![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Energy Res. , 05 July 2024
Sec. Smart Grids
Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1439264
This article is a correction to:
A comparison of several maximum power point tracking algorithms for a photovoltaic power system
A Corrigendum on
A comparison of several maximum power point tracking algorithms for a photovoltaic power system
by Aifan G. Alsulami A, Alhussainy AA, Allehyani A, Alturki YA, Alghamdi SM, Alruwaili M and Alharthi YZ (2024). Front. Energy Res. 12:1413252. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1413252
In the published article, there was an error in the Acknowledgments statement. “The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA, for funding this research through the project number “NBU-FFR-2024-2124-02.” The correct Acknowledgments statement appears below.
Acknowledgments
“The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA, for funding this research through the project number “NBU-FFR-2024-2124-02.” The authors would like to express their profound gratitude to King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy (K.A.CARE) for their financial support in accomplishing this work.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: photovoltaic (PV), maximumpower point (MPP), incremental conductance (INC), perturb and observe (PO), standard test condition (STC), fuzzy logic control (FCL), artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)
Citation: Alsulami AAG, Alhussainy AA, Allehyani A, Alturki YA, Alghamdi SM, Alruwaili M and Alharthi YZ (2024) Corrigendum: A comparison of several maximum power point tracking algorithms for a photovoltaic power system. Front. Energy Res. 12:1439264. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1439264
Received: 27 May 2024; Accepted: 20 June 2024;
Published: 05 July 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Alsulami, Alhussainy, Allehyani, Alturki, Alghamdi, Alruwaili and Alharthi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abdullah Ali Alhussainy, YWFsaHVzc2FpbnkwMDAxQHN0dS5rYXUuZWR1LnNh
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.