Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Ecosystem Restoration
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1522979
This article is part of the Research Topic New Frontiers in Forest Landscape Restoration View all 3 articles

Situating the 'human' in forest landscape restoration

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Mansourian.org, Crassier, Switzerland
  • 2 Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  • 3 Faculté des sciences de la société, Université de Genève, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 4 The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 5 Bioversity International (Italy), Fiumicino, Italy
  • 6 The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, United Kingdom
  • 7 University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana
  • 8 World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Globally, forest landscape restoration (FLR) is gaining ground, alongside other forms of restoration under the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. In most cases, projects and initiatives fail to consider human dimensions that influence the processes and outcomes of the restoration effort. These dimensions refer to how and why humans value natural resources; how humans want resources to be managed; and how humans affect or are affected by natural resources management decisions. Using the model of the forest transition curve that shows the trajectory from loss of forests to restored forests, we discuss how FLR intersects in different ways with this transition curve. We conclude that: 1) definitions and their implications are a fundamental challenge for FLR; 2) there is an intrinsic interdependence between people and forests that varies across spatial and temporal scales and that is mediated by institutions; 3) power differentials among stakeholders create imbalances in restoration; 4) conflicts around restoration result from differing interests, power and values. Equitable and durable restoration requires a much greater inclusion of human dimensions along all steps of the process.

    Keywords: social-ecological system, human dimensions, restoration, governance, Forest transition

    Received: 05 Nov 2024; Accepted: 26 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Mansourian, Djenontin, Elias, Oldekop, Derkyi, Kull and Pacheco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Stephanie Mansourian, Mansourian.org, Crassier, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.