Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci., 25 March 2022
Sec. Soil Processes
This article is part of the Research Topic Environmental Contaminants in Aquatic Systems and Chemical Safety for Environmental and Human Health, Volume II View all 11 articles

Emerging Contaminants in Soil and Water

  • 1Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Tropical Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Homestead, FL, United States
  • 2Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Tropical Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Homestead, FL, United States

The global population increase puts tremendous pressure on the already dwindling natural resources such as soil and freshwater. Healthy and productive soils as well as the availability of freshwater resources are critical for agricultural productivity. On the other hand, climate change and variability make the water scarcity problem even worse. Agriculture, being the biggest consumer of fresh water, is expected to be affected significantly. Yet, agriculture is expected to play a significant role in achieving greater food, and fiber needs to meet the growing global population. In addition, soil and water quality are also becoming a bigger threat to soil productivity and freshwater availability. Some portion of nutrients applied to agriculture and urban landscapes end up in runoff and leaching water that feeds streams, rivers, lakes, groundwater, etc. These excess nutrient loadings are causing soil and water quality deterioration, which could have severe impacts on human health, aquatic ecosystems, and environmental sustainability. In addition to nutrient and chemical pollutions, emerging contaminants such as heavy metals are showing an increasing trend in soil and freshwater bodies. These emerging contaminants not only impair soil quality and freshwater sources but could also get into the food chain and affect human and animal health. While growing evidence is becoming available on the increasing threats from emerging contaminants, research and understanding are still limited. This mini-review paper summarizes available research on types of emerging contaminants and their impacts on soil and water quality.

Introduction

In 2050, demands for water and energy are projected to significantly increase (McDonald et al., 2011; Alexandratos, 2012; Ray et al., 2013; Ittersum et al., 2016; Boretti and Rosa, 2019). According to a report by FAO (FAO, 2009), 90% of the required global increase in crop production is expected to be achieved through greater yields and increased cropping intensity as an expansion of agricultural lands is impractical (Cassman, 1999; Guilpart et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2018). This is because land availability is limited, and agricultural land use is facing competition with urbanization and other land uses. Soil quality degradation is also putting lands out of production. In addition, the combined effects of more frequent droughts, climate change, variability, and competing needs from different sectors put greater pressure on natural resources (Elliott et al., 2014; Iizumi and Ramankutty, 2015). These would significantly impact agriculture since it relies on productive soils and the availability of water resources (McDonald et al., 2011; Yigzaw and Hossain, 2016; Kullberg et al., 2017).

With population growth and dwindling freshwater resources, the use of reclaimed water for irrigation has increased (Lavrnić et al., 2017). Despite the advantages of using reclaimed wastewater, safety concerns have been raised regarding the use of this supply for irrigation water (Sato et al., 2013; Paltiel et al., 2016). The main issue with reclaimed water is that it contains various organic contaminants that have been identified as emerging threats (Calderón-Preciado et al., 2011; Bueno et al., 2012). Effluent from these treatment facilities can contain various organic chemicals. Some of these could cause cancer and contaminate the surrounding soil and water sources (US EPA, 2014). Very little attention is paid to date on the status of these contaminants in treated wastewater at various levels of the treatment processes (Bolong et al., 2009). Lack of routine measurements of emerging contaminants in the influent water into the wastewater treatment plants or effluent water at various levels of wastewater treatments, i.e., secondary, or tertiary treatments, limits our understanding of removal of these contaminants, if any, at any level of the wastewater treatment process (von der Ohe et al., 2011). The effectiveness of water treatment steps in the removal of emerging contaminants is not conclusive. Bai et al. (2018) suggested that wastewater treatment plants were primary sources of emerging contaminants observed in surface water samples. Therefore, it is erroneous to assume that even tertiary treated wastewater is free of these emerging contaminants (Köck-Schulmeyer et al., 2011; Cabeza et al., 2012; López-Serna et al., 2012).

During recent years there has been an increased awareness and concern regarding the new group of contaminants in soil and water bodies (Bolong et al., 2009; Houtman, 2010; von der Ohe et al., 2011, US EPA., 2015; Bai et al., 2018, 201). These exist in trace concentrations but are highly toxic and often originate from the disposal of treated wastewater into the soil and surface and groundwater bodies (Bolong et al., 2009; Loos et al., 2013; Petrie et al., 2015). The most common contaminants are solids, dissolved or suspended particulates, nutrients, and heavy metals (Wuana and Okieimen, 2011; Gasser et al., 2014).

Soil is considered as one of the final destinations of chemical wastes (Sakshi et al., 2019). Prolonged soil pollution with chemical wastes can harm living organisms within the food chain (Jaishankar et al., 2014). The increasing levels of emerging contaminants in the soil and aquatic environments pose a threat to human health and ecosystems (Srikanth, 2019). Anthropogenic activities such as mining and industrial waste disposal, as well as the use of chemicals and chemical fertilizers such as arsenic (As)-based fertilizers have been identified as contributing to the increasing emerging contaminants in ecosystems (Bali et al., 2021). Wastewater is also reported as a source for emerging contaminants since traditional methods of treating wastewater are not efficient and costly to completely remove emerging contaminants (Divyapriya et al., 2021). Petrie et al. (2015) confirmed that wastewater treatment procedures used in the treatment plants were not effective in completely removing emerging contaminants.

Up until recently, very little attention was given to these new group of contaminants which could exist in very low concentrations but are quite harmful to marine life and humans if they enter the food chain (Houtman, 2010; von der Ohe et al., 2011; Petousi et al., 2019). Furthermore, there is no full understanding of how these emerging contaminants accumulate in the soil, especially after several years of use of treated wastewater for irrigation and uptake and bioaccumulation of these contaminants by the plants. This mini-review mainly focuses on the major types of emerging contaminants that are reported to impair soil and water quality.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are abundant chemicals found naturally in fossil fuels (Cao et al., 2017). Incomplete combustion of coal, gas, wood, and oil also produces PAHs (Hsu et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2017). Soil is one of the ultimate ecological destinations of PAHs (Agarwal et al., 2009). PAHs are known for their high rate of bioconcentration and quickly entering the food chain (Yang et al., 2022). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has identified 16 PAHs as top contaminants (Cao et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019). Due to their lipophilic and hydrophobic properties, PAHs are persistent; they can stay in the soil for long periods (Agarwal et al., 2009; Košnář et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). They do not burn very easily or break down in the water (Li et al., 2019). The increasing molecular mass can logarithmically decrease the solubility PAHs in an aqueous solution (Johnsen et al., 2005). Due to less solubility and low volatility of PAHs with five or more rings, they are abundantly found in a granular type, attached to contaminated air, soil, or sediment particulates (Choi et al., 2010). In contrast, PAHs with low rings are readily available for biological uptake and degradation due to their easy solubility in water (Mackay and Callcott, 1998). In general, PAHs with higher rings are more persistent in the environment than the lower rings (Johnsen et al., 2005).

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme studied carcinogenic properties of 60 PAHs (IARC, 2010). Among 60 PAHs examined, benzo [a]pyrene was categorized as carcinogenic to humans. Cyclopenta [cd]pyrene, dibenz [a,h] anthracene, and dibenzo [a,l] pyrene were categorized as probably carcinogenic to humans. A total of 11 other studied PAHs were categorized as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Poucke et al., 2012; Jameson, 2019).

Regarding the effects of PAHs on plants, however, there were mixed reports. Several studies have reported that PAHs had adverse effects on the development of plants (Alkio et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2009; An et al., 2018). Studies also reported that PAHs have either no effect or promoted plant growth (Maliszewska-Kordybach and Smreczak, 2000; Ling and Gao, 2004; Meng and Chi, 2015).

Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products

Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are products such as toothpaste, skincare products, fragrances, antibiotics, pharmaceutical medicines used by consumers for their health and cosmetic purposes, or veterinary drugs that are used by agroindustry to enhance the growth or health of livestock (Wang and Huang, 2019; Bishnoi et al., 2022). PPCPs are becoming very common in environments where the traditional wastewater treatment plants are not able to effectively remove them (Wang and Wang, 2016). Waste from animal farms and sewage treatment plants can also lead to the release of emerging contaminants into the aquatic and soil environments (Ebele et al., 2017). Sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants is commonly used as a fertilizer for agriculture (Corradini, 2014). It contains various nutrients such as potassium, nitrogen, manganese, and iron (Mtshali et al., 2014). However, treated sewage sludge can also contain various emerging contaminants such as antibiotics, chemicals, and engineering nanomaterials (Koumaki et al., 2021). PPCPs are among the emerging contaminants found in sewage sludge that have potential adverse ecological impacts or human health risks if they are released into ecosystems (Van et al., 2021).

Due to little understanding of the possible environmental impacts of PPCPs, they are considered contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) (Vasilachi et al., 2021). The other source of PPCPs in the soil is treated wastewater or contaminated river water, which is used for irrigation (Gallego et al., 2021). Soils are often contaminated with CECs that have low hydrophobicity. These can then be accumulated in the soil through organic material interactions (Beltrán et al., 2020).

A study in Spain on 166 emerging contaminants and heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Ni, Pb, and Hg) found that 38 pharmaceuticals, albeit low concentrations, were detected in tertiary treated wastewater (Cabeza et al., 2012). This supports similar findings from other studies (Bolong et al., 2009; Ziylan and Ince, 2011; Cabeza et al., 2012) suggesting that wastewater treatment processes are not effective in removing some of the emerging contaminants. Incomplete removal of these contaminants, particularly pharmaceuticals, during the treatment process is the main reason for recent findings of these contaminants in the water bodies used for disposal of treated wastewater (Kasprzyk-Hordern et al., 2008a, 2008b; Cabeza et al., 2012). Bai et al. (2018) conducted a detailed study on the status of emerging contaminants in surface water sources in Denver, Colorado, where the surface water flow is influenced by snowmelt during spring and discharge from several wastewater treatment plants distributed across that region. Their findings showed that 76% (109 of 144) analyzed pharmaceutical compounds were found in water samples (Bai et al., 2018). Such high percent detection of emerging contaminants in water samples, despite the substantial dilution of treated wastewater by the natural water flow, suggests that discharge of treated wastewater from several wastewater treatment plants could be a major source of emerging contaminants (Bai et al., 2018). Similarly, Petrie et al. (2015) summarized the concentrations of several pharmaceuticals in influent and effluent water from the wastewater treatment plant as well as surface water samples in the United Kingdom. There was a clear trend of detection of emerging contaminants in the surface water samples that were exposed to treated wastewater with the effluent that has high concentrations.

Pesticides

A pesticide is a substance that works by killing pests or keeping them from damaging the environment (Aktar et al., 2009). Some examples of known pesticides are those used against insects, plant pathogens, and microorganisms. Although they are useful for keeping pests and diseases at bay, they can also cause toxicities to humans and other organisms (USGS, 2017). Over 95% of the chemicals used for pest control reach other places beyond their intended destinations such as air, water, and soils. A study conducted by the US Geological Survey (USGS) on the surface water of 38 streams in the US found top 10 most frequently detected anthropogenic contaminants were: eight pesticides (CIAT, chlorpyrifos, AMPA, metolachlor, dieldrin, atrazine, de-sulfinyl fipronil, and glyphosate) and two pharmaceutical drugs (caffeine, metformin) with 66–84% detection rates (Bradley et al., 2017). Pesticides are among the highly persistent chemicals in soil. The excessive use of these chemicals can lead to the formation of soil contaminants (Pullagurala et al., 2018). It has been revealed that the use of pesticides is increasing in some areas despite being banned (Pan et al., 2019). Organochlorine pesticides, also known as OCPs, are among the persistent organic pollutants. OCPs are known to have high toxicity, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification in the environment (Sparling, 2016). Bai et al. (2018) reported that surface water samples contained 39 of 72 (54%) of analyzed pesticides.

Phthalate Esters

Phthalate esters (PAEs) are often used as an additive to improve the flexibility of certain polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resins. They are also used in various other resins such as cellulose, vinyl acetate, and polyurethanes. The stability, fluidity, and low volatility of Phthalate esters make them ideal for plasticizers (Peijnenburg, 2008). These derivatives are produced by phthalic anhydride and are mixed with plastics to increase their properties, such as resilience, plasticity, and pellucidity (Thomas and Brogat, 2017). PAEs can also be used as enteric coating agents for various applications (Kapoor et al., 2020). End-user applications of these derivatives include resin houses, agricultural adjuvants, cosmetic products, soap and laundry detergents, toys, and various other applications. PAEs are poorly water-soluble chemicals. The water solubility of a chemical is also a vital factor that influences the biodegradability and aquatic toxicity of a chemical. It also affects the distribution of these chemicals. Although PAEs are known to have low aqueous solubility, they can be quickly absorbed by organic residue and solid surfaces in the environmental systems (John Autian, 1973). Slow and steady accumulation and release of these chemicals could affect the ecological conditions of water systems. Sludge-amended soils and wastewater treatment facilities are also affected by this condition (Staples et al., 1997). Due to the widespread use of PAEs, their ubiquity has led to the accumulation of these chemicals in several ecosystems’ compartments. The accumulation of PAEs in agricultural soils could lead to the contamination of food chains and vegetables. It could also cause indirect or direct human exposure (Zeng et al., 2008).

Hormones

Due to the industrial growth of the world, steroidal estrogen has been considered an emergent issue. It has been known to severely affect aquatic life and soil fertility (Singh et al., 2021). Steroidal hormones are either synthetic or naturally occurring forms of estrogen that are released from the adrenal cortex and other parts of the animal and human body (Biga et al., 2019). Many of these emerging contaminants, such as synthetic or natural hormones, are known as hormone disrupters (Preisendanz et al., 2021). The human population discharges about 30,000 kg of natural steroidal estrogens and 700 kg of synthetic estrogens solely from birth control pill practices each year. The release of estrogens from livestock can be quite high. In the US and European Union, for instance, it is estimated that about 83,000 kg of estrogens are released annually (Adeel et al., 2017). Natural estrogens discharged from animal and human waste have been considered a serious threat to the environment (Arnon et al., 2008). This environmental issue is especially alarming since the use of bio-solids such as animal manure for organic farming has been widely adopted in the field (Xuan et al., 2008). A study conducted by USGS and EPA in 1999 and 2000 revealed that out of the 139 streams analyzed, 82 chemicals were found in 80 percent of them. The most common types of chemicals were steroids hormones, antibiotics, and insect repellent (USGS, 2002).

Perfluorinated Compounds

Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) are known to have various functional groups, such as perfluoroalkyl and perfluoro carboxylic acids (Corsini et al., 2014). Due to their high surface activities and chemical and thermal resistance, PFCs are commonly used as industrial chemicals in various industries such as textile, pesticides, and refrigeration (Prevedouros et al., 2006; US EPA, 2014; Liu et al., 2020). Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) are a type of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid. PFAAs are known to have widespread distribution and high abundance (Sha et al., 2022). Due to their persistence in the environment, PFAAs have been considered as an emerging contaminant of concern and a threat to human health and the environment (Kurtz et al., 2019). The PFAAs contaminate the soil in many ways, such as when the reclaimed wastewater is used for irrigation (Jürling, 2021)or biosolids are added as a fertilizer for crop production (Blaine et al., 2013). Biosolids are the organic materials produced by the treatment of sewage sludge. They are typically treated according to the regulations of their respective governments (Lu et al., 2012). In the US, around 60% of the land used for farming is devoted to the application of these materials (Blaine et al., 2013). Currently, the US Environmental Protection Agency enforces various regulations regarding the land use of biosolids (US EPA, 2013b). However, there is no regulation for PFAAs in biosolids. This means that repeated applications of biosolids could cause potential contamination of the environment including soil, surface, and groundwater (Müller et al., 2011).

Engineered Nanomaterials

Engineered Nanomaterials (ENMs) are generally defined as particles with a dimension of less than 100 nm (US EPA, 2017). ENMs can be made through various chemical processes and physical steps, such as self-assembly or milling. ENMs exhibit special properties such as physicochemical, electrical conductivity, and mechanical strength (Luoma, 2008; US EPA, 2008). Due to their unique properties, nanomaterials are becoming more prevalent in various industries. However, their safety and environmental concerns are still unknown (US EPA, 2017). The release of ENMs into the soil during the field applications of biosolids and wastewater has been identified as a major source of pollution (Pan and Xing, 2012). They may also be released into the environment through manufacturing and ecological applications or inappropriate handling (US EPA, 2013a). The increasing number of ENM being deposited in terrestrial environments is expected to make these areas the largest repository for harmful materials.

The structure of nanomaterials can absorb toxic heavy metals such as copper, lead, mercury, and cadmium in the soil, air, and water. Due to their toxic properties, these metals can cause various disorders (Kamal et al., 2021). ENMs can also transform their properties depending on the environment’s biological, chemical and physical processes (Nowack et al., 2012). Researchers have been trying to determine if models or experiments are needed to predict the distribution of ENM pollutants in different environmental compartments such as soil, water, and atmosphere (Wiesner et al., 2009; Westerhoff and Nowack, 2013).

The factors that determine the exposure risks of engineered nanomaterials will also be affected by the processes involved in their transformation. Not only does this process affect the release of ENM into the environment, but it also affects the products that contain it. Depending on the properties of the material and the transformation they undergo, released ENM may have a lesser or greater environmental impact than the materials that were initially produced. Although the released and transformed materials are the ones that are actually in the environment, the effects of these are still unknown (Nowack et al., 2012).

The effects ENMs on plants depends on several factors including soil properties and physicochemical characteristics of ENMs. Although the presence of other co-existing contaminants can affect the bioavailability of ENMs. Studies have shown that soil amendment with substances such as biochar can help minimize the uptake of certain ENMs by plants (Reddy et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2017; Servin et al., 2017; Pullagurala et al., 2018).

Conclusion

Increasing trends in emerging contaminants have been documented in several places throughout the world. Several studies have documented considerable evidence of widespread concern on the emerging contaminants contamination of soils and surface water linked to the discharge of treated wastewater. However, there is a lack of full understanding about the fate of these contaminants in treated wastewater when used for irrigation, in terms of crop uptake, bioaccumulation, getting into the food chain, and eventually health risks to humans and other living organisms. In addition, the effectiveness of different wastewater treatment procedures to remove emerging contaminants and/or their metabolites from the influent water is not clearly understood. As such, there is a critical need to develop standards and policy guidelines regarding limits of these emerging contaminant concentrations contaminant in soil and water. Therefore, this mini-review calls for the need for assessing the environmental and potential human exposure risks of emerging contaminants originating from the discharge of treated wastewater into natural water bodies. Specifically, there is a compelling need to investigate: 1) temporal variation in concentrations of various emerging contaminants in secondary and tertiary treated wastewater from wastewater treatment plants, depending on the level of wastewater treatment before it is disposed to surface or groundwater bodies or marine environment or used for irrigation of crops; 2) potential risks of these contaminants, if exist in treated wastewater in high concentrations, entry into the food chain by agricultural products which are irrigated by treated wastewater directly or surface water which receive treated wastewater discharge as disposal mechanism. The availability of such information will help to guide policy towards developing critically needed standards on threshold limits of such contaminants in discharge water from wastewater treatment plants and other point sources of pollution.

Author Contributions

HB prepared the draft manuscript, FT conducted an additional literature review, HB, FT, and YL contributed to manuscript revision, proofreading. All authors have approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Funding

This mini-review is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, under award number 2020-67019-31163. Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the US Department of Agriculture.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Adeel, M., Song, X., Wang, Y., Francis, D., and Yang, Y. (2017). Environmental Impact of Estrogens on Human, Animal and Plant Life: A Critical Review. Environ. Int. 99, 107–119. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Agarwal, T., Khillare, P. S., Shridhar, V., and Ray, S. (2009). Pattern, Sources and Toxic Potential of PAHs in the Agricultural Soils of Delhi, India. J. Hazard. Mater. 163, 1033–1039. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aktar, W., Sengupta, D., and Chowdhury, A. (2009). Impact of Pesticides Use in Agriculture: Their Benefits and Hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2, 1–12. doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexandratos, N. (2012). World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The Revision, 154.

Google Scholar

Alkio, M., Tabuchi, T. M., Wang, X., and Colón-Carmona, A. (2005). Stress Responses to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Arabidopsis Include Growth Inhibition and Hypersensitive Response-like Symptoms. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 2983–2994. doi:10.1093/jxb/eri295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

An, N., Tang, C.-S., Xu, S.-K., Gong, X.-P., Shi, B., and Inyang, H. I. (2018). Effects of Soil Characteristics on Moisture Evaporation. Eng. Geology. 239, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arnon, S., Dahan, O., Elhanany, S., Cohen, K., Pankratov, I., Gross, A., et al. (2008). Transport of Testosterone and Estrogen from Dairy-Farm Waste Lagoons to Groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5521–5526. doi:10.1021/es800784m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, X., Lutz, A., Carroll, R., Keteles, K., Dahlin, K., Murphy, M., et al. (2018). Occurrence, Distribution, and Seasonality of Emerging Contaminants in Urban Watersheds. Chemosphere 200, 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bali, A. S., Sidhu, G. P. S., and Kumar, V. (2021). “Plant Enzymes in Metabolism of Organic Pollutants,” in Handbook of Bioremediation. Editors M. Hasanuzzaman, and M. N. V. Prasad (Academic Press), 465–474. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819382-2.00029-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beltrán, E. M., Pablos, M. V., Fernández Torija, C., Porcel, M. Á., and González-Doncel, M. (2020). Uptake of Atenolol, Carbamazepine and Triclosan by Crops Irrigated with Reclaimed Water in a Mediterranean Scenario. Ecotoxicology Environ. Saf. 191, 110171. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110171

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biga, L. M., Dawson, S., Harwell, A., Hopkins, R., Kaufmann, J., LeMaster, M., et al. (2019). 17.2 Hormones. Available at: https://open.oregonstate.education/aandp/chapter/17-2-hormones/(Accessed January 24, 2022).

Google Scholar

Bishnoi, M. M., Verma, A., Kushwaha, A., and Goswami, S. (2022). “Social Factors Influencing Household Waste Management,” in Emerging Trends to Approaching Zero Waste. Editors C. M. Hussain, S. Singh, and L. Goswami (Elsevier), 197–213. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-85403-0.00008-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blaine, A. C., Rich, C. D., Hundal, L. S., Lau, C., Mills, M. A., Harris, K. M., et al. (2013). Uptake of Perfluoroalkyl Acids into Edible Crops via Land Applied Biosolids: Field and Greenhouse Studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 14062–14069. doi:10.1021/es403094q

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolong, N., Ismail, A. F., Salim, M. R., and Matsuura, T. (2009). A Review of the Effects of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater and Options for Their Removal. Desalination 239, 229–246. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boretti, A., and Rosa, L. (2019). Reassessing the Projections of the World Water Development Report. Npj Clean. Water 2, 1–6. doi:10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradley, P. M., Journey, C. A., Romanok, K. M., Barber, L. B., Buxton, H. T., Foreman, W. T., et al. (2017). Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4792–4802. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bueno, M. J. M., Gomez, M. J., Herrera, S., Hernando, M. D., Agüera, A., and Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2012). Occurrence and Persistence of Organic Emerging Contaminants and Priority Pollutants in Five Sewage Treatment Plants of Spain: Two Years Pilot Survey Monitoring. Environ. Pollut. 164, 267–273. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabeza, Y., Candela, L., Ronen, D., and Teijon, G. (2012). Monitoring the Occurrence of Emerging Contaminants in Treated Wastewater and Groundwater between 2008 and 2010. The Baix Llobregat (Barcelona, Spain). J. Hazard. Mater. 239-240, 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calderón-Preciado, D., Jiménez-Cartagena, C., Matamoros, V., and Bayona, J. M. (2011). Screening of 47 Organic Microcontaminants in Agricultural Irrigation Waters and Their Soil Loading. Water Res. 45, 221–231. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, H., Chao, S., Qiao, L., Jiang, Y., Zeng, X., and Fan, X. (2017). Urbanization-related Changes in Soil PAHs and Potential Health Risks of Emission Sources in a Township in Southern Jiangsu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 575, 692–700. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological Intensification of Cereal Production Systems: Yield Potential, Soil Quality, and Precision Agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 5952–5959. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, H., Harrison, R., Komulainen, H., and Saborit, J. M. D. (2010). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. World Health Organ. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138709/(Accessed January 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

Corradini, C. (2014). Soil Moisture in the Development of Hydrological Processes and its Determination at Different Spatial Scales. J. Hydrol. 516, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corsini, E., Luebke, R. W., Germolec, D. R., and DeWitt, J. C. (2014). Perfluorinated Compounds: Emerging POPs With Potential Immunotoxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 230, 263–270. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, R., Lin, D., Zhu, L., Majumdar, S., White, J. C., Gardea-Torresdey, J. L., et al. (2017). Nanoparticle Interactions with Co-existing Contaminants: Joint Toxicity, Bioaccumulation and Risk. Nanotoxicology 11, 591–612. doi:10.1080/17435390.2017.1343404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Divyapriya, G., Singh, S., Martínez-Huitle, C. A., Scaria, J., Karim, A. V., and Nidheesh, P. V. (2021). Treatment of Real Wastewater by Photoelectrochemical Methods: An Overview. Chemosphere 276, 130188. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebele, A. J., Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, M., and Harrad, S. (2017). Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in the Freshwater Aquatic Environment. Emerging Contaminants 3, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Müller, C., Frieler, K., Konzmann, M., Gerten, D., et al. (2014). Constraints and Potentials of Future Irrigation Water Availability on Agricultural Production under Climate Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3239–3244. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222474110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2009). Harmonized World Soil Database. Version 1.1. 43

Google Scholar

Gallego, S., Montemurro, N., Béguet, J., Rouard, N., Philippot, L., Pérez, S., et al. (2021). Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment of Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Microorganisms: Fate and Impact of Wastewater-Borne Micropollutants in Lettuce-Soil System. Ecotoxicology Environ. Saf. 223, 112595. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112595

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gasser, C. A., Yu, L., Svojitka, J., Wintgens, T., Ammann, E. M., Shahgaldian, P., et al. (2014). Advanced Enzymatic Elimination of Phenolic Contaminants in Wastewater: a Nano Approach at Field Scale. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 3305–3316. doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5414-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guilpart, N., Grassini, P., Sadras, V. O., Timsina, J., and Cassman, K. G. (2017). Estimating Yield Gaps at the Cropping System Level. Field Crops Res. 206, 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Houtman, C. J. (2010). Emerging Contaminants in Surface Waters and Their Relevance for the Production of Drinking Water in Europe. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 7, 271–295. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2010.511648

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, W. T., Liu, M. C., Hung, P. C., Chang, S. H., and Chang, M. B. (2016). PAH Emissions from Coal Combustion and Waste Incineration. J. Hazard. Mater. 318, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

IARC (2010). Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Occupational Exposures (Lyon, FranceGeneva: IARC Press ; Distributed by World Health Organization).

Google Scholar

Iizumi, T., and Ramankutty, N. (2015). How Do Weather and Climate Influence Cropping Area and Intensity? Glob. Food Security 4, 46–50. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2014.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., and Beeregowda, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 7, 60–72. doi:10.2478/intox-2014-0009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jameson, C. W. (2019). “Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Associated Occupational Exposures,” in Tumour Site Concordance and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Editors R. Baan, B. Stewart, and K. Straif (IARC Scientific Publications). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570325/.

Google Scholar

Johnsen, A. R., Wick, L. Y., and Harms, H. (2005). Principles of Microbial PAH-Degradation in Soil. Environ. Pollut. 133, 71–84. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jürling, H. (2021). Uptake of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids by Crops: Results from a Field Study. Environ. Sci. Process. Amp Impacts. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/69047144/Uptake_of_perfluorinated_alkyl_acids_by_crops_results_from_a_field_study (Accessed January 24, 2022).

Google Scholar

Kamal, S., Junaid, M., Bibi, I., Kamal, A., Rehman, K., and Akash, M. S. H. (2021). “Nanomaterials as Source of Environmental Contaminants: From Exposure to Preventive Interventions,” in Environmental Contaminants And Neurological Disorders Emerging Contaminants and Associated Treatment Technologies. Editors M. S. H. Akash, and K. Rehman (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 355–400. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66376-6_16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kapoor, D., Maheshwari, R., Verma, K., Sharma, S., Ghode, P., and Tekade, R. K. (2020). “Coating Technologies in Pharmaceutical Product Development,” in Drug Delivery Systems Advances in Pharmaceutical Product Development and Research. Editor R. K. Tekade (Academic Press), 665–719. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814487-9.00014-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Dinsdale, R. M., and Guwy, A. J. (2008a). Multiresidue Methods for the Analysis of Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products and Illicit Drugs in Surface Water and Wastewater by Solid-phase Extraction and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391, 1293–1308. doi:10.1007/s00216-008-1854-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Dinsdale, R. M., and Guwy, A. J. (2008b). The Occurrence of Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, Endocrine Disruptors and Illicit Drugs in Surface Water in South Wales, UK. Water Res. 42, 3498–3518. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Köck-Schulmeyer, M., Ginebreda, A., Postigo, C., López-Serna, R., Pérez, S., Brix, R., et al. (2011). Wastewater Reuse in Mediterranean Semi-arid Areas: The Impact of Discharges of Tertiary Treated Sewage on the Load of Polar Micro Pollutants in the Llobregat River (NE Spain). Chemosphere 82, 670–678. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Košnář, Z., Mercl, F., and Tlustoš, P. (2018). Ability of Natural Attenuation and Phytoremediation Using maize (Zea mays L.) to Decrease Soil Contents of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Derived from Biomass Fly Ash in Comparison with PAHs-Spiked Soil. Ecotoxicology Environ. Saf. 153, 16–22. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koumaki, E., Noutsopoulos, C., Mamais, D., Fragkiskatos, G., and Andreadakis, A. (2021). Fate of Emerging Contaminants in High-Rate Activated Sludge Systems. Ijerph 18, 400. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kullberg, E. G., DeJonge, K. C., and Chávez, J. L. (2017). Evaluation of thermal Remote Sensing Indices to Estimate Crop Evapotranspiration Coefficients. Agric. Water Manag. 179, 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurtz, A. E., Reiner, J. L., West, K. L., and Jensen, B. A. (2019). Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Hawaiian Cetaceans and Potential Biomarkers of Effect: Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha and Cytochrome P450 4A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 2830–2839. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lavrnić, S., Zapater-Pereyra, M., and Mancini, M. L. (2017). Water Scarcity and Wastewater Reuse Standards in Southern Europe: Focus on Agriculture. Water Air Soil Pollut. 228, 251. doi:10.1007/s11270-017-3425-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Qu, C., Bian, Y., Gu, C., Jiang, X., and Song, Y. (2019). New Insights into the Responses of Soil Microorganisms to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Stress by Combining Enzyme Activity and Sequencing Analysis with Metabolomics. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113312. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ling, W., and Gao, Y. (2004). Promoted Dissipation of Phenanthrene and Pyrene in Soils by Amaranth (Amaranthus Tricolor L.). Env Geol. 46, 553–560. doi:10.1007/s00254-004-1028-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Xie, L., Li, J., Wang, X., et al. (2020). Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) in Soil of the Pearl River Delta, China: Spatial Distribution, Sources, and Ecological Risk Assessment. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 78, 182–189. doi:10.1007/s00244-019-00674-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Weisman, D., Ye, Y.-b., Cui, B., Huang, Y.-h., Colón-Carmona, A., et al. (2009). An Oxidative Stress Response to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure Is Rapid and Complex in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 176, 375–382. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.12.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loos, R., Carvalho, R., António, D. C., Comero, S., Locoro, G., Tavazzi, S., et al. (2013). EU-wide Monitoring Survey on Emerging Polar Organic Contaminants in Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents. Water Res. 47, 6475–6487. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

López-Serna, R., Postigo, C., Blanco, J., Pérez, S., Ginebreda, A., de Alda, M. L., et al. (2012). Assessing the Effects of Tertiary Treated Wastewater Reuse on the Presence Emerging Contaminants in a Mediterranean River (Llobregat, NE Spain). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 19, 1000–1012. doi:10.1007/s11356-011-0596-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Q., He, Z. L., and Stoffella, P. J. (20122012). Land Application of Biosolids in the USA: A Review. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2012/201462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luoma, S. N. (2008). Silver Nanotechnologies and the Environment: Old Problems or New Challenges? Available at: https://wwwrcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/tracel/references/pdf/Luoma%202008_pen_15.pdf (Accessed March 4, 2022).

Google Scholar

Mackay, D., and Callcott, D. (1998). “Partitioning and Physical Chemical Properties of PAHs,” in PAHs And Related Compounds: Chemistry the Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Editor A. H. Neilson (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 325–345. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49697-7_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maliszewska-Kordybach, B., and Smreczak, B. (2000). Ecotoxicological Activity of Soils Polluted with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) - Effect on Plants. Environ. Tech. 21, 1099–1110. doi:10.1080/09593330.2000.9618996

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDonald, R. I., Green, P., Balk, D., Fekete, B. M., Revenga, C., Todd, M., et al. (2011). Urban Growth, Climate Change, and Freshwater Availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 6312–6317. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011615108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, F., and Chi, J. (2015). Interactions between Potamogeton Crispus L. And Phenanthrene and Pyrene in Sediments. J. Soils Sediments 15, 1256–1264. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1080-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mtshali, J. S., Ababu, T. T., and Amos, O. F. (2014). Sewage Sludge, Nutrient Value, Organic Fertilizer, Soil Amendment, Sludge Reuse, Nitrogen, Phosphorus. Resour. Environ. 10.

Google Scholar

Müller, C. E., De Silva, A. O., Small, J., Williamson, M., Wang, X., Morris, A., et al. (2011). Biomagnification of Perfluorinated Compounds in a Remote Terrestrial Food Chain: Lichen-Caribou-Wolf. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 8665–8673. doi:10.1021/es201353v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nowack, B., Ranville, J. F., Diamond, S., Gallego-Urrea, J. A., Metcalfe, C., Rose, J., et al. (2012). Potential Scenarios for Nanomaterial Release and Subsequent Alteration in the Environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31, 50–59. doi:10.1002/etc.726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paltiel, O., Fedorova, G., Tadmor, G., Kleinstern, G., Maor, Y., and Chefetz, B. (2016). Human Exposure to Wastewater-Derived Pharmaceuticals in Fresh Produce: A Randomized Controlled Trial Focusing on Carbamazepine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4476–4482. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, B., and Xing, B. (2012). Applications and Implications of Manufactured Nanoparticles in Soils: a Review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 63, 437–456. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01475.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, H., Lei, H., He, X., Xi, B., and Xu, Q. (2019). Spatial Distribution of Organochlorine and Organophosphorus Pesticides in Soil-Groundwater Systems and Their Associated Risks in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin. Environ. Geochem. Health 41, 1833–1845. doi:10.1007/s10653-017-9970-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2008). “Phthalates,” in Encyclopedia of Ecology. Editors S. E. Jørgensen, and B. D. Fath (Oxford: Academic Press), 2733–2738. doi:10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00419-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petousi, I., Daskalakis, G., Fountoulakis, M. S., Lydakis, D., Fletcher, L., Stentiford, E. I., et al. (2019). Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on the Establishment of Young Grapevines. Sci. Total Environ. 658, 485–492. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrie, B., Barden, R., and Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. (2015). A Review on Emerging Contaminants in Wastewaters and the Environment: Current Knowledge, Understudied Areas and Recommendations for Future Monitoring. Water Res. 72, 3–27. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poucke, C. V., Detavernier, C., and Peteghem, C. V. (2012). “Residues of Growth Promoters,” in Food Analysis by HPLC. Editors L. M. L. Nollet and F. Toldra (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/b13024

Google Scholar

Preisendanz, H. E., Barnes, R. G., Mashtare, M. L., Lintern, A., Mina, O., Williams, C., et al. (2021). The Emergence, Trajectory, and Impacts of Emerging Contaminants Publications in the Journal of Environmental Quality. J. Environ. Qual. 50, 1339–1346. doi:10.1002/jeq2.20299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prevedouros, K., Cousins, I. T., Buck, R. C., and Korzeniowski, S. H. (2006). Sources, Fate and Transport of Perfluorocarboxylates. ChemInform 37. doi:10.1002/chin.200611255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pullagurala, V. L. R., Rawat, S., Adisa, I. O., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Peralta-Videa, J. R., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2018). Plant Uptake and Translocation of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 1585–1596. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., and Foley, J. A. (2013). Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050. PLOS ONE 8, e66428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reddy, P. V. L., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Peralta-Videa, J. R., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2016). Lessons Learned: Are Engineered Nanomaterials Toxic to Terrestrial Plants? Sci. Total Environ. 568, 470–479. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakshi, S. K., Singh, S. K., and Haritash, A. K. (2019). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Soil Pollution and Remediation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 6489–6512. doi:10.1007/s13762-019-02414-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, T., Qadir, M., Yamamoto, S., Endo, T., and Zahoor, A. (2013). Global, Regional, and Country Level Need for Data on Wastewater Generation, Treatment, and Use. Agric. Water Manag. 130, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.08.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Servin, A. D., De la Torre-Roche, R., Castillo-Michel, H., Pagano, L., Hawthorne, J., Musante, C., et al. (2017). Exposure of Agricultural Crops to Nanoparticle CeO2 in Biochar-Amended Soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 110, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sha, B., Johansson, J. H., Tunved, P., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Cousins, I. T., and Salter, M. E. (2022). Sea Spray Aerosol (SSA) as a Source of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) to the Atmosphere: Field Evidence from Long-Term Air Monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 228–238. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, G., Gupta, D., Shukla, R., and Mishra, V. K. (2021). “Application of Constructed Wetlands for the Safe and Sustainable Treatment of Emerging Contaminants,” in Sustainable Environmental Clean-Up. Editors V. Kumar Mishra, and A. Kumar (Elsevier), 85–104. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-823828-8.00004-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sparling, D. W. (2016). “Organochlorine Pesticides,” in Chapter 4 - Organochlorine PesticidesEcotoxicology Essentials. Editor D. W. Sparling (San Diego: Academic Press), 69–107. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801947-4.00004-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srikanth, K. (2019). Emerging Contaminants Effect on Aquatic Ecosystem: Human Health Risks. Artoaj 19. doi:10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.19.556104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Staples, C. A., Peterson, D. R., Parkerton, T. F., and Adams, W. J. (1997). The Environmental Fate of Phthalate Esters: A Literature Review. Chemosphere 35, 667–749. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00195-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, O., and Brogat, M. (2017). “Organic Constituents,” in UV-visible Spectrophotometry of Water and Wastewater. Editors O. Thomas, and C. Burgess. Second Edition (Elsevier), 73–138. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63897-7.00003-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

US EPA (2015). Contaminants of Emerging Concern Including Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Cincinnati, OH: EPA/National Service Center for Environmental Publications. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/wqc/contaminants-emerging-concern-including-pharmaceuticals-and-personal-care-products (Accessed July 7, 2020).

Google Scholar

US EPA (2008). Nanotechnology for Site Remediation: Fact Sheet, 17. Cincinnati, OH: EPA/National Service Center for Environmental Publications.

Google Scholar

US EPA, (2017). Technical Fact Sheet - Nanomaterials. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Land and Emergency Management (5106P). EPA-505-R-17-002.

Google Scholar

US EPA (2014). Organic Chemicals, Plastics and Synthetic Fibers Effluent Guidelines. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/eg/organic-chemicals-plastics-and-synthetic-fibers-effluent-guidelines (Accessed January 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

US EPA (2013a). Research. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/research (Accessed January 25, 2022).

Google Scholar

US EPA (2013b). Waste, Chemical, and Cleanup Enforcement. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/waste-chemical-and-cleanup-enforcement (Accessed January 24, 2022).

Google Scholar

USGS (2017). Pesticides | US Geological Survey. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/ohio-kentucky-indiana-water-science-center/science/pesticides (Accessed January 24, 2022).

Google Scholar

USGS (2002). USGS OFR-02-94 Water-Quality Data for Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in US Streams, 1999-2000. Available at: https://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/OFR-02-94/index.html (Accessed January 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

Van, D.-A., Ngo, T. H., Huynh, T. H., Nakada, N., Ballesteros, F., and Tanaka, H. (2021). Distribution of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in Aquatic Environment in Hanoi and Metro Manila. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 847. doi:10.1007/s10661-021-09622-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Ittersum, M. K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Wolf, J., Grassini, P., van Wart, J., Guilpart, N., et al. (2016). Can Sub-saharan Africa Feed Itself? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14964–14969. doi:10.1073/pnas.1610359113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasilachi, I., Asiminicesei, D., Fertu, D., and Gavrilescu, M. (2021). Occurrence and Fate of Emerging Pollutants in Water Environment and Options for Their Removal. Water 13, 181. doi:10.3390/w13020181

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

von der Ohe, P. C., Dulio, V., Slobodnik, J., De Deckere, E., Kühne, R., Ebert, R.-U., et al. (2011). A New Risk Assessment Approach for the Prioritization of 500 Classical and Emerging Organic Microcontaminants as Potential River basin Specific Pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 2064–2077. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., and Wang, S. (2016). Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) from Wastewater: A Review. J. Environ. Manage. 182, 620–640. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., and Huang, H. (2019). “Carbon Nanotube Composite Membranes for Microfiltration of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products,” in Advanced Nanomaterials For Membrane Synthesis And its Applications Micro and Nano Technologies. Editors W.-J. Lau, A. F. Ismail, A. Isloor, and A. Al-Ahmed (Elsevier), 183–202. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814503-6.00008-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Westerhoff, P., and Nowack, B. (2013). Searching for Global Descriptors of Engineered Nanomaterial Fate and Transport in the Environment. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 844–853. doi:10.1021/ar300030n

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiesner, M. R., Lowry, G. V., Jones, K. L., Hochella, , , Di Giulio, R. T., Casman, E., et al. (2009). Decreasing Uncertainties in Assessing Environmental Exposure, Risk, and Ecological Implications of Nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6458–6462. doi:10.1021/es803621k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, W., Yu, Q., You, L., Chen, K., Tang, H., and Liu, J. (2018). Global Cropping Intensity Gaps: Increasing Food Production without Cropland Expansion. Land Use Policy 76, 515–525. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wuana, R. A., and Okieimen, F. E. (20112011). Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecol. 2011, 1–20. doi:10.5402/2011/402647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xuan, R., Blassengale, A. A., and Wang, Q. (2008). Degradation of Estrogenic Hormones in a Silt Loam Soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 9152–9158. doi:10.1021/jf8016942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Hu, Z., Liu, Y., Xie, X., Huang, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2022). Effect of Pyrene-Induced Changes in Root Activity on Growth of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica Campestris L.), and the Health Risks Caused by Pyrene in Chinese Cabbage at Different Growth Stages. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 9, 7. doi:10.1186/s40538-021-00280-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yigzaw, W., and Hossain, F. (2016). Water Sustainability of Large Cities in the United States from the Perspectives of Population Increase, Anthropogenic Activities, and Climate Change. Earth's Future 4, 603–617. doi:10.1002/2016EF000393

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeng, F., Cui, K., Xie, Z., Wu, L., Liu, M., Sun, G., et al. (2008). Phthalate Esters (PAEs): Emerging Organic Contaminants in Agricultural Soils in Peri-Urban Areas Around Guangzhou, China. Environ. Pollut. 156, 425–434. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.01.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ziylan, A., and Ince, N. H. (2011). The Occurrence and Fate of Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic Pharmaceuticals in Sewage and Fresh Water: Treatability by Conventional and Non-conventional Processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 187, 24–36. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: water quailty, soil quality, emerging contaminants, agriculture, environment

Citation: Bayabil HK, Teshome FT and Li YC (2022) Emerging Contaminants in Soil and Water. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:873499. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.873499

Received: 10 February 2022; Accepted: 01 March 2022;
Published: 25 March 2022.

Edited by:

Qibing Wang, Institute of Botany (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Tamer A. Elbana, National Research Centre, Egypt

Copyright © 2022 Bayabil, Teshome and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haimanote K. Bayabil, aGJheWFiaWxAdWZsLmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.