The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1417240
This article is part of the Research Topic Cardiovascular Diseases Related to Diabetes and Obesity - Volume V View all 19 articles
Sex Differences in Intracranial Plaque Burden in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: A Pilot Study Based on High-resolution MRI
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of MRI, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi’an, China
- 2 Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an, China
- 3 Department of Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Xi’an, China
Background Atherosclerosis (AS) is the main cause of macrovascular disease. Previous studies have found sex differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated macrovascular disease outcomes. However, the relationship between sex differences, T2DM, and AS is not fully understood. This study attempts to explore possible associations between sex, treatment, and the burden of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with T2DM who have experienced an acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Methods We focused on patients with T2DM with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. ICAS was assessed by 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance vascular wall imaging. Plaque counts of the total, proximal, and distal intracranial arteries were used to assess plaque burden. Patients with a history of T2DM and currently taking hypoglycemic drugs were defined as being treated. Poisson regression models or negative binomial regression models were used to analyze the interaction between sex and treatment in relation to plaque burden. Results A total of 495 plaques were detected in 120 patients (75 male; mean age, 60.77±11.01 years), including 311 proximal and 184 distal plaques. The intracranial culprit plaque was located proximal to the artery in both male (85.3%) and female (88.9%) patients. The adjusted total and proximal intracranial plaque burdens were 1.261 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.050–1.515, P=0.013) and 1.322 times (95%CI, 1.055–1.682, P=0.016) higher in male than in female patients. The risk ratio for proximal plaque burden in untreated male versus female patients was 0.966 (95%CI, 0.704–1.769). However, the proximal plaque risk ratio for treated male versus female patients was 1.530 (95%CI, 1.076–2.174). The interaction of sex and treatment significantly affected the proximal plaque burden. Conclusion Male patients with T2DM and acute cerebrovascular disease have a significantly higher adjusted risk of total and proximal intracranial plaque burden compared to female patients. Female patients undergoing antidiabetic treatment have a significantly reduced risk of proximal plaque to males. Considering that culprit plaques tend to accumulate in the proximal arteries, understanding how to reduce the burden of proximal plaques may help reduce the risk of adverse cerebrovascular events.
Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, sex difference, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, Intracranial atherosclerosis
Received: 14 Apr 2024; Accepted: 30 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Yan, Li, Gao, Wang, Ai, Lei, Tang, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dongsheng Zhang, Department of MRI, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi’an, 7100002, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.