Kai Huang
Lei Liu
Zhen Wang- 1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
- 2Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- 3College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Socioeconomic transition and environmental footprints
The Earth system has been impacted in unprecedented ways by rapid socioeconomic development since the entry into the Anthropocene. Therefore, it has become essential to understand the complex relationship between socioeconomic development and the natural environment. One of the methods, used to track the effect of human activities on the environment, is environmental footprint assessment. Since this method was introduced, environmental footprints indicators have been applied to measure the impact of human activities on various types of resources, such as water, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, etc., (Cui et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023).
Analysis of environmental footprints plays a vital role in quantifying the environmental impact of human activities on the Earth system and prioritizing actions that will advance the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Socioeconomic transitions, such as industrial transformation, energy transition, human migration, and dietary changes; may have a significant effect on environmental footprints (Wei et al., 2020; Liang and Zhong, 2023). Therefore, identifying how socioeconomic factors affect the environmental footprints is crucial, to form policies that will mitigate the anthropogenic impact on the regional and global scale, thus helping accomplish SDGs.
The dependence on fossil fuels for economic growth has resulted in an increase in CO2 emissions. Increased economic growth and urbanization require more stringent environmental policies to balance energy demand and carbon emissions. Talib et al. examines the non-linear effect of economic growth and urban dynamics on environmental degradation in a comprehensive panel data of 66 countries and across respective income groups for the period 1990–2016. The study reveals the bell-shaped effect of economic growth on environmental degradation, as well as the inverted U-shaped impact of urbanization and urban agglomerations on CO2 emissions. The empirical findings also reveal the heterogeneous non-linear effects of urban dynamics across different income categories of selected economies. Additionally, by employing heterogeneous Dumitrescu and Hurlin (D-H) (Granger non-causality test) and establishing significant unilateral and bilateral causality of structural change and urban dynamics with environmental degradation. This study emphasizes the important role of eco-friendly industrial and energy policies in achieving long-term social, economic and environmental sustainability.
Renewable energy has a key role to play in stabilizing economic growth and mitigating climate change, yet achieving a socio-ecological balance still requires technological innovation, financial development, and structural optimization of energy consumption. Using an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) model spanning the period 1990–2017, Wen et al. investigated the role of public-private partnership investment (PPPI) on the ecological footprint (EF) of the South Asia and Pacific region in terms of energy and transportation, financial development, and renewable energy. The study helps decision-makers in developing countries to formulate policies for economically and ecologically sustainable development.
Environmental degradation is increasing within countries, but in the context of economic globalization, environmental problems does not always occur independently, and the economic linkages between countries make it necessary to pay more attention to the coordination of the producers and the consumers in combating environmental impacts. Zhang and Han provides new insights into the drivers of carbon emissions decoupling from both production- and consumption-based perspectives. Based on the multiregional input-output model and the Tapio decoupling decomposition, the study quantitatively analyze the decoupling evolution and decomposition drivers of economic activities and carbon emissions in the countries along the Belt and Road. The results show that developed economies with advanced technology and optimized industries tend to maintain a stable and strong decoupling of carbon emissions, while developing countries and emerging economies with a large number of low-end manufacturing industries have a more fluctuating decoupling. Fossil energy combustion associated with economic development is a major contributor to carbon emissions. This study emphasizes that practical strategies for energy restructuring and harmonization of development patterns are essential for the construction of the Green Silk Road.
The regional heterogeneity of resource endowment and technology level makes high-spatial-resolution environmental impact analysis a trend. Environmental and economic impacts play an important role in regional industry development. Wang measures the quality of green development in the construction industry in two-dimensional space-time based on a panel data of construction industry development in 31 provinces from 2006 to 2020, focusing on regional differences, dynamic evolutionary trends and distributional convergence. The study emphasizes the importance of scientific and technological inputs, human capital inputs, and green construction models in transforming of China’s construction industry to green and high-quality development.
The Research Topic on Socioeconomic Transition and Environmental Footprints provides valuable recommendations for achieving long-term social, economic and environmental sustainability in the face of socioeconomic change. The Research Topic expands the scope of environmental impact studies by analyzing the environmental footprint of social metabolism and its organic integration with socio-economic transformation extensively. Nesting socio-economic development and the natural environment within each other at the industrial, regional and trade levels contributes to the realization of efficient economic development, equitable societies and sustainable environments for future human wellbeing as well as an ecologically functional and diverse planet. The various studies presented here focus on the complexities and conflicts between a particular environmental aspect and socio-economic transformation. We believe that by adopting a multi-model decision-making approach as well as multidisciplinary integration, it is possible to harmonize socioeconomic transformation with environmental cutbacks to form a society centered on human wellbeing and ecological and environmental protection.
Author contributions
KH: Writing–original draft. LL: Writing–review and editing. ZW: Writing–review and editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Cui, H., Wang, Z., Yan, H., Cai, L., Jiang, X., Wang, L., et al. (2022). Production-based and consumption-based accounting of global cropland soil erosion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 10465–10473. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c01855
Li, J., Huang, K., Yu, Y., Shen, Q., and Xu, M. (2023). Telecoupling China’s city-level water withdrawal with distant consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 4332–4341. doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c00757
Liang, S., and Zhong, Q. (2023). Reducing environmental impacts through socioeconomic transitions: critical review and prospects. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 17, 24. doi:10.1007/s11783-023-1624-1
Keywords: social transition, economic transition, carbon footprint, water footprint, ecological footprint
Citation: Huang K, Liu L and Wang Z (2023) Editorial: Socioeconomic transition and environmental footprints. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1279567. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1279567
Received: 18 August 2023; Accepted: 28 August 2023;
Published: 04 September 2023.
Edited and reviewed by:
Faik Bilgili, Erciyes University, TürkiyeCopyright © 2023 Huang, Liu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhen Wang, c2lub29AbWFpbC5oemF1LmVkdS5jbg==