Salwa Bajja
Hassan Radoine
Ali Celik
Francis Dakyaga
Sadeq Damrah- 1Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, UM6P, School of Architecture Planning and Design SAP+D, Ben Guerir, Morocco
- 2Istanbul Gelisim University, Department of Electronic Commerce and Management, Istanbul, Türkiye
- 3Department of Local Governance and City Management, SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa City, Ghana
- 4International Planning Studies, TU-Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
- 5Department of Mathematics and Physics, College of Engineering, Australian University—Kuwait, Safat, Kuwait
Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region possesses immense capacity for renewable energy generation. Despite the potential, most countries in the region are yet to fully embrace renewable energy. Non-renewable sources still dominate their energy mix. This study examines the interplay between urbanization, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality in the six Middle Eastern and North African countries from 1990 to 2021, using the mean group (MG), the mean group dynamic least squares (DOLSMG), the common correlated effect (CCE), augmented mean group (AMG) and the cross-section augmented ARDL (CS–ARDL). Accounting for urbanization, and economic growth, the findings of DOLSMG indicate that while renewable energy and manufacturing activities significantly contribute to environmental quality, urbanization and human capital development significantly contributes to environmental degradation. The CS-ARDL short-term and long run estimation result showed that manufacturing activities significantly contribute to environmental quality, When examined by country, it was found that there is a unidirectional causal relationship from economic growth, manufacturing value added, urbanization, human capital development to dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia. While there is a unidirectional causality from manufacturing value added to dioxide emissions in Jordan, and a unidirectional causality from urbanization to dioxide emissions in Tunisia.
1 Introduction
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region stands at a pivotal crossroads, where the imperative for sustainable development intersects with the potential for a renewable energy revolution (Damrah et al., 2022a; Damrah et al., 2022b; Jahanger et al., 2022; Sinha et al., 2022; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023b; Satrović et al., 2023). The region’s natural endowments position is an asset for renewable energy generation. This is a much needed transition considering the global urgency to mitigate climate change impacts (Doğan et al., 2022; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023a; Khalil et al., 2023). Like in most countries in the global South, rate of urbanization especially in the is increasing steadily creating serious obstacles for sustainable urban development (Rana, 2011; Chen et al., 2016). Urbanization that is ecologically driven has been attributed to a number of factors, including economic liberalization, the widespread of clean technologies, and novel methods to pollution control. The impacts of urbanization on the environment have grown to be a serious worry because of the high proportion of the world’s population that lives in bigger cities (Zhang et al., 2022; Bajja et al., 2023). Researchers and law-makers have acknowledged the need for sustainable urban development long-term policies to address energy related challenges especially in the era of rapid urbanization, alongside fluctuation of oil and gas production (Kabisch et al., 2022; Rasoulinezhad and Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022). MENA, a region rich in natural gas and petroleum reserves, has experienced fluctuations in its oil and gas reserves over the years (Hafner et al., 2023). The region exhibits potential for renewable energy generation but faces significant challenges due to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels and inefficient resource allocation (Satari Yuzbashkandi et al., 2023). Despite this resource abundance, many countries in the region heavily subsidize fuel, leading to inefficient resource allocation and hindering the adoption of clean technologies. The heavy reliance on gas and oil, along with energy-intensive industrial projects, has contributed to a significant carbon footprint in the region. Addressing these issues and promoting the adoption of clean energy sources is crucial for mitigating climate change and ensuring sustainable development, especially in regions that rely heavily on fossil fuels (Guo et al., 2023). But this also requires an understanding of the relationship between urbanization, renewable energy, and environmental quality towards developing effective sustainable development and climate change policies.
In light of this, some theories have attempted to explain the environmental impacts of urbanization, such as ecological modernization, urban environmental transition (Randolph and Storper, 2023). and compact city (Kain et al., 2022). However, empirical investigations have yielded mixed results, showing both positive and negative effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions (Bidone, 2022). Some studies suggest a positive correlation between urbanization and CO2 emissions, while others find negative or statistically insignificant relationships (Apergis et al., 2023). Urbanization-pollution relationship may vary depending on the given countries, data sample, and estimation technique used in the analysis (Effiong, 2018). Until now, research on the relationship between urbanization and pollution in Africa has been limited.
Yet, the transition remains sluggish as the dominance of non-renewable energy sources persists, raising critical questions about the region’s future trajectory in light of environmental sustainability. The necessity of this study arises from a pressing policy-level conundrum: how can MENA countries pivot to renewable energy while managing urbanization and human capital development to enhance environmental quality? (Snieška and Zykienė, 2014; Ghafar, 2020; Treiblmaier et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021; Guo and Liu, 2022; Li and Pang, 2022; Pazienza et al., 2022).
This research is timely and necessary, addressing the policy-level problem of reconciling the growth of human capital and manufacturing activities with environmentally sustainable urban development in the MENA region (Liu et al., 2020; Treiblmaier et al., 2020). The persistent reliance on non-renewable energy amidst the potential for renewable alternatives highlights a significant policy gap. This study provides a lens through which to view the interactions between energy consumption patterns, the expansion of human capital, and the manufacturing sector’s evolution within the urbanization process. By exploring these dynamics, it seeks to inform policies that could steer the region towards a more sustainable and resilient future (Alharthi et al., 2021; Jahanger et al., 2022; Khalil et al., 2023).
The selection of six MENA countries for this study is particularly pertinent, as they present a microcosm of the broader region’s challenges and opportunities. This choice of sample not only reflects the diverse stages of urbanization and industrialization but also the varying degrees of investment in human capital development and renewable energy infrastructure. The econometric analysis through MG, DOLSMG, CCE, AMG, and CS–ARDL models provides a robust framework for understanding these complex relationships over 3 decades, encompassing different economic cycles and policy shifts (Jahanger et al., 2022; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023a; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023b; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023c; Esmaeili et al., 2023).
Moreover, an aspect of policy and scholarly concern has been the role of human capital development in the context of environmentally driven urbanization (Jahanger et al., 2022). Human capital development, which consists of people’s knowledge, education, talents, and skills, is crucial in determining urbanization tendencies and their environmental effects (Šlaus and Jacobs, 2011). In light of this, this paper examines the interplay between urbanization, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality in six Middle Eastern and North African countries. It utilizes data from 49 African countries covering the period from 1990 to 2010 to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the potential relationship between urbanization and the environment. The analysis employs the STIRPAT model, which is a widely used analytical framework for assessing the driving forces behind anthropogenic environmental changes.
In addition to the STIRPAT model, the article of Baltagi and Li (2002) utilizes a semi-parametric panel fixed effects estimator to explore the urbanization-environment relationship, which is not known beforehand. This estimation technique is beneficial as it avoids biases arising from functional form misspecification and considers possible non-linearities and parameter heterogeneity. Instead of imposing a specific functional form from the start, this approach enables the data generating process to determine the true nature of the relationship between urbanization and pollution. This approach is expected to provide more accurate and nuanced insights into the complex dynamics between urbanization and environmental impacts in Africa.
Moreover, while the study is region-specific, the implications of its findings hold broader relevance. The MENA region is not unique in its struggle to balance economic development with environmental sustainability. Therefore, the insights gleaned could inform policies in other regions facing similar challenges, though with the caveat that policy applicability must consider regional specificities. Generalizability is a nuanced prospect, hinging on the commonalities between the MENA context and other geopolitical environments (Jahanger et al., 2022; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2023a; Satrović et al., 2023).
The novelty of this study lies in the analysis of an existing interplay where policy interventions could most effectively foster an environmentally driven influence. By delineating the short-term benefits and long-term detriments of manufacturing activities on environmental quality, the research underscores the need for a strategic policy intervention. It advocates for an integration of renewable energy policies with urban planning and education reform to foster a sustainable nexus of human capital and manufacturing prowess (Salvucci et al., 2019; Delponte and Schenone, 2020; Feruni et al., 2020; Baer et al., 2021; Fu and Ng, 2021). This study aims to examine the interplay between urbanization, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality in the six Middle Eastern and North African countries. In so doing, we draw data from 1990 to 2021, using the mean group (MG), the mean group dynamic least squares (DOLSMG), the common correlated effect (CCE), augmented mean group (AMG) and the cross-section augmented ARDL (CS–ARDL). This study is organized as follows. The next section 2 reviews the existing literature review and the hypotheses of the study. Section 3 introduces the data, materials and methods of the study. Section 4 presents and discusses the findings of the study. Finally, Section 5 concludes the paper and highlights the major policy recommendations.
2 Urbanization, renewable energy and environmental quality: a review
The pursuit of consistent economic growth and progress has led developing nations diverging from the goal of transitioning into low-carbon societies (as noted by Ali et al. (2019a)). While transition into low-carbon societies is imperative, the linkage between energy usage, environmental preservation, and economic development is of great importance and worth investigating. Effective control of these factors is crucial for the welfare of humanity, the promotion of sustainable development, and the establishment of sound policy direction (Temiz Dinç and Akdoğan, 2019). Insofar, studies abound on examining the interconnectivity of these variables and the potential effect of renewable energy (RE) on environmental sustainability (Nathaniel et al., 2020; Abbasi et al., 2022; Zhang and Umair, 2023). Previous studies have often used CO2 emissions as a proxy for environmental quality (e.g., Azizalrahman, 2019; Bekun et al., 2019; Gokmenoglu and Sadeghieh, 2019; Saint Akadiri et al., 2019), and more recently, ecological footprint (EF) has been adopted (Alola, 2019b; Hassan et al., 2019). While the use of CO2 emissions as a proxy has been criticized for not being comprehensive enough since it does not consider the individual impact on the environment. Therefore, EF has gained attention as a better proxy. Some studies analyzed the effect of both RE and non-renewable energy (non-RE) on EF and consistently found that RE consumption reduces EF, promoting environmental quality (Nathaniel et al., 2020; Rafique et al., 2022). Conversely, non-RE is associated with environmental degradation, emphasizing the need to promote and use clean energy sources for sustainable development (e.g., Bello et al., 2018; Destek et al., 2018; Ozcan et al., 2018; Baloch et al., 2019a; Destek and Okumus, 2019; Dogan et al., 2019).
In the MENA region, Saidi et al. (2018) delved into the interplay between institutional quality, renewable energy (RE), and economic growth. They determined that RE and all aspects of institutional quality foster economic growth, except for bureaucratic factors. In a similar vein, Abdouli and Hammami (2017) scrutinized the connection between non-renewable energy (non-RE) and economic growth across 17 MENA countries spanning from 1990 to 2012. Their findings reveal a positive association between energy consumption and economic growth. Charfeddine and Kahia. (2019) conducted an investigation on the impact of RE consumption on CO2 emissions within the MENA region, covering the years 1980–2015, using the panel VAR technique. Their results suggest that RE has limited influence on CO2 emissions. Within the same region, non-RE sources are significant contributor to environmental degradation (Gorus and Aslan, 2019; Yang et al., 2021) Jin and Kim (2018) explored the determinants of CO2 emissions in 30 countries during the period of 1990–2014, highlighting that nuclear energy, unlike RE, contributed to CO2 emissions. This study underscored the importance of developing RE as a means to combat global warming. Within MERCOSUR countries, Related studies have highlighted the role of RE in mitigating CO2 emissions while implicating non-RE sources as a cause of CO2 emissions (De Souza et al., 2018; Kahia et al., 2019).
In some instance, RE, exports, and financial development stimulate economic growth (Hassine and Harrathi, 2017). RE may negatively impact economic growth, while non-RE sources may positively influence economic growth (Sinha et al., 2017). This was attributed to the cost of implementing RE systems in countries heavily reliant on non-RE sources. Rasoulinezhad and Saboori (2018) provided evidence in a study involving 12 selected Commonwealth States that RE reduced CO2 emissions, with similar effects attributed to financial development. Other studies, however, found a positive relationship between CO2 emissions and financial development (Pao et al., 2011; Pao and Tsai, 2011; Al-Mulali et al., 2015; Farhani and Ozturk, 2015).
Elsewhere in Asia, RE, research and development, and trade positively contributed to growth, while the same effect was not observed for non-RE consumption (Zafar et al., 2019). However, experiences from Africa were contrast that of Asian countries. For example, Nathaniel and Iheonu (2019) study in Africa, reveal that RE had a minimal impact on CO2 reduction, RE instead, enhanced environmental quality (Riti and Shu 2016).
In Malaysia, Lau et al. (2018) economic growth and foreign direct investment (FDI) are the main drivers of RE consumption. Similar results were reported for Turkey by Temiz Dinç and Akdoğan (2019). A feedback causality between RE and growth, as well as a one-way causal relationship from non-RE consumption to economic growth were found. Others (e.g., Khoshnevis Yazdi and Ghorchi Beygi, 2018) have demonstrated how trade and RE promoted environmental quality by reducing CO2 emissions in the African context.) But in the context of China, significant correlation was found between household size, income, and energy consumption (Ali et al., 2019). In western Africa, Radoine et al. (2022) analyzed by adopting the method of DriscollKraay panel regression. The panel result suggested that manufacturing value-added, urbanization, financial development, and foreign direct investment increase environmental degradation. In addition, the findings of this study revealed that economic growth and renewable energy consumption contribute, significantly, to environmental quality.
Rafei et al. (2022) study was probably one of the first studies to examine the effect of the economic complexity on ecological footprint and classify countries based on their institutional quality levels. Furthermore, the interaction of economic complexity and natural resource rents is considered as a new variable.
Furthermore, energy and environmental economics have highlighted the effects of human capital and manufacturing activities development on environmentally-driven urbanization. The connections between financial development, human capital development, and environmental deterioration have been the core of several research. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) is a major idea in this field of study. According to the EKC, environmental degradation initially rises with rising wealth per capita but then eventually falls. Recent studies, however, have questioned the reliability of the EKC, indicating that less developed nations are more capable of addressing environmental challenges than developed nations in terms of environmental norms (Stern, 2004).
Economic liberalization, the spread of clean technologies, and innovative methods to pollution management have all been recognized as significant impactful variables in developing nations as the driving forces behind environmentally-driven urbanization (Dasgupta et al., 2002). These elements contribute to environmental destruction and economic growth. In the context of environmentally-driven urbanization, it is also vital to take into account the connection between poverty and the deterioration of natural resources. The rural poor, who are frequently based in ecologically vulnerable regions, rely significantly on natural resources for their survival. Increased resource deterioration may result from this aforementioned dependency. Therefore, tackling poverty and giving the poor other means of subsistence is crucial factor for sustainable urbanization.
Overall, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of financial development and human capital. Thus, people’s knowledge, education, abilities, and skills, is essential for advancing sustainable development and environmental preservation. The ability of people to adopt sustainable practices and technology can be improved through investments in education and training (Xepapadeas, 2005).
3 Material and methods
In this research investigation, we incorporated specific variables, which encompassed CO2 emissions, GDP growth as an indicator of economic expansion, manufacturing value-added (MVA), urbanization rate (URB), investment in human capital development (HCD), and the utilization of renewable energy (RE). Our research focused on six countries in the MENA region: Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. For our analysis, we compiled annual data covering the period from 1990 to 2021. While our intention was to use more recent and comprehensive data, we were constrained by the availability of comprehensive and consistent CO2 emissions data, which was only available up to 2021.
The data used in this research study were obtained from the World Development Indicators (WDI) for the year 2023, which is made available by the World Bank. Information related to renewable energy was specifically extracted from the IEA (International Energy Agency) website. To calculate carbon emissions, the study uses the following equation or formula.
In Eq 1, the variable “CO2” represents carbon emissions measured in tonnes per capita. ‘‘GDP’’ is Gross Domestic Product per capita, expressed in current US dollars, and serves as a proxy for economic growth. ‘‘MVA’’ represents manufacturing value added as a percentage of total GDP. “URB is the urbanization rate, expressed as a percentage of the total population. “HCD” stands for Human Capital Development and measures a country’s development in terms of income, education and health (see Figure 1 and Table 1).
FIGURE 1. Conceptual framework. Source: authors constructed.
TABLE 1. Definition and data source of variables.
All of the variables utilized in this model are transformed into logarithmic form. This transformation is carried out to reduce the impact of extreme values in the data, ensuring a more stable and balanced analysis.
whereas i represents the number of countries; t shows the quantity of time; ε is the error term; and
4 Results and discussion
Table 2 shows the results of the VIF test for appropriate model selection (see Figure 2). Following the results, there is no multicollinearity problem in the built model and the variables used are appropriate for the model. Table 3 provides a summary of the sampled data set for the six countries over the 32-year time frame (1990–2021) of the variables defined below and represented in Figure 3–7. It can be seen that the median values of manufacturing value added, gross domestic product, CO2 emissions, urbanisation rate, human capital development and renewable energy use in the selected countries are 0.91, 4.09, 2.69, 4.27, −0.37 and 1.81 in logarithmic terms, respectively. Following the results on CO2 emissions, the maximum is 3.03 while the minimum is −0.14. Also, GDP ranges from 2.62 to 4.72 with a sample mean of 3.94. In the case of manufacturing value added, the sampled economies recorded a maximum of 3.05 and a minimum of 0.34, with an average of 2.59. Furthermore, urbanisation, recorded a maximum value of 4.52 and a minimum of 3.75 of the urban population, with an average annual rate of 4.20 of the urban population. Human capital development recorded the maximum of −0.13 and the minimum is −0.81 with an average annual rate of −0.39. While renewable energy consumption recorded the maximum of 3.14 and the minimum of −4.71 with an average annual rate of 0.96 in logarithmic terms.
FIGURE 2. Methodological framework. Source: authors constructed.
FIGURE 3. CO2 emission levels of MENA region Countries.
FIGURE 4. GDP levels of MENA region countries.
FIGURE 5. Urbanization rate levels of MENA region countries.
FIGURE 6. Manufacturing value-added levels of MENA region countries.
FIGURE 7. Human capital development levels of MENA region countries.
TABLE 2. The results of VIF test.
TABLE 3. Descriptive Statistics of selected variables.
For the six selected countries, Table 4 shows a negative correlation between CO2 emissions and the two indicators MVA and RE. On the other hand, CO2 emissions have a positive correlation with URB and HCD.
TABLE 4. Correlation analysis results.
The countries of the MENA region are linked through their involvement in manufacturing and various sectors of the economy, which promotes cross-sectional dependence among them. Therefore, as a first step, we examined the existence of cross-sectional dependence (CD) or independence among these countries. Thus, it is essential to assess the CD issue before conducting panel data estimates for the MENA region. In this regard, Table 5; Table 6 show that the existence of cross-sectional dependence has been established for both the model and the variable for the MENA countries. Furthermore, the results of the homogeneity test in Table 7 indicate that the slope coefficients have a heterogeneous structure.
TABLE 5. The results of cross-sectional dependence tests for variables.
TABLE 6. The results of homogeneity test.
TABLE 7. Panel unit root test results.
As a second step, the second-generation test (i.e., CADF test) is used for unit root testing, as opposed to the conventional unit root tests. This is crucial to study these methods of Pesaran (2007), as it can reveal the level of integration amidst CD and heterogeneity. The empirical results shown in Table 8 ensured that the variables in the MENA region panel are integrated at I (1) except for the LNURB variable, so we can check the cointegration among the variables. However, we have already found CD in our data.
TABLE 8. The results of cross-sectional dependence tests for model.
Having established the different order of integration of the selected series, the third step of our empirical study was to examine the cointegration properties using the Durbin-Hausman cointegration proposed by Westerlund (2008). This cointegration test is a test that can be applied to different levels of stationarity of the series. The results of the Westerlund test, as shown in Table 9, indicate the existence of a long-run relationship between CO2 as the dependent variable and our chosen explanatory variables. This observation implies the existence of cointegration between the series. Consequently, we accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis of ‘‘no cointegration’‘.
TABLE 9. Cointegration test Westerlund (2008).
After finding cointegration among variables, we use the mean group (MG), the mean group dynamic least squares (DOLSMG) developed by Pedroni (2001), the common correlated effect (CCE) developed by Pesaran (2006), the augmented mean group (AMG) introduced by Eberhardt and Bond (2009) and Eberhardt and Teal (2010), the cross-sectional augmented ARDL (CS-ARDL) introduced by Chudik et al. (2016) estimators. MG is an effective estimator when all parameters are heterogeneous but there is no cross-sectional dependence. Our parameters are heterogeneous and there is cross-sectional dependence in our model, so MG results are not reliable. However, other estimators produce effective results in the presence of heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. First, ceteris paribus, DOLSMG results show that a 1% increase in LNMVA reduces LNCO2 by 0.33%, conversely to the empirical results of Khan et al. (2021a) for the United States and Khan et al. (2021b) for thirty-eight IEA countries.
while a 1% increase in LNHCD increases LNCO2 by 2.25%. Another statistically significant result is that a 1% increase in LNRE reduces LNCO2 by 0.02%. These empirical results agree with the outcomes of Orhan et al. (2021) for India, Kirikkaleli and Adebayo (2021) for India, Shan et al. (2021) for highly decentralized economies, and Kirikkaleli and Adebayo (2020) for the global context. However, ceteris paribus, the CCE estimation results show that a 1% increase in LNHCD raises lnCO2 by 1.99%, while the AMG estimation results demonstrate that a 1% increase in LNHCD raises lnCO2 by 1.16%. In addition, for the AMG estimator, a 1% increase in LNRE reduces LNCO2 by 0.17%. However, the CS-ARDL method will provide unbiased and effective estimation results in the estimation of variables that are stationary at different degrees, as well as cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity (Chudik et al., 2016). In this context, the short-term estimation results of CS-ARDL indicate that a 1% increase in LNMVA reduces LNCO2 by 0.20%, while a 1% increase in LNHCD raises LNCO2 by 2.03%. The long-term results of CS-ARDL prove that a 1% increase in LNMVA reduces LNCO2 by 0.102, while a 1% increase in LNHCD rises LNCO2 by 1.05%. The result that manufacturing activities value-added (MVA) increases environmental quality is quite interesting. It can be expected that technology-based, environment-friendly value-added production will have a positive impact on environmental quality. On the other hand, the fact that the MVA variable was used as a ratio of GDP in the data set we used may have given this result (see Table 10).
TABLE 10. Slope coefficients estimation results.
After estimating the slope coefficients, the panel Fisher causality results developed by Emirmahmutoğlu and Köse (2011), which can be used for heterogeneous panels and variables based on different levels of stationarity, are presented. When examined by country, it was found that there is a unidirectional causal relationship from LNGDP, LNMVA, LNURB, LNHCR to LNCO2 in Saudi Arabia. While there is a unidirectional causality from LNMVA to LNCO2 in Jordan, it can be said that there is a unidirectional causality from LNURB to LNCO2 in Tunisia (see Table 11).
TABLE 11. Panel Fisher causality tests.
There is also a unidirectional causality from LNRE to LNCO2 in Tunisia. In the full panel, unidirectional causality was found from LNGDP to LNCO2, from LNMVA to LNCO2, from LNURB to LNCO2, from LNHCR to LNCO2, from LNRE to LNCO2. According to the more reliable bootstrap p-values, there is a unidirectional causal relationship only from LNMVA and LNRE to LNCO2.
5 Conclusion and policy implications
5.1 Conclusion
The paper examines the interplay between urbanization, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality in six Middle Eastern and North African countries. In so doing, we highlight the important of human capital development plays in influencing environmentally-driven urbanization. By making investments in education, knowledge-based economies, and skill-building programs, urban residents may adopt sustainable lifestyles and advance eco-friendly urban planning. The major impact of human capital development should be considered by decision-makers and urban planners when developing strategies to deal with the environmental issues arising by increasing urbanization. Big cities can create the conditions for future economic growth that is more ecologically friendly and sustainable by encouraging the development of an informed and competent urban populace.
In conclusion, in the MENA region’s urbanization highly complex driven by diverse issue but more influenced by human capital and manufacturing activities development. Various factors, including economic liberalization, the spread of clean technologies, poverty, and access to financial services, have influence the interaction between economic development, human capital, manufacturing activities, and environmental degradation. In order to create effective policies and strategies to advance sustainable urbanization in the area, it is essential for further studies to pay to environmentally-driven urbanization processes in the MENA region.
5.2 Policy implications
Our empirical results offer different policy implications towards enhancing environmental quality in the MENA region. To ensure sustainable urbanization and energy consumption in MENA countries, there is a need to put in place an urban development policy capable of accommodating the rate of urbanization, and an energy policy that will ensure the sustainability of the energy consumption in the long-run. Furthermore, there is a need for industrial sector transformation towards the green economy to combat the environmental challenges emanating from economic growth. The countries in MENA region should enforce their rules and regulations regarding the conservation of the environment so that environmental health is more emphasized. Finally, to achieve urbanization sustainability, effective energy, economic, and environmental policies are required to guide the rate of urbanization towards the reduction ofCO2 emissions to achieve better environmental quality, without compromising economic growth. Therefore, policymakers in urban planning should aim at reducing the urbanization level by practicing effective land use to encourage green and intelligent urbanization. This will ameliorate the influence of urbanization on environmental degradation. Despite the study’s considerable contribution to environmental literature, particularly in MENA region, it has several drawbacks such as the use of only five indicators for the analysis. Therefore, we recommend that future research incorporate more parameters and investigate their impact on various environmental metrics.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.
Author contributions
SB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. HR: Writing–review and editing. AC: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. FD: Writing–review and editing. SD: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research paper is supported by funding from the research project “Sustainable, Resilient and Smart African Cities”, a scientific collaboration between Mohammed VI Polytechnic University-Morocco and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne-Switzerland (AS22).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abbasi, K. R., Shahbaz, M., Zhang, J., Irfan, M., and Alvarado, R. (2022). Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: the role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy. Renew. Energy 187, 390–402. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.066
Abdouli, M., and Hammami, S. (2017). Exploring links between FDI inflows, energy consumption, and economic growth: further evidence from MENA countries. J. Econ. Dev. 42 (1), 95–117. doi:10.35866/caujed.2017.42.1.005
Alharthi, M., Dogan, E., and Taskin, D. (2021). Analysis of CO2 emissions and energy consumption by sources in MENA countries: evidence from quantile regressions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 38901–38908. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13356-0
Ali, G., Yan, N., Hussain, J., Xu, L., Huang, Y., Xu, S., et al. (2019). Quantitative assessment of energy conservation and renewable energy awareness among variant urban communities of Xiamen, China. Renew. Sust. Energ Rev. 109, 230–238. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.028
Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., and Lean, H. H. (2015). The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat. Hazards 79 (1), 621–644. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1865-9
Alola, A. A. (2019b). Carbon emissions and the trilemma of trade policy, migration policy and health care in the US. Carbon Manag. 10, 209–218. doi:10.1080/17583004.2019.1577180
Apergis, N., Kuziboev, B., Abdullaev, I., and Rajabov, A. (2023). Investigating the association among CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Uzbekistan: an ARDL approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (14), 39666–39679. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-25023-z
Azizalrahman, H., and Hasyimi, V. (2019). A model for urban sector drivers of carbon emissions. Sustain Cities Soc. 44, 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.035
Baer, D., Loewen, B., Cheng, C., Thomsen, J., Wyckmans, A., Temeljotov-Salaj, A., et al. (2021). Approaches to social innovation in positive energy districts (PEDs)—a comparison of Norwegian projects. Sustainability 13 (13), 7362. doi:10.3390/su13137362
Bajja, S., Radoine, H., Abbas, S., Dakyaga, F., and Chenal, J. (2023). Determinants of urban environmental quality in Morocco: the roles of energy consumption, urbanization, manufacturing, and financial development in achieving SDG 13. Front. Environ. Sci. 20 (11), 1174439. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1174439
Baloch, M. A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., and Iqbal, Z. (2019a). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 (6), 6199–6208. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., dos Santos Parente, C. C., Leitão, N. C., and Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2023b). The influence of economic complexity processes and renewable energy on CO2 emissions of BRICS. What about industry 4.0? Resour. Policy 82, 103547. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103547
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Nur, T., Topaloglu, E. E., and Evcimen, C. (2023a). Assessing the impact of the economic complexity on the ecological footprint in G7 countries: fresh evidence under human development and energy innovation processes. Gondwana Res. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.017
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Murshed, M., and Nuta, F. M. (2023c). Environmental impact of globalization: the case of central and Eastern European emerging economies. J. Environ. Manag. 341, 118018. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118018
Baltagi, B. H., and Li, D. (2002). Series estimation of partially linear panel data models with fixed effects. Ann. Econ. finance 3 (1), 103–116.
Bekun, F. V., Emir, F., and Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 759–765. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.271
Bello, M. O., Solarin, S. A., and Yen, Y. Y. (2018). The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J. Environ. Manag. 219, 218–230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101
Bidone, F. (2022). Driving governance beyond ecological modernization: REDD+ and the Amazon Fund. Environ. Policy Gov. 32 (2), 110–121. doi:10.1002/eet.1969
Charfeddine, L., and Kahia, M. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renew. Energy 139, 198–213. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Chen, M., Liu, W., and Lu, D. (2016). Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization. Land use policy 55, 334–339. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.025
Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., and Raissi, M. (2016). Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Damrah, S., Satrovic, E., Atyeh, M., and Shawtari, F. A. (2022b). Employing the panel quantile regression approach to examine the role of natural resources in achieving environmental sustainability: does globalization create some difference? Mathematics 10 (24), 4795. doi:10.3390/math10244795
Damrah, S., Satrovic, E., and Shawtari, F. A. (2022a). How does financial inclusion affect environmental degradation in the six oil exporting countries? The moderating role of information and communication technology. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1013326. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1013326
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., and Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J. Econ. Perspect. 16 (1), 147–168. doi:10.1257/0895330027157
Delponte, I., and Schenone, C. (2020). RES Implementation in urban areas: an updated overview. Sustainability 12 (1), 382. doi:10.3390/su12010382
De Souza, E. S., de Souza Freire, F., and Pires, J. (2018). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the MERCOSUR: the role of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (21), 20769–20781. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2231-8
Destek, M. A., and Okumuş, İ. (2019). G-20 ülkelerinde biyokütle enerji tüketimi, ekonomik büyüme ve CO2 emisyonu. J. Soc. Sci. Mus. Alparslan Univ. 7 (1), 347–353. doi:10.18506/anemon.453801
Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., and Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (29), 29387–29396. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Doğan, B., Chu, L. K., Ghosh, S., Truong, H. H. D., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? Renew. Energy 187, 645–656. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.077
Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., and Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2019). Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ. 30, 1065–1086. doi:10.1177/0958305x19834279
Eberhardt, M., and Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator. Germany: University Library of Munich. MPRA Paper, No. 17692.
Eberhardt, M., and Teal, F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Oxford: University of Oxford. Discussion Paper, No. 515.
Effiong, E. L. (2018). On the urbanization-pollution nexus in Africa: a semiparametric analysis. Qual. Quantity 52 (1), 445–456. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0477-8
Emirmahmutoğlu, F., and Köse, N. (2011). Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Econ. Model. 28, 870–876. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.018
Esmaeili, P., Lorente, D. B., and Anwar, A. (2023). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypothesis in N-11 economies: fresh evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ. Res. 228, 115844. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.115844
Farhani, S., and Ozturk, I. (2015). Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (20), 15663–15676. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1
Feruni, N., Hysa, E., Panait, M., Rădulescu, I. G., and Brezoi, A. (2020). The impact of corruption, economic freedom and urbanization on economic development: western Balkans versus EU-27. Sustainability 12 (22), 9743. doi:10.3390/su12229743
Fu, J., and Ng, A. W. (2021). Scaling up renewable energy assets: issuing green bond via structured public-private collaboration for managing risk in an emerging economy. Energies 14 (11), 3076. doi:10.3390/en14113076
Ghafar, A. (2020). Convergence between 21st century skills and entrepreneurship education in higher education institutes. Int. J. High. Educ. 9 (1), 218–229. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p218
Gokmenoglu, K. K., and Sadeghieh, M. (2019). Financial development, CO2 emissions, fossil fuel consumption and economic growth: the case of Turkey. Strateg. Plan. Energy Environ. 38 (4), 7–28. doi:10.1080/10485236.2019.12054409
Gorus, M. S., and Aslan, M. (2019). Impacts of economic indicators on environmental degradation: evidence from MENA countries. Renew. Sust. Energ Rev. 103, 259–268. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.042
Guo, L., and Liu, Y. (2022). Urban-industrial development and regional economic growth in a developing country: a spatial econometric approach. SAGE Open 12 (2), 215824402211024. doi:10.1177/21582440221102425
Guo, Q., Abbas, S., AbdulKareem, H. K., Shuaibu, M. S., Khudoykulov, K., and Saha, T. (2023). Devising strategies for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa: the roles of renewable, non-renewable energy, and natural resources. Energy 284, 128713. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128713
Hafner, M., Raimondi, P. P., and Bonometti, B. (2023). “The MENA region: an economic, energy, and historical context,” in The energy sector and energy geopolitics in the MENA region at crossroad: towards a great transformation? (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 3–25.
Hassan, S. T., Xia, E., Khan, N. H., and Shah, S. M. A. (2019). Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 (3), 2929–2938. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
Hassine, M. B., and Harrathi, N. (2017). The causal links between economic growth, renewable energy, financial development and foreign trade in gulf cooperation council countries. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 7 (2), 76–85.
Hu, T. S., Pan, S. C., and Lin, H. P. (2021). Development, innovation, and circular stimulation for a knowledge-based city: key thoughts. Energies 14 (23), 7999. doi:10.3390/en14237999
Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resour. Policy 76, 102569. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569
Jahanger, A., Yu, Y., Hossain, M. R., Murshed, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., and Khan, U. (2022). Going away or going green in NAFTA nations? Linking natural resources, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability through the lens of the EKC hypothesis. Resour. Policy 79, 103091. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103091
Jin, T., and Kim, J. (2018). What is better for mitigating carbon emissions– renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis. Renew. Sust. Energ Rev. 91, 464–471. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., and Hansen, R. (2022). Principles for urban nature-based solutions. Ambio 51 (6), 1388–1401. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w
Kahia, M., Jebli, M. B., and Belloumi, M. (2019). Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean. Techn Environ. Policy 21 (4), 871–885. doi:10.1007/s10098-019-01676-2
Kain, J. H., Adelfio, M., Stenberg, J., and Thuvander, L. (2022). Towards a systemic understanding of compact city qualities. J. Urban Des. 27 (1), 130–147. doi:10.1080/13574809.2021.1941825
Khalil, R. G., Damrah, S., Bajaher, M., and Shawtari, F. A. (2023). Unveiling the relationship of ESG, fintech, green finance, innovation and sustainability: case of Gulf countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 116299–116312. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-30584-8
Khan, I., Hou, F., and Le, H. P. (2021a). The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci. Total Environ. 754, 142222. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222
Khan, I., Hou, F., Zakari, A., and Tawiah, V. (2021b). The dynamic links among energy transitions, energy consumption, and sustainable economic growth: a novel framework for IEA countries. Energy 222, 119935. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119935
Khoshnevis Yazdi, S., and Ghorchi Beygi, E. (2018). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions: for selected African countries. Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 13 (1), 13–20. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1377319
Kirikkaleli, D., and Adebayo, T. S. (2020). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustain. Dev. 29, 583–594. doi:10.1002/sd.2159
Kirikkaleli, D., and Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Do public-private partnerships in energy and renewable energy consumption matter for consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in India? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 12, 30139–30152. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12692-5
Lau, L. S., Yii, K. J., Lee, C. Y., Chong, Y. L., and Lee, E. H. (2018). Investigating the determinants of renewable energy consumption in Malaysia: an ARDL approach. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 19 (3), 886–903.
Li, Z., and Pang, C. (2022). Does digital economy contribute to regional carbon productivity evidence of China? Math. Problems Eng., 2022.
Liu, P., Jia, S., Han, R., Liu, Y., Lu, X., and Zhang, H. (2020). RS and GIS supported urban LULC and UHI change simulation and assessment. J. Sensors 2020, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2020/5863164
Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O., and Shah, M. (2020). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 14601–14613. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7
Nathaniel, S. P., and Iheonu, C. I. (2019). Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci. Total Environ. 679, 337–345. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011
Orhan, A., Adebayo, T. S., Genç, S. Y., and Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Investigating the linkage between economic growth and environmental sustainability in India: do agriculture and trade openness matter? Sustainability 13, 4753. doi:10.3390/su13094753
Ozcan, B., Apergis, N., and Shahbaz, M. (2018). A revisit of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: new evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (32), 32381–32394. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3165-x
Pao, H. T., and Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36 (1), 685–693. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
Pao, H. T., Yu, H. C., and Yang, Y. H. (2011). Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy 36 (8), 5094–5100. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.004
Pazienza, M., de Jong, M., and Schoenmaker, D. (2022). Clarifying the concept of corporate sustainability and providing convergence for its definition. Sustainability 14 (13), 7838. doi:10.3390/su14137838
Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev. Econ. Statistics 83 (4), 727–731. doi:10.1162/003465301753237803
Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74 (4), 967–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of crosssection dependence. J. Appl. Econ. 22, 265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951
Radoine, H., Bajja, S., Chenal, J., and Ahmed, Z. (2022). Impact of urbanization and economic growth on environmental quality in western Africa: do manufacturing activities and renewable energy matter? Front. Environ. Sci. 13 (10), 1012007. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1012007
Rafei, M., Esmaeili, P., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). A step towards environmental mitigation: how do economic complexity and natural resources matter? Focusing on different institutional quality level countries. Resour. Policy 78, 102848. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102848
Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M., Xia, W., Ikram, M., Shoaib, H. M., and Shahzad, U. (2022). Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 24 (4), 4623–4640. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01625-4
Rana, M. M. P. (2011). Urbanization and sustainability: challenges and strategies for sustainable urban development in Bangladesh. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 13, 237–256. doi:10.1007/s10668-010-9258-4
Randolph, G. F., and Storper, M. (2023). Is urbanisation in the Global South fundamentally different? Comparative global urban analysis for the 21st century. Urban Stud. 60 (1), 3–25. doi:10.1177/00420980211067926
Rasoulinezhad, E., and Saboori, B. (2018). Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (18), 17354–17370. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1827-3
Rasoulinezhad, E., and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Role of green finance in improving energy efficiency and renewable energy development. Energy Effic. 15 (2), 14. doi:10.1007/s12053-022-10021-4
Riti, J. S., and Shu, Y. (2016). Renewable energy, energy efficiency, and eco-friendly environment (R-E5) in Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6 (1), 1–16.
Saidi, H., El Montasser, G., and Ajmi, N. (2018). Renewable energy, quality of Institutions and Economic growth in MENA countries: a panel cointegration approach. Munich Personal. RePEc Arch., 84055.
Saint Akadiri, S., Alkawfi, M. M., Uğural, S., and Akadiri, A. C. (2019). Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization. Sci. Total Environ. 671, 1293–1301. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.448
Salvucci, R., Petrović, S., Karlsson, K., Wråke, M., Uteng, T. P., and Balyk, O. (2019). Energy scenario analysis for the Nordic transport sector: a critical review. Energies 12 (12), 2232. doi:10.3390/en12122232
Satari Yuzbashkandi, S., Mehrjo, A., and Eskandari Nasab, M. H. (2023). Exploring the dynamic nexus between urbanization, energy efficiency, renewable energies, economic growth, with ecological footprint: a panel cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag evidence along Middle East and North Africa countries. Energy and Environ. doi:10.1177/0958305x231181672
Satrovic, E., Cetindas, A., Akben, I., and Damrah, S. (2023). Do natural resource dependence, economic growth and transport energy consumption accelerate ecological footprint in the most innovative countries? The moderating role of technological innovation. Gondwana Res. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.008
Shan, S., Ahmad, M., Tan, Z., Adebayo, T. S., Man Li, R. Y. M., and Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: tracking environmental sustainability. Energy 234, 121243. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121243
Sinha, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Zafar, M. W., and Saleem, M. M. (2022). Analyzing global inequality inaccess to energy: developing policy framework by inequality decomposition. J. Environ. Manag. 304, 114299. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114299
Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., and Balsalobre, D. (2017). Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 1217–1229. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071
Šlaus, I., and Jacobs, G. (2011). Human capital and sustainability. Sustainability 3 (1), 97–154. doi:10.3390/su3010097
Snieška, V., and Zykiene, I. (2014). The role of infrastructure in the future city: theoretical perspective. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 156, 247–251. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.183
Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32 (8), 1419–1439. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Temiz Dinç, D., and Akdoğan, E. C. (2019). Renewable energy production, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth in Turkey: a VECM approach. Sustainability 11 (5), 1273. doi:10.3390/su11051273
Treiblmaier, H., Rejeb, A., and Strebinger, A. (2020). Blockchain as a driver for smart city development: application fields and a comprehensive research agenda. Smart Cities 3 (3), 853–872. doi:10.3390/smartcities3030044
Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J. Appl. Econ. 23, 193–233. doi:10.1002/jae.967
Yang, Z., Abbas, Q., Hanif, I., Alharthi, M., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Aziz, B., et al. (2021). Short- and long-run influence of energy utilization and economic growth on carbon discharge in emerging SREB economies. Renew. Energy 165 (1), 43–51. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.141
Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., Hou, F., and Sinha, A. (2019). From nonrenewable to renewable energy and its impact on economic growth: the role of research and development expenditures in Asia-Pacific economic cooperation countries. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 1166–1178. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.081
Zhang, X., Han, L., Wei, H., Tan, X., Zhou, W., Li, W., et al. (2022). Linking urbanization and air quali-ty together: a review and a perspective on the future sustainable urban development. J. Clean. Prod. 346, 130988. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130988
Keywords: renewable energy, urbanization, economic growth, manufacturing activities, CO2 emission, MENA region
Citation: Bajja S, Radoine H, Celik A, Dakyaga F and Damrah S (2024) Human capital and manufacturing activities under environmentally-driven urbanization in the MENA region. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1322789. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1322789
Received: 16 October 2023; Accepted: 20 November 2023;
Published: 03 January 2024.
Edited by:
Mobeen Ur Rehman, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST), United Arab EmiratesReviewed by:
Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, University of Castilla-La Mancha, SpainMajed Alharthi, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Copyright © 2024 Bajja, Radoine, Celik, Dakyaga and Damrah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Salwa Bajja, c2Fsd2EuYmFqamFAdW02cC5tYQ==