Daniela P. Foti
Antonio Brunetti- 1Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
- 2Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Transcriptional regulation of glucose metabolism: gaps and controversies, volume II
In mammals, glucose homeostasis is tightly regulated to sustain energy supply to vital organs and tissues, ensuring individual health. Genetic and/or environmental disruption of glucose metabolism and homeostasis can lead to cellular dysfunction, contributing to endocrine and metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, the metabolic syndrome, and obesity (1–3). External signals, including hormones, adipokines, nutrients, and other biologically active molecules can influence cellular glucose uptake and utilization by modulating key enzymes directly involved in glucose-related metabolic pathways (4–6). Moreover, both ubiquitous and tissue-specific transcription factors, like ATF3, HMGA1, PPARγ, ChREBP, FOXO1, and PDX-1 are involved in several physiological processes and play essential roles in glucose metabolism and homeostasis (7–10). Furthermore, accumulating lines of evidence emphasize the important regulatory roles of non-coding RNAs, like miR-33, miR-34, miR-194, the newly discovered miR-128, and lncRNA-H19, which have been reported to impact glucose metabolism (11–13). However, the roles of other non-coding RNAs identified to date, remain largely unknown within this scenario (14, 15).
This second volume of “Transcriptional regulation of glucose metabolism: gaps and controversies” aims to expand understanding in this field.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K) represent a group of phylogenetically conserved enzymes that function as intracellular signal transducers, which are involved in many fundamental biological processes, including insulin signal transduction, cell growth, cell proliferation and differentiation (16). In mammals, the diverse range of isoforms found for each PI3K subunit (and their combinations) have likely evolved to adequately face the complexity of nutrient sensing and metabolic regulation in multicellular organisms. In this regard, Kim et al. provide an overview of the distinct roles of the regulatory subunits of class IA PI3K, and in particular the p85 regulatory subunit, in metabolism, cancer and immunity. Despite the structural similarities between p85α and p85β, the authors highlight their distinct functional repertoires in consideration of cellular stoichiometry (the relative abundance of p85 compared to the PI3K catalytic subunit, p110), tissue types, and external elements, like nutrients and insulin, concluding that future research is needed to better understand their physiological roles and their potential as drug targets.
The upcoming contributions to this topic share the interest in discussing or investigating some pathogenetic mechanisms underpinning specific metabolic diseases.
As the liver plays a key role in glucose and lipid metabolism, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a bidirectional association with components of the metabolic syndrome, thus representing a risk factor for many metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes (T2D) (17). In their review article, Yu et al. discuss the role of members of the forkhead box (FOX) transcription factors in the context of hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism and in NAFLD. Being FOXA1, FOXA2, and FOXA3 involved in multiple stages of mammalian life (18), the authors offer a description of their role in the development of endoderm-derived organs, such as liver, pancreas and adipose tissue, in the control of glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 gene promoters, as well as in hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism. Contrary to what has emerged from studies in animal and cellular models, however, the precise role of FOXA proteins in NAFLD remains elusive.
Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) is the most common type of monogenic diabetes, affecting 1-5% of all diabetes cases (19). With the application of genetic sequencing techniques to clinical practice, and the greater awareness of this clinical entity among clinicians, especially endocrinologists, new candidate genes have been recently identified, further expanding our knowledge about this disease. In their review, Samadli et al. describe both traditional and emerging genetic determinants leading to MODY. They specifically categorize discrete etiological subtypes, ranging from defects in glucose sensing to channelopathies, impaired insulin trafficking, defects in transcriptional regulation, and even defects beyond the β -cell, affecting the interplay between pancreatic acinar and islet cells through mechanisms of exocytosis and endocytosis. Progress in this field holds promise to contribute, from a single protein perspective, not only to a better understanding and a tailored treatment of each MODY subtype, but also to sorting out the more complex mechanisms that characterize the common polygenic forms of diabetes.
Pancreatic islet cell failure is central to T2D development and progression. Song et al. utilize “omic” techniques and bioinformatics to explore potential crucial genes and pathways associated with pyroptosis and immune infiltration in islet dysfunction (20, 21). By combining a conjoint analysis of three bulk RNA-seq datasets, and single-cell transcriptome analysis of islet tissue, the authors identify immune and T2D-related differentially expressed genes associated with pyroptosis and immune infiltration, that may contribute to islet inflammation during T2D development. The discovery of distinct gene signatures through “omic” techniques can help unraveling new pathogenetic mechanisms, and may offer an important contribution to current knowledge of islet dysfunction and to future targeted therapeutic interventions in diabetes.
In summary, this Research Topic emphasizes the importance of elucidating the regulatory mechanisms operating in glucose metabolism and homeostasis. By introducing new players and utilizing “omic” techniques, the studies in this topic provide valuable insights into the regulation of genes, enzymes, and intracellular biomolecules involved in glucose metabolic pathways and energy storage. They also may help to identify potential therapeutic targets for improving glycemic control.
Author contributions
DF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. De Fronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2015) 1:15019. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.19
2. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease (syndrome X): an expanded definition. Annu Rev Med (1993) 44:121–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.001005
3. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med (2017) 376:254–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1514009
4. Aronoff SL, Berkowitz K, Shreiner B, Want L. Glucose metabolism and regulation: beyond insulin and glucagon. Diabetes Spectr (2004) 17:183–90. doi: 10.2337/diaspec.17.3.183
5. Wang X, Zhang S, Li Z. Adipokines in glucose and lipid metabolism. Adipocyte (2023) 12:2202976. doi: 10.1080/21623945.2023.2202976
6. Heer M, Egert S. Nutrients other than carbohydrates: their effects on glucose homeostasis in humans. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2015) 31:14–35. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2533
7. Desvergne B, Michalik L, Wahli W. Transcriptional regulation of metabolism. Physiol Rev (2006) 86:465–514. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2005
8. Ku H-C, Cheng C-F. Master regulator Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3) in metabolic homeostasis and cancer. Front Endocrinol (2020) 11:556. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00556
9. Chiefari E, Foti DP, Sgarra R, Pegoraro S, Arcidiacono B, Brunetti FS, et al. Transcriptional regulation of glucose metabolism: the emerging role of the HMGA1 chromatin factor. Front Endocrinol (2018) 9:357. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00357
10. Kitamura T. The role of FOXO1 in beta-cell failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2013) 9:615–23. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.157
11. Agbu P, Carthew RW. Micro-RNA-mediated regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2021) 22:425–38. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00354-w
12. Arcidiacono B, Chiefari E, Forsyst-Ludwig A, Currò G, Navarra G, Brunetti FS, et al. Obesity-related hypoxia via miR-128 decreases insulin receptor expression in human and mouse adipose tissue promoting systemic insulin resistance. EbioMedicine (2020) 59:102912. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102912
13. Zhang T-N, Wang W, Yang N, Huang X-M, Liu C-F. Regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism by long non-coding RNAs: facts and research progress. Front Endocrinol (2020) 11:457. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00457
14. Greco M, Mirabelli M, Salatino A, Accattato F, Aiello V, Brunetti FS, et al. From euglycemia to recent onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a proof-of-concept study on circulating microRNA profiling reveals distinct, and early microRNA signatures. Diagnostics (2023) 13:2443. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142443
15. Kim M, Zhang X. The profiling and role of miRNAs in diabetets mellitus. J Diabetes Clin Res (2019) 1:5–23. doi: 10.33696/diabetes.1.003
16. Fruman DA, Chiu H, Hopkins BD, Bagrodia S, Cantley LC, Abraham RT. The PI3K pathway in human disease. Cell (2017) 170:605–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.029
17. Powell EE, Wong VW-S, Rinella M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lancet (2021) 397:2212–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32511-3
18. Friedman JR, Kaestner KH. The Foxa family of transcription factors in development and metabolism. Cell Mol Life Sci (2006) 63:2317–28. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6095-6
19. Satman I. Clinical manifestations and biomarkers of the Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young. Endocrinol Res Pract (2023) 27:98–112. doi: 10.5152/erp.2023.253
20. Zhou J, Zhang X, Ji L, Jiang G. Identification of potential biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus-related immune infiltration using weighted gene coexpression network analysis. BioMed Res Int (2022) 2022:9920744. doi: 10.1155/2022/9920744
Keywords: glucose homeostasis, gene transcription, insulin resistance, insulin signaling, transcription factors
Citation: Foti DP and Brunetti A (2024) Editorial: Transcriptional regulation of glucose metabolism: gaps and controversies, volume II. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1383690. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1383690
Received: 07 February 2024; Accepted: 19 February 2024;
Published: 27 February 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Ralf Jockers, Université Paris Cité, FranceCopyright © 2024 Foti and Brunetti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniela P. Foti, Zm90aUB1bmljei5pdA==; Antonio Brunetti, YnJ1bmV0dGlAdW5pY3ouaXQ=