Yitong Wang
Yongke Yuan
Xiao Qian
Yuanying Chi
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
A Corrigendum on
The impact of China’s digital economy industry development and its structural indicators on carbon emission intensity
by Wang Y, Yuan Y, Qian X and Chi Y (2024). Front. Environ. Sci. 12:1438927. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1438927
In the published article, there were translation errors in the Introduction and unclear explanation in the Method sections of the abstract.
A correction has been made to Introduction and Method, page 01. This sentence previously stated:
“Introduction: The development of the digital economy has a profound impact on industrial economics. The article starts from the perspective of industrial organization theory. The thesis aims to analyze the industrial development of the digital economy and its three structural variables: digital manufacturing industry, digital service industry, and the development of industrial digitization on carbon emission intensity.
Method: Based on the data of Input-output Tables with extended tables of 30 provinces, this paper analyzes the industrial development of digital economy and its three structural variables: digital manufacturing industry, digital service industry, and the development of industrial digitization on carbon emission intensity.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Introduction: The development of the digital economy has a profound impact on industrial economics. The paper conducted an analysis of how China’s digital economy and its structural indicators impact carbon emission intensity. The structural indicators comprise three dimensions: digital manufacturing industries, digital service industries, and industrial digitalization.
Method: This study drew on industrial organization theory and established economic models for empirical test. The paper adopted the measurement framework from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to assess digital economy development through the economic value-added of digital industries. The analysis utilized Input-Output Tables (including extended tables) from 30 Chinese provinces. For empirical modeling, fixed-effects models and Spatial Durbin Models (SDM) were systematically employed.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: digital economy, digital economy industry, carbon intensity, industrial organization theory, low-carbon development, input-output
Citation: Wang Y, Yuan Y, Qian X and Chi Y (2025) Corrigendum: The impact of China’s digital economy industry development and its structural indicators on carbon emission intensity. Front. Environ. Sci. 13:1578221. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1578221
Received: 17 February 2025; Accepted: 28 February 2025;
Published: 12 March 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Martin Siegert, University of Exeter, United KingdomCopyright © 2025 Wang, Yuan, Qian and Chi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yongke Yuan, eXlrQGJqdXQuZWR1LmNu