A Succinct review of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analyses, challenges and prospects of solar and wind tree technologies for hybrid power generation
- 1Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Kuantan, Malaysia
- 2Centre for Research in Advanced Fluid and Process, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Kuantan, Malaysia
- 3Research Centre for Nano-Materials and Energy Technology (RCNMET), School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
- 4CoE for Energy and Eco-Sustainability Research, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
by Mohanaravi K, Samykano M, Pandey AK, Noor MM and Kadirgama K (2024). Front. Energy Res. 12:1417511. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1417511
In the published article, Eltayeb et al. (2023) was not cited in the article. The citation has now been inserted in 4. Overview of solar wind hybrid tree, 4.3 Working principle and components of hybrid tree, [Figure caption of 4 (A)] and should read:
“Figure 4 (A) Schematic of wind tree (Eltayeb et al., 2023).”
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 4B real-time view of the hybrid solar-wind tree (Gürel et al., 2023) as published. The corrected legend appears below.
“Figure 4B real-time view of the hybrid solar-wind tree (Reddy et al., 2022).”
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 1 Global solar irradiance (Reddy et al., 2022) as published. The citation was Reddy et al. (2022), but it is mentioned to be as Gürel et al. (2023). The corrected legend appears below.
“Figure 1 Global solar irradiance (Gürel et al., 2023).”
In the published article, there was an error in “FIGURE 3 Wind tree (Source: New World wind)” as published. The corrected Figure 3 and its caption appear below.
“Wind tree (Source: https://www.startupselfie.net/2022/07/23/the-wind-tree/ and New World wind).”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Eltayeb, W. A., Somlal, J., Kumar, S., and Rao, S. K. (2023). Design and analysis of a solar-wind hybrid renewable energy tree. Results in Engineering 17, 100958. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100958
Gürel, A. E., Ağbulut, Ü., Bakır, H., Ergün, A., and Yıldız, G. (2023). A state of art review on estimation of solar radiation with various models. Heliyon 9, e13167. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13167
Keywords: SWOT analyses, renewable energy, solar tree, wind tree, sustainability
Citation: Mohanaravi K, Samykano M, Pandey AK, Noor MM and kadirgama K (2024) Corrigendum: A succinct review of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analyses, challenges and prospects of solar and wind tree technologies for hybrid power generation. Front. Energy Res. 12:1528600. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1528600
Received: 15 November 2024; Accepted: 26 November 2024;
Published: 09 December 2024.
Edited and reviewed by:
Manoj Kumar Nallapaneni, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaCopyright © 2024 Mohanaravi, Samykano, Pandey, Noor and kadirgama. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mahendran Samykano, bWFoZW5kcmFuQHVtcHNhLmVkdS5teQ==