Xianjian Liu1
Jifu Ma
Caiqing Qin
Kaibo Wang
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Key Laboratory for Applied Ecology of Loess Plateau, School of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
- 2Research and Development Centre of Ecological and Sustainable Application of Microbial Industry of the Loess Plateau in Shaanxi Province, Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
- 3Engineering Research Center of Microbial Resources Development and Green Recycling, University of Shaanxi Province, Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
- 4Department of Earth and Environmental Science, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- 5State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Effects and challenges of ecological protection and restoration strategies on elemental cycles
Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur, as the most biologically active and abundant elements, play crucial roles in terrestrial ecosystems and are key factors in plant growth and productivity (Rey Benayas et al., 2009). However, their biogeochemical cycles have been considerably impacted by intensive human activities and climate change, including global warming, the Grain for Green Program, wetland and farmland restoration, and the reuse of saline–alkali farmland (Zong et al., 2025). In response to biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, ecological restoration has become a global priority, with projects steadily increasing over recent decades. However, these efforts are not a cure-all for ecosystem recovery (Marchand et al., 2021). Notably, the effectiveness of restoration measures remains uncertain, and their impact on elemental cycles remains unclear (Li et al., 2019). Given the critical role of these elements in terrestrial ecosystems, understanding how ecological restoration affects biogeochemical cycles is essential.
The migration, transformation, and accumulation of heavy metals are also associated with intensive human activities and changes in ecosystems (Shi et al., 2022). The occurrence of heavy metals in the environment is of great concern due to their high bioaccumulation and toxicity, which can have various acute and chronic adverse effects when humans are excessively exposed to contaminated media (Zamora-Ledezma et al., 2021). Human activities have been identified as the primary source of the spreading and increasing quantities of heavy metals found in soil, sediments, and aquatic environments (Carolin et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2022). However, there are limited studies that have quantitatively investigated the effects of ecological projects and restoration strategies on the concentration of heavy metals in the process of restoring and protecting the ecological environment. Particularly, more efforts are needed to quantify the interactions between human factors (e.g., transportation programs, land use changes, and dam construction) and landscape patterns, as well as how they impact the geochemical behaviors of elements (Huang et al., 2021; Vareda et al., 2019). This would aid conservation and sustainable utilization activities to achieve greater ecological benefits. Therefore, we organized this Research Topic to better understand the positive or negative impacts of human restoration activities on elemental cycles within improving ecosystems.
Farming activities are among the major processes shaping agro-ecosystems. These activities often differ in severity, scale, and frequency, leading to changes in soil quality and carbon and nitrogen cycles that deviate from natural variability (Viaud et al., 2018). Understanding how soil function changes in response to these disturbances is critical for predicting the varying states of agricultural production and the many services they provide. The application of agro-geotextiles and the adoption of conservation tillage are useful measures to decrease soil erosion, increase soil carbon sequestration, and enhance crop production. Roy et al. found the soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation rate of up to 0.5 Mg·ha−1 yr−1 and a reduced soil loss rate from 10.39 to 3.75 Mg·ha−1 yr−1 upon implementing A. donax mats and incorporating a legume into the cropping system in the Indian Himalayas. A different technique was adopted by Wang et al., who explored applying cement as a binding material in conjunction with other organic matters and habitat amendment materials to improve the quality of Yellow River sediments. These restoration efforts significantly increased the fertility quality and planting performance of the sediments. These results suggest that human amendment activities can have a positive influence on carbon sequestration, soil quality, and crop production.
Salinization-related crop production losses ranged from 18% to 43% in arid and semi-arid regions, making soil salinization management a crucial Research Topic for agricultural sustainability (Singh, 2021). However, its impact on carbon and nitrogen transformation remains poorly understood due to the complexity of salinization processes. A comprehensive meta-analysis by Tao et al. found that pH, total N, soil organic carbon, and C/N ratio strongly influence net N mineralization and nitrification rates, highlighting the need to consider salinity levels when optimizing nitrogen fertilization in saline drylands. One effective management strategy is applying soil amendments. Tian et al. demonstrated that desulfurized gypsum combined with organic fertilization significantly improved soil nutrients and quality while reducing soil pH and exchange sodium percentage. Their findings emphasize that tillage practices are key to mitigating soil salinity and enhancing carbon and nitrogen cycling.
Heavy metals are naturally occurring elements that have natural and human sources. However, the latter is more significant, contributing to the release, migration, and accumulation of pollutants in a more toxic and mobile form (Carolin et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2022). For instance, dam construction disrupts the natural ecosystem of rivers and significantly influences the geochemical behavior of heavy metals. Xu et al. revealed that the Three Gorges Reservoir increased sediment adsorption effects and largely contributed to the migration of heavy metals from soil/sediment upstream to the dam. Changes in hydrological regimes, physiochemical characteristics, and vegetation coverage disrupt the natural distribution of heavy metals.
When comparing the difference in heavy metal concentration of surface water between the buffer and core zones of the Qinling Giant Panda Reserve, Zheng et al. found that the former had higher pollutant levels due to the pollution sources from traffic-related activities and metal mining. Human activities have significantly increased the accumulation of heavy metals in the earth surface ecosystems. Cadmium is one of the most harmful and toxic metals in soil ecosystems to plants and animals, and its local concentrations can be increased by several orders of magnitude under the influence of various human activities and geological features. Xu et al. conducted a study to examine the ecotoxicological effects of various cadmium concentrations on soil microorganisms and earthworms. Although high cadmium levels negatively impact earthworms biomass, low cadmium concentrations enhance microbial diversity. These studies provided evidence of how human activities impact elemental cycles in natural ecosystems and contribute to the spread of heavy metals.
In conclusion, the compiled papers demonstrated how intensive human activities have altered elemental cycles, posing new challenges for ecosystem restoration. While this Research Topic primarily highlights the effects of dam construction, farming, and transportation on heavy metals, carbon, nitrogen, and soil properties, it underscores the need for a comprehensive assessment of geochemical alterations under ecological protection. Hence, project objectives and short- and long-term environmental impacts should be carefully considered when evaluating ecological programs. This approach will help mitigate ecological risks and pave the way for effective restoration strategies.
Author contributions
XL: Writing – original draft, Investigation. JM: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis, Project administration, Funding acquisition. CQ: Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Validation. KW: Validation, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Shaanxi Provincial Key R&D Plan General Project (2023-YBNY-255) and Doctoral research initiation Project of Yan’an University (YDBK2022-80).
Acknowledgments
We deeply thank all the authors and reviewers who have participated in this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Carolin, C. F., Kumar, P. S., Saravanan, A., Joshiba, G. J., and Naushad, M. (2017). Efficient techniques for the removal of toxic heavy metals from aquatic environment: a review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5 (3), 2782–2799. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.029
Huang, S., Xiao, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., and Tang, L. (2021). Interactive effects of natural and anthropogenic factors on heterogenetic accumulations of heavy metals in surface soils through geodetector analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 789, 147937. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147937
Li, S., Xie, T., Pennings, S. C., Wang, Y., Craft, C., and Hu, M. (2019). A comparison of coastal habitat restoration projects in China and the United States. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 14388. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50930-6
Ma, J., Li, S. L., Chen, Y., Yue, F. J., Shaheen, S. M., Majrashi, A., et al. (2022). Hazardous toxic metal(loid)s in top- and deep-soils during the transformation of aquaculture ponds restored to farmland. Sci. Total Environ. 852, 158569. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158569
Marchand, L., Castagneyrol, B., Jiménez, J. J., Rey Benayas, J. M., Benot, M.-L., Martínez-Ruiz, C., et al. (2021). Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration. Ecol. Indic. 123, 107362. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362
Rey Benayas, J. M., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., and Bullock, J. M. (2009). Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325 (5944), 1121–1124. doi:10.1126/science.1172460
Shi, C., He, H., Xia, Z., Gan, H., Xue, Q., Cui, Z., et al. (2022). Heavy metals and Pb isotopes in a marine sediment core record environmental changes and anthropogenic activities in the Pearl River Delta over a century. Sci. Total Environ. 814, 151934. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151934
Singh, A. (2021). Soil salinization management for sustainable development: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 277, 111383. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111383
Vareda, J. P., Valente, A. J. M., and Duraes, L. (2019). Assessment of heavy metal pollution from anthropogenic activities and remediation strategies: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 246, 101–118. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.126
Viaud, V., Santillàn-Carvantes, P., Akkal-Corfini, N., Le Guillou, C., Prévost-Bouré, N. C., Ranjard, L., et al. (2018). Landscape-scale analysis of cropping system effects on soil quality in a context of crop-livestock farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 265, 166–177. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.018
Zamora-Ledezma, C., Negrete-Bolagay, D., Figueroa, F., Zamora-Ledezma, E., Ni, M., Alexis, F., et al. (2021). Heavy metal water pollution: a fresh look about hazards, novel and conventional remediation methods. Environ. Technol. Innov. 22, 101504. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101504
Keywords: human activities, heavy metals, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, soil salinization, ecological restoration
Citation: Liu X, Ma J, Qin C and Wang K (2025) Editorial: Effects and challenges of ecological protection and restoration strategies on elemental cycles. Front. Environ. Sci. 13:1596509. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1596509
Received: 19 March 2025; Accepted: 27 March 2025;
Published: 03 April 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Martin Siegert, University of Exeter, United KingdomCopyright © 2025 Liu, Ma, Qin and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jifu Ma, bWFqZkB5YXUuZWR1LmNu