- 1Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 2China Center for Urban Development, National Development and Reform Commission Beijing China, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua-BP Clean Energy Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- 3Department of Economics, Party School of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, Beijing, China
- 4Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
- 5School of Public Administration of Guangxi University, China Center for Agricultural Policy (CCAP), School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
With ambitious carbon peak and carbon neutral targets, China has to realize it relies heavily on significant reductions in energy-related carbon emissions. Therefore, as the largest contributing region, resource-based cities (RBCs) must achieve an energy transition. Unfortunately, these cities are facing serious environmental problems. The aim of this study is to analyze the development history and problems of RBCs by using the example of the Northeast region. The results show the reasons blocking the green development of these cities include management policies and life cycles. This implies the management of RBCs needs to develop toward a win-win situation of industrial transformation and ecological protection. Finally, some policy recommendations are proposed to achieve emission reduction and sustainable development.
Introduction
RBCs were once regarded as cities with a single extractive industry as the pillar industry and dominated by one industrial company. Moreover, they have been essential for industrialization and urbanization in China. Generally, they are also called mining towns or RBCs (Yan et al., 2019). In recent years, due to the decrease in recoverable resources, it has been more and more difficult to exploit the resources. With the pressure of survival and development, the exploitation intensity of natural resources has increased, and thus resource exploitation has transferred from developed countries to many developing ones (He et al., 2017; Wang Y. et al., 2020). However, due to the fragile economic foundation of these developing countries, resource development causes many economic problems, such as low per capita GDP, unbalanced economic and industrial structure, heavy labor pressure, and reduced tax revenue, hurting the long-term sustainability of the cities. (Li et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; He et al., 2017; Li and Dewan, 2017; Ruan et al., 2020). Besides, large-scale resource extraction can also bring serious environmental problems to RBCs, including accelerated resource extraction and depletion, and increased pollution levels in the existing environment (Krueger and Grossman, 1991). Fossil energy extraction, for example, on the one hand, creates a large amount of solid waste, leading to surface and groundwater pollution and air pollution if not properly treated (Wiedensohler et al., 2009). On the other hand, it will cause ground collapse, ground fractures, and other geoenvironmental high-risk areas to expand (Tan J. et al., 2017), causing waste of land resources and further increasing environmental pressure (Zoundi, 2017). These crises threaten the development of RBCs in many developing countries. Some scholars (Xia et al., 2021) mentioned that the sustainable development of RBCs needs to be realized through a transformation because the resources are non-renewable. Naturally, how to solve the current problems of RBCs and finally realize the transformation of RBCs has become a hot issue.
In the context of carbon peak and carbon neutrality targets, the relationship between RBCs and carbon emissions has received much academic attention. However, the impact of RBCs development on carbon emissions is uncertain. On the one hand, Hou et al. (2018) argued that the development of RBCs was accompanied by a heavy reliance on fossil energy and an irrational industrial structure, i.e., the “lock-in effect”. This implies the sloppy development pattern caused by this effect will further promote carbon emissions (Sun Q. et al., 2021). On the other hand, Zhou et al. (2022) suggested that RBCs with low carbon as the goal can enhance carbon emission efficiency, which will help to promote carbon emission reduction and achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality in advance. Similar findings can be found in Zhang M. et al (2022), and Zheng and Ge (2022). Many scholars support this view and argue that China’s achievement of carbon peak and carbon neutrality depends on RBC’s low-carbon development (Ma et al., 2021; Guo, 2021; Liao et al., 2022). According to statistics, RBCs consume 60% of national energy (Fong et al., 2008; Zhang H. et al., 2022). The per capita carbon emission of RBCs is twice the national average. Besides, the carbon emission intensity of RBCs is 1.5 times the national average (Sun X. et al., 2021). Therefore, it is significant to achieve sustainable development through improving energy resilience among RBCs (Tan P. et al., 2017, 2020) under the carbon peak and carbon neutrality targets.
This study chooses Northeast China as a typical case to study China’s RBCs. First and foremost, Northeast China not only includes many representative RBCs (Wang Y. et al., 2020) but also has to bear relatively high pressure on environmental governance, similar to other RBCs. Up to now, there are 39 RBCs in the urban agglomeration of Northeast China, with a single economic structure, dual management system, and differentiated urban functions (Tan J. et al., 2017). At the same time, according to the list of difficulties in transforming RBCs published by Peking University in 2017, the top four cities are located in Northeast China. To some extent, it reflects that the RBCs in Northeast China face relatively high transformation pressure. There are still some undiscovered and unsolved deep-seated contradictions to be solved. Hence, the ecological transformation of RBCs in Northeast China is imminent (Wang et al., 2020a, b). Secondly, the Chinese government has constantly been attaching great importance to urban construction in Northeast China, making the case particular. The Chinese government has promulgated a series of policies targeting the development of this area. However, as in many other countries rich in natural resources, the resources of these cities have not been the motivation for their development, but have left them far behind other cities, thus seriously hindering the overall progress of the country (Sachs and Warner, 2001; Chen et al., 2018; Ruan et al., 2020).
Therefore, this paper also used case studies (Omolade et al., 2019; John and Tasciotti, 2020; Nel and Connelly, 2020) to expound on the typical RBCs and analyze their dilemma and solutions for reference, with the following two contribution. First, compared to Reid and Gartell. (2013) and Mitchell and O’Neill. (2016), this paper can provide a more comprehensive overview of the development history of the Northeast region. Second, although the quantitative research methods used in Zhang M. et al. (2022) (Zhang H. et al., 2022) and Zheng and Ge. (2022) did not be used, this paper, similar to Sunikka (2006) and Liu and Gallagher (2010), is an exploratory approach to considering what policies governments in developing countries can adopt to guide the development of RBCs in the context of the “paradox” of economic transformation and environmental protection.
The rest of this paper is structured as follows. The second part is a case study including the basic situation, the dilemma, and underlying causes in Northeast China. The third part is policy recommendations. The Final is the conclusion.
Case study
Basic situation of northeast china
Northeast China consists of three provinces and part of an autonomous region: Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and eastern Inner Mongolia. The land area is 1.45 million square kilometers, and the total population is up to 120 million in this region (China Bureau of Statistics, 2019). As shown in Figure 1, resources in Northeast China accounted for a high proportion of national output in the 1940s. For this reason, Northeast China is known as China’s old heavy industry base.
According to the National sustainable development plan for resource-based cities (2013–2020) (State Council, 2013), there are 39 RBCs in Northeast China, and their distribution is shown in Table 1.
The dilemma of transformation and development in northeast China
Reviewing the development process of RBCs in Northeast China, there are the following development problems.
1) Northeast China has a large number of RBCs with diverse types and different development stages. In terms of resource types, the RBCs in Northeast China can be divided into coal-based cities, including Fushun; oil-based cities, such as Daqing, Songyuan, and Panjin; cities dominated by iron and steel industry, including Fuxin; dominated by nonferrous metal mineral RBCs and nonmetal RBCs, including Huludao, and Tieli city; forestry industry cities, including Yichun and Heihe. At the same time, from the development status of these cities, according to the division of RBCs in the Plan, 39 RBCs in Northeast China include two growing resource cities, 13 mature resource cities, 19 declining resource cities, and five renewable resource cities, as shown in Table 2.
2) RBCs in Northeast China have economic problems such as a single industrial structure and slow regional economic growth. At first, relying on unique natural resources, Northeast China was devoted to developing many serious pollution industries, such as metallurgy, machinery, and building materials. At the same time, other industrial sectors were still unchanged. It results in a single industrial structure, as shown in Figure 2.
After more than half a hundred years of exploitation and excavation, many RBCs in Northeast China began to experience resource depletion, economic recession, and population loss (Yang et al., 2022), and the low learning and innovation capacity hindered the development of alternative industries (Yu and Cheng, 2016). These problems led to the bankruptcy and relocation of many industrial enterprises (Yang et al., 2022), causing sharp urban unemployment and continuous urban population loss (Yu and Cheng, 2016). Meanwhile, most cities in Northeast China do not have medium and long-term development plans and cannot implement new energy projects to improve energy efficiency due to policy conflicts (Yu and Cheng, 2016). In addition, the labor force shortage has emerged, and the alternative for high energy-consuming industries is still too immature to make up for economic losses, which comprehensively leads to the slow growth of the regional economy.
3) Environmental problems such as land collapse and soil erosion are common in RBCs in Northeast China. For coal mining, underground mining was carried out around mines in Northeast China, resulting in large-scale surface subsidence and destruction of various buildings, roads, bridges, and farmlands. According to the survey, at the end of 1995, the area of land collapsed by state-owned coal mines in China was about 350,000 ha. Taking Liaoyuan for instance, the subsidence area, mined-out area, and unstable subsidence area formed by history were 18.95, 14.58, and 15.66 square kilometers, respectively (Jilin Provincial government, 2016). Similarly, the coal mined-out area of Shuangyashan is 116.6 square kilometers, and the subsidence area was 62 square kilometers, involving 68,000 residents. Moreover, Datong produces two billion tons of coal annually and forms nearly 45,000 ha of mined-out areas. In addition, environmental problems such as industrial pollution, landslides, and soil erosion (Tan P. et al., 2017) in large areas of river basins are also severe. Taking Jilin Province as an example, the monitoring results show that the soil erosion area in 2019 was 41,800 square kilometers, accounting for 21.95% of the province’s total land area (Jilin Provincial government, 2020).
Dilemma causes
The dilemma faced by RBCs in Northeast China is caused by two factors. On the one hand, the plight of RBCs in Northeast China is closely related to management policies. As the first region in China to implement a planned economy, Northeast China, with its industrial base and a large number of natural resources, has undertaken most of the industrial production tasks of the new China since the 1950s (Li et al., 2013). Under the guidance of the planned economy, resource exploitation in the Northeast became more frequent in order to secure the needs of national economic development. Subsequently, reform and opening up emerged in China’s southeast coastal regions. The Northeast failed to effectively attract foreign investment because of geographic constraints resulting in fewer new industrial layouts and a large population loss to the southeastern coastal regions (Yang et al., 2018). In the 1990s, China started a wave of state-owned enterprise reforms. This directly led to the layoff of eight million workers in Northeast China (accounting for nearly 30% of the country), making the development of this area increasingly difficult (Mak, 2008).
On the other hand, these difficulties are related to the characteristics of RBCs. According to the life cycle theory, RBCs have a four-stage development process (growth-maturity-recession, and regeneration). Similarly, RBCs in Northeast China first relied on natural resources such as coal and iron ore to form highly overwhelming energy-consuming industries to stimulate economic development during the formative years. Subsequently, the original pillar industries matured but were impacted by the emerging industries due to their low technology and slow development of successive replacement industries (Yu and Cheng, 2016). Then, during the recession phase, RBCs lose their original resource advantages due to the non-renewal of mineral resources, resulting in the frequent closure of industrial enterprises (Yang et al., 2022). Consequently, the labor force moved out due to fewer job opportunities. Finally, life cycle theory states RBCs in the regeneration stage can eliminate dependency on resources and achieve high-quality economic development and environmental protection benefits. However, for RBCs in Northeast China, most of them are in the maturity and decline stages, therefore, how to get rid of resource dependence and move to the regeneration stage are the main difficulties for RBCs in China at present.
Policy implications
This paper shows the challenges faced by some RBCs in the development by taking Northeast China as an example. Overall, the case of Northeast China reveals the general characteristics of RBC. The leading solution to these problems is to develop replacement industries or improve the competitiveness of resource-based industries (Yu and Cheng, 2016) while building a green development mechanism of resource conservation, industrial optimization, environmental friendliness, and ecological harmony. Therefore, the policy recommendations are given as follows:
1) Promote industrial transformation. RBCs should exploit their comparative and late-mover advantages to cultivate leading industries (Zhang et al., 2021), especially high-tech equipment manufacturing and other new industries with low environmental pressure and high added value. Table 3 compares the industrial development characteristics of the four types of RBCs and gives the suggested directions for the pillar industries after the transformation of the each type of city. More details are able to be found in the Supplementary Materials.
Subsequently, we propose development suggestions for each type of RBC. The transformation of pillar industries in growing resource cities has abundant resource advantages but is constrained by factors such as low resource utilization efficiency and economic efficiency. Take Songwon City as an example, its original pillar industries are petroleum, oil and gas extraction and chemical industry, respectively. Therefore, the city’s transformed pillar industries should be related to petroleum resources, so that the added value of the pillar industries can be increased significantly and its sustainable development capacity can be enhanced.
Mature resource cities inherit a better economic foundation but are constrained by factors such as technology, talent, capital, and lack of innovation. We suggest that the transformed pillar industries should develop toward increasing the added value of resource industries or further expanding different types of industries. Taking Yanbian as an example, we suggest that the city should inherit the traditional advantageous industries such as coal mining and forestry while reforming towards energy and hydropower, forest products processing, garment and textile, and information and electronics industries.
Industrial transformation in recession resource cities is slow and difficult. Besides, it is difficult to find suitable successor industries. In Yichun, for example, we suggest that the city should develop in the direction of broadening the industrial chain based on the development of forestry, and further introduce the “1 + 1″ model to explore forestry-related fields, such as wood processing, forest food processing industry, forest ecotourism, etc.
Regenerative resource cities can gradually get rid of their dependence on resources by improving the level of industrial science and technology innovation, but they are often constrained by the low level of high technology and the general ability of science and technology innovation. Taking Panjin as an example, we suggest that the city, on the basis of inheriting the original petrochemical industry, further develop in the direction of material finishing and actively expand the petrochemical and fine chemical industry, oil and gas equipment manufacturing, plastic new materials, marine engineering, and other related industries. In order to achieve this, talent acquisition (Yu and Cheng, 2016; Yang et al., 2019) is a good way.
2) Consider environmental protection. Considering the severe pressure on ecological environment protection in Northeast China, we think the following three aspects are needed to integrate sustainable development into urban transformation.
The first is to strengthen ecological protection and restoration. For example, the ecological damage and environmental pollution caused by mining should be well evaluated according to the mine ecological planning before mining. The mining scheme should follow the principle of minimizing environmental costs. During the mining process, it is necessary to meet the requirements of the mine ecological environment evaluation index and minimize environmental loss when implementing green mining in the whole process. The mining scheme should always ensure that the reliable implementation of the mine fits ecological environment standards. The predicted loss should compare with the actual loss after mining. As for the ecological damage and the environmental pollution loss caused by mineral resources exploitation, the relevant stakeholders should be compensated following the green property rights system. Meanwhile, the ecological environment of mines should be repaired by their functions and structures to maintain the ecological structure, resistance, self-recovery, and sustainable development ability of the mining areas, and thus guarantee the quality of environmental restoration.
Secondly, strengthen innovations for green mining technology, mainly including water-preserved mining technology, ecological restoration technology of mining wasteland, building and land protection technology, and clean mining technology. Specifically, the government should take the lead in building a technological alliance, extensively appeal to experts and scholars to solve enterprises’ problems in production, and improve the technical level with the goal of green and low carbon.
Thirdly, strengthening supervision can promote the intensive and comprehensive utilization of resources and develop a circular economy. Some valuable experiences of cases such as the Ruhr region in Germany can be referred to. Ruhr’s government strictly implements environmental regulations on air quality management, pollution source control, and emission treatments. Emission control is realized through national environmental protection legislation, economic policy tools such as subsidies and taxes, and industrial structure adjustment (Hassink and Shin, 2005).
3) Optimize the guiding policies. First, for state-owned assets in the Northeast, there is an urgent need to establish a more optimal and equitable management system, optimize the separation of social and operational functions, and implement the main responsibility for safety management. In this process, using modern management theories, information technologies, and supervision measures can promote the proper operation of the economy of state-owned enterprises under the current laws and regulations. These measures can effectively avoid the loss of state-owned assets in economic transformation and strengthen the public’s awareness of supervision and willingness to participate, thus forming a good atmosphere for economic development.
Secondly, for environmental protection, governments at all levels should strictly implement laws and regulations on environmental protection and strengthen inspection measures while following the basic management principle of “whoever develops, whoever recovers”. It is important to encourage private capital to participate in environmental protection, and ecological restoration according to local conditions. In addition, governments should constantly innovate new ecological restoration models and strictly implement environmental protection responsibility.
Thirdly, the governments should actively build a cooperation platform to deepen the exchange between Northeast China and other domestic and foreign regions. It should make full use of location superiority, implement the opening-up strategy, and establish a strategic partnership of sharing resources and achievements. Moreover, the governments should expand the industrial development space and deepen the integrated development of external resource elements and dominant industries.
Fourthly, the local governments should persist in adopting specific policies for each city, enterprise, and mineral to develop and utilize resources by considering the local conditions and thus enhance the resource support capacity. After introducing relevant policies, the government should introduce corresponding supporting measures to help loss-making enterprises out of their current predicament. For enterprises with overcapacity, it is necessary to reduce overproduction. The local government needs to take decisive measures to shut down the enterprises characterized by either inefficiency, high consumption, or low development. At the same time, more attention should be paid to properly handling the exit of zombie enterprises and arranging the transfer of a large number of surplus labor.
Conclusion
This article mainly studies RBCs’ problems and their development countermeasures.
1) RBCs in Northeast China have the standard features of global RBCs and the local particularities. More precisely, the common problems refer to economic-related problems, such as the single industrial structure and the low development of substitute industries (Yu and Cheng, 2016). Particularity refers to the environmental issues caused by exploiting natural resources in Northeast China, including industrial pollution, soil erosion (Tan J. et al., 2017), landslides, ground subsidence (Yu and Cheng, 2016).
2) The challenges faced by RBCs in Northeast China are closely related to their development realities and policy systems. Two of the reasons cannot be ignored. On the one hand, the management policies in the Northeast have brought these cities problems of population exodus, environmental damage, and slow economic growth. On the other hand, the characteristics of RBCs lead to a very difficult transformation of the predominantly mature and declining Northeast China.
3) Based on the plight of RBCs in Northeast China, this paper proposes practical policy recommendations from three perspectives: promoting industrial transformation, considering environmental protection and optimizing the guiding policies.
Compared to former studies, we followed the literature such by Heidenreich (2015), Jawadi and Fitti. (2019), Omolade et al. (2019), Nel and Connelly. (2020), John and Tasciotti. (2020), Ogbonna et al. (2020), and Zhang J. et al. (2022) by adopting the method of the case study. However, compared with previous studies, the contribution of this paper is to supplement the solution of how to solve the common and individual issues faced by RBCs. At the same time, compared with the studies of Reid and Gartrell. (2013), and Mitchell and O’Neill. (2016), our contribution derives from analyzing the possible impact of the severe environmental issues faced by RBCs on the follow-up policies and accordingly putting forward targeted measures to guide various RBCs in developing countries, to achieve sustainable development, just like Sunikka (2006), Liu and Gallagher (2010), Omer (2008) and OECD economic surveys European Union 2009, 2009.
Finally, this paper does not explain why both economic transformation and environmental protection in RBCs in China are still in the exploratory stage, but objectively discusses the current development dilemma of RBCs in Northeast China.
Therefore, in future research, it is necessary to discuss how to combine economic transformation and environmental protection (Yang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021), to be able to predict the future trends of RBCs in China from multiple perspectives. In addition to this, we believe that similar to Wei et al. (2022), how to reasonably plan the future resource development of RBCs with an ambitious carbon neutrality target is also a worthy research direction for the future.
Author contributions
YQ led the whole design of the manuscript. WG: editing. GC: Writing-Review. YQ wrote the initial drafts. XN and HW: revision. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided comments and feedback.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71973038 and 71763001) supported this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.998754/full#supplementary-material
References
Chen, W., Shen, Y., and Wang, Y. N. (2018). Evaluation of economic transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities in Shaanxi province based on an improved TOPSIS method. Sustain. Cities Soc. 37, 232–240. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.019
China Bureau of Statistics (2019). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2019/indexeh.htm.
Fong, W. K., Matsumot, H., and Ho, C. S. (2008). Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission considerations in the urban planning process in Malaysia. Plan. Malays. 6 (6), 101–130. doi:10.21837/pmjournal.v6.i1.68
Guo, Y. (2021). Financial Development and Carbon Emissions: Analyzing the Role of Financial Risk, Renewable Energy Electricity, and Human Capital for China. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2021, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2021/1025669
Hassink, R., and Shin, D.-H. (2005). The restructuring of old industrial areas in Europe and Asia. Environ. Plan. A 37 (4), 571–580. doi:10.1068/a36273
He, J., Zhou, T., and Wu, D. (2017). Shrinking cities and resource-based economy: The economic restructuring in China’s mining cities. Cities 60, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.009
Heidenreich, M. (2015). The new museum folkwang in essen. A contribution to the cultural and economic regeneration of the Ruhr area? Eur. Plan. Stud. 23 (8), 1529–1547. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.817545
Hou, Y., Long, R., Chen, H., and Zhang, L. (2018). Research on the sustainable development of China’s coal cities based on lock-in effect. Resour. Policy 59, 479–486. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.09.002
Jawadi, F., and Ftiti, Z. (2019). Oil price collapse and challenges to economic transformation of Saudi arabia: A time-series analysis. Energy Econ. 80, 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.003
Jilin provincial government (2020). Soil and water loss in Jilin Province continues to improve. AvaliableAt: http://slt.jl.gov.cn/zhuanti/shgysldd/swrfz/202009/t20200910_7471937.html.
Jilin provincial government (2016). The transformation and development of Liaoyuan City presents positive changes. AvaliableAt: http://www.jl.gov.cn/zw/yw/zwlb/sx/sz/201602/t20160204_6636919. html.
John, E., and Tasciotti, L. (2020). Is there a resource curse in timor-leste? A critical review of recent evidence. Dev. Stud. Res. 7 (1), 141–152. doi:10.1080/21665095.2020.1816189
Krueger, A. B., and Grossman, G. M. (1991). Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. NBER 3914, 1–57. doi:10.3386/w3914
Li, B., and Dewan, H. (2017). Efficiency differences among China's resource-based cities and their determinants. Resour. Policy 51, 3–38. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.11.003
Li, H., Long, R., and Chen, H. (2013). Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts. Energy Policy 55 (249), 251–260. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.007
Li, Z., Marinova, D., Guo, X., and Gao, Y. (2015). Evaluating pillar industry’s transformation capability: A case study of two Chinese steel-based cities. PLoS One 10 (9), e0139576. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139576
Liao, Q., Li, P., Roosli, R. B., Liu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., et al. (2022). Carbon emission characteristics of resource-based cities in China. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 1, 13. doi:10.1007/s40996-022-00876-z
Liu, H., and Gallagher, K. S. (2010). Catalyzing strategic transformation to a low-carbon economy: A CCS roadmap for China. Energy Policy 38 (1), 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.063
Ma, A., Ji, J., and Khayatnezhad, M. (2021). Risk-constrained non-probabilistic scheduling of coordinated power-to-gas conversion facility and natural gas storage in power and gas based energy systems. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 26, 100478. doi:10.1016/j.segan.2021.100478
Mak, B. (2008). The future of the State-owned hotels in China: Stay or go? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 27 (3), 355–367. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.10.003
Mitchell, C. J. A., and O’Neill, K. (2016). Tracing economic transition in the mine towns of northern Ontario: An application of the “resource-dependency model. Can. Geogr. 60 (1), 91–106. doi:10.1111/cag.12238
Nel, E., and Connelly, S. (2020). Regional economic transformation: Changing land and resource access on the West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island. Land Use Policy 93, 103947. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.008
OECD economic surveys European Union 2009 (2009). OECD economic surveys European Union. Paris: OECD.
Ogbonna, O. E., Mobosi, I. A., and Ugwuoke, O. W. (2020). Economic growth in an oil-dominant economy of Nigeria: The role of financial system development. Cogent Econ. Finance 8 (1), 1810390. doi:10.1080/23322039.2020.1810390
Omer, A. M. (2008). Focus on low carbon technologies: The positive solution. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 12 (9), 2331–2357. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.015
Omolade, A., Ngalawa, H., and Kutu, A. (2019). Crude oil price shocks and macroeconomic performance in Africa’s oil-producing countries. Cogent Econ. Finance 7 (1), 1607431. doi:10.1080/23322039.2019.1607431
Reid, A., and Gatrell, J. D. (2013). Resource geographies & economic development: Understanding place-based industries in a global economy. Appl. Geogr. (Sevenoaks) 45, 363–364. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.021
Ruan, L., Yang, L., and Wang, D. (2020). The complexity for the resource-based cities in China on creating sustainable development. Cities 97, 102571. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102571
Sachs, J. D., and Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. Eur. Econ. Rev. 45 (4), 827–838. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8
State Council (2013). National sustainable development plan for resource-based cities (2013–2020). AvaliableAt: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-12/03/content_2540070.htm.
Sun, Q., Lin, D., Khayatnezhad, M., and Taghavi, M. (2021a). Investigation of phosphoric acid fuel cell, linear fresnel solar reflector and organic rankine cycle polygeneration energy system in different climatic conditions. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 147 (3), 993–1008. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.035
Sun, X., Zhang, H., Ahmad, M., and Xue, C. (2021b). Analysis of influencing factors of carbon emissions in resource-based cities in the Yellow River basin under carbon neutrality target. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29 (16), 23847–23860. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17386-6
Sunikka, M. (2006). Energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies in urban renewal. Build. Res. Inf. Int. J. Res. Dev. Demonstration 34 (6), 521–533. doi:10.1080/09613210600660976
Tan, J., Lo, K., Qiu, F., Liu, W., Li, J., and Zhang, P. (2017a). Regional economic resilience: Resistance and recoverability of resource-based cities during economic crises in Northeast China. Sustainability 9 (12), 2136. doi:10.3390/su9122136
Tan, J., Lo, K., Qiu, F., Zhang, X., and Zhao, H. (2020). Regional economic resilience of resource‐based cities and influential factors during economic crises in China. Growth Change 51 (1), 362–381. doi:10.1111/grow.12352
Tan, J., Zhang, P., Lo, K., Li, J., and Liu, S. (2017b). Conceptualizing and measuring economic resilience of resource-based cities: case study of Northeast China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 27 (3), 471–481. doi:10.1007/s11769-017-0878-6
Wang, D., Shi, Y., and Wan, K. (2020a). Integrated evaluation of the carrying capacities of mineral resource-based cities considering synergy between subsystems. Ecol. Indic. 108, 105701. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105701
Wang, C., Zhan, J., and Xin, Z. (2020b). Comparative analysis of urban ecological management models incorporating low-carbon transformation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 159, 120190. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120190
Wei, Z., Geng, Y., Jiang, M., Chen, Z., and Wu, W. (2022). Toward carbon neutrality: Uncovering constraints on critical minerals in the Chinese power system. Fundam. Res. 2 (3), 367–374. doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.006
Wiedensohler, A., Cheng, Y. F., Nowak, A., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Berghof, M., et al. (2009). Rapid aerosol particle growth and increase of cloud condensation nucleus activity by secondary aerosol formation and condensation: A case study for regional air pollution in northeastern China. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (D2), D00G08. doi:10.1029/2008JD010884
Xia, D., Qi, Y., Shao, S., Zhou, Y., and Shan, Y. (2021). The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network dea approach. Energy Econ. 101, 105408. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105408
Yan, D., Ye, B., Shi, Y., and Zeng, X. (2019). Spatial variation of energy efficiency based on a Super-Slack-Based Measure: Evidence from 104 resource-based cities. J. Clean. Prod. 240, 117669. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117669
Yang, J., Wang, Y., Mao, J., and Wang, D. (2022). Exploring the dilemma and influencing factors of ecological transformation of resource-based cities in China: Perspective on a tripartite evolutionary game. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29, 41386–41408. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-18450-x
Yang, K., Zhang, S., Luo, Y., Xu, Q., and Qu, L. (2018). The widening urbanization gap between the Three Northeast Provinces and the Yangtze River Delta under China’s economic reform from 1984 to 2014. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 25 (3), 262–275. doi:10.1080/13504509.2017.1400478
Yang, M. X., Yu, I. Y., Zeng, K. J., and Sun, J. (2019). Environmentally sustainable or economically sustainable? The effect of Chinese manufacturing firms’ corporate sustainable strategy on their green performances. Bus. Strategy Environ. 28 (6), 989–997. doi:10.1002/bse.2296
Yu, M., and Cheng, B. (2016). Getting depleted resource-based cities back on their feet again – The example of Yichun in China. J. Clean. Prod. 134, 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.101
Zhang, F., Zhang, J., and Wang, Z. (2021). Fluctuation in the transformation of economic development and the coupling mechanism with the environmental quality of resource-based cities –A case study of Northeast China. Resour. Policy 72, 102128. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102128
Zhang, H., Sun, X., Bi, C., Ahmad, M., and Wang, J. (2022b). Can sustainable development policy reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from resource-based cities in China. Sci. Total Environ. 838, 156341. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156341
Zhang, J., Khayatnezhad, M., and Ghadimi, N. (2022c). Optimal model evaluation of the proton-exchange membrane fuel cells based on deep learning and modified African Vulture Optimization Algorithm. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Util. Environ. Eff. 44 (1), 287–305. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2043956
Zhang, M., Yan, T., and Ren, Q. (2022a). Does innovative development drive green economic growth in resource-based cities? Evidence from China. Front. Environ. Sci. 9, 745498. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.745498
Zheng, H., and Ge, L. (2022). Carbon emissions reduction effects of sustainable development policy in resource-based cities from the perspective of resource dependence: Theory and Chinese experience. Resour. Policy 78, 102799. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102799
Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, X., and Chang, D. (2022). Does the transformation of resource-dependent cities promote the realization of the carbon-peaking goal? An analysis based on typical resource-dependent city clusters in China. J. Clean. Prod. 365, 132731. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132731
Keywords: resource-based cities, sustainable development, northeast China, environmental dilemmas, green transformation
Citation: Qing Y, Guo W, Cao G, Qin Y, Nie X and Wang H (2022) Environmental dilemma and sustainable development of resource-based cities: A case study from northeast china. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:998754. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.998754
Received: 20 July 2022; Accepted: 22 August 2022;
Published: 12 September 2022.
Edited by:
Wendong Wei, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaCopyright © 2022 Qing, Guo, Cao, Qin, Nie and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xin Nie, toefl678@163.com; Han Wang, hanwang@gxu.edu.cn