vapometer, which covers 16 mm² of skin (Muñoz-Garcia and Williams, 2007; Muñoz-Garcia et al., 2012), and each measurement took about 20–30 s. The whole procedure lasted between 7 and 10 min, and immediately afterward the birds were released at the site of capture. Visual fat score (Kaiser, 1993) was assessed after the vapometer measurement to avoid blowing moist air onto the bird’s skin.

Temperature of Panting Onset

This part of the study was conducted at Lake Yeruham during autumn 2017. Birds were captured using mist nets from 5:30 AM until at least five individuals of the study species were caught. Captured birds were marked and measured as described above.

We used a flow-through respirometry protocol to measure the temperature of panting onset. A bird was placed into a two-compartment respirometry chamber (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996) with which we intended to measure CWL and RWL separately. The upper section of the chamber (head) was 8.75 l and the lower section (body) was 11.25 l. Due to persistent baselining problems, we failed to measure the absolute values for evaporative water loss and O₂ consumption. However, the output allowed us to record the temperature of panting onset using the sliding heating protocol (see below). For this analysis we used data from the upper section of the chamber (head compartment).

We performed the measurements using a sliding heating protocol. The respirometry chamber with the bird was placed inside a temperature-controlled box (35 l MobiCool G35). We started the measurement with the flow rate through the chamber set to 3.3 l min^–1 for 15 min to enable a quick washout of the humidity accumulated in the chamber during the positioning of the bird. After the washout period, we decreased the flow to 0.66 l min^–1 and started the heating of the chamber. Temperature in the temperature-controlled box was monitored continuously by a custom-made temperature logger (precision: ±0.1°C) attached inside the respirometry chamber. The starting temperature of the measurements was 31.0 ± 3.4°C and progressively increased during the procedure at a rate of ∼0.3°C min^–1. We continued the measurement for at least 5 min after noticing a sharp increase in excurrent air humidity in the upper chamber, which was a clear indication of the onset of panting. On average, the measurement of one bird took one hour and the average temperature at the end of the experiment was 39.3 ± 1.6°C. The bird was immediately released at the end of the trial, after being provided with water. We did not perform visual observations of bird behavior during these measurements.

Behavioral Responses to Changes in Water Availability

We experimentally examined the effect of water availability on the foraging and drinking behavior of staging birds at Midreshet Ben-Gurion in 2018. We manipulated water availability at the same study site in which bird captures with mist netting took place (see CWL measurements). We created five drinking puddles of water using plastic sheets and fresh tap water. The puddles were placed in the shadow of large bushes 6–12 m from the closest mist net, with the exception of one puddle which was directly below a net. The plastic sheets were covered with soil before the puddles were filled to achieve a more natural setting. The puddles were filled and emptied alternately in a 5-day rhythm. The water regime change was always conducted at 10 PM. In total, water was provided on 13 days (two full 5-day periods and one truncated period at the end of the season), while the puddles were dry on 11 days (two full 5-day periods and one day before the start of the experiment). One additional artificial water body (150 × 70 cm) was present at the site. It was built of concrete and had vertical walls. This reservoir was most likely not a suitable drinking place for birds, and none were ever observed to use it for drinking or bathing. However, we covered it with wire mesh (0.5 cm mesh size) when the experimental ponds were dry and uncovered when water was provided at the experimental puddles.

We searched for Blackcaps and Lesser Whitethroats along a transect in the plantation. One observer walked the transect each day at 09:00, 11:00, 13:00, and 17:00 between September 5 and September 29 (excluding September 10 and September 16). The transect was approximately 1090 m long and its coverage took 45 min. The observer scanned vegetational structures (bushes and trees) along a defined path for at least 2 min during each round. When a bird was encountered, we classified its behavior in one of the following four categories: (1) moving, (2) foraging, (3) resting, and (4) grooming. We observed each individual for 30–300 s and assigned a single behavior to each bird. When more than one behavior was expressed, we chose the behavior that lasted longer during the observation. Moving was defined as occasions when the bird was jumping or flying around. If during the movement the bird was seen pecking or eating at least once during the observation, we classified its behavior as foraging, because we assumed that movement could be related to food-searching. Resting was defined as cases when the bird just perched on a branch without undertaking any other activity. Grooming was defined as the bird taking care of its plumage during the observation time. It never occurred that a bird was foraging and resting/grooming during one observation sequence.

In addition to these observations, we set trail cameras (Cuddeback Long Range IR) at 80–130 cm distance from the edge of each artificial puddle. The cameras were attached to sticks 15–20 cm above the ground. They were set to take a picture and start a video recording for 30 s following every movement trigger and were active throughout the study period (including when the puddles were dry). We analyzed all pictures and videos and recorded all bird species present and the duration of their visit. Time and date were also recorded.

Data Analysis

Field CWL Measurements

In a first step of the analysis, we explored the factors that explained variation in CWL. We used a linear mixed-effects model with the surface-specific CWL (g m^–2 h^–1, measured with the vapometer) as a dependent variable. We used the average of the three lowest vapometer measurements as the response variable because the measured values decreased gradually from the first to the fifth measurement, reaching a plateau between the third and fifth. Since ambient temperature as well as air humidity influence CWL (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996; Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Gerson et al., 2014; Champagne et al., 2016), we included them as independent variables in the analysis, together with water in the puddles (no/yes), ordinal date, waiting time in the bag (CWL measurement time - extraction time from the net), and size-corrected body mass. Size-corrected body mass was calculated as: [(body mass/length of the folded wing) × (length of the folded wing)]. We used species as a random intercept to be able to detect within-species variation in CWL in relation to body mass. We eliminated non-significant predictor variables in a stepwise backward procedure, checking after every step that model deviance was not affected (Zuur et al., 2009). We examined all combinations of predictor variables used in the models for multicollinearity using scatterplot matrices and correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r). All calculated |r| - values were below 0.7, which is considered to be a suitable indicator value above which multicollinearity severely distorts model estimations (Dormann et al., 2013). The model was tested for major violations of model assumptions by evaluating diagnostic plots (Zuur et al., 2009). After identifying the most influential parameter (which was T_a, see section “Results”), we tested for interspecific differences using ANCOVA, with surface-specific CWL as a dependent variable, T_a as a continuous independent variable, species as a categorical independent factor, and the species × T_a interaction. The assumptions for ANCOVA were checked and met.

To determine the variability in total CWL in the three species, we modeled the slopes and intercepts for each species as obtained from the ANCOVA model. We obtained hourly ambient temperature data from the Israel Meteorology Service station located in Kibbutz Sde-Boker, approximately 3 km north-east of the Midreshet Ben-Gurion site. In both years September temperatures ranged between 14.0 and 36.5°C, which overlaps with the range of temperatures at which bird CWL was measured. Using the equations describing the relationship between CWL and T_a, we calculated changes in total CWL (g H₂O h^–1). Body surface area was calculated as As (cm²) = 10 body mass (g)^0.667 (Walsberg and King, 1978). To simplify the approach, we assumed that CWL changes during the day only in relation to changes in T_a. We do realize that this approach is very simplistic, yet it provides information on the ecologically relevant species differences in CWL. Daily CWL was obtained by integrating the total CWL over a given day. Finally, we simulated changes in CWL using ambient temperature for days in September 2017 and 2018. Integrated total CWL was compared between species using a repeated ANOVA on ranks. We then compared CWL as a percentage of total body mass lost during the day in the three study species.

Temperature of Panting Onset

We used the absolute humidity values from the upper chamber as a proxy for RWL. We matched the temperature measurements in the temperature-controlled box with the humidity measurements from the upper chamber such that our dataset included data for every minute. We excluded the first 25 min (15 min washout + 10 min equilibrium establishment) from the analysis. We used breakpoint analysis to identify the temperature at which a sharp increase in chamber humidity, an indication of panting, took place. We determined the breakpoint in the curve between the 26th minute of the measurement procedure and its end using the “segmented” function provided by the “segmented” package in R (Muggeo, 2009) and used this breakpoint as the temperature of panting onset for every individual. Sometimes the linear increase in RWL after the onset of panting became exponential toward the end of the measurements. We removed such points prior to the calculation of the segmented regression due to their high leverage on the estimate. Birds failing to show a clear breakpoint were not included in the analysis (12 out of 88; 3 blackcaps, 4 lesser whitethroats, and 5 willow warblers). We compared the temperatures of panting onset between species using a one-way ANOVA after we ascertained that the normality assumption was met, as was the homogeneity of variances between the samples (Levene’s Test from medians: F₂,₇₃ = 0.473, p = 0.625). We used a Tukey HSD post hoc test to examine species-specific differences at a 95% confidence level.

Behavioral Responses to Changes in Water Availability

The probability of finding moving or foraging birds is consistently higher than for resting birds. To deal with this bias, we analyzed the relationship between daily captured and observed individuals in Blackcaps and Lesser Whitethroats. We ran a generalized linear model (GLM) with a Poisson error family, with the number of birds observed as a dependent variable, and the number of birds captured and the species as independent variables. The model fit was checked by visually inspecting diagnostic plots (Faraway, 2016). We cannot exclude that we observed some individuals multiple times, but we considered these observations as independent since we were not able to differentiate among individuals.

All analyses were performed with R 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020) within the RStudio IDE (version 1.4.1717).

Results

Field CWL Measurements

We obtained 360 CWL measurements from the three study species (Blackcap: n = 165, Lesser Whitethroat: n = 89, Willow Warbler: n = 108). The results of the mixed-effects model are shown in Table 2. The variables retained in the model were T_a, AH, date, water in the puddles, and size-corrected body mass. The effect sizes of AH and date were small and were considered irrelevant, and in addition, the low t-value (<2) for AH indicated that this effect was not significant. T_a had a positive effect on surface-specific CWL, while the availability of water and size-corrected body mass were negatively correlated to surface-specific CWL (Table 2 and Figure 2). The ANCOVA confirmed the positive effect of T_a on surface-specific CWL (Table 3). There were also significant differences between species, with Blackcaps having higher surface-specific CWL than Lesser Whitethroats and Willow Warblers (Table 3). This was mostly due to higher values at low temperatures, as confirmed by the significant difference in the slope of surface-specific CWL in relation to T_a (Table 3 and Figure 3).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Results of a linear mixed-effects model with surface-specific CWL as dependent variable.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Relationship between body mass and surface-specific CWL in the three study species. In all three species, there is a negative relationship between body mass and CWL.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Results of the ANCOVA with surface-specific CWL as a dependent variable.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Relationship between T_a and surface-specific CWL in the three study species. Blackcaps (green) had significantly higher overall CWL than the other two species, as a result of higher values at low T_a.

Daily absolute CWL simulated by our model equaled: 2.025 ± 0.085 g H₂O day^–1 in Blackcaps, 1.520 ± 0.083 g H₂O day^–1 in Lesser Whitethroats, and 1.230 ± 0.072 g H₂O day^–1 in Willow Warblers. Expressed as a percentage of body mass, Blackcaps would lose 11.31 ± 0.47%, Lesser Whitethroats 11.96 ± 0.65%, and Willow Warblers 13.71 ± 0.80% of body mass daily by cutaneous evaporation only (Figure 4). These differences among species were statistically significant (rm ANOVA on ranks, χ² = 120, df = 2, p < 0.001).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Daily CWL of the three study species as simulated from our empirical data. Each point represents a single day in September 2017 (red dots) and 2018 (gray dots). The values are given as percentage of body mass (taking the average body mass for each species as estimated in this project, Table 1). Different letters indicate significant difference between medians (Tukey test: p < 0.001).

Temperature of Panting Onset

We estimated the temperature of panting onset of 76 birds (Blackcap: n = 30, Lesser Whitethroat: n = 25, Willow Warbler: n = 21). It differed significantly between the three study species (one-way ANOVA: F₂,₇₃ = 5.137, p = 0.008, Figure 5). Blackcaps started panting at a lower temperature (mean ± 1 SD: 36.5°C ± 1.6°C) than Lesser Whitethroats (37.6°C ± 1.5°C; Tukey HSD post hoc Test: adj. p = 0.048) and Willow Warblers (37.9°C ± 1.8°C; Tukey HSD post hoc Test: adj. p = 0.020). Lesser Whitethroats and Willow Warblers did not differ in their temperature of panting onset (adj. p = 0.804).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Temperature of panting onset in the three study species. Species marked with the same letters (a, b) were not significantly different. Willow Warbler (orange): n = 21; Blackcap (green): n = 30; Lesser Whitethroat (blue): n = 25.

Behavioral Responses to Water

During autumn 2018 we captured 181 Blackcaps, 89 Lesser Whitethroats and 133 Willow Warblers. During 90 transects (45 min each, totaling 67.5 h) we observed 26 Blackcaps and 83 Lesser Whitethroats. The number of birds observed increased on average by 0.12 ± 0.04 with every captured bird (GLM: z = 3.02, p = 0.003), and the slope of the increase was not different between species (GLM, interaction term species × birds captured: estimate = 0.01 ± 0.06, z = 0.14, p = 0.888). Significantly more Lesser Whitethroats were observed along the transects than Blackcaps (GLM, main effect of species: estimate = 1.69 ± 0.51, z = 3.29, p = 0.001).

Most birds were observed moving or foraging in the vegetation (Blackcap: 92.6%; Lesser Whitethroat: 95.1%). The remaining birds were resting (Figure 6). The proportion of foraging and moving birds did not differ significantly between days with water availability and days with no water (Chi-square test: χ² = 0.050, df = 1, p = 0.822). Comfort behavior and resting were excluded from the test due to small sample sizes or lack thereof.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Behavior of Blackcaps and Lesser Whitethroats at Midreshet Ben-Gurion in September 2018. Behavioral observations were not performed on Willow Warblers. Blackcap: n = 26; Lesser Whitethroat: n = 83. In Lesser Whitethroats, values for resting and grooming behavior were 3.6 and 1.2%, respectively.

In 2018 we recorded 143 individuals from 13 bird species at the artificial puddles. The most abundant were resident bird species, while only a few migratory birds occurred at the ponds for drinking. Of our focal species, four Blackcaps, nine Lesser Whitethroats and four Willow Warblers were observed at the puddles. Mean duration of stay at the puddle did not differ among the three species (one-way ANOVA: F₂,₁₃ = 0.342, p = 0.717, Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Number of birds recorded and mean duration of stay (±SD, only for species with N > 3) at the artificial puddles during the study in 2018.

Discussion

We found partial support to our prediction that our three study species would have different adaptations to arid conditions. Blackcaps had slightly higher surface-specific CWL than Lesser Whitethroats and Willow Warblers, but this difference was mostly due to higher CWL at T_a’s well below T_b. When extrapolated over the whole body surface, the species with the highest overall CWL were also the ones showing higher activity levels, which is against our expectations. However, as predicted, the onset of panting occurred at lower T_a in Blackcaps compared to the other two species. The availability of water did not seem to influence the birds’ activity. Taken together, these results do not support the hypothesis that the activity of birds at a stopover site would be associated with the risk of dehydration. However, physiological constraints related to water can help explain the birds’ behavior.

The measured maximum CWL ranged between 34 and 36 mg H₂O cm^–2 day^–1, and were within the range of 12 temperate zone passerine bird species (21.8–35.8 mg H₂O cm^–2 day^–1) measured in dry conditions (Ro and Williams, 2010). Our simulated data show that this represents a daily CWL of 11–13% of the total body mass of the focal species. Though we have no data on RWL, we can assume that this would have similar values, because in passerines, at T_a’s below the panting threshold, there is an approximate 50:50 ratio of CWL and RWL (Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Muñoz-Garcia and Williams, 2005). Therefore, assuming that a bird would sit completely still in a shaded area during a whole day, its TEWL would be in the range of 20–26% of body mass, depending on the species. This by far exceeds the 11% dehydration threshold for the maintenance of coordination in small passerines (Wolf and Walsberg, 1996). In the bird species measured so far, total body water in healthy individuals is about 60–65% of body mass (Hughes et al., 1987; Ellis and Jehl, 1991; Speakman, 1997). Our predicted water loss is therefore in the range of 31–43% of the total body water. This implies that birds must replenish their water reserves to avoid death by dehydration. Foraging activity might expose the animals to higher T_a and, possibly, direct sunlight. This, together with an increase in metabolic heat production due to muscular work would sharpen the need for evaporative cooling and result in even higher water loss.

While part of the lost body water might be produced metabolically (Morrison, 1953), the main avenue for obtaining additional water for most bird species is food, especially when no drinking water is available. Some species are even known not to drink when surface water is available (Smit et al., 2016; Czenze et al., 2020), and for these species it is imperative to obtain their water through foraging. Despite the percentage of active birds observed was similar for Lesser Whitethroats and Blackcaps, the proportion of observed to trapped birds was much higher for Lesser Whitethroats. This suggests that inactive Blackcaps were likely underrepresented in our observation study, because of lower detectability. This suggests that, overall, Lesser Whitethroats are more active than Blackcaps, which can be associated with the higher percentage of body water that they lose through CWL. Unfortunately, we have no data on the activity of Willow Warblers, but previous studies conducted in the Sahara Desert showed that they are also actively foraging during stopovers (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011; Maggini et al., 2015). Intriguingly, these differences do not seem to have arisen by different adaptations of the skin membranes among species (as shown e.g., in larks and sparrows, Tieleman and Williams, 2002; Muñoz-Garcia et al., 2012), since the surface-specific rate of CWL was fairly comparable among species. It is possible that a difference would be observable during spring migration, since Blackcaps spend the winter in more mesic habitats than Lesser Whitethroats (Snow et al., 1997; Shirihai et al., 2001) and their skin membranes might be accordingly flexibly adjusted to the arid conditions at the wintering grounds (Muñoz-Garcia et al., 2008). The higher percentage of water loss in the Willow Warbler could be an indication of higher evaporative cooling efficiency (the rate of heat loss over heat production). As a result, this species may afford higher activity and exposure to higher T_a, provided that the amount of water lost does not exceed a threshold above which dehydration would pose a death threat (Albright et al., 2017; Conradie et al., 2020).

The main behavioral and physiological indication of the risk of dehydration at high ambient temperatures is the onset of panting (Pattinson et al., 2020). The results of this study confirmed the prediction that Blackcaps have a lower temperature of panting onset than Willow Warblers and Lesser Whitethroats. The mean values we measured in the three species (Blackcap: 36.5°C, Lesser Whitethroat: 37.6°C, Willow Warbler: 37.9°C) were in the range of temperatures (31.3°C–46°C, mean: 39.3°C) at which 50% of the individuals from 33 different Kalahari Desert bird species were observed to begin panting (Smit et al., 2016). This result provides a promising avenue to explain the evolution of the different use of stopover sites in migratory species. It also indicates that behavioral characteristics of response to heat could be relevant for sites outside the desert as well. It has to be noted that larger species usually initiate heat dissipation behaviors (e.g., panting and wing drooping) at lower temperatures than smaller species due to their smaller surface to volume-ratio (Weathers, 1981; Smit et al., 2016; Pattinson et al., 2020). This could be an explanation for the observation in our study. In addition, different adaptations to optimize heat loss in arid conditions, such as the ability to tolerate high body temperatures during facultative hyperthermia (Tieleman and Williams, 1999; Smit et al., 2013, 2016; Nilsson et al., 2016), the dependence on wing-drooping as alternative heat dissipation behavior (Smit et al., 2016; Wojciechowski et al., 2021) or the reduction of metabolic rate (Williams and Tieleman, 2005; Wojciechowski et al., 2021) may also influence the temperature of panting onset. These factors clearly indicate new avenues for further research investigating the response of different species to dehydrating conditions.

Interestingly, surface-specific CWL was negatively correlated with body mass in all three species studied. Since body mass is largely affected by fat stores in migratory birds, this provides an indication that subcutaneous fat may be directly or indirectly related to cutaneous evaporation. However, the mechanistic processes involved are still unknown yet. Surface-specific CWL values were also lower when water was available in the puddles. This difference was relatively small (∼0.5 g m^–2 h^–1) but statistically significant. This may suggest that birds with slightly lower CWL were more likely to be captured on days where water was available. This is somewhat counterintuitive, because we would have expected birds with higher water losses to be more motivated to replenish their water content by drinking or foraging more actively. A possible explanation might include a combination of the effects of body condition (heavier birds – the ones with lower CWL – could be the ones that are more active when water is available) and diet. Birds that consume drier food are more affected by the lack of water (Mizrahy et al., 2011). These birds might be taking advantage of the availability of surface water.

Our study integrates physiological and behavioral data for better explaining differences in stopover ecology among three migratory species that were about to cross a wide ecological barrier, the Sahara Desert, on their way from the temperate breeding areas to their sub-Saharan over-wintering grounds. Our comparison between captured and observed birds showed that Lesser Whitethroats are observed far more often than Blackcaps at the study site, despite the lower number of captures. This confirms that Blackcaps spend more time resting in deep foliage than Lesser Whitethroats at this autumn stopover site in Israel. Despite simulating Sapir et al.’s (2004) study closely, our data do not suggest that the availability of drinking water would affect the behavior of Blackcaps by inducing increased foraging as they were only observed drinking at the artificial puddles rarely, and proportionally less than Lesser Whitethroats. However, Midreshet Ben-Gurion was recently found to act as an unordinary stopover site. While many passerines during autumn migration are attracted to it, most of them abandon it during their first morning (Domer et al., 2018). Given this information, the behavioral part of this study should be treated accordingly, as birds will actively forage only a few days after landing once they fully restored their digestive capacity (Gannes, 2002; McWilliams and Karasov, 2005).

The results of this study suggest that evaporative water loss provides an important physiological background that might have played a crucial role in the evolution of different desert-crossing strategies in small trans-Saharan migrants. While some species rely on en route refueling to cross the Sahara, others gain the necessary amounts of fat prior to the desert crossing (Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2011; Arizaga et al., 2013; Hama et al., 2013). Both strategies are successful and enable billions of birds to cross this large ecological barrier twice a year (Moreau, 1972; Hahn et al., 2009). However, the populations of many migratory bird species of the Old World are declining, and especially trans-Saharan migrants do so to a greater extent than resident or short-distance migrants (Vickery et al., 2014). Climate change leads to more arid conditions for the whole African continent (Nicholson et al., 2018), potentially imposing constraints on birds that use both refueling strategies before, during and after crossing the desert. While species which rely on pre-departure fattening might be confronted with the energetic challenge of carrying even higher fat loads in order to be able to cross an enlarged desert barrier, species which refuel en route might experience more difficulties to find suitable oases for efficient fat accumulation.

This study provides a first step toward identifying potential physiological mechanisms that constrain the birds’ behavior during a challenging phase of their migration. However, many open questions on the physiological mechanisms involved in the evolution of different refueling strategies and their species-specific consequences for the entire migration process remain to be addressed. We argue that explaining the behavior of migratory birds through physiological adaptations should be addressed through a mechanistic approach by applying comparative and experimental studies.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://phaidra.vetmeduni.ac.at/o:669.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Israel Nature and National Parks Authority.

Author Contributions

IM, ES, and NS conceived the study. BP, BW, DB, and YZ performed fieldwork. BP, BW, MW, and IM performed data analysis. BP, BW, AD, MW, and IM wrote the manuscript. YZ, ES, and NS provided logistical support. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a start-up grant (Profillinien) of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna to IM. The University of Vienna supported BP with a Grant Abroad (KWA) as well as a Needs-based Scholarship (Förderstipendium), and BW with a Needs-based Scholarship (Förderstipendium). NS was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant 702/17), and MW was supported by the Polish National Science Centre (Grant 2017/25/B/NZ8/00541).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ofer Ovadia for allowing us to work at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. We also thank Finja Strehmann, Sarah Degenhart, and Ron Efrat for their help during fieldwork. Benjamin Seaman proofread a previous version of the manuscript. Yosef Kiat from the Israeli Bird Ringing Center (IBRC), Israel Ornithological Center of the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel provided unpublished data of ring recoveries, the Israel Meteorology Service provided data used in this work, and Christian Schulze provided the camera traps.

References

Abáigar, T., Cano, M., and Ensenyat, C. (2018). Time allocation and patterns of activity of the dorcas gazelle (Gazella dorcas) in a sahelian habitat. Mamm. Res. 63, 73–82. doi: 10.1007/s13364-017-0334-0