Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan
Qiannan Zhang1
Vikas Khare
Alexey Mikhaylov
Gabor Pinter- 1School of Economics, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, China
- 2School of Technology, Management and Engineering, NMIMS, Indore, India
- 3Department of Banking and Financial Markets, Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- 4University Center for Circular Economy, University of Pannonia, Nagykanizsa, Hungary
An efficient use of energy is the pre-condition for economic development. But excessive use of fossil fuel harms the environment. As renewable energy emits no or low greenhouse gases, more countries are trying to increase the use of energies from renewable sources. At the same time, no matter developed or developing, nations have to maintain economic growth. By collecting SCI/SSCI indexed peer-reviewed journal articles, this article systematically reviews the consumption nexus of renewable energy and economic growth. A total of 46 articles have been reviewed following the PRISMA guidelines from 2010 to 2021. Our review research shows that renewable energy does not hinder economic growth for both developing and developed countries, whereas, there is little significance of consuming renewable energy (threshold level) on economic growth for developed countries.
Introduction
Consuming non-renewable energy may produce output and foster economic development, but undoubtedly it is a significant source of carbon emission and environmental degradation (Awodumi and Adewuyi 2020). Using non-renewable energy sources put countries in a dilemma in policy priority between pollution reduction and economic growth. Thus, whether renewable or non-renewable, the energy should be used carefully and efficiently as its sources are limited. In addition, due to climate change and global warming situation, renewable energy could be the most attractive alternative to fossil fuel, reducing the CO2 emission process. However, introducing new renewable energy technologies, consuming, and making them available for the citizens, is very time-consuming and costly. On the other side, countries struggle to maintain economic growth and development. Due to the COVID-19 crisis, the situation has been worsening. The governments of both developing and developed nations have to balance spending for climate change mitigation and economic growth.
Moreover, there is still limited information regarding all the perceived critical factors in moving toward fully renewable energy sources. This article shows a comprehensive assessment of how renewable energy systems affect the country’s economic growth. In this article, assessment is carried out based on G7 and Next-11 countries. France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada make up the Group of Seven (G7) intergovernmental organization. Government officials from these nations meet regularly to discuss world economic and monetary matters, with each member alternating through the chairmanship.
Along with the BRICs, the Next-11 (or N-11) are eleven countries identified by Goldman Sachs as having a high potential to become the world’s largest economies in the twenty-first century, namely, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam. Figure 1 shows the name of G7 and Next-11 countries.
FIGURE 1. (Group Seven) G7 and (Next-11) N-11 countries.
Energy resource has been the fundamental element for an economy or economic development (Xiong et al., 2014). It is clear that economic growth mainly depends on energy consumption, which is highly responsible for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly CO2, as stated by Gabr and Mohamed (2020). CO2 emissions are a by-product generated by primary consumption sources of non-renewable energy, such as fossil fuels (Thollander et al., 2007). Starting from this general environmental framework due to non-renewable sources, several national economies, after having experienced several disasters, have tried to bring about a structural change in production methods and energy use. Some countries have mainly switched to renewable sources, leaving fossil fuels to no longer be based on non-renewable energy sources (Irfan et al., 2021). According to the EY Company’s Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI), which integrates new global trends, the countries with the most significant opportunities for investments in renewables are the United States, China, and India, three large economies that have been competing for these positions for several years now (RECAI, 2020). Implementing renewable energy sources (RES) is essential but still faces some challenges in some European countries. Perception and awareness toward RES are the main challenges in countries such as Montenegro (Djurisic et al., 2020).
One of the world’s major power resource user countries, China, has put forward the “double carbon” target to reduce emissions (Jiang et al., 2022). China’s domestic market has shown some resilience despite the end of domestic subsidies in December 2020 and the COVID-19 crisis, which affected 10% of new capacity additions. Chinese solar panel production grew by 15.7% compared to 2019 (RECAI, 2020). Australia represents the third, this country has experienced exponential growth in residential photovoltaics, distributing over 10 GW of solar energy to civilian homes and adopting necessary plans to export hydrogen to Asia (RECAI, 2020). India follows, from 7th to 4th place, and thanks to the growth of photovoltaic capacity to meet the ambitious national green goals for 2030 (RECAI, 2020). In addition to G7 and N-11 countries, Table 1 shows the general information and technology-specific scores of the top 10 countries that invest in renewable energy sources, and Figure 2 shows the data visualization of the dataset in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Top 10 countries that invest in renewable sources.
FIGURE 2. Comparison of technology-specific score of top 10 countries.
Some studies tried to relate the consumption of renewable energy and economic growth. But most of the studies concern EU countries and other factors. For example Tutak and Brodny.(2022) have tried to analyze the impact of renewable energy on economics, environmental, and conventional energy sources. In addition, (Smolović et al., 2020), by using the pooled mean group (PMG) estimator in a dynamic panel setting (an ARDL model) has carried out a nexus between renewable energy consumption and economic growth in the traditional and new member states of the EU. Furthermore, the panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model (Koengkan, Fuinhas, and Marques 2019) has examined the relationship between financial openness, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 12 Latin American countries. Furthermore Lorente et al. (2022) found that there is an association between economic complexity and CO2 emissions is inverted-U and further N-shaped relationship for Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain.
We have noticed a research gap of systematic review analysis regarding economic growth and renewable energy consumption in recent years by analyzing other existing research work. From this point of view, our study tried to fill the research gap and make it a collection of systematic reviews in this field. Moreover, there were no such systematic reviews (including developing, developed, and underdeveloped countries) in this field of study.
Due to the higher cost of implementing and maintaining, cost-benefit analysis, and other external–internal factors, renewable energy is still under consideration to entirely depend on the energy source. Thus, this is a burning question for the researchers, policy makers, and related organizations whether introducing the renewable energy source would hinder or slow down the economic growth. Many researchers are trying to answer for their respective country or region of interest. No such review work tried to find the nexus between RE and EG for G7 and N-11 countries. This study attempted to gather the related research outcomes and give a broader picture of introducing and using the renewable energy and economic growth relationship.
Basic Interpretation With Renewable Energy and Economic Growth
Introducing renewable energy and economic growth is a widespread debate among researchers. From this point of view, by executing the panel data (1970–2017) (Konuk et al., 2021, 11), examined the relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption for N-11 countries. According to their research work, economic development and biomass energy consumption act together in the long run. In addition, Jenniches (2018) tried to assess the regional economic impacts of a transition to renewable energy generation in his review article. He believes clearly that defining technologies and assessment periods is very significant. Doytch and Narayan (2021) estimated the effects of non-renewable and renewable energy consumption on manufacturing and services growth. They have found that renewable energy enhances growth in high-growth sectors, that is, the services sector in high-income economies and the manufacturing sector in middle-income economies. Acheampong et al. (2021) investigated the causal relationship between renewable energy, CO2 emission, and economic growth for 45 African (sub-Saharan) countries over 57 years (1960–2017). Using the GMM-PVAR method, they have concluded that a bidirectional causal relationship exists between economic growth and renewable energy (Acheampong, Dzator, and Savage 2021). Another old study (comparatively) in 2003 by Ugur and Sari examined the causality relationship between the two series in the top 10 emerging economies and G7 countries. They have discovered bi-directional causality for Argentina, GDP to energy consumption causality for Korea and Italy, energy and consumption to GDP for Turkey, France, Germany, and Japan. Additionally, it was found that countries such as Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela have low renewable energy participation in their energy mix. An effect between renewable energy consumption and fossil fuels, as a possible response to periods of scarcity in reservoirs, was detected for these countries (Koengkan et al., 2020b).
In contrast, economic growth may slow down due to energy conservation in the case of the rest four nations (Soytas and Sari, 2003). Another estimation suggested that non-renewable energy consumption has a significant and positive impact on economic activities and development across a large number of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (Ivanovski, Hailemariam, and Smyth 2021). A review of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) in developing countries has been conducted by Zebra et al. (2021). They believe Asian developing countries perform better than African nations for renewable and non-renewable mini-grids maintenance and productivity. They also believe that, in general, the costs of mini-grids will continue to decline, making renewable sources even more competitive at the utility scale. Some researchers also tried to find the opposite relationship between economic growth (barriers) and renewable energy development. Seetharaman et al. (2019) believe technological, social, and regulatory barriers hinder the development of RE development, but economic constraints do not directly impact the outcome of renewable energy.
In some countries, renewable energy and consumption do not hinder economic development, and on the other side, it plays a vital role in hindering economic development. So, according to Islam et al. (2022), income growth shows positive and negative effects on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Consider that domestic and foreign investments positively affect renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Furthermore, institutional quality has a positive impact on renewable energy consumption. Instead, the urbanization process has a negative impact on the consumption of renewable energy because it has a positive influence on the consumption of non-renewable energy (Islam et al., 2022).
Unfortunately, despite the revolutionary attempt to adopt renewable energy technologies, some industrial countries are still firm on the consumption of fossil fuels energies with the aim of recording faster and more impressive economic growth (Shrinkhal, 2019; Islam et al., 2021). Contrary to the positive effects on the environment generated with renewable energy sources, the economic serenity that can be reached using non-renewable enriches the coffers of different economies and the lifestyles of their people, but not those of the environment (Doytch and Narayan, 2016). In some cases, renewable energy consumption (threshold level) does not significantly affect economic growth for developed countries. Renewable energy (RE) and economic development indicators may not correlate in selected EU countries. Despite some debate and unstable economic conditions, the share of RE in total energy consumption in EU countries has been systematically growing and was not much dependent on economic factors (Ogonowski 2021). The economic value of solely replacing renewable energy with nuclear power and fossil energy could be very high and infeasible. They consider that electricity and power generation based on only renewable energy would cost an additional 35 trillion KRW/year for South Korea (Park et al., 2016). This method is infeasible, and customer willingness to pay will be low. Lema et al. (2021) by taking in-depth analysis, tried to measure to what extent direct and indirect economic benefits are created when Chinese investments in RE projects in sub-Saharan Africa. Their research revealed that the FDI and investments on RE projects might have “bounded economic benefits” for the region by creating new job opportunities, production and training activities, linkage with local systems, and so on. In addition, economic awareness, public opinion, and mass participation are essential for the use of RE in the region. Citizens of Kenya (73%) (both urban and rural) strongly approved the development of RE sources technologies and (91%) believe that RE technologies will reduce the cost of electricity and power generation (Oluoch et al., 2020).
Methodology Used in Review Assessment
We have considered Group seven (G7: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and the United States), countries (as developed nations and the Next-11 (N- 11: Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam) countries (exclude South Korea) as developing countries.
To maintain the whole process, we have followed the PRISMA flowchart explained in Figure 3:
FIGURE 3. PRISMA flow diagram.
The PRISMA method—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes—built a set of minimum elements based on the references highlighted in the systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The primary purpose of PRISMA is to focus primarily on studies that evaluate the effects of certain interventions. However, they can also be used to report systematic reviews that present with different objectives (e.g., from the evaluation of interventions) (Prisma, 2021).
For this purpose, PRISMA was used because it is helpful for the critical evaluation of the published systematic reviews of this study, although it is not a tool for assessing the quality of a systematic review. For the main results of the literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines, we have considered the available online date for the “Year” column. We have followed the MLA style for the author’s name. The applied and references related theories are in the “Theories” column. Authors’ article methodologies are considered in the “Methods” column. The author’s near-future predictions or consequences are listed in the “Predictors” column. The results, conclusions, or outcomes are in the “Outcomes” column, followed by article keywords in the “Keywords” section. We have used google scholar citation for the citation column until the last week of December 2021. The citation number may vary as the citations are increasing every day. The last column is “Journal,” which denotes the respective article published journal name.
We have used Google Scholar, Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed for research articles. Initially, we searched the articles using the keywords “Renewable energy” and “Economic growth.” We have 553 articles related to good governance and sustainable tourism mentioned in the article’s title. There were 17 duplicate articles that we had to remove. We deducted the articles unrelated to the topic content from this initial screening. After removing the irrelevant articles, we had 97 full-text eligible articles. From these 97 articles, we have selected 46 closely matched full-text articles for review (Figure 3).
Effect of Renewable Energy in Economic Growth G7 Countries
While presenting economic prosperity, the G7 countries can still not guarantee environmental well-being. In fact, using the annual frequency data from 1980 to 2016, the impact on the environment of some variables was ascertained using panel data. The results show that financial globalization and eco-innovation reduce the ecological footprint. On the contrary, urbanization stimulates environmental degradation by increasing the ecological footprint values (Ahmad et al., 2021).
Amri (2017), using the dynamic simultaneous-equation panel data approach, investigated, over the period 1990–2012, the relationship between three indicators (economic growth, renewable energy, and trade) in different income groups of countries and underlined the interdependence of these variables. Notably, the main findings reveal a bidirectional nexus between renewable energy consumption and GDP in all groups of nations; a persistent bidirectional relationship among foreign trade and renewable energies in all groups of countries; finally, a bidirectional nexus between trade and economic growth in developed, developing, and others developed countries. In addition, a team of researchers investigated the dynamic effect of RE consumption, biocapacity, and economic growth in the United States from 1985 to 2014. Using the ARDL model, the authors claim that a decline in environmental degradation can attribute to an increase in RE consumption through its negative effect on the ecological footprint. Their study revealed that biocapacity and economic growth would exert more pressure on the ecological footprint. Furthermore, a causal relationship was built between ecological footprint and economic growth and economic growth and biocapacity (Usman, Alola, and Sarkodie 2020).
Armeanu et al. (2021), investigated, using several statistical methods, the interrelationships, over the period 1990–2014, among renewable energy, types of energy, economic growth, CO2 emissions, and urbanization in different income groups of countries, and highlighted that “In the case of the group of countries with a high level of income, the presence of the co-integration of the renewable energy use with the carbon releases, renewable and nuclear energy, electric power consumption, and the urban population was observed” and the relationship was satisfied, due to the interest of this group of countries to preserve the environment. Furthermore, through the Granger causality test, the authors find a single-bidirectional causal relationship between economic growth and energy intensity in the low-income countries, whereas many bidirectional relations among the variables in high-income countries, particularly between energy intensity and CO2 emissions.
Another study was conducted by Hao et al. (2021) to investigate the effects of green growth on CO2 emissions for G7 countries over the past twenty-five years, using second-generation panel data methods, for example, the distributive self-regressive-augmented transversal lag model (CSARDL). The results revealed that both short- and long-term GDP growth impact environmental impoverishment. Thus, the thesis that green growth supports the quality of the environment is confirmed. The authors highlighted that any changes in CO2, GDP, green growth (GG), environmental taxes (ET), renewable energy consumption (REC), and human capital (HC) in one of the G7 countries would have consequences in other G7 countries in an interconnected nexus between G7 countries.
However, at the regional level, total energy consumption positively affects growth, while renewable sources negatively affect development in some regions in low- and middle-income countries (Namahoro et al., 2021a). Instead of testing the relationships among variables with appropriate and feasible econometrics modeling techniques, using panel data methodologies, Li and Leung (2021) evaluated the relationship between energy prices, economic growth, and renewable energy consumption. The results of Li and Lung’s study (2021) highlighted the importance of economic growth in supporting renewable energy consumption, especially in G7 countries with developed economies. However, factors that are affected through renewable energy systems are listed in Table 2. By focusing on R&D spending and uniform policies, the G7 countries have transformed their economies from copying countries to a community of dynamic economies. As a result, and in tandem with the economy’s digitalization. This study examines the relationship between energy, financial, environmental sustainability, and social performance of G7 countries using a data envelopment analysis (DEA)-like composite score. The foundation of this study is formed over the reconstruction and modification of regional emissions and examining aspects such as energy, efficiency, and usage, in addition to the prospect of having a regional development outline. Most prior research used certain essential methodologies to examine emission levels and variance depending on actors connected to energy efficiency, energy structure, financial development, production, industry, technological development openness, and population.
TABLE 2. Factor that effected through the renewable energy system.
Namahoro et al. (2021b) underlined that renewable energy consumption affects economic growth, using an asymmetric analysis with a non-linear autoregressive-distributed lagged model (NARDL) and causality test. In contrast, Wang and Wang (2020) reveal that in the G7 countries, renewable energy consumption positively affects economic growth. The threshold value changes influence in this positive relationship. Thus, the role of growing renewable energy use to stimulate economic growth is non-linear. For example, if the EU countries increase their renewable energy over a threshold value, the position of renewable energy in supporting economic development is more significant. In the same line, in 2020, Chen et al. (2020) studied the causal link between renewable energy consumption and economic growth using a threshold model. The reference period is 1995–2015, and they confirm that renewable energies positively and significantly affect the economic growth in the OECD countries, whereas no significant effect is in the developed countries. The authors underlined that in developing and non-OECD countries, renewable energies significantly affect economic growth over a certain threshold of their consumption. In addition, Yang et al. (2021) found feed-in-tarrif (FIT) have higher expected output and profit, and lower market prices. The risks of production and gain is of relatively more significant. By contrast, the production and profit of renewable portfolio standard (RPS) remain relatively more stable. In the same year, Sharma et al. (2021) examined the interrelationships between sustainability indicators and financial growth performance, using Arellano–Bond dynamic panel data estimation, system dynamic panel data estimation, and the augmented mean group model. The results highlighted that the transition toward renewable energy is economically in the long run, positively impacting economic growth in line with the environment. From this point of view, total investment in RE and descriptive statistics with technological specific scores by G7 countries are listed in Tables 3, 4, respectively. Table 3 shows the Renewable Energy Country Attractive Index of different countries, and according to the score it is found out in the USA the growth or electricity generation through the renewable energy in the wonderful way. Overall data also shows the growth rate of the onshore wind energy systems, solar PV, solar CSP, geothermal systems are better in the United States; on the other hand, the offshore wind energy system and biomass systems are popular in the United Kingdom. The Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) rates the attractiveness of renewable energy investment and deployment prospects in the world’s top 40 markets. The rankings reflect our evaluations of market attractiveness and worldwide market trends. Table 4 describes the different statistical parameters with central tendency in terms of mean, mode, and median of renewable energy sources. It also finds most of the energy sources are minimum RECAI for Canada and maximum for the United States.
TABLE 3. G 7 countries that invest in renewable sources.
TABLE 4. Descriptive statistics with technological specific scores of G7 countries.
In Figure 4, we have listed the comparative technology-specific scores in various factors among G7 countries.
FIGURE 4. Comparison of technology-specific score of G7 countries. Data source: author elaboration.
There are also different phenomena in energy sector resources, capacity, and different level scales may have different outcomes. There is a possibility of reducing energy and resource consumption and to advance degrowth-related ideals of energy local production at local and small-scale energy systems in Spain and Greece (Tsagkari, Roca, and Kallis 2021). The authors summarize that despite the degrowth potential of these local energy projects, their prospects are limited to revitalizing local economies and empowering local communities. The summary results of the literature review regarding G7 countries are listed in Table 5.
TABLE 5. Main results of literature review according to PRISMA guidelines of G7 countries.
Effect of Renewable Energy in Economic Growth Next-11 Countries
Rural people in impoverished and developing nations lack access to electricity that is dependable, economical, and long-lasting. Even though these countries have limited renewable energy sources, many urban and rural people rely on kerosene, diesel, and other fossil fuels to meet their energy needs. The renewable energy capacity in the Next-11 nations is shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6. Renewable energy capacity in 11 countries.
The Bangladesh’s energy sector remains deficient, impeding the country’s smooth economic activity, and progress. For greening growth and meeting sustainable development goals (SDGs), increasing the amount of renewable energy in the energy resources mix and reducing and reducing the material consumption utilized for energy generation is critical (Baniya, Giurco, and Kelly 2021). The government attempts to close the gap between supply and demand for electricity by installing short-term power plants, coal-fired power plants, and importing from neighboring nations. However, the country still has a long way to produce and supply enough power. Furthermore, increased FDI inflows connected to energy limit the country’s extensive usage of renewable energy. At the same time, increased economic growth and CO2 emissions in the area, particularly in Bangladesh, stimulate the use of renewable energy (Murshed 2021). Another renewable energy source, tidal power, may play an essential part in the nation’s electrical supply by adding to it (Ahmad and Hasan 2021, 25). This will very certainly stimulate the industry and commercial activity along the shore. The answer may be alternatives to current energy sources, such as renewable energy resources. More renewable energy sources will be introduced and consumed, reducing energy scarcity, and promoting economic activity and growth (Bhuiyan, Mamur, and Begum 2021). Researchers such as Alam et al. (2017) proposed a one-way causal relationship between economic growth and overall energy demand (renewable and non-renewable). They claim that even a cautious approach to energy sources would not affect the country’s economy, but that because economic success leads to increased energy consumption, Bangladesh must pursue renewable energy and demand-side management (Alam, Ahmed, and Begum 2017). Nigeria, one of the NEXT-11 countries, is one of the Africa’s largest fossil fuel exporters. However, this country has recently experienced a significant energy problem. Biofuel has been identified as renewable energy (bioethanol and biodiesel) in recent years. Waste materials and feedstocks are widely available and accessible, potentially fueling Nigeria’s socio-economic progress (Adewuyi 2020). Islam et al. describe the economic effect of renewable and non-renewable energy systems. The dynamic simulations approach looks at the influence of income growth, foreign direct investment, domestic investment, urbanization, physical infrastructure, and institutional quality on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh from 1990 to 2019. According to empirical evidence, income growth positively and negatively impact renewable and non-renewable energy usage. Domestic investment has a favorable influence on renewable and non-renewable energy usage. It has been observed that foreign direct investment has a beneficial effect on renewable energy use. Although urbanization has a negative impact on renewable energy consumption, it positively impacts non-renewable energy consumption. Physical infrastructure has a positive and negative influence on renewable and non-renewable energy usage. Factor that effected through the renewable energy system on N-11 countries is listed in Table 7.
TABLE 7. Factor that effected through the renewable energy system on N-11 countries.
Ramadan et al. discuss the economic evaluation of new regulatory tariffs for renewables in Egypt. After 25 years of operation, the results show that adding a CAES system will increase the profitability of the Egyptian government’s new tariff for wind installations, with an NPV of $306 million compared to $207 million for a stand-alone wind system. Furthermore, the economic advantages rise if the government incentives for new renewable energy system installations or decreases financing rates. Ghouchani et al. investigate Iran’s renewable energy development potential. Three potential possibilities for the Iran’s renewable energy sector are examined in this report “long-term technology acquisition programs,” “policy stabilization,” and “attraction of international investment.” The findings indicated that renewable energy policy planning and implementation success is determined by selecting the most adaptive policies to national goals, technological capabilities, and economy. To swiftly and successfully develop and implement a comprehensive renewable energy plan, a thorough analysis of limits, impediments, available facilities and technologies, international sanctions, and foreign investment is essential. Sovacool et al. investigated and provided remedies to the likelihood of corruption in the Mexico’s renewable energy sector. The report then examines particular corruption risks in four nations (Mexico, Malaysia, Kenya, and South Africa) before offering five recommendations and solutions to help combat corruption. These approaches include corruption risk mapping, subsidy registries, sunset clauses, transparency initiatives, anti-corruption regulations, and shared ownership models. In the Economic Community of West African States’ renewable energy plan framework, Ozoegwe et al. examined Nigeria’s solar energy policy goals and tactics. This initiative is advised since the national solar energy strategy document lacks policies on encouraging the solar technology company in Nigeria. The proposals emphasized the requirements of the Renewable Energy Policy of the Economic Community of the West African States, which are currently in place. Case studies supported the recommendations for a community-shared business model for home end users and clusters of small companies in physical market places and an energy management contract business model for large organizations.
Ajayi et al. (2022) examined the influence of sustainable energy on national climate change, food security, and job opportunities in implications for Nigeria. It looked at international data on the links between energy and renewable energy adoption, national development, population growth, job creation, rural–urban integration, and the inherent benefits of renewable energy resources in mitigating climate change and global warming incidents. If Nigeria wants to continue economic growth, particularly in agriculture and food security, renewable energy for power generation must be included in the country’s rural development policy. It also shows that renewable energy can minimize its anthropogenic climate change contribution. From this point of view, total investment in RE and descriptive statistics with technological specific scores by N-11 countries are listed in Tables 8, 9, respectively. According to Table 8, RECAI of Egypt is maximum, and the growth rate of renewable energy in Egypt is also maximum. Table 8 also shows that the RECAI score of some of the countries in the offshore wind, such as Vietnam and geothermal in Egypt is minimal. The World Bank is putting out a long-term offshore wind roadmap for Turkey to issue a tender in the next 2 to 3 years. Following the cancellation of a 1.2 GW offshore wind auction in mid-2018, the World Bank is now in charge of disbursing EU money to support the feasibility and environmental studies in preparation for a second sale. Table 9 describes the different statistical parameters with central tendency in terms of mean, mode, and median of renewable energy sources. The 57th edition of our Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) demonstrates that there is a room for further renewable energy investment and strong demand for it. Institutional investors, in particular, have the ability and desire to offer massive, long-term capital injections required to support the fast-growing global renewable energy sector.
TABLE 8. Next-11 countries that invest in renewable sources.
TABLE 9. Descriptive statistics with technological specific scores of N-11 countries.
In Figure 5, we have listed the comparative technology-specific scores in various factors among N-11 countries.
FIGURE 5. Comparison of technology-specific score of N-11 countries.
The impact of renewable energy use on Nigeria’s environmental quality in several sectors was studied by Maji and his colleagues. The influence of renewable energy consumption on sectoral environmental quality is being examined in Nigeria as part of the government’s effectiveness. A regression analysis was used to estimate a dataset from 1989 to 2019. The per capita indicator, environmental quality indicators, and sectoral output from the agricultural, manufacturing, construction sectors, transportation, oil, residential, commercial, and public services sectors, and other sectors were examined. Adelaja et al. discussed the several barriers to national renewable energy adoption in Nigeria. Despite the privatization of Nigeria’s largest power utility company, the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN), the country’s electrical demand is rarely met. Nigeria’s electricity output has lately been reduced, despite a massive increase in demand.
To fill the hole, polluting electric generators, inefficient energy sources including candles, kerosene lamps, paraffin devices, and entire energy abstention have all been employed. These problems lead to missed commercial and economic prospects, low quality of life, and missed long-term development potential. Lin et al. looked at how Nigeria’s renewable energy program affected the country’s total output. Based on Nigeria’s Renewable Energy Program aims, this research asks three main questions, Is it possible for Nigeria’s economy to be built entirely on renewable energy? Is it feasible to replace non-renewable energy with renewable energy? What is renewable energy’s economic impact? This study focuses on the growth of renewable energy in Nigeria. We calculate, among other things, the economic effect, production elasticity, and substitution possibilities of renewable and non-renewable energy sources. Our findings, based on a dataset from 1980 to 2015 and analyzed using the translog production function, demonstrate that capital and labor are the key drivers of output in Nigeria; however, although being positive, the economic effect of renewable and non-renewable energy sources is negligible. Wang and Wang. (2020) studied the non-linear behavior of aggregated and disaggregated renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on GDP per capita in Pakistan. This research looked at how diverse forms of energy, such as renewables, fossil fuels, oil-based electrical generating, and hydroelectric power, impact Pakistan’s output. While using fossil fuels to boost economic growth may be beneficial in the early stages of production, it is not helpful in the later stages of production. According to the study, using clean energy, while not beneficial in the early stages of production in expanding production activities in Pakistan, is useful in the later stages of production, not only for production but also for the environment.
Mohamed et al. (2021) in Pakistan discussed the role of renewable energy in combating terrorism. This study looks at the relationship between terrorism, renewable energy, and fossil fuel consumption in Pakistan, taking into account several variables such as economic development and income disparity. Using the autoregressive-distributed lag testing technique, this study evaluated the long-term connection between the examined variables throughout the yearly period of 1980–2015. Their variables have long-term relationships, as shown by the Wald test. The summary results of the literature review regarding the Next-11 (N-11) countries are listed in Table 10.
TABLE 10. Main results of literature review according to PRISMA guidelines of Next-11 Countries.
Granger causality identifies the long-term bi-directional causal links between all variables. The research demonstrates short-term unidirectional causes between terrorism and fossil energy, GDP and renewable energy, and wealth disparity and fossil energy, even though there are bidirectional causal links between renewable energy and fossil energy in the near run. In reality, long-term statistics demonstrate that fossil fuels decrease terrorism while renewable energy increases it.
Wang and Wang (2020) studied renewable energy use, economic growth, and the human development index in Pakistan. This study examines the link between renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and the human development index in Pakistan from 1990 to 2014 using the two-stage least square approach. According to empirical research, using renewable energy does not improve Pakistan’s human development. Surprisingly, the lesser a country’s degree, the higher its income will be. CO2 emissions also contribute to the enhancement of the human development index. Furthermore, trade liberalization stifles Pakistan’s progress in terms of human development. Again, the long-term feedback idea between environmental influences and human development is supported by causality analysis.
Islam et al. (2022) demonstrate how renewable energy helps Pakistan prosper economically. The research aims to look at the link between renewable energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan, taking into account capital and labor as possible production function variables. In this work, the autoregressive-distributed lag (ARDL) model and the rolling window approach (RWA) were used to integrate data in a Pakistani scenario. Quarterly data from 1972Q1 to 2011Q4 were used in the study. Bertheau and his colleagues looked into it. A geospatial and techno–economic study for the Philippines was based on 100% renewable energy micro-grids. As a result, this study recommends a hybrid approach that combines geospatial analysis, cluster analysis, and energy system modeling: To begin, they identify islands that are not connected to the power grid. Second, cluster analysis is used to identify trends. Third, we perform simulations of energy systems employing solar, wind, and battery storage to generate 100% renewable energy systems. Our research will focus on 649 non-electrified islands with 650,000 people. These islands are grouped into four groups based on population and renewable resource availability. They determined that cost-optimized 100 percent renewable energy systems rely on solar and storage capacity for each cluster, with additional wind capacity. According to Doytch and Narayan (2021), renewable energy boosts economic growth. This study examines the influence of non-renewable and renewable energy consumption on economic development, distinguishing between manufacturing and service growth. Our empirical model is based on an endogenous growth framework with an increasing number of intermediate capital goods that comprise non-renewable and renewable energy inputs. We examine the impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy consumption on manufacturing and service growth, broken down by the type of usage (industrial, residential, and total final energy consumption) while accounting for well-known growth variables. Park and his colleagues looked at the procedures used by South Korean renewable energy cooperatives. This research focuses on citizen participatory RE co-ops as a vital niche in the community-led energy route. This study did a narrative analysis based on the RE co-ops’ present state and in-depth interviews. We examined key changes and inertia in the conventional energy system at the national, regional, and local levels by comparing within and across scales. Each scale was made up of a tangle of sub-regimes such as market, policy, and culture. We believe a niche may play a creative role in changing sub-regimes of various sizes based on resources that can be handled, such as money resources, rules, and connections. Sim J et al. looked at the economic and environmental benefits of R&D investment in the renewable energy sector in South Korea. The South Korean government has announced a strategy to invest in renewable energy to shift the country’s economy away from fossil fuels and toward renewables. This study assesses R&D investment in six types of renewable energy sources: biomass, waste, solar thermal energy, photovoltaic energy, marine energy, and wind power energy while taking into account several uncertainty factors such as the amount of renewable energy produced, R&D investment, unit price, and risk-free interest rate. According to Yurtkuran et al., agriculture, renewable energy generation, and globalization all influence CO2 emissions in Turkey. This study investigates the impact of agriculture, renewable energy production, and globalization on CO2 emissions in Turkey between 1970 and 2017. It uses the Gregory–Hansen integration test, bootstrap autoregressive-distributed lag (ARDL) approach, fully modified ordinary least squares, dynamic ordinary least squares, and long run estimators. The KOF indices for politics, society, and economics are explanatory variables. The Gregory–Hansen test and the bootstrap ARDL approach imply co-integration variables. In Turkey, Shan et al. investigated the role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in achieving carbon neutrality. A Granger causality test determines the causal relationship between green technology innovation, energy consumption, renewable energy, population, per capita income, and carbon dioxide emissions. Green technology innovation, renewable energy, energy consumption, population, per capita income, and carbon dioxide emissions are all co-integrated in the long run. Furthermore, while green technology innovation and renewable energy reduce carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, population, and per capita carbon emissions increase. Kul et al. evaluated the renewable energy investment risk factors for Turkey’s long-term development. This study uses a three-stage decision framework based on the multi-criteria decision methodology (MCDM) to assess and examine the risk factors of REIs in Turkey. The Delphi approach identifies REI risk factors in the first stage. The analytical hierarchy process is used in the second stage to examine the discovered REI risk factors (AHP). The third stage involves applying fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment to evaluate and prioritize methods for overcoming risk issues in REI projects (FWASPAS). The Delphi technique discovered six primary risk variables and 23 sub-risk factors. Economic and commercial risks emerged as prominent risk factors in AHP research. The energy plan for a new era of economic development in Vietnam was examined by Nong et al. (2020). The prospective implications of such a new power strategy in Vietnam are examined in this research by extending an economic electricity-detailed model. We found that, under a 2030 target scenario, the policy will lower the prices of both fossil- and renewable-based power by 40–78%, benefiting all sectors of the economy by allowing them to replace fossil fuels. Households benefit the most, as indicated by improvements in the per capita utility of 5.64–19.19%. Overall, the Vietnamese economy benefits greatly from the various scenarios, with real GDP increasing by 5.44–24.83%, significantly greater than the results in other countries. Nguyen et al. describe the economic potential of renewable energy in the Vietnam’s electrical industry. In a baseline scenario without renewables, coal provides 44% of total electricity generation from 2010 to 2030. Renewable energy has the potential to reduce that amount to 39%, as well as the sector’s overall CO2 emissions by 8%, SO2 by 3%, and NOx by 4%. Furthermore, renewables have the potential to avoid the construction of 4.4 GW of fossil fuel generating capacity, save local coal, and minimize coal and gas imports, therefore boosting energy independence and security. Omri et al. demonstrate how renewable energy helps offset the adverse effects of environmental issues on socio-economic well-being. The findings of this article demonstrate that 1) CO2 emissions have unconditionally adverse effects on human development and economic growth; 2) the net impact on human growth of the economy from the interaction among renewable power and carbon intensity are positive, that is, renewable energy reduces the impacts of per capita CO2 emissions on human development and economic growth; and 3) sustainable energy interacts with CO2 frequency and carbon intensity from liquid fuels.
Conclusion and Policy Implications
Global warming, environmental pollution, and other related issues are no more country-specific problems now. For power generation and carbon dioxide sequestration, the clean development mechanism involves the massive deployment of renewable energy technologies to promote the concept of sustainable development (Latake et al., 2015). In addition to the (greenhouse gas) GHG mitigating potential of renewable energy resources, the energy security guarantee is swiftly becoming a reality with the exploitation of different renewable energy resources. The clean development mechanism is a fundamental idea of the Kyoto Protocol under the canopy of the United Nations Framework on Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). However, it was envisaged that the industrialized nations would finance emission reduction mechanisms whereby the fund will be given to developing countries as sponsorship for renewable energy programs. To mitigate this problem, introducing more green technologies and renewable energy sources can be a solution. But, uncertainty, input–output cost analysis, higher production and maintenance cost, skill workforce, enough financial strengths, awareness etc., are only a few challenges toward mass sustainable energy development. Thus, in comparison of the effects of feed-in tariff (FIT) with a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) in the developing renewable energy industry uncertainty, FIT has higher expected output and profit and lower market prices. On the other hand, the production and profit of RPS remain relatively more stable. If the cost of renewable energy is high, the incentive effect of the policy under FIT seems better. As the price goes down, the incentive effect under RPS probably continues to rise. According to the aforementioned research, it is found out that the renewable energy sector plays a very vital role in the overall growth of the country. Developing a more renewable energy system is necessary for Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria.
Renewable energy and natural resources significantly reduce emissions (Usman and Lorente, 2022). Consequently, the environmental impact of CO2 emissions requires widespread monitoring worldwide to analyze the effects on climate change (eg., floods, landslides, droughts, and increase in global average temperature). All these effects weigh under the economic conditions of each country (Halldó rsson and Kovács, 2010). As Hao et al. (2021), green growth and eco-innovation revolutionize the industrial structure. The G7 countries must focus on a green growth strategy to achieve the SDGs.
In the renewable energy capacity in Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam, it is found that Indonesia plays a vital role using the renewable energy system in the country’s economic growth. The installed capacity of the renewable energy system in Indonesia is 14,690,000 MW. On the other hand, the Pakistan study looked at how different types of energy, such as renewables, fossil fuels, oil-based electrical generation, and hydroelectric power, can affect the output level in Pakistan. Our study concludes that while using fossil fuels to boost economic growth may be beneficial in the early stages of production, it is not helpful in the later stages of production. Whereas using clean energy may not be beneficial in the early stages of production in expanding production activities in developing countries, it is beneficial in the later stages of production not only for production but also for the environment. Policy makers should speed up the deep reforms regarding renewable energy to mitigate environmental degradation (Koengkan et al., 2020b). It has been proven that globalization can stimulate renewable energy sources for Latin American countries (Koengkan et al., 2020a). This will be beneficial in the region and at the world stage, developing green energy technologies. Thus, it is suggested that policy makers take advantage of globalization to reduce the costs of RE technologies and develop policies encouraging the access of these technologies by households with low income.
This is to note that the study has some limitations. For example, in this article, we have considered mainly G7 and N-11 countries which reflect primarily developed and developing countries. Meanwhile, many underdeveloped countries were not considered in the study. In addition, we have taken the last 10 years (2010–2021) of published articles for this systematic review. But the world economic conditions have been changing rapidly among nations. If we would consider the recent 5 years, the outcome of the review process may vary.
Furthermore, we have only analyzed English language articles. But there may be other critically related articles published in local languages such as Mandarin Chinese, Russians, and Spanish. Thus, we believe there is scope for more research on this topic area.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
MB: conceptualization, methodology, resources and software, writing—original draft, and supervision. VK: original draft. AM: investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, supervision, and formal analysis. GP: data curation, validation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. QZ: Revise, Proofread. XH: Proofread.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank the financial support of Széchenyi 2020 under the “EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00015.”
References
Acheampong, A. O., Dzator, J., and Savage, D. A. (2021). Renewable Energy, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Sub-saharan Africa: Does Institutional Quality Matter? J. Pol. Model. 43 (5), 1070–1093. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.03.011
Adewuyi, A. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Renewable Energy in Nigeria: A Case of Bioethanol and Biodiesel Production. Energ. Rep. 6 (February), 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.12.002
Ajayi, O. O., Mokryani, G., and Edun, B. M. (2022). Sustainable Energy for National Climate Change, Food Security and Employment Opportunities: Implications for Nigeria. Fuel Communications 10, 100045. doi:10.1016/j.jfueco.2021.100045
Ahmad, M., and Hasan, G. M. J. (2021). “Chapter 25 - Renewable Energy in Bangladesh: Status and Potential,” in Design, Analysis, and Applications of Renewable Energy Systems. Editors A T Azar, and N A Kamal (Cambridge: Academic Press), 607–625. Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (ANDC). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-824555-2.00023-X
Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., et al. (2021). Modelling the Dynamic Linkages between Eco-Innovation, Urbanization, Economic Growth and Ecological Footprints for G7 Countries: Does Financial Globalization Matter? Sustain. Cities Soc. 70, 102881. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881
Alam, M. J., Ahmed, M., and Begum, I. A. (2017). Nexus between Non-renewable Energy Demand and Economic Growth in Bangladesh: Application of Maximum Entropy Bootstrap Approach. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 72, 399–406. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.007
Amri, F. (2017). Intercourse across Economic Growth, Trade and Renewable Energy Consumption in Developing and Developed Countries. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 69, 527–534. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230
Armeanu, D. S., Joldes, C. C., Gherghina, S. C., and Andrei, J. V. (2021). Understanding the Multidimensional Linkages Among Renewable Energy, Pollution, Economic Growth and Urbanization in Contemporary Economies: Quantitative Assessments across Different Income Countries' Groups. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 142, 110818. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110818
Awodumi, O. B., and Adewuyi, A. O. (2020). The Role of Non-renewable Energy Consumption in Economic Growth and Carbon Emission: Evidence from Oil Producing Economies in Africa. Energ. Strategy Rev. 27 (January), 100434. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100434
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Ibáñez-Luzón, L., Usman, M., and Shahbaz, M. (2022). The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Based on the Economic Complexity, and the Pollution haven Hypothesis in PIIGS Countries. Renew. Energ. 185, 1441–1455. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.059
Baniya, B., Giurco, D., and Kelly, S. (2021). Green Growth in Nepal and Bangladesh: Empirical Analysis and Future Prospects. Energy Policy 149 (July 2020), 112049. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112049
Bhuiyan, M. R. A., Mamur, H., and Begum, J. (2021). A Brief Review on Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resources in Bangladesh. Clean. Eng. Techn. 4, 100208. doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100208
Chen, C., Pinar, M., and Stengos, T. (2020). Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus: Evidence from a Threshold Model. Energy policy 139, 111295. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111295
Come Zebra, E. I., van der Windt, H. J., Nhumaio, G., and Faaij, A. P. C. (2021). A Review of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Mini-Grids for Off-Grid Electrification in Developing Countries. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 144 (July), 111036. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111036
Djurisic, V., Smolovic, J. C., Misnic, N., and Rogic, S. (2020). Analysis of Public Attitudes and Perceptions towards Renewable Energy Sources in Montenegro. Energ. Rep. 6 (November), 395–403. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.059
Doytch, N., and Narayan, S. (2016). Does FDI Influence Renewable Energy Consumption? an Analysis of Sectoral FDI Impact on Renewable and Non-renewable Industrial Energy Consumption. Energ. Econ. 54, 291–301. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.010
Doytch, N., and Narayan, S. (2021). Does Transitioning towards Renewable Energy Accelerate Economic Growth? an Analysis of Sectoral Growth for a Dynamic Panel of Countries. Energy 235, 121290. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121290
Gabr, E. M., and Mohamed, S. M. (2020). Energy Management Model to Minimize Fuel Consumption and Control Harmful Gas Emissions. Int. J. Energ Water Res. 4 (4), 453–463. doi:10.1007/s42108-020-00085-2
Halldórsson, Á., and Kovács, G. (2010). The Sustainable Agenda and Energy Efficiency. Int. J. Phys. Distribution Logistics Manage. 40 (1/2), 5–13. doi:10.1108/09600031011018019
Hao, L.-N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., and Ali, W. (2021). Green Growth and Low Carbon Emission in G7 Countries: How Critical the Network of Environmental Taxes, Renewable Energy and Human Capital Is? Sci. Total Environ. 752, 141853. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
Irfan, M., Zhao, Z.-Y., Rehman, A., Ozturk, I., and Li, H. (2021). Consumers' Intention-Based Influence Factors of Renewable Energy Adoption in Pakistan: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (1), 432–445. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10504-w
Islam, M. M., Irfan, M., Shahbaz, M., and Vo, X. V. (2022). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption in Bangladesh: The Relative Influencing Profiles of Economic Factors, Urbanization, Physical Infrastructure and Institutional Quality. Renew. Energ. 184, 1130–1149. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.020
Islam, M. M., Khan, M. K., Tareque, M., Jehan, N., and Dagar, V. (2021). Impact of Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Energy Consumption on CO2 Emissions in Bangladesh: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 48851–48871. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4
Ivanovski, K., Hailemariam, A., and Smyth, R. (2021). The Effect of Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: Non-parametric Evidence. J. Clean. Prod. 286, 124956. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124956
Jenniches, S. (2018). Assessing the Regional Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources - A Literature Review. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 93 (October), 35–51. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.008
Jiang, T., Yu, Y., Jahanger, A., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Structural Emissions Reduction of China's Power and Heating Industry under the Goal of "double Carbon": A Perspective from Input-Output Analysis. Sustainable Prod. Consumption 31, 346–356. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.003
Jordan, S., and Philips, A. Q. (2018). DYNARDL: Stata Module to Dynamically Simulate Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Models. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s458572.
Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., and Marques, A. C. (2019). “The Relationship between Financial Openness, Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth in the Latin American Countries: an Approach with a Panel Vector Auto Regression Model,” in The Extended Energy-Growth Nexus. Editors J A Fuinhas, and A Marques (Cambridge: Academic Press), 199–229. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-815719-0.00007-3
Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., and Santiago, R. (2020b). The Relationship between CO2 Emissions, Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Urbanisation in the Southern Common Market. J. Environ. Econ. Pol. 9 (4), 383–401. doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1702902
Koengkan, M., Poveda, Y. E., and Fuinhas, J. A. (2020a). Globalisation as a Motor of Renewable Energy Development in Latin America Countries. GeoJournal 85 (6), 1591–1602. doi:10.1007/s10708-019-10042-0
Konuk, F., Zeren, F., Akpınar, S., and Yıldız, Ş. (2021). Biomass Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Further Evidence from NEXT-11 Countries. Energ. Rep. 7 (November), 4825–4832. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.070
Latake, P. T., Pawar, P., and Ranveer, A. C. (2015). The Greenhouse Effect and its Impacts on Environment. Int. J. Innov. Res. Creat. Technol. 1 (3), 333–337.
Lema, R., Bhamidipati, P. L., Gregersen, C., Hansen, U. E., and Kirchherr, J. (2021). China's Investments in Renewable Energy in Africa: Creating Co-benefits or Just Cashing-in?World Development. World Develop. 141 (May), 105365. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105365
Li, R., and Leung, G. C. K. (2021). The Relationship between Energy Prices, Economic Growth and Renewable Energy Consumption: Evidence from Europe. Energ. Rep. 7, 1712–1719. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.030
Mohamed, H., Alimi, M., and Youssef, S. B. (2021). The Role of Renewable Energy in Reducing Terrorism: Evidence From Pakistan. Renewable Energy 175, 1088–1100. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.024
Murshed, M. (2021). Can Regional Trade Integration Facilitate Renewable Energy Transition to Ensure Energy Sustainability in South Asia? Energ. Rep. 7, 808–821. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.038
Namahoro, J. P., Nzabanita, J., and Wu, Q. (2021a). The Impact of Total and Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth in Lower and Middle- and Upper-Middle-Income Groups: Evidence from CS-DL and CCEMG Analysis. Energy 237, 121536. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121536
Namahoro, J. P., Wu, Q., Xiao, H., and Zhou, N. (2021b). The Asymmetric Nexus of Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Rwanda. Renew. Energ. 174, 336–346. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.017
Nong, D., Wang, C., and Al-Amin, A. Q. (2020). A Critical Review of Energy Resources, Policies and Scientific Studies towards a Cleaner and More Sustainable Economy in Vietnam. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 134, 110117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110117
Ogonowski, P. (2021). Application of VMCM, to Assess of Renewable Energy Impact in European Union Countries. Proced. Comput. Sci. 192, 4762–4769. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.254
Oluoch, S., Lal, P., Susaeta, A., and Vedwan, N. (2020). Assessment of Public Awareness, Acceptance and Attitudes towards Renewable Energy in Kenya. Scientific Afr. 9 (September), e00512. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00512
Park, S.-H., Jung, W.-J., Kim, T.-H., and Lee, S.-Y. T. (2016). Can Renewable Energy Replace Nuclear Power in Korea? an Economic Valuation Analysis. Nucl. Eng. Techn. 48 (2), 559–571. doi:10.1016/j.net.2015.12.012
Pesaran, M. H., and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics 142 (1), 50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Prisma (2021). Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. available at http://www.prisma-statement.org/(Last accessed date December 18, 2021).
RECAI (2020). Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index. Available at https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/power-and-utilities/ey-recai-56-country-index.pdf (Last accessed date December 19, 2021).
Seetharaman, K. M., Moorthy, K., Patwa, N., Saravanan, Yash., and Gupta, Y. (2019). Breaking Barriers in Deployment of Renewable Energy. Heliyon 5 (1), e01166. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166
Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Erkut, B., and Mundi, H. S. (2021). Exploring the Nexus between Non-renewable and Renewable Energy Consumptions and Economic Development: Evidence from Panel Estimations. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 146, 111152. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111152
Shrinkhal, R. (2019). “Economics, Technology, and Environmental Protection,” in Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 569–580. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813912-7.00022-3
Smolović, J. C., Muhadinović, M., Radonjić, M., and Đurašković, J. (2020). How Does Renewable Energy Consumption Affect Economic Growth in the Traditional and New Member States of the European Union? Energ. Rep. 6 (November), 505–513. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.028
Soytas, U., and Sari, R. (2003). Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationship in G-7 Countries and Emerging Markets. Energ. Econ. 25 (1), 33–37. doi:10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00009-9
Thollander, P., Danestig, M., and Rohdin, P. (2007). Energy Policies for Increased Industrial Energy Efficiency: Evaluation of a Local Energy Programme for Manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy 35 (11), 5774–5783. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.013
Tsagkari, M., Roca, J., and Kallis, G. (2021). "From Local Island Energy to Degrowth? Exploring Democracy, Self-Sufficiency, and Renewable Energy Production in Greece and Spain". Energ. Res. Soc. Sci. 81 (November), 102288. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102288
Tutak, M., and Brodny, J. (2022). Renewable Energy Consumption in Economic Sectors in the EU-27. The Impact on Economics, Environment and Conventional Energy Sources. A 20-Year Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 345 (April), 131076. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131076
Usman, M., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Environmental Concern in the Era of Industrialization: Can Financial Development, Renewable Energy and Natural Resources Alleviate Some Load? Energy Policy 162, 112780. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780
Usman, O., Alola, A. A., and Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). Assessment of the Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Policy on Environmental Degradation Using Innovation Accounting: Evidence from the US. Renew. Energ. 150 (May), 266–277. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.151
Wang, Q., and Wang, L. (2020). Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Nonlinear Panel Data Analysis. Energy 207, 118200. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118200
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 69 (6), 709–748. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Xiong, P.-p., Dang, Y.-g., Yao, T.-x., and Wang, Z.-x. (2014). Optimal Modeling and Forecasting of the Energy Consumption and Production in China. Energy 77, 623–634. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.056
Yang, D.-x., Jing, Y.-q., Wang, C., Nie, P.-y., and Sun, P. (2021). Analysis of Renewable Energy Subsidy in China under Uncertainty: Feed-In Tariff vs. Renewable Portfolio Standard. Energ. Strategy Rev. 34 (March), 100628. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100628
Glossary
AHP analytical hierarchy process
ARDL autoregressive-distributed lag
Brics Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa
CAES computer-assisted execution system
CO2 carbon dioxide
COVID-19 coronavirus disease variant
CSARDL cross sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag
CSP concentrated solar power
DEA data envelopment analysis
EDI economic development indicators
ET environmental taxes
FDI foreign direct investment
FIT feed-in tariff
FWASPAS fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment
G7 Group of Seven
GDP gross domestic product
GG green growth
GHG greenhouse gas
GMM generalized method of moments
HC human capital
HRES hybrid renewable energy systems renewable energy
KOF Konjunkturforschungsstelle
MCDM multi-criteria decision methodology
MLA Modern Language Association
N-11 Next-11
NARDL non-linear autoregressive-distributed lagged model
NOX nitric oxide
NPV net present value
OECD Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
PHCN Power Holding Company of Nigeria
PMG Pooled Mean Group
PRISMA preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
PV photovoltaic
PVAR panel vector autoregression
R&D research and development
RE renewable energy
REC renewble energy consumption
RECAI Company’s Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index
REI renewble energy investment
RES renewable energy sources
RPS renewable portfolio standard
RWA rolling window approach
SCI/SSCI science citation index/social sciences citation index
SDGs sustainable development goals
SO2 sulfur dioxide
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Keywords: renewable energy, economic growth, consumption, Next-11 countries, Group 7
Citation: Bhuiyan MA, Zhang Q, Khare V, Mikhaylov A, Pinter G and Huang X (2022) Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus—A Systematic Literature Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:878394. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.878394
Received: 21 February 2022; Accepted: 28 March 2022;
Published: 29 April 2022.
Edited by:
Faik Bilgili, Erciyes University, TurkeyReviewed by:
Matheus Koengkan, University of Evora, PortugalDaniel Balsalobre-Lorente, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Sevda Kuşkaya, Erciyes University, Turkey
Copyright © 2022 Bhuiyan, Zhang, Khare, Mikhaylov, Pinter and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gabor Pinter, cGludGVyLmdhYm9yQHVuaS1wZW4uaHU=